Aditi Misra Dr. Kari E. Watkins Dr. Christopher A. Le Dantec

Similar documents
Update on Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, & Trail Planning. Presented to TCC November 21, 2014

Master Transportation Plan Bicycle Element Survey

2017 North Texas Regional Bicycle Opinion Survey

SAN FRANCISCO WOMEN AND BIKING A CASE STUDY ON THE USE OF SAN FRANCISCO BIKE LANES SYNTHESIS

2. what apply crowdmapping tools

EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE NO. 20. Issue Date: July 1, 2011

MTP BICYCLE ELEMENT UPDATE. November 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

Measuring and growing active modes of transport in Auckland

Driverless Vehicles Potential Influence on Bicyclist Facility Preferences

Cascade Bicycle Club Strategic Plan

Moving Ahead. (Community Engagement) Chapter Three

Performance Metrics: [Making lemonade out of federal and state Requirements]

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Chapter VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Vision. Mission. Goals and Objectives CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST.

Evaluation of San Diego's First CicloSDias Open Streets Event

When composing the study, our primary source for content analysis was a study

Strategic Plan for Active Mobility Phase I: Bicycle Mobility

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan Update

Transportation 2040 Update: Eudora Public Input As of June 1, 2017

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

PBIC Webinar. How to Create a Bicycle Safety Action Plan: Planning for Safety [IMAGE] Oct. 2, 2014, 2 pm

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OUTREACH: INTERACTIVE MAP SUMMARY REPORT- 10/03/14

Public Transportation and Bicycle & Pedestrian Stakeholder Webinar. April 11, :30 PM

San Ramon Elementary School. Travel Plan

2017 Florida Commuter Transportation Summit

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

Living Streets Policy

Rerouting Mode Choice Models: How Including Realistic Route Options Can Help Us Understand Decisions to Walk or Bike

Bike lanes for. Everyone

ONTARIO BIKE SUMMIT 2012 Louisa Mursell Projects Director Phone: /

Vallecito Elementary School. Travel Plan

Transportation Issues Poll for New York City

Rail Station Fact Sheet CentrePort/DFW Airport Station

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study

Community Input. Chapter 2. Community Input Chapter 2

Cycling Master Plan Community Engagement Session WELCOME

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Community Transportation Plan Acknowledgements

FOR INFORMATION ONLY

Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings

Investment in Active Transport Survey

McGrath Boulevard Project Development Public Meeting #2 May 28 th, 2015 East Somerville Community School

ABOUT THIS STUDY The Tenderloin-Little Saigon Community-Based Transportation Plan

Developing a Safer Cycling Strategy for the ACT ACRS Conference August 2012

Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Creating Safe Routes to School Programs for Tribal Communities

Lessons from Copenhagen. John L Bowman 2013

NACTO Designing Cities 2014 Dongho Chang, City Traffic Engineer October 23, 2014

Developing a Birmingham Transport Space Allocation policy. David Harris Transport Policy Manager Economy Directorate Birmingham City Council

The Pedestrian Safety Action Plan

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Gdynia s bicycle model

Active Transportation on the Rise

Barriers to Alternative Transportation Modes RTP Public Input Survey - Summary of Responses -

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Florida DOT Case Study

Seattle Department of Transportation. Web Panel Survey February 2018

WELLS WAY GREEN PARK ROAD

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

Sustainable Transportation Initiatives and Plans in Caledon

Categorizing Cyclists: What Do We Know? Insights from Portland, OR

Traffic Safety Barriers to Walking and Bicycling Analysis of CA Add-On Responses to the 2009 NHTS

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016

PLAN: Moving bikeways from concept to completion. Austin, Texas

Cultivating Senior Advocacy for Healthy & Walkable Neighborhoods. Jaime Fearer, AICP Planning & Policy Manager

Rail Station Fact Sheet University of Dallas Station

Assessment of Infrastructure and Institutional Framework for Integration of Cycling and Mass Rapid Transit System: The case study of Taipei

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Access in Transit Oriented Developments. Bruce Wright Chairman, Fairfax Advocates for Better Bicycling April, 2009

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Pre-Plan Consultation Summary

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

WELCOME! Please complete a comment sheet as we value your feedback. 4 pm to 8 pm. September 15, Hosted by: AECOM on behalf of City of Calgary

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

Bellevue Downtown Association Downtown Bike Series

Public Event 1 Community Workshops

Webinar: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Protected Cycling Facilities: Lessons from Five Cities

City of Waterloo Complete Streets Policy

Kevin Manaugh Department of Geography McGill School of Environment

Facilitating Suburban Bike-to-Rail

Trails that Transform: The Economic Impact of Bicycle Tourism

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Walking and Cycling Action Plan Summary. A Catalyst for Change The Regional Transport Strategy for the west of Scotland

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study. Old Colony Planning Council

ACCOMMODATING THE 8 TO 80. OTEC October 26, 2016

DRAFT MOVING FORWARD RHODE ISLAND BICYCLE MOBILITY PLAN 2018 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY IN ASSOCIATION WITH

WEST YORKSHIRE LTP CYCLE PROSPECTUS

2014 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Study Evaluation Tools Leslie A. Meehan, AICP MPO Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting April 1, 2015

Medical and Dental Care in Hawaii

Public Consultation Centre

No-car lanes in Tyneside results from modelling and stakeholder analysis

CHAPTER 3: Vision Statement and Goals

Transcription:

Cycle Atlanta Aditi Misra School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Dr. Kari E. Watkins School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Dr. Christopher A. Le Dantec School Literature, Media, and Communication

7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 2

7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 3

7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 4

7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 5

Data on cyclists is limited: Small and dispersed group Missed in traffic counts Agencies lack funds earmarked for bicycle counts Frequent use of stated preference surveys Cycling models are inadequate: Included in demand models as an approximate percentage of total demand Trip distribution and mode choice often ignores cyclists Route choice models do not consider preference variation based on demographics

Most of Atlanta s bicycle network miles have a level of service ranking of E or worse 1 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 7

There is a lack of data on the state of bicycle infrastructure in Atlanta Half of trips made are < 3 miles, but only 1.8% of those trips are made by bike 2 Cycling can reduce greenhouse gas emission, congestion and provide healthy lifestyle 3 Cyclists prefer dedicated infrastructure 4 Involve citizens to get bicycle data to inform infrastructure decisions 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 8

How can we achieve this?

Crowdsourcing! Greater public participation Removes location and time constraint Diverse stakeholder involvement Anonymous participation option Ideal for dispersed user base Less cost intensive than traditional methods MORE DATA FOR BETTER PLANNING!! 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 10

Crowdsourcing System Components: Problem: Data Collection/User Feedback Our Project Organizer: City of Atlanta, Atlanta Regional Commission, Georgia Tech Participants: Local Cyclists Platform: Smartphone based 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 11

Our Precursor: Cycle Tracks, San Francisco 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 12

What did we develop?

Two New Components of Data Collection 1. Demographics 2. Issues and Assets 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 15

Cycle Atlanta: Demographic Categories Age Gender Ethnicity Home Income Less Than 18 Male White Less than $20,000 18-24 Female African American $20,000-$39,999 25-34 Asian $40,000-$59,999 35-44 Native American $60,000-$74,999 45-54 Pacific Islander $75,000-$99,999 55-64 Multi-racial $100,000 or greater 65+ Hispanic/Mexican/Latino Other Cycle Frequency Daily Several times per week Several times per month Less than once a month Rider History Since childhood Several years One year or less Just trying it/just started 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 16

Rider Type Strong and fearless Enthused and Confident Comfortable, but cautious Interested, but concerned

Assets Cycle Atlanta Data Collection + Bike parking + Bike shops or repair kits + Public restrooms + Secret passage + Water fountains Issues Pavement issue Traffic signal Enforcement Bike parking Bike lane issue Framework: Infrastructure

How does Cycle Atlanta work?

Storing Your Demographic Information 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 20

Recording Your Trip 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 21

Providing More Information 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 22

Viewing Your Trip 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 23

Viewing Your Notes 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 24

Who is using it?

Rider Demographic Distribution N=881 N=866 N=684 N=824 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 26

Rider Characteristic Distribution N=876 N=504 N=873 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 27

Rider Type Distribution Across Age 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 28

Rider Type Distribution Across Gender 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 29

Rider Type Distribution Across Income 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 30

Rider Type Distribution Across Ethnicity 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 31

Where is it used?

7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 33

Looking forward

Route choice analysis Integration with City of Atlanta work order Infrastructure ranking tools for city & region Create mapping tools using data

Magnetic Wrist Band http://vimeo.com/73055934 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 37

References 1.Tilahun, N. Y., D. M. Levinson, and K. J. Krizek. Trails, lanes, or traffic: Valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 41, May 2007, pp. 287 301. 2.Krizek, K. J., P. J. Johnson, and N. Tilahun. Gender Differences in Bicycling Behavior and Facility Preferences. Research on Women s Issues in Transportation, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. 2004. 3.Atlanta Regional Commission. Atlanta Region Bicycle Transportation & Pedestrian Walkways Plan. 2007 4.League of American Bicyclists, 2010, http://www.bikeleague.org/resources/reports/pdfs/nhts09.pdf 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db82.pdf 6.International Transport Forum, 2010, http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/jtrc/environment/co2/usa.pdf 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 38

Questions? Thank You! Aditi Misra amisra7@gatech.edu 7/8/2014 Misra,Watkins,LeDantec 39