Utah Extension IPM and Sustainable Agriculture Mini Grant Program

Similar documents
Using IPM to Manage Ground Squirrels

Burrowing Rodent Management

Managing Burrowing Mammals

THE RICHARDSON GROUND SQUIRREL ITS BIOLOGY AND CONTROL MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BOX HELENA MT

Pesticide Applicator Training

Control of Pocket Gophers and Ground Squirrels

A NEW ERADICATION STRATEGY FOR SMALL, REMOTE GYPSY MOTH INFESTATIONS

Managing Vertebrate Pests

Wildlife in the Urban Interface. Jeff Schalau Agent, Agriculture & Natural Resources University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yavapai County

STUDY GUIDE A Guide to California Ground Squirrels Identification, Biology and Control Methods

Unit PM 2.1 Vertebrate Pest Management Specimen Paper

Vertebrate Pest Management for Grapes

IPM Credentials Why am I here talking about IPM and wildlife control?

Navel orangeworm biology, monitoring, and management

KILLS RATS, MICE, AND GOPHERS KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION

Understanding Today s Environmental Issues and the Oregon Stewardship Guidelines. David Phipps GCSAA NW Field Staff

Vertebrate Pests of Rice

Targeted Wild Pig Feeder by WPF, Inc.

Complete Cockroach Control Protecting Reputations, Health Ratings, and Profitability

2017 Turfgrass Proceedings

An Overview of Recent Ground Squirrel Bait Registration Research Supported By the California Bait Surcharge Program

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L LCCMR Work Plan

Vertebrate Pest Management in Pistachio Orchards. Julie Finzel Livestock and Natural Resources Farm Advisor Kern, Tulare, and Kings Counties

Christmas Tree Newsletter

SUBJ: Supporting document for March PWC staff mountain lion presentation

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council SUBJECT: 2008 REPORT FROM THE TEHAMA COUNTY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT

California Agriculture 2001: Trends and Issues

Full Spectrum Deer Management Services

Integrated Pest Management: Application in the Sea Lamprey Control Program

Deer Management Unit 252

Comparison of Two Yellow Sticky Traps for Capture of Western Cherry Fruit Fly (Rhagoletis indifferens) in Tart Cherry in Northern Utah 2015

2011 RUTGERS TURFGRASS RESEARCH FIELD DAYS

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

CONTROL OF GROUND SQUIRRELS IN CALIFORNIA USING ANTICOAGULANT TREATED BAITS

2014 EVALUATION OF HOUSE FLY DEMONSTRATION. COOPERATORS: James Colby Moreland and Jody & Robin Thomas

2000 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

V E R T E B R A T E P E S T C O N T R O L H A N D B O O K - M A M M A L S

CHEETAH PROJECT Cheetah Conservation Fund. Interviewers name Date

Results of a Two-Year Pink Bollworm Survey in the Southern Plains of Texas and New Mexico

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

Vertebrate Control Products and Potential Hazards

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

Monitoring Methods for Codling Moth Dr. Jay Brunner, WSU TFREC, Wenatchee

Ground Squirrel Management

GYPSY MOTH (LYMANTRIA DISPAR) TRAPPING & TREATMENTS IN MINNESOTA 2012 UPDATE

USDA APHIS WILDLIFE SERVICES ACTIVITIES SUMMARY REPORT 2013 WHITE-TAILED DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TOWNSHIP OF UPPER ST. CLAIR (September 2013)

Managing Richardson s Ground Squirrels

Annex 1 to ISPM No. 26 (ESTABLISHMENT OF PEST FREE AREAS FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE)) Fruit fly trapping (200-) Steward: Walther Enkerlin

Is Ground Rolling For You? Jodi DeJong-Hughes Regional Extension Educator, Marshall cell

Livestock Concerns with Feral Hogs. Aaron Sumrall Newton Co. Extension Agent

BURROWING RODENTS GROUND SQUIRRELS SANTA CLARA COUNTY AGRICULTURAL OFFICE

Policy Statement. Page 2 of 5

Biologist s Answer: What are your goals? Deer Management. Define goals, objectives. Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes?

Developing an Easily Used Bait Monitoring Method for Oriental Fruit Moth in Mating Disruption Orchards

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

City of Galena 2017 Deer Hunting Survey

Syllabus. CRRU-IASIS Wildlife Aware Course. for. Professional Pest Control Technicians / Operatives

ORGANIC INSECT MANAGEMENT AT THE VINEYARD GOLF CLUB

Montana Rancher Record Notebook

Deer Management Unit 152

Where now for slug control without Draza?

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Dear Volunteer: Sincerely, Anne Coles. President, Alberta Trappers Association. RFMA Log Book- Trapping Season 2017/18 Page 1

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

School Ground Invasion by Voles

Howell Woods Orientation and Safety Open Book Test

Figure 1. A) Sam Malan watches wasp choice test. B) Y-tube apparatus example.

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

IPM Fun with Insects, Weeds and the Environment. Lesson #2 Insect IPM. The New York State Integrated Pest Management Program

FERALS IN THE CLASSROOM. Designed by the Institute for Applied Ecology University of Canberra Invasive Animals CRC

Ground squirrels feed on crops and ornamentals. They cause damage by burrowing and they also chew on drip tubing and wiring. There is more than one ty

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

April Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

Deer Management Unit 122

Isolation of the rapid blight pathogen Labyrinthula terrestris from Bermudagrasses in Arizona

BRIEFING on IBERIAN LYNX (Lynx pardinus) MANAGEMENT PLAN AT DOÑANA NATIONAL PARK

Managing Richardson s Ground Squirrels

Michigan State University participates in the

IPM Fun with Insects, Weeds and the Environment. Lesson #2 Insect IPM. The New York State Integrated Pest Management Program

Result Demonstration Report

SP-472 AUGUST Feral Hog Population Growth, Density and Harvest in Texas

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book

USDA-ARS Areawide Tick IPM Project: Host-targeted Control

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

NEW BRUNSWICK FURBEARER HARVEST REPORT

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Deer and Deer Management in Central New York: Local Residents Interests and Concerns

Exclusion: the Future of Pest Management

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

VERTEBRATE PESTS OF ALFALFA. Terrell p, Salmon

Fish Farming in Arizona: Double Duty From Irrigation Water

DMU 038 Jackson County

Prionus Mating Disruption and Trap Capture in Sweet Cherry 2011

ARKANSAS GAME AND FISH COMMISSION STRATEGIC SQUIRREL MANAGEMENT PLAN

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Groton Open Space Association s AVERY FARM EXPLORER GUIDEBOOK

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Transcription:

Utah Extension IPM and Sustainable Agriculture Mini Grant Program Title: Comparing Different Methods of Controlling Townsend s Ground Squirrels in Irrigated Crop Ground Project Personnel: Mark Nelson (Project Leader). Nicki Frey (Project Co-leader) Cooperators: Mark Whitney, Beaver County Commissioner; Tammy Pearson, Beaver County Commissioner, Arlan Mayer, SCD Chairman; Keith James, grower. Justification: Townsend s ground squirrel s (Spermophilius townsendi) populations on agricultural lands in Beaver County, Utah are increasing. Hundreds of acres of alfalfa ground in western Beaver County are currently infested with the ground squirrel. High populations of ground squirrels can compete with livestock for forage; destroy food crops, golf courses, and lawns; and can be reservoirs for diseases such as plague. Their burrowing activities alter irrigation systems. Burrow mounds not only cover and kill vegetation, but can damage haying machinery. Since 2009, we ve implemented a population control program that consisted of prebaiting and then baiting with Zinc Phosphide (Nelsen et al. 2012). For the first several years this baiting program helped reduce the number of squirrels; however, in the past 2 years the squirrel numbers have significantly increased. Ground squirrels hibernate during the coldest part of the winter. Males usually become active above ground 1 to 2 weeks before the females in the spring, sometimes as early as late February or early March. Breeding occurs immediately after hibernation and the young are born after a 4-to 5-week gestation period. Generally, only one litter of 2 to 10 young is produced each year. Densities of the ground squirrel populations can range from 2 to 20 or more per acre. At this density it is difficult for a farmer to obtain a profit from the harvest, due to the amount of damage incurred to the property and crop. Our current control programs targets the ground squirrels from when they first come out of hibernation, before they start breeding, usually starting in the middle of February and lasts till the alfalfa greens up around the middle of March. This is only a 30-day - or less - window of control. Sometimes, due to snow or cold temperatures, this window of application might only last 2-3 weeks. Unfortunately, it appears our current method is not flexible in order to coincide with the biological activity of ground squirrels each spring. In an effort to reduce ground squirrel populations, some farmers have suggested baiting ground squirrels at a bait station through May 31. This would work to control males, females, and new offspring each spring. Additionally, some farmers have also tried trapping squirrels in addition to our implemented baiting program. We would like to compare several different types of traps to baiting and prebaiting programs, to determine the most effective method and the best timing for each strategy. Additionally, we would like to train farmers to effectively use a successful combination

of methods such that the community of farmers collaborates to control ground squirrel populations across the landscape. A collaborative, systematic control strategy would be more effective at decreasing the population of ground squirrels in the landscape and decrease the overall individual effort needed from each farmer from year to year. Objectives 1. To train Beaver County farmers impacted by ground squirrels about integrated pest management approaches to Townsend Ground Squirrels in irrigated crop ground. 2. To compare the effectiveness of different rodenticides registered in Utah and traps in field trials to control ground squirrels. 3. To determine a best management practice for controlling ground squirrels in Beaver county and train a collaborative community of farmers in Beaver County to implement these practices. Procedures At our Beaver County Crop School held the end of January 2015, I will inform the farmers of the research we are planning on conducting on the ground squirrels and find farmers who would like to take part in the study. These field trials will be conducted in cooperation with local alfalfa producers in Beaver County. Field trials will consist of the following treatment types: control, 2 types of lethal traps, bait station, and current prebait/bait method. Ground squirrels home range is generally < 70 meters in diameter. Thus we will locate our treatments within a field such that an entire colony is encompassed in one treatment. Depending on the size of the field, we will randomly assign a combination of at least 2 treatments to each field, up to a total of 5 treatments. Each treatment will be distributed over 0.5 acres, and at least 400 meters from any other treatment. We will have a minimum of 4 replicates of each treatment, but will increase replicates in accordance to the number of farmers that volunteer for our experiment. Prior to the beginning of the treatments, we will conduct a visual survey of each plot to determine ground squirrel activity. We will count all ground squirrels on the study plots during a 3-day period prior to treatment and for three days after treatment. Each plot will be scanned 4 times during a 10 minute period. All squirrels observed during each scan will be recorded. The order that each plot is counted will be varied daily. Effect of Treatments We will use the maximum number of ground squirrels observed during the four scans as an index of the population density in each plot for the day counted. We will calculate the average maximum number of squirrels recorded for each 3-day count period for each plot. We will use Kolmogorov-Smirnov nonparametric test to compare the number of ground squirrels recorded in pre- and post-treatment periods. We also will use a one-way

ANOVA and Duncan s multiple range test to compare results from pre- and posttreatment counts. The measure of the success will ultimately be a reduction in the numbers squirrels counted. Educational Products: The purpose of the study is to provide information of the best practices to reduce ground squirrel numbers to local farmers. Therefore, our study results will be disseminated directly to local farmers and via open-access forums. Peer-reviewed paper presented at professional meetings and published in an openaccess peer-reviewed journal. A PowerPoint presentation will be put together to use at local and state farmer meetings. This presentation will be posted on the extension.usu.edu/wildlifeconflicts website for future public access. Extension Bulletins and Fact Sheets will be written describing the research results. The Bulletin will be a Best Management Practices guideline. The results will be discussed in the county extension newsletters and presented at local and regional farmer meetings including the Pesticide Recertification Classes held in Delta and Richfield. Professional Development The results of the research will be presented at the National Agricultural Agents Association National meeting. The information will also be shared with other USU Extension Agents at the Utah Ag Agent meetings and will be distributed in the proceedings. The fact sheet will be peer reviewed and posted to the Extension Website. The operation of the most effective methods will be demonstrated during the annual USU Extension conference. Evaluation We will conduct a post growing season survey, to assess cooperator application of control measures, success and satisfaction, will also ask them how much it is costing them to control the squirrels and if they feel like our control program is helping them lower their damage costs. We will repeat ground squirrel surveys in the following spring to determine the effectiveness of our methods to reduce ground squirrel numbers on a landscape level. Project Timeline: All research conducted during the 2015 growing season January Beaver County Crop School Discuss the research project with farmers who are having squirrel problems.

February March April 1 April 10-30 May June October November June - December March 2016 Buy bait stations, squirrel traps and bait and prebait. Monitor fields for ground squirrel infestation. Identify sites to conduct the trial and contact cooperating farmers. Confirm research sites and flag out study areas Conduct the trial. Monitor fields for ground squirrels. Present the results of the trial at the Utah Extension Agents Summer Meeting Present the results of the trial at the Western Region Ag. Agents Annual Meeting Present the results of the trail at the Regional Pesticide Recertification workshops Create the Bulletins and Fact Sheets Create the peer-reviewed publication and submit Demonstrate methods at the USU Extension Conference Budget Budget Wages Unit price Units Total Technician Salary $120 day 18 days $2,160.00 Technician Benefits @ 8.3% $17.00 Travel Technician to Field Site $48 trip 18 trips $864.00 PI To Field Site, Cooperators' Meetings $500.00 Co-PI to Field Site to Prep Site $48/trip 5 trips $240.00 National Professional Meetings NACAA

Registration $150.00 1 $150.00 Hotel $120.00 5 $600.00 Airfare $650.00 1 $650.00 Vertebrate Pest Conference Registration $250.00 1 $250.00 Airfare $500.00 1 $500.00 Supplies Squirrel Traps Tube Trap Squirrel Trap $46.55 20 $931.00 Squirrelinator $65.40 20 $1,308.00 Bait Stations $35.34 20 $706.80 Other Direct Costs Publication Fees $250.00 Total $9,126.80 Wages: We are requesting $2177 in funds to support a technician to collect data. One undergraduate technician will be hired at a rate of $12/hour. This person will work 10- hour days, including travel. During the 1-month trial period, the technician will work 18 days. Travel: We are requesting $3754 in travel funds. The technician will be hired via Dr. Nicki Frey, through Southern Utah University. Traveling out of Cedar City, an estimated round-trip cost is $48 per trip, for 18 trips. Dr. Frey will also travel to the study sites an estimated 5 times, to set up the study, at a cost of $48/trip. Mr. Nelsen will travel within Beaver County to obtain volunteers for the study, attend collaborator meetings and assess field conditions. Additionally, we are asking for funds to support Mr. Nelsen s travel to the National Association of County Agricultural Agents, to present our study s findings. The estimated costs of travel are listed above, totaling $1400. Finally, we are requesting funds to partially support Dr. Frey s travel to the Vertebrate Pest Conference in March 2016. Because the conference date is beyond the scope of the projected, we are requesting only those funds that can be used prior to January 2016. The requested funds total $750. Supplies: We are requesting $2945 in funds for supplies to by squirrel traps and materials to create bait stations. Additionally, we are requesting $250 to support publications fees for publishing in an open access professional journal.