GWINNETT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Similar documents
FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

BI-DIRECTIONALS FREE-ACCESS

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Driveway Design Criteria

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

Geometric Design Tables

Public Information Meeting. Orange Camp Road. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway to I-4. Presented by: Volusia County August 2, 2018

Roadway Design Manual

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Fleur Drive Reconstruction

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Staff Report Text Amendment Case #: TA

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Access Management Standards

3-13 UFC - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN FOR ROADS, STREETS, WALKS, AND OPEN

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

LARIMER COUNTY: ENGINEERING DOUGLAS ROAD (CR 54)

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

SECTION 14: LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017

T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S

SECTION 3.00 STREETS, DRIVEWAYS, AND PARKING LOTS SUB-INDEX

5.0 ROADWAY DESIGN 5.1 INTRODUCTION

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

BPP / SUB

City of Turlock Traffic Calming Program

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

ACHD Board of Commissioners Stacey Yarrington, Planner III Tandem Ridge/ EPP / PP-07-16/ RZ-12-16/ CPA-01-16/ A-07-16

Provides an extension of a road to the subdivision boundary or parcel to facilitate the continuity of possible adjacent development.

Introduction to Roadway Design

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

MOBILE COUNTY COMMISSION DESIGN GUIDELINES for Improving. Existing County Maintained Unpaved Local Roads

Revisions to Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (2016 Update)

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

Central Arkansas Regional Transportation Study Area ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS And Implementation Procedures

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Committed to Service. Development Services. February 21, ACHD Commission. Mindy Wallace, AICP

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Access Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

STAKING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEMS

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

GDOT Cross Section Elements. Course ID: GDOT PDH Credits

APPENDIX L. Design Criteria

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

City of Prince Albert Statement of POLICY and PROCEDURE. Department: Public Works Policy No. 66. Section: Transportation Issued: July 14, 2014

Update to DOTD Roundabout Design Policy

FORT WAYNE - NEW HAVEN - ALLEN COUNTY ACCESS STANDARDS MANUAL. Introduction and Objectives... I. Access Management Elements... 1

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

Traffic Engineering and Highway Safety Bulletin June Overview

GDOT Elements of Design. Course ID: GDOT PDH Credits

Roads that are intended to be included in the VDOT system of maintained roadways must meet the standards and specifications prescribed by the VDOT.

Practical Application of Turn Lane Design Criteria in Developing Suburban & Urban Corridors

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

9.1 FUNCTIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEMS IN URBANIZED AREAS Principal Arterial Interstate Principal Arterial Non-Interstate

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE


KDOT Access Management Policy (AMP)

CHAPTER 8 STAKING SIGNALS AND LIGHTING FIELD GUIDE. 8.1 Staking Traffic Control Signal Systems

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 613 IMPACT ATTENUATOR WORK DESCRIPTION 3

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION STREETS TABLE 1A CG-6 CURB AND GUTTER SECTION

UNCURBED INTERSECTIONS APPROACH TREATMENT DETAIL I

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

TABLE OF CONTENTS. General... A. New Construction/Reconstruction (4R)...B. Resurfacing, Restoration and Rehabilitation (3R)...C

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE Traffic Department MEMORANDUM

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

Right and Left Turn Lane Warrants

Capital Region Council of Governments

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

PENNDOT HPMS DATA COLLECTION GUIDE. Bureau of Planning and Research Transportation Planning Division April 2016 (Updated March 2018)

Citizens Handbook for Requesting Traffic Calming Devices

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications

APPENDIX B(1) SUBDIVISION STREET DESIGN GUIDE. SECTION B(1) 1 INTRODUCTION Introduction... B(1)-1

Guidelines for Integrating Safety and Cost-Effectiveness into Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Transcription:

GWINNETT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 of 7 June 20, 2007

GENERAL: The following guidelines shall be used in the determination of the requirement for left turn lanes for development projects and in the design and construction of left turn lanes. Design of left turn lanes shall be in accordance with American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials standards and Gwinnett County Development Regulations. Construction, material specifications and workmanship shall conform to Gwinnett County Development Regulations. LEFT TURN LANE WARRANTS: Center/median left turn lanes (LTL) shall be provided into each project driveway or subdivision street that accesses a Minor Collector Street or Major Thoroughfare if the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on the Minor Collector or Major Thoroughfare, and the number of lots, units, or left turning vehicles (LTV) meet or exceed the amounts shown in Tables 1 thru 3. Gwinnett County DOT (GCDOT) traffic counts shall be used provided they are less than two years old. GCDOT traffic counts are available on the County Web Site (www.gwinnettcounty.com). If GCDOT traffic counts are not available, or they are greater than two years old, Georgia DOT (GDOT) counts may be used provided they are also less than two years old. If counts are not available from either source, and/or both sources are greater than two years old, the developer shall be responsible for obtaining new, 24-hour counts, from an approved contractor, as directed by GCDOT. LTL DESIGN CRITERIA: The basic design elements of left turn lanes are illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 is for a symmetrical widening about the centerline of the road, and Figure 2 is for an unsymmetrical widening. Every effort should be made to obtain the approach, departure and bay taper lengths shown on these figures. However, GCDOT recognizes that prevailing field conditions might influence the length of tapers that can be reasonably achieved. Therefore, with the prior approval of GCDOT, these taper lengths may be adjusted to match the prevailing field conditions. STORAGE LANE LENGTH: The required length of full width storage lane provided shall be based on the peak hour turning volumes and the design vehicle length. Use 25 feet of storage for passenger cars, 35 feet for Single Unit Trucks (SU), 50 for WB-40 trucks, 60 feet for WB-50 and 75 feet for WB 62 trucks. Refer to AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets for other vehicle lengths. For un-signalized/stop-controlled intersections the storage lane length shall, typically, be based on the number of design vehicles arriving during a two-minute period within the peak hour. Similarly, for signalized intersections, the storage length shall, typically, be sufficient to accommodate the number of design vehicles arriving during 1.5 signal cycles during the peak hour. The minimum storage lane length shall be 100 feet on Collector Roads and 150 feet on Arterial Roads. Other storage lane lengths may be used with the prior approval of GCDOT. 2 of 7 June 20, 2007

SHOULDER WIDTHS: Desirable shoulder width shall be eleven feet from back of curb or edge of pavement. However, consideration for a reduced shoulder width may be given due to right-of-way limitations or field conditions. If there is no curb and gutter, the first two feet of the shoulder shall be paved using the same pavement section and cross slope as the adjacent pavement. CLEAR ZONE: Clear Zone requirements on roads widened for construction of a LTL shall be in accordance with Section 9.5.4 of the County Development Regulations, latest edition. If warranted by traffic volume, posted speed limit and field conditions, GCDOT may require a greater clear zone dependent upon the availability of existing right-of-way. Except for those items mentioned in the Development Regulations, the Clear Zone should be clear of obstructions such as poles, guy wires, and trees. Obstructions shall be removed from the Clear Zone as directed by the GCDOT at no cost to the County. If obstructions are unavoidable, appropriate protection such as breakaway poles, guardrail, and safety end treatment on culverts shall be used as directed by GCDOT. CURB AND GUTTER: In general, curb and gutter will not be required in the construction of left turn lanes. However, any existing curb and gutter disturbed or removed by left turn lane construction shall be replaced. In some cases, curb and gutter may be necessary due to right-ofway limitations, drainage considerations or physical constraints or conditions where its installation would be appropriate. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Any offsite right-of-way and/or easements required for left turn lane construction shall be acquired by the developer at no expense to the County. If the developer demonstrates that he has made a determined effort, but is unable to acquire the necessary right-of-way and/or easements, the GCDOT shall initiate acquisition proceedings, at the expense of the developer, after authorization by the Board of Commissioners. In the event that the developer is unable to negotiate acquisition of the necessary right-of-way and easements prior to completion of the project site work, GCDOT would not object to acceptance of the Certificate of Development Conformance (CDC), in accordance with Article 11 of the Development Regulations, provided the developer submits a Performance Bond for a minimum twenty four month period for 150% of the total project cost, including, but not limited to, engineering, right-of-way and/or easement acquisition, utility adjustments, and furnishing and installing all materials. The developer will be responsible for providing the cost estimate for review and approval by the GCDOT. 3 of 7 June 20, 2007

MULTIPLE ENTRY POINTS: Each entry point for a development shall be considered individually in the determination of the requirement for a left turn lane, based upon a reasonable distribution of entry volumes among the entry points. A left turn lane will be required at any entry point that meets the thresholds in Tables 1 through 3. EXISTING DRIVEWAYS/STREETS: If a new project, that requires a LTL, has an access driveway or street that aligns with an existing development driveway/street, and the existing development driveway/street does not have a LTL, the developer shall be responsible for providing a LTL for both driveways/streets. Other existing development driveways/streets (either on the same or opposite side of the street as the project driveway/street) that fall within the construction limit of the LTL will be handled on a case by case basis. Instances may arise where an existing driveway will be used to access a site/property that will be redeveloped or expanded. For an expansion, if the traffic generated by the existing land use, plus the traffic generated by the expansion, meet the thresholds in Tables 1 thru 3, then a LTL will be required and shall meet the requirements contained herein. For a redevelopment, the traffic generated by the new land use shall be used to determine the LTL requirement. PHASED DEVELOPMENTS: In the event that a phased development is proposed, and the first phase(s) of the development does (do) not meet the requirements of Tables 1 thru 3, as applicable, the developer will not be required to install a LTL with the first phase. However, when the development meets the thresholds in the Tables, the LTL will be required and shall meet the requirements contained herein. The developer will be encouraged to install the LTL during the earlier stages of the development. DIVIDED ROADWAYS: Developments on roadways divided by an existing median will not be required to install a left turn lane in the median. Such developments may request a median break. If the median break is approved by GCDOT, a left turn lane shall be constructed. If the development access point aligns with an existing access point on the opposite side of the roadway, or if directed by GCDOT, a left turn lane shall also be constructed for opposing traffic. COORDINATION WITH GCDOT PROJECTS: A development requiring left turn lane construction on a roadway with a planned GCDOT improvement project will require coordination with the GCDOT. At the option of the GCDOT, an equivalent amount of funds, in lieu of the left turn lane construction, will be deposited with the GCDOT for its use in the construction of the left turn lane during the GCDOT improvement project. 4 of 7 June 20, 2007

Minimum Requirements for Left Turn Lanes Gwinnett County Residential Developments * TABLE 1 Left Turn Lane Criteria 2 Lane Routes More Than 2 Lanes on Main Road Posted Speed -----------ADT---------- -------------ADT---------- Limit (mph) <6000 >=6000 <10,000 >=10,000 30 to 35 120 Lots 75 Lots 160 Lots 120 Lots 40 to 50 100 Lots 65 Lots 130 Lots 100 Lots >= 55 75 lots 55 Lots 100 Lots 75 Lots * Zoning Districts R-XX(X) Gwinnett County Multi-Family Residential Developments ** TABLE 2 Left Turn Lane Criteria 2 Lane Routes More Than 2 Lanes on Main Road Posted Speed -------------ADT---------- -------------ADT---------- Limit (mph) <6000 >=6000 <10,000 >=10,000 30 to 35 175 units 110 units 245 units 175 units 40 to 50 145 units 95 units 195 units 145 units >= 55 110 units 75 units 145 units 110 units ** Zoning Districts RM-X(X) Gwinnett County Non-Residential Developments TABLE 3 Left Turn Lane Criteria 2 Lane Routes More Than 2 Lanes on Main Road Posted Speed -------------ADT---------- -------------ADT---------- Limit (mph) <6000 >=6000 <10,000 >=10,000 30 to 35 30 LTV/hr 20 LTV/hr 40 LTV/hr 30 LTV/hr 40 to 50 25 LTV/hr 20 LTV/hr 35 LTV/hr 25 LTV/hr >= 55 20 LTV/hr 15 LTV/hr 25 LTV/hr 20 LTV/hr LTV/hr. Left turning vehicles entering development (in peak hour) ASSUME: 1. Peak hour factor (K) = 10% 2. 50% of all entering traffic is turning left into the development NOTE: Developer will be required to provide a trip generation analysis of the traffic volume for the proposed Non-Residential Development. This analysis will be determined using the latest edition of Trip Generation by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). 5 of 7 June 20, 2007

6 of 7 June 20, 2007

7 of 7 June 20, 2007