Vertebrate Pests of Rice

Similar documents
Vertebrate Pest Management for Grapes

Managing Burrowing Mammals

STUDY GUIDE A Guide to California Ground Squirrels Identification, Biology and Control Methods

BIOLOGY, LEGAL STATUS, CONTROL MATERIALS, AND DIRECTIONS FOR USE

THE RICHARDSON GROUND SQUIRREL ITS BIOLOGY AND CONTROL MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BOX HELENA MT

Burrowing Rodent Management

BURROWING RODENTS GROUND SQUIRRELS SANTA CLARA COUNTY AGRICULTURAL OFFICE

Airports and Wildlife. What you Need to Know. A Guide for the Public

Control of Pocket Gophers and Ground Squirrels

Using IPM to Manage Ground Squirrels

Vertebrate Pest Management in Pistachio Orchards. Julie Finzel Livestock and Natural Resources Farm Advisor Kern, Tulare, and Kings Counties

of Nebraska - Lincoln

Pest animal control. Guiding principles for community groups and landowners

5/26/18. San Diego Master Gardeners Vertebrate Pest Management Training. Things I have caught in a rat trap? The Vertebrate Pest Rules

Pesticide Applicator Training

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

Ground Invasion by Voles. Nebraska Extension

PROTECTING NON-TARGET WILDLIFE FROM RODENTICIDES. Stella McMillin California Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Investigations Laboratory

Unit PM 2.1 Vertebrate Pest Management Specimen Paper

Wildlife in the Urban Interface. Jeff Schalau Agent, Agriculture & Natural Resources University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yavapai County

School Ground Invasion by Voles

Long-tailed Weasel. Mustela frenata. Other common names. Introduction. None

Managing Vertebrate Pests

Mississippi River Life

Pre-Regs POST (Year 1) POST (Year 2) Total No. of Cases Bromadiolone 59. % 52. % 69. % Difethialone 10. % 28. % 34. %

CONTROL OF GROUND SQUIRRELS IN CALIFORNIA USING ANTICOAGULANT TREATED BAITS

Our foundation introduce Nature and conservation in Lake Izunuma Uchinuma.

POISON KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN READ SAFETY DIRECTIONS BEFORE OPENING OR USING. Pro Rodenticide

BIOLOGY, LEGAL STATUS, CONTROL MATERIALS, AND DIRECTIONS FOR USE

UMUKARIKARI AERIAL BOVINE TB CONTROL OPERATION

Vertebrate Control Products and Potential Hazards

Wetland Habitat Flashcards. Wetlands

VERTEBRATE PESTS OF ALFALFA. Terrell p, Salmon

STRATAGEM Securable Wax Block Rodenticide

Utah Extension IPM and Sustainable Agriculture Mini Grant Program

Nutria STATION #9. Suspected of Crimes in the Wetlands.

MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. Brian Chong, Administrative Services

Coyote Canis latrans

Sustaining Wild Species

Oceans Humans both depend on it and threaten it with their activities

Livestock Concerns with Feral Hogs. Aaron Sumrall Newton Co. Extension Agent

KILLS RATS, MICE, AND GOPHERS KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION

Province of Alberta Rat Control Plan

V E R T E B R A T E P E S T C O N T R O L H A N D B O O K - M A M M A L S

Animal pest control for freshwater wetlands

Minnetonka Coyote Management. Hazing Works If We Do It Together

Predator R E S P O N S E

Coyotes: Wild and free on the urban interface. Dana Sanchez Extension Wildlife Specialist

FERALS IN THE CLASSROOM. Designed by the Institute for Applied Ecology University of Canberra Invasive Animals CRC

The Burrowing Owl Farm Bureau, July 28, 2014

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the feeding of wildlife can lead to negative impacts on animals, people and the environment; and

Canon Envirothon Wildlife Curriculum Guidelines

Hartmann s Mountain Zebra Updated: May 2, 2018

What terms do I need to understand?

Pacific Northwest Aquatic Invasive Species Profile. Nutria, Myocaster coypus

Best Management Practices for Trapping Weasels in the United States

MOLESWORTH BOVINE TB CONTROL OPERATION (YEAR 1)

CRRU Environmental Risk Assessment APRIL The Campaign for Responsible Rodenticide Use (CRRU) UK The CRRU UK Rodenticide Stewardship Regime

Management of Canada Geese

5B. Management of invasive species in the Cosumnes and Mokelumne River Basins

Current restrictions are not sufficient

Best Management Practices. for Trapping Badger in the United States

Squirrels and Rabbits

SNAIL MANAGEMENT IN CULTURE PONDS ROLE IN LIMITING GRUB ISSUES

Exemplar for Internal Achievement Standard. Geography Level 2

CHANNEL CATFISH CULTURE IN THE UNITED STATES. Leonard Lovshin Department of Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures Auburn University, AL 36849

Frequently Asked Questions About FastDraw, Revolver, & NEW Cannon Soft Bait

8. The Asian Tiger Mosquito

Reindeer & Moose. Literacy Centers For 2 nd & 3 rd Grades. FREE from The Curriculum Corner

Ground Squirrel Management

021 Deer Management Unit

WFC 50 California s Wild Vertebrates Jan. 11, Inland Waters (Lakes and Streams) Lisa Thompson

BATS: NEED NECTAR, WILL TRAVEL

Beavers in King County

FACT SHEET I. LOCATION

Integrated Pest Management for Home Gardeners and Landscape Professionals

Rats: options for controlling infestations

Ecological Pyramids Adapted from The Nevada Outdoor School, The Playa Ecological Pyramids Lesson Plan

Population Management Practices

PRISTINE. PRIVATE. PERFECT.

IPM Credentials Why am I here talking about IPM and wildlife control?

Best Management Practices for Trapping American Marten in the United States

TOC. INDEX Stable Fly Management for Feedlot Cattle. Douglas D. Colwell. Take Home Message. Introduction

River Otter. Lontra canadensis. Other common names. Introduction. Physical Description and Anatomy

BENSON PARK POND FISH SPECIES

Introduction. Description. This animal

An Overview of Recent Ground Squirrel Bait Registration Research Supported By the California Bait Surcharge Program

U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service

The Importance of Radio-collared Bears

West African Lungfish A living fossil s biological and behavioral adaptations

Wildlife Hazard Management Plan

Syllabus. CRRU-IASIS Wildlife Aware Course. for. Professional Pest Control Technicians / Operatives

ACTIVITY FIVE SPECIES AT RISK LEARNING OBJECTIVES: MATERIALS: Subjects: Science, math, art, history

Otters & Their Waters: frequently asked questions

Best Management Practices for Trapping Opossums in the United States

VERTEBRATE PEST CONTROL

Best Management Practices. Trapping Red Foxes in the United States

Alberta Conservation Association 2011/12 Project Summary Report. Velma Hudson, Julie Landry-DeBoer, Jim Potter, Amanda Rezansoff and Ken Wright

Best Management Practices for Trapping Bobcats in the United States

The science behind the Department of Conservation s beech mast response and predator control

Transcription:

Vertebrate Pests of Rice California Rice Production Workshop, 2003-2 Rice fields provide excellent habitat for some bird and rodent species. The Norway rat is probably the most serious vertebrate pest of rice, feeding on newly planted seed, seedlings, or ripening grain. Muskrats burrow in rice levees, damaging drainage systems and irrigation structures. Waterfowl and blackbirds may also cause yield losses in some localized areas. The most successful vertebrate pest management program is one that manages pest populations at levels at which significant damage never occurs. This requires knowledge of the biology and behavior of the potential pests and regular monitoring for them in and around fields. Historical records of pest population levels, control measures implemented, economics of control procedures and the success of methods used, can be used to help determine the best management approach. Consideration also should be given to the presence of non-pest species and the potential risks of a control method. The methods and materials available for vertebrate control are constantly changing. Check with your County Agricultural Commissioner on laws and regulations concerning the status of wildlife species and the methods and materials available to control them. Section author: Desley Whisson, Extension Wildlife Specialist Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, UC Davis Waterfowl Annually, large numbers of waterfowl (ducks, geese, coots) migrate along the Pacific flyway to and from their northern breeding grounds and may spend from a few weeks to months in fall and winter in California's Central Valley. Flooded rice fields provide an ideal habitat for waterfowl and have an important role in the conservation of these birds. Because most rice in California is harvested prior to the arrival of migrating waterfowl, and planted after their departure, damage to rice is usually kept to a minimum. Most problems occur where waterfowl become 'resident'. Ducks and geese cause the most serious losses in rice by feeding on maturing grain and sometimes causing lodging. Coots may sometimes damage newly planted fields. All species of waterfowl are migratory game birds that are protected by federal and state laws. Waterfowl cannot be lethally controlled 10.1

without a depredation permit. Damage can usually be alleviated using frightening (hazing) techniques. Propane cannons, electronic noise makers, pyrotechnics, mylar tape and other sound and visual scare devices may be used to frighten waterfowl from areas where they are causing damage. Waterfowl may habituate to these techniques so they might only have short-term effectiveness. Persistence in applying the methods and alternating frightening devices are important in achieving success. Blackbirds Blackbirds may damage ripening rice, especially during the milk and dough stages. Losses may be quite high in some fields that are close to important roosting areas. Frightening techniques are most commonly used to manage blackbirds. Unfortunately, these techniques are even less effective for blackbirds than waterfowl. To be effective, you must instigate these controls as soon as birds appear in the field. A permit is not needed to lethally remove blackbirds that are causing or threatening to damage rice crops. To date, repellents have not proven to be effective in reducing blackbird damage to rice in California. Norway rats Rat damage to growing rice is usually most serious shortly after planting when the water is temporarily lowered for seed germination and stand establishment. This can be especially severe where fields are not level and high spots are exposed to air. The rats pull up the sprouting plants and eat the seeds. Rats may also consume ripening grain as the cereal heads come into the milk stage but losses are generally not as serious. The Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) is responsible for most rat damage in rice fields. Norway rats have a bulky appearance and a tail that is shorter than the length of their head and body combined. Rats are mainly active at night but if their numbers are high, 10.2

activity may be observed during the day. They are omnivorous and feed on a wide variety of plant and animal materials. Norway rats dig burrows and burrow systems are frequently found along levees beside rice fields. These burrows can weaken levees systems and affect irrigation. Norway rats are prolific breeders. They are capable of breeding yearround under optimal conditions but most breeding is in spring and fall. Females produce about 4 litters per year. Average litter size is about 6, and the young are weaned at 3 weeks and become sexually mature at 2 to 3 months of age. These reproductive characteristics enable rat populations to rapidly increase and become widespread in response to onset of optimal environmental conditions. Populations typically undergo cycles of abundance. Problems are most likely to occur following mild winters and when food supply is abundant. Norway rats are non-native mammals and may be taken at any time and in any manner when they are causing damage to crops or other property. Where possible, non-crop habitats should be managed year round to reduce shelter and food supply for rats. Good weed control on levees is essential. Ground vegetation in areas adjacent to rice fields should be kept to a minimum by grazing or mowing. When rat populations continue to be high despite habitat modification, rodenticides may be used. Currently (2003) registered rodenticides for Norway rat control on levees and adjacent non-cropped areas include the acute toxicant zinc phosphide and the anticoagulants diphacinone and chlorophacinone. The rodenticide and application method should be chosen with regard for potential non-target hazards. Consult your Agricultural Commissioner for specific information. Zinc phosphide is an acute toxicant that is metabolized quickly within the target animal, and has minimal (if any) secondary poisoning risks. However, because of its fast action, rodents might only ingest a sublethal dose of bait before becoming sick. This may result in rodents becoming 'bait shy'. Consequently, it is best to wait at least 3 months, and preferably 6 months between applications. Zinc phosphide bait is placed according to label instructions in active burrows or in places frequented by rats but inaccessible to livestock, poultry, nontarget wildlife, pets and children. When possible, prebait with clean grain several days before bait application to determine if rats are taking the bait and to overcome any bait shyness. Prebaiting is especially important where other foods are abundant. Anticoagulant baits act by reducing the clotting ability of the blood. The target animal must consume a number of doses of bait over a period of 10.3

several days to obtain a lethal dose. Because a residue of the anticoagulant bait may remain in the target animal (primarily in the liver), predators or scavengers may also be at risk of consuming a lethal dose of bait. Risk increases where treated rat populations levels are extremely high (i.e., high availability of carcasses containing anticoagulant) and in areas where and at times when predator and scavenger populations are especially abundant. Risk also increases when too much bait is applied. As with all rodenticides, follow the label carefully and use as little bait as possible to bring the population under control. Anticoagulants may be applied in bait stations, by spot application, or in paraffinized bait blocks. Bait stations protect bait from rain and prevent non-target species feeding on the bait. To achieve control, keep the stations well-supplied until feeding ceases. Bait blocks made from paraffin may be placed in areas of rat activity. These blocks aren't as readily accepted as loose baits but are relatively waterproof and eliminate the need for bait boxes. Replace blocks as necessary and discard of uneaten bait when the control program is completed. Muskrats Muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) are semi-aquatic rodents named for their conspicuous odor resulting from secretions from musk glands at the ventral base of the tail. They sometimes inhabit water supply canals and drainage ditches near rice fields. Their burrowing, especially around headgates can cause breaks in levees and dikes. Significant yield loss may occur before repairs can be completed. Muskrats also occasionally cut and eat rice plants. Muskrats have dense fur, a long, laterally flattened tail and partially webbed feet. Adults are about 18 inches long and weigh from 1.5 to 2.5 pounds. Their native range in California was along the Colorado River by the Arizona border and in scattered locations on the eastern side of the Sierra Nevada from Mono to Lassen County. Construction of irrigation canals in the early 1900's enabled them to expand their range into southern California. A high demand for muskrat fur during the 1920's resulted in the release of muskrats elsewhere. Muskrats now occupy canals, ponds, and irrigation ditches throughout most of California. Muskrats are very prolific. Most females have two or three litters per 10.4

year, with an average of about 6 or 7 kits per litter. Most births occur in spring. The gestation period is between 25 and 30 days. The young become active and able to swim within 14 days, and are weaned at 28 days. Most become sexually active the spring after their birth. Depending on the environment and season, muskrats construct either houses or dig burrows into banks. Unless the population is very dense, muskrats prefer to burrow into banks rather than build houses. Soil type and slope of the bank determine the permanence and complexity of a burrow system. Burrows often begin in the water, from 6- to 8-inches below the surface, and penetrate the embankment on an upward slant. Burrows are not typically found when banks are less than 0.2 meters high, slope is less than 10 degrees, or when combined sand/gravel content is less than 90 percent. Burrows may extend 20 feet or more into banks. Houses are usually constructed from the dominant emergent plants in the area. They are built at water level with several underwater tunnels or "leads" for entrances. Muskrats are primarily herbivorous although animal matter like crayfish may occasionally be consumed. Muskrats feed on aquatic vegetation growing in the vicinity of their dwellings. Characteristic signs of muskrat feeding activity include food platforms and feeding houses. Most activity occurs at night, with peaks at dusk and dawn. Muskrats are classified as furbearers but can be taken at any time when they are causing damage to crops or other property. Management of vegetation to reduce muskrat food sources on levees and on ditch banks can help minimize muskrat problems. In some situations however, lethal control of muskrats is necessary. Trapping can be very effective in reducing muskrat populations and damage. Conibear traps are probably the most effective but it is important to note that while they can be used to remove muskrats causing damage, they cannot be used to trap muskrats for fur (see Fish and Game Code). Anticoagulant baits (diphacinone and chlorophacinone) may also be used. Bait can be placed in floating bait boxes or bait blocks (also used for Norway rat control) may be placed in muskrat feeding areas on levees and banks. 10.5

Information Sources Clark, J. P., editor. 1994. Vertebrate Pest Control Handbook. Fourth Edition. Division of Plant Industry Integrated Pest Control Branch, California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, California, USA. (For sale at the Agriculture Commissioner's office.) Hygnstrom, S. E., R. M. Timm, and G. E. Larson, editors. 1994. Prevention and control of wildlife damage. Volumes 1 and 2. University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension, U. S. Department of Agriculture Animal Damage Control, Great Plains Agricultural Council. (Available as a 2-volume set or on CD-ROM in UCCE offices. May also be ordered from the Internet Center for Wildlife Damage Management: http://wildlifedamage.unl.edu/) 10.6