DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

Similar documents
DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 249

Deer Management Unit 122

DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

Deer Management Unit 152

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

DMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 255

021 Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 252

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 127

Deer Management Unit 349

DMU 419 Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia, and Shiawassee Counties

DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

DMU 038 Jackson County

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

2012 MICHIGAN DEER HUNTING: STATUS AND PROSPECTS

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. Sand Plain Big Woods Goal Block

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Chronic Wasting Disease in Southeast Minnesota. Drs. Michelle Carstensen and Lou Cornicelli Preston Public Meeting December 18, 2018

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

ARE WHITE-TAILED DEER VERMIN?

WORKING WITH COMMUNITIES AND INTEREST GROUPS

Street Edmonton, AB T6K 1T8. Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA) Position On Game Farming In Alberta February 2004

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST

City of Galena 2017 Deer Hunting Survey

Farm Wildlife Management and Food Plots

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report. Primary ACA staff on project: Stefanie Fenson, Jeff Forsyth and Jon Van Dijk

Big Game Season Structure, Background and Context

Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association

BIG GAME SEASON STRUCTURE

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

Deer Management in Maryland -Overview. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader

MANAGED LANDS DEER PERMITS WHITE-TAILED DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION General Information

Deer Management in Maryland. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Maryland DNR

New Changes to the Managed Lands Deer Program (MLDP)

EXHIBIT C. Chronic Wasting Disease

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

THIEF LAKE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA NEWSLETTER

MANAGED LANDS DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION. General Requirements

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

Kansas Deer Report Seasons

Herd Reduction. Background.

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Deer Hunting Frequently Asked Questions 2017 Deer Hunting Rules September 22, 2017

NORTH TABLELANDS DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN

MOLESWORTH BOVINE TB CONTROL OPERATION (YEAR 1)

Concerns About Baiting and Feeding Game Wildlife

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47

ARIKAREE DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN

Recommendations for Elimination of Bovine Tuberculosis in Free-Ranging White-Tailed Deer in Michigan

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Winter 2016 Hunting District 313 Elk survey (Gardiner to 6-Mile Creek) Date: Flight Duration: Weather/Survey Conditions: Survey Methods

DEER MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM LANDOWNER/LESSEE APPLICATION

Dynamics of Bovine Tuberculosis in Wild White- Tailed Deer in Michigan

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

FIVE YEAR BIG GAME SEASON STRUCTURE DRAFT DATES FOR

FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY, WISCONSIN WHITE-TAILED DEER TRUSTEE AND REVIEW COMMITTEE JUNE, 2012

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT May 25, 2011

2008 MICHIGAN DEER HUNTING PROSPECTS

NOW THERFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF BRIDGEPORT, WEST VIRGINIA:

1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

CWD 102 for Managers. Chronic Wasting Disease - the beginnings Colorado Univ. of Wyoming

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

Early History, Prehistory

2009 WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer

Minnesota White-tailed Deer Management Plan

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

Hunting for Sustainability Conservation and local, free-range protein. Keith Warnke WDNR

CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE

WILD HOGS IN MISSISSIPPI

Summary report on all harvested species on Patuxent Research Refuge from September 1 - January 31, 2017 Deer Harvest

Minnesota Deer Population Goal Setting Team Information Packet Superior Uplands Arrowhead Goal Block 2015

MANAGING BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS IN WHITE-TAILED DEER IN NORTHWESTERN MINNESOTA: A 2007 PROGRESS REPORT

Transcription:

DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit Area Description The Core TB Zone Deer Management Unit is in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP) and covers portions of Alcona, Alpena, Montmorency, and Oscoda Counties. It is approximately 570 square miles of which about 7% of the total acreage is public land. The remainder of land is in private ownership. Topography varies from rolling hills to areas that are relatively flat. Soil types range from sandy types that are well drained to poorly drained muck. The landscape consists primarily of large private hunt clubs managed for deer hunting with interspersed agricultural lands and blocks of public land, especially in the eastern part of the unit. The large hunt clubs are dominated by forest land and provide excellent habitat for deer. Some forested habitat has been negatively impacted by high deer numbers and historic use for cattle pasture. The agricultural lands are used for pasture and row crops. Management Guidance One goal guides the deer management in this DMU: bovine tuberculosis (btb) eradication. Tuberculosis surveillance in deer continues to be an important activity in this unit, which is the core bovine tuberculosis (btb) area where 78% of the btb positive deer in Michigan have been found (Figure 1). Because there has been little change in btb prevalence in deer in recent years (Figure 2), it will be important to maintain a management program that keeps deer numbers low to minimize btb transmission with the ultimate goal of eradication. Enforcement of the ban on baiting and feeding should continue, as high deer concentrations caused by these activities increase btb transmission. Sustained antlerless harvest should occur to keep deer populations from expanding. Deer populations and densities that can occur in this DMU increase btb transmission and antlerless harvest reduces the risk of transmission by lowering deer populations and densities. Other tools aimed at increasing deer harvest include an early and late antlerless deer season as well as liberal use of Disease Control Permits, Deer Damage Permits and Deer Management Assistance Permits in the DMU.

Figure 1. Bovine Tuberculosis survey results in Michigan. Figure 2. Bovine Tuberculosis prevalence in deer within DMU 452

Population Assessment Factors Deer Harvest Analysis Recreational antlerless deer harvest has exceeded or met antlered deer (buck) harvest since 2010 although in recent years, antlerless harvest has dropped below buck harvest (Figure 3). Regardless of the recent decline, the harvest trend shows a general willingness among hunters to take antlerless deer. Liberalized antlerless regulations since 2010 (e.g., antlerless deer are legal to take on any kill tag in the DMU) seem to have less of an impact in this DMU than surrounding Units. Regardless, this regulation should continue as an additional tool encouraging hunters to take antlerless deer. As discussed above, increased antlerless harvest reduces deer populations and densities, thereby reducing the potential for btb transmission. Figure 3. Recreational antlerless and antlered deer harvest in DMU 452. Disease Control Permits In 2008 the DNR increased the number of Disease Control Permits (DCPs) available to farmers and landowners near btb infected farms in an effort to reduce deer and cattle interactions. Over the following years, participation in the program has varied. Regardless of availability, the number of deer taken on DCPs has remained at a low level compared with the number of tags available to fill, and has little to no lasting impact on the size of the overall herd. The success in this program is that cattle farmers are provided with a tool to address deer coming in with cattle or cattle feed sources, thereby reducing their risk of contracting btb. This program should continue to be available to farmers that desire to protect their cattle in this manner.

Deer Management Recommendations In the ongoing effort to control btb in deer, and given that DMU 452 is a multi-county DMU created to address btb in the NLP, it is recommended that public and private land antlerless availability remain liberal in this DMU. Encouraging the harvest of deer in this unit remains very important for btb management. This means offering effectively unlimited antlerless licenses, maintaining a feeding and baiting ban, and offering DCPs to those willing to use them. A late and early antlerless season on private land should also be maintained to provide additional opportunity to harvest antlerless deer.

Figure 4 DMU 452 Cover Type