Flashing Yellow Arrow Left-Turn Signal Guidelines

Similar documents
Significant Changes to California's Yellow Signal Timing Protocols

Washington St. Corridor Study

PART 4 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Abstract. Background. protected/permissive operation. Source: Google Streetview, Fairview/Orchard intersection

TRANSMITTAL LETTER. Revision to Publication 149, Chapter 20 (Criteria for the Design of Traffic Signal Supports) - March 2009 Edition

2016 THE Short Course

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

Flashing Yellow Arrow Experience

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY CONFERENCE October 18, 2017 FLASHING YELLOW ARROWS

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

Memorandum MAR or in part.

Chapter 5 5. INTERSECTIONS 5.1. INTRODUCTION

PENNSYLVANIA IMPLEMENTATION OF FLASHING YELLOW ARROW

Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

1982 by Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: ISBN:

S 0659 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES INTRODUCTION

by MUTCD standards and guidance include signs, signals, pavement

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

Proposed changes to Massachusetts MUTCD Supplement

DPS 201 RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON (RRFB)

2004 NC Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)

Flashing Yellow Arrows (A different left turn option) ASCE Meeting June 9, 2015 Kerry C. NeSmith, PE Deputy State Maintenance Engineer

Yellow and Red Intervals It s Just a Matter of Time. 58 th Annual Alabama Transportation Conference February 9, 2015

The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Brief) Highlights for Arizona Practitioners. Arizona Department of Transportation

Shortening or omitting a pedestrian change interval when transitioning into preemption

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Bicycle Technical Committee and Signals Technical Committee. Recommendation Bicycle Signal Faces

SCOPE Application, Design, Operations,

Experience with Traffic Actuated Signals

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

EVALUATION OF HAWK SIGNAL AT GEORGIA AVENUE AND HEMLOCK STREET, NW IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FINAL REPORT. August 30, 2010

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE TRAFFIC CODE UPDATE MASTER RECOMMENDATION REPORT: 9.14, 9.16, 9.18

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

New in the MUTCD: The Flashing Yellow Arrow Presented at the 57 th Annual Traffic and Safety Conference May 17, 2006

Project Team. Refined Pedestrian Crossing Toolbox. Problem Statement. Aerial of Study Corridor. Crossing Accommodations and Pedestrian Fatalities

RE: City of Portland Request to Experiment with HAWK/Bike signal

11/17/2015 Copyright 2015 by CTC, Inc. (CTC) 1

Safety Evaluation at Innovative Geometric Designs Gilbert Chlewicki, PE Advanced Transportation Solutions

Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer

Hidden Oaks Elementary School

Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Analysis for Corridor Planning Projects

Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons

Published: August 2009

FHWA Experimentation #4-298(E) Modified HAWK Signal and Bike Signal - Draft Report

SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS

Rules of the Road Committee (RORC)

Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Bruce Friedman and Scott Wainwright FHWA MUTCD Team

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

Electronic Traffic Control Device Guidelines

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

STEP. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons. Safe Transportation for Every Pedestrian

Comparison of the Green Arrow and the Circular Green for Turn Prohibition to Reduce Wrong-Way Movements at Interchange Terminals

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

Driver Behavior in the Presence of Pedestrians at Signalized Intersections Operating the Flashing Yellow Arrow

Potential Bicycle Facility on Bayou Street Mobile, Alabama

City of Cape Coral Traffic Calming. City Council May 16,

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Chapter V TRAFFIC CONTROLS. Tewodros N.

Traffic Control Devices

Evolving Roadway Design Policies for Walking and Bicycling

HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL 2010: NEW SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION METHODOLOGY. James A. Bonneson, Ph.D., P.E.

800 RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS Traffic Engineering Manual

Right turns at signalised intersections: Can they be standardised?

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

CTCDC California Traffic Control Devices Committee

Appendix B Warrants, Standards, and Guidelines for Traffic Control Devices used at Senior Citizen and Disabled Person Crossings

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines 2016

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

Appendix A-6. Signing and Marking Guidelines. Number Name Pages. 2B.06 Signing at T Intersections 1. 2B.12 Pedestrians in Crosswalk 1

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

Traffic Engineering and Highway Safety Bulletin Retiming Traffic Signals

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies

Module 3 Developing Timing Plans for Efficient Intersection Operations During Moderate Traffic Volume Conditions

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Strategies for Making Multimodal Environments Safer. Kim Kolody Silverman, CH2M

Section 400 Signal Design. Engineering Branch

Appendix F: Wayfinding Protocol and Best Practices

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STATISTICS

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Guide Recommendations and Case Study. FHWA Safety Program.

1 To provide direction to Administration when determining the appropriate Pedestrian Crossing Control Device for a particular location.

This Manual Part recommends functional/operating guidelines for control of automatic grade crossing warning systems. Draft

Frequently Asked Questions

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

Pavement Markings (1 of 3)

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

Bicyclist Signing Guidelines

ICBC invests $1.175 million to help make Surrey, Delta and White Rock s roads safer in 2013

Effects of Traffic Signal Retiming on Safety. Peter J. Yauch, P.E., PTOE Program Manager, TSM&O Albeck Gerken, Inc.

DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL CHAPTER 6 TRAFFIC CONTROL

Tight Diamond Interchange versus Single Point Urban Interchange: Pedestrians Prospective

Transcription:

Flashing Yellow Arrow Left-Turn Signal Guidelines General What Is It? It s a new type of signal placed OVER the left-turn lane at a signalized intersection. The signal display includes a flashing yellow arrow. Other displays on the signal are a steady green arrow, steady yellow arrow and steady red arrow. In coming years, this type of signal will be used by Michigan s roadway agencies in place of the flashing-red left-turn signals that are now common. How Will the New Signals Operate? In most locations, the flashing yellow arrow display will be part of a four-arrow display. In areas where a total signal replacement is not possible, a three-section signal would be used where the bottom display will display either the flashing yellow arrow or steady green arrow. Below is what each arrow display means: MDOT Traffic and Safety Page 1 of 6 10/5/2007

Where Will These Signals be Installed? Michigan roadway agencies will be converting signals that have a flashing red ball for left-turns to the flashing yellow arrow. You will begin to see flashing yellow arrow leftturn signals at intersections across the United States. The Federal Highway Administration has begun the process of making these signals the standard for signalized left-turns. It will, however, likely take several years for the standard to be adopted and implemented by all road agencies and municipalities nationwide. Why Is it a Better Left-Turn Signal? It s Safer A national study demonstrated that drivers made fewer mistakes with the new signals than with traditional left-turn arrow signals. The new signals also eliminate the flashing red to solid red signal display. It s More Efficient The new signals provide traffic engineers with more options to handle variable traffic volumes. It s More Consistent You ll see the same signals in every state because the new signals will be mandated throughout the U.S. MDOT Traffic and Safety Page 2 of 6 10/5/2007

Technical Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) The design and operational requirements for the flashing yellow arrow (attached) are provided in Federal Highway Administration s (FHWA) March 20, 2006 Interim Approval for Use of Flashing Yellow Arrow for Permissive Left. These requirements take precedence over any conflicting provisions of the existing Section 4D.06 of the 2005 Michigan MUTCD. On June 13, 2007 statewide approval was granted by FHWA to all roadway agencies. These agencies should be guided by this document when implementing the flashing yellow arrow on their roadways. The use of flashing yellow arrow is restricted to exclusive left-turn lanes. FLASHING YELLOW ARROW Signal Face Arrangements Four Arrow Section Heads Permissive/Protected Four Arrow Section Heads Protected/ Permissive MDOT Traffic and Safety Page 3 of 6 10/5/2007

Three Arrow Section Heads Permissive/Protected and Protected/ Permissive Although permitted in FHWA s March 20, 2006 Interim Approval, the use of a three arrow section heads should be avoided where possible. The bottom section of a three arrow section head traffic signal is referred to as bi-modal due to the appearance of two different arrow indications (solid green arrow and flashing yellow arrow) at different times during the operation. Left-Turn Phasing Guidelines Consistency is essential in the implementation of left-turn phasing. Guidelines have been developed by the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) to provide a better understanding when to consider left-turn phasing and what type of phasing to implement. The guidelines are available at: http://mdotwas1.mdot.state.mi.us/public/tands/plans.cfm Look under Traffic Signals, Correspondence/Guidelines for Left-Turn Signal Phasing Guidelines. Varying Left-Turn Phasing Although cited as a means to improve the coordination along a corridor throughout the day the varying of the left-turn phase between leading and lagging by time of day should be kept to a minimum in response to motorist s expectations. Changing Left-Turn Phasing Operation When implementing the flashing yellow arrow be sensitive to changing the left-turn phasing operation. A change in motorist s expectations should be kept to a minimum. Changing a lagging operation to a leading at the implementation of the flashing yellow arrow may introduce confusion and disrespect of the signal. All-Reds All-reds should be displayed after all phase changes. The length of the all-red should be, at minimum, per Michigan Department of Transportation Traffic Signal Guideline for VEHICLE CHANGE INTERVALS. The guidelines are available at: http://mdotwas1.mdot.state.mi.us/public/tands/plans.cfm Look under Traffic Signals, Correspondence/Guidelines for Change Interval Guidelines. MDOT Traffic and Safety Page 4 of 6 10/5/2007

Controller Assembly Hardware and Software Considerations This section is an abbreviated document containing technical information regarding the traffic signal control assemblies typically used in Michigan as it relates to implementation of the flashing yellow arrow display at signalized intersections. Standard NEMA TS1/TS2 specifications do not address the controls necessary to implement a four section flashing yellow arrow signal display. Special considerations must therefore be made for the following major signal control cabinet components: 1) Controller Unit (CU), 2) Conflict Monitor Unit (CMU) and 3) Terminal Facility (TF). 1. The Controller Unit 1.1. Actuated CUs Actuated CUs must have the appropriate firmware as they do not otherwise have the capability to operate the four circuit flashing yellow arrow signal face. CU software is necessary for the actuated controllers that will provide not only the proper sequencing of the four indications but must also flash the Yellow Permissive Arrow. This is achieved by utilizing an overlap for the Red/Yellow/Flashing Yellow indications and a phase output for the Green indication. The controller unit software for EPAC actuated controller units commonly used in Michigan must be 3.33b or newer to properly sequence the flashing yellow arrow signal. EPAC model 30 and model 50 units have been shipping with this software since early 2006. Model 50 and 16 Mhz model 30 units that do not have this software can be upgraded to 3.33b. It is not possible to upgrade other older EPAC controller units to 3.33b 1.2. Pretimed CUs The EPIC140 Pretimed interval oriented CUs can be programmed to operate the flashing yellow arrow with all older and currently utilized firmware. 2. The Conflict Monitor Unit The CMUs utilized in Michigan in both actuated and pretimed controller assemblies in the past do not have the capability of monitoring the flashing yellow arrow signal. Eberle Design, Inc (EDI) has manufactured the majority of the monitors used on intersections in Michigan since the early 1980 s. The existing monitor must be either replaced with a new flashing yellow arrow type monitor, or in the case of an existing EDI LE type monitor manufactured after January 2001, may be returned to the manufacturer and have the firmware upgraded to operate a flashing yellow arrow signal. 3. The Terminal Facility MDOT Traffic and Safety Page 5 of 6 10/5/2007

In both actuated and pretimed controller assemblies, concerns regarding the TF when implementing the flashing yellow arrow display are primarily related to the additional signal circuits required. A typical 8 phase intersection with 4 left turn movements will require 4 extra circuits for the 4 th level that will be additional on the left turn signals. For example, the standard 8 phase cabinet with 12 load switch positions will operate a typical 8 phase intersection with flashing yellow arrows. This can be accomplished by having the green arrows outputted on the otherwise unused yellow section of the pedestrian load switches. In this configuration all load switch circuits will be utilized and there will not be any additional circuits available in the terminal facilities for other special movements, disappearing legend signs, advance warning beacons, preempt confirmation lights, etc. There is also a 16 load switch terminal facility available for actuated controllers that fits in the standard NEMA 6 size ground mount cabinets that agencies may want to consider for use at flashing yellow arrow locations. In this configuration spare load switch circuits will be available. Please note extra load switches and/or open load switch positions may be needed for right turn green arrows. Implementation The following implementation dates have been agreed upon between MDOT and FHWA: All signal designs starting after January 1, 2008, shall be the flashing yellow arrow All new signal installations/modernizations after October 1, 2008, involving left-turn phasing shall include the flashing yellow arrow Removal date of all existing flashing red installations yet to be determined. MDOT Traffic and Safety Page 6 of 6 10/5/2007