Appendix F. Commercial and Recreational Fisheries Summary

Similar documents
To Fish or Not to Fish? A role-playing activity based on the Marine Reserves process at the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary

Commercial Fisheries in the South Coast s Marine Protected Areas

Socioeconomic Profile and Spatial Analysis of Fisheries in the three central California National Marine Sanctuaries

California Management of Forage Fish Species. Deb Wilson- Vandenberg Senior Environmental Scientist California Department of Fish and Game

WEST COAST FISHERIES AND MANAGEMENT

Essential Fish Habitat

To Fish or Not to Fish?

Coastal Pelagic Species

9 This section relies heavily on

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

California s North Coast Fishing Communities Historical Perspective and Recent Trends

canada s in-depth guide to Sustainable Seafood .org SeaChoice is a sustainable seafood program of the following four conservation groups:

Office of Science & Technology

Food Chain. Marine Food Webs and Fisheries

M. James Allen and Robert M. Voglin COMMERCIAL FISH CATCHES

GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM (GMT) REPORT ON CONSIDERATION OF INSEASON ADJUSTMENTS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

Productivity Susceptibility Analysis (PSA) Tool overview and preliminary findings

Agenda Item G.1.a Supplemental CDFW Report 2 September 2015

GEAR TECHNOLOGY NOTE - Towed Gear

Essential Fish Habitat

California Department of Fish and Wildlife Report to the International Pacific Halibut Commission on 2017 California Fisheries

SOCIETAL GOALS TO DETERMINE ECOSYSTEM HEALTH: A FISHERIES CASE STUDY IN GALVESTON BAY SYSTEM, TEXAS

23 The main sources used for this

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE REPORT ON INSEASON CHANGES

Fisheries. The State of The Ocean Another way for our growing population to get protein is by eating fish. The four most popular fish are

***This summary does not include shad and herring net requirements.***

BRITISH COLUMBIA SEAFOOD INDUSTRY YEAR IN REVIEW

GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM REPORT ON CONSIDERATION OF INSEASON ADJUSTMENTS, INCLUDING CARRYOVER. Annual Vessel Limit (15.4%)

Rule 26 - Fishing vessels

Sustainable Seas - Marine Fisheries Fisheries and Fishing

Groundfish Harvest Specifications and Management Measures. Tillamook August 6 Newport August 7 Brookings August 12 North Bend August 13

FISHERIES REVIEW CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 43, 2002

What are the threats to the oceans? Consequences. Four examples. Tuna

Framework 35 Northeast Multispecies FMP

Name: Morgan Kammerer Topic: Unsustainable Fishing Methods

Exhibit E Recreational Abalone Fishery Management

Enforcement and Compliance within South Coast Marine Protected Areas

Monterey Bay Fishermen Exempted Fishing Permit

Orange County MPA Watch A n n u a l R e p o r t

Tuna [211] 86587_p211_220.indd 86587_p211_220.indd /30/04 12/30/04 4:53:37 4:53:37 PM PM

Observing and Explaining Coastal Fishery Dynamics : An Application to Ports in California

Orange County MPA Watch A n n u a l R e p o r t

Fisheries off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan;

Agenda Item J.2 Attachment 1 September 2016

STATUS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MARINE FISHERY RESOURCES 2014

Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series ONMS-14-02

OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT AND OTHER MARINE FISH SPECIES

The Transformation Status of Marine Commercial Fisheries. and Marine Aquaculture in South Africa

North Pacific Fishery Management Council. Community considerations in Federally-managed fisheries. April 2005

Fish Conservation and Management

Fishing and Aquaculture Notes

HOW CAN WE HELP TO SUSTAIN AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY?

Modeling effects of fishing closures in the Western Florida Shelf

California Fixed Gear and Recreational Fisheries Pedro Point (between San Francisco and Half Moon Bay)

CA Department of Fish and Wildlife

Fish Conservation and Management

Commercial Anchovy Fishery Public Meeting

SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD MATCHING

tools for spatial management see the collection by Wright and Scholz (2005).


2015 Nearshore Logbook Report and 2017 Groundfish Fishery Regulations

= new from the previous year = deleted from the previous year

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-08 TARGET SIZE FOR THE TUNA FLEET IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

Orange County MARINE PROTECTED AREAS

Socioeconomic Profile of Fisheries in the Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones NMSs

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

SMOOTH HAMMERHEAD SHARK (HHS)

FishSA: Presentation Jeremy Marillier Executive Director

NOMINAL CPUE FOR THE CANADIAN SWORDFISH LONGLINE FISHERY

California s Marine Environment. Highly Variable Narrow Continental Shelf Upwelling and El Nino

OVERVIEW OF SOME MARINE COASTAL FISHERIES IN MADAGASCAR. RANDRIAMIARISOA and RAFIDISON Roginah MADAGASCAR

5. purse seines 3 000

Management under the Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan

2017 PACIFIC HALIBUT CATCH SHARING PLAN FOR AREA 2A

Kodiak and Alaska Peninsula Commercial Dungeness Crab Fisheries, Report to the Alaska Board of Fisheries. Michael P. Ruccio.

Orange County MPA Watch Program Quarterly Report (Jan 1 March 31, 2012)

REGIONAL AND LOCAL VARIATION OF BOTTOM FISH AND INVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS

Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan. Appendix F Overfished Species Rebuilding Plans

Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND. Attachment 1

Draft Discussion Document. May 27, 2016

MARKET SQUID. Loligo opalescens. Sometimes known as Opal Squid, Ika SUMMARY

Oregon's Sardine Fishery 2006 Summary

Orange County MPA Watch M o n i t o r i n g H u m a n U s a g e

City of Ketchikan and Other Places Within the Ketchikan Gateway Borough:

FISHERIES REVIEW CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 44, 2003

TRENDS IN FISHERIES and FISHERY RESOURCES

Problems of TAC forecast development for multi-species fisheries in the Sakhalin-Kuriles region

Updated landings information for the commercial fisheries in Puerto Rico with emphasis on silk and queen snapper and parrotfish fisheries

no-take zone 1 of 5 Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary, California

Groundfish EFP Proposal: Trolled Longline for Chilipepper off California October 2011 Agenda Item D.4.a Attachment 1 June 2012

Spatial/Seasonal overlap between the midwater trawl herring fishery and predator focused user groups

Ketchikan and Other Nearby Places:

Factors influencing production

October Net Loss: Overfishing Off the Pacific Coast

NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE REPORT ON PACIFIC HALIBUT CATCH SHARING PLAN CHANGES FOR 2015

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE RECOMMENDATIONS ON ADDITIONAL WINTER-RUN PROTECTIONS IN 2016 OCEAN FISHERIES

COUNTRY NOTE ON NATIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS -- SPAIN

Orange County MPA Watch 2016 A n n u a l R e p o r t

NOAA Fisheries Update:

Transcription:

Appendix F Commercial and Recreational Fisheries Summary

0 0 Appendix F - Commercial and Recreational Fisheries Summary Commercial and recreational fishing activities occur at various locations within the Project area and surrounding environs. A wide variety of finfish and shellfish species are harvested in the Santa Barbara Channel area, while kelp is harvested in specific beds that are managed by CDFG. An analysis of fishery and kelp data collected around the Project area for the ten-year period from to 00 forms the basis for the summary of commercial and recreational fishing that follows. Fish blocks are statistical units used by CDFG (00a) to organize and report commercial and recreational harvesting of marine organisms off the California coast (Figure F-). Monthly catches are reported within rectangular blocks nominally covering 00 square miles (nine by -mile rectangular areas, or km ). However, where the coastline bisects such blocks, they cover proportionally smaller ocean areas. The fish blocks identified in Figure F- encompass an area of,00 square miles (, km²) and are used here to assess potential impacts from the proposed Project on commercial and recreational fisheries in the region. Platform Holly and the offshore portions of the Project are located within Block, whose ocean area is reduced because it encompasses the Goleta and Ellwood coastline. Fish Block extends into water depths of,00 feet (00 m) and contains seafloor habitat that varies from nearshore rocky shelf to soft sediments in water depths beyond 0 feet ( m). Commercial Fishing Over the last decade, commercial fisheries within the Santa Barbara Channel have had a profound impact on local economies because over percent of the weight and percent of the value was landed at the four major ports within the Santa Barbara Channel (Santa Barbara, Ventura, Oxnard, and Port Hueneme). This 0,-ton harvest was valued at $.0 Million (M) (Table F-). March 0 F- Ellwood Pipeline Company

Figure F- Locations of California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Fish Blocks within the Santa Barbara Channel L a t i t u d e Point Arguello Project Site Santa Barbara Santa Barbara Channel 0 0 Ventura Oxnard Port Hueneme 0 Longitude N Source: CDFG 00a. Ellwood Pipeline Company F- March 0

Table F- Ranking of Fish Commercially Harvested in the SB Channel from to 00 Total Weight (Tons) Dollar Value (M) Taxon Weight Percent Taxon $ Value Percent Squid,.0% Squid..% Sardine 0,.% Urchin..% Anchovy,.% Shrimp 0.0.% Urchin,.% Lobster..% Mackerel,.% Halibut..% Shrimp,0.% Crab..% Crab,.0% Sardine..% Tuna, 0.% Anchovy..0% Sea Cucumber, 0.% Rockfish..% Halibut 0 0.% Abalone.00.% Lobster 0.% Seabass..% Shark 00 0.% Sea Cucumber..% Rockfish 0.% Shark. 0.% Seabass 0.% Tuna.0 0.% Sheephead 0.0% Sheephead 0. 0.% Abalone 0 0.0% Mackerel 0. 0.% Grouper 0.0% Salmon 0. 0.% Sole 0.0% Swordfish 0. 0.% Snail 0.0% Hagfish 0. 0.% Skate 0.0% Sole 0. 0.% Hagfish 0.0% Sablefish 0. 0.% Barracuda 0.0% Grouper 0. 0.% Other 0 0.% Other 0. 0.% Grand Total 0, 00.0% Grand Total.0 00.0% Notes: Table is data based on combined landings at Santa Barbara, Oxnard, Ventura, Port Hueneme, Los Angeles, and Morro Bay. ton = 0. metric ton. Source: CDFG 00a. Of the over different fish taxa harvested commercially within the -block study region from through 00, a few major taxonomic groups represent the bulk of the commercial catch (Table F-). For example, squid represented two thirds of the total biomass and percent of the total catch value. Meanwhile, sardines, anchovies, urchins, mackerel, shrimp, and crab made up most (0 percent) of the remaining biomass. Pound for pound, however, the value of the individual fish taxa varied significantly. Consequently, more expensive taxa, such as urchin, shrimp, lobster, March 0 F- Ellwood Pipeline Company

0 0 0 halibut, and crab ranked higher in total dollar value, representing percent of the value of the non-squid fish harvest. Table F- shows that the type of fish landed at each of the four port complexes varied. This is largely due to differences in fishing fleets, areas fished, and the available commercial facilities at each port. For example, the high dollar value ($. M) of the commercial catch landed at Santa Barbara is largely due to non finfish species harvested from the fishing grounds along the western Channel Islands. Urchin, lobster, crab, shrimp, halibut, and abalone are of high commercial value and were the six mostvaluable taxa landed here during the ten year period. In fact, over half ( percent) of the urchin, lobster, crab, shrimp, and abalone harvested in the -block study region were harvested from the four fish blocks ( through 0 in Figure F-) that encompass the north shore of the western Channel Islands; species caught here are preferentially landed at the Santa Barbara harbor because of its proximity. In contrast to the range of taxa landed at Santa Barbara, market squid (Loligo opalescens) overwhelmingly dominated the landings at the Hueneme/Oxnard (. percent by weight and. percent by value) and Ventura (. percent by weight and. percent by value) harbors over the last decade. Prior to April the market squid fishery was an unregulated, open access fishery and squid often ranked as California s largest commercial fishery and highest edible fishery export (CDFG, 00). To better control this rapidly expanding fishery the CDFG instituted new regulations, such as the restricted use of lights, documentation of fishing activity in logbooks, weekend closures, light-boat shielding, and wattage restrictions. As seen in Figure F-, the annual squid catch offshore California has increased exponentially, doubling approximately every nine years since, when the total catch was a mere,000 tons. However, this increase has not been steady. Squid are extraordinarily sensitive to water temperature, favoring temperatures in the high 0s to mid-0s Fahrenheit. In El Niño years, when water temperatures increase beyond this range, the squid catch typically plummets. Significant declines in catch volumes have occurred during major El Niño events in,, and (Figure F-). Between 000 and 00, most of the squid harvested near the Project area were landed close to shore, an area that could be impacted by an oil spill associated with the proposed Project as predicted by the spill modeling described in Section.. Ellwood Pipeline Company F- March 0

Table F- Ranking of Commercial Fish Landings at Local Harbors by Weight and Volume Santa Barbara Port Hueneme/Oxnard Ventura Morro Bay/Avila Weight Value Weight Value Weight Value Weight Value Urchin (0.) Squid (.) Shrimp (.) Crab (.) Cucumber (.) Lobster (.) Halibut (.) Shark (.) Seabass (00.0) Rockfish (.) Abalone (0.) Snail (.) Sheephead (.) Salmon (.) Sole (.0) Other (.) Total (,00.) Urchin (.) Lobster (.0) Shrimp (.) Crab (.) Halibut (.) Abalone (.) Rockfish (.) Squid (.) Cucumber (.) Seabass (0.) Shark (0.) Sheephead (0.) Salmon (0.) Snail (0.0) Fish (0.0) Other (0.0) Total (.) Squid (0.) Sardine (.) Anchovy (.) Mackerel (0.) Urchin (.) Tuna (0.) Shrimp (.) Halibut (.) Crab (.) Cucumber (.) Rockfish (.) Lobster (0.0) Hagfish (0.) Shark (0.) Sheephead (.) Other (.) Total (,.) Weight is reported in tons. Value is reported in millions of dollars. Source: CDFG 00a Squid (0.0) Shrimp (.) Sardine (.) Anchovy (.) Halibut (.) Urchin (.0) Lobster (.) Crab (0.) Rockfish (0.0) Cucumber (0.) Sheephead (0.0) Mackerel (0.) Seabass (0.) Shark (0.) Hagfish (0.) Other (0.) Total (.) Squid (.) Shrimp (.) Halibut (0.) Crab (.) Seabass (.0) Shark (.) Sardine (.) Cucumber (0.) Grouper (.) Urchin (.) Anchovy (.) Tuna (.0) Rockfish (0.) Skate (.) Lobster (.) Other (0.) Total (,.) Squid (0.) Halibut (.) Shrimp (.) Crab (0.) Seabass (0.) Lobster (0.0) Shark (0.) Cucumber (0.) Urchin (0.) Rockfish (0.) Grouper (0.0) Sheephead (0.0) Skate (0.0) Sole (0.0) Tuna (0.0) Other (0.) Total (.0) Rockfish (.) Squid (.) Tuna (.) Shrimp (.) Sole (.) Crab (0.) Shark (.) Sablefish (.) Salmon (.) Urchin (.) Anchovy (.) Swordfish (.) Fish (.) Abalone (.) Cucumber (.) Other (.) Total (.0) Shrimp (0.) Rockfish (0.) Tuna (0.0) Crab (0.0) Abalone (0.0) Sole (0.0) Swordfish (0.0) Salmon (0.0) Shark (0.0) Sablefish (0.0) Squid (0.0) Urchin (0.0) Lobster (0.0) Seabass (0.0) Halibut (0.0) Other (0.00) Total (0.) March 0 F- Ellwood Pipeline Company

Figure F- Annual Statewide Commercial Squid Landings Market Squid Landings (Tons) 0 0 0 El Niño El Niños 0 0 0 (Metric Tons) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 Source: CDFG 00a. Year 0 0 0 Similar to the variability in squid landings, the catch statistics for abalone have varied substantially over time. Currently, all five major species of abalone (white, black, red, pink, and green) found off central and southern California are considered depleted. This depletion is the result of cumulative impacts from commercial harvest, increased market demand and sport fishery expansion, sea otter depredation, habitat degradation, disease, loss of kelp populations associated with El Niño events, substantial poaching losses, and inadequate wild stock management (CDFG 00). In response to these pressures, the California Fish and Game Commission closed the commercial and recreational abalone fishery in southern and central California under emergency action in May. By legislative action in January, the closure was extended indefinitely. Therefore, abalone landings were only recorded in the -block survey area through and part of. Differences in the volume and dollar value of the catch landed at each of the five port complexes are apparent in Table F-. Although Santa Barbara consistently ranks first in value of commercial catch from the -block study region, the loss of revenue from the abalone fishery following is readily apparent. Landings at Ventura and Hueneme/Oxnard harbors correlated closely with one another, with both exhibiting significant drops in, in response to the strong El Niño event. Additionally, the Ellwood Pipeline Company F- March 0

major increase in landings at the Los Angeles/Long Beach port complex in was due to increased squid landings. Table F- Volume and Value of Fish Commercially Harvested in the -Block Region by Year and Port Morro Bay/Avila Santa Barbara Ventura Port Hueneme/ Oxnard Los Angeles/ Long Beach Year Weight Value Weight Value Weight Value Weight Value Weight Value 0.,0. 0 0.,. 0. 0.,.,.,.0, 0. 0.,0. 0.,.,0 0. 0.0,.00,.0,.,.0 000 0.,.,.,., 0.0 00 0.,.,.0,.,. 00 0.0,0.0,0.,0., 0. 00 0.0,.,.,0.,0 0. 00 0.0,.,.0,.,0. 00 0.0,.,0.0,0. 0. Total 0.,00.,.0,.,. Weight is reported in tons. Value is reported in millions of dollars. Source: CDFG 00a 0 As described above, the commercial fishery productivity fluctuates during El Niño events, and landings differ among ports for individual taxonomic groups. In addition, the catch is not uniformly distributed across the -block study region. Instead, it is heavily weighted toward the Channel-Island blocks ( through 0 in Figure F-). Over percent of the total weight and percent of the total value of the commercial catch was from those four fish blocks. In contrast, fish block, which encompasses the Project area and Platform Holly, accounts for less than one-half percent of the commercial landings in the -block study region (Table F-). Overall, non-finfish taxa such as urchin, shrimp, lobster, and crab were the primary catch landed within the block for both total biomass and total value. Over percent of the total biomass recovered from block was urchin and shrimp. However, the lobster catch ranked highest in overall value in Block, accounting for over percent of the total value. March 0 F- Ellwood Pipeline Company

Table F- Ranking of Top Fifteen Commercial Fish Taxa Harvested in Block from to 00 Ranking Taxon Weight Taxon Value Urchin. Lobster 0.0 Shrimp. Shrimp 0. Sea Cucumber. Urchin 0.0 Lobster. Sea Cucumber 0. Crab. Halibut 0. Tuna.0 Crab 0.0 Halibut. Rockfish 0.0 Squid. Tuna 0.0 Rockfish. Salmon 0.0 0 Salmon. Abalone 0.0 Shark.0 Seabass 0.0 Seabass. Shark 0.0 Abalone. Squid 0.0 Swordfish. Swordfish 0.0 Sheephead 0. Sheephead 0.0 Total.0 Total. Weight is reported in tons. Value is reported in millions, of dollars. Source: CDFG 00a 0 Within the Project area, between Platform Holly and the shoreline, fishing is largely focused on crab, lobster, and halibut. As discussed in Section., Cultural Resources, crab and lobster traps constituted nearly half ( percent) of the seafloor features identified in the high-resolution bathymetric survey conducted as part of this EIR. Although many of these traps were abandoned, their large numbers attest to the intensity of this fishery within the area potentially impacted by the proposed Project. Also during the offshore survey, commercial halibut trawling was observed near the pipeline corridor that extends from Platform Holly to the EOF. In contrast to many areas of the southern California coast, halibut trawling is allowed within the three-mile (. km) limit between Pt. Dume and Pt. Arguello, and is most common in water depths of 0 feet (m) or more. Gear Several types of fishing gear are utilized by commercial fishermen within the -block study area (Table F-). As a result of fluctuations in market demand, prices, harvest Ellwood Pipeline Company F- March 0

regulations, and fish availability, commercial fishers within the study area may fish for several species throughout the year. As such, several types of fishing gear are used, including the usage of gear types capable of targeting multiple species (MMS 00b). Common gear types used in the region include: () seines for coastal pelagic species such as sardine, northern anchovy, mackerel, and market squid; () trawls for shrimp, sole, flounder, and halibut; () hook and line/longlines for rockfish and other rocky outcrop fish; () traps for crab and lobster; () drift/set gillnets for shark and swordfish; and, () trolls for albacore and salmon. Table F- Comparison of Commercial Fish Landings between the entire - Block Study Area and Block from to 00 as a Function of Gear Type Weight Value Gear Region Block Gear Region Block Seine,0 Seine. 0.0 Diving, Diving. 0. Trawl, Trap..0 Trap, 0 Trawl..0 Net, Gill Net. 0.0 Gill Net, Hook & Line.0 0. Hook & Line 0 0 Net. 0.00 Troll 0 Troll 0. 0.0 Other 0 Other 0.0 0.00 Harpoon 0 Harpoon 0.00 0.00 Grand Total 0, Grand Total.0. Weight is reported in tons. Value is reported in millions of dollars. Source: CDFG 00a. 0 Within the entire -block study area, purse seiners targeting squid were responsible for landing the largest biomass (Table F-) (Vojkovich, ). Seines are generally used to encircle schools of pelagic fish species. Seiners will traverse an area along an erratic course searching for schools of fish using sonar. Once a school is found, a net is laid out on the surface to encircle the prey species. Floats along the upper lead line keep the top end of the net at the water surface. Metal rings are sewn along the bottom edge, and a cable is passed through the rings. When the cable is drawn tight, the net purses (Fields, ). While the season for pelagic fishes is open year-round, the CDFG sets catch quotas. When these quotas are filled, the fishery is over for that year unless an extended quota is subsequently issued. March 0 F- Ellwood Pipeline Company

0 0 0 Although seiners represented the largest biomass catch throughout the -block study region, within block, trawling and traps accounted for the largest catches. This is consistent with anecdotal observations of fishing activities observed during the offshore survey conducted as part of this EIR. Traps are predominantly used to catch non-finfish species such as urchin, shrimp, lobster, crab, and abalone. These species have historically been the most profitable catches within block over the past decade. Trawlers are responsible for extracting the greatest value from Block (Table F-), principally from the harvest of high value species such as shrimp, sea cucumber, and halibut. Trawls can be conducted either in midwater or along the seafloor, although bottom trawls occur most often in the study region. In their most basic form, trawls are funnel-shaped nets that are towed over the seafloor. As they are towed, the rope, chain, or line (e.g., tickler chain, bridles, etc.) that precedes the net opening scares prey up off the ocean bottom, to be captured in the netting that follows. The opening of the trawl is maintained by a headrope with floats on the top, a footrope with weights on the bottom, and doors to each side that spread the net horizontally on the seafloor. Trawling varies seasonally within the -block study region. Trapping is another important fishing method used within the study area. Pots and traps come in a variety of shapes and sizes. In the Project area, they are used primarily to capture crabs, lobsters, and to a lesser extent, prawns and certain fish species. Typically, several pots or traps are attached to a heavy groundline with an anchor or heavy weights attached at both ends. The ends of the line are connected to a surface buoy containing a marker. Crab pots in particular are set in hard-bottom habitats. They can be set individually or in groups attached to a common groundline. During installation and retrieval of traps and pots, they can be dragged several meters along the bottom. Pots and traps are generally used at water depths less than 0 feet (00 m) near hard bottom habitat or along the edges of canyons. However, pot fishing for sablefish can occur at depths up to,0 feet (00 m) along the edge of the continental shelf. Several fishing methods that use hooks attached to lines are utilized in the area for specific fisheries. Although they account for smaller biomass and value extracted from Block than either seining or trawling, they are important throughout the larger block study region. Vertical longlines employ a series of hooks attached to a weighted line and are suspended vertically in the water column. Vertical longlining is commonly used to fish for rockfish over hard-bottom structures. Horizontal bottom longlines are similar to vertical longlines except that the hooks lay on the seafloor. Ellwood Pipeline Company F-0 March 0

0 Weighted ends keep the line on the seafloor. Horizontal longlines are used to catch bottom fish such as halibut. Trolling consists of towing a baited hook or lure behind a boat. Trolling commonly occurs in the water column high off the bottom, but in certain years, trolling for salmon can occur close to the seafloor. Pelagic fish such as salmon or albacore tuna are the primary target catch within the study region. Gill and other nets are also used within the -block study area. Gill nets consist of a vertical wall of netting. Weights and anchors on the bottom horizontal line anchor the bottom portion of the net to the seafloor while a series of floats on the top lead line lift the upper portion of the net towards the ocean surface. Gill nets are used for a wide variety of fish including halibut, yellowtail, and rockfish. Diving has been one of the most important commercial fisheries within the -block study area, particularly in terms of the value of the catch. Most of the commercial diving in the region occurs along the Channel Islands. Divers primarily harvest sea urchins, although until abalone were also harvested within the study region. A small fishery also exists for sea cucumbers. Diving accounted for percent of the biomass harvested within Block and was used for the entire urchin harvest within the block. 0 0 Recreational Fishing Recreational fishing activities in the Santa Barbara Channel area occur from a variety of platforms. These include private or charter vessels, piers, and the shoreline (e.g., beaches, jetties, breakwaters). Other than fishing logs maintained by the commercial passenger fishing vessel (CPFV) fleet, reliable recreation fish landing data for specific locations off the coast are not available. Data on fish landed by the CPFV fleet that fish in the Project area are provided in Table F-. The numbers provided in the table are conservative estimates of CPFV catch landings because not all CPFV operators participate in the logbook program (Thompson, ). Nearly half (. percent) of the CPFV catch in the Santa Barbara Channel occurred near the Channel Islands, even though the seven Island blocks ( through 0, Figure F-) account for only. percent of the total Channel area (Table F-). The CPFV catch fraction around the Islands significantly exceeded the fractional area for all but two major taxa (barred sand bass and mackerel). Additionally, essentially all of the lobster harvested within the Channel was caught at the Islands. In contrast, the CPFV March 0 F- Ellwood Pipeline Company

catch in the fish block encompassing the Project area () was underrepresented relative to the total area covered (approximately three percent). Table F- Ranking of Recreationally Harvested Fish in the Santa Barbara Channel from to 00 Taxon SB Channel Total Island Fraction Mainland/ Open Fraction Rockfish,,.% 0.% Barred Sand Bass,.0%.0% Kelp Bass,.%.% Whitefish, ocean,.%.% Barracuda 0,.% 0.% Scorpionfish,.%.% Scallop,.%.% Mackerel, 0.%.% Sheephead,.%.% Halfmoon,.%.% Lobster,.%.% Yellowtail,0.%.% Other Fish Species,.%.% Total,0,.% 0.% Total fish count based on CPFV logs. Fraction of fish caught in the seven blocks ( through 0) that encompass the Channel Islands. Source: CDFG 00a. 0 Table F- shows that rockfish (Scorpaenidae) dominate ( percent) the CPFV catch within the Santa Barbara Channel. Thompson () estimated that private boats and the CPFV fleet land an equal number of rockfish. Combined, they account for 0 percent of the rockfish caught offshore California since. There are over 0 different species of rockfish found offshore California, of which are known to reside within the Southern California Bight. All rockfish species that have been formally assessed to date have populations that are currently below optimal abundance levels. Six rockfish species, including four that are important to California anglers (bocaccio, canary rockfish, widow rockfish, and cowcod), are at such low levels (estimated at or below percent of the pristine population of each species) that they have been declared overfished by the Pacific Fisheries Management Council. For the recreational fishery, bag limits have been reduced, gear restrictions imposed, seasons closed, and minimum size limits established (CDFG 00). Ellwood Pipeline Company F- March 0

0 However, rockfish are spatially localized, preferring high-relief hard-substrate seafloor features that are regularly visited by the CPFV fleet that targets them. Optimal areas are located along the northern shorelines of Santa Rosa and San Miguel Islands within fish blocks,, and 0 (Figure F-). Together, these blocks account for percent of the rockfish reported in Table F-. In contrast, no suitable hard-substrate features are frequented by the CPFV fleet within the fish-block () that encompasses the Project area; only one percent of rockfish landings were recorded within that block over the last decade. The CPFV fishery came under stringent regulations in mid-00, when fishing was prohibited for rockfish, lingcod, ocean whitefish, and California scorpionfish (sculpin) in waters 0 fathoms and greater in depth (Dotson and Charter 00). The restricted species were a mainstay for the winter CPFV fishery throughout the region. As a result, harvest counts for these species decreased substantially in 00, as seen in Table F-, which documents recreational landings of three key fish species by year. However, in mid-00, depth restrictions were relaxed, and catch numbers again increased. Table F- Recreational Landings of Rockfish, Whitefish, and Barred Sand Bass by Year in the Santa Barbara Channel Year Rockfish Whitefish Barred Sand Bass,,,0,00,,,,0,,,, 000,,, 00, 0,, 00, 0, 0, 00,0 0,, 00,,0, 00,,, Total,,,, Source: CDFG 00a. The numbers provided in the table are particularly conservative counts, as aside from scallops and lobsters, few landings of non-finfish species were reported to the CDFG by recreational charter boats or fishers. The top two taxa reported were the rock scallop and spiny lobster. These species were largely harvested by recreational divers at the March 0 F- Ellwood Pipeline Company

western end of the Channel Islands, and below Point Conception at shallow subtidal water depths such as Naples reef, which lies west of the Project area. As discussed in the previous section on commercial fisheries, landings of abalone were largely restricted to the earliest portion of the decade-long analysis period. 0 0 0 Commercial Kelp Harvesting and Mariculture Kelp has been harvested commercially along the coast of California since the early 00s (Scofield,, McPeak and Glantz, ; Neushul, ; Tarpley and Glantz, ). Beginning in, many small companies began harvesting along the coast between Santa Barbara and San Diego. In the early years, most kelp was harvested for the extraction of potash and acetone. These chemicals were used to manufacture explosives during World War I. Later, in the 0s, P.R. Park, Inc. of San Diego began harvesting kelp for use as an additive to livestock and poultry food. Mariculture companies rely on giant kelp as a food source for their stock, particularly for grazing species such as abalone. Over time, other uses for kelp and kelp derivatives have come into being. For example, algin is a kelp derivative that is commonly used as a thickening, stabilizing, suspending, and gelling agent in a wide range of foods, such as desserts, gels, dairy products, and salad dressings. Industrially, it is used in paper coatings, textile printing and weldingrod coatings. Algin is also used as a thickening and binding agent in pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and dental products. Annual sales of algin products manufactured in California exceeded $0 million (CDFG, 000). The CDFG is responsible for the management of kelp beds off the coast of California. In, they charted and numbered the kelp beds in coastal waters for management purposes. The numbering system has changed over the years, but there are presently designated beds stretching from the U.S.-Mexico border to Point Montara in San Mateo county (CDFG, 000). Kelp beds in the southern California region from the U.S.- Mexico border to Point Arguello are numbered one to along the mainland and 0 to around the Channel Islands (see Figure F-). Figure F- shows that a number of actively harvested kelp beds lie along the mainland coast adjacent to the Project area. These kelp beds can produce as much as,000 tons (0 metric tons) of kelp per year. Each kelp bed is of varying size and is delineated by true bearings. The amount of kelp that appears within each bed changes with time. Ellwood Pipeline Company F- March 0

Figure F- Locations and Yields of Kelp Beds in Southern California Source: CDFG 000 March 0 F- Ellwood Pipeline Company

0 0 0 Statewide, more than 0 harvesters hold current licenses to collect kelp. Among the largest of the commercial kelp harvesters is Kelco, currently known as ISP Alginates. ISP Alginates has harvested and processed giant kelp off California since. Over the years, they have developed many applications for algin, which is found in the cells of the kelp. Initially, ISP Alginates only harvested kelp beds near San Diego. However, in response to production needs and changes in kelp productivity, ISP Alginates later expanded their harvest area. In recent years, they have leased kelp beds, covering a total of approximately square miles, from Monterey Bay to Imperial Beach near the U.S.-Mexico border, and have accounted for up to percent of the kelp harvested in the entire State (CDFG, 000). As a result of ISP Alginate s relocation of its manufacturing facilities to Scotland in early 00, the statewide kelp harvest is expected to undergo a dramatic decrease. As discussed above, the mariculture industry also uses commercially harvested giant kelp. Generally, kelp is used as a food source for their stock, particularly abalone. Abalone aquaculture businesses range in size from large companies to small hobby operations. In, the combined abalone aquaculture firms accounted for less than. percent of the annual kelp harvest (CDFG, 000). However, their harvest is expected to increase in future years, as the supply of wild abalone continues to decrease worldwide. The Cultured Abalone of Santa Barbara currently leases bed, just west of Santa Barbara. Since, its kelp harvest has increased by percent annually in response to a growing abalone market (CDFG, 000). In, the Cultured Abalone harvested 0 tons (0 metric tons) of kelp. At that time, they expected to continue to increase their kelp requirement by percent annually through 00 (CDFG 000). Currently, approximately half of their tonnage comes from kelp lease, while the remainder is taken from kelp beds near Cambria. Commercial kelp landings have been monitored since (Tarpley and Glantz, ). Two types of data are collected as part of the monitoring effort. The first type of data consists of landing records that provide the weight, species, collector, and location of kelp harvested. Harvesters are required to provide this data to the CDFG on a monthly basis (CDFG, 000). The second type of data consists of non-landing statistics that are normally collected by the State agencies, the kelp harvesters, and the academic institutions. For example, ISP Alginates, the primary kelp harvester in California through 00 has conducted resource aerial surveys on a regular basis since. Most of the data they collected, however, is proprietary and unavailable to the public. The CDFG also conducts aerial surveys. Since 00, they have been flying annual Ellwood Pipeline Company F- March 0

0 aerial photo surveys of all of California's kelp beds. Previous surveys occurred only intermittently. The harvest or landing data submitted to the CDFG provides information on the category of plant landed, amount landed, location of harvest, and the name and address of the person or firm to whom the harvest was sold. The statewide kelp harvest data are summarized in Table F-. The annual California kelp harvest since has also been published by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS, 00) and shows a trend of declining harvests since the 0 s and 0 s when more than 0,000 tons were consistently harvested on an annual basis. As described earlier, the tonnage numbers for the 00 harvest, when available, are expected to exhibit a dramatic decline from those in Table F-, because ISP Alginate moved its manufacturing facilities from San Diego California to Scotland at the beginning of the year. Additionally, the unusually low total landings reported in Table F- during 00, are inconsistent with the NMFS data and suggest that the CDFG totals are, tons too low, probably because of underreported harvesting in the leased beds. Except for 00, 00, and 00, the total harvest from the leased beds was significantly higher than in open beds, even though there were half as many active leased beds as open beds. Table F- California Kelp Harvest (Macrocystis pyrifera) for -00 Year Open Beds Leased Beds Total Tons,,,,,,,,,,00,,,0,, 000,0,, 00,0, 0, 00,,, 00,, 0, 00,,, 00,,,0 Source: CDFG 00 0 Kelp Harvesting Vessels Kelp is harvested by reciprocating blades that are lowered into the water to a depth of three feet (one m) as the ship moves stern-first through the kelp bed. As the kelp is cut, March 0 F- Ellwood Pipeline Company

0 it is brought aboard via a conveyor system. Harvest vessels can carry as much as 00 tons of kelp, which can all be collected in a single day (CDFG, 000). The large harvest vessels have a draft of approximately feet (four m) and work at water depths greater than 0 feet (0 m). Kelp harvest vessels used by abalone aquaculturists are smaller than those used by the commercial harvesters. The smaller vessels have a shallower draft, making them capable of working in shallower waters. They typically carry between and tons of kelp. Kelp is also harvested by hand from smaller boats to supply abalone farms. It is either cut at the surface using a knife attached to a pole, or cut beneath the water surface by a diver and is generally pulled aboard the boat by hand. Ellwood Pipeline Company F- March 0