Roadside Safety Proven Countermeasures. Emmett McDevitt Transportation Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

Similar documents
Engineering Countermeasures for Transportation Safety. Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety

Systemic Safety. Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation March 2016

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

Roadway Departure Focus State Initiative Roadside Safety Systems Inspection, Maintenance & Designers Mentoring Program

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

References General Definitions

Now Let s Think Systemic

Preventing Lane Departures Rumbles and Mumbles

Road Safety Facilities Implemented in Japan

Proven Safety Countermeasures. FHWA Office of Safety January 12, :00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time

Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Road Side Design: When is a Barrier Required?

Lessons Learned from the Minnesota County Road Safety Plans. Richard Storm CH2M HILL

Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness for Roadway Departure Crashes

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 405 LIMB MANAGEMENT

APPENDIX G Lane Departure Action Plan

ROADSIDE DELINEATION AND SAFETY SYSTEMS

Implementing Strategies from Missouri s Blueprint for Safer Roadways Using System-wide Safety Solutions to Save Lives

Pavement Markings (1 of 3)

Local Road Safety Plans

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

24,801 Roadway Departure Fatalities Nationally. The Safety Edge : Minimizing The Effects of Shoulder Drop-off. 41,059 Highway Fatalities a Year

Road Safety Assessments. Lt. Bob McCurdy Williamson County Sheriff s s Office Marion, IL.

Road Safety Audit Course Participant Guidebook. August 22 & 23, Cleveland Avenue Columbus, Ohio

Safety Data Resources. Multi-Discipline Safety Planning Forum March 10 & 11, 2008 Gateway Center

Closing Plenary Session

Maine Highway Safety Facts 2016

IMPACT OF GEOMETRIC CONDITIONS ON WYOMING S RURAL CRASHES

Hot Spot Identification and Analysis Methodology

Lane Departure. Key Facts

Human factors studies were simulator-based studies not transferable Safety impacts were not well understood

Idaho Driver Education and Training

Engineering Your Community Safe

Michael D. Turpeau Jr. State Safety Program Supervisor Georgia Department of Transportation

Readington Road (C.R. 637) Construction

Pavement Markings to Reduce Lane Departure Crashes. Paul Carlson, PhD, PE Road Infrastructure Inc.

Roadway depa epa tu tu e

KY s s RSA Evolution. Jo Anne Tingle, PE Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) AASHTO TIG/FHWA RSA PEER Exchange Little Rock, AR - April 29, 2008

Brussels, Belgium Nov 5, 2014

Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications

A Strategic Highway Safety Plan. a coordinated and informed approach to reducing highway fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads.

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

Technical Memorandum SAFETY AND SECURITY. Prepared for: Prepared by:

Recent U.S. Research on Safety Evaluation of Low-Cost Road Engineering Safety Countermeasures Lessons for Canada

APPENDIX A Urban Control Zone Corridor Study Reports

There s a Killer on the Road What Can be Done about Roadway Departure Crashes? Rural Road Safety Webinar Series Thursday, November 3, 2011

CHECKLIST 4: PRE-OPENING STAGE AUDIT

ADJUSTING TO, FOLLOWING, AND MEETING URBAN TRAFFIC

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer

Shoulders. Chapter 4: chapter contents

Road Safety Audit training course. Motorways - safety issues of the motorway design

Sponsored by the Office of Traffic and Safety of the Iowa Department of Transportation NOVEMBER 2001 CTRE

Horizontal Curve Safety Gregory J. Taylor, P.E.

Road Safety Audit Report: Interstate 516

SR 53 Corridor Study. Final Report Presentation. Friday, October 3, :00 AM to noon

Work Zone Traffic Safety

Safety at Unsignalized Intersections. Unsignalized Intersections

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

Proven Safety Countermeasures Webinar Series

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

Introduction Methodology Study area and data collection Results and recommendation Conclusion References

Field Guide for Unpaved Rural Roads

Institute of Transportation Engineers Safety Action Plan

Potential Factors Affecting Roadway Departure Crashes in Oahu, Hawaii

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

TABLE OF CONTENTS. General... A. New Construction/Reconstruction (4R)...B. Resurfacing, Restoration and Rehabilitation (3R)...C

ADA on Construction. Guidance for Section C Plan Preparers

Accommodating Pedestrians in the Work Zone

Where Did the Road Go? The Straight and Narrow about Curves

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

IMPROVING DRIVER BEHAVIOR WITH INFRASTRUCTURE SAFETY COUNTERMEASURES AMERICAN TRAFFIC SAFETY SERVICES ASSOCIATION

AMMO Field Data Collection Manual

Kentucky s Surface Transportation System

Recently Developed Intersection CMFs. Nancy Lefler, VHB ATSIP Traffic Records Forum, 2014

Driveway Design Criteria

GDOT Cross Section Elements. Course ID: GDOT PDH Credits

REDUCING COLLISIONS AT HIGH CRASH LOCATIONS

Germanna Highway Route 3

KANSAS STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN

ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS TO ENSURE ROAD SAFETY: EXPERIENCES FROM INDIA

Cross Section Elements

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (13-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Road safety design standards and the Asian Highway Network. irap Asia Pacific Workshop Greg Smith 2016/05/26

Traffic Signs and Markings. Instructor: Dr. Yahya Sarraj Associate Prof. Of Transportation

Chapter V TRAFFIC CONTROLS. Tewodros N.

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

(HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN -1)

Discover the Safe System Approach

Speed Management Action Plan

General Design Factors

APPENDIX D Draft Chapter 10 for AASHTO Roadside Design Guide

TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY TASK FORCE. Jeff Moseley Texas Transportation Commission

Geometric Design Tables

1 Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Victoria, RACV, 550 Princes Highway Noble Park, Victoria, 3174.

HSIP Project Selection Criteria

Dear Fellow Nebraskans:

6.8 Transportation Safety & Security

Transcription:

Roadside Safety Proven Countermeasures Emmett McDevitt Transportation Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

Safety Statistics On average each year 43,000 + people die in traffic related crashes. On average 3.2 Million are injured Family Co-Workers Friends

Major League Baseball Field Seating capacity 41,000 to 47,000 Population of Phoenix Arizona 3,251,876

National Safety Objectives Roadway Departure Intersections Pedestrians

National Safety Objectives Roadway departure Minimize roadway departures Reduce severity of roadway departures

Run-Off Off-the-Road Average of 14,000+ fatalities per year About 39% of total average fatalities

Intersections Average of 8500+ fatalities per year; About 21% of total average fatalities

Pedestrians Average of 4500+ fatalities per year About 11% of total average fatalities

Run-off off-road Crashes 42% occur on curves 50% in rural areas 42% are rollovers and life threatening events 25% are collisions with trees

Run-Off Off-the-Road Problem +1/3 of all Traffic Fatalities 2/3 on 2-lane 2 roads 1/2 at night

Run-off off-the-road Inattention Reasons Poor visibility Speeding Impaired Driving Avoidance of obstacle

Welcome to Boise

RUMBLE STRIPS Milled-in Centerline Rumble Strips

Quick History Rumble Strips NYSTA Retrofitted entire system in the years between 1992-1996 1996 Entire NYS system of Interstates, Expressways and Freeways were retro-fitted by late 1990 s Both enjoyed an average 65% reduction in ROTR accidents

Shoulder Rumble Strips Studies show reductions in ROR crashes with presence of shoulder rumble strips. 70 % Pennsylvania Turnpike, 1994 34 % New Jersey Turnpike, 1995 65 % New York State, 1998 72 % New York Thruway, 1994 42 % Massachusetts Turnpike, 1997 18 % Washington, 1991 49 % California Interstate, 1998 34 % Kansas Turnpike, 1991

Rumble Stripes Night + Rain Conditions

Experimental use of: Wet reflective PM s Grooved in PM Grooved in High profile beads (1.9 index) Grooved in Wet-reflective tape Grooved in True Wet reflective paint with elements

Grooved in True Wet Reflective Element

The Problem

Dangerous Drop-Offs

The Cause Erosion from tires Erosion from weather Successive overlays without sufficient backfill

The Result

The Solution Safety Edge

Wedge Joint

Better Guidance and Delineation

HORIZONTAL CURVES Widened/Stabilized Lane or Shoulder on Inside of Curve, Cheverons if appropriate

Priority Order of Treatment Remove obstacle Make potential hazard traversable Relocate obstacle Reduce impact severity Shield obstacle Delineate obstacle

Run-off off-the-road Solutions Remove obstacle BEFORE AFTER Digitally enhanced photograph

Eliminate Need for Guiderail

Fixed Objects

Priority Order of Treatment Remove obstacle Make potential hazard traversable Relocate obstacle Reduce impact severity Shield obstacle Delineate obstacle

Before After

What s wrong with this picture?

SLOPES, EMBANKMENTS AND DITCHES VERTICAL DROP-OFF UTILITY POLE IN DITCH NON-TRAVERSABLE FORESLOPE

Roadside Hazard Fatalities Tree 28% Other 10% Conc. Barrier 2% Br. Rail 2% Sign Post 6% Fence 4% Culvert 5% Curb 6% Embankment 10% Utility Pole 9% Guardrail 10% Ditch 8%

Priority Order of Treatment Remove obstacle Make potential hazard traversable Relocate obstacle Reduce impact severity Shield obstacle Delineate obstacle

Run-off off-the-road Relocate obstacle BEFORE AFTER

Priority Order of Treatment Remove obstacle Make potential hazard traversable Relocate obstacle Reduce impact severity Shield obstacle Delineate obstacle

Run-off off-the-road Reduce impact severity with Crashworthy Devices

Priority Order of Treatment Remove obstacle Make potential hazard traversable Relocate obstacle Reduce impact severity Shield obstacle Delineate obstacle

Shielding the object

Roadside Hazard Fatalities Tree 28% Other 10% Conc. Barrier 2% Br. Rail 2% Sign Post 6% Fence 4% Culvert 5% Curb 6% Embankment 10% Utility Pole 9% Guardrail 10% Ditch 8%

Priority Order of Treatment Remove obstacle Make potential hazard traversable Relocate obstacle Reduce impact severity Shield obstacle Delineate obstacle

Run-off off-the-road Delineate obstacle

Better Guidance and Delineation

Warn Run-Off Off-the-Road Remove Relocate Reduce Impact Shield Delineate