Bicyclist Signing Guidelines

Similar documents
Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

Pavement Markings (1 of 3)

Off-road Trails. Guidance

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

City of Dallas Standards and Guidelines for Traffic Control and Safety Treatments at Trail-Road Crossings

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

Appendix A. Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines. Appendix A: Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines Knox to Oak Ridge Greenway Master Plan

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

VILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

Does It Work? THE BENCHMARKING PROJECT. State Department of Transportation Project Assessment. Bill Wilkinson and Bob Chauncey

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

appendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area

Chapter VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Vision. Mission. Goals and Objectives CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST.

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Development of Guidelines for Bicycle Use of Controlled Access Facilities in Virginia

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Complete Streets: Policy to Pavement

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

School Zone Traffic Control Policy

Land Use Patterns. Traditional Modern

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Brief) Highlights for Arizona Practitioners. Arizona Department of Transportation

Dakota County Transportation Department Roadway Guidance Signing

Traffic Calming Policy

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

Long Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville

MUTCD Part 6D: Pedestrian and Worker Safety

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Attachment No. 13. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

LOUISIANA COMPLETE STREETS POLICY. Ellen W. Soll, AICP Principal Soll Planning

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

ARLINGTON COUNTY PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIFICATIONS

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

What's in the 2012 California MUTCD for Pedestrians, Bicyclists, and School Areas?

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

Welcome! Urban Work Zone Design. Training Course 0-1

REVOCABLE PERMIT FOR STREET BANNER APPLICATION PACKAGE

Community Transportation Plan

MTP BICYCLE ELEMENT UPDATE. November 2017

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Construction Specifications Manual

Austell Road Access Management Plan Public Meeting February 17, 2009

Table of Contents Introduction. 2 Purpose of the Plan...2 The Benefits of Walking and Bicycling...3 Vision and Goals of the Plan...

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Bicycling Routes on Provincial Roads Policy

City of Turlock Traffic Calming Program

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT. Active Transportation in Small Urban and Rural Communities Bicycles

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

Act 47 Exception Application Process (Permitting Bicycle Travel on Freeways)

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE TRAFFIC CODE UPDATE MASTER RECOMMENDATION REPORT: 9.14, 9.16, 9.18

Table of Contents. I. Introduction 1. II. Elements of the School Crossing Program 1

Document 2 - City of Ottawa Pedestrian Crossover (PXO) Program

2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL

Complete Streets for Louisiana

Traffic Calming Policy

Multimodal Analysis in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual

Anne Arundel County BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES

ADA & Public Rights of Way

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

Community Traffic Safety Awards Program 2017 Application

City of Cape Coral Traffic Calming. City Council May 16,

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

Why Zone In on Speed Reduction?

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

VDOT BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT April 2017

Best Practices in Bicycle and Pedestrian Wayfinding in the Washington Region. Michael Farrell, COG/TPB June 2007

Engineering Report: Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests. Black Mesa Ranger District. Analysis of. National Forest System Roads (NFSRs) #s 504 & 169

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

Bicycle and Pedestrian Level of Service Evaluation

Bike San Mateo County San Mateo County Bicycle Plan Recommendations August 30, 2010

Task 4 Wayfinding Elements, Placement and Technical Guidance 4.1 Wayfinding Elements

Florida s Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (ISIP)

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

USDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Initiative: Safer People and Safer Streets. Barbara McCann, USDOT Office of Policy

Transcription:

Bicyclist Signing Guidelines April, 2009 1

Introduction This paper describes the Montana Department of Transportation s (MDT) current practices related to bicyclist safety and signing issues and presents guidelines for MDT responses to requests for signs intended to improve bicyclist safety by making motorists more aware of bicyclist traffic. Bicycling has steadily gained popularity and attention over the last twenty years both nationally and in Montana. MDT has responded to this situation by creating the Community Transportation Enhancement Program (CTEP), which provides funding for bicycle and pedestrian facilities in Montana s communities, and by considering bicyclist needs in the design of major highway projects. These efforts have resulted in a 39% increase in public satisfaction with bicyclist facilities since 1994, according to the 2007 Biennial TranPlan 21 Public Involvement Survey. Although state and local efforts have resulted in a significant increase in the number and condition of bicyclist and pedestrian facilities, the width of many Montana roads and streets still requires bicyclists and motor vehicles to operate very close to each other. Bicyclists often suggest signing as a cost-effective way to improve safety in these areas by increasing driver awareness of the presence of bicyclists. Examples of bicycle related signs can be found in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and include: regulatory signs for bicycle facilities, warning signs for bicycle facilities, and guide signs for bicycle facilities. Share the Road signs are among the most common bicycle-related signage. Share the Road signs are often used together with a bicycle silhouette sign. Other sign options include Watch for Bicyclists or Bicyclists Ahead. Background Unlike in most other states, all roads in Montana that are open to public travel by a motorized vehicle are also open to bicyclists. In addition, MCA 61-8-602 specifies that Every person operating a bicycle shall be granted all of the rights and shall be subject to all of the duties applicable to the driver of any other vehicle. Montana s statewide transportation plan, TranPlan 21, addresses a range of policy goals and actions to institutionalize bicycle and pedestrian modes of transportation. In addition, Montana law (MCA 60-3-30), addresses bicycle and pedestrian funding and sets minimum annual spending requirements for footpaths and bicycle trails. MDT has historically exceeded these requirements. MDT has also established a full time bicycle/pedestrian coordinator position to facilitate statewide bicycle and pedestrian planning. This position provides technical assistance to state and local government agencies, distributes bicycle tourist information, acts as a 2

clearing house for bicycle and pedestrian safety information and ensures that bicycle and pedestrian issues are consistently addressed early in the project development process. Bicycling groups, local officials, and individuals periodically request Share the Road signs or signs with similar messages. In the past, MDT has turned down these requests due to the absence of consistent standards and concerns about maintenance costs, potential liability issues, and sign proliferation. There is also little statistical evidence that permanent signs contribute to improved safety especially in areas where bicyclist traffic is seasonal and/or sporadic. This is an important consideration in deciding to install signs that are themselves potential road hazards that could also block views of essential warning signs. In addition, unlike with passenger and commercial vehicle traffic, it is difficult to collect bicycle traffic volume data necessary to provide quantifiable criteria for a signing policy. MDT and other road management agencies must therefore rely on observed or perceived traffic volumes in developing signing standards. Related Practices MDT is involved in the following activities that support and encourage safe bicycle travel: MDT s website provides information on State bicycling laws, traffic data, and contact information for bicyclist clubs and shops. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator and District Offices manage a program that provides free portable BIKES ON ROADWAY signs to bicycling event organizers. MDT participates in safety fairs to promote bicycle and pedestrian safety. MDT s Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator reviews proposals for major new highway projects early in the process to identify potential bicyclist and pedestrian issues. MDT has considered bicyclist needs in the development and implementation of its rumble strip policy. For example, MDT reduced the proposed width of rumble strips in its original rumble strip policy in response to suggestions from bicyclists. Later adjustments included the provision of regular gaps in rumble strips to allow bicyclists to move on and off the shoulder. The policy also allows for the omission of rumble strips on roadways with shoulders 4' or less. MDT publishes and distributes a map that provides key highway information for bicyclists including shoulder widths, traffic volumes, and rumble strip locations. MDT considers bicyclist needs, as appropriate, in the design of major highway projects. This consideration, which includes input from the public and local 3

officials through the project s public involvement process, can result in wider shoulders or separated paths in rural or suburban areas or signed bicycle lanes in urban environments. Wider shoulders in rural areas have the added benefit of improving safety for all highway users. In cooperation with the Montana Highway Patrol, MDT has developed and distributed Share the Road bumper stickers, window transparencies, and posters to schools, clubs, and individuals. Rather than focus on one type of highway user, this material presents a general Share the Road message in recognition of the importance of sharing the road with all other highway users. In recognition of the multi-modal value of the Share the Road message, MDT is also evaluating the cost and potential effectiveness of installing signs on key locations along Montana highways such as on two-lane highways at entrances to Montana. Guidelines Local governments or bicycle clubs* can submit requests for signs to MDT district or headquarters staff. Requests must include the proposed location for the signs and a commitment of non-mdt funding for the sign costs. MDT staff will review the requests based on the following evaluation criteria. If criteria are met, MDT maintenance staff will construct, install, and maintain the signs. If criteria are not met, but sign placement is deemed appropriate after engineering review, MDT and the requesting entity will share the cost of the sign installation, while MDT maintenance staff will construct, install, and maintain the signs. MDT s Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator will maintain a record of requests and sign locations. Evaluation Criteria 1. Requestor and/or MDT staff verify that route is used by bicyclists on a continuous basis over several seasons. If not, signs will not be installed. If yes, proceed to criteria # 2. 2. Sites are limited to rural and transitional areas with a posted speed limit of 45 mph or greater. If not, signs will not be installed. If yes, proceed to criteria #3. 3. Average annual daily traffic greater than 1,000. If not, signs will not be installed. If yes, proceed to criteria # 4. 4. Minimum paved surface width less than 24 feet. If yes, sign may be installed. If not, proceed to criteria # 5. 4

5. Usable shoulder width less than 2 feet. If yes, signs may be installed Signs may not be installed in urban and suburban areas if sign clutter detracts from the effectiveness of the signs. In Montana s urban areas, MDT may develop agreements with city or county governments to install and maintain signs on MDT routes in accordance with criteria and standards described in the agreements. The number and location of signs will be determined based on site conditions. Exceptions to the above criteria may apply if the route is formally used as a bicycle club touring/practice route * Bicycle clubs typically have bylaws, elected officers, and regularly scheduled meetings. Sign Configuration & Cost The color of all signs will be black on yellow. Yellow-green colored signs should be reserved solely for school crosswalks. 30 X 30, (AASHTO W11-1) -- In house cost: $84 24 X 30, (AASHTO W16-1) -- In house cost: $67 Total cost is $151 per two-sign combination, not including the sign support, if constructed in house. The sign support will likely be a 5 inch pole, which will cost $8.25 per lineal foot if provided by MDT, or $11.57 per lineal foot if purchased from a contractor. A 14-foot long pole will cost $115 in house, and possibly $162 through a contractor. 5

Using these estimates, a two-sign combination, including pole, will cost approximately $266.47 in house. Long term maintenance costs are not included in the above estimates. Costs based on 2007 estimates----cost estimates will be updated periodically. 6