Executive Summary Security Devices International Inc. (SDI) Blunt Impact Projectile

Similar documents
.38 Special JHP performance through Bone Simulant plates With Ballistic Gelatin backing. 22 September 2011

Tactical Briefs (Volume 2, Number 7) July 1999

A Flexible and Effective Beanbag Platform. Doreen Hudson Supervising Criminalist Los Angeles Police Department

Ballistics and Trajectory

110 gr. TAP URBAN #80896 Polymer Tipped Spitzer Flat Base Bullet B.C. =.290

gr. GMX TAP PATROL #81275 Polymer Tipped Copper Alloy Bullet B.C. = gr. GMX TAP BARRIER #81255 Monolithic Flat Base Bullet B.C. =.

Greater the mass the greater the energy Double mass = KE Greater the speed the greater the energy Double speed = x increase KE

A study on police bean bag injuries in a pork model

Ballistics and Trajectory

7HUPLQDO EDOOLVWLFV HYDOXDWLRQ RI WKH PX]]OHORDGLQJ EXOOHW YV PRGHUQ KXQWLQJ DPPXQLWLRQ

Ballistic Gel - Powder

TRAINING Ammunition. 9MM LUGER 135 gr. FMJ Training Full Metal Jacket Flat Point Bullet B.C. =.195

Introduction. Level 1

.223 / 5.56 Penetration Tests vs. .40 S&W and 12 ga. Slug

CRITICAL DUTY. 124 gr. 9mm LUGER+P #90215 FlexLock Bullet B.C. = gr. 9mm LUGER #90235 FlexLock Bullet B.C. = gr. 9mm LUGER+P #90225

Drilling Efficiency Utilizing Coriolis Flow Technology

Advancements in Personnel Incapacitation Methodologies for Multiple Cartridge Projectiles (MPCs)

CCI-SPEER Development Engineering Lewiston ID USA

SHOTGUN 12 GA TAP REDUCED RECOIL # Gauge 12 GA TAP LIGHT MAGNUM # GA 2 3 /4 " 1 oz. LIGHT MAGNUM SLUG #86235 Rifled Slug

DEDICATED TO YOUR MISSION PRODUCT CATALOG

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) SLED TEST PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSING KNEE IMPACT AREAS

FORENSIC SCIENCE PAPER No. 6 : Forensic Ballistics MODULE No.25: Shotgun Ballistics

Appendix 5 NRA INSTRUCTOR TRAINING PROGRAM PRE-COURSE QUALIFICATION PISTOL

Sighting in a rifle scope

The Forensic Aspects and Challenges of Winchester s Tin.22LR Bullets

Baselining of the 40mm Family of Ammunition

2016 International Perforating Symposium May Galveston, Texas

Some Aspects Regarding Testing Procedures for 9x19 mm Ammunition System while Evaluating Ballistic and Safety Characteristics During Life Cycle

23 RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BALLISTICS TARRAGONA, SPAIN APRIL 2007

AirMunition is much more than one training system. It is a technology that allows new training concepts to be applied in specialist environments.

Live Round Interrupter (LRI) Technical Implementation White Paper

Echo Sounder Evaluation of XBT Drop Rate off the coast of Florida

Planning of Drilling Operations in Extreme Ocean Currents

U.S. Tactical Supply Less Lethal 40MM Range Day

STEEL SHOT: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW. Part 2

Hit Probability of selected 12 gauge buckshot cartridges as a function of distance from the weapon. 25 July 2011

OptonPro. High-power laser up to 7000 mw. Laser therapy natural healing with the power of light

Basic Pistol Test Study Guide

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WEAPONS TRAINING BATTALION MARINE CORPS COMBAT DEVELOPMENT COMMAND QUANTICO, VIRGINIA INSTRUCTOR GUIDE

100% Effective Natural Hormone Treatment Menopause, Andropause And Other Hormone Imbalances Impair Healthy Healing In People Over The Age Of 30!

5.56MM REDUCED RICOCHET LIMITED PENETRATION (RRLP), MK 255 Mod 0

Preliminary Biology Assessment Task #1. Part 1 is to be completed and handed in before the start of period 1 on Friday 13/05/2016.

Making Light-Weights

Air rifle ammunition and its influence on wounding potential

FIREARMS TRAINING. Firearms Intermediate Level

War Injury. Saman W.Boskani HDD, FIBMS Maxillofacial Surgeon

Procedia Engineering Procedia Engineering 2 (2010)

Training Range Program Guidelines

TRAINING DEVICES AND AIDS

FIRE PROTECTION. In fact, hydraulic modeling allows for infinite what if scenarios including:

NCCP Swimming 301 Course Summary

Lab Report. Objectives:

LESSON II: AMMUNITION KNOWLEDGE AND THE FUNDAMENTALS OF PISTOL SHOOTING

AMMUNITION & TEST REPORT APPLICATION GUIDE

Lightweight Small Arms Technologies The Epilogue

RPM Test; a tale with three twists. Chapter I

A review of best practices for Selection, Installation, Operation and Maintenance of Gas meters for Flare Applications used for Managing facility

STOPPING THE UNDERWATER DIVER THREAT

Fuzing Innovations for Air Burst Munitions: A 25mm Case Study

High-Velocity Fragment Impact Testing

B&T GL-06. Technical Specifications. Single Shot Launcher cal. 40 x 46 mm manufactured by B&T AG, Switzerland

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WEAPONS TRAINING BATTALION MARINE CORPS COMBAT DEVELOPMENT COMMAND QUANTICO, VIRGINIA

Figure 1: A hockey puck travels to the right in three different cases.

An Investigation Into The Effect Of Slack Fill In Chip Packets SCIENTIFIC REPORT

Fumehood Performance Test Report

CubeSat Balloon Drag Devices: Meeting the 25-Year De-Orbit Requirement

INSPECTION OF MULTI-DIAMETER PIPELINES OPERATING AT LOW PRESSURE. Stefan Vages > ROSEN Group

1 Introduction Basics... 3

Ballistics. (aka Firearms Iden.fica.on)

RAYTHEON STARSHIP Composite Wing & Fuselage Evaluation. Quick Look Report. 11 April, 2006

Cutting Edge Bullets. Daniel Smitchko operates. Cutting Edge Machining Solutions in Drifting, Pennsylvania,

LESS LETHAL, FLASH SOUND DIVERSIONARY DEVICE, CHEMICAL AGENTS INSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION COURSE OVERVIEW AND INSTRUCTIONAL GOALS COURSE OVERVIEW

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

Introduction To 3-Gun

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE WINCHESTER ADDS VARMINT HE 3/1 SEGMENTING BULLET TO RIMFIRE LINE-UP

Mobility Lab provides sensitive, valid and reliable outcome measures.

Predicted Dispense Volume vs. Gravimetric Measurement for the MICROLAB 600. November 2010

Advanced Law Enforcement Sniper Course

LESS LETHAL // // PRODUCTS CATALOG LESS LETHAL

Arizona Department of Public Safety. And Phoenix Police Department. Oleoresin Capsicum Staff Study

Unit 3 ~ Learning Guide Name:

An Engineering Approach to Precision Ammunition Development. Justin Pierce Design Engineer Government and International Contracts ATK Sporting Group

AN ANALYSIS ON HIGH PRESSURE DYNAMIC CALIBRATORS USED IN THE DEFENSE AREAS

Appendix A COMPARISON OF DRAINAGE ALGORITHMS UNDER GRAVITY- DRIVEN FLOW DURING GAS INJECTION

Defensive (Combat) Accuracy

HISTORY DESIGN SAFETY

Introduction to Handgun Safety Study Guide

Not long after the U.S. Army s entry into Afghanistan,

Projectile Motion INTRODUCTION. Time-of-flight vs. Initial Velocity. Projectile Motion

FITNESS TESTING PKG. REPORT AND SPARQ PROTOCOL

World Pool-Billiard Association - 9 Ball Rules

HISTORY DESIGN SAFETY

The Modified Tank Ammunition

Ohio Defensive Handgun: Knowledge, Skills, & Law Study Guide: Lesson One

PREDICTING the outcomes of sporting events

Application of Simulation Technology to Mitsubishi Air Lubrication System

Stiletto Systems Limited All Rights Reserved

Interface Pressure Mapping (IPM) Clinical Use of the Literature

ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Mini-project 3 Tennis ball launcher

Injector Dynamics Assumptions and their Impact on Predicting Cavitation and Performance

Transcription:

July 16 th, 2012 Executive Summary Security Devices International Inc. (SDI) Blunt Impact Projectile On June 02, 2012 testing was conducted on the 40mm Blunt Impact Projectile (BIP). The purpose of the CRT Less-Lethal impact munition testing protocol is to determine relative safety, effectiveness, and injury potential of launched less-lethal impact projectiles. This testing protocol includes the evaluation of accuracy, precision, consistency, muzzle and target energy, impact energy density, and effective range of the device. This testing model has been proven to reliably predict the wound profile and blunt trauma of human volunteers that have been subjected to a number of less-lethal impact munitions. Testing was comprised of three phases: Phase One-Preliminary Evaluation Accuracy, consistency, and maximum range established on static targets Capture wound profile in ballistic media (MBM ballistic soap) Phase Two-Ballistic Media Establish injury potential with 10% ballistic gelatin Two standoff distances: 10 feet (~3m), 35 feet (~10.5m) Bare and covered with 3mm neoprene (skin simulant) Intrusion and impact size on gelatin measured Evaluation of the round post-firing Phase Three-Human Exposure 6 Volunteers BIP, 1 Volunteer-Exact Impact (Blue nose) Similar target area on all subjects Ultrasound of pre and post wound areas Documentation of wounds for 72 hours Comparison to wounds of other products BIP Rounds as Received

Phase One-Preliminary Evaluation Testing took place on May 31, 2012. As part of the preliminary evaluation, BIP rounds were fired from a bench rest with a single-shot Defense Technology 40mm launcher with an EO Tech, model 552 optical sighting system. Three rounds were fired at a standoff distance of 35 feet (~10.6 m) into a static target to establish accuracy and precision. The impact pattern of the three rounds was within acceptable limits (~3-7.5 cm accuracy) when compared to similar impact rounds. Three rounds were fired at 80 feet (25 m) and demonstrated approximately 6-8 (15cm-20cm) drop from point of aim. Three rounds were fired at 150 feet (45 m) and demonstrated an approximate 2-3 feet (~1 m) drop from point of aim. Maximum range testing was not explored further. Three rounds were fired at a standoff distance of 10 feet (~3 m) into bare Maki Ballistic Media (MBM) to simulate the wound profile of the BIP round into human tissue. The displacement volume of the cavity left in the MBM was measured for the BIP round and the control rounds: Exact Impact Defense Technology 40mm round (6325 Blue Nose) and the CTS (Combined Tactical Systems) 4557 40mm round. From Top: CTS 4557, SDI s BIP and exact impact fired into MBM at 10 feet Volume Displacement and Depth MBM Disruption Avg. Width Max Depth Approx. Volume CTS 50 mm 35 mm 39 cm 3 BIP 55 mm 28 mm 41 cm 3 exact Impact 47 mm 23 mm 22 cm 3 The volume displacement/potential allows a static representation of the wound profile. This test serves only to estimate round performance prior to Phase-Two testing and is not considered scientific due to sample size.

Phase Two-Ballistic Media Phase-Two of the CRT evaluation of less lethal impact munitions was based on testing protocols developed by the International Wound Ballistics Association (Fackler, et. Al.). The protocol specifies the use of properly calibrated 10% ballistics gelatin to simulate bullet effects on human tissue. Calibration is based on temperature of the gel block and penetration of a standard.177 caliber BB to a certain depth at a certain velocity. This testing method was adapted by CRT LL for slower and larger less lethal impact rounds by utilizing slow motion video on both bare and covered (3 mm neoprene) 10 pound blocks of 10% ballistic gelatin. Interpretation of the video along with thorough documentation of the disruption to the media after impact offers valuable clues as to round performance. The testing was conducted at two distances: 10 feet (~3 m) to simulate worst case scenario deployment and 35 feet (~10.5 m) to simulate a standard deployment range. Data from the impact of the BIP into the ballistic gelatin was obtained for 25 rounds. Analysis of the data demonstrated that the round consistently struck the face of the gelatin orthogonally (90 degrees) and with similar intrusion depths. Separation of the nose section from the base upon impact was observed for several rounds. The disruption and maximum penetration depths of the ballistic gelatin were within acceptable limits when compared to similar lesslethal munitions of this type. The results obtained from the 10% ballistic gelatin method combined with data compiled from other tissue simulants such as Maki Ballistic Media (MBM) allows accurate predictions of wound profiles in human targets. These testing methods have been validated when compared to the wound profiles from human effects studies over the last seven years. Accuracy/Precision The area of impact is intentionally designed to be small for this type of round. The target surface of the gelatin was approximately 9 cm x 15 cm (135 cm 2 ). All shots were fired from a bench rested position by a highly qualified marksman. Accuracy and precision determinations were made based on the round striking a majority of that surface. Slight impacts were classified as a miss. As the testing progressed, misses were attributed to either a slight variance of the round or changes in chamber pressure due to residue buildup. After each logged miss the bore of the launcher was cleaned.

Phase Two-Ballistic Media, Bare Critical Research and Training BIP Fired into Covered (3 mm Neoprene) 10% Ballistic Gelatin Phase Two-Ballistic Media, Covered Average values of data collected from ballistic gelatin After each round was fired into the ballistic gelatin disruption/intrusion into the gelatin was photographed and logged to establish wounding potential. Velocity measurements were not captured for all of the fired BIP rounds due to an equipment malfunction, but enough were obtained for a sufficient sample size. Data for both tested ranges: Based on previous testing using the CRT LL protocol, the intrusion must be less than 7 cm into bare gelatin, and less than 1 cm into covered gelatin to pass safety protocols for wound/injury potential at both 10 feet (~3 m), and 35 feet (~10.5 m) ranges. Phase-Two Post Firing BIP Measurements Wound/injury potential is determined by energy density of the projectile. For less-lethal munitions energy density is controlled by four factors: velocity, weight, construction and size of the impact surface. It is crucial that the BIP round remain intact as it impacts. The less the round fragments, the more material can impact the surface efficiently, increasing effectiveness. If the round increases surface area (expands) on impact then less injury will occur (decrease depth of energy dispersal), and more sensory nerves on the skin surface will be stimulated (pain reception). Impact Pattern of BIP on Covered (3 mm Neoprene) 10% Ballistic Gelatin

Phase Three-Human Effects Testing Seven subjects were utilized to test and evaluate the effects of the BIP for comparison to the data collected in Phases One and Two. The lateral thigh region was selected as the target area for purposes of safety, specifically avoiding the chest area or boney prominences. The density of the muscle tissue in the thigh area generally produces consistent wound profiling. The target region of each subject was ultrasonically scanned before and after the exposure to the impact rounds. The subjects were designated A-G and their height and weight was recorded. The scanned area was marked and measured from the subject s foot to maintain consistent targeting between all seven subjects. The wound areas were scanned to document the injury depth and extent of the wound inflicted from the projectile impact. Most subjects were clothed over the impact site, but two were exposed with bare skin only. Ultrasound and Measuring of Target Area of the Subjects Phase Three-Human Effects Testing The human effects testing serves as a practical example of the potential injury inflicted when this round is deployed in the field. Phase Three testing also helps to further validate the CRT LL testing protocols. Additionally, data collected from the subjects ultrasound scans combined with photos of the wounds over time will help to gain further understanding as to exactly how the BIP and other impact munitions effect the body (ultrasound interpretation requires further study and data will be released at a later date). Ultrasound and Measuring of Target Area of the Subjects Phase Three-Human Effects Testing Subject A-Wound photos - Wound Progression 8 hours 24 hours 72 hours

Conclusions The purpose of the CRT Less-Lethal impact munition testing protocol is to determine relative safety, effectiveness, and injury potential of launched less-lethal impact projectiles. Since 2003, this testing protocol has included the evaluation of many aspects and qualities of a less lethal tool to ensure the success of its deployment. Based on experience, training, and scientific testing, CRT LL, Inc. testing protocols serve to compare the tested product to previously evaluated devices that are currently available on the law enforcement market. This testing model has been proven to reliably predict the wound profile and potential injury of human subjects that have been exposed to a number of less-lethal impact munitions. The testing model, however, cannot predict every possible outcome when applied in a real-life scenario. Phase One The BIP projectile was within acceptable norms for accuracy and consistency during preliminary examination and testing. The BIP did tip as it impacted the MBM (ballistic soap) increasing disruption, but the wound profile was within acceptable ranges when compared to control rounds. Accuracy appeared acceptable out to 25 meters. Extended/Maximum range testing of the round was not explored further at this time. Phase Two The BIP projectile fired into ballistic media (gelatin and soap) served to predict relative performance and injury potential. The BIP was within acceptable limits for accuracy and precision at the two ranges tested, 10 feet (~3 m) and 35 feet (~10.5 m). The intrusion of the BIP into the bare and covered 10% ballistic gelatin was within the acceptable maximum limits for safety (wound/injury potential) when compared to less-lethal products with a known outcome. The nose of the BIP expanded consistently upon impact while remaining largely intact adhering to tolerances for energy density. The BIP projectile was within acceptable norms for total weight and velocity (energy). Phase Three The profile and progression of the wounds of all six test subjects exposed (thigh region) to the BIP were within acceptable tolerances, with the exception of Subject G, who performed heavy exercise soon after exposure (resulting in greater than normal ecchymosis to the area). None of the subjects required medical attention nor suffered long term effects from the BIP round. Based on the data obtained from the three-stage evaluation, including wound interpretation from human effects, the Blunt Impact Projectile (BIP) passed the CRT LL testing protocol for accuracy, consistency, relative safety and effectiveness. CRT provided recommendations to the manufacturer in order to improve overall performance and effectiveness when the product is applied in the field. SDI has since complied to all recommendations made by CRT.