The Use of Radioactive Sources in Troubleshooting Gas Plant Problems. By Waleed J. Georgie PRIMAS (Oil & Gas) Consultancy, Aberdeen, Scotland

Similar documents
PTRT 2470: Petroleum Data Management 3 - Facilities Test 4 (Spring 2017)

Gas Conditioning & Processing

Pipeline Flooding, Dewatering and Venting Dr Aidan O'Donoghue, Pipeline Research Limited, Glasgow, Scotland

OIL AND GAS SEPARATION DESIGN MANUAL

--- III. itti A. on_ coo. & EP Department DOCUMENT NO: WOC-HSE-ST Section H005 Hydrates

Caltec. The world leader in Surface Jet Pump (SJP) and compact separation systems for upstream oil and gas production enhancement

Training Fees 4,000 US$ per participant for Public Training includes Materials/Handouts, tea/coffee breaks, refreshments & Buffet Lunch.

USING HAZOP TO IDENTIFY AND MINIMISE HUMAN ERRORS IN OPERATING PROCESS PLANT

An Investigation of Liquid Injection in Refrigeration Screw Compressors

Case Study 1: Nucleonic gauges provide accurate and reliable alarm solutions

INNOVATIVE GAS-LIQUID SEPARATOR INCREASES GAS PRODUCTION IN THE NORTH SEA

Level, Pressure, and Density Instrumentation for the Petrochemical Industry

HOW TO NOT MEASURE GAS - ORIFICE. Dee Hummel. Targa Resources

DEHYDRATION OF ACID GAS PRIOR TO INJECTION Eugene W. Grynia, John J. Carroll, Peter J. Griffin, Gas Liquids Engineering, Calgary, Canada

Optimizing Effective Absorption during Wet Natural Gas Dehydration by Tri Ethylene Glycol

Tube rupture in a natural gas heater

Yutaek Seo. Subsea Engineering

I. Nieuwoudt, O. Karpilovskiy and M. J. Lockett, Koch-Glitsch LP, USA,

The Use of Ultrasonic Inspections at Elevated Temperature

PE096: Overview of Gas Processing Technology

From the Choke KO drum, the gas passes through another gas/gas exchanger - the 'LTS Pre-cooler'.

New power in production logging

Helium Leak Detection in High Pressure Urea Reactor

Technical Standards and Legislation: Risk Based Inspection. Presenter: Pierre Swart

1 PIPESYS Application

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM MODIFICATIONS TO DEW POINT CONTROL PROCESS

OIL AND GAS PROCESSES AND EMISSIONS

PROCESS GAS SAMPLING SYSTEMS

Unit 1 Fire Engineering Science

ONLINE MEASUREMENTS OF LIQUID CARRY-OVER FROM SCRUBBERS USING RADIOACTIVE TRACERS. Are Haugan. Sindre Hassflell

Controlling Benzene Exposure

GAS LIFT IN NEW FIELDS

Cold-acclimatised pipelines

Improving Performance of Gas Lift Compressors in Liquids-Rich Gas Service

A Sub-Synchronous Vibration Problem: Trapped Fluid in Compressor Coupling Spacer. Diagnosis and Resolution

Courses of Instruction: Controlling and Monitoring of Pipelines

Screw Gas Compressors & Dry Gas Seals Applications. Singapore, Mandarin Orchard Singapore. Training Course : Training Course For One Week In

Removing nitrogen. Nitrogen rejection applications can be divided into two categories

BRINGING A NEW DIMENSION TO PIPELINE PIGGING. By: David Aitken, Aubin Group, UK

Vortex Separation Technologies. Engineered Solutions to Separation Problems

GAS DEHYDRATION SYSTEM

Double Emulsion Droplet generation and collection protocol Version Author Date Reviewer Change 1 Introduction

Pigging as a Flow Assurance Solution Avoiding Slug Catcher Overflow

Improving distillation tower operation

Overview. OPIPOH10 - SQA Unit Code HG Operate an Oil and Gas Process ( Gas Treatment)

Gas Injection for Hydrodynamic Slug Control

80% Less installation time with just two welds for fast and efficient installation.

Transient Analyses In Relief Systems

PIG MOTION AND DYNAMICS IN COMPLEX GAS NETWORKS. Dr Aidan O Donoghue, Pipeline Research Limited, Glasgow

Offshore Equipment. Yutaek Seo

Training Title IDENTIFY OPERATIONAL UPSETS, REVIEW & VALIDATE IN OIL & CHEMICAL PLANTS

CEE 452/652. Week 9, Lecture 2 Absorption. Dr. Dave DuBois Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute

PITFALLS OF RUNNING CONVENTIONAL PRODUCTION LOGGING IN HORIZONTAL/HIGHLY DEVIATED WELLS: A CASE STUDY

Practical Modelling & Hazard Assessment of LPG & LNG Spills

Simplicity in VRU by using a Beam Gas Compressor

Hydro Plant Risk Assessment Guide

GAS COMPRESSION SYSTEM

DISTILLATION POINTS TO REMEMBER

80% Less installation time with just two welds for fast and efficient installation.

T e l N o : F a x N o : E m a i l : a i s h c m c - m e. c o m w w w. c m c - m e.

Gas Gathering System Modeling The Pipeline Pressure Loss Match

Relief Systems. 11/6/ Fall

High Efficiency SO2 Scrubber Design to Reduce Caustic Consumption

Minimum standard of competence in advanced training for liquefied gas tanker cargo operations (STCW Reg V/1-2)

Start up XXX from normal shutdown Introduction

ANNEX AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CODE FOR FIRE SAFETY SYSTEMS (FSS CODE) CHAPTER 15 INERT GAS SYSTEMS

Drilling Efficiency Utilizing Coriolis Flow Technology

UNDERSTANDING WET GAS IN A SUPERCRITICAL CO 2 CYCLE. Melissa Poerner, P.E. Grant Musgrove Griffin Beck Craig J. Nolen Southwest Research Institute

Multifunctional Screw Compressor Rotors

From the Wellhead to the Tanker Offshore Production Systems. 28/03/2014 Instituto Superior Técnico

Liquid Ring Compressor Catching Chemicals Conserving Cash

Effect of noise in the performance of the transducers in an ultrasonic flow meter of natural gas

SEMIC05 Installing mechanical equipment

OTC Copyright 2001, Offshore Technology Conference

CHE 306 Stagewise Operations

Finding leaks in Main Cryogenic Heat Exchangers without shutdown

SUPERSONIC GAS TECHNOLOGIES

Periodical surveys of cargo installations on ships carrying liquefied gases in bulk

MU102: Mechanical Seals Applications for Rotating Machinery

PREPARING SOLUBILITY DATA FOR USE UPDATING KEY RESOURCES BY THE GAS PROCESSING INDUSTRY:

Sarah N. S. All-Said Noor * ; Dr. Mohammed S. Al-Jawad ** ; Dr. Abdul Aali Al- Dabaj ***

OLGA. The Dynamic Three Phase Flow Simulator. Input. Output. Mass transfer Momentum transfer Energy transfer. 9 Conservation equations

Flowatch Multiphase Flow Meter

FAQs about Directive 017

Chapter 8: Reservoir Mechanics

PETROLEUM & GAS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY (PTT 365) SEPARATION OF PRODUCED FLUID

Maintenance and Troubleshooting of Pneumatic Conveying Systems for Sand in a Foundry

Periodic Survey of Fuel Installations on Ships other than Liquefied Gas Carriers utilizing gas or other low flash point fuels

At the end of this lesson, you will be able to do the following:

Introduction. S. James Zhou, Howard Meyer, Dennis Leppin and Shiguang Li Gas Technology Institute Benjamin Bikson and Yong Ding PoroGen Corporation

CRYSTALLIZATION FOULING IN PACKED COLUMNS

ONSHORE GAS GATHERING FAQS

CO 2 refrigeration in warm climates. Copyright 2012 shecco All rights reserved.

RMAG, Snowbird, UT, October 6-9, Michael Holmes, Antony M. Holmes, and Dominic I. Holmes, Digital Formation, Inc.

ERTC PETROCHEMICAL Conference 20 st -22 nd February 2002, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Digester Processes. 1. Raw Sludge Pumping System

STUDY OF SLUG CONTROL TECHNIQUES IN PIPELINE SYSTEMS

FUNDAMENTAL SAFETY OVERVIEW VOLUME 2: DESIGN AND SAFETY CHAPTER F: CONTAINMENT AND SAFEGUARD SYSTEMS 7. CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM (EVU [CHRS])

Products for Cryogenic Applications

METHODS TO PREVENT THE PREMATURE ACTIVATION OF RELIEF DEVICES ON TRANSPORT TANKS

Transcription:

The Use of Radioactive Sources in Troubleshooting Gas Plant Problems By Waleed J. Georgie PRIMAS (Oil & Gas) Consultancy, Aberdeen, Scotland Introduction Liquid carry over in gas treatment facilities can cause major problems in operating gas re-compression trains, gas dehydration systems, and gas sweetening plants. Carry over can be either light in the form of either condensate droplets or oil droplets; or heavy carry over in the form of foam. In addition, with gas condensate operation, retrograde liquid carry over can often influence the operation of the gas treatment plant. All forms of carry over can cause operation problems to a certain degree or another, including damage to compressor seals as well as mechanical damage to the metal parts of the compressor. In addition, gas plant carry over will cause production limitations in the plant. Poor performance of gas dehydration can be caused by either poor design of the dehydration tower or the poor design of the facilities upstream of the dehydration system. Similar problems can be experienced with the operation of the Sweetening plants. There are different techniques in identifying and resolving issues associated to gas plant operational problems caused by carry over or poor design of treatment vessels. Among these techniques are modelling, gathering plant data, and gas and liquid sampling. However, it has been demonstrated that the online monitoring of a system where flow behaviour within the pipe work and vessels are assessed and measured, a picture can be established on the real cause of a problem in the form of graphical plots. This paper will address the online techniques used in trouble shooting carry over problems, to distinguish between the condensate carry over from retrograde condensate as well as determining the flow characteristic of the gas and condensate in process vessels. Consequently, the data generated from these studies together with other evaluation programmes were used to optimise and improve the overall operation of the production facilities. Type of Radioactive Measurements Technique Basically there are two basic radioactive measurement techniques, which have been utilised in the industry in assessing carry over, flow behaviour and conditions within the separators. These are based on: 1. Sealed sources which can be used to scan vessels and pipe systems. This technique if applied correctly will provide an internal picture of the conditions within the vessel or the pipe work. This can be in the form of level irregularities, change of flow characteristic, in term of slugging of carry over. The principle of the measurement is based on the Gamma radiation penetrating the metal and any other media inside the metal surface. The level of radiation intensity penetrated through the media will be a function of the density of the media as described in the following equation:

I = I O e rmx Using the information from the scan, a plot is generated from the measurement and the conditions of the system can be established on the conditions of the system. A typical scan of the glycol contactor with the data generated is illustrated in Figure 1. 2. Unsealed sources in the form of radioactive tracers, which can be used to assess carry over, flow regimes and calculating the retention time in the vessels. Radioactive tracers can be either aqueous phase suitable for the water phase, organic tracer suitable for the condensate and gas phase. A typical radioactive study for measuring the retention time in the system is illustrated in Figure 2. Applications for the Sealed Sources in a gas plant Sealed sources have been used in a number of applications in the gas condensate systems. Some of the applications are: 1. Scanning pipe system in order to determine the level of liquid slugging 2. Changes in the liquid and gas density was used in pipe scan in order to determine the level of carry over from upstream scrubbers 3. Change in liquid gas density was measured to determine poor distribution in split flow systems. 4. Vessel scan was used to determine actual liquid levels in gas condensate separators and scrubbers. 5. Vessel scan was used to determine the level of foam and conditions inside glycol and amine contactors. 6. Vessel scan was used in order to determine the level of icing in cold separator operated below 30 O C. 7. Scan of lines in order to measure the level of hydrate formation in the lines. The above applications have been used successfully in determining gas plant problems and consequently the required corrective actions were taken in order to optimise the operation of the plant. In most cases, the vessel scan as illustrated in Figure 3 will provide data plotted in a graphical form. The plot will clearly show changes in the density, which is indirectly, reflect on the gas and liquid distribution and demonstrated in Figures 4A and 4B. Hydrate detection is used to establish the level and position of hydrate in the pipeline as illustrated in Figure 5. Application of the Unsealed sources in a gas plant Unsealed sources have been used in gas condensate production facilities in order to determine mal distribution, flow regimes and identify carry over of liquid in the gas phase or gas carry under in the liquid phase. Some of the applications are: 1. Flow regimes and distribution of the different phases in the Glycol and amine contactors.

2. Carry over in condensate stabilising train. 3. Carry over and formation of liquid retrograde in gas plant 4. Gas carry under in process stabilising train 5. Performance of different internal devices, by means of establishing the flow regime within the separators 6. Determine the retention time of different phases in the separator. Radioactive tracer injection normally applied and monitored through out the gas plant, as illustrated in Figure 6. Both sealed radioactive sources and radioactive tracers have been used in the process. Each technique has its own benefits and limitations. In some cases conventional and other alternative techniques can not be used as effective in determining both qualitatively and semi quantitatively the level of carry over in gas condensate system. The interpretation of the data is critical in gaining the full benefit of any study. In general, the data can be quantified to a certain degree if a known base line and reference points are established. This was proven to be very challenging task, but with careful planning, a base line and reference point readings can be established.

Figure 1: Vessel scan of the Glycol contactor and the interpretation of the data GAMMA SOURCE DEMISTER CLEAR PADVAPOUR SPACE LIQUID ON TRAY LIGHT FOAM HEAVY FOAM GAMMA DETECTOR MISSING TRAY TRAY DEBRIS HIGH LIQUID LEVEL TRAY FLOODED LIQUID WEEPING BASE LEVEL DETECTOR RESPONSE

Figure 2: Radioactive tracer applied in process system in order to establish flow regimes, carry over and retention time TRACER INJECTION POINT VESSEL DETECTOR D1 VOLUME V DETECTOR D2 1 2 DATA DISPLAY CONC TIME t EXCELLENT MIXING TIME t INTERMEDIATE MIXING TIME t MINIMAL MIXING (PLUG FLOW)

Figure 3: Typical scan configuration for vessels or pipe line RESPONSE IN AIR RESPONSE THROUGH WALLS REDUCTION DUE TO EXTRA METAL REDUCTION DUE TO LIQUID

Figure 4A; The plot generated from a vessel scan which then can be interpret to liquid and foam levels 2ND STAGE SEPARATOR GAMMA SCANS Fig.2 100000 TOP OF VESSEL UPPER EXTENT OF FOAM BOTTOM OF VESSEL 10000 Radiation Intensity (counts / 10 sec) INDICATED LIQUID LEVEL 1000 100 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Elevation (mm) 21/11 12:00 21/11 19:20 22/11 08:20 22/11 12:33 22/11 15:25 07/12 13:00 14/01 15:25 0

Figure 4B: The Profile established from Vessel Scan EMPTY VESSEL VAPOUR LIQUID VAPOU R FOAM LIQUID

Figure 5: Detection as a function of density in the pipeline HYDRATE DETECTION 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 Density(g/cc) 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 8.756 8.41 7.758 7.4987.047 7.02 7.016 6.9346.824 6.821 6.681 6.6786.675 5.016 5.004 4.907 4.82 4.73 4.65 4.62 4.573 4.337 4.225 4.0832.442 2.434 2.078 2.0231.984 1.872 1.801 1.7531.649 1.2 1.085 KP

Figure 6: Typical arrangements for applying radio active tracer in gas plant INJECTION POINT COOLER LP SCRUB BER HP SCRUBBE R GLYCOL CONTACTOR C O O L E INJECTION POINT COM P