U.S. AIR FORCE/USACE FRANGIBILITY UPDATE

Similar documents
Inspecting Aerodrome Construction

VI.B. Traffic Patterns

Aerodrome Inspectors Workshop

Aerodrome Design Manual

VI.B. Traffic Patterns

National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Notice of Public Meeting for the Interagency Working Group

ILS APPROACH WITH A320

COSCAP-South Asia ADVISORY CIRCULAR FOR AIR OPERATORS

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL

National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project Conducting Counts

Flight Profiles are designed as a guideline. Power settings are recommended and subject to change based

Portland International Airport Public Involvement. Chris White Community Affairs Manager June 7, 2012

Compiled by Matt Zagoren

Airfield Pavement Smoothness Airport Pavement Workshop. Michael Gerardi APR Consultants

MANEUVERS GUIDE. Liberty Aerospace 1383 General Aviation Drive Melbourne, FL (800)

SUPPLEMENT TO AIRCRAFT FLIGHT MANUAL FOR MOTOR-DRIVEN ROPE WINCH TYPE RPM 11/01

CESSNA 172-SP PRIVATE & COMMERCIAL COURSE

Operating Committee Strategic Plan

Advisory Circular (AC)

Welcome to Aerospace Engineering

Commercial Maneuvers for PA28RT-201

Teaching Landings by the Numbers: Quantifying the Visual Approach and Landing

BOEING National Aeromodelling Competition PROBLEM STATEMENT

INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR EXHAUST CUFF MODIFICATION

Goals, Objectives, and Policies

FINAL REPORT. Wind Assessment for: NEW OFFICE BUILDING AT ESSENDON FIELDS Essendon, Victoria, Australia

1.0 PURPOSE 2.0 REFERENCES

G+ Global offshore wind health and safety organisation

NORMAL TAKEOFF PILOT TRAINING MANUAL KING AIR 200 SERIES OF AIRCRAFT

BILLY BISHOP TORONTO CITY AIRPORT PRELIMINARY RUNWAY DESIGN COASTAL ENGINEERING STUDY

Chapter PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND ACCOUNTABILITY. Introduction

Safety assessments for Aerodromes (Chapter 3 of the PANS-Aerodromes, 1 st ed)

STUDY OF LANDING TECHNIQUE DURING VISUAL APPROACH

A-License Information Packet

Continuous Descent Final Approach

AERODROME ADVISORY CIRCULAR

Bicycle Advisory Committee. April 5, :00-4:00pm City Hall Annex Council Chambers

POWER-OFF 180 ACCURACY APPROACH AND LANDING

SUPPLEMENT SEPTEMBER 2010 HIGH ALTITUDE TAKEOFF AND LANDING (ABOVE 14,000 FEET PRESSURE ALTITUDE) MODEL AND ON 68FM-S28-00 S28-1

Portland International Airport Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (October 2003) Staff Acknowledgements

Tecnam Eaglet Standard Operating Procedures and Maneuvers Supplement

CLEARED AND GRADED AREA (CGA): CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND PROPOSAL OF A CRITERION FOR GRADING ITS BEARING CAPACITY

Cessna 172S Skyhawk Standardization Manual

KEEPING THE WORLD ON COURSE SINCE 1951!

Organising the National Technology Needs Assessment (TNA) Process: An Explanatory Note

Risk Analysis Process Tool for Surface Loss of Separation Events

What standards apply to rooftop fall protections systems?

Mechanical vibration Rotor balancing. Part 11: Procedures and tolerances for rotors with rigid behaviour

(B.III (corrigendum) CRD to NPA (B.III (corrigendum) CS-ADR Book 1 and 2 - Table J-1 to Book 1 Subpart J

Mountain Fury Mountain Search Flying Course Syllabus Fourth Sortie : High Altitude Search

TERMINAL PROCEDURES PUBLICATION SYMBOLS

APPENDIX J REQUIRED NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE IMPACTS EVALUATION REPORT

MODEL AERONAUTICAL ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

OBSTACLE DEPARTURE PROCEDURES Part 3

Stalls and Spins. Tom Johnson CFIG

COURSE TITLE INSTRUCTOR LOCATION TIME

IFE Level 3 Diploma in Fire Science and Fire Safety

The subsonic compressibility effect is added by replacing. with

So it s Reliable but is it Safe? - a More Balanced Approach To ATM Safety Assessment

WINDSOCK MASTS TECHNICAL INFORMATION

NEW FALL PROTECTION LEGISLATION. Presented by Michael McGovern, Roland Roy

Aviation Teleclass Webinar!

June 13, Dear Sir,

Chapter 4 EM THE COASTAL ENGINEERING MANUAL (Part I) 1 August 2008 (Change 2) Table of Contents. Page. I-4-1. Background...

How to make my Air Glide S work properly

Advisory Circular. Runway Guard Light Installation Criteria. Aviation Safety Regulatory Framework Document No.: AC A P/A Issue No.

GEA FOR ADVANCED STRUCTURAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

SMOKE & FUME / SMELL EVENTS

HINDSIGHT SITUATIONAL EXAMPLE. unexpected runway crossing

Key Concept Culture. Related Concepts expression, structure. Global Context Personal and Cultural Expression

z Interim Report for May 2004 to October 2005 Aircrew Performance and Protection Branch Wright-Patterson AFB, OH AFRL-HE-WP-TP

Transportation Engineering II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee

Agenda Item 6-ATM Coordination (Airspace restructuring, AIS and SAR agreements)

Aircraft Stability and Control Prof. A. K. Ghosh Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur. Lecture- 25 Revision

Special Olympics Summer Sports Rules GOLF

People and Policies: the 7:30 a.m. Debates 31 OCTOBER 2008

FLIGHT PERFORMANCE AND PLANNING (2) PERFORMANCE

RiNo Railroad Crossing Connectivity Analysis. Stakeholder Workshop June 29, 2017

Monitoring road safety risk factors and measures SafetyCube

AEROSPACE STANDARD. Minimum Operational Performance Specification for Inflight Icing Detection Systems FOREWORD

Eastern Shore Islands Area of Interest Community Newsletter

Next Meeting 7:00 PM Tuesday June 8, 2010 Location: Mead Field (bring an airplane)

6.7 Aircraft Protection

New Airfield Risk Assessment / Categorisation

Summary Report of Public Comment Proceeding

Rules Modernization FAQs March 2018 Update

Table of Contents. Feature Article. Prevention of Traffic Accidents involving Elderly People

Measuring the Economic Performance of Australian Fisheries Management

HELIPORT DESIGN. with particular reference to PPR and Hospital Heliports WORKSHOP #2 HELIPORT DESIGN ADVISORY CIRCULAR 150/5390-2B

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW

FLIGHT TEST RISK ASSESSMENT THREE FLAGS METHOD

Wake Vortices OPERATIONS. Where do Wake Vortices come from? What are the characteristics of wake vortices? CLAUDE LELAIE Former Head of Flight Test

Accident Prevention Program

Fire Apparatus Operator Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting

International Search and Rescue Operations

Safety Standards Acknowledgement and Consent (SSAC) CAP 1395

Equine Trust Summer Scholarship

Fire Service Training & Measuring Competency. Colin Murray Head of Airside Operations, Edinburgh Airport, UK.

Transcription:

U.S. AIR FORCE/USACE FRANGIBILITY UPDATE 20 October, 2014, IES/ALC 2014 Orlando, FL Robert Dinan US Air Force AF Civil Engineer Center

U.S. AIR FORCE AND USACE FRANGIBILITY UPDATE Approving Officials at AF/USACE often asked to approve designs or provide prescriptive details for airfield structures to meet frangibility requirements. DoD Unified Facilities Criteria reference FAA Advisory Circulars reference or reference/adopt ICAO frangibility criteria (ICAO Annex 14 part 6) Manufactures have difficult time understanding which frangibility requirements apply to which airfield devices. Are frangible couplings sufficient for some devices? Design for impact from landing gear, fuselage, or wing? How to measure force, derive energy Is testing required Are finite element calculations sufficient? Approving Officials have difficult time answering the questions because of gaps in criteria Joint Airfield Frangibility Study Group (JAFSG) formed to bring international stakeholders together to revisit and close gaps in existing criteria.

U.S. AIR FORCE AND USACE FRANGIBILITY UPDATE US Air Force Towers Program Office Frangible Glide Slope Tower Development Includes Frangibilty Criteria Revision Research US Air Force Civil Engineer Center/USACE Revise Current Airfield Frangibility Requirements Align with FAA criteria wherever possible Attempt to Influence ICAO criteria where possible Collaboration with ongoing FAA projects Formation and Participation in Joint Airfield Frangibility Study Group (JAFSG)

MOTIVATION FOR JAFSG Better Understand Existing Criteria Fill Criteria Gaps for common Airfield Structures ILS Localizer Arrays and Supporting Platforms ILS Glide Slope Tower Fences in Zone of Frangibility Other sign posts, runway marker signs What Needs to be Provided in Approval submittal? Testing Procedures? Rigid vs. Soft Wing Impactor Instrumentation Requirements? Standard Methods Procedure to Derive Energy from Measurements Numerical Analysis? What type of finite analysis to verify frangibility and reduce testing requirements

MOTIVATION FOR JAFSG Revisit Frangibility Criteria Limits? Not intent to increase frangibility requirements Better quantify the frangibility of existing devices Revise criteria to include broader classes of structures i.e Allow higher forces for impacts with very low energy transfer to aircraft? More clearly define which structures or frangible devices can be approved using static tests frangible links Provide prescriptive designs where possible

FRANGIBILITY EVENTS THIS WEEK This Weeks Frangibility Events : Tuesday: Airfield Frangibility Criteria: Questions with Current Standards Mr. Clint Rooks, Select Engineering Services, Projects with FAA and Air Force Towers Program Office Dr. Dan Duke, TriDynamic Solutions, Projects with USAF Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) and USACE Thursday: Airfield Frangibility Standard Development: Historical to Future Dr. Jaap Wigenraad, formerly with Netherlands Aerospace Laboratory Dr. Dan Duke, TriDynamic Solutions, Projects with (AFCEC) and USACE Friday: Joint Airfield Frangibility Study Group (JAFSG) 2 nd Biannual meeting: Technical Meeting Participation and Presentations from Distinguished Members who assisted with developing existing criteria Technical Presentations and Discussions on Ongoing Research Opportunity To get input from community

PARTICIPATION IN JAFSG ENCOURAGED Input from ALL stakeholders is critical. Participation is Encouraged and Appreciated Topics of Interest How Stakeholders are designing and getting approval under current criteria What obstacles are currently faced? Identify Gaps being encountered Request for historical reports, analysis Added to frangibility repository Requests for Intellectual Property Protection will be honored, reports will not be further disseminated unless specifically approved by your organization Ongoing effort over next 1+ years. Hope to meet informally every 6 months at other venues where critical mass of stakeholders are already gathered, i.e SWIFT, IES/ALC

QUESTIONS/COMMENTS? CONTACT INFO: