WHALE SHARK (Rhincodon typus) RECOVERY PLAN

Similar documents
BLUE, FIN AND SEI WHALE RECOVERY PLAN

Regional workshop on the implementation of the CITES shark and ray listings, Dakar, August 2014 Page 1

World Oceans Day Does marine legislation actually protect the marine environment?

Submission on summary of the Draft Convention on Biological Diversity National Report

Suraji Presented on CITES Non-Detriment Findings (NDFs) Workshop Jakarta, July 26, 2016

Memorandum of Understanding concerning. Conservation, Restoration and Sustainable Use of the Saiga Antelope (Saiga tatarica tatarica)

THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT ACT. (No. 47 of 2013)

Legislation. Lisa T. Ballance Marine Mammal Biology SIO 133 Spring 2013

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY BIRDS OF PREY IN AFRICA AND EURASIA

APPENDIX 2.1 Lake Sturgeon - Mitigation and Enhancement

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service International Affairs Program

Appendix Template for Submission of Scientific Information To Describe Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas

environmentaldefender s office ltd new south wales

Other Relevant International Standards OIE Global Conference on Rabies Control 7-9 September 2011, Incheon, Korea

Running head: ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS: ENDANGERED MARINE ANIMALS IN AUSTRALIA

Re: Polar Bear Total Allowable Harvest in the Labrador Inuit Settlement Area 2017

Assessment of the. Queensland East Coast Spanish Mackerel Fishery

INTERIM MEASURES ADOPTED BY PARTICIPANTS IN NEGOTIATIONS TO ESTABLISH SOUTH PACIFIC REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION

The Extended Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna,

AREAS BEYOND NATIONAL JURISDICTION: INDIAN OCEAN DEVELOPING COASTAL STATES TUNA MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Native American Crosscut Funding

CMM Conservation and Management Measure for the Management of New and Exploratory Fisheries in the SPRFMO Convention Area.

BIODIVERSITY LAW: A factsheet by the ACT EDO 2010

Briefing on the IWC s Conservation Committee

CMM on Management of New and Exploratory Fisheries in the SPRFMO Convention Area

Convention on Migratory Species of Wild Animals. Bradnee Chambers CMS Executive Secretary

CMM Conservation and Management Measure for the Management of Bottom Fishing in the SPRFMO Convention Area

SPAW SHARK PROPOSALS. for 5 shark and 3 ray species. Irene Kingma November 1 st 2016 / SPAW STAC meeting Miami Dutch Elasmobranch Society

ADVERSE ANTHROPOGENIC MARINE/OCEAN NOISE IMPACTS ON CETACEANS AND OTHER BIOTA

8 TH MEETING DOCUMENT BYC-08 INF-A

Aggregate Permit Applications: Natural Environment Report A.R Yes. Lands & Waters Aggregate & Petroleum Resources March 15, 2006

BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 2016 AND REGULATIONS UPDATE. Dr Ken Atkins Manager Species and Communities Branch

LANCU46v2 - SQA Unit Code H2PW 04 Control vertebrate pests and predators using traps

The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Melanie Virtue Head, Aquatic Species

APPENDIX N. CORALS LISTING

REQUEST FOR TENDERS. 1. Background

Cartagena Convention and the Protocol Concerning Specially Protected Areas and Wildlife (SPAW)

Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act

Regional Plan of Action (RPOA) to Promote Responsible Fishing Practices including Combating IUU Fishing in the Region 1. Contents

Progress Made by Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs)

U.N. Gen. Ass. Doc. A/CONF.164/37 (8 September 1995) < pdf?openelement>.

Table: IUCN Red List Assessment Results

Species at Risk Act (SARA) Consultation Workbook

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds

The Maritime Law Association of Australia and New Zealand

Reef fish fisheries overview Threats to reef fishes. Biology Spawning aggregations. Next steps?

Preserving Biodiversity

Endangered Seas Campaign. Marine Reserves: Protecting. the future of our. oceans

Protecting the Deep Sea Under International Law. Legal Options for Addressing High Seas Bottom Trawling

ENVIRONMENT POLICIES EVOLUTION Part 2

Policy Statement. Page 2 of 5

Review of Egypt s National Laws, Regulations, and Adequacy of Enforcement

Delegation of Australia

WHAT IS THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR RESPONSIBLE FISHERIES?

IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS OF THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION LAW. Authorized by the Republic of China Wildlife Conservation Law, amended October 29, 1994.

Conservation for a blue planet:

IOTC Agreement Article X. Report of Implementation for the year 2016

Tuna Dolphin Controversy

Proposal for cooperation between GRASP and the CMS Gorilla Agreement

Delegation of Australia

SUBMISSION GUIDE NATIVE PLANTS AND ANIMALS. May

Conservation of Polar Bear: Implementation of the Agreement. THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Summary of Preliminary Results of Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis, 2018

Chapter 9: Sustaining Biodiversity

Section 3: The Future of Biodiversity

Re: Consultation on the addition of narwhal and two bowhead whale populations to the SARA List

Policy Priorities for the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission

Official Journal of the European Union L 248/17

Byelaws: Questions and answers

ATLANTIC STURGEON. Consultations on listing under the Species at Risk Act

Report of Thailand on significant trade in specimens of appendix-ii species (Naja naja spp.)

7TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE COMMISSION

Position of WWF Mongolia Program Office on current situation of Argali hunting and conservation in Mongolia

Message from the Chairperson

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. Predator/Prey Component. Terms of Reference

A G R E E M E N T. Between. Fisheries Management Authorities. from Republic of BULGARIA, ROMANIA, SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO and UKRAINE

WCPFC HARVEST STRATEGY WORKSHOP. Stones Hotel Kuta, Bali 30 November 1 December 2015

Field Guide: Teacher Notes

ICRI Member s Report

3rd Meeting of the Special Focal Points for Illegal Killing of Birds

CONVENTION ON MIGRATORY SPECIES

Extinction. The real reason dinosaurs went extinct

Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals

Re: Request for Comments on the Proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership Trade Agreement, 74 Fed. Reg (December 16, 2009)

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

Faster, better, cheaper: Transgenic Salmon. How the Endangered Species Act applies to genetically

SIERRA LEGAL DEFENCE FUND

endangered species act A Reference Guide August 2013 United States marine corps

9-1 What Role Do Humans Play in the Premature Extinction of Species?

Photo credit: Front cover, Ronnie Posala/WorldFish. Priority actions for dugong and seagrass conservation in Solomon Islands

LANCU60Ga - SQA Unit Code D9HX 04 Contribute to the management of a fishery

Oceans Humans both depend on it and threaten it with their activities

Fisheries and Oceans Canada Fisheries Protection Program

The Great Barrier Reef

LIVE CAPTURE OF CETACEANS FROM THE WILD FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES

A. PURPOSE B. BACKGROUND

*attached below (scroll down)*

REGIONAL TRAINING ON IDENTIFICATION OF SHARKS AND RAYS Species Visual ID and Design monitoring at Landing Site

Wildlife poaching and trafficking Case of Kenya

Transcription:

WHALE SHARK (Rhincodon typus) RECOVERY PLAN 2004-2009 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority

Background The whale shark (Rhincodon typus) is the world s largest fish, and one of only 3 filter-feeding shark species. Whale sharks have a broad distribution in tropical and warm temperate seas. In Australian waters, they are known to aggregate at Ningaloo Reef and in the Coral Sea. The whale shark is a highly migratory fish and only visits Australian waters seasonally. The whale shark was listed as vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC) in 2001. The whale shark is also afforded a degree of international protection through its inclusion in Appendix II of the Convention for Migratory Species (CMS) and Appendix II of the Convention for International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Appendix II of CMS requires parties to cooperate to develop arrangements aimed at the protection and conservation of species listed on it such as the whale shark. Appendix II of CITES regulates international trade in whale Shark product so that any trade must not be detrimental to the survival of the species. Detailed background information on the biology, population status and threats to the whale shark can be found at http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity. The following sets out the Recovery Plan for the whale shark. Objective (270(2)(a)) To maintain existing levels of protection for the whale shark in Australia while working to increase the level of protection afforded to the whale shark within the Indian Ocean and Southeast Asian region to enable population growth so that the species can be removed from the threatened species list of the EPBC Act. Threats (270(2)(ca)) The main threat to the whale shark occurs outside Australian waters and is commercial harvest by a number of other range states of the whale shark. The potential future threats to whale sharks visiting Australian waters are: competition with fisheries, pollution and marine debris, climatic and ocean change, predation, disease, and direct disturbance from tourism, research or interference. At present none of these potential threats appear to have an impact on the numbers of whale sharks visiting Australian waters. This plan only addresses anthropogenic threats that can be effectively and realistically managed. Populations under Particular Pressure of Survival and Protective Measures (270(2)(e)) Commercial harvest in range states, not including Australia, is a direct threat to the survival of Whale sharks. In Australia whale sharks are protected as both a listed threatened species

and a migratory species under the EPBC Act. However, commercial harvest within other range states results in pressure being placed on the numbers of whale sharks visiting Australian waters. Actions to Achieve the Objective/s (270(2)(c)) Given the absence of current anthropogenic threats to the whale shark in Australian waters, the only actions to be identified in this plan are to: 1. Increase the level of cooperation with other range states, particularly in the Indian Ocean and Southeast Asian region to protect the whale shark, through engagement in multilateral fora such as the CMS. Ideally increased cooperation will result in range state agreement to: reduce fishing pressures on the species in the waters of other regional range states; and halt the decline of the species in regional range states. 2. Monitor numbers of the whale shark visiting Australian waters to: determine the rate of population change and population size by undertaking scientifically robust, regular and repeatable population surveys; and identify any emerging actual impacts that will have an immediate impact on the species and thus on its recovery, and to facilitate the development of appropriate responses. Management Practices (EPBC Reg. 7.11(2)(b)) Management practices and measures other than those contained in this plan have been developed and are being implemented through, inter alia, State legislation, Marine Protected Area Management Plans, the Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land Management (WA CALM) Code of Conduct for Whale Shark tourism operations. In addition, the EPBC Act provides protection for the whale shark through making it an offence to kill, injure, take, trade, keep, or move any member of a listed threatened species in a Commonwealth area without a permit. The EPBC Act also requires proponents of actions which have or are likely to have a significant impact on listed threatened species, to refer the proposed action to the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage for assessment. Internationally, any range state of the whale shark that is a party to CMS and/or CITES is required to undertake a number of activities to protect the whale shark. CMS requires range states to develop regional arrangements that may be legally or non-legally binding which will ensure the conservation of the whale shark. These arrangements generally include a number of targeted conservation initiatives such as habitat protect and protection from the identified threats impacting adversely on the species. Parties to CITES have agreed to regulate any trade in whale shark product so that such trade will not have a detrimental impact of the survival of the species.

Criteria to Measure Performance of the Plan against the Objective/s (270(2)(b)) The objective of this plan will be attained when: whale sharks visiting Australian waters are no longer under threat through actions taken outside of Australian waters such as commercial harvest, and if future major threats to numbers of whale sharks emerge, measures to minimise or mitigate them are identified and implemented as a priority. Habitats Critical to the Survival of the Species and its Protection (270(2)(d)) Important habitat for the whale shark within the Australian jurisdiction is the known seasonal aggregation sites. The whale shark seasonally aggregates in coastal waters off Ningaloo Reef between March and July each year, at Christmas Island in October and November, and in the Coral Sea between November and December. These Seasonal aggregations are thought to be linked to localised seasonal pulses of food productivity. It is not known if other habitat critical to the survival of the whale shark exists within Australian waters. Known seasonal aggregations are known to occur outside Australian jurisdiction in a number of Range States such as the Philipines, Belize and the Maldives. In Australian waters, Ningaloo Reef, Christmas Island and the area of the Coral Sea within the Coringa-Herald National Nature Reserve and the Lihou Reef National Nature Reserve are all afforded a high level of protection through their status as protected areas under the EPBC Act. Additional protection to Ningaloo Reef is afforded through its status as Marine Park under Western Australia s Conservation and Land Management Act 1984. Major Benefits to Other Native Species or Ecological Communities (270(2)(h)) As the recovery of this species will arise from co-operative activity at the international level, it is unlikely that the implementation of this recovery plan will benefit other native species or ecological communities. Research activities associated with monitoring will need to be undertaken in a manner that will ensure that disturbance to marine protected areas is minimised. Duration and Cost of the Recovery Process (270(2)(f)) This plan should be reviewed five years after the date on which it is made by the Australian Minister for the Environment and Heritage. It should remain in place until such time that the number of sharks visiting Australian waters is no longer threatened by actions taken outside of Australian waters, and that numbers of whale sharks visiting Australian waters has improved to the point that the species can be removed from the EPBC threatened species list.

The cost of the recovery process is difficult to predict, as international negotiations can be substantially affected by unrelated developments our international relationships. The domestic aspects of this plan should be covered under the core business expenditure of the affected organisations. Affected Interests (270(2)(g)(i)) Organisations likely to be affected by the actions proposed in this plan include the following: the Australian Fisheries Management Authority; Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry; Department of the Environment and Heritage, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land Management, Conservation groups, Wildlife interest groups, and Tourist operators. Organisations/Persons Involved in Evaluating the Performance of the Plan (270(g)(ii)) The National Shark Recovery Group should evaluate the performance of this plan and report the results of their review to the Minister of the Environment and Heritage, through the TSSC. Where to Get the Plan This recovery plan is obtainable from: www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity Migratory and Marine Species Section Wildlife Conservation Branch Department of the Environment and Heritage GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601