Art. 64 of the FIFA Disciplinary Code - new approach adopted by the FIFA Disciplinary Committee with respect to debtor clubs

Similar documents
Arbitration CAS 2006/A/1008 Rayo Vallecano de Madrid SAD v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), award of 21 August

Arbitration CAS 2016/A/4595 Al Ittihad Saudi v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), award of 21 November 2016

Panel: Mr Rui Botica Santos (Portugal), President; Mr Jehangir Baglari (Islamic Republic of Iran); Mr Raymond Hack (South Africa)

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC) judge

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CHAMBER OF THE PLAYERS STATUS COMMITTEE

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Single Judge of the Players Status Committee

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber. taken in Zurich, Switzerland, on Friday, 11 th March by the following composition:

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber. passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 22 July 2004, in the following composition: on the claim presented by

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Single Judge of the Players Status Committee

III Jornada: Seminario de Derecho del Fútbol Nacional e Internacional. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

FIFA TO THE MEMBERS OF FIFA. Limited minor exemption ("LME") Purely amateur clubs and amateur players. Circular no. 1576

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

ON-FIELD REGULATIONS SECTION THREE: PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO CATEGORY 5 GENERAL CHARGES. 2 Nothing in this Section Three shall preclude:

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

TO THE MEMBER ASSOCIATIONS OF FIFA

INTERNATIONAL RULES FOR THE CHANGE OF NATIONALITY

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

INTERNATIONAL RULES FOR THE CHANGE OF NATIONALITY

RFU REGULATION 16 ADULT WOMEN COMPETITIONS

There are separate regulations in place for the Women s Premier 15s competition (including for the Second team competition).

IRISH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL GAME PLAYER REGISTRATION REGULATIONS SEASON 2016/17

Northern Ireland Football League. Player Registration Regulations

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

IRISH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION AMATEUR GAME PLAYER REGISTRATION REGULATIONS SEASON 2018/19

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Transfer Procedure. Agreement between the player and the new club as well as between the two clubs. Player is registered for the new club.

THE FAW NATIONAL FUTSAL LEAGUE RULES

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the sub-committee of the Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC)

IRISH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION AMATEUR GAME PLAYER REGISTRATION REGULATIONS SEASON 2017/18

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Panel: Mr Mark Hovell (United Kingdom), Sole Arbitrator

MID-SUSSEX CRICKET LEAGUE CONSTITUTION 2018

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Sam Kimberley Trophy

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Rules of the. Walsall Senior Cup. 2017/18 Season. 2016/17 Winners. Walsall FC

MEMBERSHIP RULES. Each Club shall on or before 31 May in each year shall be affiliated to the Association, providing such information as required.

mai9213_ _083715_00119_1860.doc Mainland Football Regulations

ALL SPFL CLUBS SCOTTISH HIGHLAND FOOTBALL LEAGUE CLUBS SCOTTISH LOWLAND FOOTBALL LEAGUE CLUBS

REGISTRATION PROCEDURES

Book 3 Players and Officials. Chapter I. - Eligibility and National Status of Players

Panel: Mr Dirk-Reiner Martens (Germany), Sole Arbitrator

TO THE MEMBERS ASSOCIATIONS OF FIFA

NORTH WEST MEN S LEAGUE - COMPETITION RULES 2015

IV. Regulations for Transfer Between Federations

GIRL S RUGBY LEAGUE - COMPETITION RULES 2018

A2:1 The Facility Standards are focused on ensuring appropriate standards for the benefit of the Game including:

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Arbitration CAS 2014/A/3864 AFC Astra v. Laionel da Silva Ramalho & Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), award of 31 July 2015

Chamber in Resolving Disputes between Players and Clubs

Representation Contract

DRAFT. Player Movement Regulations. Contents

Arbitration CAS 2015/A/4246 S.C. FC Steaua Bucuresti & Mirel Radoi v. Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA), award of 30 March 2016

The Dispute Resolution System within the framework of FIFA

Player Name:... Address: Street Address:... Suburb:... State:... Postcode:... Contact Details: Home Phone:... Mobile:... Address:...

Player contract. between. (hereinafter called the Club) and. (hereinafter called the Player) for the period. til (ending on 30 June or 31 December)

Panel: Prof. Massimo Coccia (Italy), President; Mr Jahangir Baglari (Islamic Republic of Iran); Mrs Margarita Echeverria (Costa Rica)

Appendix A Canadian Football League Standard Player Contract

Arbitration CAS 2011/A/2628 Foolad Mobarakeh Sepahan FC v. Asian Football Confederation (AFC), award of 14 March 2012

2014 Misconduct Regulations

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Eligibility of Players

Gloucestershire RFU. Wadworth 6X League Regulations. In ALL matters the League Secretaries should be the first point of contact

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1677 Alexis Enam v. Club Al Ittihad Tripoli, award of 20 May 2009

Gloucestershire RFU Reserve League Regulations

BANGLADESH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION UK SUMMER LEAGUE RULES

West Riding County Football Association. Rules for ALL County Cup Competitions

(b) Unless the context otherwise requires, words importing the singular only shall include the plural and vice versa.

The Somerset R.F.U Knock-Out Vase Competition Regulations

December DRC Case number: Date:

UEFA CLUB FINANCIAL CONTROL BODY. Adjudicatory Chamber DECISION. in case AC-09/2015. Fotbal Club ASA 2013 Targu Mures. Composition of the chamber:

ON-FIELD DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES PART 1

LEAGUE AND LEAGUE CUP RULES FOR THE SCOTTISH WOMEN S FOOTBALL NATIONAL PERFORMANCE LEAGUES 2018 AGE GROUPS U15 S & U19 S ( THE RULES )

NATIONAL PLAYER TRANSFER REGULATIONS

ICC REGULATIONS FOR THE REVIEW OF BOWLERS REPORTED WITH SUSPECT ILLEGAL BOWLING ACTIONS

NORTHERN SUBURBS FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION INC. ASSOCIATION REGULATIONS

SECTION A &B USSA FOOTBALL NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL GAMES NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL GAMES COMPETITION RULES AND REGULATIONS

RULES OF THE BERKS & BUCKS FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION MINOR (UNDER 13) CUP COMPETITION

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1568 M. & Football Club Wil 1900 v. FIFA & Club PFC Naftex AC Bourgas, award of 24 December 2008

DMC LEISURE SAFFRON WALDEN & DISTRICT SNOOKER LEAGUE LEAGUE CONSTITUTION, GENERAL RULES AND HANDICAPS 1 AUGUST 2017

Approved by the CONCACAF Executive Committee on April 7, 2016 ELECTORAL PROCESS GUIDELINES

RULES OF THE COURT 2019 SUMMARY OF MODIFICATIONS

FFSA COMPETITION OPERATING REGULATIONS

Transcription:

TO THE MEMBER ASSOCIATIONS OF FIFA Circular no. 1628 Zurich, 9 May 2018 SG/jca/jud Art. 64 of the FIFA Disciplinary Code - new approach adopted by the FIFA Disciplinary Committee with respect to debtor clubs Dear Sir or Madam, As you are aware, one of the tasks of the FIFA Disciplinary Committee is to ensure that decisions passed by a body, a committee or an instance of FIFA or a subsequent CAS appeal decision are respected and complied with. In order to fulfil this objective, art 64 of the FIFA Disciplinary Code (hereinafter the FDO was implemented and has been applied in a consistent and systematic manner ever since. In recent years, the FIFA Disciplinary Committee has noted that a very high number of football stakeholders, mainly clubs, keep on failing to respect decisions, namely those that were passed by the Dispute Resolution Chamber or the Players' Status Committee. This tendency w as al ready addressed by granting the members of the FIFA Disciplinary Committee the competence, as from May 2017, to pass decisions individually concerning this type of case, therefore allowing the submission of a higher number of cases per year and in an expedited manner. Moreover, a new article 24bis of the Regu lations on the Status and Transfer of Players was approved by the FIFA Council in March 2018. The relevant provisions w ill come into force on 1 June 2018. The new article grants FIFA's decision-making bodies, i.e. the Players' Status Committee, the Dispute Resolution Chamber, the single judge or the DRC judge, as the case may be. powers to impose sanctions on players and clubs should a monetary decision not be complied w ith. Such possible sanctions will be part of the decision as to the substance of the dispute. Despite this, and in view of the fact that the above-mentioned new provisions will only be applicable to claims lodged as from 1 June 2018 and have a limited scope of application (i.e. debtor players or clubs), there is still a considerable number of cases that will continue to be dealt w ith by the FIFA Discipl inary Committee. In this respect, the FIFA Disciplinary Committee, in order to better address the current situation, has decided to reinforce the system and ensure that al l decisions passed by a body, a committee or an instance of FIFA are respected as soon as they are issued, w ithout necessarily requiring the intervention of the FIFA Disciplinary Committee. Federation Internationale de Football Association FIFA Strasse 20 P,Q Box 8044 Zunch Switzerland T +41 (0)432227777 1NWW.FIFAcom J

In this sense, it is to be recalled that according to art. 64 FDC: " 1. Anyone who fails to pay another person (such as a player, a coach or a club) or FIFA a sum of money in full or part, even though instructed to do so by a body, a committee or an instance of FIFA or a subsequent CAS appeal decision (financial decision), or anyone who fails to comply with another decision (non-financial decision) passed by a body, a committee or an instance of FIFA, or by CAS (subsequent appeal decision): a) will be fined for failing to comply with a decision; b) will be granted a final deadline by the judicial bodies of FIFA in which to pay the amount due or to comply with the (non-financial) decision; c) (only for clubs:) will be warned and notified that, in the case of default or failure to comply with a decision within the period stipulated, points will be deducted or relegation to a lower division ordered. A transfer ban may also be pronounced; d) (only for associations) will be warned and notified that. in the case of default or failure to comply with a decision within the period stipulated, further disciplinary measures will be imposed. An expulsion from a FIFA competition may also be pronounced. 2. If a club disregards the final time limit. the relevant association shall be requested to implement the sanctions threatened. 3. If points are deducted, they shall be proportionate to the amount owed. 4. A ban on any football-related activity may also be imposed against natural persons. [... j" A. Current procedure In this context, up until now, whenever a club was found to have infringed art. 64 of the FDC in relation to a fi nancial decision, the stan dard procedure has been as follows: 1. The FIFA Disciplinary Committee pronounced a sandion against the debtor, by means of which the latter was ordered to pay a fine and granted a fi nal period of grace to settle its debt to the creditor. In addition, the debtor club was inter alia informed that, should the payment not be made by the stipulated deadline, a point deduction would be imposed upon the creditor's request. 2. In those cases where the debtor still failed to comply with the relevant decision by the stipulated deadline, upon req uest of the cred itor, the secretariat to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee requested the debtor's association, in writing, to implement the specified point dedudion. 3. Should the relevant payment stil l not have been made by the debtor after the implementation of the aforementioned sandions, upon request of the creditor, the matter was submitted again

to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee in order to possibly order the relegation of the debtor's first team to a lower division. B. New procedure In this respect, and with the aim of establishing a system that will better ensure the respect of decisions passed by FIFA bodies and w ill ultimately induce debtor clubs to sw iftly comply w ith their financial duties towards their creditors, the FIFA Disciplinary Committee has decided to improve the abovementioned procedure. Accordingly, the main changes concern the aforementioned paragraph "2". I. Overview Under the new procedure, if a party is to be found in violation of art 64 of the FDC: 1. The FIFA Disciplinary Committee will continue to apply par. 1 a) in the same way; pronouncing a sanction against the debtor, by means of which it will inter alia be ordered to pay a fine and granted a final deadline to settle its debt to the creditor. In addition to the fine, the FIFA Disciplinary Committee will impose a point deduction and/or a transfer ban that wi ll be effective only as from expiry of the final deadline. Consequently, the debtor club will be entitled to avoid sa id additional sanctions if it settles its debt to the creditor by such final deadline. 2. Should the relevant amount due not be paid in full by the debtor by the aforementioned final deadline, the debtor's association will have the obligation to check whether the decision has been complied with by the deadline and will be required to automatically apply the point deduction and/or the ban from registering any new players, either nationally or internationally, for one or more entire and consecutive registration periods. 3. After all sporting sanctions have been fully served and if the debt has not been fully paid, the creditor may request in writing that the case be resubmitted to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee in order to possibly impose additional sanctions, up to the relegation of the debtor's first team to a lower division.

II. Implementation of the sporting sanctions under the new procedure a. Point deduction The member association concerned will be required to automatically' implement such sanction as of the first day following the expiry of the granted deadlin e, unless the debtor provides evidence to both the secretariat to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee and t he member association concerned that the amount due has been paid (i.e. proof of payment) before the expiration of the final deadline. In such case, the receipt of payment shall be confirmed by the creditor. It will not be possible to avoid the implementation of the point deduction (or to lift it, once implemented) even if the debtor complies with the decision after the expiration of the final deadline. If the point deduction is to be implemented after the last match of the relevant season in which the debtor club is participating (because the final deadline expires after such date), such sanction w ill have to be implemented in the next season. Should a member association fa il to automatically implement said sanction and provide the secretariat to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee with the relevant proof of point deduction, disciplinary proceedings - which may lead to an expulsi on from all FIFA competitions - may be opened against the association concerned. b. Transfer ban Unless the debtor demonstrates that it has paid the amount due, a transfer ban w ill be automatically implemented in the Transfer Matching System by the secretariat to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee as from the f irst day of the next registration period following the expiry of the granted deadline. The member association concerned will be required to automatically' implement such sanction at national level. In this regard, the debtor club will only be able to reg ister new players, either nationally or internationally, as of the next registration period following the complete serving of the relevant sanction. A transfer ban may be lifted both at national and international level only by the FIFA Disciplinary Committee prior to its complete serving upon t he confirmation of receipt of payment by the creditor. 1 Meaning that after the expiration of the final deadline, the member association will have to (i) commence any internal procedure that may be required to ensure a timely implementation of the sanction or, (ii) if there is no internal procedure in place, it shall implement the sanction straight away. Thus, the member association will have to act proactively as from the expiration of the final deadline, as there will no longer be any prior request from the secretariat to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee.

Should a member association fail to automatically implement said sanction at national level and provide the secretariat to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee with proof of the implementation of the transfer ban, disciplinary proceedings - which may lead to an expulsion from all FIFA competitions - may be opened against the association concerned. III. Effects of entering into a settlement agreement and/or a payment plan during the disciplinary proceedings Finally, we wish to draw your attention to the fact that the FIFA Disciplinary Committee will no longer enforce financial decisions pronounced by a body, a committee or an instance of FIFA or a subsequent CAS appeal decision should the parties reach a settlement agreement and/or a payment plan after the notification of said decision. In such cases, the conclusion of an agreement between the parties will automatically lead to the closure of disciplinary proceedings, and any claim resulting from the breach of such agreements will have to be lodged before the Players' Status Committee or Dispute Resolution Chamber, as applicable, or before the competent bodies at national or international level mutually agreed by the parties. The aforementioned procedural changes will be applied to all disciplinary cases as from 23 May 2018, regardless of the date on which the procedure was opened. We thank you for taking note of the above and for informing your affiliated stakeholders accordingly. Yours faithfully, FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE DE FOOTBALL - era1'i6n Fa'trn Secretary General cc: - FIFA Disciplinary Committee - Players' Status Committee 5