PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SOLUTIONS ANDREA HARTH, PE, PTOE TEC ENGINEERING, INC.

Similar documents
Designing for Pedestrian Safety in Washington, DC

HAWK Signal. Pedestrian Safety. Illinois Traffic Engineering & Safety Conference Thursday, October 21, 2010

Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Shawn Turner, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute

IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS. Guidelines for Marked Crosswalks

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Town of Windsor Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines

Pedestrian Treatments by

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

DPS 201 RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON (RRFB)

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

In response to your request for information on mid-block pedestrian crossing policies and guidelines, the following information is enclosed:

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TREATMENTS

STEP. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons. Safe Transportation for Every Pedestrian

Downtown Signals Traffic Analysis

Transportation Education Series (TES) Alaska

Parisi TRANSPORTATION CONSUtllHG

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

Project Team. Refined Pedestrian Crossing Toolbox. Problem Statement. Aerial of Study Corridor. Crossing Accommodations and Pedestrian Fatalities

GLOSSARY CROSSWALK. CROSSING TYPES

Broadway Street Pedestrian Safety Study Cass Street to 700 Feet North of Randall Avenue

Guidelines for Pedestrian Treatments at Uncontrolled Locations January 18, 2018

Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STATISTICS

Designing for Pedestrian Safety. Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016

UNCONTROLLED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES

MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION AREA DESCRIPTION. DATE: December 8, 2017

C. Brian Shamburger, P.E., PTOE Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. State of Texas Registered Firm #928

Establishing Procedures and Guidelines for Pedestrian Treatments at Uncontrolled Locations

POTENTIAL PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

PART 4 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

Today s presentation

November 20, 2017 // 6:00 p.m. // 1 s t Floor Conference Room 301 Walnut Street, Windsor, CO AGENDA

Appendix A. Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines. Appendix A: Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines Knox to Oak Ridge Greenway Master Plan

C. Best Practice Pedestrian Treatment Toolbox

STREET CROSSINGS. Module 4. Part 2: Countermeasures

Bicycle Facilities Planning

Mid-block Crosswalks Law, Planning, Design & Liability

AGENDA ITEM F-5 Public Works

Traffic Signals at Bike Boulevards

Memorandum MAR or in part.

Guidance for Installation of Pedestrian Crosswalks on Michigan State Trunkline Highways

Ashburn Road (SR 641) and Suzanne Hope Way/Broad Run High School Entrance

Bicycle Boulevards and Neighborhood Greenways

Traffic Engineering Update on Bike/Ped Topics. Marc Lipschultz, P.E. PTOE Central Office Traffic Engineering Division

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street

Ohio Department of Transportation Edition of the OMUTCD It s Here!

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS TRAFFIC AND PARKING COMMISSION

Safety Benefits of Raised Medians and Pedestrian Refuge Areas. FHWA Safety Program.

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX

1 To provide direction to Administration when determining the appropriate Pedestrian Crossing Control Device for a particular location.

Engineering Countermeasures for Transportation Safety. Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

Crosswalk Policy Revisions & Pedestrian & Bicycle Connection Plans. Presentation to Sanibel City Council July 16, 2013

Guidelines for Pedestrian Treatments at Uncontrolled Locations

Attachment No. 4 Approved by National Committee Council

City of Novato Uncontrolled Crosswalk Policy

Improving Pedestrian Safety with Engineering and Technology

Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies

System Performance Innovation FACT Sheet Hawk Pedestrian Beacon

What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety

Marshall Metcalf, P.E. Dan Mlacnik, P.E. Division of Highways/District 6 February 24, 2015

TODAY S WEBINAR AGENDA

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

SCOPE Application, Design, Operations,

Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System (PEDSAFE)

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT ROUNDABOUTS

Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Bruce Friedman and Scott Wainwright FHWA MUTCD Team

Crossing Treatments Methodology Page 1 of 22

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

REDUCING COLLISIONS AT HIGH CRASH LOCATIONS

The DC Pedestrian Master Plan

C/CAG. Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit. San Mateo-Foster City School District JUNE 2013

MEMORANDUM. Nick Hutchinson, P.E., City Engineer Public Services Area Project Management Services Unit

F L E T C H E R A V E N U E

Document 2 - City of Ottawa Pedestrian Crossover (PXO) Program

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

ADA Training Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) 2018 MnDOT

MEMORANDUM. Discussion of the planned crosswalk improvement on Mount Vernon Road near Stratham Drive

City of Memphis. Pedestrian Facility Design Toolkit DRAFT. January PREPARED BY: Alta Planning + Design

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

LAKE-TO-LAKES TRAIL. City Planning Commission October 7, 2014

Retrofitting Urban Arterials into Complete Streets

City of Scotts Valley CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Transportation Planning Division

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Guide Recommendations and Case Study. FHWA Safety Program.

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

PRODUCED BY TRIBAL TECH FOR THE OKLAHOMA STATE INNOVATION COUNCIL WITH THE SUPPORT OF A 2017 INNOVATION

Overview of Pinellas County Pedestrian Safety Programs and Initiatives

What's in the 2012 California MUTCD for Pedestrians, Bicyclists, and School Areas?

Report (Revised November 2010)

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

Transcription:

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SOLUTIONS ANDREA HARTH, PE, PTOE TEC ENGINEERING, INC.

Pedestrian Safety 2017 Pedestrian Crashes in Ohio Crash Severity Number % Fatal Crash 141 4.9% Injury Crash 2546 89.1% Property Damage Crash 172 6.0% Grand Total 2859 100.0% Contributing Factors Number % Failure To Yield 674 23.6% Improper Crossing 469 16.4% Unknown 363 12.7% Darting 183 6.4% None-Motorist 172 6.0% Failure To Control 137 4.8% Lying And/Or Illegally In Roadway 94 3.3% Other Improper Action 83 2.9% Traffic Control Number % No Controls 903 31.6% Pavement Markings 780 27.3% Traffic Signal 663 23.2% Stop Sign 175 6.1% Crosswalk Lines 145 5.1% Walk/Do Not Walk 74 2.6% Not Reported 42 1.5% Person (Flagger, Officer) 33 1.2% Other 23 0.8% Traffic Flashers 8 0.3% School Zone 8 0.3% Construction Barricade 4 0.1% Railroad Crossbucks 1 0.0% Grand Total 2859 100.0%

Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018 Pedestrian Treatments Signed Crossings Types of Signs Additional Features Flashing Beacons RRFB In Pavement Lights Controlled Crossings Mid Block Traffic Signal HAWK (High-Intensity Activated crosswalk beacon) Other Considerations Refuge Islands Curb Bump Outs High Visibility Crosswalks

Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018 Uncontrolled Crossings Signage High Visibility Pavement Markings Ladder Continental Advance Yield Markings Lighting where possible

Geometric Improvements Uncontrolled Crossings Increase visibility and reduce exposure Examples Refuge Island Curb Bump outs Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018

RRFB Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon Rapid Strobe-like flasher Shows High yielding rates Sustained yield rate Often Solar Powered Average Cost $15,000 Pedestrian Activated Crossings Recent FHWA RRFB news: Approval rescinded by FHWA in December 2017 New Interim in Approval (21) March 2018 April 2018 ODOT received blanket approval for all locations All installations must be documented and inventoried Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018

Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018 Pedestrian Activated Crossings Flashing Sign Overhead or Side Mounted Span Wire or Mast Arms Flashing Beacons Traditional Flash Pattern Overhead or Side Mounted Span Wire or Mast Arms

In Pavement Lights Passive or Active Actuation Hardwired or Wireless options Average Cost $18,000 Pedestrian Activated Crossings Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018

Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018 Controlled Crossing Signalized Crosswalk Most effective with immediate actuation Should be coordinated with adjacent signals Maintenance is important Cost $80,000-$100,000

Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018 Controlled Crossing HAWK Signal High Intensity Activated Cross Walk Pedestrian Activated Average Cost $57,000 Can be coordinated with other signals

How do I know if I need a crossing? 1. MUTCD Signal Warrants (Warrant 4) 2. NCHRP Report 562 (Hamilton County) 3. City of Boulder Method Limitations of Warrants -Consolidating crossings -Newer destinations

Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018 How do I know if I need a crossing? MUTCD Signal Warrants

What type of crossing? NCHRP Report 562 Step 1 Choose Worksheet based on speed Step 2- Peak Hour Ped Volume > 20 Move to Step 3 (14 for > ) < 20 consider refuge islands, curb extension etc. Step 3-Does the crossing meet the pedestrian volume warrant? Yes-a signal should be considered No-move so step 4 Step 4-Total Pedestrian Delay (Dp) Based on walking speed, crossing distance, Major Road volume/flow rate, average pedestrian delay Step 5-Select Treatment Expected motorist compliance (high or low) Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018

What type of crossing? NCHRP Report 562 Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018

What type of crossing? City of Boulder Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018

Roadway Configuration # of Lanes crossed to refuge What type of crossing? # of multiple threat lanes per crossing 1,500-9,000 vpd 9,000-12,000 vpd 12,000-15,000 vpd >15,000 vpd 2 Lanes (one way street) 2 1 A B C E A B C E B B C E B C C E 2 Lanes (two way street) 2 0 A B C E A B C E B B C E B C C E 3 lanes with Raised Median 1 or 2 0 or 1 A B D E A C D E B D D E C D D E 3 Lanes with Striped Median 3 0 or 1 C C D E C C D E C C D E C D D E 4 Lanes (two way street) 4 2 A D D E B D D E B D D E D D D E 5 lanes with Raised Median 2 or 3 2 A B D E B C D E B C D E C C D E 5 Lanes with Striped Median 5 2 D D D E D D D E D D D E D D D E 6 Lanes 3 to 6 4 F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F A. Install marked crosswalk with enhanced road side signs B. Install marked crosswalk and in-road (bollard) signs Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018

Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018 Roadway Configuration # of Lanes crossed to refuge # of multiple threat lanes per crossing What type of crossing? 1,500-9,000 vpd 9,000-12,000 vpd 12,000-15,000 vpd >15,000 vpd 2 Lanes (one way street) 2 1 A B C E A B C E B B C E B C C E 2 Lanes (two way street) 2 0 A B C E A B C E B B C E B C C E 3 lanes with Raised Median 1 or 2 0 or 1 A B D E A C D E B D D E C D D E 3 Lanes with Striped Median 3 0 or 1 C C D E C C D E C C D E C D D E 4 Lanes (two way street) 4 2 A D D E B D D E B D D E D D D E 5 lanes with Raised Median 2 or 3 2 A B D E B C D E B C D E C C D E 5 Lanes with Striped Median 5 2 D D D E D D D E D D D E D D D E 6 Lanes 3 to 6 4 F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F C. Install marked crosswalk and geometric improvements to reduce ped exposure D. Install crosswalk, pedestrian activated RRFB and geometric improvements

What type of crossing? Roadway Configuration # of Lanes crossed to refuge # of multiple threat lanes per crossing 1,500-9,000 vpd 9,000-12,000 vpd 12,000-15,000 vpd >15,000 vpd 2 Lanes (one way street) 2 1 A B C E A B C E B B C E B C C E 2 Lanes (two way street) 2 0 A B C E A B C E B B C E B C C E 3 lanes with Raised Median 1 or 2 0 or 1 A B D E A C D E B D D E C D D E 3 Lanes with Striped Median 3 0 or 1 C C D E C C D E C C D E C D D E 4 Lanes (two way street) 4 2 A D D E B D D E B D D E D D D E 5 lanes with Raised Median 2 or 3 2 A B D E B C D E B C D E C C D E 5 Lanes with Striped Median 5 2 D D D E D D D E D D D E D D D E 6 Lanes 3 to 6 4 F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F E. Do not installed marked crosswalk at uncontrolled crossing. Reduce speed limit and install raised refuge median. F. Do not install uncontrolled crossing. Consider HAWK or Signal Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018

Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018 Other Pedestrian Ideas Advanced Walk at Signalized intersections Increases pedestrian visibility Puffin Crossing (U.K.) Near side mounted Smart detection Stays Walk until pedestrian is across In sidewalk LEDs (Holland) Use for distracted peds

Traffic Engineering Workshop 2018 Thank you! Resources http://www.pedbikeinfo.org https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/nchrp-562-improving-pedestrian-safety-at- Unsignalized-Crossings.pdf https://www-static.bouldercolorado.gov/docs/pedestrian-crossing-treamtment-installationguidelines-1-201307011719.pdf