Jackson Neighbourhood Profile

Similar documents
Westminster Neighbourhood Profile

Central London Neighbourhood Profile

Stoney Creek Neighbourhood Profile

Hamilton Road Neighbourhood Profile

East London Neighbourhood Profile

Fox Hollow Neighbourhood Profile

Huron Heights Neighbourhood Profile

Southcrest Neighbourhood Profile

University Of Maryland

Community Social Profile Wellesley, Wilmot and Woolwich

2011 Census Profile for Loxley CP with Stratford included as a comparison geography

Vancouver Demographic Report Victoria-Fraserview

nipigon.net Township of Nipigon 2018 Community Profile

Vancouver Demographic Report Shaughnessy/Arbutus-Ridge

Five Ways the 2016 Census Affects Marketers

REPORT OF THE ENGINEERING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION

Oakmont: Who are we?

Situational Analysis (Final)

Not For Sale. An American Profile: The United States and Its People

An Overview of the Canadian Labour Market

2018 Citizen Perspectives Survey Report

FULL PROFILE Census, 2018 Estimates with 2023 Projections Calculated using Weighted Block Centroid from Block Groups Realm Realty Lat/Lon: 3

Christian Brothers University Memphis, TN

An American Profile: The United States and Its People

A Profile of Plaistow South Big Local Area

Characteristics of the Labor Force - Poteau Area

Residential Demographic Multipliers

Texas Housing Markets: Metropolitan vs. Border Communities. September 22, 2014

WOMEN IN THE NWT - SUMMARY

Utah s Demographic Transformation

FOR LEASE HARMS ROAD INDUSTRIAL PARK Harms Road, Houston Texas 77041

GOV ER N ME NT OF BE RMUDA Cabinet Office Department of Statistics BERMUDA DIGEST OF STATISTICS

Housing Market Update Greater Moncton. Housing market intelligence you can count on

Lewisham Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment Appendix B - Lewisham The Place

TOWARDS A FAIRER ISLINGTON

Town of Whitby Official Plan Review OVERVIEW

The GRPS Cultural Landscape GRPS Office of Equity and Inclusion

Larry Kessler, Ph.D. Boyd Center for Business & Economic Research University of Tennessee

2017 Nebraska Profile

HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE STATUS American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) Picture of Lewisham 2018

By making use of SAFRIM (South African Inter-Industry Macro-Economic Model) By Jeaunes Viljoen, Conningarth Economists, 1

The Outlook for Real Estate and Residential Construction. Patrick M. Barkey, Director Bureau of Business and Economic Research University of Montana

2011 Census Snapshot: Method of Travel to work in London

Community Outreach Resource Center

In 2018 a total of 56,127 students received an ATAR, 934 fewer than in The gender balance was similar to 2017.

Labour Market Segmentation in Poland. Artur Gajdos Department of Spatial Econometrics University of Lodz

Social Development Index 2018 ( )

Christian Brothers University Memphis, TN

Issues in the Long-Term Economic Outlook for Canada

Ancestry groups in Australia: a descriptive overview

universities, which is at least an average grade of C+ in the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE).

Daniel Alonso-Soto and Hugo Ñopo

2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile

Puget Sound Regional Forecast Chris Mefford Community Attributes

More of the Same; Or now for Something Completely Different?

INTERNATIONAL STUDENT STATISTICAL SUMMARY Spring 2017 (Final)

Vision - Britain's Ocean City One of Europe's most vibrant waterfront cities where an outstanding quality of life is enjoyed by everyone

2014 Entering Freshman Survey

Portuguese, English, and. Bulgarian, English, French, or

MANITOBA'S ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY: A 2001 TO 2026 POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

Field dates: September 27 October 13, 2010

Class, ethnicity and unemployment in Britain ( )

GENDER INEQUALITY IN THE LABOR MARKET

WHERE ARE ARIZONA DEMOGRAPHICS TAKING US? HOW GROWING SLOWER, OLDER AND MORE DIVERSE AFFECTS REAL ESTATE

Studies in non-standard employment in Canada

A quick look at the construction sector

Understanding YOUR GROWTH Demographics

Figure 1a. Top 1% income share: China vs USA vs France

Re: Algae/Cyanobacteria Bloom in St. Lucie, Martin, Palm Beach and Lee Counties.

2011 Transportation Tomorrow Survey. Data Presentation

Wincanton Parish Profile 2017

2020 K Street NW, Suite 410 Washington, DC (202)

2009 Master Plan & Reexamination Report Verona, New Jersey

Europass website activity report 2014 (Iceland, Icelandic)

Population & Demographics

2017 RELIABILITY STUDY STYLE INSIGHTS

INFIELD, tutti in campo!

Economic Growth in the Trump Economy

Deerfield Beach Livability Study Area

Fast Facts: Recreational Scuba Diving and Snorkeling

College/high school median annual earnings gap,

City and Regional Residential Preference Survey Results for Toronto and Vancouver: A CLASP Final Report

PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURE. Your ad here. Sixteen Mile Sports Complex Video Scoreboard Advertising

Liberals with steady 10 point lead on Conservatives

Factors Associated with the Bicycle Commute Use of Newcomers: An analysis of the 70 largest U.S. Cities

Interview Report Form

UDI Capital Region: Growth & Change

Fishing Industry in Prince Edward Island January 2009

Motorized Transportation Trips, Employer Sponsored Transit Program and Physical Activity

The Fishing Industry in Quebec

Nevada County Population Projections 2015 to 2034

Michigan Population Trends: The School Age Population

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

2016 Census of Agriculture Results

More than half the world lives on less than $2 a day

Europass website activity report 2017 (Norway, Norwegian)

Europass website activity report 2016 (Norway, Norwegian)

HOUSING NOW TABLES Trois-Rivières CMA

KIRKWALL PROFILE May 2014

Transcription:

Jackson Profile For further information contact: John-Paul Sousa Planning Research Analyst Direct: (519) 661-2500 ext. 5989 I email: jpsousa@london.ca Page 1

Page 2

Population Characteristics & Age Distribution Jackson Total Population 1996 2001 2006 2011 25 1,635 3,575 4,745 33% Female N.A. 805 1,805 2,325 29% Male N.A. 830 1,770 2,425 37% Age Structure 1996 2001 2006 2011 0-19 N.A. 470 1,090 1,495 37% 32% 0 to 4 N.A. 205 365 380 4% 8% 5 to 9 N.A. 165 305 405 33% 9% 10 to 14 N.A. 50 245 375 53% 8% 15 to 19 N.A. 50 175 335 91% 7% 20-44 N.A. 785 1,470 1,780 21% 38% 45-64 N.A. 290 720 1,085 51% 23% 65+ N.A. 90 290 405 40% 9% Median Age N.A. N.A. N.A. 35.1 Page 3

2011 Census Male Female Total Age Cohort Breakout 0 to 4 200 175 375 7.91% 5 to 9 205 200 405 8.54% 10 to 14 195 180 375 7.91% 15 to 19 170 165 335 7.07% 20 to 24 105 115 220 4.64% 25 to 29 115 135 250 5,27% 30 to 34 185 200 385 8.12% 35 to 39 225 265 490 10.34% 40 to 44 220 215 435 9.18% 45 to 49 195 205 500 8.44% 50 to 54 135 125 260 5.49% 55 to 59 110 120 230 4.85% 60 to 64 85 100 185 3.90% 65 to 69 55 80 135 2.85% 70 to 74 55 45 100 2.11% 75 to 79 30 55 85 1.79% 80 to 84 25 20 45 0.95% 85+ 15 15 30 0.63% Total 2,325 2,415 4,740 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 to 4 5 to 9 10 to 14 15 to 19 20 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 34 35 to 39 40 to 44 45 to 49 50 to 54 55 to 59 60 to 64 65 to 69 70 to 74 75 to 79 80 to 84 85+ 1996 2001 2006 2011 Page 4

Marital Status 1996 2001 2006 2011 Single N.A. 245 545 775 42% 77% Married N.A. 855 1,845 2,300 25% 48% Common-Law N.A. 80 165 200 21% 4% Divorced N.A. 60 130 110 (-15%) 2% Separated N.A. 30 55 90 64% 2% Widowed N.A. 25 85 110 29% 2% Citizenship, Immigration 1996 2001 2006 2011 & Ethnic Identity Citizenship Canadian Citizens N.A. 1,635 3,435 4,600 34% 97% Non-Canadian Citizens Immigration Status Canadian Born Population Foreign Born Population Visible Minority Population Aboriginal Identity Population N.A. 0 140 205 (-46%) 4% N.A. 1,240 2,580 3,470 34% 73% N.A. 395 975 1,335 37% 28% N.A. 170 675 1,315 95% 28% N.A. 0 85 105 24% <1% Page 5

Family Composition 1996 2001 2006 2011 Number of Census Families N.A. 515 1,080 1,380 28% Family Size - 2 Persons N.A. 225 405 485 20% 35% Family Size - 3 Persons N.A. 125 265 325 23% 24% Family Size - 4 Persons N.A. 145 310 425 37% 32% Family Size - 5 Persons Census Family - Average Size N.A. 20 100 135 35% 10% N.A. 2.90 3.10 3.20 2011 Family Composition Family Size 5 Persons, 10% Family Size 2 Persons, 35% Family Size 4 Persons, 32% Family Size 3 Persons, 24% Page 6

Family Structure & Number of Children 1996 2001 2006 2011 Married Couples N.A. 420 910 1,350 48% Without Children N.A. 165 330 355 8% With Children N.A. 255 585 780 33% Common-Law N.A. 40 85 100 18% Without Children N.A. 15 35 60 71% With Children N.A. 25 45 45 Lone Parent Families N.A. 55 85 145 71% Female Headed N.A. 30 70 115 64% 1 Child N.A. 15 40 55 38% 2 Children N.A. 10 15 50 233% 3 Children N.A. 10 15 15 Male Headed N.A. 25 15 20 33% 1 Child N.A. 20 10 20 100% 2 Children N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 3 Children N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Page 7

Educational Attainment by Credential 1996 2001 2006 2011 No Certificate, Diploma or Degree High School Diploma or Equivalent Apprenticeship, or Trade Certificate College Certificate or Diploma University Certificate or Diploma University -Bachelor's Degree University Degree above bachelor level (M.A. or PhD) N.A. N.A. N.A. 535 11% N.A. N.A. N.A. 920 19% N.A. 95 N.A. 290 6% N.A. N.A. N.A. 930 20% N.A. N.A. N.A. 160 3% N.A. N.A. N.A. 485 10% N.A. N.A. N.A. 290 6% University Certificate or Diploma, 3% Educational Attainment by Highest Credential University Degree above Bachelors, 6% University -Bachelor's Degree, 10% No Certificate, Diploma or Degree, 11% High School Diploma, 19% College Certificate or Diploma, 20% Apprenticeship, 6% Page 8

Housing by Structure Type & Tenure Total Occupied Dwellings 1996 2001 2006 2011 N.A. 590 1,205 1,590 32% Single-Detached N.A. 515 1,070 1,335 25% 84% Semi-Detached N.A. 25 40 30 (-25%) 2% Row House N.A. 50 95 220 132% 14% Duplex N.A. 0 0 0 0% Apartment < 5 Storeys N.A. 0 0 0 0% Apartment 5 Storeys N.A. 0 0 5 100% <1% Number of Owned Dwellings N.A. 575 1,175 1,560 33% Owned as a % of Total N.A. 97% 99% 98% Number of Rented Dwellings N.A. 20 15 25 Rented as a % of Total N.A. 3% 1% 2% Average # of Rooms N.A. 6.6 7.4 7.2 Average # of Bedrooms N.A. 2.8 3.00 N.A. Average Gross Rent N.A. $794.00 $668.00 $832.00 25% Average Value of Dwelling N.A. $161,645.00 $228,294.00 $271,960.00 19% Page 9

Labour Market Indicators Total Labour Force 15 years 1996 2001 2006 2011 N.A. 925 1,875 2,585 38% Female N.A. 435 960 1,240 29% 48% Male N.A. 490 915 1,345 47% 52% Unemployment Rate N.A. 3.10% 4.00% 6.60% Female N.A. 2.30% 5.90% 4.40% Male N.A. 3.10% 2.10% 8.20% Employment Rate N.A. N.A. N.A. 67.00% Participation Rate N.A. 80% 74% 71.70% Female N.A. 73% 73% 67.80% Male N.A. 80% 74% 75.80% Labour Force by Sector Primary (Agriculture & Resources) Secondary (Construction & Manufacturing N.A. 0 0 40 100% 2% N.A. 245 165 580 252% 23% Tertiary Services N.A. 640 865 1,925 123% 76% Page 10

Income Characteristics of Economically Active Population Individual Income 1996 2001 2006 2011 Average Income N.A. $34,988.00 $41,141.00 $41,290.00 <1% Median Income N.A. $34,808.00 $38,064.00 $35,902.00 (-6%) Income by Gender Average Income Male N.A. $41,606.00 $50,448.00 $47,825.00 (-5%) Average Income - Female N.A. $28,370.00 $32,903.00 $35,040.00 6% Median Income - Male N.A. $41,131.00 $49,466.00 $46,656.00 (-6%) Median Income - Female Household Income Average Household Income Median Household Income Family Income N.A. $28,485.00 $30,954.00 $30,275.00 (-2%) N.A. $70,920.00 $87,031.00 $88,473.00 2% N.A. $72,618.00 $80,864.00 $88,591.00 10% Average Family Income N.A. $71,057.00 $90,378.00 $93,752.00 4% Median Family Income N.A. $74,378.00 $88,859.00 $91,051.00 2% Lone-Parent Families Average Family Income N.A. N.A. N.A. $57,152.00 Median Family Income N.A. N.A. N.A. $55,210.00 Data Note: Income figures based on previous reporting year (1995, 2000, 2005 & 2010). Page 11

Cnd Dollars, Adjusted for Inflation (2011) Planning Division Policy Planning & Programs City of London Jackson Profile $60,000.00 Income & Employment Trends, 1995-2010 7.00% $50,000.00 6.00% $40,000.00 5.00% 4.00% $30,000.00 3.00% $20,000.00 2.00% $10,000.00 1.00% $0.00 1995 2000 2005 2010 Average Individual Income Median Individual Income Unemployment Rate 0.00% Page 12

Labour Force by National Occupational Classification 1996 2001 2006 2011 Labour Force Management N.A. 100 135 210 56% 8% Business, Finance and Administration N.A. 190 370 435 18% 17% Natural and Applied Science Fields N.A. 100 140 155 11% 6% Health Care N.A. 110 200 235 17.5% 9% Education, Government, Social & Community Services Art, Culture, recreation and Sport Sales and Service Sector Trades, Transport and Equipment Operators Natural Resources and Agriculture Manufacturing and Utilities N.A. 50 165 325 97% 13% N.A. 0 0 30 100% 1% N.A. 170 350 535 53% 21% N.A. 115 340 340 13% N.A. 10 0 40 100% 2% N.A. 75 230 240 4% 9% Page 13

Employment Trends by Occupational Breakout, 2006-2011 Manufacturing and Utilities, 4% Natural Resources and Agriculture, 100% Sales and Service Sector, 53% Art, Culture, recreation and Sport, 100% Health Care, 18% Education, Government, Social & Community Services, 97% Natural and Applied Science Fields, 11% Business, Finance and Administration, 18% Management, 56% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Page 14

Class of Worker 1996 2001 2006 2011 As a % Employee N.A. 835 1,805 2,355 (-30%) 92% Female N.A. 405 945 1,180 Male N.A. 430 860 1,175 Self-Employed N.A. 75 115 195 70% 6% Female N.A. 15 70 60 Male N.A. 60 45 135 Employment Status 1996 2001 2006 2011 Worked Full-Time in 2010 Worked Part-Time in 2010 Active Labour Force N.A. N.A. N.A. 2,035 N.A. 84% N.A. N.A. N.A. 375 N.A. 16% Employment Status, 2010 Reference Period Worked Part-Time, 16% Worked Full-Time, 84% Page 15

Mode of Transport 1996 2001 2006 2011 to Work Automobile -As a Driver N.A. 785 1,625 2,040 26% 87% Car-Pool N.A. 30 135 190 41% 8% Public Transportation N.A. 15 25 75 200% 3% Walked or Bicycled N.A. 10 0 40 100% 2% Other Modes N.A. 0 0 10 100% <1% Median Commuting Duration N.A. N.A. N.A. 15.7min Place of Work 1996 2001 2006 2011 Worked at Home N.A. 60 80 45 (-44%) 2% Worked at a Fixed Address No Fixed Workplace Address Worked within Municipality Work in a different Municipality N.A. 730 1,635 2,130 30% 89% N.A. 115 160 230 44% 10% N.A. 570 1,505 N.A. N.A. 135 365 N.A. Worked outside Canada N.A. 10 0 0 Page 16

Mobility/Migration Status Lived at the same address 5 years ago Moved sometime with the last 5 years 1996 2001 2006 2011 N.A. 155 1,140 2,495 57% N.A. 1,270 2,070 1,920 (-7%) 43% Internal Migrants N.A. 305 345 420 22% 90% - Intra-provincial N.A. 285 305 380 - Inter-provincial N.A. 20 40 50 External Migrants N.A. 0 70 45 (-36%) 10% Lived at the same address 1 years ago Moved sometime with the last year N.A. 1,285 3,005 4,345 45% 91% N.A. 300 475 415 (-13%) 9% Internal Migrants N.A. 65 45 110 144% 100% - Intra-provincial N.A. 60 50 100 100% - Inter-provincial N.A. 10 0 0 External Migrants N.A. 0 10 0 (-100%) 0% Page 17

Place of Birth 1996 2001 2006 2011 Total Immigrant Population N.A. N.A. 975 1,335 37% 28% Place of Birth by Continent North America (US only) N.A. N.A. 30 20 (-33%) <1% Africa N.A. N.A. 115 105 (-9%) 2% Asia N.A. N.A. 220 450 105% 9% Caribbean N.A. N.A. 45 80 78% 2% Central and South America N.A. N.A. 60 170 183% 4% Europe N.A. N.A. 540 485 (-10%) 10% Recent Immigration by Continent, 2006-2011 Recent Immigrants N.A. N.A. 85 75 (-12%) 2% North America (US only) N.A. N.A. 0 N.A. Africa N.A. N.A. 20 N.A. Asia N.A. N.A. 45 N.A. Caribbean N.A. N.A. 0 N.A. Central and South America N.A. N.A. 0 N.A. Europe N.A. N.A. 10 N.A. Page 18

Immigration by Place of Birth 1996 2001 2006 2011 1. Poland N.A. N.A. N.A. 205 4% 2. Pakistan N.A. N.A. N.A. 90 2% 3. Colombia N.A. N.A. N.A. 85 2% 4. Portugal America N.A. N.A. N.A. 80 2% 5. El Salvador N.A. N.A. N.A. 65 6. United Kingdom N.A. N.A. N.A. 65 7. Trinidad & Tobago N.A. N.A. N.A. 55 1% N.A. 1% 1% Page 19

Period of Immigration 1996 2001 2006 2011 Before 1971 N.A. N.A. 200 140 (-30%) 3% 1971 to 1980 N.A. N.A. 120 125 4% 3% 1981 to 1990 N.A. N.A. 80 355 344% 7% 1991 to 2000 N.A. N.A. 55 450 536% 9% 2001 to 2011 N.A. N.A. 55 265 382% 6% Foreign Born Population by Period of Immigration 2001 to 2011 1991 to 2000 1981 to 1990 1971 to 1980 Before 1971 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Page 20

Language 1996 2001 2006 2011 Knowledge of Official Languages English Only N.A. 1,495 3,310 4,280 29% 90% French Only N.A. 0 0 10 100% <1% English and French N.A. 100 210 370 76% 8% Neither English or French N.A. 40 55 85 55% 2% Language Spoken Most Often at Home English N.A. 1,260 2,510 3,775 50% 80% French N.A. 40 25 20 (-20%) <1% Non-Official Language N.A. 430 940 660 (-30%) 14% Mother Tongue * English N.A. 1,170 2,510 3,210 28% 68% French N.A. 40 25 70 180% 1% Non-Official Language N.A. 430 940 1,330 41% 28% * Statistics Canada defines 'mother tongue' as the first language learned in childhood and still understood by the individual at the time of census reporting. Page 21

Non-Official Languages Spoken 1996 2001 2006 2011 Top 10 Reported 1. Polish N.A. N.A. N.A. 260 5% 2. Spanish N.A. N.A. N.A. 255 5% 3. Portuguese N.A. N.A. N.A. 125 3% 4. Panjabi N.A. N.A. N.A. 115 2% 5. Chinese* N.A. N.A. N.A. 110 2% 6. Arabic N.A. N.A. N.A. 100 2% 7. Tagalog N.A. N.A. N.A. 85 2% 8. Italian N.A. N.A. N.A. 65 1% 9. Vietnamese N.A. N.A. N.A. 65 1% 10. Urdu N.A. N.A. N.A. 50 1% * Refers to Cantonese and Mandarin language speakers as well as others who do not specify otherwise. Page 22

Buddhist Christian Hindu Religious Identification Anglican Baptist Catholic Orthodox Lutheran Pentecostal Presbyterian United Church Other Christian Jewish Muslim Sikh Aboriginal Spirituality 1996 2001 2006 2011 N.A. N.A. N.A. 80 2% N.A. N.A. N.A. 3,490 74% N.A. N.A. N.A. 195 4% N.A. N.A. N.A. 120 3% N.A. N.A. N.A. 2,020 43% N.A. N.A. N.A. 80 2% N.A. N.A. N.A. 35 1% N.A. N.A. N.A. 75 2% N.A. N.A. N.A. 170 4% N.A. N.A. N.A. 305 6% N.A. N.A. N.A. 500 11% N.A. N.A. N.A. 50 1% N.A. N.A. N.A. 0 0% N.A. N.A. N.A. 310 7% N.A. N.A. N.A. 45 1% N.A. N.A. N.A. 0 0% Page 23

Notes: (1) Source Data Statistics Canada. 1996-2011 Census Data, Customized Profiles. Ottawa, Canada (2) Data also derived from Statistics Canada s National Household Survey (NHS) (3) Customized Community and Profiles tabulated and compiled by the City of London s Planning Division Policy Planning and Research Section. Page 24