TOWARD A COMMON MONITORING SCHEME OF HUNTING BAG IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Similar documents
A new vision for the Birds Directive & The Positive Role of Hunting

3rd Meeting of the Special Focal Points for Illegal Killing of Birds

MANAGING GEESE WITH RECREATIONAL HUNTING

13 September 2013 Brussels, Belgium

HUNTING WITH HOUNDS THE CASE FOR EUROPEAN UNION LEGISLATION

WORKSHOP ON SAFE AND HEALTHY WALKING AND CYCLING IN URBAN AREAS 30 September 1 October 2010 Batumi, Georgia

Original language: English CoP17 Doc CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

Explanatory Memorandum to The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds

EU roadmap towards eliminating illegal killing, trapping and trade of wildbirds & update on the EU Action Plan on Wildlife trafficking

SUSTAINABLE HUNTING - Building Capacity for Sustainable Hunting of Migratory Birds in Mediterranean Third Countries LIFE04 TCY/INT/000054

Game Guard Body of Hunting Organizations in Greece: A conservation success story

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY BIRDS OF PREY IN AFRICA AND EURASIA

3 rd MEETING OF THE AEWA EUROPEAN GOOSE MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL WORKING GROUP

Success and failure of a stakeholder based approach mitigating human-wild boar conflicts in rural areas in Bavaria (South East Germany)

Recent trends in the number of hunters and the harvest of wildfowl in the Camargue, France: preliminary results

154074/EU XXV. GP. Eingelangt am 14/09/17 PE-CONS 25/1/17 REV 1 EUROPEAN UNION. Strasbourg, 13 September 2017 (OR. en) PE-CONS 25/1/17 REV 1

Sustainable use of wildlife in the context of the GIZ Regional Programme in Central Asia

Effects of restocking for hunting purpose: the Mallard case

INTERNATIONAL DECADE OF OCEAN SCIENCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ( ) OUTLINE

FINLAND OPENS DEER, WILD BOAR AND MOUFLON HUNTING FOR BOWHUNTERS

Position of WWF Mongolia Program Office on current situation of Argali hunting and conservation in Mongolia

Posting of workers in the European Union and EFTA countries : Report on A1 portable documents issued in 2010 and 2011

Proposal for cooperation between GRASP and the CMS Gorilla Agreement

Do hunting bag changes match the population trends of Turtle Dove? The case of Spain.

Council CNL(17)33. Annual Progress Report on Actions Taken Under the Implementation Plan for the Calendar Year EU - Denmark

Community Development and Recreation Committee. General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. P:\2015\Cluster A\PFR\CD AFS#22685

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION. establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European Eel.

HUNTING AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN GREECE

Consultation Document

Official Journal of the European Union L 248/17

AEPF Governance and Structure

Review of Egypt s National Laws, Regulations, and Adequacy of Enforcement

Hunting in protected areas CEM Sustainable Use & Management of Ecosystems (SUME) SSC/CEESP Sustainable Use and Livelihoods (SULi)

LUTREOLA - Recovery of Mustela lutreola in Estonia : captive and island populations LIFE00 NAT/EE/007081

Project on the evaluation of the human dimensions of the target audiences regarding Eastern wolves conservation in La Mauricie National Park of

LIFE and Land Stewardship Lessons Learned. 13th of October 2016 Marc Vilahur, president of XCT

Section 2 Strategic Alignment. Contents

Salmon Five Point Approach restoring salmon in England

European Athletics Health and Well-Being Conference January 2014, Marseille (FRA)

COMMISSIO STAFF WORKI G PAPER. Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment. Accompanying the document

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

Public Consultation Document

Wildlife and Commercially-Bred Formerly Wild Animals

Memorandum of Understanding concerning. Conservation, Restoration and Sustainable Use of the Saiga Antelope (Saiga tatarica tatarica)

Introduction. You may find detailed information about the network from the EuroVelo website: Page 1/5

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Section 1 Preparation

Forty-first Session of the Executive Council UNESCO, Paris, 24 June 1 July 2008

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE TRAINING COURSE ON THE SURVEILLANCE OF WILDLIFE DISEASES AND THE ROLE OF HUNTERS

GUIDELINES ON ACCESS AND CONSERVATION ON CRAGS AND CLIFFS

Opening remarks for the International Forum for Sports Integrity. 15 February Check against delivery-

Certification Determination. Louisiana Blue Crab Commercial Fishery

Report of the third meeting of THE PEP Partnership on Cycling Promotion

Policy Position Statement on Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) and hybrids in Ireland and Northern Ireland

People and Policies: the 7:30 a.m. Debates 31 OCTOBER 2008

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

PRESENTATION TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA LEGISALTIVE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE September 26, 2013

ATTITUDES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF AUSTRALIAN RECREATIONAL HUNTERS

Screening report Serbia

Young Researchers Seminar 2009

Loughs Agency Gníomhaireacht na Lochanna Factrie fur Loughs

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

ROAD SAFETY IN COUNTRIES WITH LESS DEVELOPED INFRASTRUCTURES: Policies to maximize effect with minimum resources

SCHEDULE A NORTHLAND FISH AND GAME COUNCIL JOB DESCRIPTION

Keywords: 7SI/Brown bear/harvest/harvest quota/hunting/malme/management/ mortality/population size/trend/ursus arctos

Capacity of transport infrastructure networks

Hunting, Fishing, Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife Conservation Opportunities and Coordination with States, Tribes, and Territories

Report of Thailand on significant trade in specimens of appendix-ii species (Naja naja spp.)

County Donegal Public Participation Network Work Plan

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION. fixing for 2018 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks in the Black Sea

Documentation of statistics for Road Traffic Accidents 2014

FISHERY BY-PRODUCT REPORT

INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF MUSEUMS (ICOM) INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR EXHIBITION EXCHANGE (ICEE)

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

European fishing fleet capacity management

Byelaws: Questions and answers

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Task Force on migratory fish species Gothenburg, Sweden, 9 May 2016

Fish, Fisheries. Life+ Information & Communication and European Policy in the Prespa Basin. Layman s report

Council CNL(16)31. Annual Progress Report on Actions Taken Under the Implementation Plan for the Calendar Year EU - Finland

Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions (Baltic Sea)

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR MANAGEMENT IN NEIGHBORING STATES

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Draft Freshwater Fisheries Management Plan on behalf of Victoria s recreational fishing sector.

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2017/2120(INI)

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47

Council CNL(14)21. Annual Progress Report on Actions Taken Under Implementation Plans for the Calendar Year EU Denmark

Revised as of 25 January 2018 Draft Roadmap to the Fourth Session of the UN Environment Assembly. Assembly

Outline of the Position Duties and Responsibilities

Highway Safety Workforce Development Committee

The North American Waterfowl Management Plan: Incorporating the New Goal

The use of dolphins in captivity in the EU and developments towards sea refuges for stranded and captive dolphins.

CEDR N5 Improvements in the field of Road Safety New trends in member states Road Safety strategies

Nordatlantisk Fiskeriministerkonference i Shediac 29. august 2017

THE PLANNING AND. Transport and the law Integrated transport planning Strategies Responsibilities of local government and road controlling authorities

1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;

Transcription:

Doc: AEWA/ TC6 Inf. 6.11 Agenda item 27 04 April 2005 Original: English TOWARD A COMMON MONITORING SCHEME OF HUNTING BAG IN THE EUROPEAN UNION Sustainable Hunting Initiative Technical Workshop, Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, 16 17 March 2005 Final discussion paper and agenda (11 March 2005) Background The Birds Directive (Council Directive 79/409/EEC) provides the common framework for the conservation of naturally occurring species of wild birds throughout the European Union. The Birds Directive fully recognises the legitimacy of hunting of wild birds and list the species for which hunting (Annex II) owing to their population level, geographical distribution level and reproduction rate throughout the Community can take place under national legislation. A guidance document on hunting was recently published by the Commission that provides clarification of the requirements of the Directive relating to hunting. Another report was also published that defines the reproduction and pre-nuptial periods for huntable species throughout the EU. At present no European-wide monitoring scheme exists to gather information on numbers of huntable birds shot annually. Since bag statistics is of immense importance when managing species efforts should be made to collect this information. An urgent need for reliable hunting bag data from all Member States has been expressed by many organisations, including The Federation of Associations for Hunting and Conservation of the EU (FACE). Most recently, the need for collection of reliable hunting bag data was stresses in the final note from The Conference celebrating the 25 years of the Birds Directive in Bergen op Zoom in the Netherlands. This workshop aims at bringing together representatives from all major stakeholders to discuss the premises for a common system for collecting hunting bag data in the EU. The number of participants will be limited to app. 20 persons, in an attempt to make it as productive as possible. Experts in charge of hunting bags collection from EU 25 Member States (northern and southern MS), representatives from key NGOs and other experts who can provide relevant information on methods or experiences in the field of hunting and statistics are invited at this workshop. The number of presentations will also be limited, in order to give the audience enough time for discussion. If successful, the outcome of the workshop will initially be presented for the Ornis Committee for further discussions. Subsequently it will also be presented at the Hanover conference of International Union of Game Biologists (IUGB), during the session Sustainable use, population assessment and biomonitoring.

-2- Final programme Scene setting Why collect bag statistics and current state of progress of bag collection in the European Union. Marc LUTZ and Flemming Pagh JENSEN, EC consultants As an introduction the first presentation will briefly address the following key questions: Why is it important to collect information on the number of birds hunted? What kind of data should be collected? What should this information be used for? A second presentation based on the report issued from the questionnaire sent to MS 25 by the consultants will provide an overview of the situation concerning the collection of hunting bags in EU 25. Almost all MS collect bags statistics, some of them in an exhaustive way for all huntable species, some other only for certain species that are popular quarry species or species with important conservation concerns. However there is a lot of material collected, but data seem to be rather heterogeneous. Moreover, there is no coordination between all institutes, and information provided is not shared between MS, neither in a pan-european geographic system, nor at the same time frame. The assessment of national bag statistics in the EU clearly shows that there is a difference in the collect of bags statistics between some MS where there is a long tradition for collection (with very often binding legislation), and some others where bags collection is sparser. This discussion aims at identifying the root causes of the lack of bags collections in Member States. The presentation and the subsequent debate will try to answer to the following questions: Is there an intrinsic cultural reluctance from hunters to provide their bags? Or a response to the application of the Birds Directive? Is it a problem of method in the collection and can a common and simplified carnet de chasse be a useful tool? From the result outlined during the presentation and the following discussion, actions to be undertaken in terms of communication will rise, especially targeted at the hunters and at national authorities in charge of bag statistics issues. In this general configuration, the main issue of this workshop could be stated as following: Can we implement an EU system for the collection of bags statistics, which can provide bags trends on an annual basis, for all huntable species listed under Annex II of the Birds Directive?

-3- Session 1 From hunters to statisticians: What kind of bags data is collected? What type of data should be collected? This session is based on experiences from MS, with a focus on the different collection schemes that are actually used in MS. The session will outline forces and weaknesses of different schemes. Presentation: Jarl KRAUSING (Danish Ministry of Environment) Reinhard LENTNER (Austria) Michel VALLANCE (France) Nicolaos KASSINIS (Cyprus) Theofanis KARAMPATZAKIS, Christos THOMAIDES or Alexandros GIAPIS (Greece) Dziugas ANUSKEVICIUS (Lithuania) Mathieu Boos (CNRS, France) How do we fully quantify the extent of the current hunting bag in the EU points of view from the NGOs. Following the presentations from a number of governmental authorities and hunters associations on collection of bag data, this session will give the invited NGOs a possibility to express their views on how we quantify bag data within the EU. Other possible contributions of hunters to bird monitoring and research Besides the collection of bag data, birds, which are collected through hunting, can provide a lot of information for scientific research. In that sense, the protocol elaborated within the frame of the Teal project (ONCFS) involves hunters a lot in the research project, and provides interesting feed-back to them. Other information collected (biometry, wings, gizzard ) could then be an added value in the launching of a European program on bags statistics. Presentation: Jean-Yves MONDAIN MONVAL and Mathieu GUILLEMAIN, (France)

-4- Session 2 Developing an European project for bags statistics This second session will be based on the lessons-learnt from the previous session and will aim at setting a very first draft of a common scheme for Europe (hunters regional hunting authorities national research institutes EC), including the type of information needed, the minimal sample, etc.. The consultants will initially attempt to summarise the conclusions from session 1. As a very interesting and diversified panel of experts will be present at the workshop, this session will be organized in 4 working groups. Each of them will have general guidelines and questions about the possible development of a common bags collection system for EU 25, and will propose a scenario. Results of the different groups will then be discussed. Working Groups are the following: Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Yves Lecocq Reinhard Lentner Ian Burfield Mathieu Guillemain Alexandre Cjaïkovsky Anne Teller John Harradine Dziugas Anuskevicius Konstantin Kreiser Guy-Noël Olivier Mathieu Boos Marc Lutz Manuel de Tillesse Jarl Krausing Jean-Yves Mondain Monval GREECE 1 GREECE 2 Walburga Lutz Jim Casaer Nicolas Kassinis Clairie Papazoglou Michel Vallance FP Jensen Gilles Deplanque The subsequent debate should than look into how to promote national data collection in the Member States and the how the data could also be analysed at a EU level. Among the issues to be discussed in that context is which instructions could store and analyse the bag data at a EU level. Would a way forward be to initially launch a pilot project that focus on a limited number of huntable species in a sample of Member States?

-5- Consolidated List of participants Anne TELLER, (European Commission/DG Environment) Yves LECOCQ, (FACE) Manuel de TILLESSE, (FACE) John HARRADINE, (BASC, UK) Jim CASAER (IUCN/WISPER) Nicolas KASSINIS (The Game Fund, Interior Ministry, Cyprus) Christos THOMAIDES or Dr. Alexandros GIAPIS (Hellenic Hunters Confederation) Theofanis KARAMPATZAKIS (Hellenic Hunters Confederation) Gilles DEPLANQUE, (Wetlands International Harvest Specialist Group) Alexandre CJAÏKOVSKY, Migratory Birds of the Western Palaearctic (O.M.P.O.) Guy Noël OLIVIER, (on behalf of the AEWA Secretariat) Clairie PAPAZOGLOU (Birdlife International ECO) Ian BURFIELD (Birdlife International ECO) Konstantin KREISER (Birdlife International ECO) Matthieu BOOS (CNRS) Dziugas ANUSKEVICIUS (Protected Areas Strategy Division, Nature Protection Department, Lithuania) Jean-Yves MONDAIN-MONVAL (ONCFS) Matthieu GUILLEMAIN (ONCFS) Jarl KRAUSING (Danish Ministry of Environment the central hunting administration) Reinhard LENTNER (Wetlands International Harvest Specialists Group/Nature protection administration Tyrol, Austria) Michel VALLANCE (ONCFS, France) Marc LUTZ (EC Consultant, Tour du Valat, France) Flemming Pagh JENSEN (EC Consultant, DDH Consult A/S, Denmark) Marie Antoinette DIAZ (Tour du Valat, logistics and secretariat)

-6-11 March 2005 Final program Wednesday, March 16 th Afternoon: Arrival of participants Express Train (TGV) from Paris/Brussels/London is possible (about 3 hours from Paris to Arles, + 1.30 from Brussels to Paris). Airplane connections possible to Marseille, Nîmes or Montpellier airport (Timetable in separate file). 14:30 Welcome by M. Jean Jalbert, DG of Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat. 14:45 15:30 Scene setting Introduction ML & FPJ Why is it important to collect information on hunting bag? FPJ The state of progress of bags collection in the European Union ML Discussion: Identify the root causes of the lack of bags statistics? 15:30 16:30 Session 1: What kind of bags data is collected? What type of data should be collected? Examples and lessons-learnt from the European Union 16:30 17:00 Coffee break 60 years with a national bag statistics system: Jarl Krausing, Denmark. Are bag statistics helpful to get information about population trends of huntable species? Reinhard Lentner, province Tyrol, Austria. Collecting bags statistics in Cyprus, Nicolaos KASSINIS Development of a national scheme for Bags collection in France, Michel Vallance The Artemis Program in Greece. Speaker from Hellenic Hunters Confederation Bags statistics in Lithuania, Dziugas Anuskevicius 17:00 18:30 Session 1 (continued): How do we fully quantify the extent of the current hunting bag in the EU points of view. The Federation of Associations for Hunting and Conservation of the EU (FACE) BirdLife International Representative for central administration in Member State Migratory Birds of the Western Palaearctic (O.M.P.O.) The AEWA Secretariat

-7- Thursday, March 17 th 08:30 09:00 Findings of session 1 (FP Jensen & M. Lutz) 09:00 10:00 Other possible contributions of hunters to bird monitoring and research Presentation by M. Guillemain and JY Mondain Monval (ONCFS, France) Discussion 10:00 10:30 Coffee break 10:30 12:15 Session 2: developing a European project for bag statistics Session in 4 working groups 12:15 13:30 Lunch break (canteen Tour du Valat) 13:30 15:00 Analysis of the results 15:00 16:00 Debate on how to promote national data collection and the develop of a common system 16:00 16:30 Coffee break How to encourage all Member States to develop national system? A common European system: who should care for it and where should it be based? What should be the first steps to take?. 16:30 17:30 Conclusions of the workshop Friday, March 18 th 08:00 12:00 Excursion in Tour du Valat or other sites in the Camargue Possibility to have lunch at Tour du Valat canteen (see Ms Diaz) For any details regarding logistics, please contact Ms. Marie-Antoinette DIAZ (Tour du Valat) tel: 00.33.4.90.97.20.13. fax: 00.33.4.90.97.20.19. e-mail: diaz@tourduvalat.org

-8- Presentations summaries Are bag statistics helpful to get information about population trends of huntable species? Reinhard Lentner, nature conservation administration province Tyrol, Austria As an introduction a short overview about nature conservation and hunting provisions in Austria should be given. As a concrete example those Tyrolian provisions will be explained, which are connected to hunting policies and to the EU s policies concerning the Birds Directive and especially to the bag statistics. In Austria there exist in slightly different forms bag statistics for all huntable species. Concerning the suitability of those surveys as a basis for answers about population trends there were interviewed several Austrian experts. Some species will serve as examples in the discussion about bag statistics and population trends. In the group of the geese for instance a high correspondence between independent bird counts and bag statistics can be seen. By looking at sedentary species like Capercaillie and Black Grouse, again conclusions from bag statistics to the density of populations can be drawn. Regional differences influence the reliability of bag statistics; they might depend on the varying importance of the single species for hunters. While outside the Alps hunting on migratory birds like geese is important, in mountainous regions hunting on the Capercaillie and Black Grouse stands in the centre of interest. With some restrictions bag statistics can be an essential supplementation to population density in order to gain long termpopulation trends and favourable conservation status. Collecting bags statistics in Cyprus Nicolas KASSINIS, Senior Game and Wildlife Officer The Game Fund, Interior Ministry Hunting is a very popular sport among Cypriot men. Twenty five percent of men over 18 (the legal age to own a shotgun in Cyprus) is a registered hunter. Hunters almost doubled during the last 30 years. This combined with the loss of 36% of the land due to the Turkish invasion and occupation increased the pressure even more on game species. The hare Lepus europeus is the most highly valued game species pursued by the almost 50 thousand Cypriot hunters. Along with the chukar partridge Alectoris chukar and the black francolin Francolinus francolinus the hare defines the local hunting tradition. Other important species are the resident woodpigeon Columba palumbus, the passage migrant and (to a lesser extent) migrant breeder, turtle dove Streptopelia turtur, the winter visitors skylark Alauda arvensis and thrush species (mainly Turdus philomelos, T. merula). Hunter harvest records have been recorded by the Game Fund since 1986. It was recognized that national bag records can be useful in monitoring game population trends. At the beginning this was done via field check stations while later it evolved to hunter questionnaires at the end of the season where Game Wardens visited urban and rural hunters and asked questions relevant to the year s harvest. Since 1998 this changed to a randomly selected telephone survey covering > 1% of registered hunters from all districts (450-500 hunters / year). A more sophisticated questionnaire was produced asking questions ranging from hours / field day, harvest on opening day vs. total harvest, other game species bagged, satisfaction ratings, hunting dog ownership, etc. Nowadays, the Game Fund conducts regular field check stations during hunting days, telephone surveys at the end of each season and a written questionnaire on the back of the hunting permit that each hunter must complete before the issuance of a new license each year. The Game Fund combines harvest records with annual population counts for resident game species to monitor population levels and safeguard the species sustainable harvest. Migratory species and especially thrushes that are the most popular among hunters are monitored via harvest records only since their annual abundance on the island varies due to mainly exogenous reasons. Hunting bag statistics in France: from nationwide surveys to local ones with special reference to the Camargue case. Jean-Yves Mondain Monval and Mathieu Guillemain (ONCFS) The Camargue (Rhône river delta) is at national level an area of outstanding importance both for wintering/migrating waterbirds as well as for shooting, and especially wildfowling. A part of the Camargue land (about 2/3) belongs to a Natural Regional Park (NRP) and about 70% of the area is privately owned. Hunting is an important economic activity in the delta, and

-9- implies an active management of wetlands. In the NRP's 1998 Charter, the development of a monitoring procedure of hunting activities is set out as an objective. ONCFS has therefore recently launched a specific monitoring programme on voluntary basis and the main results and problems will be briefly discussed. 60 years with a national bag statistics system (Denmark) Jarl Krausing, Desk Officer, Department for Outdoor Creativity and Wildlife Management The Danish system for collection of bag statistics dates back to 1941. During this period the system has undergone several administrative revisions in light of changes in the Act of hunting and wildlife management and in accommodating opportunities revealed by modern technology. As of today approximately 60% of the 160.000 active hunters are reporting correctly and timely, down from more than 80% just a few years ago. This decrease is very much explained by the mentioned changes in the legal and administrative frameworks, and the Danish hunting authorities are faced with a need to restore levels of reporting by hunters. A work in this regard is currently under way in collaboration with relevant actors, among others the Danish Hunters Association and the National Environmental Research Institute (NERI). The close collaboration with the Danish hunters (and conservation groups) has been crucial in not only developing and maintaining the current reporting system, but also in forming the current Hunting and Wildlife Management Act. Throughout the years, the Danish Forest and Nature Agency and the Danish Hunters Association have jointly underlined the rationale for the collection of bag statistics: The management of Danish Wildlife is an obligation shared by authorities and hunters, and it is the responsibility of all relevant stakeholders to ensure a sustainable harvest of the species hunted. The collection of bag statistics constitutes in this regard a key-mechanism in assessing population sizes of species hunted. As such the bag collection constitutes a very important dialogue between the individual hunter and hunting authorities as well as with the NERI. Reporting is not just to be seen or sold - as a technical duty by the hunter. Development of a National Survey of hunting bags in France By Michel Vallance, Scientific Director, Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage Hunting bags collection in Greece: The ARTEMIS program By Christos THOMAIDES or (delegate) Dr. Alexandros GIAPIS and Theofanis KARAMPATZAKIS Hellenic Hunters Confederation The Hellenic Hunters Confederation is collecting hunting bag statistics data, through a monitoring program called ARTEMIS for more than ten years now. This program has been evaluated very positively by many international organizations and has been presented in a number of hunting and biological conferences arising very complimentary comments. Collecting hunting bags in Lithuania Dziugas Anuskevicius Chief Desk Officer of Protected Areas Strategy Division

-10- Nature Protection Department