(PLANT MIXED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (MSCR)). REVISED 02/03/17 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS.

Similar documents
Item 585 Ride Quality for Pavement Surfaces

MNDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL

State of Nevada Department of Transportation Materials Division

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

Real-Time Smoothness Measurements on Concrete Pavements During Construction

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIDE QUALITY SPECIFICATION AND CASE STUDIES

FOR LOOP RAMPS-TAPERED DECELERATION LANE

OPERATING INERTIAL PROFILERS AND EVALUATING PAVEMENT PROFILES

North Dakota Department of Transportation. Certification Renewal Program Flexible Pavement Smoothness Tolerance

1. SCOPE 2. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS. 2.1 SC Test Methods SC-T Forms SCDOT Electronic Forms SUMMARY OF TEST METHOD

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

Chapter 3 Tex-1001-S, Operating Inertial Profilers and Evaluating Pavement Profiles

Tex-1001-S, Operating Inertial Profilers and Evaluating Pavement Profiles. Chapter 10 Special Procedures. Overview

FREEWAY AND SERVICE ROAD CONNECTIONS

9 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Quality Assurance

The first lift, mainline, shall be placed using a spray paver.

An Overview of Mn/DOT s Pavement Condition Rating Procedures and Indices (September 2015)

Figure 1: Graphical definitions of superelevation in terms for a two lane roadway.

Evaluation of the Wisconsin DOT Walking Profiler

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 7581 Performance Based Vegetation Management

An Overview of Mn/DOT s Pavement Condition Rating Procedures and Indices (March 27, 2003)

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

Asphalt Mixture Quality Assurance

Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Quality Assurance

Technical Memorandum. Subject: Interchange Ramp Terminal Configuration. Expiration. Implementation. Introduction

SECTION 1A NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE GEOMETRIC DESIGN

Illini Union Champaign, IL. February 24, Paul Lorton, P.E. Safety Programs Unit Chief IDOT, Division of Highways, Bureau of Safety Engineering

BI-DIRECTIONALS FREE-ACCESS

Airfield Pavement Smoothness Airport Pavement Workshop. Michael Gerardi APR Consultants

TRAFFIC STUDY. Birch Bluff Road / Pleasant Avenue 01/15/2018. City of Tonka Bay 4901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN WSB PROJECT NO.

PERMANENT PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN

Driveway Design Criteria

Using Real-Time Smoothness Measurements to Improve the Initial Smoothness of Portland Cement Concrete Pavement SHRP2 Solutions Webinar 13 November

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

BEST PRACTICE FOR COMPACTING WARM AND HOT MIX ASPHALT NEAUPG OCTOBER 7,2009

Asphalt Mixture Quality Acceptance

County of Sacramento Standard Construction Specifications January 1, 2008 TECHNICAL PROVISIONS

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

Restoration Requirements

Access Management Standards

RE: 2007 NPA Text (Clean Version)

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION. Asphalt Update. Howie Moseley State Bituminous Materials Engineer

SECTION 48 - TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP

PENNDOT HPMS DATA COLLECTION GUIDE. Bureau of Planning and Research Transportation Planning Division April 2016 (Updated March 2018)

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

50 Year Roads: Don't Accept Anything Less

PENNDOT HPMS DATA COLLECTION GUIDE

"Emul Asph (SS-1HP) Tack".

Summary of Findings Concerning Longitudinal Cracking on 16' Wide Ramps

SECTION 48 - TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Analysis for Corridor Planning Projects

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Revised Specifications Highlights. David Wang State Construction Office Feb.23, 2010

FOR HISTORICAL REFERENCE ONLY

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (13-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Team #5888 Page 1 of 16

Use of Roller Compacted Concrete By GDOT. Presented By: Joe W. Sheffield, PE Georgia Department of Transportation District Engineer, Tifton, GA

Module 5: Navigating Roadways

MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION PLANS FOR PROPOSED STATE HIGHWAY DESIGN DESIGNATION INDEX OF SHEETS LENGTH OF PROJECT SHEET 1 COUNTY

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

ADA Training Standard Plans


Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

The major street is typically the intersecting street with greater traffic volume, larger cross-section, and higher functional class.

Shared Use Path Design

BARRIER OFFSET 0" A 6" 6" A 12" 12" A 26" A 26" 3A OR 4A L OR S * ** L OR S L OR S

DRAFT WSDOT PAVEMENT POLICY

Defining Purpose and Need

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

General Notes. Project No /15/2018 Page 1 of 1

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 613 IMPACT ATTENUATOR WORK DESCRIPTION 3

MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION PLANS FOR PROPOSED STATE HIGHWAY DESIGN DESIGNATION INDEX OF SHEETS LENGTH OF PROJECT SHEET 1 COUNTY

Niantic Center Elementary School

Field guide for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way Edition

Training Strategies and Materials

PERMANENT PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

KDOT Access Management Policy (AMP)

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

SUPERPAVE Construction Lessons Learned. NEAUPG Annual Meeting Wilkes-Barre, PA October 23, 2003

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

FREEWAY WORK ZONE SPEED MODEL DOCUMENTATION

Act 47 Exception Application Process (Permitting Bicycle Travel on Freeways)

Non-State Federal Aid Highways. Pavement Condition Ratings. H e r k i m e r a n d O n e i d a C o u n t i e s

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

Edge Wedge 150 lb/ft 3

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

PERMANENT PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN

MnROAD Mainline IRI Data and Lane Ride Quality MnROAD Lessons Learned December 2006

ATT-59, Part I. ATT-59/99, SMOOTHNESS OF PAVEMENTS Part I, Manual Profilograph. b) Determining the Profile Index from profilograms

Design Overview. Section 4 Standard Plans for Design. Pedestrian Access Routes. Pedestrian Access Routes. Overview. Cross Slope

Le Sueur County, MN Tuesday, December 13, 2016 Board Meeting

Purpose and Need Report. Appendix B. Purpose and Need Report

September 2008 REVISIONS (1) SYMMETRICAL VERTICAL CURVE EQUATIONS 12.5(12) VERTICAL CURVE COMPUTATIONS 12.5(14) TURNING LANE LENGTHS 15.

Updated There is no park access points beyond the limit of the phase I work. roadway to be constructed Viewport has been along full limits of the park

Transcription:

S-1 (2399) PAVEMENT SURFACE SMOOTHNESS Use this with SP2016-115 (CONCRETE PAVEMENT) (unless it s an alternate job) and SP2016-137.1 (PLANT MIXED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (MSCR)). REVISED 02/03/17 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS. SP2016-143 MnDOT 2399 is hereby modified as follows: S-1.1 MnDOT 2399.2.A shall be deleted and replaced with the following: A Inertial Profiler (IP) Provide a Department certified, calibrated, and documented IP meeting the requirements of ASTM E 950, Class 1 and procedures maintained by the MnDOT Pavement Engineering Section. Refer to the procedures maintained by the MnDOT Pavement Engineering Section or to the MnDOT Smoothness website for the required settings for individual certified IPs. Provide an IP capable of producing a profilogram and exporting raw profile data in an unfiltered electronic Engineering Research Division (ERD) file format. Produce ERD filenames in the YYMMDD- T-N-D-L-B-E.ERD standardized format in accordance with Table 2399-1: Table 2399-1 Standardized Naming Convention for ERD Files Abbreviation Definition YY Two-digit year MM Month (include leading zeros) DD Day of month (include leading zeros) T Route type (I, MN, US, CSAH, etc.) Route number (no leading zeros) and auxiliary ID (if N applicable) D Primary route direction (I or D) Lane number (1 for driving lane, increasing by one for each L lane to the left; 0 for other lanes such as acceleration/deceleration lanes, ramps, loops) B Beginning station E End station S-1.2 MnDOT 2399.2.D.5 shall be deleted and replaced with the following: D.5 After Corrective Work After reprofiling, submit a paper summary ProVAL report for each lane, indicating the results of updated Smoothness Assurance analyses to the Engineer. Submit the appropriate MnDOT Profile Summary worksheet available on the MnDOT Smoothness website. The worksheet should match the type of construction and the letting year of the project. S-1.3 MnDOT 2399.3.A shall be deleted and replaced with the following: A Pavement Surface Testing Remove objects and foreign material from the pavement surface before performing the pavement surface evaluation. Provide traffic control required for testing and performing corrective work on the final pavement surface. lane. Run the IP in the direction of traffic. Measure profiles in the left and right wheel paths of each Test and evaluate each lane separately. The Engineer will determine the length in miles of each mainline traffic lane. Operate the IP at the optimum speed as recommended by the manufacturer. Separate each lane into segments 0.1 mi in length. Evaluate the remainder segment less than 0.1 mi in each lane as an independent segment. The Engineer will prorate pay adjustments for length.

Make each pass continuously, regardless of length, and end passes before exclusions in accordance with Table 2399-3, Areas Excluded from Smoothness and ALR Evaluation. Begin each subsequent pass 50 ft before, and including, construction headers and end of day work joints. For percent improvement projects, measure Smoothness before the beginning of construction and after the completion of construction. Use the same stationing for the final profiling as the stationing used for the initial profiling to allow for a direct comparison of Smoothness when calculating the percent improvement. Measure the Smoothness Before Paving and the Smoothness After Paving values with the same IP. The Engineer will use a 10 ft straightedge to measure for surface deviations in accordance with 2301, Concrete Pavement, and 2360, Plant Mixed Asphalt Pavement. S-1.4 MnDOT 2399.3.B shall be deleted and replaced with the following: B Exclusions Table 2399-2 indicates areas that are excluded from Smoothness evaluation, but still require measurement with an IP, and are subject to evaluation for ALR and the 10 ft straightedge. Table 2399-3 indicates areas that are excluded from surface testing with the IP, but are subject to evaluation with the 10 ft straightedge. Table 2399-2 Areas Excluded from Smoothness Evaluation For All Pavements Paving in areas with a posted vehicle speed less than or equal to 45 mph Ramps and loops Acceleration and deceleration lanes less than or equal to 1,000 ft in length Projects less than 1,000 ft in length For Bituminous Pavements Single lift overlays placed directly on concrete For Concrete Pavements Intersections constructed under traffic begin and end exclusion 100 ft from the intersection radius Doweled shoulders greater than or equal to 10 ft in width Table 2399-3 Areas Excluded from Smoothness and ALR Evaluation For All Pavements Paving in areas with a posted vehicle speed less than or equal to 35 mph Paving in areas with a cautionary vehicle speed less than or equal to 35 mph Turn lanes, crossovers 10 ft on either side of obstructions in lane that obstruction is located Side streets, side connections 150 ft before stop signs at an intersection 150 ft before yield signs at a roundabout Bridge decks and approach panels 20 ft from bridge decks and approach panels 20 ft from terminal headers tying into existing pavement For Bituminous Pavements Paved shoulders Intersections where mainline profiles are merged or blended into the cross street profile begin and end exclusion 100 ft from the intersection radius For Concrete Pavements Doweled shoulders less than 10 ft in width Undoweled shoulders Headers adjacent to colored concrete

S-1.5 MnDOT 2399.3.D.1 shall be deleted and replaced with the following: D.1 Smoothness Evaluate Smoothness requirements using the equations and criteria in accordance with the following tables: (1) Table 2399-4 for bituminous pavements, (2) Table 2399-5 for concrete pavements, and (3) Table 2399-6 for percent improvement projects. The Engineer will base pay adjustments on the segment Smoothness value (or percent improvement value, for percent improvement projects) measured at the completion of surface pavement, unless corrective work is required by the ProVAL summary report results. If a segment is less than 100 ft in length and Table 2399-4, Table 2399-5, or Table 2399-6 requires corrective work, the Engineer will waive the corrective work requirement for the segment and instead assess a prorated disincentive. The Department will still subject the segment to ALR analysis in accordance with Table 2399-7. For segments requiring corrective work, reprofile the entire 0.1 mi segment after performing corrective work as directed by the Engineer and enter the reprofiled Smoothness values into the final Profile Summary worksheet. D.1.a Bituminous Pavements Table 2399-4 contains pay adjustments for bituminous pavements. See Section 2360, Plant Mixed Asphalt Pavement of the Special Provisions for the ride equation requirements. Table 2399-4 Smoothness s and Corrective Work for Bituminous Pavements Smoothness < 25.0 400.00 HMA-A 25.0 75.0 800.00 16.000 Smoothness > 75.0 Corrective Work to 50.0 < 30.0 270.00 HMA-B 30.0 80.0 594.00 10.800 Smoothness > 80.0 Corrective Work to 55.0 < 35.0 180.00 HMA-C 35.0 95.0 390.00 6.000 x Smoothness > 95.0 Corrective Work to 65.0 For bituminous projects, the Engineer will not pay any positive Total s if greater than 25 percent of all mainline density lots for the project fail to meet the minimum density requirements in accordance with 2360, Plant Mixed Asphalt Pavement. D.1.b Concrete Pavements

For concrete pavements, the Engineer will use equation PCC-A. Table 2399-5 Smoothness s and Corrective Work for Concrete Pavements Smoothness < 45.0 890.00 PCC-A 45.0 85.0 2892.50 44.500 Smoothness > 85.0 Corrective Work to 65.0 If the Contractor adds water to the pavement surface without approval by the Engineer, the Engineer will not pay any positive s for 0.1 mile segments where the water was added and the Engineer may reject the pavement in accordance with 1512, Unacceptable and Unauthorized Work. D.1.c Percent Improvement Projects The Engineer will base pay adjustments on the segment percent improvement values. The Engineer will calculate the percent improvement in accordance with the following equation: Smoothness Before Paving Smoothness After Paving % I = 100 Smoothness Before Paving Determine the Smoothness Before Paving value before patching or other repair. Determine the Smoothness After Paving value after the completion of paving and any corrective work. Table 2399-6 Smoothness s and Corrective Work for Percent Improvement Projects Percent Improvement (%I) > 70.0 180.00 PI 0.0 to 70.0 180.00 + 5.143 (%I) < 0.0 Corrective Work to %I of at least 0.0 For bituminous percent improvement projects, the Engineer will not pay any positive Total Pay Adjustments if greater than 25 percent of all mainline density lots for the project fail to meet minimum density requirements in accordance with 2360, Plant Mixed Asphalt Pavement. Correct segments with a percentage improvement of less than 0.0 percent at no additional cost to the Department as required by the Engineer. S-1.6 MnDOT 2399.3.D.2 shall be deleted and replaced with the following: D.2 Areas of Localized Roughness The Engineer will evaluate ALR in accordance with Table 2399-7, ALR Monetary Deductions and Corrective Work Requirements.

Table 2399-7 ALR Monetary Deductions and Corrective Work Requirements 25 ft Continuous MRI Corrective Work or Monetary Deduction, per linear 1.0 ft < 175.0 Acceptable HMA-A or HMA-B, and a posted vehicle speed > 45 mph 175.0 to < 225.0 225.0 $25.00 $125.00 < 175.0 Acceptable PCC-A and a posted vehicle speed > 45 mph 175.0 to < 225.0 $25.00 225.0 Corrective Work HMA-C, PI, ramps, loops, concrete intersections constructed under traffic, or any paving with a posted vehicle speed 45 mph < 225.0 Acceptable 225.0 $25.00 The Engineer will consider areas of ALR acceptable if the reprofiled segment contains no ALR. The Department will reduce payment for ALR remaining after reprofiling as determined by the Engineer and in accordance with Table 2399-7, ALR Monetary Deductions and Corrective Work Requirements. S-1.7 MnDOT 2399.3.D.3 shall be deleted.