!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Metro!Denver!MTD!Governance!Committee! October!23,!2013!!9:00!AM!to!10:00!AM! Denver!Regional!Council!of!Governments!

Similar documents
RECEIVED. Be it Enacted by the People of the State of Colorado: SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add part 11 to article 4 of title 43 as

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY

APPENDIX D: SACRAMENTO URBAN AREA TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Golden s Plan. For the Highway 6 & 93 Corridor

DULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Colorado s elected officials have decreased funding for road and bridge. Revenues that should have gone to roads pursuant to state law have been

3.0 Future Conditions

Project Description Form 8EE

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

Route 29 Solutions Projects

RECEIVED. Colorado Secretary of State. t iu. Initiative #22 ORIGINAL TEXT. Be it Enacted by the People of the State of Colorado:

Bluffdale/ UDOT South High-T Intersection Project Type Operations

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

FY STIP. Austin District. November Quarterly Revisions HIGHWAY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.

I-20 ODESSA-MIDLAND CORRIDOR STUDY. Public Meeting for Schematic Design

INTRODUCTION. The focus of this study is to reduce congestion and improve mobility for all modes of transportation. Figure ES-1 Study Corridor Map

LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 516 North Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO (719) FAX (719)

Draft MOBILITY ELEMENET. Community Meeting May 22, 2013

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Brooklyn Boulevard (County Road 152) Reconstruction Project Phase I. OPEN HOUSE June 20, 2017

I-25 South Gap Project Monument to Castle Rock

Evaluation Criteria. Record of Decision (ROD) 7/04-8/05 8/05-9/05 TBD TBD TBD. Final EIS (FEIS) Community Outreach

I-264 CORRIDOR EVALUATION STUDY. September 7, 2016 Eric Stringfield VDOT Planning Director Chris Lawrence AECOM Senior Transportation Engineer

CHAPTER 3.0: TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007

Transform 66 Project February 4, 2016 Partnering Conference Michigan Department of Transportation American Council of Engineering Companies

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

COMMUNITY MEETING AGENDA

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Terwillegar Drive Expressway Draft Concept Plan

Durham Region Long Term Transit Strategy

1. Operate along freeways, either in regular traffic lanes, in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, or along the shoulders.

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Freeway System Considerations

Turnpike Projects in Palm Beach County. Palm Beach TPA Update September 20, 2018

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Institute for Real Estate Management Chapter (IREM) 77 VDOT Northern Virginia Megaprojects September 13, 2017

STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE. October 8, 2015

5. MODIFICATIONS AT JEANNE D ARC BOULEVARD/REGIONAL ROAD 174 INTERCHANGE INTERSECTION - PUBLIC HEARING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

Planning Study SR 976. Project Advisory Team Meeting May 24, 2017

2016 Northwest Metro Region Mobility Report. July 2018

Road Diets FDOT Process

Executive Summary June 2015

DEKALB COUNTY. 22. Priority Projects for DeKalb County

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) PROJECT

Columbia Pike Implementation Team (CPIT) Meeting

Welcome. Thank you for your interest in the Lewis & Clark Viaduct Concept Study

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

Princeton Avenue and Spruce Street Transportation and Site Access Enhancements Project

Project Description Form 6V

Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION

Dulles Area Transportation Association. October 11, Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation

Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System

Environmental Assessment Findings & Recommendations. Public Hearing November 13, 2014

Route 7 Corridor Study

Defining Purpose and Need

Hennepin County Transportation Department

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Congress Avenue. Palm Beach MPO Subcommittee Meetings December 2017

State Highway 16 Kuna-Mora Road to Ada/Gem County Line

North County Metro. Community Summaries, Maps and Matrices

Cottonwood Heights HAWK Pedestrian Crossing on Fort Union Blvd. Project Type Capital Improvement

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

Description: Widen I-64 to 6 lanes from I-265 to the KY 53 interchange in Shelby County.

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Base Information. 1. Project Title State Highway 7 Preliminary & Environmental Engineering

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

CHIEF PEGUIS TRAIL EXTENSION WEST

COMMUNITY WORKSHOP (CW) 3 February 21, 2015

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #8 May 5, Welcome. Today s meeting will focus on: Land Use & Transportation CHARLOTTEPLANNING.

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Creating the Future Bruce B Downs Blvd

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

FI-2 I-66 Between Route 29, Lee Highway and Route 15, James Madison Highway


NEW BRAUNFELS SEGUIN AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DRAFT PLAN NEW BRAUNFELS CITY COUNCIL MEETING

VDOT I-66 Inside the Beltway Eastbound Widening Environmental Assessment. Staff Recommendations

Municipal Class EA To Address Traffic Congestion On The Ontario Street Corridor (Grand Bend) Public Information Meeting June 4, 2018

FM #: ETDM #: 11241

Project Fact Sheet. August 1,

North Hollywood to Pasadena BRT Corridor Technical Study. Eco-Rapid Transit/Orange Line Development Authority March 8, 2017

CITY OF SEATTLE RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) led the Seattle

Bike San Mateo County San Mateo County Bicycle Plan Recommendations August 30, 2010

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Maryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon

FY 2018 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Projects

I-66 Corridor Improvements Route 15 to I-495. November 2014

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Sarasota/Manatee MPO Project Priorities 2016 Adopted April 25, 2016

Bus Rapid Transit on Silicon Valley s El Camino Real: Working Together to Create a Grand Boulevard Steven Fisher

Transcription:

MetroDenverMTDGovernanceCommittee October23,2013 9:00AMto10:00AM DenverRegionalCouncilofGovernments MeetingRecord

MetroDenverMTDGovernanceCommittee October23,2013 9:00AM Agenda: 9:00AM Welcome&Introductions 9:05AM UpdatesIfAny 9:15AM DiscussionItems Pollingprojectlistadjustmentsoradditions o Reviewrevisionsemailedearlier 9:50AM NextSteps Nextmeeting 9:55AM Adjourn

Metro Denver MTD Governance Committee October 23, 2013 9:00 AM Notes: Project+List: Don+Hunt+ Doingbestwecantoorganizethelist NeedtodecidewheretheBRTprojectsbelong highwayortransit HermanStockinger&RebeccaWhite Listhasbeendiscussed(seeattached) Item1to23havebeenapprovedbyMTDforcontinueddiscussion 3,4&5atthebottomareprimarilytransitthoughsomeroadmoneywillbe spentonthemsotheyarecalledoutseparately Specificroadimprovementswillbeidentifiedlater TheseareBoulder sroadwayprioritieswillenhanceroadwaysafety andconditionaswellasbrt ConcernsfromCDOTS$$mustfollowresponsibility Boulderspecifiesthatthisdoesnotincludevehicles IfanexclusivebuslanethennotahighwayprojectperCDOT DoweknowwhenthepricingwillbebrokenoutSpartially determinedbynamsstudysbyjanuary SHS42hasnotbeenapprovedbyMTDbutisasuggestionsubmittedduring discussionofthelist $2.8S2.9Bisthetotal ThisneedstoshrinkStotalavailablestatewidearound$2B Number20isoutsideMTDareabutiswithinDRCOGarea(ClearCreek& GilpinCounties) Number19shouldbemanagedlanesifIS25Northismanagedlanes CDOTManagedLanePolicyDirectiveappliestoallnewcapacityprojects Managedapplieseverytimethereisanewlane CDOTwillasteriskthelistwherethepolicyapplies Policyisthatmanagedlanesarethepreferredapproachnot mandatory

Weneedthispolicyinwritingsowecanunderstanditparticularly thathighoccupancyvehicleswillbetreatedthesameastolled vehicles CDOTPoliciesinclude Newlanesincongestedcorridorsaretobefully evaluatedformanagedlaness default ismanagedlane WewillgofromHOV2toHOV3acrossthemetroarea by2017sifmanagedlaneincludeshovthenmustbe HOV3afterthatdate Anewlanecanbeafullyexpresstolllanebasedonlocal decision maintainslocalcontrol Publictransitwillalwaysbeallowedinmanagedlanes ThereisdiscussionwithRTDaboutwhether bussespayandhowmuch Weshouldspendthemoneyavailabletotheregionequitably Needtoknowwhatthesethingswillcost Opentoincludingtransitsupportiveelementsiftheyareregionally significantandequitable Generalagreementfrom36corridorthattransitonlyelements shouldnotbeincludedinthislistsbutarguethatthose includedarenottransitonly Sharedprojectsthatmoveeveryonefasterbelongonthelist Number3SLanesonSHS119willbeexclusivelanesfortransit RTDneedstocommittoBRToperatingfundsoncethesecapital projectsaredone WhywasIS70fromIS25toColoradotakenoffthelist CDOThasabridgeenterprisefundthatwillbuildthatsectionofIS70 thoughitwilluseallthebridgeenterprisefundforabout8years HopethatadditionalfundingwillcomefromDRCOG Thisisahighprofileprojectbutarewemissinganopportunitytogetpublic supportwithaprojectlikethis? Anyoneintheregionwouldagreethisprojectneedstobedone Nextmonthwewillhaveaproposalonhowtodistributetherevenuesforlocal governmentinthemetroarea NextmeetingSNovember20at9amatalocationtobedetermined

MTD DRAFT Project List October 21, 2013 # on Map 1 Project Location I-25 North ($90m in RAMP funding contingent on local support) Project Description* *CDOT s Managed Lane Policy Directive will apply to all new capacity projects listed below. 1) Provide continuous managed lane network from 120th to SH66. Would tie in to current project on I-25 that is constructing these additional lanes from US36 to 120 th. a) Additional lane from 120 th to SH7 b) GP lane conversion OR additional lane from SH7 to SH66 c) Design funding for SH66-north Project Cost (mil) a) $55 b) $20-$75 c) $15 Quadrant/ County Adams 2 SH7 (I-25 to Boulder) 2) Additional improvements from US 36 to SH 7 as identified in current PEL study. Estimated cost dependent upon actual configuration. Implement strategies identified in SH7 study including widening, intersection improvements, and bike, pedestrian and transit improvements. Reconstruct I-25/SH 7 interchange. $78 $178 Boulder/Broomfield 6 I-25 bidirectional managed lanes (DUS to US36) Convert single-direction managed lanes along I-25 to bi-directional for improved mobility. Cost dependent on actual configuration. $200 Denver/Adams 7 I-70 (Colorado Blvd to Tower Rd) Widen and reconstruct I-70 in its current alignment from Colorado Blvd to Tower Road with new lanes to improve mobility, travel time, reliability and safety on the corridor. $860 Denver/Arapahoe 8 I-70 and Kipling Interchange Reconstruct interchange and bridges to relieve congestion and improve safety at interchange at on/off ramps on interstate. $50 9 SH93 (Golden) (Received $20m RAMP funding for US6 and 19th interchange) 10 Realign and widen mainline SH93 in Golden. Additional lanes (one in each direction) would be managed. US-6 and Wadsworth Interchange Reconstruct interchange to improve safety and relieve congestion. $62 11 C-470 Segment 1 (Received $100m in RAMP funding for I-25 to Platte River) $85 Complete Segment 1 from Platte River to Kipling. $100 South Metro/ Douglas 12 C-470 Segment 2 Build one additional lane between Kipling and I-70 to address congestion and safety. $300 Arapahoe Interchange 13 (Received $50.4m in RAMP funding) Reconstruct the I-25 and Arapahoe interchange to accommodate current and future high traffic volumes and improve safety at a $65 million cost (RAMP Candidate). South Metro/ $65 South Metro/ Arapahoe 14 I-270 I-270 widen to add one additional lane each direction from I-76 to I-70 $260 Adams 15 I-270 and Vasquez Interchange reconstruction $50 Adams 16 I-25 Valley Highway Stage 2.0 Finishes interchange at Alameda and provides new on-ramp and new bridges across river. $27 Denver 17 I-25 Valley Highway Stage 3.0 Reconstruct/widen I-25 from Santa Fe to 8th Ave (lane balancing). $50 Denver 18 I-25/I-225 Eliminate bottleneck and weave at DTC Boulevard $40 19 I-25 Widening (Plum Creek to Monument Hill) Address future congestion area btwn Plum Creek and Monument Hill due to wider sections of interstate at north and the south end of this stretch. Funding would implement outcomes of a study. $60 South Metro/ Arapahoe South Metro/ Douglas 20 I-70 Westbound (Floyd Hill to Idaho Springs) Highway and tunnel widening from Floyd Hill to Idaho Springs. $300 Clear Creek 21 US285/Pine Junction 22 23 US85 (Louviers to Sedalia) SH86 (Founders Pkwy to Woodlands Blvd) Grade separate interchange, add bridge and ramps at Pine Junction. Reconstruct and widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Louviers to Sedalia. Concrete reconstruction from Founders Pkwy to Woodlands Blvd. $20 South Metro $25 South Metro $11 South Metro TOTAL $2.85-$2.90b* Transit Projects with Specific Associated Road Improvements* * Initial examples, specific metro transit improvements subject to NAMS/RTD Review 3 SH119: Boulder Diagonal Hwy (Received $4.456m in RAMP funding for 30th to Foothills Pkwy multimodal improvements) 4 US36 Establish multimodal corridor through BRT, queue jumps and bus lanes.* 1) BRT improvements north of Table Mesa: continues BRT capital improvements into Boulder to improve travel time and reliability. The project is scalable.* 2) Corridor-wide Connections to Bus Rapid Transit --implement facility and program Final Mile improvements to better connect RTD riders to/from the US 36 BRT stations and the surrounding activity centers. TBD estimate will reflect highway elements Boulder Boulder 5 US-287 Create multi-modal corridor and enhance bus transit system to improve corridor mobility. Boulder, Larimer Additional Projects as Requested by CDOT or Local Governments; Not Yet Approved by MTD SH 42 (Paschal to Locke) (requested by Louisville/Boulder Co) Intersection, bicycle, and pedestrian improvements to upgrade SH 42 in Louisville, from a rural undivided two- lane highway to a continuous context sensitive, urban, divided twolane highway with one travel lane in each direction, a raised median, and a left- turn lane. $17.4 North Metro/Boulder County *Expected statewide revenue over 10 years = $2.43b