Manual Version 2017 Season Produced by: The Fish Passage Center (Last updated 2/28/2017)

Similar documents
Producedd by: The Fish Passage Center (Last updated 2/21/2013)

RE: Results of 2011 lamprey monitoring and request for guidance for 2012

Smolt Monitoring Protocol at COE Dams On the Lower Snake and Lower Columbia rivers

FISH PASSAGE CENTER 847 NE 19 th Avenue, #250, Portland, OR Phone: (503) Fax: (503) us at

Appendix M. Gas Bubble Trauma Monitoring and Data Reporting for 2007

Juvenile salmon survivals in 2017 and river conditions

847 NE 19 th Avenue, #250, Portland, OR Phone: (503) Fax: (503) us at

Weekly Report #18 18

MEMORANDUM. Larry Cassidy, NWPCC. Michele DeHart, FPC. DATE: December 5, Historical Fish Passage Data

847 NE 19 th Avenue, #250, Portland, OR Phone: (503) Fax: (503) us at

MEMORANDUM. Ron Boyce, ODFW Bob Heinith, CRITFC. Michele DeHart. DATE: November 30, Operations

Preliminary survival estimates for the passage of spring-migrating juvenile salmonids through Snake and Columbia River dams and reservoirs, 2016

Benefits of spill for juvenile fish passage at hydroelectric projects

The effects of mainstem flow, water velocity and spill on salmon and steelhead populations of the Columbia River

FISH PASSAGE CENTER 2013 ANNUAL REPORT DRAFT

Preliminary survival estimates for the passage of spring-migrating juvenile salmonids through Snake and Columbia River dams and reservoirs, 2017

Preliminary survival estimates for the passage of spring-migrating juvenile salmonids through Snake and Columbia River dams and reservoirs, 2018

Adult Sockeye survival in the Bonneville to McNary Dam Reach

Juvenile Fish Travel Time and Survival a common currency for evaluating fish passage operations

Hatchery Scientific Review Group Review and Recommendations

The following language describing the performance standards was taken from the Reasonable and Prudent Alternative Table of Actions in the 2008 BIOP:

Estimation of holdover proportion among PIT-tagged Snake River hatchery and wild fall Chinook, migration years

Timing Estimation of Juvenile Salmonid Migration at Lower Granite Dam

Survival Testing at Rocky Reach and Rock Island Dams

OXBOW FISH HATCHERY AND HELLS CANYON FISH TRAP

Gas Saturation and Sensitivity Analysis Using CRiSP

FISH PASSAGE CENTER 847 NE 19 th Avenue, #250, Portland, OR Phone: (503) Fax: (503) us at

Conditions affecting the 2011 and 2012 Fall Chinook Adult Returns to Spring Creek National Fish Hatchery.

FISH PASSAGE CENTER 847 NE 19 th Avenue, #250, Portland, OR Phone: (503) Fax: (503) us at

Transportation of Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon 2008: Final Report for the 2004 Juvenile Migration

Comparative Survival Study

Weekly Report # Fish Passage Center. June 25, 2004

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Hatchery Scientific Review Group Review and Recommendations

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE ROGUE FISH DISTRICT REPORT

FISH PASSAGE CENTER 847 NE 19 th Avenue, #250, Portland, OR Phone: (503) Fax: (503) us at

Steve Hemstrom Sr. Fisheries Biologist Chelan PUD Natural Resources Desk: Cell:

Weekly Report #13-05

MEMORANDUM. Joe Bumgarner. Michele DeHart. DATE: January 8, Tucannon River Steelhead Straying Behavior

Weekly Report #13-04 April 12, 2013

June 3, 2014 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. Stacy Horton, Policy Analyst, Washington. SUBJECT: Final 2012 Hatchery Fin Clip Report

MEMORANDUM. Joan Dukes, NPCC. Michele DeHart. DATE: August 5, Data Request

Proportion of sockeye adults passing McNary Dam during evening non-counting hours

The Columbia River Estuary half of estuary-ocean coupling: more going on than we thought

Appendix C Wenatchee Subbasin Plan

Spilling Water at Hydroelectric Projects in the Columbia and Snake Rivers How Does It Benefit Salmon?

RE: Fallback and conversion rates of adult Chinook at Lower Granite Dam ( ) (Amended)

847 NE 19 th Avenue, #250, Portland, OR Phone: (503) Fax: (503) us at

FISH PASSAGE CENTER 847 NE 19 th Avenue, #250, Portland, OR Phone: (503) Fax: (503) us at

FISH PASSAGE CENTER 847 NE 19 th Avenue, #250, Portland, OR Phone: (503) Fax: (503) us at

EFFECTS OF ZERO VERSUS NORMAL FLOW AT NIGHT ON PASSAGE OF STEELHEAD IN SUMMER AND FALL

BOGUS CREEK SALMON STUDIES 2002

Appendix F: Ecology F-5C Pile Installation Demonstration Project Analysis of Tissues of Fish Exposed to Pile Driving

Weekly Report #17 10

MEMORANDUM. Michele DeHart. DATE: August 18, RE: Update status of sub-yearling chinook passage and the determination of a 95% passage date.

LIFE HISTORY DIVERSITY AND RESILIENCE

MEMORANDUM. Ritchie Graves, NOAA. Michele DeHart. DATE: November 30, 2012

2015 Lower Cowlitz River Rotary Screw Trap (CRST) 2016 Cowlitz River Fisheries and Aquatic Science Annual Conference

COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer/Fall Chinook, Summer Steelhead, and Sockeye Annual Report. BPA Contract #

MEMORANDUM. Tom Stuart. Michele DeHart. DATE: October 29, RE: Fall Chinook Jack Count 2009

PARASITIC COPEPOD INFECTION ON SALMONID SPECIES REARING IN WILLAMETTE VALLEY RESERVOIRS

COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and Summer Steelhead Annual Report. BPA Contract #

Results of the 2015 nontidal Potomac River watershed Smallmouth Bass Young of Year Survey

BULL TROUT OPERATIONAL PLAN

Monitoring of Downstream Fish Passage at Cougar Dam in the South Fork McKenzie River, Oregon February 8, By Greg A.

Proposed 2018 Fisheries Management Measures to Support Recovery of Interior Fraser River Steelhead

Occupancy and habitat use by larval lamprey in Bonneville and The Dalles pools and overview of standard sampling methods

Proportion of adult steelhead passing Lower Granite Dam during nighttime noncounting

A report for Project ADS M.L. Keefer and C.A. Peery Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit University of Idaho, Moscow, ID

2013 WHITE SALMON CHINOOK SALMON VSP MONITORING. Jeremy Wilson Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

MEMORANDUM. July 2, Council members. Tony Grover, Fish and Wildlife Division Director SUBJECT:

Homing and Straying, Part II Mechanisms of Homing: Imprinting, Genetics, and Pheromones

Evaluation of Volitional Entry and Passage of Adult Pacific Salmonids through a Novel Fish Passage Technology

***Please Note*** April 3, Dear advisory committee members:

Handbook for the identification of yellowfin and bigeye tunas in fresh, but less than ideal condition

Final Bull Trout Genetics Monitoring Plan for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project. (FERC No. P-308) June 2017

Interactions Between Wild and Farmed Salmonids in Southern British Columbia: Pathogen Transfer

Conservation aquaculture: a critical tool for recovery of burbot in the Kootenai River

Coded Wire Tag Elimination from Management Questions

State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME

Appendix A Recommended EPA Temperature Thresholds for use in Establishing Thermal Potential and Species Life Stage Numeric Criteria

Perspectives of a State Director Selective fisheries as a tool in fisheries management and salmon recovery

COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead Annual Report

Kirt Hughes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 6 - Fish Program Manager

THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON

Smolt Enumeration Procedures Manual Prepared By: CIAA Staff Update 2011

PROJECT REPORT: The Effects of Fin Damage on the Condition of Juvenile Lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) in Hatcheries and Sea Cages.

A genetic analysis of the Summer Steelhead stock composition in the 2011 and 2012 Columbia River sport and treaty fisheries

COOK INLET AQUACULTURE ASSOCIATION Kalifornsky Beach Road Kenai, Alaska Phone: (907)

Steelhead Kelt Reconditioning and Reproductive Success Studies in the Columbia River Basin

Fish Passage Center Weekly Report #99-11 May 21, 1999

Hatchery Scientific Review Group Review and Recommendations

Attachment 1. Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND

Blue Creek Chinook Outmigration Monitoring Technical Memorandum

Screening report Serbia

Lewis River Fish Passage Program 2014 Annual Report (30-day review Draft)

Yakima River Basin Coho Reintroduction Feasibility Study

Fish Passage Center Weekly Report #99-10 May 14, 1999

IRRIGON HATCHERY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2018

North Coast Outfitters, LTD. Model SR901RT Multi-Purpose Utility Table SAFETY ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR)

Transcription:

Manual Version 2017 Season Produced by: The Fish Passage Center (Last updated 2/28/2017)

Table of Contents I. Introduction... 1 I.A. Smolt Monitoring Program Detailed Condition Monitoring Sites... 1 I.B. Target Sample Size for Condition Monitoring... 1 I.C. Data Entry... 3 I.D. Data Checking... 4 I.E. Data Transfer... 4 I.F. Data Reporting... 4 I.G. Data Storage... 4 II. Detailed Description of Salmonid Condition Sampling for SMP... 5 II.A. Injuries... 5 II.A.1. Head Injury... 6 II.A.2. Eye Injury... 6 II.A.3. Operculum Injury... 7 II.A.4. Body Injury... 7 II.A.5. Fin Injury... 8 II.B. Descaling... 9 II.B.1. Partially Descaled... 9 II.B.2. Descaled... 10 II.B.3. Descaled with Predation Marks... 10 II.C. Predation Marks... 11 II.C.1. Bird... 11 II.C.2. Fish... 12 II.C.3. Lamprey... 12 II.D. Disease/Parasites... 13 II.D.1. Fungus... 13 II.D.2. Columnaris... 13 II.D.3. Bacterial Kidney Disease (BKD)... 14 II.D.4. Parasite... 14 II.D.5. Deformity... 15 II.D.6. Other Disease... 16 II.E. Other Conditions... 17 II.E.1. Pop Eye... 17 II.E.2. Fin Hemorrhage... 17 II.E.3. Fin Inflammation (Pink Fin)... 17 II.E.4. Fin Discoloration... 18 II.E.5. Eye Hemorrhage... 18 - i -

II.F. Comments Fields... 18 II.F.1. General Comments... 18 II.F.2. Special Comments... 18 III. Detailed Description of Lamprey Condition Sampling for SMP... 19 III.A. Holding Tank Removal and Separation Procedure... 19 III.B. Anaesthetizing, Examining, and Handling of Lamprey... 19 III.C. Lamprey Condition Definitions... 20 III.D. Injuries... 20 III.D.1. Head Injury... 20 III.D.2. Eye Injury... 21 III.D.3. Body Injury... 22 III.D.4. Fin Injury... 23 III.E. Predation Marks... 23 III.E.1. Bird Predation... 23 III.E.2. Fish Predation... 24 III.F. Disease/Parasites... 24 III.F.1. Fungus... 24 III.F.2. Columnaris... 25 III.F.3. Bacterial Kidney Disease (BKD)... 25 III.F.4. Parasites... 26 III.F.5. Deformity... 26 III.F.6. Other Disease... 27 III.G. Other Conditions... 27 III.G.1. Pop Eye... 27 III.G.2. Eye Hemorrhaging... 28 III.G.3. Fin hemorrhaging... 28 III.H. Comments Fields... 28 III.H.1. General Comments... 28 III.H.2. Special Comments... 28 IV. Special Procedure for Springfield Hatchery Sockeye in 2017... 30 V. Notes... 31 - ii -

I. Introduction I.A. Smolt Monitoring Program Detailed Condition Monitoring Sites Detailed condition sampling of juvenile salmonids occurs at all FCRPS Facilities with a Juvenile Bypass System (LGR, LGS, LMN, IHR, MCN, JDA, and BON). In addition, BON, JDA, and MCN conduct condition sampling for juvenile and larval lamprey. Condition monitoring at Walla Walla District Sites (LGR, LGS, LMN, IHR, and MCN) is conducted under a separate COE condition monitoring contract. However, the condition monitoring contactor is subject to the Smolt Monitoring Program (SMP) handling permit and protocol when handling fish for condition monitoring at all Walla Walla District sites, except IHR. Condition monitoring at Portland District Sites (JDA and BON) is conducted as part of the SMP. Condition monitoring sampling occurs daily at most FCRPS sites for the entire season. The only exceptions to this are JDA and MCN where condition monitoring is every-other-day and LGS and LMN where condition monitoring is every-other-day during periods of no transportation (i.e., April). The primary role of the condition monitoring is to identify the proportion of each species of migrant juvenile salmonid and larval and juvenile lamprey (where applicable) that are descaled (salmonids only) or have significant injuries indicative of problems in fish passage at dams such as debris in fish bypass apparatus. Secondarily, the data collected on disease, predation, and other injuries will provide a relative indication of the health of fish passing at the dams. While external signs of disease may be a useful indicator of increased risk of mortality to out-migrants, these symptoms will be collected primarily to provide relative information about fish health and should not be considered definitive of overall population health until further studies are available to support that claim. Other information that will be collected as part of detailed condition sampling includes length (mm) and weight (g) data. Detailed information of fish marks (e.g., fin clips, coded wire tags, pit-tags or other external marks) will also be collected for juvenile salmonids. At transportation sites, length and weight data are necessary as part of the daily estimates of barge loading. I.B. Target Sample Size for Condition Monitoring The goal for detailed condition sampling will be to examine 100 fish of each of the species of salmonids on each date. For larval and juvenile lamprey, the goal will be to examine up to 100 ammocoetes and 100 macropthalmia on each date. Where applicable, if Brook Lamprey ammocoetes are encountered, include these individuals in the condition sample, regardless of how many ammocoetes had been sampled already. The target species of out-migrating salmonids are yearling Chinook, steelhead, sockeye, coho, and subyearling Chinook. For species with fewer than 100 fish in the 1

sample, all fish may be examined as part of detailed condition sub-sample. At Portland District COE sites, the sample size requirement remains 100 fish per species. However the need to sample every species each day is not necessary. At John Day and Bonneville dams, salmonid condition sampling will alternate each day (e.g., yearling Chinook and sockeye day 1, steelhead and coho day 2). This will reduce handling and provide adequate information on fish condition especially related to daily impacts of project passage on fish injuries. Descaling will continue to be recorded on the full sample of salmonids. In general, try to process salmonids first, but lamprey which pass through the PA chambers and are already anesthetized should be sub-sampled when possible. There are separate sorting and handling procedures for the majority of lamprey handled for condition monitoring. SMP personnel at BON, JDA, and MCN should see Section III.A and Section III.B for a more detailed discussion of these procedures. To facilitate sampling the desired number of fish of each species, the FPC32.net data entry touch screen has a tally window (red box in figures below) that displays the number of fish examined of each species/clip combination as these data are entered. A separate touch screen has been developed for BON, JDA, and MCN that facilitates condition monitoring for larval and juvenile lamprey. Fish condition touch screen for salmonid monitoring at LGR, LGS, and LMN 2

Fish condition touch screen for salmonid and lamprey monitoring at BON, JDA, and MCN It is important that fish sampled for condition monitoring are a random subsample of the fish coming through the juvenile facility. Fish examined for the condition sample should be separated as a group and then processed. Those target species appropriate for the subsample should all be examined. Fish that are not part of the condition group should not be added to the condition sample because of unusual or obvious injuries, otherwise the subsample is not representative of the overall collection. As such, the target of 100 fish per species is approximate, since all fish within a crowded sample should have equal likelihood of being sampled for condition. If desired, fish that have unusual or obvious injuries that do not make it into the condition sample can be noted in batch comments (on Catch data entry tab of the FPC32.net data entry program) so this information is not lost. I.C. Data Entry Information on all fish examined as part of the detailed condition sampling will be entered using the touch screen of the FPC32.net data entry program. Since the touch screen is part of the FPC32.net program, detailed data entry procedures are contained in the FPC32.net Procedures Manual. At a minimum, each detailed condition fish data entry requires a length (mm) measurement (fork length for salmonids) as well as species and mark information. In addition, special species codes that apply to salmonids need to be entered, such as Eroded Fin 3

steelhead (EF), Holdover fall Chinook (HO), and Lyons Ferry yearling fall Chinook (LF). Fry (FR) are NOT to be examined as part of the condition monitoring program. If a fish has no descaling, injury or disease the preceding information is all that is required prior to saving the record. Since descaling information will be collected on all fish (except lamprey) whether part of the detailed condition sample or not, non-condition sample descaling data will be entered in the FPC32.net program Catch Detail tab (see FPC32.net Procedure Manual for specific data entry instructions). I.D. Data Checking Primary method of data checking will be the Individual Fish Condition report that can be generated from the FPC32.net data entry program. Individual fish records will be reviewable to check for anomalous entries such as incorrect lengths and weights. Since there is no written record of data entry on the touch screen, validation is not possible at the individual fish record level. If anomalous weights or lengths are found, the user should delete these lengths or weights for that particular record using the Conditions tab of the FPC32 data entry program. Anomalous lengths and weights should be Deleted instead of changed. Although length is a mandatory field in the touch screen, records can be saved without lengths from the Conditions data entry tab of the FPC32.net data entry program. I.E. Data Transfer After data are checked for obvious errors, detailed condition data can be incorporated into the daily batch database (Catch Detail, Incidentals, Mark Recapture, and Transportation tabs). Details on incorporating condition data into the batch can be found in the FPC32.net Procedures Manual. Transferring batches to FPC will simultaneously transfer fish condition data. I.F. Data Reporting Data will be reported via the FPC website and FPC weekly reports as well as site reports. Individual fish records will be made available to the sites for reporting to the COE to support transportation programs as well as condition monitoring. I.G. Data Storage FPC will store data in an SQL database. Sites may also maintain a database as part of contract obligations to COE. 4

II. Detailed Description of Salmonid Condition Sampling for SMP Standardized descriptive categories were developed to provide a meaningful way of comparing the injury and disease data among Smolt Monitoring Program sites. All COE operated SMP sites will be conducting salmonid condition monitoring in 2015. Overall there are five categories for the various fish conditions: (1) Injury, (2) Descaling, (3) Predator Marks, (4) Disease/Parasites, and (5) Other Conditions. Within each category there are several subcategories for particular conditions (see table below). Since the data will be entered based on the sub-category in which each condition occurs, this protocol is intended to provide detailed descriptions of each sub-category. Condition data will be recorded for each individual fish. A single fish could have multiple conditions, either in the same category or between several categories. For example, a fish could have two different injures like a body injury and a head injury. Or, a single fish could have an injury (e.g., operculum injury) and a disease (e.g., fungus). Injuries Head Injury Eye Injury Operculum Injury Body Injury Fin Injury Descaling Partial Descaling Descaled Descaled with Predator Marks Predation Marks Disease/ Parasite Other Conditions Bird Fish Lamprey Fungus Columnaris BKD Parasite Deformity Other Disease/Para Pop Eye Eye Hemorrhage Fin Hemorrhage Pink Fin Fin Discoloration II.A. Injuries The injuries category contains conditions that are considered injuries that are often attributed to dam operations. This condition category includes injuries to the head, body, and fins. In addition, since injury information will be used to determine the potential effects of the dam at which monitoring is occurring, obviously old (i.e., likely not to have occurred at the dam where fish is being examined) should not be recorded as injured in the injury categories below. Information about such fish could be written in an injury comment field so that data is not lost but also is not counted as part of routine data summarization. If sites wish to record additional or supplemental information on injuries encountered, they may do this by entering this information into the General Comments field. 5

II.A.1. Head Injury The head is defined as that portion of the fish anterior to the rear margin of the operculum. A head injury is considered any cut, abrasion, laceration, swelling, hemorrhaging, or other injury to the head but NOT found on the eye or operculum. Head injuries should only be those injuries that are NOT attributable to a disease, predator mark, or parasite to the head. II.A.2. Eye Injury Any injury (not associated with predation marks or disease) to an eye (or eyes). This includes lacerations, abrasions or clouded tissue or large amounts of blood in the eye indicative of an injury. This also includes missing eyes. Note: Pop Eye and Eye Hemorrhage are NOT included in this subcategory. Instead, they are included in the Other Conditions category. See Section II.E.1 for a detailed explanation of Pop Eye and Section II.E.5 for a detailed explanation of Eye Hemorrhage. 6

II.A.3. Operculum Injury Any cuts, tears, or missing portions of operculum that are NOT obvious deformities such as shortened operculum or disease related injuries and not associated with predation marks. II.A.4. Body Injury The body is defined as that area of the fish NOT including head or fins. A body injury is considered any cut, abrasion, laceration, swelling, hemorrhaging, or other injury to the body. Body injuries are only those injuries to the body that are NOT attributed to a disease, parasite, or predators. 7

II.A.5. Fin Injury The fin is defined as those appendages or extensions of tissue on the fish including fin rays and thin often transparent or membranous tissue between fin rays, not included as part of head or body. A fin injury is considered any cut, abrasion, laceration, swelling, or other injury to the fins. Fin injuries are only those injuries to the fin that are NOT attributed to disease, parasites, or predation. Also, this subcategory does NOT include other conditions associated to the fins such as fin hemorrhaging, fin discoloration, and/or fin inflammation (i.e., fin pinkness). These conditions are in a separate subcategory under Other Conditions (see Section II.E below). Split fins should only be reported as an injury when the split reaches from the outer margin of the fin to where the fin meets the body. 8

II.B. Descaling Only smolts greater than 60mm will be examined for descaling. II.B.1. Partially Descaled A partially descaled fish is a fish with more than slight descaling (slight descaling is defined as a low percentage 2% 5% that is above a background level that would be considered non-descaled), but not up to the FTOT 20% descaling rate to be considered descaled. 9

II.B.2. Descaled A descaled fish is a fish that is considered descaled under the FTOT standard of 20%. This includes fish with descaling from 20% to 100% of at least one side of its body. This does not include fish that are descaled and have obvious signs of an encounter with a predator. II.B.3. Descaled with Predation Marks This category includes a fish that is descaled (i.e., under FTOT criteria of 20% on at least one site) and has signs of predator marks. It is not necessary to determine whether or not observed descaling was caused by a predator, only that the fish is descaled AND that predation marks are also present. Please note: the type of predation mark should also be recorded via the predator mark category (see Section II.C below). 10

II.C. Predation Marks II.C.1. Bird Marks on fish consistent with bird bite. This typically appears as a line along the fish s body, often followed by scratches or descaled areas. Bird bites are often symmetrical and found on both sides of the fish s body. 11

II.C.2. Fish Bite marks have clear curvature, as if inflicted by a fish (i.e., jaw curvature). II.C.3. Lamprey Marks on fish consistent with lamprey bite. This typically appears as a puncture wound on the body surrounded by a circular region of descaling and smaller puncture wounds. 12

II.D. Disease/Parasites II.D.1. Fungus Fungus present on any portion of the fish. Often found in association with old injuries. II.D.2. Columnaris The disease Columnaris is caused by the bacterium Flavobacterium columnare and is associated with summer and fall migrants because it becomes more virulent when water temperatures exceed 15.5 C. Symptoms include: a loss of protective skin tissue at the snout and yellowing blemishes without broken skin or yellow to orange lesions and/or ulcers on the surface of the body. Secondary fungal infections are common on these body lesions. 13

II.D.3. Bacterial Kidney Disease (BKD) The primary symptom of BKD is bloating of body. Secondary symptoms of BKD include dark coloration and Pop Eye. BKD should be considered when the primary symptom of bloating is observed OR when multiple secondary symptoms are observed. Multiple secondary symptoms must be observed because Pop Eye by its-self may be related to other forms of trauma and not BKD. II.D.4. Parasite Includes any parasite that is visibly attached on the external surface of the fish or that is visibly protruding from gills or mouth. Examples of parasites include leaches, copepods, trematodes, black spot, attached lamprey, etc. If sites wish to record the type of parasite seen, they may do this by entering this information into the General Comments or Special Comments field. 14

II.D.5. Deformity A body deformity is any noticeable spinal curvature or other obvious deformity to the body. This includes such deformities as genetic deformities (i.e., fins in wrong places), operculum deformities (e.g., short operculum), etc. 15

II.D.6. Other Disease Any other disease not mentioned above. Some examples of other diseases may include: cysts, trematodes, Ichthyopthirius sp.( ich ), etc. As with the parasites, if sites wish to record what the Other disease is, they may do this by entering this information into the General Comments or Special Comments fields. 16

II.E. Other Conditions II.E.1. Pop Eye Eye or eyes bulging out unusually. A fish should only be recorded as having Pop Eye when NO other symptoms of BKD are present. II.E.2. Fin Hemorrhage Any red fluid in clear tissues of fin (outside capillaries and blood vessels). II.E.3. Fin Inflammation (Pink Fin) Pink or red coloration at base of fin or fins indicative of unknown irritant (internal inflammation/injury) or possibly asphyxiation due to anesthetization or other cause. Note: this is not recorded as fin injury and differs from hemorrhage because blood vessels are not ruptured so that no blood has pooled in the tissue between fin rays as seen above. 17

II.E.4. Fin Discoloration Fin appears discolored, often a lack of pigment along interior portion of fin. II.E.5. Eye Hemorrhage Eye has blood in tissues but no other apparent damage to the eye or surrounding tissues. II.F. Comments Fields II.F.1. General Comments This field allows the user to enter any general comments about the individual fish they wish to record. Up to two comments are possible in this field, which are to be separated by a semicolon. II.F.2. Special Comments This field allows the user to enter any special comments that the user wishes to be encompassed into their on-site databases. The intention is that these comments will be two-letter codes for specific conditions that site wishes to track, in addition to what is currently on the touch screen. As with the general comments, up to two comments can be entered into this field. These two comments should be separated by a semicolon. 18

III. Detailed Description of Lamprey Condition Sampling for SMP III.A. Holding Tank Removal and Separation Procedure At the end of each sample day (0700 hrs.), juvenile lamprey should be removed from the holding tank, if possible, before the start of sampling smolts. All juvenile lamprey specimens caught in the general SMP sample holding tank are identified to species, life stage, and counted (including dead fish). Fish to be examined for condition should be placed in buckets of fresh river water and quickly transferred into a temporary holding tank (where applicable). Because it is difficult to capture and remove all lamprey without disturbing holding conditions for juvenile salmonids, some juvenile lamprey will remain in the holding tank. These lamprey can be anesthetized and sorted with smolts. After at least 100 of each life-stage of lamprey are randomly selected from the sample holding tank, any extra lamprey can be immediately identified, counted, and released to the tailrace as part of the normal SMP sampling activities (i.e., non-condition fish). III.B. Anaesthetizing, Examining, and Handling of Lamprey After processing smolts for the day, transfer a workable number of lamprey from the temporary holding tank and place them into the sorting trough for anesthetizing. Based on 2011 sampling, the SMP personnel at JDA found a workable number of lamprey to be about 40 individuals. A concentration of about 48mg/L of MS-222 should be sufficient to anesthetize lamprey within 4 minutes, although some fish may be calm enough to begin the examination after about 3 minutes. In 2011 at JDA, individual fish examinations ranged from 13 to 22 seconds, but averaged about 15 seconds per fish. After the examination and data input, lamprey are placed in recovery tanks for at least 30 minutes prior to being released through normal exit routes to the tailrace. This process is repeated until all lamprey are processed. Data collection for larval and juvenile lamprey should follow the same basic pattern as with juvenile salmonids. In addition to collecting basic condition data, the FPC asks that site personnel photograph specimens with maladies or characteristics that may warrant clarification or would be suitable for future training. 19

III.C. Lamprey Condition Definitions For larval and juvenile lamprey, there are four main categories for the various conditions: (1) Injuries, (2) Predation marks, (3) Disease/Parasite, and (4) Other Conditions. Descaling is not part of the monitoring protocol for larval and juvenile lamprey, as they do not have scales. Within each category there are several subcategories for particular conditions (see table below). Since the data will be entered based on the sub-category in which each condition occurs, this protocol is intended to provide detailed descriptions of each sub-category. Condition data will be recorded for each individual fish. A single fish could have multiple conditions, either in the same category or between several categories. For example, a fish could have two different injures like a body injury and a head injury. Or, a single fish could have an injury (e.g., fin injury) and a disease (e.g., fungus). Injuries Head Injury Eye Injury Body Injury Fin Injury Predation Marks Disease/Parasite Other Conditions Bird Fish Fungus Columnaris BKD Parasites Deformity Other Disease/Para Pop Eye Eye hemorrhage Fin hemorrhage Note: There are certain conditions that are part of the salmonid monitoring are not outlined in the larval and juvenile lamprey monitoring because they do not pertain to lamprey. These conditions include: (1) operculum injury, (2) all descaling, (3) lamprey predation, (4) pink fin, and (5) fin discoloration. III.D. Injuries The injuries category contains conditions that are often attributed to bypass systems and dam operations. This condition category includes injuries to the head, eyes, body, and fins. In addition, since injury information will be used to determine the potential effects of the dam at which monitoring is occurring, obviously old injuries (i.e., likely not to have occurred at the dam where fish is being examined) should not be recorded. Injuries that are clearly identifiable as old should not be recorded. Injuries determined to be older may be recorded in the injury comment field so those data are not lost but also are not counted as part of routine data summarization. If sites wish to record additional or supplemental information on injuries encountered, they may do this by entering this information into the General Comments field. III.D.1. Head Injury Head injuries are defined as that portion of the fish anterior to the last gill opening. A head injury is considered any cut, abrasion, laceration, swelling, or other injury to the head. Head injuries should include those to the gill openings themselves. Head injuries should only be those injuries that are not confidently attributable to a disease, parasites, or predators. 20

III.D.2. Eye Injury An eye injury is any injury to one or both of the eyes. This includes lacerations, abrasions or clouded tissue, or large amounts of blood accompanied by out of place tissue indicative of a severe impact. Presence of blood in the eye without evidence of tissue damage is NOT considered an eye injury (see Section III.G.2) Note: Pop Eye and Eye Hemorrhage are NOT included in this subcategory. Instead, they are included in the Other Conditions category. See Section III.G.1 for a detailed explanation of Pop Eye and Section III.G.2 for a detailed explanation of Eye Hemorrhage. 21

III.D.3. Body Injury Body injuries are defined as any injury not on the head or fins. A body injury is considered any cut, abrasion, laceration, swelling, or other injury to the body. This includes hemorrhaging to the body. Body injuries are only those injuries to the body that are not attributed to a disease, parasites, or predators. 22

III.D.4. Fin Injury Fins are defined as those appendages or extensions of tissue on the dorsal and posterior end of the juvenile lamprey. A fin injury is considered any cut, abrasion, laceration, swelling, or other injury to the fins. Fin injuries are only those injuries to the fin that are not attributed to disease, parasites, or predation. Also, this subcategory does not include other conditions associated with the fins such as fin hemorrhaging. Split fins should only be reported as an injury when the split reaches from the outer margin of the fin to where the fin meets the body. III.E. Predation Marks III.E.1. Bird Predation Marks on fish consistent with bird bites. This typically appears as a line along the fish s body, often followed by scratches. Bird bites are often somewhat symmetrical and found on both sides of the fish s body. Note: When applicable, please take pictures of Bird Marks versus Body Injuries and share them with the FPC and USFWS as you progress through the season. In 23

particular, we would like to receive good examples of a symmetrical nature of bird marks (i.e., both sides). III.E.2. Fish Predation Bite marks have clear curvature, as if inflicted by a fish mouth (i.e., jaw curvature). These marks may be difficult to discern on juvenile lamprey due to their thin body. Mouth marks can be smooth, accompanied by tooth punctures, or scrapes. Note: Representative picture for lamprey juvenile not available. Fish predation marks on salmonid smolt provided for comparison purposes. III.F. Disease/Parasites III.F.1. Fungus Fungus present on any portion of the fish. Light grey, cotton-like substance often flaking and filamentous, often found in association with other injuries. 24

III.F.2. Columnaris In salmonids, the disease Columnaris is caused by the bacterium Flavobacterium columnare and is associated with summer and fall migrants because it becomes more virulent when water temperatures exceed 15.5 C. Symptoms include: a loss of protective skin tissue at the snout and yellowing blemishes without broken skin or yellow to orange lesions and/or ulcers on the surface of the body. Secondary fungal infections are common on these body lesions. It is unknown what the symptoms of Columnaris are in larval and juvenile lamprey. III.F.3. Bacterial Kidney Disease (BKD) In salmonids, the primary symptom of BKD in juvenile salmonids is characterized by bloating of the body, but it is unknown if juvenile lamprey exhibit similar symptoms. Secondary symptoms of BKD can include dark coloration and Pop Eye. It is unknown what the symptoms of BKD are in larval and juvenile lamprey. Note: Representative picture for lamprey juvenile not available. BKD symptoms on salmonid smolts provided for comparison purposes. 25

III.F.4. Parasites This category includes any parasite that is visibly attached on the external surface of the lamprey or one that is visibly protruding from the gill openings or mouth. Examples of potential parasites include leeches, copepods, and trematodes. If sites wish to record the type of parasite seen, they may do this by entering this information into the General Comments or Special Comments field. Note: Representative picture for lamprey juvenile not available. Parasite commonly found on salmonid smolts provided for comparison purposes. III.F.5. Deformity A body deformity (those not associated with healed injuries) can include stunted or abnormal growth, missing eyes, or misshapen eyes, head, or fins. 26

III.F.6. Other Disease Any other disease not mentioned above. Some examples of other diseases may include: cysts, Digenia, etc. As with the parasites, if sites wish to record what the Other disease is, they may do this by entering this information into the General Comments or Special Comments fields. Note: Representative picture for lamprey juvenile not available. Other diseases found on salmonid smolts provided for comparison purposes. III.G. Other Conditions III.G.1. Pop Eye Eye or eyes bulging out unusually. A fish should only be recorded as having Pop Eye when no other symptoms of BKD are present. 27

III.G.2. Eye Hemorrhaging Any blood on the inside or in the tissues around the eye, but no other apparent damage to the eye or surrounding area. III.G.3. Fin hemorrhaging Any blood observed in clear tissues of fin outside capillaries and blood vessels. III.H. Comments Fields III.H.1. General Comments This field allows the user to enter any general comments about the individual fish they wish to record. Up to two comments are possible in this field, which are to be separated by a semicolon. III.H.2. Special Comments This field allows the user to enter any special comments that the user wishes to be encompassed into their on-site databases. The intention is that these comments will be two-letter codes for specific conditions that site wishes to track, in addition to what is currently on the touch screen. As with the general comments, up to two comments can be entered into this field. These two comments should be separated by a semicolon. 28

Note: When possible, USFWS and FPC ask that crews at MCN, JDA, and BON use Special Comments field to indicate uncertain injuries for lamprey juveniles. If uncertain, enter the injury and then enter UI in Special Comment field. Also, take a picture if possible and let FPC staff know when this occurs. 29

IV. Special Procedure for Springfield Hatchery Sockeye in 2017 In 2016, hatchery sockeye encountered at Snake River bypass facilities exhibited high incidences of injuries (LGR and LMN) or disease (LGS). Upon further review of the data, and discussions with SMP staff, it appears that personnel at these three sites were likely observing the same conditions but recording them differently as either injured or diseased. Later pathology examinations revealed no signs of disease. Furthermore, Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) personnel determined that sockeye from the Springfield Hatchery release were released in poor shape, likely as a result of loading into the trucks and/or transport to the release site. Given that no disease was present in these fish, Injury would have been more appropriate designation for fish exhibiting these signs. IDFG has made changes to their release strategies for 2017 but it is possible condition monitoring personnel may encounter sockeye in similar condition in 2017. We have requested that IDFG conduct a condition assessment upon release and inform FPC of any physical signs that were observed that might indicate that the fish are in poor condition. Assuming we get indication that the 2017 hatchery sockeye release is in poor condition, ALL sites should enter a General Comment of SH for all injured and/or diseased sockeye juveniles that exhibit signs indicative of this release (as indicated by IDFG assessment at release). If the fish exhibits multiple injuries and/or diseases, please specify which injury and/or disease the SH code corresponds to (e.g., SH fin or SH body). FPC will continue to estimate injury rates as before but SH code allows for identification of injuries that may be due to confirmed issues with rearing and/or release strategies, if they occur in 2017. 30

V. Notes 31

32

33