Highway Safety Improvement

Similar documents
Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

Strategies for Making Multimodal Environments Safer. Kim Kolody Silverman, CH2M

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety

Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer

Engineering Countermeasures for Transportation Safety. Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

Systemic Safety. Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation March 2016

Pedestrian Safety and the Highway Safety Improvement Program

Speed Management Action Plan

Kansas Department of Transportation Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Intersections

FLORIDA STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN

Where Did the Road Go? The Straight and Narrow about Curves

Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool

Proven Safety Countermeasures. FHWA Office of Safety January 12, :00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time

Safety at Unsignalized Intersections. Unsignalized Intersections

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

Lessons Learned from the Minnesota County Road Safety Plans. Richard Storm CH2M HILL

RSTF Measurements and Status

SR/CR A1A PEDESTRIAN SAFETY & MOBILITY STUDY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

EMPHASIS AREA 1: PEDESTRIANS

Local Road Safety Plans

The DC Pedestrian Master Plan

Vision Zero Task Force June 28, 2017 COUNTERMEASURE PAIRING

Texas Intersection Safety Implementation Plan Workshop JUNE 2, 2016

Safety Emphasis Areas & Safety Project Development Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Tampa Bay

Designing for Pedestrian Safety in Washington, DC

SCOPE Application, Design, Operations,

Services and Funding from WSDOT Local Programs

A Strategic Highway Safety Plan. a coordinated and informed approach to reducing highway fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads.

SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGET SETTING. Transportation Subcommittee September 15, 2017

Desktop Reference for Crash Reduction Factors

Vision Zero & ITE. April 11, Toole Design Group. Jason DeGray, P.E., PTOE. Vision Zero & ITE

Lynchburg District Update

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

Table of Contents Kansas Highway Safety Improvement Program

Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

City of Grand Forks Staff Report

SBCAG STAFF REPORT Federal Transportation Improvement Program. MEETING DATE: January 19, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: 5E

Transportation Planning Division

MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION AREA DESCRIPTION. DATE: December 8, 2017

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Brief) Highlights for Arizona Practitioners. Arizona Department of Transportation

An Overview of the 2009 MUTCD

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Guide Recommendations and Case Study. FHWA Safety Program.

Rebecca Szymkowski, P.E., PTOE Wisconsin Department of Transportation. ITE Midwestern District Annual Meeting June 30, 2015

FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Focused Initiative & Complete Streets

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Transforming Traffic Signals to Support Sustainability: Applications, Ideas, & Research

INTERSECTION CRASH COUNTERMEASURES

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

Roundabouts. By: Nezamuddin, Valparaiso University. February 19, 2015

Designing for Pedestrian Safety. Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016

Road Diets. Presented by: Cristine Gowland, P.E. LADOTD District 62 March 2, 2016

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Road Safety Audit Course Participant Guidebook. August 22 & 23, Cleveland Avenue Columbus, Ohio

Road Safety Assessments. Lt. Bob McCurdy Williamson County Sheriff s s Office Marion, IL.

Now Let s Think Systemic

Crash Reduction Factors. Desktop Reference. for. Federal Highway Administration. U.S. Department of Transportation. Publication No.

IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS. Guidelines for Marked Crosswalks

Benefits of Center Line Rumble Strips on Rural 2-Lane Highways in Louisiana

Proven Practices. Improving Road Safety in Your County

In 2014, the number of traffic fatalities in the United States reached its lowest level at. Bicycle Collisions. Effective in Reducing

Ohio Department of Transportation Edition of the OMUTCD It s Here!

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

Highway Safety Improvement Program. Metro District Program Criteria

Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN

F L E T C H E R A V E N U E

Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Bruce Friedman and Scott Wainwright FHWA MUTCD Team

Local Road Safety Plans

Pinellas County Safety Initiatives

Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan Public Comment Report

Creating a Successful Pedestrian Safety Campaign. St. Paul, MN

DART Bus Crash Analysis. typical scenarios associated with selected crash types

2/25/2015. The Best of Pro Walk Pro Bike Pro Place Continuing Education. Today s presenters

Walk Friendly Communities Engineering Strategies. Carl Sundstrom Walk Friendly Communities Workshop Grandview, MO June 2015

Hillsborough Pedestrian Safety Action Plan 2015 Update. Hillsborough MPO BPAC May 2015

Development of Arlington County s Marked Crosswalk Guidelines. Jon Lawler, P.E. Design Engineer Arlington County, VA

APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact Jillian Massey at ext. 246 or

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

STEP. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons. Safe Transportation for Every Pedestrian

SHSP Action Plan Development. Intersection EA Team

RE: City of Portland Request to Experiment with HAWK/Bike signal

Reducing Fatalities and Serious Injuries on County Roads

VDOT BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT April 2017

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

Final Report for the Minnesota County Roadway Safety Plans. Prepared for

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

HAWK Signal. Pedestrian Safety. Illinois Traffic Engineering & Safety Conference Thursday, October 21, 2010

Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies

Annual Progress Report from VDOT on the Effect of the Aging Population on State Agencies

DRIVING ZERO FATALITIES TO A REALITY ILLINOIS LOCAL SAFETY INITIATIVE

MPO Staff Report MPO Technical Advisory Committee: December 13, 2017 MPO Executive Board: December 20, 2017

Transcription:

Highway Safety Improvement Tracy Turpin, PE. Highway Safety Improvement Program Manager Virginia Department of Transportation Presented at Chesapeake and Virginia Chapters of ATSSA Meeting October 13 th,2016

Introduction HSIP is a core program administered at the federal level by US department of Transportation FHWA office of safety. The primary objective of HSIP : To identify and improve locations where high concentration or risk of vehicle crashes that result in death or injuries and to implement strategies to attain VA towards Zero death vision. To make significant progress in reducing highway fatalities and serious injuries on all public roadways. HSIP project planning and development process have been developed in consultation with FHWA given the MAP-21 Act and FAST Act guidelines final ruling(policy) and funding provided. FAST Act builds on changes made by MAP-21 provisions to accelerate project delivery and promote innovation. VDOT s HSIP consists of the following programs: Highway Safety Program (HSP) Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program (BPSP) Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety (H-RGCP) Local Agency Safety Program (LASP). 2

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Virginia Traffic Deaths & Serious Injuries 2006-2015 1050 1000 950 900 850 800 750 700 650 600 1,026 961 775 740 718 753 700 636 23,000 21,000 19,000 17,000 15,000 13,000 11,000 9,000 7,000 5,000 21,260 11316 10018 8014 7,572 Deaths SHSP Target Serious Injuries SHSP Target 3

Safety Funding Plan $60,000,000 Highway Safety Improvement Funding Target (FY18-FY23) $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $- Prev FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Active Projects Future VDOT Projects Future Local Projects Bike & Ped 4

HSIP Implementation Guideline HSIP Implementation Process involves: Identification of High Crash Locations Analysis of Problems and Countermeasures Prioritization and Scheduling of Improvement Projects. HSIP applications submission and adding safety projects to Virginia Six-year improvement program (SYIP) will only be considered if HSIP Implementation guidelines are followed. HSIP Implementation Guideline contains High Level discussion on: HSIP Project Life Cycle. Highway Safety Program (HSP) Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program (BPSP) Highway Rail Grade Crossing Safety (H-RGCP) Local Agency Safety Program (LASP) 6

HSIP Project Tracking Tools In house developed project tracking tools. Tools ensures timely delivery of the HSIP funds and tracks VDOT HSIP projects in a more intuitive and useful way. Tools help project manager to improve schedule performance. Contact HSIP staffs for accessing to VDOT tableau project tracking tools. 7

HSP/BPSP Application- Smart Portal Smart Portal is one-stop-shop for submitting projects applications for various funding programs. HSIP partners should use Smart Portal for submitting projects applications for HSP and BPSP. H-RGCP and Systemic Improvement has been scheduled for next year development. Contact Portal administrator to obtain log-in credentials. https://smartportal.virginiahb2.org/#/ 8

Outside VDOT Resources HSIP additional Resources are obtained from OUTSIDE VDOT website Highway Safety Projects folder. Contact HSIP Staffs to obtain log-in credentials. 9

FHWA Preferred Safety Countermeasures 10

Traditional Vs Systemic Traditional approaches to safety focused on identifying high crash locations and constructing projects to address predominant concerns at these locations. Systemic approaches to safety focused on managing safety that typically involves lower unit cost improvement that are widely implemented based on high-risk factors. Systemic approach to safety is a data-driven process that involves analytical techniques to identify sites for potential safety improvement. Systemic approaches suggest HSIP projects for safety improvement that are not typically identified through traditional site analysis approach. MAP-21 places a significant emphasis on Systemic improvement as part of the safety management process. 12

Example Traditional Intersection Systemic Intersection Rebuild Intersection Move curb Add capacity Rebuild/replace signal Some R/W required Deploy flashing yellow arrow at 25 intersections Cost: $500K Schedule: 1 year Cost: $2-4 Million Schedule: 2-4 years Crash reduction 10-15 crashes/year Crash Reduction 36% of all left turn angle collisions 90 crashes/year 13

Systemic Projects Flashing Yellow Arrow Cost: $20K/intersection Crash Reduction: 36 % of left turn angle crashes Schedule: about a year 14

Systemic Projects High-Visibility Traffic Signal Backplates Cost: $7-11K/intersection (much less if doing other work) Crash Reduction: 15% of all intersection crashes 29% of fatal/injury crashes Schedule: less than a year FHWA s proven safety countermeasure 15

Systemic Projects Road Diets Cost: $20-30K/mile for pavement marking changes Crash Reduction: 20-47 % of all crashes particularly rear end, angle, and sideswipe crashes Risk reduction for peds and bikes Schedule: less than a year if coordinated with resurfacing FHWA proven safety countermeasure 16

Systemic Projects Signal Timing Elements: Cycle length, split, Offset, Yellow and Red Clearance intervals, pedestrian clearance interval, pedestrian phase selection. Cost: $5K/intersection Crash Reduction: 20-33 % of all crashes Schedule: less than a year 17

Systemic Projects Ped Refuge Islands Cost: $20-30K/location if no R/W needed Crash Reduction: 40-45 % of all crashes Schedule: 1-2 years FHWA proven safety countermeasure 18

Systemic Projects Other Ped/Bike Projects Ped countdown Signals $1200/Each Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon $30-40K per location HAWK Signal $90-120K per location FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasure High-Visibility Crosswalk $15K/intersection Green Bike Lanes in conflict areas $20/square foot 19

Systemic Projects Curve Delineation Cost: $5K/location Crash Reduction: 30-50% of all crashes Schedule: less than 1 year FHWA proven safety countermeasure 20

Systemic Projects Rumble Strips Cost: $7K/mile center line RS $12K/mile shoulder RS Crash Reduction: 44-64% - center line RS 36% - shoulder RS Schedule: less than 1 year FHWA proven safety countermeasure 21

Tracy Turpin, P.E. Email: tracy.turpin@vdot.virginia.gov Phone: 804-786-6610 Questions