Highway Capacity and LOS. Reading Assignment: pgs

Similar documents
Highway Capacity and LOS. Reading Assignment: pgs

Basic Freeways and Multilane Highways (LOS) CIVL 4162/6162

BASIC FREEWAY CAPACITY STUDIES Definitions

Multilane Highways 54

Transportation Knowledge

2009 PE Review Course Traffic! Part 1: HCM. Shawn Leight, P.E., PTOE, PTP Crawford Bunte Brammeier Washington University

Exam 2. Two-Lane Highway Capacity and LOS Analysis. Two-lane Highway Characteristics. LOS Considerations 10/24/2009

Analysis of Weaving, Merging, and Diverging Movements CIVL 4162/6162

Highway Capacity. 1. A traffic stream is carrying 4500 veh/hr in three lanes in one direction. What is the average headway per lane?

Shawn Leight, P.E., PTOE, PTP CBB Transportation Engineers + Planners ITE International President Washington University

CAPACITY, LEVEL OF SERVICE, FUNDAMENTALS OF HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS

Highway Capacity Manual 2010

Chapter Capacity and LOS Analysis of a Signalized I/S Overview Methodology Scope Limitation

HIGHWAY CONCEPTS. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 CHAPTER 12 CONTENTS

EVALUATION OF METHODOLOGIES FOR THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FREEWAY WEAVING SECTIONS. Alexander Skabardonis 1 and Eleni Christofa 2

HCM Sixth Edition. Plus More. Rahim (Ray) Benekohal University of Illinois at Urban Champaign,

MEMORANDUM. Date: September 22, Don Skillingstad, Spokane Transit Authority. Yongliang Zhu, Lochner

Updated Roundabout Analysis Methodology

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Management of Multi-Lane Highways in Jordan (Case Study)

URBAN STREET CONCEPTS

T R A N S P O R T A T I O N M E M O R A N D U M

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

CLOSURE QUEUE ANALYSIS TOOL USER MANUAL

Capacity and Level of Service LOS

Tonight we will be discussing accidents

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Design of Turn Lane Guidelines

Improvement of pedestrian safety and traffic flow regulation at the railway junction, Kandy

Defining Purpose and Need

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

Practical Application of Turn Lane Design Criteria in Developing Suburban & Urban Corridors

3 ROADWAYS 3.1 CMS ROADWAY NETWORK 3.2 TRAVEL-TIME-BASED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Roadway Travel Time Measures

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

US 81 CORRIDOR STUDY FROM NORTH OF UNION CITY SOUTH TO SH 19 SOUTH OF CHICKASHA CANADIAN AND GRADY COUNTIES, OKLAHOMA JULY 2007

Effects of Traffic Condition (v/c) on Safety at Freeway Facility Sections

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

Topic No January 2000 Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies Revised July Chapter 8 GAP STUDY

Analysis of Signalized Intersections

Actuated Signal Timing Design CIVL 4162/6162

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Access Management Benefits & Techniques. Access Management Workshop June 2, 2006

Chapter 5 5. INTERSECTIONS 5.1. INTRODUCTION

Chapter 8 Chapter 8 VEHICLE GAP STUDY PURPOSE VEHICLE GAP STUDY (FIGURE 8-1)

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

NCHRP Project Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the HCM

How Might Connected Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles Influence Geometric Design? October 10, 2017

EXAMINING THE EFFECT OF HEAVY VEHICLES DURING CONGESTION USING PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS

Chapter 7 Intersection Design

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

INTERCHANGE RAMP TERMINALS

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

Impact of Signalized Intersection on Vehicle Queue Length At Uthm Main Entrance Mohd Zulhilmi Abdul Halim 1,b, Joewono Prasetijo 2,b

Effect of Supplemental Signal on Start-Up Lost Time at Signalized Intersection

1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS

Assessing Level of Service for Highways in a New Metropolitan City

Sensitivity Analysis of Factors Affecting Road Widening Thresholds

Parks Highway: MP Lucus Road to Big Lake Road

Methodology for analysing capacity and level of service for signalized intersections (HCM 2000)

Methodology Update for Estimating Volume to Service Flow Ratio

Safety of U-turns at Unsignalized Median Openings

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Geometric and Trafc Conditions Summary

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

Unit 7 Speed, Travel Time and Delay Studies

SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS

Springer Tracts on Transportation and Traffic

Geometric Design Tables

6.4.2 Capacity of Two-Way Intersections-HCM Method

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES. Figure Title

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS. Unit I

Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual 2 nd Edition

TRAFFIC CONDITIONS REPORT FOR INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 225 (I-225) PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGES (PEL) STUDY

Managed Lanes. Steve Schilke, P.E. Major Projects Unit Head District 1. Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 2016

Roadway Geometric Design I: Functions, Controls and Alignments

Iowa Corridor Management Pilot Project Overview. Recommendations For A Corridor Management Program August 2004

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

Alberta Highway 881. Corridor Management Plan. Session Forum 1 - Highways. Tri-Party Transportation Conference Moving Alberta Into the Future

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

Part-time Shoulder Use Guide

Signal Timing Design CIVL 4162/6162

HCM 2010: ROUNDABOUTS. PRAVEEN EDARA, PH.D., P.E., PTOE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA

Characteristics of. Entering & Exiting High Speed Considerations

Uncontrolled Intersection

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

Traffic Academy: IJS & IMS FAQ/RULES OF THUMB

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

An Analysis of the Travel Conditions on the U. S. 52 Bypass. Bypass in Lafayette, Indiana.

ANALYSIS OF SIGNALISED INTERSECTIONS ACCORDING TO THE HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE PROCESSES APPLIED IN HUNGARY

Transcription:

Highway Capacity and LOS Reading Assignment: pgs. 170-200 We know from the previous section that traffic flows fairly well when Demand < Capacity. However, when demand approaches capacity, we begin to experience lower speeds, congestion. hus in planning and design of highways we are interested in designing facilities that will operate below capacity. We need a good estimate of capacity for this. Capacity analysis involves the quantitative evaluation of the capability of a freeway section to carry traffic. We will be concerned in this section with determining the level of service particular freeways provide, and in designing a freeway to operate at an acceptable LOS. Factors Contributing to LOS: raffic volume is the principal factor affecting LOS, however, several other factors contribute. 1. Lane width When narrower that 12 ft, traffic flow is restricted. 2. Lateral obstructions When objects are located near the edge of the roadway or in the median, this has the effect of reducing lateral spacing because drivers tend to move away from the object. Effect is eliminated if object is < 6 inches tall and 6 feet from the roadway edge. Lateral clearances are based on safety considerations, not volume. 3. raffic composition Presence of trucks, buses, rv s, in a traffic stream (anything other than passenger cars) reduces flow due to size, operating characteristics, and interactions with other vehicles. CIVL 3161 ransportation Systems Engineering 1

4. Grade Effect of grade depends on both length and slope of grade. raffic is significantly affected when grades are 3% and ¼ mile or longer, or grades <3% are ½ mi or longer. 5. Speed Space mean speed is considered in LOS analysis because flow has a significant effect on speed. Six LOS have been established A-F (A is best). HCM establishes procedures for determining LOS. We are going to analyze simplified cases of basic freeway segments and only basic types of terrain and trucks, even though procedures and info for analysis of much more complex situations are outlined in HCM. Basic Freeway Segments: Zone of influence for ramp junctions: - On-ramps: 500 ft upstream and 2500 ft downstream - Off-ramps: 2500 ft upstream, and 500 ft downstream Level of service A Speed of vehicle is controlled only by desires of the driver and the prevailing conditions. LOS B raffic still under free-flow conditions, may experience some restrictions in lane changes. LOS C- Speeds are still near free-flow, however, flow is heavier, and any increase in volume immediately results in decrease of service. CIVL 3161 ransportation Systems Engineering 2

LOS D Flow is approaching an unstable level. Minor incidents may result in queuing. LOS E Flow is unstable (at or near capacity). Lane changes will disturb traffic stream. Minor incidents cause extensive queuing. LOS F Operation is under forced or breakdown conditions. Ideal conditions for maximum service flow rate: - Minimum interchange spacing 2 miles - Only passenger cars - Lane widths 12 feet - Lateral obstructions 6 ft from roadway edge - Level terrain (grades < 2%) - Drivers typical of weekday (regular) traffic - 10 or more lanes in urban areas For LOS analysis, we want to convert prevailing conditions to equivalent base conditions. For base conditions, a free-flow speed of 70 mph or greater is required. Basic Equation: FFS BFFS f LW f LC f N - f ID Where: FFS estimated free flow speed in mph. BFFS estimated base free flow speed in mph (75 mph for rural freeways, 70 mph for urban based on HCM recommendations). f LW adjustment for lane width (if less than 12 ft), mph. CIVL 3161 ransportation Systems Engineering 3

Flow Rate: f LC adjustment for right side lateral clearance ( if less than 6 ft), mph. f N adjustment for # of lanes (if less than 5 in one direction), mph. f ID adjustment for interchange density if < 2 mi, mph. V v p PHF N f HV f p Where: v p 15-minute passenger-car equivalent flow rate (pc/h/ln) V hourly volume in the given direction of flow (vph) PHF peak-hour factor N number of lanes in the given direction of flow f HV an adjustment factor for th presence of heavy vehicles f p an adjustment factor to account for the fact that all drivers of the facility may not be commuters or regular users. *Basis for analysis is peak 15 min flow rate. PHF Peak Hour Volume Peak Hour volume Peak 15 min. flow rate 4 Peak 15 min. Volume Example: ime (min.) Count (veh) 0-15 340 15-30 375 30-45 335 45-60 300 Heavy Vehicle Effects: (trucks, buses, rv s) hese do not perform as well as passenger cars, so they are thought of in passenger car equivalents on a freeway. his equivalent value depends on the type of terrain: level, rolling, mountainous. f HV 1+ P ( E 1 1) + P R ( E R 1) 1+ P 1 ( E 1) CIVL 3161 ransportation Systems Engineering 4

P, P R proportion of trucks and buses, and RV s E, E B, E R PCEs for trucks and buses, and RV s (*Note- We will typically assume that there are no RV s in our traffic stream, thus P R 0, yielding the above version of the correction factor equation.) Analysis is based on general extended freeway segment Level heavy vehicles maintain same speed as pc s. Rolling HVs travel at speeds lower than pc. Mountainous HVs operate at crawl speed for significant distances. When conditions are very severe, we will instead base on grade and length of grade. Restrictions for use: No grade < 3% for longer than ½ mile. No grade 3% for longer than ¼ mile. Determining LOS: Graphical use Figure 6.2 with your calculated v p, and your free flow speed. Determine where these values intersect, to see if you fall in the linear or curved portion of the speed curves, so that you can estimate the average speed. (*Note- the average speed will be the same as your free-flow speed if you fall on the linear portion of the graph.). hen calculate density as K v p / S, where S is the average speed. Once you have determined density, determine LOS as follows: LOS Density Range (pc/mi/ln) A 0-11 B >11-18 C >18-26 D >26-35 E >35-45 F >45 able procedure You can use table 6.1 to determine LOS once you have determined density. his table also provides you with values of the MSF (Maximum Service Flowrate). MSF i is the maximum v p that can be maintained while remaining at level of service i. (Use MSF E for total capacity of the freeway). Determining Capacity: Capacity MSF E x PHF x N x f HV x f p *this is total capacity. Other capacity can be determined to remain in a specific level of service using MSF i. CIVL 3161 ransportation Systems Engineering 5

Determining Lane Requirements: Based on design level of service. Iterative procedure. - Use LOS B for rural freeways - Use LOS C for urban freeways (may be forced to D due to land restrictions). N DDHV MSF PHF f i HV f p When you calculate design N, you need to round up, otherwise you will drop to a lower LOS. Example: Given- Older 4-lane freeway 11 ft lanes Directional peak hour volume 2100 vph PHF 0.95 6% trucks Interchange density 1.0/mi Generally rolling terrain Obstructions 2 ft form edge of traveled way at both roadside and median. Finda. LOS b. Average speed for prevailing conditions. c. he amount of additional traffic that the facility can accommodate in the peak hour before reaching capacity. CIVL 3161 ransportation Systems Engineering 6

Example: Given- Urban area Level terrain Interchange density 1.0/mi. DDHV 4,500 vph PHF 0.90 12% trucks Primarily commuter traffic and other regular users Find the required number of lanes to provide the design LOS. CIVL 3161 ransportation Systems Engineering 7