APPENDIX 11 WIND EFFECTS ASSESSMENT

Similar documents
Appendix 7. Wind and Comfort Impact Analysis

Donald Ballanti, Certified Consulting Meteorologist, Wind Impact Evaluation for the Menlo Park Facebook Campus Project, August 26, 2011.

Opus Research Report D Wind Tunnel Study of the Proposed Site 10 Development, Wellington

Fig$1.!Wind!Rose!Shearwater! ! August 7th, 2015

Subject: Wind Impact Evaluation for the Facebook Campus Project, Menlo Park

Wellington Street : Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment. To Whom It May Concern, RE: Proposed Wellington Street Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment

2 Bowen Crescent Residential Development, Melbourne

Dear Ms. Maw: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment St-Charles Market, 135 Barrette Street, Ottawa GWE File No.

Dear Mr. Nicolini: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment Montreal Road, Ottawa GWE File No.: DTPLW

Harriet Fraser Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning

March 25, Katherine Grechuta MCIP, RPP, LEED AP Planner FoTenn Planning & Urban Design 223 McLeod Street Ottawa, ON, K2P 0Z8. Dear Ms.

Re: Wind Impact Assessment Marina del Rey Tower Marina del Rey, California RWDI Reference No Description of Proposed Development

SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION. March 28, 2018

Strolling down the Avenue

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

12/13/2018 VIA

Your views are important. Please fill in a form before you leave. Or alternatively

01. VICINITY OF GREENBRAE POC: EXISTING CONDITIONS

31/10/17. October 31, HIP Developments Inc. 700 Rupert Street Waterloo, ON N2V 2B5

SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

Assembly Committee Document 7.5

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

June 3, Mr. Steven Grandmont, Chief Operating Officer Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4K1

APPENDIX I: ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND PROJECT CONSISTENCY STANDARDS

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK

CHAPTER 7 ACCESS MANAGEMENT. Background. Principles of Access Management. Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP)

David Hung, Associate Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA

RE: Minor Betterments Projects near William Walker Elementary

Urban Design Terms of Reference. Pedestrian. Wind Comfort and Safety Studies. June 2014

SIGNS - RULES Signs - Rules Structure of the Rules Section Activities Discretionary Activities

Wind Microclimate Assessment

Bentleigh GLEN EIRA COUNCIL TRANSFORMATIONAL CONCEPTS 15

ROUTE 81 CORRIDOR STUDY DESIGN CONCEPTS

Three Springs Design Guidelines Fencing and Wall Standards

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

Wyldewood Estates. Pre-Application Public Engagement Summary of Issues and Responses

SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION

Design Features to Change and/or Ameliorate Pedestrian Wind Conditions. Leighton Cochran 1 PhD CPEng

Compliance with Section 18-52(4) City of Thornton Development Code

DRAFT. A fifth objective, other considerations, has been added to capture considerations not captured by the four primary objectives.

Otter and Water Vole Survey Land off Harrogate Road, Spofforth

VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

2.0 Ballpark District

Highland Park Glengarry Court. Landscape design and Fencing rules

Overview. Existing Conditions. Corridor Description. Assessment

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998

Arapahoe Square Zoning + Design Standards & Guidelines Task Force Meeting 9 January 27, 2016

23/02/18. Pedestrian Wind Assessment Ladies Golf Club of Toronto Markham, Ontario Novus Project # February 23, 2018

summary of issues and opportunities

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

INNER LOOP EAST. AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 TRANSFORMATION PROJECT. Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES

Illustrated Principles of Good Planning

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } } } } } Decision and Order

Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9.

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Safety barriers surrounding a swimming pool area at 60A Goldflats Lane, Coatesville, Rodney

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

Chapter 4 Route Window C3 Hyde Park and Park Lane shafts. Transport for London

Draft Kivalina Wind Resource Report

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINE NO. 13

Appendix 5 Traffic Assessment

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION

Hewson Planning 35 Corbett Road RD2 Whangarei 082. Attachment 5. Traffic Assessment

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, Streetscape Overview Burlington Comprehensive Master Plan

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Statement of Rebuttal Evidence of Anthony Thomas Penny on Behalf of Danne Mora Holdings (#1134)

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS. That Council approve:

OPEN HOUSE WELCOME Bronte Village Growth Area Review

Appendix A Supporting Documentation of Identification and Evaluation of Alternative Solutions

Regarding the code-compliance of sliding doors that form part of a barrier to a pool at 148 Glenbrook Road, Pukekohe

The following is submitted together with the plans and application for the staff and plan commission consideration of approval.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Planning Division/Site Plan Review Committee

Hopkins Architects. University of Nottingham. University Park Campus Masterplan Strategy. 13 th February 2009

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Restricting Access to Your Swimming / Small Heated Pool Information / Checklist

WEST CENTRAL DRAFT DISTRICT PLAN SUBMISSION 3 HASSAL ST WESTMEAD

Site Improvements

Transit boulevard: A new road type for Sydney s Growth Centres

Section 14B Purpose of the Suburban Residential Zone and the Large Lot Residential Zone

Small. Regulation Reference: (see page 23 for link to the regulation)

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

Figure 4-10: Pedestrian Improvements Types of Potential Station Area Improvements - Place-Making Improvements

A plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown

North Buckhead Civic Association. Recommendations For Wieuca Road

9. Western Park (encompassing Churchill Heights)

Proposed Development by Cala Homes in Dollicott - Report o n Roads and Traffic

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE FLOW BEHAVIOUR IN A MODERN TRAFFIC TUNNEL IN CASE OF FIRE INCIDENT

10 SHERFORD Town Code

LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 516 North Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO (719) FAX (719)

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CLAY COUNTY

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2

Transcription:

APPENDIX 11 WIND EFFECTS ASSESSMENT Summerset Villages (Lower Hutt) Ltd District Plan Change Request Prepared by Urban Perspectives Ltd 17 September 2014 341 49

342

Opus Research Report 14-529D84.00 Wind Assessment of the Proposed Boulcott Retirement Village, Lower Hutt 343

Opus Research Report 14-529D84.00 Wind Assessment of the Proposed Boulcott Retirement Village, Lower Hutt Prepared By Neil Jamieson Research Leader - Aerodynamics Opus Research 33 The Esplanade, Petone PO Box 30 845, Lower Hutt 5040 New Zealand Reviewed By Telephone: +64 4 587 0600 Paul Carpenter Facsimile: +64 4 587 0604 Wind Engineering Consultant Date: 4 August 2014 Reference: 529D84.00 Status: Final 2014 344

Opus Research Report 14-529D84.00 i Contents 1. Introduction...1 2. The Site, Area and Proposed Development...1 3. Existing Wind Conditions... 5 4. Effects of the Proposed Development on Wind Conditions... 6 4.1 General... 6 4.2 Northerly Winds... 6 4.3 Southerly Winds... 8 4.4 Building Entrances... 8 5. Concluding Comments... 9 529D84.00 4 August 2014 345

Opus Research Report 14-529D84.00 1 CLIENT CONTACT Summerset Retirement Village (Lower Hutt) Ltd c/- Summerset Group Holdings Ltd P.O Box 5187 Lambton Quay Wellington Mr Vaughan Bell 1. Introduction This wind assessment describes the expected effects of the proposed Boulcott Retirement Village in Lower Hutt on wind conditions likely to be experienced by residents, neighbours and pedestrians in its vicinity. While a wind assessment or wind tunnel test is not generally required for new buildings in this area of Lower Hutt under the District Plan, this assessment is intended to form part of the assessment of environmental effects that make up the private plan change request documentation and/or application for resource consent. Its main objectives are to (1) address the questions on wind issues raised at public meetings during the consultation process, and (2) provide design advice on wind mitigation and improvement of the overall amenity, and that of specific areas for residents and visitors. The assessment report was prepared at the request of Mr Vaughan Bell on behalf of Summerset Retirement Village (Lower Hutt) Ltd. Our assessment of the expected wind effects of the proposed development is based on our wide experience of assessing wind conditions in for new buildings and additions in urban areas. No wind tunnel testing has been performed on the proposal for this assessment. A visit to the site was made on Thursday 25 th July 2013, during a period of light to moderate northerly winds. 2. The Site, Area and Proposed Development The Boulcott Retirement Village development site is located south of the new Hutt River stopbank, and is between the Boulcott s Farm Heritage Golf Course to the north, and the adjacent residential area to the south. It extends around in a rough arc between the northern end of Boulcott Street and the northern end of Military Road, and is currently largely vacant. Figure 1 shows an aerial view of the area immediately around the site. Included on this figure are the direction sectors for the prevailing wind directions in Lower Hutt shown in red, and an approximate layout for the proposed development. Figure 2 shows views of the existing situation. It can be seen from these figures that the golf course area to the north is relatively open, with trees and other vegetation being the main obstructions to the wind. To the south the buildings are generally residential houses of one or two storeys, with the most significant buildings in terms of size being those of Boulcott Primary School to the south of the site. Figure 1 shows that the anticipated development can be roughly split into two areas, one to the east of the narrow pinch point near the centre of the site, and one to the west. The area to the east of this midpoint will comprise of residential blocks made up of one and two storey elements. The area to the west of the midpoint will comprise of larger elements, both in terms of height and area, with these ranging up to four storeys in height and in close proximity to the north boundary. These will step up in height towards the centre of this space, with the four-storey blocks being opposite the Boulcott Primary School playing fields. These blocks are approximately square in plan, and are comprised of ground level carparking with three levels of apartments/care facilities above. An 529D84.00 4 August 2014 346

Opus Research Report 14-529D84.00 2 internal driveway will which connect through to Boulcott Street and Military Road. There is also a pedestrian walkway connecting the site through to Hathaway Ave. 529D84.00 4 August 2014 347

Opus Research Report 14-529D84.00 3 Figure 1. Aerial view of the site and the surrounding area (also shows (1) the prevailing wind directions for strong winds, (2) the location of the development site and its main building elements, and (3) the storey heights of these elements) 529D84.00 4 August 2014 348

Opus Research Report 14-529D84.00 4 (a) View looking approximately west from near the Military Rd end of the site (b) View looking northeast from near the Boulcott St end of the site Figure 2. Views of the existing situation 529D84.00 4 August 2014 349

Opus Research Report 14-529D84.00 5 3. Existing Wind Conditions Prevailing strong winds over Lower Hutt are dominated by flows from either approximately northerly or southerly directions. Wind flows are similar to those over the Wellington region in general, with the addition of significant sheltering and channelling effects. The hills that line the west side of the Hutt Valley provide considerable shelter from northerly winds. The hills on both sides of the valley channel northerly winds to some degree, but have more impact on southerly winds. Lower Hutt itself is relatively exposed to southerly wind flows. While northerlies usually occur more frequently than southerlies for light to moderate winds, the highest wind speeds generally occur with about the same frequency for both direction sectors. Strong southerly winds are usually noticed more by pedestrians because they are often also cold and wet. Local pedestrian level wind conditions in this part of Lower Hutt are primarily determined by a combination of four factors. The most significant of these are: (1) the sizes and locations of open spaces, e.g. the golf course, and (2) the sizes, locations, orientations, and heights, of the buildings in the immediate area. The other secondary factors are (3) the alignment of streets relative to the prevailing wind directions, and (4) the local topography, primarily the new stopbank. With reference to Figure 1, the development site is relatively exposed to winds from the north, receiving only very limited shelter from the existing trees on the golf course and from the new raised stopbank. It generally receives somewhat more shelter from southerly winds from the residential buildings and associated trees, other lower plantings, and fences. These shelter effects are lower around the Boulcott St end of the site, and adjacent to the Boulcott Primary School playing fields. Gust wind speeds in the pedestrian areas around and close to the site are assessed to currently range from very low in sheltered areas to high in more exposed locations, as described in Table 1. Typically they are highest in the larger open spaces, around the windward corners of the more exposed buildings, and through some of the narrower gaps between buildings. Generally, the ranges of wind speeds and the overall average wind speeds are expected to be higher for northerly winds than southerly winds because of the shelter effects described above. Table 1: Gust Wind Speed Range Descriptions Wind Speed Range 11m/s and below 12-14m/s 15-17m/s 18-20m/s 21-23m/s 24-26m/s 27m/s and above Description very low low moderate moderately high high very high extremely high 529D84.00 4 August 2014 350

Opus Research Report 14-529D84.00 6 4. Effects of the Proposed Development on Wind Conditions 4.1 General New buildings, as well as changes and additions to existing buildings, can have a significant impact on wind conditions in the surrounding areas. New buildings or additions to buildings occupy space and force wind that would normally flow through this space to take other paths. Wind flows can be deflected down from higher levels into adjacent areas. They can also be channelled through gaps between buildings, or accelerated around corners. Some of the worst wind conditions occur where these vertical and horizontal wind flows combine, most often around the windward corners and sides of a building. However, new buildings or additions will not always cause local wind conditions to deteriorate. New buildings can often provide increased shelter to some areas, generally those immediately downwind. They can also potentially keep wind flows away from pedestrian areas, either by deflecting them into lesser used areas, or well above ground level. Accordingly, new building developments can cause wind speeds to increase in some areas, and to decrease in other areas. These effects can be particularly significant when a new building occupies a vacant or largely vacant site, as is the case here. The following assessment of the effects of the proposed development on wind conditions has been divided into sections relating to northerly winds and southerly winds, and further divided into those areas outside the site, i.e. the neighbouring residential areas and the golf course, and the area of the site itself. 4.2 Northerly Winds 4.2.1 Areas outside the site Eastern Section of the Site In northerly winds the effects on wind conditions in areas outside the site are generally expected to be small. The one and two storey blocks that make up the eastern section of the development will actually provide some additional shelter for the neighbouring properties. This should be further enhanced by any proposed planting in this area, and if there is also a more or less continuous line of fencing between the development and the neighbouring properties to the south. Western Section of the Site Most of the buildings making up the western section of the site are both larger in plan, and taller in height, than the buildings on the eastern section. Consequently, it would usually be expected that they could potentially have a much greater impact on wind conditions in properties to the south of the site. The taller buildings have been concentrated in the centre of this western section, with the lower buildings being the ones that are located closer to the nearby residential buildings. Lower buildings typically have less impact on pedestrian wind speeds than taller buildings of the same plan area. Other factors will also contribute to ameliorating the potential wind effects for neighbouring properties, depending on how they are included in the final design. The internal link road provides some separation between the taller buildings of the development and the neighbouring houses, 529D84.00 4 August 2014 351

Opus Research Report 14-529D84.00 7 which is beneficial in that the effects of buildings on the wind diminish with distance. Any planting that is included along the southern edge of the internal link road and around the development buildings will also be beneficial, with the potential benefits generally increasing with higher density of planting, and being generally greater if the trees and shrubs are evergreen. Similarly, creating a largely consistent line of fencing around 1.8m to 2m high between the site and the neighbouring properties would also provide additional shelter. For most wind directions and wind conditions, the size and bulk of the taller buildings on the western section of the site should provide overall more shelter for downstream areas, including neighbouring properties, than currently exists. However, as noted above, there are likely to be some limited effects that could be substantially ameliorated or mitigated through refinement of the design. The Golf Course There will be no impact on wind conditions on the neighbouring golf course (despite the proximity of 4 storey buildings), as this area is located upstream of the development, and is also somewhat separated from it by the raised stopbank. 4.2.2 On-site areas Eastern Section of the Site Wind conditions around the buildings on the eastern section of the site will be mostly similar to those currently experienced by the existing residential blocks adjacent to the golf course. They could be improved by planting and fencing in the areas between the new buildings and the stopbank. Western Section of the Site There are elements in the development design that could be refined or incorporated to improve the amenity for residents and visitors to the site. These relate more to external landscaping, screening and fencing, rather than changes to the building configurations. The first area to consider is the space between the stopbank and the buildings. The greater the height and density of the landscaping (trees, shrubbery and fencing) in this area the more shelter will be afforded to both the pedestrians and the buildings. The next area to consider is around the windward corners of the buildings, which is where wind speeds around buildings are generally highest. There are some building design options that could potentially help to reduce wind speeds in these areas. However often the simplest and most effective option is to use planting, screening, or a combination of these or similar elements, to keep people away from the windward building corners. Following this are the areas between the buildings. Northerly wind flows will be channelled between them. Accordingly, screening or planting could be used to provide shelter in these spaces. This could be spread out, in an attempt to shelter the entire area, or it could be more targeted to provide shelter for selected areas or pedestrian routes. The area along the southern sides of the larger buildings, adjacent to the internal link road has the potential to be reasonably well sheltered with the combination of shelter from the buildings, and any proposed landscaping. 529D84.00 4 August 2014 352

Opus Research Report 14-529D84.00 8 4.3 Southerly Winds 4.3.1 Areas outside the site In southerly winds the development is not expected to have any major significant detrimental effect on wind conditions in any of the residential areas to the south of the site, as these areas are upwind of the proposed buildings. Further amelioration could be achieved through fences 1.8m to 2m high along the site boundary in this area, together with trees and other shrubbery. The users of the golf course and/or people potentially walking along the stopbank to the north of the development are unlikely to notice any change in the amenity of this area. This is because: the new buildings on the eastern section of the site are one and two storey blocks, which are similar in height and plan to the existing residential buildings to the south, the taller buildings on the western section of the site should actually provide some additional overall shelter for the adjacent areas of the golf course and stop bank, and the new raised stopbank also helps to offset some of the effects around the corners of the new buildings. 4.3.2 On-site areas Many of the comments and suggestions made for improving the amenity and providing additional wind shelter that were made for northerly winds also apply for southerly winds. This includes (1) landscaping the areas adjacent to the internal driveway as much as is practical, (2) keeping people away from the windward corners of the buildings, if possible, and (3) landscaping the areas between the taller buildings according to use and pedestrian routes. 4.4 Building Entrances The entrances to the taller buildings on the western section of the site deserve some design consideration. Entrances are where people transition from a calm internal space, potentially to the full effects of the weather outside. This is particularly important in this situation, where the larger proportion of people will be older, and potentially less able to deal with strong wind gusts. Where possible, entrances should be positioned on the more sheltered eastern and western sides of the buildings, and the northern and southern ends and corners avoided. Recessing of entrances can also provide a more gradual transition from internal to exterior spaces. If it is not possible to avoid placing entrances on the northern and southern sides of the buildings then the following options could be considered: sheltering the doors with external screens or landscaping, using automatic sliding doors rather than swing doors, or using two sets of separated automatic doors to create a wind lobby. These options could also be used for entrances on the eastern and western sides of the buildings to improve the usability of these spaces. 529D84.00 4 August 2014 353

Opus Research Report 14-529D84.00 9 5. Concluding Comments (1) Existing wind speeds in the immediate area around the site range from low to high, with many of the higher winds speeds being a consequence of the exposed nature of the site to northerly winds. (2) The layout of the proposed development has included some intelligent design choices with respect to wind effects. These include the positioning of lower rise elements close to the adjacent residential areas, and the massing of the taller buildings mostly away from residential areas. (3) In northerly winds the proposed development should have a net beneficial effect on wind conditions in adjacent residential properties, by providing additional shelter to these areas. (4) In southerly winds, the proposed development should have minimal impact on wind conditions in the adjacent residential properties, given it is located downstream of these areas. (5) Users of the neighbouring golf course and stop bank areas should not notice any deterioration on the overall amenity of this area. (6) The above conclusions would also generally apply to other potential site layout options consistent with the storey heights referred to and the District Plan Change prepared by Summerset. (7) Suggestions have been made about how the effects of the development on wind conditions, both internal and external to the site, could be ameliorated or improved through the refinement of elements already included in the design. These include planting (trees and shrubbery), screens and fencing, and the location and design of the building entrances. Authored by: Reviewed by: Neil Jamieson Research Leader Aerodynamics Paul Carpenter Wind Engineering Consultant 529D84.00 4 August 2014 354

Opus Research 33 The Esplanade, Petone PO Box 30 845, Lower Hutt 5040 New Zealand t: +64 4 587 0600 f: +64 4 587 0604 w: www.opus.co.nz 355

356