HUDSON ROAD (RTE 27) SWEL

Similar documents
CHAPTER 8 STAKING SIGNALS AND LIGHTING FIELD GUIDE. 8.1 Staking Traffic Control Signal Systems

SCOPE Application, Design, Operations,

DESIGN CRITERIA DIVISION 4900 TRAFFIC SIGNALS

STAKING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEMS

Turning templates shall be shown on the signal plan for review during preliminary plan submittals.

PART 4 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

ADA Training Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) 2018 MnDOT

TRANSMITTAL LETTER. Revision to Publication 149, Chapter 20 (Criteria for the Design of Traffic Signal Supports) - March 2009 Edition

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

PART IV. SIGNALS A. GENERAL

VDOT 2016 Road and Bridge Standards Section Traffic Control Devices

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

Designing Traffic Signals by Jeffrey W. Buckholz, PhD, PE, PTOE A SunCam online continuing education course DESIGNING TRAFFIC SIGNALS

RE: City of Portland Request to Experiment with HAWK/Bike signal

Experience with Traffic Actuated Signals

Actuated Signal Timing Design CIVL 4162/6162

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Application Brief I-006

Preparing a Curb Ramp Project. December 15, 2010

Ohio Department of Transportation Edition of the OMUTCD It s Here!

DPS 201 RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON (RRFB)

Page 1 of 1 04/19/13 SBR

Design Considerations

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Flashing Yellow Arrow Left-Turn Signal Guidelines

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

C. Brian Shamburger, P.E., PTOE Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. State of Texas Registered Firm #928

Memorandum MAR or in part.

DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL CHAPTER 6 TRAFFIC CONTROL

Traffic Signal Design

FHWA Experimentation #4-298(E) Modified HAWK Signal and Bike Signal - Draft Report

Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Bruce Friedman and Scott Wainwright FHWA MUTCD Team

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

Arterial Traffic Analysis Actuated Signal Control

Scoping and Design Considerations for APS and ADA Curb Ramps. Adam Tyra, PE INDOT Greenfield District Traffic

INTERSECTION DESIGN. Bicycle Facility Workshop Intersections 4-1

PART 4. HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Emergency Vehicle Preemption

Introduction to Traffic Signals by Jeffrey W. Buckholz, PhD, PE, PTOE A SunCam online continuing education course INTRODUCTION TO TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

Rules of the Road Committee (RORC)

0 CITY OF SANTA ANA 0

Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

Retrofitting Urban Arterials into Complete Streets

SCOTTSDALE ROAD HAWK 2012 Spring ITE / IMSA Conference. Presenter: Phillip Kercher, City of Scottsdale

The Problem. Contributing Factors. Who is Most At Risk?

Signal Timing Design CIVL 4162/6162

Innovative Intersections

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

TABLE OF WHITE PAVEMENT LETTERS ITEM ALIGN CL STATION SIDE DESCRIPTION C RT BIKE THROUGH ARROW 1

EVERETT CHELSEA BOSTON CRESCENT AVE SPRUCE ST WASHINGTON AVE EASTERN AVE EVERETT TOWN LINE CHELSEA TOWN LINE VALE ST GERRISH AVE BROADWAY EVERETT AVE

ADA PRESENTATION (CURB RAMPS)

Designing for Pedestrian Safety. Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016

SPEED PROFILES APPROACHING A TRAFFIC SIGNAL

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SOLUTIONS ANDREA HARTH, PE, PTOE TEC ENGINEERING, INC.

STEP. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons. Safe Transportation for Every Pedestrian

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

Section 400 Signal Design. Engineering Branch

Module 3 Developing Timing Plans for Efficient Intersection Operations During Moderate Traffic Volume Conditions

City of Scotts Valley CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

City and County of San Francisco APS Safety & Access Tool. Cover Sheet. Total score = crosswalk worksheet score + intersection worksheet score

WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL PROCEDURES

Revisions to the TxDOT Guide for Determining Time Requirements for Traffic Signal Preemption at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

Walk Friendly Communities Engineering Strategies. Carl Sundstrom Walk Friendly Communities Workshop Grandview, MO June 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS 9. SYSTEM CONTROL 3. DATA COLLECTION 4. SIGNAL PHASING 10. SPECIAL OPERATIONS

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

MUTCD (HAWK) 2016 & Adapting the Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK) to Facilitate Bicycle Use. ITE-IMSA March, 2014

Chapter V TRAFFIC CONTROLS. Tewodros N.

Highway Safety Improvement

Pedestrian Timing Strategies at Large Signalized Intersections

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

The 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide: An Overview

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer

Desktop Reference for Crash Reduction Factors

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support


Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Guide Recommendations and Case Study. FHWA Safety Program.

Proposed changes to Massachusetts MUTCD Supplement

Attachment No. 4 Approved by National Committee Council

Chapter 5 5. INTERSECTIONS 5.1. INTRODUCTION

SOUTH MAIN STREET ROUTE 28

GLOSSARY CROSSWALK. CROSSING TYPES

C/CAG. Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit. San Mateo-Foster City School District JUNE 2013

Long Red, Short Green, I Got Skipped, and Why Do I Always Have To Stop Who Runs These Signals and How Do I Get Ahold Of Them?

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

Downtown Traffic Study

FIRE & LIFE SAFETY STANDARD

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. Module 8 Maintenance of Pedestrian Facilities and Alternate Pedestrian Access Routes in Work Zones

Updated There is no park access points beyond the limit of the phase I work. roadway to be constructed Viewport has been along full limits of the park

Traffic Signals. Part I

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

PART 4. HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Transcription:

C LIMIT OF WORK SHEET 25 OF HUDSON ROAD LIMIT OF P STA 12+00 STA 10+60 1. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE REFLECTORIZED 2. WHERE EISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE DIFFERENT THAN 3. ALL EISTING SIGNS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE R&S 11 ± PCC 12 ROAD PEAKHAM PROP TWO-4" NM, SCH 80 CONDUIT PCC 12 LIMIT OF PAVING STA 12+00 HUDSON ROAD PC +93.90 R=1000' L=302.5' + PRC R=400' L=44' PT + SWLL-300' 13 14 15 16 1 1 D9-2 D9-2(L) PT +78.65 17 R1- GRINNEL

12" SYCHL SEE DETAIL ON SHEET W11-2 PROP 4" NM, SCH 80 CONDUIT CONCORD ROAD PT +81.12 111 112 W11-2 + SP-3 H1-2 202 PC +84.94 20' R1-1 1 20' 1 OF 1. SEE SHEET FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL DATA. 2. REMOVE ALL EISTING TS EQUIPMENT, AND ABANDON ALL TS CONDUIT 3. EACH LOOP GROUP SHALL BE SPLICED IN SINGLE PULL BO AND WIRED TO SEPARATE CONTROLLER INPUT. 4. PULL BOES SHALL BE ADJACENT TO CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AND SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN WHEELCHAIR RAMPS. 5. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE REFLECTORIZED 6. WHERE EISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE DIFFERENT THAN 7. TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOUNDATIONS TO BE LOCATED BY STATION AND OFFSET. 8. ALL EISTING SIGNS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE R&S 9. TS POST/POLE, WITH PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON, NOT LOCATED WITHIN A PAVED SURFACE SHALL BE POSITIONED SO AS TO PROVIDE A 10" MA CLEAR REACH ZONE BETWEEN THE PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON AND THE PAVED SURFACE PER 521 CMR AND AS SHOWN IN THE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. D9-2(L) GRINNEL PROP TWO-4" NM, SCH 80 CONDUIT PROP TS POST W/PED SIGNAL HEAD W/PED PUSH BUTTON W/R10-3e(R) AND SADDLE STA PROP POWER SOURCE R1-2 H1-2 PROP TS POLE W/25' MAST ARM STA HUDSON ROAD + 1 ROAD CONCORD 12" SWCHL SWLL-350' 4' 108 PROP TS POST W/PED SIGNAL HEAD W/PED PUSH BUTTON W/R10-3e(L) AND SADDLE STA P4 R10-12 R10-12 D3-1 D3-2 D1 D3 D2 D4 109 P3 D3-1 D3-3 P1 P2 PROP TS POST W/PED SIGNAL HEAD W/PED PUSH BUTTON W/R10-3e(L) AND SADDLE STA PROP TS POST W/PED SIGNAL HEAD W/PED PUSH BUTTON W/R10-3e(L) AND SADDLE STA OLD RD 17 18 19 20 21 PT +78.65 PC +28.10 8' + 1 PT +13.08 PC +14.05 (TYP) SERVICE CONNECTION 110 PROP TWO-4" NM, SCH 80 CONDUIT SWLL-125' PROP TS 2 TYPE 2 CONTROLLER IN A TYPE 5 BASE-MOUNTED CABINET W/FOUNDATION & CONCRETE PAD STA 1 201 D3-3 R1-1 S1-1 S4-5aP R10-7 + HERITAGE R&R IN PLACE W11-2 + D9-2 D9-2(R) W11-2 (TYP) 22 PROP 4" NM, SCH 80 CONDUIT PROP CONDUIT STUB FOR TOWN HALL CONNECTION SP-2

PERM NOT USED PERM SEQUENCE & TIMING NOTES: 1. IF THE ASSIGNED RIGHT OF WAY FOR ANY TRAFFIC MOVEMENT IS TO REMAIN IN EFFECT DURING THE NET CALLED PHASE, THE SIGNAL INDICATIONS FOR THAT TRAFFIC MOVEMENT WILL NOT CHANGE DURING THE CLEARANCE INTERVAL. 2. THE RIGHT OF WAY MAY BE ASSIGNED TO ANY PHASE OR ANY COMBINATION OF NON-CONFLICTING PHASES. 3. IF CALLS EIST ON ALL PHASES, THE ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PREFERENTIAL PHASE SEQUENCE. 4. IF THE ASSIGNED RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR ANY TRAFFIC MOVEMENT IS TO CHANGE DURING THE NET CALLED PHASE, THE SIGNAL INDICATION FOR THAT MOVEMENT WILL DISPLAY THE APPROPRIATE CLEARANCE INTERVALS. SHEET 27 OF PREFERENTIAL PHASE SEQUENCE Ø1 & Ø6 Ø2 & Ø6 Ø2 & Ø5 Ø9* (PED) Ø3 & Ø8 Ø4 & Ø8 PERM PERM * UPON PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON ACTUATION NOTES: 1. AUTOMATIC FLASHING OPERATION PER 2009 M.U.T.C.D., AS AMENDED. 2. * UPON PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON ACTUATION 3. PERM = PERMISSIVE 4. Ø4 & Ø8 DUAL ENTRY 5. MAIMUM 1 = NORMAL OPERATION 6. MAIMUM 2 = NOT USED 7. STOP AND GO OPERATION FOR 24 HOURS PER DAY. FLASHING OPERATION FOR EMERGENCY ONLY. 8. DURING PEDESTRIAN INTERVAL, FDW THROUGH YELLOW OPERATION SHALL NOT BE IN EFFECT. PRE-EMPTION PHASING & PRIORITY SIGNAL HEAD DATA A B,C,E,H,J D,F G P1-P4 DETECTOR & PRIORITY D1 PRE-EMPT PHASE ASSIGNMENT 1 MOVEMENT VEHICLE PHASE ASSIGNMENT Ø2&Ø5 LIST OF MAJOR ITEMS REQUIRED HUDSON ROAD/OLD ROAD (ROUTE 27) AT CONCORD ROAD LOOP DETECTOR DATA DETECTOR NO. 1 NO. SECTION/ SIZE 2-6'20' NO. OF TURNS OPERATIONS DELAY /ET 2 SEC DELAY CALL PHASE Ø1 LOOP CONNECTION D2 D3 2 3 Ø1&Ø6 Ø3&Ø8 D4 4 Ø4 PAY ITEM QUANTITY 1 DESCRIPTION 8Ø TS 2 TYPE 2 CONTROLLER IN A TYPE 5 BASE MOUNTED CABINET INCLUDING FOUNDATION AND CONCRETE PAD TS 25' MAST ARM TYPE 2, HEAVY LOADING, STEEL, INCL. FOUNDATION TS POST STANDARD INCL. FOUNDATION SIGNAL HEAD, 3-SECTION, 12" LENSES SIGNAL HEAD, 4-SECTION, 12" LENSES 2 3 2-6'20' 2-6'20' 0 2 SEC DELAY Ø6 Ø5 (SEE NOTE 2) EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION OPERATION 1. EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION SIGNALS SHALL BE OPTICALLY TRANSMITTED BY OPTICAL EMITTERS MOUNTED IN EMERGENCY VEHICLES AND RECEIVED BY OPTICAL DETECTORS LOCATED AT THIS INTERSECTION. PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL HEAD (L.E.D.) PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON W/R10-3e(L) AND SIGN SADDLE 816.01 PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON W/R10-3e(R) AND SIGN SADDLE TYPE C, 2-CHANNEL CARD RACK LOOP DETECTOR AMPLIFIER BI-MODAL LENS ALL 12" LENS SEE NOTE 4 NOTES: 1. ALL SIGNAL HEADS SHALL BE RIGID MOUNTED. 2. ALL SIGNAL HEADS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH 5"± LOUVERED BACKPLATES. ALL BACKPLATES SHALL CONTAIN A 2" WIDE YELLOW REFLECTIVE BORDER. 3. ALL SIGNAL HEADS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH TUNNEL VISORS. 4. SIGNAL HEAD G SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH GEOMETRICALLY PROGRAMMABLE LOUVERS IN THE GREEN INDICATION, SET TO A 42 VIEW ANGLE. 5. ALL SIGNAL DISPLAYS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH L.E.D. MODULES. 4 5 6 7 2-6'20' 2-6'20' 2-6'20' 2-6'20' 0 2 SEC DELAY 0 0 Ø2 Ø3 (SEE NOTE 3) Ø8 Ø4 NOTES: 1. DELAY AND ETENSION TIMINGS SHALL BE PROGRAMMED IN THE CONTROLLER ONLY 2. LOOP GROUP 3 SHALL CALL/ETEND Ø2, THEN SWITCH TO CALL/ETEND Ø5. 3. LOOP GROUP 5 SHALL CALL/ETEND Ø3, THEN SWITCH TO CALL/ETEND Ø8. 2. PRE-EMPTION SIGNALS SHALL BE SERVICED ON A PRIORITY BASIS WITH DETECTORS D1, D2, D3 OR D4 ASSIGNED DESCENDING PRIORITIES AS FOLLOWS: (D1 HIGHEST AND D4 LOWEST) 3. IN RESPONSE TO A PRE-EMPTION SIGNAL RECEIVED AT AN INTERSECTION BY OPTICAL DETECTOR D1 (OR D2, D3, D4) THE CONTROLLER SHALL HOLD OR ADVANCE TO AND HOLD IN EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION PHASE #1 (OR #2, #3, #4) GREEN FOR A MINIMUM OF TEN (10) SECONDS OR UNTIL PRE-EMPTION SIGNAL CEASES. THE CONTROLLER SHALL THEN TIME PRE-EMPTION PHASE CLEARANCES FOR THE ASSOCIATED PHASE(S) AS SHOWN IN THE SEQUENCE AND TIMING CHART AND SERVICE SUBSEQUENT EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION PHASES AS NECESSARY. 4. MINIMUM GREEN AND NORMAL VEHICLE CLEARANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED ON PHASES THAT ARE TO BE TERMINATED BY PRE-EMPTION DEMAND. 5. PRE-EMPTION STROBE SHALL BE ILLUMINATED WHENEVER ANY EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION GREEN IS ON. 811.31 804.3 WIRE LOOP DETECTOR EMERGENCY PRE-EMPTION OPTICAL DETECTORS & DETECTOR CABLE EMERGENCY PRE-EMPTION 4 CHANNEL PHASE SELECTOR EMERGENCY PRE-EMPTION SYSTEM CHASSIS EMERGENCY PRE-EMPTION STROBE (WHITE LENS) SERVICE CONNECTION (UNDERGROUND) PULL BO-12"x12" PLUS NECESSARY DUCT, CABLE, LABOR, MISCELLANEOUS MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT TO COMPLETE THE INSTALLATION AND PROVIDE AN OPERATING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL. NM CONDUIT, SCHEDULE 40

SHEET 28 OF PROP 4" NM, SCH 80 CONDUIT R6-2R R6-2L SP-1 S1-1 OLD ROAD SP-2 R5-1 R5-1 R6-2R R6-2L SP-1 LIMIT OF PAVING STA 26+30 24 23 25 22 (TYP) S1-1 PT +64.73 26 1. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE REFLECTORIZED 2. WHERE EISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE DIFFERENT THAN 3. ALL EISTING SIGNS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE R&S 4. RETAIN ALL EISTING SIGNS

SHEET 29 OF MEET EIST PC +59.61 101 CONCORD ROAD PT LIMIT OF PAVING STA 102+45 102 103 104105 PT +76.21 PC +64.14 PC R=400' L=60' PRC 1 1 GOODMAN'S HILL ROAD 1. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE REFLECTORIZED 2. WHERE EISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE DIFFERENT THAN 3. ALL EISTING SIGNS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE R&S 4. RETAIN ALL EISTING SIGNS

1 105 PC +64.14 1 D9-2 D9-2(L) GRINNEL R1-2 ROAD CONCORD 12" SWCHL SWLL-350' 108 1 PT +13.08 D3-1 D3-3 PROP TWO-4" NM, SCH 80 CONDUIT HERITAGE SHEET 30 OF R&R TO CROSSWALK AT STA 110+95± 107 PCC +97.03 M3-3 M1-5(27) M5-2L M3-1 M1-5(27) M5-2R 1. 2. 3. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE REFLECTORIZED WHERE EISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE DIFFERENT THAN ALL EISTING SIGNS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE R&S R&R TO CROSSWALK AT STA 201+20± 106

1. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE REFLECTORIZED 2. WHERE EISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE DIFFERENT THAN 3. ALL EISTING SIGNS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE R&S SHEET 31 OF 4. RETAIN ALL EISTING SIGNS 11004.04 (TSIG).DWG Plotted on 28-Mar-2014 3:01 PM LIMIT OF PAVING STA 113+00 PROP 4" NM, SCH 80 CONDUIT CONCORD ROAD MT PLEASANT CEMETERY 112 113 PC +49.48 114 SP-3 H1-2 20' 202 PC +84.94 R1-1 M3-1 M1-5(27) M5-1R M3-3 M1-5(27) M6-2L 1 REVOLUTIONARY CEMETERY

TRAFFIC SIGN SUMMARY TRAFFIC SIGN SUMMARY (CONTINUED) SIGN SUMMARY SHEET 32 OF 11004.04 (SS).DWG 28-Mar-2014 SEE FHWA "STANDARD R1-1 30" 30" HIGHWAY SIGNS, 2004 EDITION", AS AMENDED RED WHITE WHITE 5.18 SEE FHWA "STANDARD D9-2 24" 24" HIGHWAY SIGNS, 2004 EDITION", AS AMENDED BLUE WHITE WHITE 4.00 R1-2 30"30"30" WHITE RED WHITE 2.70 D9-2(L) 24" 6" BLUE WHITE WHITE MTD 1.00 30" 30" 6.25 D9-2(R) 24" 6" BLUE WHITE WHITE MTD 1.00 24" 30" 5.00 M3-1 24" 12" 2.00 R5-1 30" 30" WHITE RED/ WHITE - 6.25 M3-3 24" 12" 2.00 R6-2L 24" 30" 5.00 M1-5(27) 24" 24" MTD 4.00 R6-2R 24" 30" MTD 5.00 M6-1(L) 21" 15" MTD 2.19 R7-1d 12" 18" WHITE RED RED 1.50 M6-1(R) 21" 15" MTD 2.19 WHITE/ R10-3e(L) 9" 15" AS PER MASSDOT WHITE BLACK/ BLACK STANDARD ORANGE MTD ON TS POST ITEM 816.01 S1-1 FLUORE- S4-5aP 30" 30" AS PER MASSDOT SCENT MTD STANDARD BLACK BLACK YELLOW/ GREEN 6.25 FLUORE- SCENT YELLOW/ GREEN BLACK BLACK WHITE/ R10-3e(R) 9" 15" AS PER MASSDOT WHITE BLACK/ BLACK STANDARD ORANGE MTD ON TS POST ITEM 816.01 YELLOW H1-2 24" 24" YELLOW - - - CLUSTER SP-1 36" 30" 4"D 4"D 1.5" 4"D 1.5" C 1.5" C 1.5" N/A ITEM 827.21 MTD 7.50 SEE FHWA "STANDARD HIGHWAY SIGNS, 2004 EDITION", AS AMENDED SP-2 36" 36" or R10-12 24" 30" WHITE BLACK/ GREEN BLACK MTD ON TS POST 5.00 SP-3 48" or 36" 36" or AS PER MASSDOT 18" 24" STANDARD 3.00 D3-1 VARIES 12" 6" TOWN SEAL (TYP) 6"/4.5" N/A GREEN WHITE WHITE ITEM 874 SEE FHWA "STANDARD W11-2 30" 30" HIGHWAY SIGNS, 2004 EDITION", AS AMENDED YELLOW BLACK BLACK 6.25 D3-2 VARIES 12" 6"/4.5" N/A GREEN WHITE WHITE ITEM 874 24" 12" YELLOW BLACK BLACK MTD 2.00 D3-3 VARIES 12" 6"/4.5" N/A GREEN WHITE WHITE ITEM 874 NOTE: HIGH INTENSITY REFLECTIVE SHEETING SHALL BE USED FOR ALL SIGNS. SEE FHWA "STANDARD HIGHWAY SIGNS, 2004 EDITION" FOR TET DIMENSIONS, AS AMENDED; THE 1977 MASSHIGHWAY DEPARTMENT CONSTRUCTION AND TRAFFIC STANDARD DETAILS, AS AMENDED, FOR SIGNS AND SUPPORTS; AND THE MASSHIGHWAY DEPARTMENT SIGN LISTINGS 1993 EDITION, AS AMENDED.