Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction

Similar documents
Geometric Design Tables

City of Madison, East Johnson Street North Baldwin Street to First Street Local Street Dane County

City of Madison, East Johnson Street North Baldwin Street to First Street Local Street Dane County

ADA Training Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) 2018 MnDOT

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Designing with the Railroad

Roadway Design Manual

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

Off-Road Facilities Part 1: Shared Use Path Design

Roadway Design Manual

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

01. VICINITY OF GREENBRAE POC: EXISTING CONDITIONS

Atwood Avenue Fair Oaks Avenue Cottage Grove Road

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Agenda Staff Report

Construction Specifications Manual

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN

Board of Supervisors February 27, 2017

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications

Municipal Class EA To Address Traffic Congestion On The Ontario Street Corridor (Grand Bend) Public Information Meeting June 4, 2018

GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION STREETS TABLE 1A CG-6 CURB AND GUTTER SECTION

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

NORTH DOWNTOWN N EAST WEST

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

COMPLETE STREETS DURING CONSTRUCTION

Fleur Drive Reconstruction

How Might Connected Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles Influence Geometric Design? October 10, 2017

Thank you for attending

Public Works Committee Meeting Richard E. Mastrangelo Council Chamber November 20, 2017

Rebuilding Highway 7 Town Centre Boulevard to Sciberras Road

700 Multi-Modal Considerations

Driveway Design Criteria

Shared Use Path Design

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

The 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide: An Overview

CHAPTER 7 STREET DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Henderson Ave. Complete Streets Project

Project Overview. Rolling Road Widening Fairfax County. Get Involved. Design Public Hearing. Contact Information

GIS Based Data Collection / Network Planning On a City Scale. Healthy Communities Active Transportation Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio May 10, 2011

Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

Attached for your reference please find project updates on ongoing VDOT construction projects in Southampton County.

Who is Toole Design Group?

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

Update to DOTD Roundabout Design Policy

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

Paul Vraney Bureau of Project Development 02/11/2016

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

BPP / SUB

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP

GENERAL. 1. Description

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

Montgomery County Life Sciences Center. LOOP TRAIL GSSC Implementation Advisory Committee Meeting #2 March 26, 2015

Toole Design Group is live tweeting this webinar

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

GDOT Cross Section Elements. Course ID: GDOT PDH Credits

Potential Bicycle Facility on Bayou Street Mobile, Alabama

Design Overview. Section 4 Standard Plans for Design. Pedestrian Access Routes. Pedestrian Access Routes. Overview. Cross Slope

Bolton, CT. January 7, 2016

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Page 2D-10 Added the following language at the end of the paragraph under REFINING HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT ; See Chapter 2A, Section 2A-6.

Part-time Shoulder Use Guide

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

3-13 UFC - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN FOR ROADS, STREETS, WALKS, AND OPEN

City of Dallas Standards and Guidelines for Traffic Control and Safety Treatments at Trail-Road Crossings

Lawrence Avenue Streetscape Concepts August 30, 2011

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study. Old Colony Planning Council

Design Public Hearing MassDOT Project # February 19, 2015 Chatham Town Hall Annex 7:00 P.M.

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

Figure 4-10: Pedestrian Improvements Types of Potential Station Area Improvements - Place-Making Improvements

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

DRAFT Montgomery County Bicycle Master Plan Design Toolkit

ADA PRESENTATION (CURB RAMPS)

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

Building Great Neighbourhoods BELLEVUE AND VIRGINIA PARK

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

APPENDIX A PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE RECOMMENDATION PLANNING TOOLKIT

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

APPENDIX D COST SUMMARY TABLES

REPORT OF THE SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATION COMMITTEE

Transportation and General Civil Engineering Projects

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Poor pavement condition Substandard Intersections. / Substandard bike/pedestrian/transit accommodations. Driveway access Environmental concerns

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Information on display. Inside this handout. Triangle Area revisions. Project need displays. Preferred alternative on aerial maps

What Is a Complete Street?

List of Display Boards

S.R. 3009, Section A20 South Park & Logan Road Intersection Improvement Project

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

Transcription:

TOWN OF SUNDERLAND Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction Presented by Lou Rabito, P.E. Presented to Town of Sunderland June 11, 2018

Project Overview MassDOT Project No. 607245 Resurfacing and Related Work on a Section of North Main Street (Route 47), from Route 116 to Claybrook Drive 25% Design submitted by CHA in June 2017 HSH performed a Peer review on 5/21/2018 HSH revised Peer review on 6/5/2018 to reflect new District supported option

Current Design 25% Design Proposed: 11-Foot Travel Lanes 2-Foot Shoulders 8-foot Sidepath on the West 5-foot Sidewalk on the East Concern from Public Visual Impact of 8-foot sidepath Request to compare bike lane option

Option 1: Sidepath (25% Design)

Option 1: Sidepath (25% Design) 8-Foot Sidepath Proposed vs. 10-Foot Shared Use Path Minimize impacts and low anticipated bike volumes Narrow 2-foot shoulders assist with Traffic Calming Sidewalk on east side to be re-built Several large mature trees along corridor Care should be taken when working within the root zone of these trees. Consult with MA Certified Arborist and Town Tree Warden New sidewalk proposed north of North Silver Lane 5-foot sidewalk with 5-foot grass buffer Utility pole placement should be evaluated as they are within the clear zone.

Option 1: Sidepath (25% Design) Item Benefits Challenges Sidepath covers bike and ped accommodations in the same space. Addition of sidepath reduces existing green space along the roadway. Option 1 25% Design Minimal roadway widening A narrower roadway cross section can act as a traffic calming measure. Potential for more tree impacts than what is shown on the plans Concern about utility poles being too close to the edge of pavement. Proposed design fits without requiring the addition of vertical curb (and subsequent drainage system).

Option 2: Bicycle Lanes

Option 2: Bicycle Lanes Standard 11-foot travel lanes with 5-foot bike lanes Widens road 3-feet on each side (32-feet curb to curb) Wider roadway may lead to higher operating speeds Visual Impact of wider roadway Still requires updated sidewalk on west side Potential for tree impacts when rebuilding sidewalk Widening north of North Silver Lane: Sidewalk needs to be shifted to avoid need for curb Additional permanent easements may be needed for grading Utility poles should be relocated further from road

Option 2: Bicycle Lanes Item Benefits Challenges Dedicated on-street bike lanes Requires the roadway cross section to widen by 3-feet on each side. Option 2: 11 Lanes & Bike Lanes Reduces the visual impact to green space caused by the sidepath. Still requires a proposed sidewalk on the west side (unless a design exception was granted). Visual impact of a 32-ft vs. 24-ft wide road will be greater than that of an 8-ft path vs. 5-ft sidewalk. A widened roadway may require shifting of utility poles and the proposed sidewalk north of North Silver Lane unless curb is added. Potential tree impacts. Adds cost from additional full depth pavement. (Not including add utility pole relocations if needed).

Option 3: 10-foot Lanes + Bicycle Lanes

Option 3: 10-foot Lanes + Bicycle Lanes Narrow 10-foot travel lanes with 5-foot bike lanes Requires Design Exception Widens road 2-feet on each side Narrow travel lanes help provide traffic calming Lesser visual impact Still requires updated sidewalk on west side Potential concerns for tree impacts Widening north of North Silver Lane: Sidewalk needs to be shifted to avoid vertical curb Additional permanent easements may be needed for grading Utility poles should be relocated further from road

Option 3: 10-foot Lanes + Bicycle Lanes Item Benefits Challenges Option 3: 10 Lanes & Bike Lanes Dedicated on-street bike lanes Reduces the visual impact to green space caused by the sidepath. Narrow travel lanes act as a traffic calming measure Roadway would widen by 2-feet on each side. Still requires a proposed sidewalk on the west side (unless a design exception was granted). A widened roadway may require shifting of utility poles and the proposed sidewalk north of North Silver Lane unless curb is added. Potential for tree impacts from proposed sidewalks

Option 4: No Bicycle Accommodations Removes the 8-foot sidepath Proposed 11-foot lanes and 2-foot shoulder Narrow roadway helps reduce speeds Least amount of physical and visual impact Still requires updated sidewalk on west side Potential for tree impacts Requires Design Exception for not providing bicycle accommodations. Unlikely that MassDOT would grant this waiver given the size of the corridor and available ROW.

Option 4: No Bicycle Accommodations

Option 4: No Bicycle Accommodations Item Benefits Challenges Option 4 No Bike Accommodations Minimal roadway widening & no sidepath reduces impacts (physical and visual). Decreases costs a small amount by going from an 8-foot sidepath to a 5-foot sidewalk. Does not provide bike accommodations. Still requires a proposed sidewalk on the west side (unless an additional design exception was granted). Design Exceptions req d from MassDOT Potential for tree impacts from proposed sidewalks.

Option 1 vs. Option 3

Design Exception Process FHWA and MassDOT recognize 13 controlling criteria from AASHTO Policy. If not met, a formal Design Exception is required: Design Speed Lane Width Shoulder Width Horizontal Alignment Vertical Alignment Cross slope Stopping Sight Distance Superelevation Horizontal Clearance Grades Other 3 criteria apply only to bridges: width, structural capacity, and vertical clearance

Design Exceptions Bike & Ped In 2014 Engineering Directive E-14-006 introduced new controlling criteria for pedestrian and bicycle accommodations to support the Healthy Transportation Policy. This Directive outlines minimum pedestrian and bicycle accommodations that must be met depending on the type of roadway and type of project. For the North Main Street (Route 47) project, bicycle and pedestrian accommodations would be required on both sides of the road in the form of: Sidewalks (min 5 wide) and 5-foot bike lanes or protected bike facilities (sidepath/shared use path)

Design Exception Process If a Design Exception is being requested, a formal Design Exception Report (DER) along with MassDOT s Design Criteria Workbook is completed and submitted to MassDOT with the 25% Design. Each month MassDOT s Design Exception Review Committee meets to discuss each DER. The committee will either approve, deny, or may submit comments that the applicant can address then re-submit for further review.

Anticipate Design Exceptions Option 3: Lane Width 10-foot lanes MassDOT has verbally okayed this design exception Option 4: Bicycle Accommodations A Design Exception for Horizontal Offset appears to be needed for all options due to proposed utility poles closer than 4-foot from the edge of road north of North Silver Lane

Considerations Option 3 results in best compromise between what the Town is looking for and what MassDOT would allow. New sidewalk on west side does not need to be located next to roadway. The sidewalk can meander away from roadway where space allows The goal would be to place in location that results in least amount of tree impacts.

Your Title Here. Level One Questions? Level Two Level Three