U.S. ANTI-DOPING AGENCY WHEREABOUTS POLICY

Similar documents
U.S. ANTI-DOPING AGENCY WHEREABOUTS POLICY

United States Olympic Committee National Anti-Doping Policies

Arbitration CAS 2015/A/4210 Karam Gaber v. United World Wrestling (FILA), award of 28 December 2015

THERAPEUTIC USE EXEMPTION POLICY U.S. ANTI-DOPING AGENCY. Effective JANUARY 1, (Revised June 21, 2018)

Anti-Doping Important Facts and Highlights from WADA s Athlete Guide. At-a-Glance

SOUTH AFRICAN RUGBY UNION - ANTI-DOPING REGULATIONS

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ATHLETICS FEDERATIONS

The Pakistan Cricket Board's Anti- Doping Rules

2018 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC WINTER TEAM ICE SKATING AUSTRALIA NOMINATION CRITERIA FIGURE SKATING

CYCLING CANADA NATIONAL TEAM SELECTION POLICY GENERAL CONDITIONS AND CRITERIA FOR SELECTION TO ALL NATIONAL TEAM PROGRAMS

2019 PAN AMERICAN GAMES CANADIAN KARATE TEAM SELECTION CRITERIA (INTERNAL NOMINATION PROCEDURE)

United States Rowing Association Athlete Selection Procedure WORLD ROWING CHAMPIONSHIPS September 24-October 1, 2017 Sarasota, Florida, USA

PARA-ALPINE SKIING INTERNAL NOMINATION PROCEDURES PyeongChang 2018 PARALYMPIC WINTER GAMES

Disciplinary Commission. Case No April 28, Decision of the ISU Disciplinary Commission. against. and

2016 Australian Olympic Team Equestrian Australia Nomination Criteria Jumping. 1 ME_ _1 (W2003x)

Anti-Doping. Important Facts and Highlights from WADA s Athlete Guide. At-a-Glance

6. Officials should maintain a high level of personal hygiene and should maintain a professional appearance at all times.

CYCLING CANADA XXI COMMONWEALTH GAMES TEAM SELECTION POLICY

Antidoping rules and regulations: some aspects

Cycling New Zealand Nomination Criteria for the 2018 Commonwealth Games

Nomination Guidelines Canadian Para-Alpine Ski Team

ANTI-DOPING ESSENTIALS

The International Olympic Committee Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the XXI Olympic Winter Games in Vancouver, 2010

2016 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC TEAM SWIMMING AUSTRALIA LTD NOMINATION CRITERIA SWIMMING

LEN EUROPEAN JUNIOR CHAMPIONSHIPS rd 7 th July 2019, Kazan, Russia SELECTION POLICY

2016 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC TEAM

Selection Procedures U.S. CSIO Teams

USA GYMNASTICS ATHLETE & COACH SELECTION PROCEDURES 2018 WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS Doha, Qatar Women s Artistic Gymnastics

2018 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC WINTER TEAM SKI & SNOWBOARD AUSTRALIA NOMINATION CRITERIA CROSS COUNTRY SKIING

The International Olympic Committee Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the Games of the XXXI Olympiad, in Rio de Janeiro, in 2016

Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018 (as of August 2017) 1

2014 SELECTION POLICY AND CRITERIA

2016 AIBA World Championships (Elite Women s)

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR TESTING

USCA ATHLETE/COACH CODE OF CONDUCT AGREEMENT

USA Swimming ATHLETE SELECTION PROCEDURES 2018 Junior Pan Pacific Games

MEDICAL & ANTI-DOPING REGULATIONS

2016 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC TEAM

Banbury Lawn Tennis Club. Membership Rules

FILA ANTI-DOPING REGULATIONS

BASKETBALL AUSTRALIA ANTI-DOPING POLICY

Netball Australia Anti-Doping Policy

Guidelines For Anti-Doping Testing

The selection timelines for the CH-EU-Y-D/CH-EU-J-D/ CH-EU-Ch-D Fontainebleau, FRA are as follows;

UNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN, INC. SELECTION PROCEDURES

SARU ANTI DOPING REGULATIONS

Re: Objective Evaluation of prospective Olympic Athletes of Russia

TENNIS SENIORS AUSTRALIA - SELECTION POLICY

Decision. the FIBA Disciplinary Panel established in accordance with Article 8.1 of the FIBA Internal Regulations governing Anti-Doping in the matter

SSC 2018 OLYMPIC SELECTION POLICY & PROCEDURES SHORT TRACK

ATHLETE SELECTION PROCEDURES 2017 CADET NATIONAL TEAM June 28, 2017

Policy on USTA South Carolina Junior Tournament Sanction and Scheduling

USA Swimming National Team Steering Committee Policy Manual

USRowing ATHLETE SELECTION PROCEDURES 2011 Pan American Games May 11, 2010 April 13, 2011

Athlete Selection Policy FEI Junior European Eventing Championships, 2018 CH-EU-J-CCI1*, Fontainebleau, France

National Youth Team Selection - Australian Sport Climbing Youth Team

2016 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC TEAM WRESTLING AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED NOMINATION CRITERIA

ANTI-DOPING BY-LAW OF THE AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC COMMITTEE

INAS and Anti Doping. Dr. Hossam Eldin Mostafa Chairperson Anti Doping Committee

BCAC ANTI DOPING POLICY

WORLD UNIVERSITY GAMES 2019 Swimming: 3 rd 14 th July 2019, Naples, Italy NOMINATION POLICY

Guidelines for Nomination & Selection to 2018 Australian Youth Olympic Team Buenos Aires 6-18 October 2018

LEN EUROPEAN CHAMPIONSHIPS (25m) th 8 th December 2019, Glasgow, Scotland SELECTION POLICY

ISU ANTI-DOPING PROCEDURES. to the ISU ANTI-DOPING RULES. The World Anti-Doping Code 2015

ATHLETE SELECTION PROCEDURES 2018 JUNIOR WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS TEAM November 30, 2017

TABLE TENNIS AUSTRALIA INC YOUTH OLYMPIC TEAM NOMINATION AND SELECTION CRITERIA

USA Basketball ATHLETE SELECTION PROCEDURES 2018 Youth Olympic Games (3x3 U18 Basketball) April 28, 2017

Nomination Guidelines Canadian Alpine Ski Team

HOCKEY INDIA ANTI DOPING POLICY AND REGULATIONS

1.2 Important Dates DATE DESCRIPTION LOCATION January 1 st August 31 st, 2015 Final Declaration Deadline

Date: November 1, 2017

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION ANTI-DOPING PROGRAMME ANTI-DOPING REGULATIONS & PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES

2016 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC TEAM ARCHERY AUSTRALIA NOMINATION CRITERIA ARCHERY

ON-FIELD DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES PART 1

GOLF QUEENSLAND - Selection Policy

means the Australian Karate Federation Incorporated; means Chair of the Athlete Selection Committee means the National Coaching Coordinator;

CYCLING CANADA XVIII PAN AMERICAN GAMES TEAM SELECTION POLICY

2016 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC TEAM

Nomination Guidelines Canadian Alpine Development Team

IAAF ADVISORY NOTE USE OF PERSONAL INFORMATION (ANTI-DOPING AND INTEGRITY PROGRAMMES)

Cycling New Zealand Incorporated General Selection Regulations Issued: 4 March 2019

1.3 The purpose of this policy is to select the best eligible athletes for the Olympic Winter Games.

2018 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC WINTER TEAM. Ski & Snowboard Australia NOMINATION CRITERIA SNOWBOARD CROSS

2019 FIS ALPINE WORLD JUNIOR SKI CHAMPIONSHIPS NOMINATION CRITERIA

GOLD COAST 2018 COMMONWEALTH GAMES (4 15 April 2018) NOMINATION CRITERIA

EHF REGULATIONS FOR ANTI-DOPING. Be one with us play fair

2016 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC TEAM Judo Federation of Australia Inc. ( JFA Inc. )

USA TABLE TENNIS GAMES STAFF SELECTION PROCEDURES 2020 OLYMPIC GAMES December 4, 2018

Issued Decision UK Anti-Doping and Nigel Levine

TENNIS WEST LEAGUE RULES OF COMPETITION

USA Taekwondo ATHLETE SELECTION PROCEDURES 2012 World Cup Team Taekwondo Championships October 13, 2012

GUIDELINES FOR BREATH ALCOHOL COLLECTION

2018 U19 NATIONAL TEAM SELECTION PROCEDURES

CORDOVA GOLF CLUB BY-LAWS ARTICLE I ARTICLE II

United States Olympic Committee Audit Division

5, route Suisse - P.O. Box Mies Switzerland. Founded in 1932

Provincial Championship Policy TABLE OF CONTENTS

2016 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC TEAM DIVING AUSTRALIA NOMINATION CRITERIA DIVING

Geraldton Hockey Association [Inc.] 2017 BY-LAWS

USA Archery GAMES STAFF SELECTION PROCEDURES RECURVE and COMPOUND 2019 PAN AMERICAN GAMES Last Updated: December 2017

Transcription:

U.S. ANTI-DOPING AGENCY WHEREABOUTS POLICY EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2015

Effective January 1, 2015, all Athletes 1 in the USADA Registered Testing Pool ( USADA RTP ) must comply with the whereabouts requirements in this Policy, which is consistent with the World Anti-Doping Agency ( WADA ) International Standard for Testing and Investigations ( ISTI ). 1. USADA REGISTERED TESTING POOL The USADA RTP is comprised of Athletes subject to Testing by USADA as set forth in Section 3 of the USADA Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing ( USADA Protocol ) who meet one or more of the criteria set forth in Paragraphs 1(a)-(b) of this Policy. Athletes in the USADA RTP are placed into two divisions the National Testing Pool ( NTP ) and the International Testing Pool ( ITP ). As set forth below, each division within the USADA RTP has different criteria for Athlete inclusion and different whereabouts requirements imposed on Athletes within each division. U.S. National Governing Bodies ( NGBs ) may recommend to USADA that Athletes be removed from the RTP. a. National Testing Pool The NTP may include: (1) any Athletes who are returning from retirement and who are required to return to the USADA RTP pursuant to the World Anti-Doping Code (the Code ) and ISTI; (2) certain Athletes who are serving a period of ineligibility for an anti-doping rule violation and whom USADA determines must provide whereabouts in order to facilitate Out-of-Competition Testing; or (3) any Athletes who USADA, within its sole discretion, determine shall be included in the RTP and have received notice from USADA of such inclusion. Once notified of their inclusion, Athletes remain in the NTP until they receive written notice from USADA that they have been removed from the NTP. As provided in this Policy, Athletes in the NTP are considered to be part of the USADA RTP. b. International Testing Pool The ITP may include any Athlete who meets criteria to be included in the NTP and has been notified of his or her inclusion in the ITP as well as any Athletes who are: (1) included in their respective International Federation s ( IF ) Registered Testing Pool; (2) not regular members of their NGB and are expected to compete within 6 months on a USOC team in the Olympic or Paralympic Games 2 ; (3) competing at a high level of competence or prominence in international Competition as determined by USADA in consultation with the Athlete s NGB(s) and/or IF(s); or (4) any Athlete who USADA, within its sole discretion, determines shall be included in the ITP and has received notice from USADA of such inclusion. Once notified of their inclusion, Athletes remain in the ITP until they receive written notice from USADA that they have been removed from the ITP. As provided in this Policy, Athletes in the ITP are considered to be part of the USADA RTP. 2. WHEREABOUTS OBLIGATIONS a. As part of their whereabouts obligations, all Athletes in the USADA RTP must: i. At the time of admission to the USADA RTP (whether NTP or ITP) and annually thereafter, complete the USADA online education module or an alternative education program provided or approved by USADA; 1 Capitalized and italicized terms have the meaning set forth in the Definitions Section of the World Anti-Doping Code or the International Standard for Testing and Investigations. 2 This clause is intended to cover in particular Athletes who are not regular members of a NGB (for example, professional basketball and hockey players) but who are identified by that NGB as being likely candidates for membership on the U.S. Olympic or Paralympic Team. USADA WHEREABOUTS POLICY - 2

ii. iii. iv. At the time of admission to the USADA RTP and quarterly thereafter, fully and accurately complete and timely submit their USADA Whereabouts Filing; Immediately upon learning that any information in a previously provided Whereabouts Filing is incomplete, inaccurate or has changed, communicate such changed information to USADA by updating the Whereabouts Filing or submitting a change of plan; Provide daily accessibility for Testing during the times and at the precise locations specified on the Athlete s Whereabouts Filing for the entire periods designated by the Athlete on the Athlete s Whereabouts Filing. b. Whereabouts obligations specific to ITP Athletes: In addition to the whereabouts obligations outlined in Paragraph 2(a) above, each Athlete in the ITP must also be accessible daily during the 60-minute time slot chosen by the Athlete at the precise location specified on the Athlete s Whereabouts Filing for the entire 60-minute period as provided in the ISTI. The Failure to Comply with requirements related to the 60-minute time slot may subject the Athlete to a Missed Test determination as described in Paragraph 5(b) below. ITP Athletes are further required to be available for Testing at the precise regular locations and during the precise times specified on their Whereabouts Filings. The failure by an ITP Athlete to also make him or herself available for Testing outside of their 60-minute time slot may result in a Filing Failure as described in Paragraph 5(a) below. c. Whereabouts obligation specific to NTP Athletes: Members of the NTP are not required to designate a 60-minute time slot, but are instead required to be available for Testing at the precise regular locations and during the precise times specified on their Whereabouts Filings. 3. WHEREABOUTS FILING Up to date whereabouts information that must be provided by Athletes in the USADA RTP as required by the ISTI includes: a. A complete mailing address where correspondence and notices involving anti-doping matters may be sent to the Athlete; b. An email address where correspondence and notices involving anti-doping matters may be sent to the Athlete; c. The Athlete s primary phone number; d. The name of the Athlete s NGB, if applicable; e. The name and detailed contact information for any representative designated by the Athlete and authorized to receive any correspondence on the Athlete s behalf, if applicable; f. Details of any disability that may affect the procedure to be followed in conducting a Sample Collection Session; g. Confirmation of the Athlete s consent to the sharing of his or her Whereabouts Filing and other antidoping information with other Anti-Doping Organizations; h. The Athlete s Competition schedule for the quarter, including the name and address of each location where the Athlete is scheduled to compete during the quarter and the date(s) on which the Athlete is scheduled to compete at such location(s); USADA WHEREABOUTS POLICY - 3

i. For each day during the quarter, the full address of the place where the Athlete will be residing (e.g., home, temporary lodgings, hotel, etc.); j. For each day during the quarter, the name and address of each location where the Athlete will train, work or conduct any other regular activity (e.g. school), as well as the usual time-frames for such regular activities; 3 and k. For ITP members only, for each day during the quarter, one specific 60-minute time slot between 5 a.m. and 11 p.m. each day during which the Athlete will be available and accessible for Testing at a specific location. 4. WHEREABOUTS FAILURES The failure by any Athlete in the USADA RTP to comply with USADA s whereabouts policies by failing to timely, accurately or completely provide required whereabouts information and/or for being unavailable for Testing due to inaccurate information provided on the Whereabouts Filing may result in a Filing Failure. In accordance with the ISTI, under this Policy, ITP Athletes may receive a Missed Test for failing to be at the location specified during the required 60-minute window on the Athlete s Whereabouts Filing. Pursuant to the Code and the ISTI, for all Athletes in the USADA RTP, any three Whereabouts Failures within a rolling twelve (12) month period will result in an anti-doping rule violation under Article 2.4 of the Code. Also, the fraudulent Failure to Comply with whereabouts requirements could result in an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Code Article 2.3 for evading Sample collection or Code Article 2.5 for Tampering or Attempted Tampering with any part of Doping Control. For ITP Athletes, all Whereabouts Failures declared by any Anti-Doping Organization will be combined. Therefore, for example, if an ITP Athlete received two Whereabouts Failures from USADA and one Whereabouts Failure from the Athlete s IF during a twelve (12) month period, the Athlete would be considered to have committed an anti-doping rule violation and be subject to a presumptive sanction of between one and two years Ineligibility for a first offense. 5. RESULTS MANAGEMENT When reviewing whether a Whereabouts Failure or an anti-doping rule violation has occurred based on circumstances related to an Athlete s whereabouts and/or whereabouts responsibilities and when prosecuting any Whereabouts Failure, USADA will apply the standards set forth below. a. Filing Failures i. When making a Whereabouts Filing, it is the Athlete s responsibility to ensure that he or she provides all required information accurately and in sufficient detail to enable the Athlete to be located by any Anti-Doping Organization wishing to locate the Athlete for Testing on any given day in the quarter. USADA will rely on this information in order to conduct Testing in accordance with the purpose of the Code and ISTI and expects that Athletes will be available at the specific times and locations designated on their Whereabouts Filings. Therefore, under the ISTI, the following are the ways in which Athletes in the USADA RTP may be subject to a Filing Failure: 3 The Athlete must provide sufficient information to enable a doping control officer to find the location, to gain access to the location, and to find the Athlete at the location. For example, declarations such as running in Rocky Mountain National Park are insufficient. USADA WHEREABOUTS POLICY - 4

1) For NTP Athletes: a) Failure to submit a completed Whereabouts Filing by the specified deadline; b) Failure to promptly update a Whereabouts Filing upon learning that information on the Whereabouts Filing has changed, will change or is otherwise no longer accurate; c) Providing insufficient information on a Whereabouts Filing or update to enable the Athlete to be located for Testing; and d) Failure by the Athlete to make himself/herself available for Testing due to the Athlete providing inaccurate information on his/her Whereabouts Filing. An NTP Athlete may receive a Filing Failure for each occurrence of one of the foregoing failures, subject to Paragraph 5(a)(iv)(1). 2) For ITP Athletes: a) Failure to submit a completed Whereabouts Filing by the specified deadline; b) Failure to promptly update a Whereabouts Filing upon learning that information on the Whereabouts Filing has changed, will change or is otherwise no longer accurate; c) Providing insufficient information on a Whereabouts Filing or update to enable the Athlete to be located for Testing; d) Failure to designate a daily 60-minute time slot on a Whereabouts Filing; and e) Failure by the Athlete to make himself/herself available for Testing due to the Athlete providing inaccurate information on his/her Whereabouts Filing. An ITP Athlete may receive a Filing Failure for each occurrence of one of the foregoing failures and for each month in which he or she persists in failing to submit a complete and accurate Whereabouts Filing, subject to Paragraph 5(a)(iv)(1). ii. iii. iv. If USADA suspects a Filing Failure, USADA will confirm that the Athlete is in the USADA RTP and was notified of his or her inclusion and responsibility to make Whereabouts Filings. Next, USADA will confirm that the Athlete failed to comply with the applicable whereabouts requirements set forth in Paragraphs 3(a)-(k). The Athlete will be sent initial notice of an apparent Filing Failure no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the discovery of the Filing Failure. The initial notification letter will invite the Athlete to provide an explanation to USADA, within fourteen (14) days of the date of the initial notification letter, regarding why no Whereabouts Filing was filed or why incomplete or inaccurate information was submitted. The NGB and USOC will be copied on this correspondence. 1) An Athlete shall not be held responsible for subsequent Filing Failures which occur before the Athlete is provided this initial notice. 2) After notice is received, the Athlete will be responsible for subsequent Filing Failures, including failures that relate to the same kind of conduct involved in the prior Filing Failure. USADA WHEREABOUTS POLICY - 5

v. USADA staff will review any written response received from an Athlete and conduct further investigation, if necessary, to determine whether it is appropriate to declare a Filing Failure. vi. vii. viii. ix. Provided no additional investigation is necessary, the Athlete will be sent notice of USADA s final decision within fourteen (14) days of receipt of the Athlete s response. This correspondence will be made available to the NGB, USOC, IF, WADA and any other parties with a right of appeal. 4 The Athlete may appeal USADA s decision to declare a Filing Failure to an independent administrative review panel within fourteen (14) days of the date of the final decision letter. The administrative review panel shall be comprised of three (3) individuals nominated by USADA s Board of Directors and selected by USADA s CEO who were not involved in the previous assessment of the alleged Filing Failure. Review of USADA s decision shall be based on written submittals only and shall not be considered a hearing. x. The decision of the administrative review panel shall not be binding in any subsequent hearing initiated by the Athlete to contest the determination that the Athlete has three Whereabouts Failures or has otherwise committed an anti-doping rule violation. xi. xii. xiii. Any decision by the administrative review panel and any materials submitted to the panel may be relied upon by any party in any subsequent proceeding where the alleged Whereabouts Failure or other anti-doping rule violation is at issue. The review shall be completed within fourteen (14) days of the request by the Athlete and the final decision shall be communicated to the Athlete no more than (7) days following the decision of the panel. This correspondence will be made available to the NGB, USOC, IF, WADA and any other parties with a right of appeal. At all times, USADA will make every effort to adhere to and strictly enforce the timelines set forth in Paragraphs 5(a)(iv), (vi), (vii) and (xii); however, the departure from the timelines for good cause shall not invalidate or otherwise prevent USADA from declaring a Filing Failure pursuant to the process outlined above. b. Missed Tests Under the ISTI, an Athlete may only receive a Missed Test if he or she is unavailable for Testing during his or her designated 60-minute time slot. Therefore, pursuant to this Policy and consistent with the ISTI, only ITP Athletes are subject to Missed Tests because NTP Athletes are not required to provide a 60-minute time slot with their Whereabouts Filings. The following outlines the process for how Missed Tests will be handled within the results management process. i. A Doping Control Officer ( DCO ) conducting a test attempt during the 60-minute time slot specified in the Athlete s Whereabouts Filing is required to make a reasonable effort to locate the Athlete at the location specified. If the DCO is unable to locate the Athlete, the DCO shall file an Unsuccessful Attempt Report with USADA, setting out the details of the attempted Sample collection. ii. USADA shall review the DCO s Unsuccessful Attempt Report and the Athlete s Whereabouts Filings to determine if there is a reasonable basis for calling the Athlete s unavailability a Missed Test. 4 Copies of USADA s final decision letter will be sent to the NGB and USOC at the same time it is sent to the Athlete. The letter will also be uploaded to an external secure website which may be accessed by WADA, the Athlete s IF and any other parties with a right of appeal. USADA WHEREABOUTS POLICY - 6

iii. If there is reasonable basis to consider the Athlete s unavailability a Missed Test, the Athlete will be sent initial notice of the apparent Missed Test no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the discovery of the Missed Test. The initial notification letter will invite the Athlete to provide an explanation to USADA, within fourteen (14) days of the date of the initial notification letter, as to why the Athlete was not located for Testing at the 60-minute location listed on the Athlete s Whereabouts Filings. The NGB and USOC will be copied on this correspondence. 1) An Athlete shall not be held responsible for subsequent Missed Tests which occur before the Athlete receives this initial notice. 2) After notice is received the Athlete will be responsible for subsequent Missed Tests. iv. USADA staff will review any written response received from an Athlete and conduct further investigation, if necessary, to determine whether it is appropriate to declare a Missed Test. v. Provided no additional investigation is necessary, the Athlete will be sent USADA s final decision within fourteen (14) days of receipt of the Athlete s response. This correspondence will be made available to the NGB, USOC, IF, WADA and any other parties with a right of appeal. vi. vii. viii. ix. The Athlete may appeal USADA s decision to declare a Missed Test to an independent administrative review panel within fourteen (14) days of the date of the final decision letter. The administrative review panel shall be comprised of three (3) individuals nominated by USADA s Board of Directors and selected by USADA s CEO who were not involved in the previous assessment of the alleged Missed Test. Review of USADA s decision shall be based on written submittals only and shall not be considered a hearing. The decision of the administrative review panel shall not be binding in any subsequent hearing initiated by the Athlete to contest the determination that the Athlete has three Whereabouts Failures or has otherwise committed an anti-doping rule violation. x. Any decision by the administrative review panel and any materials submitted to the panel may be relied upon by any party in any subsequent proceeding where the alleged Whereabouts Failure or other anti-doping rule violation is at issue. xi. xii. The review shall be completed within fourteen (14) days of the request by the Athlete and the final decision shall be communicated to the Athlete no more than (7) days following the decision of the panel. This correspondence will be made available to the NGB, USOC, IF, WADA and any other parties with a right of appeal. At all times, USADA will make every effort to adhere to and strictly enforce the timelines set forth in Paragraphs 5(b)(iii), (v), (vi) and (xi); however, the departure from the timelines for good cause shall not invalidate or otherwise prevent USADA from declaring a Missed Test pursuant to the process outlined above. c. Hearing No Athlete shall be disciplined for having three Whereabouts Failures within a twelve (12) month period or for providing fraudulent information in his or her Whereabouts Filings, for evading Sample collection, Tampering or any other violation of this USADA Whereabouts Policy without having been offered an opportunity to request a full evidentiary hearing in accordance with Article 8 of the Code and the requirements of the USADA Protocol and the USOC Anti-Doping Policies. USADA WHEREABOUTS POLICY - 7