ANNEX 5 IMO MARINE CASULATY AND INCIDENT REPORT DAMAGE CARDS* AND INTACT STABILITY CASUALTY RECORDS

Similar documents
RULES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS IDENTIFIED BY THEIR MISSIONS CHAPTERS SCOPE

RESOLUTION MSC.235(82) (adopted on 1 December 2006) ADOPTION OF THE GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSELS, 2006

GUIDELINES ON OPERATIONAL INFORMATION FOR MASTERS IN CASE OF FLOODING FOR PASSENGER SHIPS CONSTRUCTED BEFORE 1 JANUARY 2014 *

SECOND ENGINEER REG III/2 NAVAL ARCHITECTURE

S0300-A6-MAN-010 CHAPTER 2 STABILITY

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 94/P SUBDIVISION AND DAMAGE STABILITY OF NEW OIL TANKERS, CHEMICAL TANKERS AND GAS CARRIERS January

RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF SEA-GOING SHIPS

Ship Stability. Ch. 8 Curves of Stability and Stability Criteria. Spring Myung-Il Roh

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 86/P EXPLANATORY NOTES TO SOLAS CONVENTION AND DIRECTIVE 2003/25/EC STABILITY AND SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS

MSC Guidelines for Review of Stability for Sailing Catamaran Small Passenger Vessels (T)

10 December 2010 GUIDANCE FOR WATERTIGHT DOORS ON PASSENGER SHIPS WHICH MAY BE OPENED DURING NAVIGATION

RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF SMALL SEA-GOING SHIPS

All IMO Members Contracting Governments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974

National Maritime Center

SHIP FORM DEFINITION The Shape of a Ship

Ship Stability September 2013 Myung-Il Roh Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering Seoul National University

OPERATIONS SEAFARER CERTIFICATION GUIDANCE NOTE SA MARITIME QUALIFICATIONS CODE

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 15 Stability. Edition October 2015 DNV GL AS

RESOLUTION MSC.429(98) (adopted on 9 June 2017) REVISED EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE SOLAS CHAPTER II-1 SUBDIVISION AND DAMAGE STABILITY REGULATIONS

RESOLUTION MSC.141(76) (adopted on 5 December 2002) REVISED MODEL TEST METHOD UNDER RESOLUTION 14 OF THE 1995 SOLAS CONFERENCE

Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS)

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 76/P STABILITY, SUBDIVISION AND FREEBOARD OF PASSENGER SHIPS ENGAGED ON DOMESTIC VOYAGES

Final KG plus twenty reasons for a rise in G

WATERTIGHT INTEGRITY. Ship is divided into watertight compartments by means of transverse and longitudinal bulkheads bulkheads.

MSC Guidelines for Review of Cargo and Miscellaneous Vessel Stability (Subchapter I)

Load lines and freeboard marks

MSC/Circular.649 International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended (Adopted on 8 June 1994)

This lesson will be confined to the special case of ships at rest in still water. Questions of motions resulting from waves are not considered at

Marine Kit 4 Marine Kit 4 Sail Smooth, Sail Safe

Small Ro/Pax Vessel Stability Study

Part 3 Pressure hull and structures Chapter 7 Stability and buoyancy

CLASS 1E 8 SMOOTH WATERS OPERATIONS 8

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION. Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 15 Stability. Edition July 2016 Amended January 2017 DNV GL AS

Definitions 13 FREE SURFACE EFFECT

Visit Us:

RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS

CASUALTY-RELATED MATTERS 1 REPORTS ON MARINE CASUALTIES AND INCIDENTS

STABILITY AND WATERTIGHT INTEGRITY

CHAPTER II-1 B. Construction subdivision and stability, machinery and electrical installations

SHIP STABILITY IN PRACTICE

IMO DEVELOPMENT OF EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR HARMONIZED SOLAS CHAPTER II-1

CERTIFICATES OF COMPETENCY IN THE MERCHANT NAVY MARINE ENGINEER OFFICER

RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS

GUIDELINES FOR VERIFICATION OF DAMAGE STABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR TANKERS

2.2.2 The righting lever GZ shall be at least 0.2 m at an angle of heel equal to or greater than 30.

ANNEX 4 ALTERNATIVE TEXT FOR OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR VERIFICATION OF DAMAGE STABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR TANKERS

Rules for Classification and Construction Additional Rules and Guidelines

ISO NON-SAILING BOATS OF LENGTH GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 6 m CALCULATION WORKSHEET No. 1 Design:

Guideline for Scope of Damage Stability Verification on new oil tankers, chemical tankers and gas carriers *)

MSC Guidelines for Review of Passenger Vessel Stability (Subchapters K & H)

STCW 1974, as amended, Regulation II: Written Assessment Syllabus for Bahamas Deck Officer Certificate of Competency:

Comparative Stability Analysis of a Frigate According to the Different Navy Rules in Waves

ANNEX 3 DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR VERIFICATION OF DAMAGE STABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR TANKERS GUIDELINES FOR VERIFICATION OF STABILITY ON TANKERS PART 1

MSC Guidelines for Review of Stability for Towing Vessels (M)

Policy for the Implementation of International Load Lines

PASSENGER VESSEL OPERATIONS AND DAMAGED STABILITY STANDARDS

RESOLUTION MSC.415(97) (adopted on 25 November 2016) AMENDMENTS TO PART B OF THE INTERNATIONAL CODE ON INTACT STABILITY, 2008 (2008 IS CODE)

MSC Guidelines for the Submission of Stability Test (Deadweight Survey or Inclining Experiment) Results

National Maritime Center

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

Safety practices related to small fishing vessel stability

Institute of Ship Design and Ship Safety

Guideline for Scope of Damage Stability Verification on new oil tankers, chemical tankers and gas carriers

International Ship Classification

Composite Document Identifying the Adoption of Amendments to the Protocol of 1988 relating to the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966

Stability Booklet (simplified) M/V Sea Breeze. 1 Ships Particulars Stability KGc-max curves according IMO Resolution A.749(18)...

OPERATIONS SEAFARER CERTIFICATION GUIDANCE NOTE SA MARITIME QUALIFICATIONS CODE. Naval Architecture

Review of regulatory framework of Damage Stability of Dry Cargo and Passenger Ships

CASUALTY-RELATED MATTERS * REPORTS ON MARINE CASUALTIES AND INCIDENTS

RESOLUTION MSC.143(77) (adopted on 5 June 2003) AMENDMENTS TO THE PROTOCOL OF 1988 RELATING TO THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON LOAD LINES, 1966

SJÖFS 2002:17. Bilaga 3 Sammanställning av de resolutioner och cirkulär som det refereras till i bilaga 1 och 2.

Chapter 2 Hydrostatics and Control

Note to Shipbuilders, shipowners, ship Managers and Masters. Summary

ANNEX 19 DRAFT ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION

PART 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

An Experimental Study of the Behaviour of Small Vessels When Run Down

Part 3 Structures, equipment Chapter 1 Design principles, design loads

RESOLUTION MEPC.64(36) adopted on 4 November 1994 GUIDELINES FOR APPROVAL OF ALTERNATIVE STRUCTURAL OR OPERATIONAL ARRANGEMENTS AS CALLED FOR IN

Stability Information Booklet. Priority Pontoon

Trim and Stability Report for M.V. Storm Warning

Numerical Modelling Of Strength For Hull Form Components Of A 700 Tonne Self-Propelled Barge Under Moment And Operational Loading

Done at Stockholm on 28 February Signed without reservation to ratification on 1 July 1996

Translation: Only the Danish version is authentic. The Danish Maritime Authority s Technical Regulation no. 2 of 3 March 1998

Institute of Ship Design and Ship Safety

IMO REVISION OF THE INTACT STABILITY CODE. Proposal of methodology of direct assessment for stability under dead ship condition. Submitted by Japan

DAMAGE STABILITY TESTS OF MODELS REPRESENTING RO-RC) FERRIES PERFORMED AT DMI

Part 3 Hull Chapter 2 General arrangement design

Tall Ships America Safety Under Sail Forum: Sailing Vessel Stability, Part 1: Basic Concepts

AMENDMENTS NO. 2/2012 to

SOUTH AFRICAN MARITIME SAFETY AUTHORITY. Marine Notice 26 of 2011

DNVGL-OS-C301 Edition January 2017

The salient features of the 27m Ocean Shuttle Catamaran Hull Designs

DESIGN PRINCIPLES, DESIGN LOADS

COFI 29 - SAFETY AT SEA IN THE FISHERIES SECTOR

FPSO Design Document. Marie C. McGraw Roberto J. Meléndez Javier A. Ramos

Part 3 Structures, equipment Chapter 1 Hull design and construction, general

RULES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF MOBILE OFFSHORE DRILLING UNITS MODU MOBILE DRILLING OFFSHORE UNITS CHAPTERS APPROACH

RAPID RESPONSE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT MOBILE OFFSHORE DRILLING UNITS

Does CSR apply to the bulk carrier with box shape which does not have bilge hopper tank and top side tank?

CERTIFICATES OF COMPETENCY IN THE MERCHANT NAVY MARINE ENGINEER OFFICER

Transcription:

ANNEX 5 IMO MARINE CASUATY AND INCIDENT REPORT DAMAGE CARDS* AND INTACT STABIITY CASUATY RECORDS Statistics of damaged ships and of intact stability casualties are important to the work of the Organization in respect to improvement of subdivision and intact stability criteria in various conventions, codes, recommendations, and guidelines. Member Governments are invited to continue to submit to the Secretariat damage data and intact stability casualty data using the format in this annex. Note * The Secretariat, while incorporating amendments to the cover and to annex 1 and 2 of the present circular, also included the amendments to MSC/Circ.224, which were approved by the Maritime Safety Committee at its fifty-ninth session (MSC 59/33 annex3) Page 1 of 6 ANNEX 5

DAMAGE CARDS Damaged Ship ength between perpendiculars* = 161,15 m Moulded breadth* B= 24,50 m Moulded depth* D= 14,0 m Height of subdivision deck = 15,50 m (to trunk-deck) Draught before damage: amidships d = 10,385m (or fore = and aft = Struck/striking: Bulkhead (or freeboard) deck I AP X1 d X D h Z X2 FP Dimension and location of damage (see sketch above) Distance from AP to centre of damage* X = Distance from baseline to lower point of damage Z = ength of damage* I = I 1 = Height of damage* h = h 1 = Area= Penetration of damage* b = b 1 = (if damage extents above bulkhead (or freeboard) deck, additional dimensions should be given for the part located below this deck, these being marked with suffix " 1 ") Dimension and location of bottom damage Distance from AP to centre of damage* X = X1 58m X2 111m Depth of damage d = 10,385m Distance from C to centre of damage = 12,1m Port or starboard? Stb: ength o damage I = Width of damage = Area = Frame 65-100 And 135-175 Second ship involved in collision (to be completed in case of collision between two ship) n/a ength between perpendiculars* = Struck /striking : Moulded breadth* B = Moulded depth* Drought before damage: amidships d = (or fore= and aft = Notes FOR DAMAGE CARD 1. Damage cards should be completed for decked, steel sea-going ships 25m. in length and over, for all breaches of the hull causing flooding of any compartments (collision, stranding, etc.) 2. The term "damaged ship" refers to the ship for which this card is being completed. 3. A sketch showing location of damage and of main traverse bulkheads would be desirable. 4. Depth D should be measured to the bulkhead deck in passenger ships and to the freeboard deck in non passenger ships (or to uppermost completed deck, if bulkhead or freeboard deck are not specified. Page 2 of 6 ANNEX 5

5. In case of collision with another ship, it is desirable to fill in damage cards for both ships. 6. All measurements should be given in metres. 7. Data marked with asterisk (*) are the most important MSC/Circ.953 Additional data to be supplied if available: 1. Wind and sea (Beaufort scale) at time of casualty: Variable NE-SE, Bft 1 2. Speed at time of impact, in knots: 3. Angle of encounter Damaged ship V1 10,7 Second ship V2 n/a 4. Did the ship to which this card refers sink? yes no If not, give draught after damage: If so, indicate time taken to sink after collision some 4 min. and manner of sinking capsizing 5. Appropriation of breached compartment(s) (e.g. machinery room, cargo hold, etc.): WB tanks stb 6. Type and quantity of cargo in damaged compartments, if any none 7. Where there any special circumstances which influenced the results of damage (e.g. open watertight doors, manholes, side scuttles, or pipes, fractures, etc.)? yes n/a No double bottom to protect the turn of the bilge / undivided WB tanks which resulted in huge amounts of water ingress within few minutes (600 t/min) 8. Position of watertight bulkheads in vicinity of damage (distance from AP to each of them) 9. Was the transverse subdivision bulkhead damaged? yes no 10. Was the collision bulkhead damaged? yes no 11. Number of compartments flooded 12. Was there a double bottom in the damaged area? yes no if so, indicate whether the inner bottom was breached yes no 13. Was there a separate penetration from the bulbous bow ye no 14. Striking ship bow geometry X1 X2 X3 n/a Y1 Y2 X3 C O I S I O N B U K H E A D Y2 Y1 Page 3 of 6 ANNEX 5

X1 X2 INTACT STABIITY CASUATY RECORD ength between perpendiculars* pp = 161,15 m Breadth moulded* B= 24,50 m Depth moulded * D= 14,0 m Draught amidships to assigned load line or subdivision line d 10,385 or fwd. aft Service conditions (light or loaded, with approximate percentage of cargo, stores, fuel and passengers) oaded (cargo=93%, bunkers 2%???, ballast= 2%, others/equipment= 3%) Type of cargo, if any gravel/stone Disposition bulk Stowage factor 1,44 t/cbm Deck cargo, if any FFP equipment Type Buckets, ROVs, container Quantity of ballast water, if any 542 mto quantity 351 mt Sea and wind condition at time of casualty: sea* calm wind, Beaufort scale 2,1 m/s Wind velocity u marginal Wind pressure pv marginal Wave length: marginal Wave height hw marginal Direction of wind related to ship's head 320 (degrees) Direction of waves related to ship's head 320 (degree) m arginal Speed of ship at time of casualty V 10,7 knots Name, length and height of enclosed superstructures and deck houses above the deck to which D was measured Bilge keels: Width (o) Depth of bar keel, if any (o) ongitudinal extent (o) Water was trapped on deck? nil if so, indicate the extent n/a Were all vulnerable openings effectively closed at time of casualty Was icing a contributory factor to casualty yes no Was the vessel under action of helm at time of casualty yes no Were any special instructions relative to this ship in existence, concerning the maintenance of stability, e.g. filling tanks, etc.? Yes (ref.: Stability Information Booklet/Vol.1- Operation of the ship Chap. 2.4.8/9 Were any voyage limits and or/weather restrictions imposed for the vessel? Not directly. For an indirect hint, see Stability Information Booklet/Vol.1 Chap. 2.1.1.3 no Were any particular circumstances related to the casualty? The vessel heeled whenever the course was changed. This and the track along the utmost right side of the fairway increased the squat effect??? considerably when coming close to Revskolten light. Give short description of casualty 1 Vessel capsized rapidly after hitting ground and massive water penetrated into the ship through the ripped bilge plating in the area of deep tank 2 and 3 on Stb. side. Page 4 of 6 ANNEX 5

Note 1 Data should be provided only if not provided otherwise General Particulars For ships in fully loaded homogenous arrival condition (with 10% stores, fuel, etc.) For ship in condition at time of loss Draught (amidships) d 10,385m Displacement* 34578,83 mt Centre of gravity above moulded base line* KG 10,124m Metacentric height (uncorrected)* GM 0,423m Distance between the traverse metacentric and centre of buoyancy BM Reduction in GM due to any free surface of liquids* 0,038m Block coefficient of fineness of displacement* δ Coefficient of fineness of midship section ß Coefficient of fineness of water plane а Height of centre of buoyancy above moulded base line KB ateral area of ships profile (including erections, etc.) exposed to wind Av Distance between centre of lateral area of ships profile exposed to wind and corresponding waterline Estimated rolling period (P-S-P) (in seconds) (o) T r Rated amplitude of roll (maximum) θ r Angle of heel for immersion of uppermost continuous deck Righting levers (GZ) based upon centre of gravity (G) corrected for any free surfaces, for the following angles of heel:* 0-0,004 10 0,077 20 0,198 30 0,277 40 0,296 50 0,235 60 0,030 70 80 90 Maximum righting lever GZm 0,300 Angle of Angle of maximum stability θ m 36,6 Angle of vanishing stability θ v ightship Displacement o = Centre of gravity above moulded baseline KGo = NOTES FOR INTACT STABIITY CASUATY RECORD Page 5 of 6 ANNEX 5

1. Casualty records to be completed for all sea going passenger ships, sea-going cargo ships of 25 meters in length and over, and sea-going fishing vessels of 15 meters in length and over, in respect of both losses of ships in cases in which dangerous heeling occurred due to unsatisfactory stability, including those cases where loss or heeling of the ship was due to shifting cargo. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. MSC/Circ.953 Depth D should be measure to the bulkhead deck in passenger ships and to the freeboard deck in non-passenger ships (or uppermost completed deck, if bulkhead or freeboard deck is not specified). The metric system should be used for all measurements. Data marked with an asterisk (*) are the most important The provision of data marked (o) is optional It is desirable to attach a sketch of statical stability curves, drawn for both the below loading conditions, using the following scale: (i) 20 mm for every 10 angle of inclination (ii) 10 mm (or 20 mm) for every 0.1 meter of righting lever. Page 6 of 6 ANNEX 5