How Running Barefoot (Xero Shoes) and Running Shod (Montrail Shoes) Effects Percent of Maximum Heart rate - A Case Report

Similar documents
How Running Barefoot (Xero Shoes) and Running Shod (Montrail Shoes) Effects Percent of Maximum Heart rate - A Case Report

Journal of Human Sport and Exercise E-ISSN: Universidad de Alicante España

The running economy difference between running barefoot and running shod

25K Run Training Schedule

HHS Public Access Author manuscript Int J Cardiol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 April 15.

JEPonline Journal of Exercise Physiologyonline

Anaerobic and aerobic contributions to 800 m and 8 km season bests

SQUASH CANADA TECHNICAL AND FITNESS TESTING PROTOCOL MANUAL

Plan on Changing Your Footstrike? Not So Fast

The Effect of Training in Minimalist Running Shoes on Running Economy

Changes in a Top-Level Soccer Referee s Training, Match Activities, and Physiology Over an 8-Year Period: A Case Study

Editor s Report on Volume 84, 2013

Using Hexoskin Wearable Technology to Obtain Body Metrics During Trail Hiking

A Description of Variability of Pacing in Marathon Distance Running

Does wearing a wrist guard affect the site of wrist fracture in snow sports?

COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF AEROBIC POWER VALUE DERIVED FROM DIFFERENT MAXIMUM OXYGEN CONSUMPTION TESTING METHODS

Journal of Exercise Physiologyonline

Validation of a Step Test in Children Ages 7-11

Progression 1

Assessment of an International Breaststroke Swimmer Using a Race Readiness Test

Talent ID and Development Camps

LJMU Research Online

Volume 37, Issue 3. Elite marathon runners: do East Africans utilize different strategies than the rest of the world?

Current General Information First Name: Last Name: Date:

Physiological Assessment: Summary Report 11 December 2011

The impact of freediving on psychomotor performance and blood catecholamine concentration

Lactate Tolerance, Aerobic Power, or Running Economy? Which Factor Really Decides the Mile? USTFCCCA Annual Meeting Orlando 2013

The Medical Legacy Of George Herman Babe Ruth

Assessment of Guide Reporting & Preliminary Results of Lion Monitoring

Foot Biomechanics Getting Back to the Base

GORE-TEX Transalpine-Run Training Plan for Novice Runners

Presented to the ASMFC Horseshoe Crab Management Board October 17, 2017

Running Injuries in Adolescents Jeffrey Shilt, M.D. Part 1 Page 1

Effectiveness of a Paramedic Assistant on Enrolment Rates for Prehospital Research Studies

Languages. Heart rate. Vo2

Bicycle Crashes. Number of Bike Crashes. Total Bike Crashes. are down 21% and severe bike crashes down 8% since 2013 (5 years).

Arch Height and Running Shoes: The Best Advice to Give Patients

VALIDITY OF SELECTED CARDIOVASCULAR FIELD-BASED TEST AMONG MALAYSIAN HEALTHY FEMALE ADULT. S. H. Azmi 1,*, and N. Sulaiman 2

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

5. Golf Industry Trends and Developments in the US 6. The US Macro Economy Factors and Impact over Golf Industry

Fitness Assessment Form

DIFFERENCES IN PHYSICAL FITNESS IN KUMITE AND KATA PERFORMANCE BETWEEN FEMALE KARATE ATHLETES

Regional Economic Conditions

Article published in: ACSM s Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise Vol. 27, No. 4, April 1995

THE INFLUENCE OF SLOW RECOVERY INSOLE ON PLANTAR PRESSURE AND CONTACT AREA DURING WALKING

2013 ING New York City Marathon Request to Join The Bone Marrow Foundation Team

2/3/2014. The Distance Plan that Changed the Chargers!

University of Canberra. This thesis is available in print format from the University of Canberra Library.

Fatigue Determines Endurance Performance: The Training Application

Monitoring of performance an training in rowers

The Effect of a Barefoot Running Training Program on Running Economy and Performance

The Case for Roundabouts:

Can Asymmetric Running Patterns Be Predicted By Assessment of Asymmetric Standing Posture? A Case Study in Elite College Runners

PHYSICAL EDUCATION STUDIES

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 11 AT 4 PM

RUTGERS FOOTBALL MAJORITY SAY IT CAN IMPROVE STATE IMAGE WANT BIG TIME FOOTBALL

The Effects of Using Starting Blocks on Short Distance Sprints

Journal of Exercise Physiologyonline

IV. Basic Procedures for Human Research Protections

CYCLING & HEALTH. Randy Rzewnicki, PhD, Brussels, September 2013

A Re-Examination of Running Energetics in Average and Elite Distance Runners

TRAINING WITH! PHYSICLO RESISTANCE GEAR. Testing & Validation

Global Containerboard Outlook

windnavigator Site Analyst Report

Land Values and Chinese Agriculture

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR S ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES

12. Laboratory testing

KICKBALL RULES: INTRAMURAL SPORTS

HRR Tuesday Intervals Training Plan Sep-Dec 2014

Usain Bolt He is fast! In fact the fastest, but just how fast is fast?

Heart rate response to a climber s fall in sport climbing

WRITING FOR PUBLICATION

Martin Rush Serpentine AC Marathon and Eng land Runnin A g thletic talk

Evaluating the Influence of R3 Treatments on Fishing License Sales in Pennsylvania

John Stanton s ARMY RUN TRAINING GUIDE ADVANCED HALF MARATHON PROGRAM

SUMMARY REPORT Q1/2015

The effect of the Gravity-Loading Countermeasure Skinsuit (GLCS) upon aerobic exercise performance

Chapter I examines the anthropometric and physiological factors that. determine success in sport. More specifically it discusses the somatotype

John Stanton s ARMY RUN TRAINING GUIDE INTERMEDIATE HALF MARATHON PROGRAM

Comparison of the 1.5 Mile Run Times at 7,200 Feet and Simulated 850 Feet in a Hyperoxic Room.

C A T H O L I C Y O U T H C O A L I I T I O N K I C K B A L L T O U R N A M E N T

Steeplechase Hurdle Economy, Mechanics, and Performance

ALTITUDE TRAINING FOR IMPROVING SWIMMING PERFORMANCE AT SEA LEVEL. MITSUMASA MIYASHITA, YOSHITERU MUTOH and YOSHIHARU YAMAMOTO.

THE PHYSICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL VALUE OF 5-A-SIDE SOCCER TRAINING TO

Advanced Topics in the Mile

Walk - Run Activity --An S and P Wave Travel Time Simulation ( S minus P Earthquake Location Method)

3. EXCEL FORMULAS & TABLES

DORFAM. Division of Research Department of Family Practice Texas A&M University System HSC College of Medicine Scott & White Memorial Hospital

Beyond Bullet Points: Statistics, Trends and Analysis

Babson Capital/UNC Charlotte Economic Forecast. May 13, 2014

REGIONAL SQUADS PROGRAMME SELECTION POLICY & STANDARDS 2019

27 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Natural Running: The Simple Path To Stronger, Healthier Running By Danny Abshire, Brian Metzler

July 2015 Sept Cork City Pedestrian Counter Report

John Stanton s ARMY RUN TRAINING GUIDE BEGINNER HALF MARATHON PROGRAM

Wisconsin 511 Traveler Information Annual Usage Summary January 3, Wisconsin 511 Phone Usage ( )

Overview of the Regional Economy

Miles To Go Before I Sleep How Much Mileage Is Enough? By Jason R. Karp, M.S.

Farm Energy IQ. Farms Today Securing Our Energy Future. Wind Energy on Farms

Transcription:

Article ID: WMC004123 ISSN 2046-1690 How Running Barefoot (Xero Shoes) and Running Shod (Montrail Shoes) Effects Percent of Maximum Heart rate - A Case Report Corresponding Author: Dr. Bill Misner, Dr., PhD, American Holistic College of Nutrition PhD Emeritus/Retired, 1140 West Glass Avenue, Spokane, Wa. 99205 USA, 99205 - United States of America Submitting Author: Dr. Bill Misner, Dr., PhD, American Holistic College of Nutrition PhD Emeritus/Retired, 1140 West Glass Avenue, Spokane, Wa. 99205 USA, 99205 - United States of America Article ID: WMC004123 Article Type: Case Report Submitted on:10-mar-2013, 03:01:58 AM GMT Article URL: http://www.webmedcentral.com/article_view/4123 Subject Categories:SPORTS MEDICINE Published on: 11-Mar-2013, 01:10:57 PM GMT Keywords:Exercise, Performance Running, Maximum Heart Rate, Running Barefoot, Running Shod [shoes] How to cite the article:misner B. How Running Barefoot (Xero Shoes) and Running Shod (Montrail Shoes) Effects Percent of Maximum Heart rate - A Case Report. WebmedCentral SPORTS MEDICINE 2013;4(3):WMC004123 Copyright: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Source(s) of Funding: The author bore all costs for collecting the data in this single subject case report. Furthermore the author declares appreciation to (1) Steve Sashen, CEO Xero Shoes, Feel The World, Inc., 5470 Conestoga Ct., Boulder, CO 80301, 1-800-499-8880, and, (2) Byron Pittam, Montrail Shoes/Mountain Hardwear Inc.1414 Harbour Way S #1005, Richmond, CA 94804, (510) 558-3000 for their generous contribution of Xero Shoes and Montrail Rogue Racer Shoes for this case study. Competing Interests: The author was also the subject in this case study and acknowledges all the data collected was associated with his heart rate value, and, may or may not, reflect consistent trends in whole runner populations. The author reports no competing interests and received no financial remuneration from either shoe company. WebmedCentral > Case Report Page 1 of 10

How Running Barefoot (Xero Shoes) and Running Shod (Montrail Shoes) Effects Percent of Maximum Heart rate - A Case Report Author(s): Misner B Abstract Heart Rate [HR] is a factor effecting running performance. The type of a running shoe may enhance or inhibit performance depending upon the type of contact surface, the weight of the shoe, or the form employed. There are arguments for and against running barefoot as compared to Shod Shoe in a lightweight running shoe. The trend observed in this case study raises a question as to whether application in greater populations has merit. This single subject case study shows a 4-8% advantage running at 70-89% maximum heart rate in lightweight running shoes. However, single subject case study is numerically limited requiring more research on subjects representing all genders, ages, and fitness levels to determine if there are any maximal heart rate differences between running barefoot in minimalist shoes and lightweight racing shoes. Methods Three shoes [pictures below] were selected: Two barefoot models[xero 4mm, Xero 6mm] and a non-barefoot, lightweight shoe {Montrail Rogue Racer]. A fit 73-year male subject ran at three different speeds [5.2-mph, 7.0-mph, and 9.0-mph] on a treadmill, alternating one of three shoes; two were barefoot models [Xero 4-mm, Xero 6-mm]; the other was a non-barefoot model, a Montrail Rogue Racer shoe. A protocol consisting of 9-separate tests was repeated every 48-hours for three test days. The subject was required to warm-up jogging for 10-minutes prior to the first of 3-tests for 5-minutes at 5.2-mph in each shoe. The subject took a 5-minute rest break in between each shoe test. This protocol was repeated again for 2-minutes at 7.0-mph, and for 1-minute at 9.0-mph to determine this subject s heart rate response to running each speed in each model. Heart rates were recorded using a wrist cuff blood-pressure monitor after each running test alternating each shoe model. The Percents of this subject s Maximum Heart Rate were calculated [1, 2] and recorded after each test [the order of each shoe was alternated and is listed in brackets] shown below in Table 1.Data and Figure 1.Shoe Effects Percents Maximum Heart Rate. Discussion Research states that running economy is higher barefoot than running in shoes. By example, Warne & Warrington (3) reported that running barefoot significantly improves running economy when compared with Shod Shoe running. Also, Hanson et al., (4) reported that at 70% of VO 2 max pace barefoot running is more economical, and that running requires a significantly higher heart rate and VO 2 value. However, this single subject case study, reports the opposite, that running economy based on percent of maximum heart rates significantly favored the Shod Shoe lightweight Montrail running shoe, not in either of the barefoot models (Xero 4mm and Xero 6mm). This contradicting case study simply raises a critical question: Is running economy in lightweight shoes superior to barefoot running in larger populations in male and female runners of all ages? Conclusion This subject ran -8% and -4% lower percent maximum heart rate average at 7.0-mph and 9.0-mph running consistently in lightweight Montrail shoes compared to both barefoot models [Xero 4mm, Xero 6mm]. This single subject s running at above 70% maximum heart rate appear to have benefited by running in lightweight Montrail shoes, not from either barefoot models [Xero 4mm, Xero 6mm]. References 1.The American College of Sports Medicine states the following formula for determining Maximum Heart Rate formula is: 220 Age = (MHR). The Heart Rate Debate Jan 13, 2012, Linda Melone, ACSM Certified Personal TrainerSM. http://www.acsm.org/access-public-information/articles /2012/01/13/the-heart 2.Fitness > Calculators > Target Heart Rate Calculator WebmedCentral > Case Report Page 2 of 10

was used to determine the percents of 100% maximum heart rate for a 73-year subject was 220-73 = 147-bpm. http://www.active.com/fitness/calculators/heartrate# 3. Warne JP, Warrington GD. Four-week habituation to simulated barefoot running improves running economy when compared with shod running. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012 Dec 17. doi: 10.1111/sms.12032. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 23252417. 4. Hanson NJ, Berg K, Deka P, Meendering JR, Ryan C. Oxygen cost of running barefoot vs. running shod. Int J Sports Med. 2011 Jun;32(6):401-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1265203. Epub 2011 Apr 6. PubMed PMID: 21472628. WebmedCentral > Case Report Page 3 of 10

Illustrations Illustration 1 Figure 1. Shoe Effects On Percents of Maximum Heart Rate WebmedCentral > Case Report Page 4 of 10

Illustration 2 Table 1: Heart rate response to each shoe AT THREE RUNNING SPEEDS 3-TESTS [73-YR MALE] Test #1, #2, #3 Xero 4mm Xero 6mm Montrail Rogue Racer 8.33 oz Bracket numbers [1-2-3] indicate order shoe was tested Shoe order was rotated in all 3-tests. 3.67 oz 5.97 oz Base Resting Heart Rate 56 Base Resting Heart Rate 56 Base Resting Heart Rate 56 Day # Treadmill Speed-mph-time Heart Rate Heart Rate Heart Rate [Shoe order] [Shoe order] [Shoe order] #1-Speed 5.2-mph 80 81 88 5-minutes #2-Speed 5.2-mph 88 87 87 5-minutes WebmedCentral > Case Report Page 5 of 10

#3-Speed 5.2-mph 96 92 89 5-minutes #1-Speed 7.0-mph 103 105 104 2-minutes #2-Speed 7.0-mph 110 108 92 2-minutes #3-Speed 7.0-mph 118 108 97 2-minutes #1-Speed 9.0-mph 129 134 122 1-minute #2-Speed 9.0-mph 132 127 122 1-minute WebmedCentral > Case Report Page 6 of 10

#3-Speed 9.0-mph 132 122 129 1-minute 5.2-MPH 5-MINUTES 88 BPM 86.6 BPM 88 BPM AVERAGE HEART RATE [BPM] %-MAXIMUM HEART RATE 60% 59% 60% 7.0-MPH 2-MINUTES 110.30 BPM 107.00 BPM 97.60 BPM AVERAGE HEART RATE [BPM] %-MAXIMUM HEART RATE 75% 73% 67% 9.0-MPH 1-MINUTE 131.00 BPM 127.60 BPM 124.30 BPM AVERAGE HEART RATE [BPM] %-MAXIMUM HEART RATE 89% 87% 85% WebmedCentral > Case Report Page 7 of 10

AVERAGE HEART RATE 109.76 BPM 107.06 BPM 103.30 BPM ALL SPEEDS [BPM] %-MAXIMUM HEART RATE 74.6% 73% 70.6% Within the format using the same treadmill pre-set at for 5-minutes at 5.2-mph, 2-minutes at 7.0-mph, and 1-minute at 9.0-mph, each shoe was rotated [order shown in brackets above]. Rotation of each model eliminates elevated heart rate with a 5-minute rest between each test. The average heart rate for all and each of the three running speeds determines which model compliments heart rate performance in this single subject case study. WebmedCentral > Case Report Page 8 of 10

Illustration 3 Shoes Picture WebmedCentral > Case Report Page 9 of 10

Disclaimer This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party. Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website. WebmedCentral > Case Report Page 10 of 10