Sea State Report. Chapel Point wave buoy, RP037/L/2013 December Title here in 8pt Arial (change text colour to black) i

Similar documents
Sea State Report Lincolnshire

Sea State Report Suffolk Year 3 and summary for October 2006 September 2009

Sea State Report. Suffolk (Year 1 Oct 2006 Sept 2007) RP012/S/2009 July Title here in 8pt Arial (change text colour to black) i

Coastal Morphology Technical Note Lincshore. TN002/L/2013 March Title here in 8pt Arial (change text colour to black) i

Sea State Report. Essex (Year 1 Oct 2006 Sept 2007) RP014/E/2010 January Title here in 8pt Arial (change text colour to black) i

Compiled by Uwe Dornbusch. Edited by Cherith Moses

CMS Modeling of the North Coast of Puerto Rico

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

Metocean criteria for fatigue assessment. Rafael V. Schiller 5th COPEDI Seminar, Oct 8th 2014.

Coastal Wave Energy Dissipation: Observations and Modeling

Waves. G. Cowles. General Physical Oceanography MAR 555. School for Marine Sciences and Technology Umass-Dartmouth

Coastal Morphology Report

Nortek Technical Note No.: TN-021. Chesapeake Bay AWAC Evaluation

Wave data recording program. Tweed Heads/Brisbane wave climate annual summary May 2012 April 2013

Marine Renewables Industry Association. Marine Renewables Industry: Requirements for Oceanographic Measurements, Data Processing and Modelling

INTRODUCTION TO COASTAL ENGINEERING

Figure 4, Photo mosaic taken on February 14 about an hour before sunset near low tide.

of monsoon waves off U ran, west coast of India

To: William Woods, Jenni Austin Job No: CentrePort Harbour Deepening Project - Comments on community queries

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Characterizing Ireland s wave energy resource

Taranaki Tsunami Inundation Analysis. Prepared for Taranaki Civil Defence Emergency Management Group. Final Version

South Bay Coastal Ocean Observing System California Clean Beaches Initiative

Southern California Beach Processes Study

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

Pathways Interns: Annika O Dea, Ian Conery, Andrea Albright

Chapter. The Dynamic Ocean

Properties. terc.ucdavis.edu 8

Influence of oceanographic processes on coastal erosion, morphology and inundation

Long-Term Performance of an AWAC Wave Gage, Chesapeake Bay, VA

Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

OCEANOGRAPHY STUDY GUIDE

Appendix 3. Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies

Directed Reading. Section: Ocean Currents. a(n). FACTORS THAT AFFECT SURFACE CURRENTS

The Composition of Seawater

Wave research at Department of Oceanography, University of Hawai i

Sand Bank Passage. Fiji nearshore wave hindcast ' ' 19 00'

1 st Tidal and Water Level Working Group Meeting DHN, Niteroi, Brazil 31/03/09 02/04/09 Vertical Offshore Reference Framework (VORF) Chris Jones

Appendix D: SWAN Wave Modelling

The Movement of Ocean Water. Currents

Chapter 10 Lecture Outline. The Restless Oceans

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

An Atlas of Oceanic Internal Solitary Waves (February 2004) by Global Ocean Associates Prepared for Office of Naval Research Code 322 PO

Aalborg Universitet. Estimation of wave conditions at Liseleje location Bogarino, Bruno; Brorsen, Michael. Publication date: 2007

Name Class Date. Use the terms from the following list to complete the sentences below. Each term may be used only once. Some terms may not be used.

Nature Of Marine winds, Waves and Swells over West African Coasts Case study of Victoria Island beach in Lagos, Nigeria

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 15 Earth Science, 12e Tarbuck/Lutgens

PUV Wave Directional Spectra How PUV Wave Analysis Works

A FINAL REPORT BY PARTRAC LIMITED: MAY 2006

MOTUS Wave Buoys. Powered By the Aanderaa MOTUS Directional Wave Sensor

Australian Northwest Shelf

Reading Material. Inshore oceanography, Anikouchine and Sternberg The World Ocean, Prentice-Hall

GNSS Technology for the Determination of Real-Time Tidal Information

Appendix E Cat Island Borrow Area Analysis

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

SURF ZONE HYDRODYNAMICS COMPARISON OF MODELLING AND FIELD DATA

Kavala Bay. Fiji nearshore wave hindcast ' ' 19 00'

Technical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis Island Harbour Club, Gananoque, Ontario

KC Scout Kansas City s Bi-State Transportation Management Center

: Hydrodynamic input for 2D Vessel Simulations (HY- 0027)

SCIENCE OF TSUNAMI HAZARDS

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

DUXBURY WAVE MODELING STUDY

IMPACTS OF COASTAL PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON THE COASTS OF CRETE: NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS

HYDROGRAPHIC AND SITE SURVEY REPORT

AGGREGATE DREDGING AND THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT

Avaavaroa passage. Rarotonga nearshore wave hindcast 21 09' 21 12' 21 15' 21 18' ' ' ' '

Tides. Tides: longest waves. or seas. or ripples

SURFACE CURRENTS AND TIDES

JCOMM Technical Workshop on Wave Measurements from Buoys

Mango Bay_Resort. Fiji nearshore wave hindcast ' ' 19 00'

April 7, Prepared for: The Caribbean Disaster Emergency Response Agency Prepared by: CEAC Solutions Co. Ltd.

Observed and simulated wavetide interaction in a region of. high tidal flow

page - Laboratory Exercise #5 Shoreline Processes

Model Test Setup and Program for Experimental Estimation of Surface Loads of the SSG Kvitsøy Pilot Plant from Extreme Wave Conditions

Ngatangiia passage. Rarotonga nearshore wave hindcast 21 09' 21 12' 21 15' 21 15' 21 18' ' ' ' '

Offshore Wind Energy Stringent quality assurance and quality control. Coastal and Freshwater Fast responding and flexible organisation

Evaluation of June 9, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study for Town of Weymouth, Norfolk, Co, MA

Chapter - Oceans and Coasts

COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE METOFFICE UK-WATERS WAVE MODEL WITH A NETWORK OF SHALLOW WATER MOORED BUOY DATA

Shorelines Earth - Chapter 20 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

COFFS HARBOUR SEDIMENT MODELLING AND INVESTIGATION

Cross-shore sediment transports on a cut profile for large scale land reclamations

Honiara. Solomon Islands

Carbon Trust Offshore Wind Accelerator. OWA floating LiDAR campaign: Babcock trial at Gwynt Y Môr Copenhagen, 11 March 2015 Megan Smith

BILLY BISHOP TORONTO CITY AIRPORT PRELIMINARY RUNWAY DESIGN COASTAL ENGINEERING STUDY

TRIAXYS Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Comparison Study

Rimatara. French Polynesia

WAVE FORECASTING FOR OFFSHORE WIND FARMS

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

Wave energy converter effects on wave and sediment circulation

Port Moresby. Papua New Guinea

Unit 11 Lesson 2 How Does Ocean Water Move? Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

Appendix M: Durras Lake Tailwater Conditions

Inter-comparison of wave measurement by accelerometer and GPS wave buoy in shallow water off Cuddalore, east coast of India

REPORT. Skardon River Bauxite Project - Additional Coastal Assessment. Ports and Coastal Environmental Pty Ltd

Earth s oceans covers 71 % _ of the planet s surface. In reality, Earth s ocean waters are all. interconnected as part of a single large global ocean.

Suva. Fiji. A copy of this report is available at ' ' 18 30' 19 00' ' ' ' '

Nuku alofa. Tonga. A copy of this report is available at ' 21 00' 21 30' 22 00' ' ' ' '

Transcription:

Sea State Report Chapel Point wave buoy, 2012-2013 RP037/L/2013 December 2013 Title here in 8pt Arial (change text colour to black) i

We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local authorities, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Published by: Shoreline Monitoring Group Environment Agency Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way Orton Goldhay, Peterborough PE2 5ZR Email: enquiries@environmentagency.gov.uk www.environment-agency.gov.uk Environment Agency 2013 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Further copies of this report are available from our publications catalogue: http://publications.environmentagency.gov.uk or our National Customer Contact Centre: T: 03708 506506 E: enquiries@environment-agency.gov.uk. ii Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR

Anglian Coastal Monitoring programme Figure 1.1: Map of instrument locations Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR iii

Contents 1 Anglian Coastal Monitoring 1 1.1 Wave & tide monitoring 1 1.2 Wave climate & sea state reports 1 2 Chapel Point Directional Waverider Buoy 2 2.1 Instrument description 2 2.2 Instrument location 2 2.3 Instrument deployment 3 3 Wave statistics 4 3.1 Annual summary statistics 2012-13 4 3.2 Significant wave height 5 3.3 Wave period 6 3.4 Wave direction 8 4 Storm calendar 9 4.1 Storm events 9 5 Summary 10 List of Tables Table 3.1: Min, Max and Mean statistics (July 2012 June 2013) 4 Table 3.2: Monthly mean statistics for the reporting period (July 2012 June 2013) 5 Table 3.3: Annual significant wave height (Hm0) occurrences per height band (%) 6 Table 4.1: Storm event statistics on 27 th October, 2013 9 List of Figures Figure 1.1: Map of instrument locations iii Figure 2.1: Chapel Point (LWB2) location map 3 Figure 3.1: Significant wave height (Hm0) (2012-13) 6 Figure 3.2: Peak period (July 2012 July 2013) 7 Figure 3.3: Significant wave height Hm0 (m) vs peak wave period Tp (s) (July 2012 June 2013) 7 Figure 3.4: Significant wave height Hm0 (m) vs mean wave period Tz (s) (July 2012 June 2013) 8 Figure 3.5: Wave direction ( ) plot at LWB2 for 2012-13 8 Figure 4.1: Storm events exceeding 2.75 m (blue) and 3 m (red) (1 st July 2012 30 th June 2013) 9 List of Photos Photo 1: Deployed directional Waverider buoy 2 Photo 2: Chapel Point DWR in July 2013 on deck prior to the latest deployment 4 iv Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR

1 Anglian Coastal Monitoring 1.1 Wave & tide monitoring The Shoreline Monitoring Group (SMG) based within the Flood & Coastal Risk Management function of the Environment Agency (EA) (Anglian Region) provides strategic monitoring of the Anglian coast through the Anglian Coastal Monitoring project. Phase VIII of this programme runs from 2011 to 2016. The hydrodynamics monitoring element of the programme consists of a network of Directional Waverider (DWR) buoys deployed off the Anglian coast. The DWR buoys provide real-time wave spectra and GPS positions via satellite link. The wave data are uploaded to the WaveNet 1 website maintained by the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquacultural Science (Cefas) on behalf of the Department of Environment Food & Rural Affairs (Defra), allowing public access to the programme s real-time monitoring records. 1.2 Wave climate & sea state reports The aim of the report is to present the nearshore wave conditions at the instrument location in order to feed into studies and management activities of the Anglian coast. The Sea State reports make use of the processed onboard instrument logged data from the wave buoy (Environment Agency, 2012). Logged data is processed and quality checked by our survey contractor, Gardline Environmental 2. The wave buoys are fully calibrated before deployment and data translation and processing is carried out using the instrument manufacturer s software including Datawell s W@ves 21 3. 1 Cefas WaveNet: www.cefas.co.uk/data/wavenet.aspx 2 Gardline Environmental: www.gardlinemarinesciences.com/page/gardline-environmental 3 Datawell W@ves 21: www.datawell.nl/ Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR 1

Photo 1: Deployed directional Waverider buoy (Photo: Environment Agency) 2 Chapel Point Directional Waverider Buoy 2.1 Instrument description The DWR buoys provide real-time information on waves approaching the Anglian coast. The buoys are moored to the seabed by an elasticised line allowing them to float on the surface and record wave movements. The buoys measure the orbital motions of the water at the surface rather than the surface slope. These continuous measurements are then sent ashore through high frequency radio signals to base stations, such as RNLI Life Boat stations. We can then monitor and log these data streams through a broadband internet connection. Wave spectra and GPS positions are also sent via satellites. The real-time wave data are publically available on the WaveNet 1 website. Every 30 minutes the DWR logs processed spectral data of 2304 samples measured over a 19.2 minute period. The logged spectra have a 64 frequency band energy density resolution. The first 30 minutes of each hour is processed and quality checked to give a representative value of the hour. DWR buoys are serviced and swapped over annually when they are re calibrated and the onboard logger data recovered. 2.2 Instrument location The Chapel Point Waverider buoy (LWB2) is situated off Chapel Saint Leonards and Chapel Point on the Lincolnshire coast at 53 14.707.494 N, 000 26.763 E. It is moored in 12 mcd of water, just north of the Lincs offshore wind farm and inside of the Inner Dowsing Banks and Overfalls. The buoy is also about 20 km from North Ridge, Dudgeon Shoals and Race Banks. Despite the presence of these banks the Lincolnshire coast is particularly exposed with a trend of beach erosion and where annual sediment renourishment occurs. The buoy records the long fetch, north-easterly waves impacting on this stretch of the coast, 2 Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR

On the Lincolnshire coast the flood tidal flow generally moves south and the ebb tidal current flows north (Haskoning, 2005). Along the coast, wave action dominates but the tidal current residuals become more significant in the nearshore and offshore. These currents regulate sediment transport and the development of sand banks in the area, such as the Skegness Middle. Interaction between the tidal currents and sandbanks creates areas of turbidity known as overfalls. The Saltfleet, Trusthorpe and Inner Dowsing Overfalls modify the waves approaching the Lincolnshire coast, with those passing over the latter being recorded by the wave buoy. Onshore the Lincolnshire coast frontage is monitored through LiDAR, aerial photography and topographic surveys of the following monitoring cells; Grimsby Cleethorpes, Donna Nook, Saltfleet Theddlethorpe, Mablethorpe Skegness and Gibraltar Point. Figure 2.1: Chapel Point (LWB2) location map 2.3 Instrument deployment The Chapel Point buoy is a new deployment as part of Phase VIII of the Anglian Coastal Monitoring. It was first deployed on the 23 rd May 2012 and recovered on the 7 th July 2013 (Gardline 2013). Over the period July 2012 to June 2013 the data return of the logged records achieved was 100 %. Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR 3

Photo 2: Chapel Point DWR in July 2013 on deck prior to the latest deployment (Photo: Gardline Environmental). 3 Wave statistics This section presents the key wave parameters in the annual time series. In future reports this will also include all the observations over the instrument s extending deployment life to describe sea conditions at the instrument location. This shows the general pattern of waves represented by a spectrum of waves of different frequencies, heights and directions through statistical measurements, time series and averages over the duration of a year. A description of all of the parameters can be found in the glossary section at the end of this document. 3.1 Annual summary statistics 2012-13 Table 3.1 below details the statistical summaries of records logged over the last deployment from July 2012 to June 2013. Significant wave height Hs (m) Peak period Tp (s) Max: 3.16 25.0 Min: 0.09 1.72 Mean: 0.80 6.07 Table 3.1: Min, Max and Mean statistics (July 2012 June 2013) 4 Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR

2012 2013 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Hm0 (m) 0.56 0.57 0.68 0.82 0.78 0.94 0.81 1.00 1.31 0.80 0.77 0.61 Tp (s) 5.62 4.69 5.42 6.22 6.92 6.33 5.82 6.85 7.46 6.19 6.14 5.20 Tz (s) 3.47 3.30 3.39 3.78 3.69 3.90 3.72 4.09 4.63 3.73 3.74 3.64 Mdir ( ) 25 27 28 28 31 28 65 31 69 30 25 28 T ( C) 2.66 2.62 2.64 2.82 2.77 2.88 2.83 3.00 3.27 2.84 2.84 2.82 Mdir is a monthly modal statistic Table 3.2: Monthly mean statistics for the reporting period (July 2012 June 2013) 3.2 Significant wave height The annual mean wave height recorded at Chapel Point is 0.8 m. The nearshore acoustic wave and current meter (AWAC) deployed at Chapel Point, in a water depth of 5 mcd, from 2006 2009, logged an overall mean wave height of 0.65 m. In comparison, the NWB1 buoy deployed off the North Norfolk coast also logged a mean height of 0.8 m for this year. The WWB1 buoy located in at North Well in the mouth of the Wash recorded 0.62 m (see Figure 1.1 for wave buoy deployment locations). The highest waves are recorded in the winter months with the highest monthly mean values occurring during February and March. In March the mean significant wave height was 1.31 m. As this is the first year of deployment no storm threshold level has been designated for the site. However for illustration, Figure 3.1 shows five occurrences of waves exceeding 2.75 m and a single storm event, at the end of October, where waves exceeded 3 m in height. Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR 5

Wave height (m) 3.5 3 LWB2 Significant wave height (Hm0) 01 July 2012-30 June 2013 LWB2 threshold 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Jul12 Oct12 Jan13 Apr13 Date Figure 3.1: Significant wave height (Hm0) (2012-13) Annual Hs occurrences per height band (%) Year 0 0.5 m 0.5 1 m 1 1.5 m 1.5 2 m 2 3 m 3 4 m 2012 33.41 47.84 12.69 4.02 2.00 0.03 2013 24.06 43.87 19.99 6.60 5.49 n/a Table 3.3: Annual significant wave height (Hm0) occurrences per height band (%) 3.3 Wave period Peak period is also known as the dominant wave period and describes the frequency with the highest energy. The gentle slope of the nearshore bathymetry leads to wave shoaling on the Lincolnshire coast. Offshore the overfalls such as Inner Dowsing also modify the wave period and therefore wave heights. The presence of sandbanks can cause the offshore waves passing over the overfalls to slowly rise and even break. In addition to the bathymetry, interaction with the strong currents influences the incoming waves, and they are the most likely reason for the short wave periods and heights observed. The greatest concentration of waves passing the buoy location are wind generated, with a short period of 3 6 seconds (see Figure 3.2). There a number of longer period waves, associated with stormier periods and with swell waves with a peak period of over 20 seconds recorded. 6 Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR

Hm0 (m) Occurrence 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 5 10 15 20 Peak period (s) Figure 3.2: Peak period (July 2012 July 2013) Figures 3.3 and 3.4 show the joint distribution of significant wave height (Hm0 (m)) and wave period for July 2012 June 2013. Figure 3.3 shows the peak wave period (Tp) against wave height and Figure 3.4 displays the mean wave period (Tz) against wave height. The peak period data presents several wave distributions of; waves generated locally by wind with short periods, the stormier, rougher conditions, where waves achieve moderate wave periods, and finally the lower wave heights but of longer period of over 15 seconds of the swell waves coming through the North Sea. 4 3 2 1 0 0 5 10 Tp (s) 15 20 25 30 Figure 3.3: Significant wave height Hm0 (m) vs peak wave period Tp (s) (July 2012 June 2013) Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR 7

Hm0 (m) 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 Tz (s) 4 5 6 7 8 Figure 3.4: Significant wave height Hm0 (m) vs mean wave period Tz (s) (July 2012 June 2013) 3.4 Wave direction Figure 3.5: Wave direction ( ) plot at LWB2 for 2012-13 There is a distinct and consistently prominent north-east wave direction recorded at the buoy. This record is consistent with the nearshore AWACs deployed at Chapel Point 8 Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR

Wave Height Hm0 (m) and Skegness in 2006 to 2009. There is a small number of waves approaching from the south and travelling along the east facing coastline. These waves may be associated with residual tidal flows. 4 Storm calendar 4.1 Storm events The occurrence of high wave events is tracked through a storm calendar. The calendar allows seasonal characteristics and annual storminess to be monitored. In the first year of deployment there was one storm event where waves exceeded 3 m. This instance is detailed in Table 4.1, with statistics of the highest wave of the event shown. The wave was recorded on the morning of the 27 th October 2012. Weather conditions were that of heavy showers on the east coast turning to sleet and snowfall in places. The coast experienced gusty winds with several low pressure troughs and winds travelling through the North Sea (UKHO1). At North Well a 2.58 m wave, the highest of 2012-13, was also logged by the wave buoy at this time. Date Hm0 (m) Mdir ( ) Tp (s) Tz (s) 05:30 27/10/2013 Table 4.1: Storm event statistics on 27 th October, 2013 3.16 25 9.09 5.90 Figure 4.1 (overleaf) shows the occurrences when wave heights have crossed thresholds of 2.75 (blue) and 3 m (red). The storm calendar serves as a record of storminess and the frequency of storm waves at the buoy location each year. 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 10/2012 11/2012 12/2012 01/2013 02/2013 03/2013 04/2013 05/2013 06/2013 Month/Year Figure 4.1: Storm events exceeding 2.75 m (blue) and 3 m (red) (1 st July 2012 30 th June 2013) Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR 9

5 Summary The east facing Lincolnshire coast has a gentle beach slope and a number of offshore overfalls and banks. The Chapel Point DWR is situated just west of the Inner Dowsing Overfall and banks. This bathymetry, in addition to strong currents interacting with incoming waves, results in the wave characteristics recorded over the year by the buoy. Waves are consistent throughout the year and come from a north-easterly direction. These waves have a significant fetch and the buoy has logged wave periods of over 20 seconds. The tidal regime is generally that of a southerly flow on the flood tide and northerly on the ebb. There is an erosion trend along most of the Lincolnshire coast south of Mablethorpe with sediment suspected to move south or offshore to the banks. Wave heights are largest during the winter period, particularly February and March. The highest wave of the year was recorded in October. This occurred in the morning of the 27 th October, and was the only storm event where waves were logged exceeding 3 m. References Environment Agency, 2012. Sea State Report, Lincolnshire, Year 3 and summary for 2006 2009. RP027/L2012. Shoreline Monitoring Group Environment Agency, Peterborough, 2012. Gardline 2013, Chapel Point and Northwell Waverider Service Report, Report for the Environment Agency. GELSR3. Gardline Environmental Oceanography Department, Great Yarmouth, July 2013. Haskoning, 2005. Scoping study for wave and water level monitoring and analysis: Lincolnshire. Specialist Team Consultancy: Geomorphology, Project number: STCG/2004/89. Report for the Environment Agency, Anglian Region. Royal Haskoning Uk Ltd, Peterborough, March 2005. UKHO1. www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/2012/october.html [Accessed 1st October, 2013]. 10 Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR

List of abbreviations ACM Anglian Coastal Monitoring AWAC Acoustic Wave And Current meter CD Chart Datum Cefas Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquacultural Science Defra Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs DWR Directional Waverider EA Environment Agency GPS Global Positioning System ODN Ordnance Datum Newlyn QA Quality Assurance RNLI Royal National Lifeboat Institution SMG Shoreline Monitoring Group Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR 11

Glossary Bathymetry The measured shape and depth contours of the sea bed. Fetch The uninterrupted distance over water which the wind acts to produce waves. Intertidal The coastal area between the Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) and Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT). Maximum wave height (Hmax) Statistic of the maximum wave height recorded in a period of time. Mean direction (Mdir) The average or main direction from which waves have come, measured over a period of time. Mean Sea Level - Generally refers to 'still water level' above a fixed datum (excluding wave influences), averaged over a period of time such that periodic changes in level (e.g. due to the tides) are smoothed out. Mean wave period (Tz) Also referred to as the zero crossing period, a description of the average wave period over a duration of time. Neap Tide - The tide that occurs when the tide-generating forces of the sun and moon are positioned at right angles to each other. The neap tide has the lowest tidal range. Ordnance Datum (OD) A specific datum or plane to which depths or heights are referred to. Peak period (Tp) Also called dominant wave period and Tpeak, it is the wave period (time for two successive waves to pass a point) associated with the largest wave energy, obtained from the spectral "peak frequency" i.e. the frequency band that has the largest energy. Sea (waves) Waves generated at a storm system, under a height of 2 m. Significant wave height (Hm0) Statistical calculation taken from the spectral analysis to describe the average wave height. Spring tide - The tide that occurs when the tide-generating forces of the sun and moon are in alignment and results in a higher than average tidal range. Storm surge - A storm surge is the additional sea level accounted for by a storm. The rise in water level causes a propagating bulge of water on the open coast caused by the action of wind stress and atmospheric pressure on the sea surface. Storm waves Wind driven waves associated with a storm system, these waves have a higher frequency than swell waves and therefore can cause multiply frequency peaks in the spectra. In a multiple peaked spectrum the mean wave period (Tz) may not be a measure of the frequency where the peak energy occurs. Swell (waves) Waves that have travelled out of the area they were generated. Swell waves characteristically have a flatter shape and longer period. In spectral analysis swell waves have a low frequency, with a peak period (Tp) where energy decays in the frequencies either side. Wave climate The average condition of the waves at a location over a period of time, represented by wave statistics such as height, period and direction. 12 Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR

Wave spectra The wave energy in a band of frequencies, describing the total energy transmitted by a wave-field. Sea State Report RP037/L/2013 Chapel Point DWR 13