Safe Routes to School: Neighborhood Assessment Guide

Similar documents
Bringing together community and health. Physical Activity and Nutrition Unit Office of Statewide Health Improvement Initiatives

Safe Routes to School PLAN

Hermantown Safe Routes to School Kickoff Meeting November 10, 2015

Summary Report School Walking & Bicycling Audits. Mesa County Regional Transportation Planning Office

S A F E R O U T E S T O S C H O O L H E R M A N TOW N S C H O O L S A N D P R O C TO R S C H O O L S P L A N A P P R OVA L S

Lawrence Safe Routes to School. Community Meeting January 14, 2015

CITY OF OAK CREEK SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL ACTION PLAN. East Middle School

The Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia

Montana Safe Routes to School. Encouraging Active Lifestyles

Creating Safe Routes to School Programs for Tribal Communities

Wellington Exempted Village School District SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL TRAVEL PLAN January 2014

Safe Routes to School Guide

SECTION 1 - CONTACT INFORMATION

Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Calming Strategic Implementation Plan. January 18, 2011

Introduction.

Barnum- Safe Routes to School Meeting #2 January 20, 2015

AGENDA. 5. Next Steps a. Survey Distribution b. Draft Action Plan/Recommendations c. Review at next meeting in advance of document preparation

TWO HARBORS WALKABLE COMMUNITY REPORT

Safe Routes to School Comprehensive Plan

Safe Routes to School in New Jersey

Can A School s Location Make A Kid Fat? Arizona Department of Transportation

Getting Your SRTS Project Funded. Ryan Snyder

School Bicycling and Walking Policies: Addressing Policies that Hinder and Implementing Policies that Help

Can A School s Location Make A Kid Fat? Arizona Safe Routes To School Program

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan: Chapters 3 and 4 Distribution

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

Safe Routes to School: A Step in the Right Direction

Prioritizing Schools for Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Projects

School Travel Survey for Principals. 1. How do most of your students get to school in the morning? (Please select only one box)

WALKSacrame nto. Welcomes you to the 2009 Sacramento County Safe Routes to School Conference

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SR2S)

National Safe Routes to School Program: Initial Results

School Travel Survey for District Superintendents/Board Chairs

8/31/2016 VIA . RE: Freeport Arco Fuel Station (P16-039)

I HAVE A SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN, NOW WHAT? IMPLEMENTATION.

A Guide to Developing Safe Routes to School Maps. Gabe Lewis Transportation Planner CCRPC/CUUATS 21 September 2012

Rim Rock Elementary School Walking and Biking Audit

Safe Routes to School Travel Plan 2011 Reading-Fleming Intermediate School (RFIS)

KCPS Safe Routes to School Overview Kansas City, Missouri

DRAFT. Table of Contents. Background

Vallecito Elementary School. Travel Plan

Safe Routes to School

Safe Routes to School as a Transportation Control Measure: Impacts on the Emission Inventory

Safe Routes to School NELLIE STONE JOHNSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL

Society for Behavioral Medicine, New Orleans, LA. April 12, 2012

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

SRTS Programs That Increase Walking and Bicycling to School

Developing an Effective Safe Routes to School Funding Program for Hawai i

Improvements Infrastructure Gap Assessment and Improvements Street Striping

CITY OF KASSON TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES KASSON SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

Vision Public Workshop: Findings

Non-motorized Transportation Planning Resource Book Mayor s Task Force on Walking and Bicycling City of Lansing, Michigan Spring 2007 pg.

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Trades Center

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL GRANT GUIDELINES & APPLICATION

Health and the Built Environment Presentation to the Childhood Obesity Conference

design jam People on Wheels September 19, 2018

7 Complete Streets & Roadway Aesthetics

Appendix C 3. Bicycle / Pedestrian Planning

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Oakridge Elementary School

Windom Area Schools District #177 Safe Routes to School Plan Winfair Elementary & the Middle School January 2014

The Impact of Policy and Environmental Outcomes on Youth Physical Activity

Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Pre Bid Meeting Portsmouth, NH August 15, 2013

Safe Routes to School

Safe Routes to School: Creating an Action Plan Template

Advisory Committee on Non-Motorized Transportation

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Arlington Traditional School

3 Silverton High School Report

Background and Goals of SRTS

GRAHAM PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Safe Routes to School Comprehensive Plan

How Policy Drives Mode Choice in Children s Transportation to School

Walk Friendly Communities Education and Encouragement Programs

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

10/30/2012 VIA

Safe Kids Pedestrian Safety Programs

4/14/2017 VIA . Miriam Lim, Junior Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Safe Routes to School

Walkabout Summary Report

Molalla HEAL MAPPS Community Report

Film Guide for Educators. Designing for Safety

Putting It Into Action

Introduction to Safe Routes to School

9/22/2014 VIA . RE: Butano Apartments Pre App (PAMP )

6/14/2013 VIA . Evan Compton, Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Sacramento 300 Richards Blvd Sacramento, CA 95814

Aitkin School Routing Plan July 2010

Creating Healthy Communities

8/1/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

ASSESSING THE WALKING & BIKING ENVIRONMENT

Organizing Successful Bike Trains

July 5, Arthur R. Ware, Jr. Elementary School 2017 Safe Routes to School Walkabout Report

5/12/2016. Who We Are. Today s Objectives. Today s Presenters

Middle School Walk Audit Booklet

Healthy Weight FALL org/nutrition and click on Healthy Lifestyles, then Smart Snacks.

TULARE COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS

11/28/2016 VIA

General Design Factors

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Chicago Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiative

Transcription:

Safe Routes to School: Neighborhood Assessment Guide September 2012

Safe Routes to School Program Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Blvd., Mail Stop 430 St. Paul, MN 55155 Phone: 651-366-4195 Fax: 651-366-4192 saferoutes.dot@state.mn.us Sept. 1, 2012 Special Thanks to: Safe Routes to School Steering Committee Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Education Blue Cross Blue Shield Minnesota Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota MnDOT State Aid Office MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Arizona Department of Transportation And numerous volunteers whose effort and insight made this document possible. (Cover photo courtesy Dan Burden, 2006)

SAFE ROUTES to SCHOOL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT GUIDE: Helping you complete MnDOT s online SRTS Assessment Tool

HOW to USE THIS GUIDE This guide will help you complete MnDOT s online Safe Routes to School Neighborhood Assessment. It will save time and help organize information on current conditions in your school neighborhood. When you re finished with this guide, it should take about 10-15 minutes to enter your information into the online Safe Routes to School Neighborhood Assessment. Before attempting to use this guide (or begin the online assessment), we highly recommend assembling a Safe Routes to School team. Assembling a team of people who are passionate about bicycling and walking in your community is a great way to ensure you have the experience, energy and commitment at hand to create great safe routes and it will make completing the assessment tool that much easier. BACKGROUND on SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL in MINNESOTA SRTS programs encourage active and healthy lifelong habits, by providing youth more opportunities to walk and bicycle to school. They also reduce traffic, fuel consumption and air pollution in the vicinity of schools. Communities that choose to create Safe Routes to School will become involved in the planning and development of projects and activities that improve quality of life for people of all ages. USING this GUIDE EFFECTIVELY The full SRTS Neighborhood Assessment as it appears online is presented on pages 3-14. Using the following color code may help you move through the questions more efficiently: Information that is likely to be readily available or found online. Information that is slightly more specific, technical or difficult to track down. Information that is likely to be found during a walking or biking audit of your school neighborhood. When you ve finished working through pages 3-14, it s time to begin the online assessment found at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/saferout es/toolkit.html. Upon completion, you ll receive a confirmation email from the MnDOT SRTS coordinator to confirm receipt. To date, more than 200 schools have participated in MnDOT s SRTS Program. As a result, schools provide new walking and bicycling trails, sidewalks and bike racks. They also hold bike rodeos and walk/bike to school days, establish walking school buses and conduct bicycle safety classes (among numerous other creative activities and projects). Through SRTS, youth and their families have more opportunities to stay active and healthy. Experience shows that effective SRTS programs are designed and implemented based on current information on conditions in and around schools. It is important to develop an accurate and broad understanding of the factors that influence walking and biking within a community. A good assessment goes beyond identification of readily perceived problems e.g. an incomplete sidewalk and delves fully into the environmental and behavioral factors that contribute to better walking and bicycling rates among schoolchildren. This tool will help communities assess current conditions and create benchmarks to track progress. The data collected will help MnDOT track barriers to walking and bicycling to school statewide and assess which strategies most effectively support walking and bicycling to school. BUILDING your SRTS TEAM A Safe Routes to School Team is a great way to get people involved in improving walking and biking conditions in your community and it will make completing the online assessment tool that much simpler. In addition to a team leader who will champion your Safe Routes efforts, we recommend at least the following: Principal or assistant principal Parents Community volunteer(s) Students Teachers Law enforcement officer(s) Local road authority (department of public works, county engineer, MnDOT) (From the MnDOT SRTS Handbook, 2011) Page 1

WALKABILITY and BIKEABILITY CHECKLISTS Walkability and bikeability checklists require an in-person walking/biking survey of neighborhood conditions. Completing at least one of these checklists is highly recommended for developing a full understanding of the conditions that affect walking and bicycling in your school neighborhood.* It is a great opportunity to bring together parents, children, community members and local officials. It can also help your SRTS team identify additional challenges that might be addressed under the scope of SRTS plans, projects or activities. The Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center maintains two popular checklists that have previously been used in school neighborhoods in Minnesota: PBIC Walkability Checklist PBIC Bikeability Checklist A pedestrian audit taking place in East Aurora, New York. (Dan Burden, 2006) *Completing an in-person walking/biking survey is a requirement of MnDOT s 2012-2013 SRTS Planning Assistance Awards. Page 2

SRTS Neighborhood Assessment Guide: Instructions To open the SRTS Neighborhood Assessment Tool, you ll need to follow the link found at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/saferoutes/toolkit.html. Make sure that JavaScript and cookies are enabled in order for the assessment tool to work properly. Once you start: You can begin and pause your survey whenever you wish but make sure you don t clear your web history or cookies before hitting Done on the final page. Otherwise your progress will be lost! When you finish with a page, hit the Next button. If you want to go back to a previous page, hit the Prev button. You can enter information for multiple programs (K-5, 6-8, K-8, etc.) at a time, but not for multiple school sites at a time. This tool is meant to encourage assessments at the neighborhood level (as opposed to city-, district- or county-wide). The Welcome! Page Includes an introduction to MnDOT s SRTS program and the SRTS Neighborhood Assessment Tool and discloses how MnDOT will use the information that you provide. Page 3

The SRTS Team and School Information Page Asks for your school address and asks for general information about your SRTS team. Please skip Question 3 if the person responsible for completing your online SRTS Neighborhood Assessment is also your SRTS Team s Champion (i.e. the person who will provide leadership and initiative in planning Safe Routes to School). Page 4

The SRTS Team and School Information Page (cont d) Are any persons from the following professions, groups or backgrounds on your SRTS team? Walkability/Bikeability Audits Has your SRTS team performed a walkability and/or a bikeability audit? If so, the assessment tool will direct you to Question 6 and Question 7 for more information. Please share your findings! If not, the assessment tool will guide you to the next section, Supportive Policies and Programs. Page 5

The Supportive Policies and Programs Page Questions 8-13 pertain to specific policies and programs (and associated strategies and activities) that might affect how students get to school. These questions draw from different areas of professional experience. Not all of your SRTS team members will necessarily be familiar with all of the programs and policies listed. Page 6

The Walk/Bike Zone Page Questions 14 and 15 ask about student enrollment at your school. The Walk/Bike Zone Page (cont d) Questions 16 and 17 ask about where the students of your school live. This is more specific information not all of your SRTS team members will know where to look for it. Identifying where students live in relation to schools in Minnesota is important in designing effective Safe Routes to School projects and activities. Page 7

The Walk/Bike Zone Page (cont d) A walking or biking audit may be needed to find the items in Question 18 (unless one of your SRTS team members is already familiar with the area). The Walk/Bike Zone Page (cont d) Please share any additional information that pertains to your school s walk/bike zone! Please continue to the next section: School Site and Property Page 8

The School Site and Property Page The design of your school site and property can encourage or discourage walking and biking among school children. Congested parking lots and limited access act as barriers. Other elements, like the size of your school property and the number of grade levels, can have mixed effects. Questions 20-25 ask for information that may need input from someone more familiarized with the school property. Page 9

The Street Profile Page The design of the streets around your school also clearly contribute to walking and biking rates among school children. Questions 26-30 ask for information that may need input from someone highly familiar with your neighborhood s street network (i.e. a city engineer or planner, a school district transportation director or a county engineer). Page 10

The Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities and Safety Page Questions 31-34 ask for specific information that may need input from someone highly familiar with your school neighborhood. Prevalent facilities are those that can generally be found throughout your school neighborhood. Facilities that are Present in some cases are those that have large or regular gaps in coverage. The Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities and Safety Page (cont d) Questions 35 and 36 ask for information that would turn up during a walking or biking audit (or would be known by someone highly familiar with your school neighborhood). Page 11

The Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities and Safety Page (cont d) Questions 37-42 ask for specific information that may need input from someone highly familiar with your school neighborhood. Questions 40 and 41 in particular might need input from a city, school district, county or state engineer or planner. Additional information regarding ADA-compliant design can be found at the U.S. Access Board website: www.access-board.gov. Page 12

The Remedial Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Page Questions 43-48 pertain to safety concerns that are addressed by pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. This is specific information that might need input from someone highly familiar with your school neighborhood or a city, school district, county or state engineer or planner. Page 13

The Connectivity and Convenience Page Conventional cul-de-sacs limit walking and biking access while increasing dependency on automobiles. Adding walking and biking connections to conventional cul-de-sacs can reduce the distance that schoolchildren walk or bike to get to school. Page 14

Thank you for completing the MnDOT SRTS Assessment Tool Guide! You should now be ready to enter your answers in to the MnDOT online SRTS Assessment Tool found at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/saferoutes/toolkit.html. Upon entering your information into the online tool, you will receive a confirmation email from the MnDOT Safe Routes to School coordinator. If you have any questions, please email saferoutes.dot@state.mn.us or call (651) 366-4195. Page 15