LITTLE SALMON AND MAGUNDY RIVERS

Similar documents
MAYO MOOSE MANAGEMENT UNIT

MOOSE SURVEY RACKLA AREA LATE-WINTER Prepared by: Mark O'Donoghue, Joe Bellmore, Sophie Czetwertynski and Susan Westover

MAYO MOOSE MANAGEMENT UNIT

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer

2009 WMU 328 Moose and Elk

2009 WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer

2008 WMU 360 moose, white tailed deer and mule deer. Section Authors: Robb Stavne, Dave Stepnisky and Mark Heckbert

2008 WMU 359 moose, mule deer, and white tailed deer

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 536 moose

2008 WMU 106 mule deer

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

INVENTORY STUDIES KLAZA CARIBOU HERD 2012 ACTIVITIES

MAYO COMMUNITY MOOSE MONITORING PROJECT REVIEW

Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group 2012 Annual Report (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2012) Member Agencies

Big Game Survey Results

CHISANA CARIBOU HERD

WILDLIFE RESEARCH PERMIT NUMBER WL

Summary of discussion

Agriculture Zone Winter Replicate Count 2007/08

Nalcor Energy Lower Churchill Project, Environmental Effects Monitoring Program 2017 Red Wine Mountains Herd (RWMH) Caribou

ANNUAL REPORT

POPULATION INVENTORY OF THE AISHIHIK WOOD BISON (BISON BISON ATHABASCAE) HERD IN SOUTHWESTERN YUKON 2014

Winter 2016 Hunting District 313 Elk survey (Gardiner to 6-Mile Creek) Date: Flight Duration: Weather/Survey Conditions: Survey Methods

2009 Stone s Sheep / Caribou Inventory - MU 7-52

MOOSE SURVEY WHITEHORSE SOUTH EARLY-WINTER 2010

2008 WMU 502 white tailed deer, mule deer, and moose

Wolverine Survey Plan for Upper Turnagain Arm and Kenai Mountains, Alaska

WOLF POPULATION SURVEY. Tetlin National Wildlife Refuge Game Management Unit 12, eastern Alaska

for New Hampshire s Moose

Aishihik and Kluane Northern Mountain Caribou Herds Census, 2009

Population survey of Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) on Banks Island, Northwest Territories, July 2010

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Application of a New Method for Monitoring Lake Trout Abundance in Yukon: Summer Profundal Index Netting (SPIN)

Wildlife Management Unit 528 Moose Survey, January 8 14, 2013.

AERIAL WILDLIFE SURVEY OF THE SAMBAA K E CANDIDATE PROTECTED AREA MARCH 2009

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

LAKE TROUT POPULATION ASSESSMENT SEKULMUN LAKE Prepared by: Lars Jessup and Nathan Millar

Observations of Wolf and Deer during the 2015 Moose Survey

MOOSE MOVEMENTS FROM EAR-TAG RETURNS. B. P. Saunders and J. C. Williamson. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Wildlife Branch

Population Ecology Yellowstone Elk by C. John Graves

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Movements and distribution of the Bathurst and Ahiak. barren-ground caribou herds Annual Report

WADE WEST INCENTIVE TAGS 2016 NDOW- REPORTING BIOLOGIST SCOTT ROBERTS

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

The Role and Economic Importance of Private Lands in Providing Habitat for Wyoming s Big Game

BUFFALO PEAKS ELK MANAGEMENT PLAN

2012 Wildlife Studies

Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Annual Performance Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July June IS 0 N

Saguache Mule Deer Herd Data Analysis Unit D-26 Game Management Units 68, 681 and 682 March 2008

2009 Aerial Moose Survey

BUFFALO PEAKS ELK MANAGEMENT PLAN EXTENSION

Mountain goat survey in the Shulaps Range, subzone 3-32C, Thompson region, British Columbia, July 2007

Questionnaire for Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Interviews on Boreal Caribou LONG VERSION

Survey Techniques For White-tailed Deer. Mickey Hellickson, PhD Orion Wildlife Management

CARIBOU TRACKING SURVEY IN THE PAULATUK AREA ASSOCIATED WITH THE DARNLEY BAY RESOURCES AEROMAGNETIC SURVEY, SEPTEMBER 1997 NICHOLAS C.

Moose Management in the Peace Region

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

ANGLER HARVEST SURVEY

2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST

COLLEGIATE RANGE ELK MANAGEMENT PLAN

oose Management Guidelines )uly 96

North Thompson Moose Distribution And Classification Surveys Winter 2005

Nalcor Energy Lower Churchill Project, Environmental Effects Monitoring Program 2017 Mealy Mountains Herd (MMH) Caribou

Population Parameters and Their Estimation. Uses of Survey Results. Population Terms. Why Estimate Population Parameters? Population Estimation Terms

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

Observations of Deer and Wolves during the 2017 Moose Survey

Wildlife Introduction

NEW HAMPSHIRE MOOSE UPDATE

Observations of Wolves and Deer during the 2016 Moose Survey

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

2008 Aerial Moose Survey. Mark S. Lenarz, Forest Wildlife Populations and Research Group

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Deer Management Unit 252

Northern Mountain Caribou Population Dynamics Peace River Region

WILDLIFE RESEARCH PERMIT APPLICATION MACKENZIE BISON POPULATION MONITORING

Management Unit 7-45 Moose Inventory: December 2006

BIGHORN SHEEP IN IDAHO

2010 Mountain Caribou Census CENTRAL SELKIRK MOUNTAINS

Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) on northwest Victoria Island, Northwest Territories

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

JC Mesa Ranch. Colorado - San Miguel County - Telluride

Deer Management Unit 255

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

Gray Wolf Prey Base Ecology in the North Fork Flathead River Drainage

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

contents 2004 Big Game Statistics

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.

OGILVIE AND PEEL RIVERS

Deer Management Unit 152

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

1. Indicate the number of employees and supervisors who will be working on the site. 5-10

Winter habitat-use pattern of elk, mule deer, and moose in southwestern Wyoming

Interagency Special Status/Sensitive Species Program FY2005 Inventory & Conservation Planning Status Report

Ecological Pyramids Adapted from The Nevada Outdoor School, The Playa Ecological Pyramids Lesson Plan

Kootenay (Region 4) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

THE DIET OF Lutra canadensis IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM

Transcription:

MOOSE SURVEY LITTLE SALMON AND MAGUNDY RIVERS LATE-WINTER 2007 Prepared by: Mark O'Donoghue February 2013

MOOSE SURVEY LITTLE SALMON AND MAGUNDY RIVERS LATE-WINTER 2007 Yukon Department of Environment Fish and Wildlife Branch TR-13-10 Acknowledgments Environment Yukon provided funding and staff for this survey. We thank Denny Dennison for safe, efficient flying in often difficult conditions. We also thank Clyde Blackjack, Howard Charlie, Fabian Sheldon, and Morris Skookum for providing their keen eyesight and knowledge of the area as observers on the aerial survey crews. 2013 Yukon Department of Environment Copies available from: Yukon Department of Environment Fish and Wildlife Branch, V-5A Box 2703, Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 Phone (867) 667-5721, Fax (867) 393-6263 Email: environmentyukon@gov.yk.ca Also available online at www.env.gov.yk.ca Suggested citation: O DONOGHUE, M. 2013. Moose Survey: Little Salmon and Magundy rivers, late winter 2007. Yukon Fish and Wildlife Branch Report TR-13-10. Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada.

Summary We conducted a late-winter survey of moose along the Little Salmon and Magundy rivers on 1-8 March 2007, using fixed-wing aircraft. The main purpose of this survey was to map the distribution and late-winter habitats of moose in this area. We flew over the entire survey area and spent about 0.66 minutes per km² searching for moose. We found a total of 114 moose, of which 99 were adults and 15 were calves. Moose were widely distributed across the survey area. Most were seen in willow-rich habitats in recently burned areas in the northwest part of the survey area, and relatively few were in the main Little Salmon and Magundy river valleys. The biggest concentration of moose was in the southern Tatchun Hills area which burned in a fire in 1998. About 13% of moose seen in the survey were calves. This may be negatively biased because of lower sightability of cows with calves, but it is about average compared to other late-winter surveys, so recruitment appears to have been average this year in this area. Little Salmon and Magundy Rivers Late-Winter Moose Survey- March 2007 i

Table of Contents Acknowledgments... Inside Cover Summary... i Table of Contents... ii List of Tables... ii List of Figures... ii Introduction... 1 Previous Surveys... 1 Community Involvement... 1 Study Area... 1 Methods... 2 Weather and Snow Conditions... 2 Results and Discussion... 6 Coverage... 6 Observations of Moose... 6 Distribution of Moose... 6 Ages and Sexes of Moose... 7 Identification of High and Low-Density Blocks... 7 Other Wildlife Sightings... 10 Conclusions and Recommendations... 10 Literature Cited... 11 List of Tables Table 1. Observations of moose during the March 2007 survey along the Little Salmon and Magundy Rivers.... 6 List of Figures Map 1. March 2007 Moose Survey Little Salmon-Magundy Rivers... 3 Map 2. Previous Moose Surveys Little Salmon-Magundy Rivers... 4 Map 3. Little Salmon-Magundy Rivers Fire History... 5 Map 4. Moose Observations Little Salmon-Magundy Rivers... 8 Map 5. Survey Block Stratification Little Salmon-Magundy Rivers... 9 Little Salmon and Magundy Rivers Late-Winter Moose Survey- March 2007 ii

Introduction This report summarises the results of the late-winter survey of moose along the Little Salmon and Magundy rivers (see Map 1), conducted 1-8 March 2007. The survey included parts of the Tatchun, Big Salmon, and Glenlyons/Lower Tay River Moose Management Units. The main purpose of the survey was to map the distribution and late-winter habitats of moose in this area. Previous Surveys Environment Yukon has not previously surveyed moose in most of the 2007 survey area. There have been 2 surveys in previous years in areas that overlapped with the northern part of this survey area (see Map 2). In November and December 2000, Environment Yukon and Selkirk First Nation conducted an early-winter survey of moose over a very large area up the Pelly and Macmillan rivers that included a small overlapping area south of Drury Lake (results in Environment Yukon 2003). We also conducted an early-winter census of moose in the Faro area in November 2004 which overlapped with the northeastern part of the 2007 survey area (results in Environment Yukon 2007). Community Involvement This survey was conducted largely because the riparian habitat along the Little Salmon and Magundy rivers was identified as regionally important moose habitat by residents of the Carmacks area during planning sessions for developing the Community-based Fish and Wildlife Management Plan for the Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation Traditional Territory, 2004-2009. Interest in mapping seasonally important habitats has also been expressed at annual Northern Tutchone May Gatherings. The river is an important hunting area for the Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation. Study Area The survey area was located to cover the Little Salmon and Magundy river valleys, east to about 7 km from Faro. North and south boundaries generally followed the height of land on either side of the 2 rivers. The survey area was about 2,322 km², and included parts of Game Management Subzones 4-14, 4-15, 4-42, 4-52, 8-02, 8-03, 8-05, 8-18, and 8-19 (see Map 1) The study area was centered on the Little Salmon and Magundy river valleys (including Little Salmon Lake), which are mostly vegetated with dense spruce forest with numerous sloughs and riparian willow flats. The terrain is mostly rolling hills and plateaus, dissected by numerous creeks, with high alpine peaks to the north and south of Little Salmon Lake and on the southern flanks of the Glenlyon Range. Most of the upland area is forest-covered with black and white spruce, lodgepole pine, aspen, and paper birch. Willows and dwarf birch are the main shrub species, and are especially dense along river and creek valleys and in recent burns. Little Salmon and Magundy Rivers Late-Winter Moose Survey- March 2007 1

There are open subalpine ridges at higher altitudes spread throughout most of the survey area. Most of the area is unburned, but there are several old and recent burns in the west and east (see Map 3), and these vary in quality as moose habitat. The largest fires were the 407 km² 1998 burn and the 443 km² 1969 burn in the western part of the survey area. Areas east of Little Salmon Lake burned back in the early 1950s. Methods We used a survey method called intensive stratification, which gives us good information about the distribution and areas of concentration of moose over the entire survey area. The technique involves the following steps: 1. The survey area is divided into uniform rectangular blocks 15-16 km² (2' latitude x 5' longitude) in size. 2. Observers in fixed-wing aircraft fly over all the blocks, making about 4 passes through each block and classifying (or stratifying ) them as having either high, medium, low, or very low expected moose abundance, based on local knowledge, number of moose seen, tracks, and habitat. This is the same as the stratification part of a full moose census survey, except that we cover the area at about four times the intensity (0.5 minutes per km²) to get more complete information. 3. We count and get a GPS location of each moose or group of moose we see. We classify all moose seen by age (adult or calf) when possible, but we do not put as much effort into this as we do during censuses when we are making estimates of population composition. Except for cows with calves, we do not try to determine the sexes of moose. Weather and Snow Conditions Weather conditions for this survey were generally good. Temperatures ranged from -43 C to -14 C. Skies were mostly clear at the beginning and end of the survey, and cloudy with some light snow on 4 days of flying. Winds were fairly light at 0-19 kph. Light conditions ranged from flat to bright and snow coverage was complete, so visibility was generally good for spotting moose. Visibility was limited by light snow on 2 days. Little Salmon and Magundy Rivers Late-Winter Moose Survey- March 2007 2

135' 0'0'W 134'0'0'W MAP 1 March 2007 Moose Survey Little Salmon-Magundy Rivers CJ CJ CJ D D 0 5 10 15 km I I I I 1:750,000 Tatchun Moose Management Unit Glenlyons/Lower Tay River 1 Moose Management Unit Big Salmon Moose Management Unit Moose Survey Area. '-, 135'0'0'W 134' 0'0'W

135' 0'0'W MAP 2 Previous Moose Surveys Little Salmon-Magundy Rivers 10 15 km 1:50 0,00 0 2007 Survey Area 2000 Survey Area 134' 0'0'W

MAP 3 Little Salmon-Magundy Rivers Fire History 10 15 km D Fire History Moose Survey Area - 1946-1 949-1950-1959-1960 -1 969 1970-1979 1980-1 989 1990-1 999

Results and Discussion Coverage It took us about 25.6 hours to count moose in the 144 blocks in the survey area, for a search intensity of 0.66 minutes per km². This is higher than our target search intensity of 0.5 minutes per km², and corresponded with flying through each block about 4 or 5 times and circling animals when needed to verify sightings. We needed an additional 9.0 hours to ferry to and from the survey area and fuel supplies in Carmacks and Faro. The time devoted to ferrying was about 26% of the total flight time. Observations of Moose We counted a total of 114 moose; 99 of them were adults and 15 were calves (see Table 1). We spent 1,538 minutes (25.6 hours) searching the survey blocks for moose, so we saw an average of 0.07 moose per minute of survey time. Distribution of Moose Moose were widely distributed in the survey area, but most observations were in the southern Tatchun Hills in the northwestern part of the survey area (see Map 4). Most moose were seen in habitats with abundant willows in the area burned in 1998 and, to a lesser extent, in 1969, and many were on hillsides in the burns. We saw relatively few moose in the denser forested habitats in the Little Salmon and Magundy river valleys. This could partially reflect differences in visibility of moose in the different habitats. Sightability of moose was undoubtedly better in the more open burned areas than in riparian forests, but we did not see evidence from tracks that we were missing any large concentrations of moose in the dense spruce along the rivers. Moose typically concentrate in river valleys in the central Yukon during winters of deep snow, moving down from their preferred earlywinter subalpine habitats when snow depths get too deep as the winter progresses (Fraser et al. 2001, O Donoghue 2005). Snowfall in the Carmacks area was average to above normal during the winter of 2006-2007 (Yukon Department of Environment 2007), but snow depths at nearby snow survey stations (Mount Berdoe and Rose Creek) ranged from 45 cm to 56 cm, which are lower than those that would negatively affect moose (above 70 cm; Peek 1997). Distribution of willows likely affected habitat use by moose in this area in late winter 2007 more than did snow depths. Table 1. Observations of moose during the March 2007 survey along the Little Salmon and Magundy Rivers. Number Observed Percentage of Moose Observed Adults 99 87 Calves 15 13 Little Salmon and Magundy Rivers Late-Winter Moose Survey- March 2007 6

Ages and Sexes of Moose We classified all of the moose we saw by age, but we cannot translate these directly into estimates of the composition of the moose population in the study area. Stratification surveys such as this are aimed mostly at determining the distribution of moose in the survey area. The data are valuable for mapping important habitats and also for dividing up the survey blocks covering the area into strata or categories of high and low expected densities of moose for future late-winter surveys. The observed proportions of moose of different ages that we saw were likely biased compared to those of the actual population. Previous surveys have shown that cow moose, particularly cows with calves, tend to space themselves away from other moose more than bulls do, so that there is a higher proportion of cows in low-density survey blocks than there is in highdensity blocks. Low-density blocks also typically have lower sightability, because forest canopies are, on average, denser. As a result of these differences in sightability, we likely miss seeing more cows and calves than we do bulls when we search over all habitats with the same intensity, so our observations will be biased. Census surveys, in which survey blocks are searched very intensively and counts are corrected for sightability, are more appropriate for estimating population composition than are intensive stratification surveys. The age classifications observed in this survey can be compared directly with the results from similar late-winter surveys in the future. Our observed composition index was 13% calves in the population. Although likely biased low, 13% calves is about average compared to the percentage found in late-winter surveys elsewhere in the Yukon (average of 12% calves observed), so it is likely that survival of calves to 10 months of age was average in this area during the last year. Identification of High and Low- Density Blocks We divided the survey blocks into 4 categories of expected moose density, for use in future late-winter surveys of the area. We classified 14 (10%) of the 144 survey blocks as high, 27 (19%) as medium, 47 (33%) as low, and 56 (39%) as very low expected abundance of moose (see Map 5), based on our observations from the air. Most of the blocks with higher expected numbers of moose were located in the 1998 and 1969 burns in the northwest, where we observed highest numbers of moose in this survey, and in the hilly habitat north and south of the Little Salmon and Magundy rivers. In deep-snow winters, the distribution of moose in the area may be more concentrated into the river valleys. Little Salmon and Magundy Rivers Late-Winter Moose Survey- March 2007 7

134'0'0"W ( ~ = MAP 4 Moose Observations Little Salmon-Magundy Rivers 10 IS km Moose Survey Area Unclassified Adults Cows with Calves 1-2 e 1 Ca lf 3-4 5-6

135'0'0'W.~ MAP 5 Survey Block Stratification Little Salmon-Magundy Rivers 10 15 km 1:50 0,000 E::J Moose Survey Area Expe cted Number of Moose Q m::] Low G::::J Medium Very Low 135' 0'0'W 134' 0'0'W

Other Wildlife Sightings In addition to the 114 moose we counted in our survey blocks, we also observed seven moose just outside the survey area boundary (mapped in Map 4). During the survey, we also recorded sightings of other notable observations of wildlife besides moose. We saw 13 groups of caribou in 2 concentrated areas. Eight groups, totalling 31 animals, were in spruce forest habitat along the Little Salmon River in the usual wintering range of the Tatchun caribou herd. Another 5 groups with 17 caribou were in spruce forest along the Magundy River at the eastern edge of the survey area; this is known winter range of the North Pelly Mountains caribou herd. We saw one group of 6 sheep on a peak just outside the southeast corner of the survey area. We saw 2 mule deer on the south-facing slopes to the north of Little Salmon village. We also observed 4 wolves in 2 groups along the Magundy River Conclusions and Recommendations Habitat with abundant willows in hilly terrain and recent burns supported the highest densities of moose in this area in late winter 2007. The 1998 burn in the southern Tatchun Hills had the largest concentration of moose in the area. Snow depths were above normal in this area this winter but still well below those at which we would expect movements of moose to be negatively affected. Local knowledge indicates that moose in this area typically concentrate more in the larger river valleys during winters with deep snow. Recruitment of moose appears to have been average in this area during the past year. Given the interest in this area for agricultural and residential development, we should map distribution of moose during a winter with deep snow depths to document key late-winter habitats. Little Salmon and Magundy Rivers Late-Winter Moose Survey- March 2007 10

Literature Cited ENVIRONMENT YUKON. 2003. 2000 Pelly River Area Moose Survey Summary. Yukon Fish and Wildlife Branch Report SR-03-02, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. ENVIRONMENT YUKON. 2007. 2004 Faro area moose survey results, population status, and harvest. Yukon Fish and Wildlife Branch Report SR-07-02, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. FRASER, V., M. O DONOGHUE, AND S. WESTOVER. 2001. Mayo Moose Management Unit. Summary of late-winter 2001 moose survey Yukon Fish and Wildlife Branch Report SR-01-01, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada O DONOGHUE, M. 2005. Late winter habitat use by moose: Survey of the Pelly and Macmillan river areas March 2001. Yukon Fish and Wildlife Branch Report SR- 05-01, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. PEEK, J. M. 1997. Habitat relationships. Pages 351-376 in A. W. Franzmann and C. C. Schwartz, editors, Ecology and management of the North American moose; Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C. YUKON DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT. 2007. Yukon snow survey bulletin and water supply forecast. March 1, 2007. Yukon Water Resources Branch. Little Salmon and Magundy Rivers Late-Winter Moose Survey- March 2007 11