Echo Sounder Evaluation of XBT Drop Rate off the coast of Florida

Similar documents
BOTTOM MAPPING WITH EM1002 /EM300 /TOPAS Calibration of the Simrad EM300 and EM1002 Multibeam Echo Sounders in the Langryggene calibration area.

ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Mini-project 3 Tennis ball launcher

Drift Characteristics of Paroscientific pressure sensors

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY GREAT OUSE AND 100 FT DRAIN QUARTERLY BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DECEMBER 2013 SITE SURVEY REPORT NO. H6787

TRIAXYS Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Comparison Study

14/10/2013' Bathymetric Survey. egm502 seafloor mapping

Systematic Errors in the Hydrographic Data and Their Effect on Global Heat Content Calculations

Assessing the Accuracy of High Spatial Resolution Effort Data

Robin J. Beaman. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia.

Temperature, salinity, density, and the oceanic pressure field

SeaSmart. Jonathan Evans

A Wind Profiling Platform for Offshore Wind Measurements and Assessment. Presenter: Mark Blaseckie AXYS Technologies Inc.

CORRELATION BETWEEN SONAR ECHOES AND SEA BOTTOM TOPOGRAPHY

Real Time Surveying GPS and HYDRO Software for Tide and Swell Compensation

Technical Report: Accuracy Testing of 4iiii Innovations PRECISION Powermeter Technology

Ship waves in Tallinn Bay: Experimental and numerical study

Executive Summary Security Devices International Inc. (SDI) Blunt Impact Projectile

LAB : Using A Spark Timer

Physics 2048 Test 1 Fall 2000 Dr. Jeff Saul Name:

THE BALLISTIC PENDULUM

SPEED LOGS & ECHO SOUNDERS

SPEED LOGS & ECHO SOUNDERS

How we calibrate the Wave Height and Period Measurements from the Gravitational Acceleration Wave Buoys in RMIC/AP

Best Practice Guidance for Assessing the Financial Performance of Fishing Gear: Industry-led gear trials

Chapter 5: Methods and Philosophy of Statistical Process Control

S-44 edition 5 The IHO s New Standard For Hydrographic Surveys Chris Howlett Head of Seabed Data Centre United Kingdom Hydrographic Office

Hydrographic Surveying at The Port of London

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004

Statesville, NC. Results of AM ASHRAE 110 Laboratory Fume Hood Performance Evaluations Venturi Hood

Compiled by Uwe Dornbusch. Edited by Cherith Moses

WAVE IMPACTS DUE TO STEEP FRONTED WAVES

Computational Analysis of Oil Spill in Shallow Water due to Wave and Tidal Motion Madhu Agrawal Durai Dakshinamoorthy

Applying Hooke s Law to Multiple Bungee Cords. Introduction

CONSTRUCTION OF LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL ON THE SAINT LAWRENCE TIDAL CURRENT CONDITIONS IN THE LEVIS AREA

6 Motion in Two Dimensions BIGIDEA Write the Big Idea for this chapter.

Hydroacoustic surveys of Otsego Lake s pelagic fish community,

page - Laboratory Exercise #5 Shoreline Processes

Improving the Bus Network through Traffic Signalling. Henry Axon Transport for London

On the Challenges of Analysis and Design of Turret-Moored FPSOs in Squalls

Dynamic Positioning Control Augmentation for Jack-up Vessels

The Next Generation Easy-to-Deploy (ETD) Tsunami Assessment Buoy

Feral Wild Boar and Deer in the Forest of Dean

Axial Base (PN3A) Medium-Power (MP) J-box

Estimating the Clearance Depth Required in UXO Contaminated Areas NSGG

Projectile Motion INTRODUCTION. Time-of-flight vs. Initial Velocity. Projectile Motion

PUBLISHED PROJECT REPORT PPR850. Optimisation of water flow depth for SCRIM. S Brittain, P Sanders and H Viner

Sensor Platform Project Marine Trials Bidders Conference. Fundy Ocean Research Center for Energy fundyforce.ca

Regional Analysis of Extremal Wave Height Variability Oregon Coast, USA. Heidi P. Moritz and Hans R. Moritz

Challenges in determining water surface in airborne LiDAR topobathymetry. Amar Nayegandhi, Dewberry 15 th Annual JALBTCX Workshop, June 11 th 2014

National Maritime Center

Transactions on Ecology and the Environment vol 12, 1996 WIT Press, ISSN

Traffic Parameter Methods for Surrogate Safety Comparative Study of Three Non-Intrusive Sensor Technologies

An Engineering Approach to Precision Ammunition Development. Justin Pierce Design Engineer Government and International Contracts ATK Sporting Group

Interim Operating Procedures for SonTek RiverSurveyor M9/S5

Evaluation of the Klein HydroChart 3500 Interferometric Bathymetry Sonar for NOAA Sea Floor Mapping

BUYER S GUIDE AQUAlogger 530WTD

MARK SCHEME for the October/November 2014 series 0460 GEOGRAPHY. 0460/41 Paper 4 (Alternative to Coursework), maximum raw mark 60

Lab Report. Objectives:

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

Tutorial for the. Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3

ADCP data ranges from Oceanus and Wecoma Jules Hummon July 9, 2013 DRAFT

Pitching Performance and Age

1.0 Converting. 1. What is the speed of a person walking at 3.1 mph in m/s? Show your work and box your answer (check your units)

Observing the behavioral response of herring exposed to mid-frequency sonar signals

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

How to Do Flight Testing for TARC. Trip Barber NAR TARC Manager

Hydroacoustic survey of Otsego Lake, 2004

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SEVENTH REGULAR SESSION August 2011 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

MOUNTAIN FLYING TEST

Statistical Analysis of PGA Tour Skill Rankings USGA Research and Test Center June 1, 2007

FFI RAPPORT SENSITIVITY OF LYBINS TRANSMISSION LOSS DUE TO VARIATIONS IN SOUND SPEED. HJELMERVIK Karl Thomas FFI/RAPPORT-2006/01356

INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY STANDARDS

Little Spokane River Stream Gage Report: Deadman Creek, Dragoon Creek, and the West Branch of the Little Spokane River

Measuring Discharge in Shallower Rivers: ADCPs go from Rio to Pro

Full scale VIV response measurements of a drill pipe in Gulf of Mexico loop currents (OMAE )

About us. Try us to trace your network!

Pitching Performance and Age

QUESTION 1. Sketch graphs (on the axes below) to show: (1) the horizontal speed v x of the ball versus time, for the duration of its flight;

Flow in a shock tube

L E S S O N : Tsunami Simulation Experiment

APPENDIX 3E HYDROACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF FISH POPULATIONS IN COPCO AND IRON GATE RESERVOIRS, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER

NavyFIELD. - Submarine Manual -

ADCP Measurement of the Blue Nile under High Sediment Conditions

USCGC HEALY WAGB-20 Final Report RD Instruments Inc. Ocean Surveyor 75 khz Prepared by: Ron Hippe Commissioning Dates: 3/27/2002-3/30/2002

Waves. G. Cowles. General Physical Oceanography MAR 555. School for Marine Sciences and Technology Umass-Dartmouth

MAR 110 LECTURE #14 Ocean Waves

Measured broadband reverberation characteristics in Deep Ocean. [E.Mail: ]

An Atlas of Oceanic Internal Solitary Waves (February 2004) by Global Ocean Associates Prepared for Office of Naval Research Code 322 PO

Hydrographic Surveying Methods, Applications and Uses

WindProspector TM Lockheed Martin Corporation

Crave the Wave, Feb 16, 2008 TEAM Mentor Invitational Score Rank

BathySurvey A Trimble Access hydrographic survey module

Aalborg Universitet. Published in: Proceedings of Offshore Wind 2007 Conference & Exhibition. Publication date: 2007

STUDY ON TSUNAMI PROPAGATION INTO RIVERS

Accident Report. Grounding Sanga Na Langa. 30 March 2006 Class C

Kinematics-Projectiles

Sea Search Operations AF 447 A February 2010

Fine Scale Baleen Whale Behavior Observed Via Tagging Over Daily Time Scales

In ocean evaluation of low frequency active sonar systems

Transcription:

Echo Sounder Evaluation of XBT Drop Rate off the coast of Florida Lockheed Martin Sippican Grant Johnson Engineering Project Manager Ocean Products 9/22/2010 1

Introduction New fall rate evaluation approach Echo Sounder Distinctive probe bottom strike Preliminary results Deep Blue probes New probes fall more consistently Some Old probe populations appear slower than New probes Echo Sounder approach Improved method of fall rate evaluation Encourage community-wide usage 2

New Fall Rate Evaluation Approach Echo Sounder with Probe Bottom Strike 9/22/2010 3

Location and Facilities USA Riviera Beach, Florida Sea Trials Lockheed Martin base facility Lockheed Martin 50 vessel 35 km off the coast Relatively flat bottom 530 m average depth 4

50 Sea Hawk Large aft deck Custom mounting Echo sounder transducer Probe launchers Platform consistency 5

Transducer Mounting Echo sounder transducer Over the side mount 18 below water line 6

Echo Sounder Depth Range 0.2 200m @ 200 khz 0.5 1500m @ 33 khz 1.0 6000m @ 12 khz Accuracy ±0.1% of depth (sound velocity corrected) 7

System Diagram SHIP GPS PC-A PC-B PC-C PC Echotrac MKIII MK21 DAQ MK21 DAQ MK21 DAQ Launcher A Launcher B Launcher C Transducer 8

System Diagram SHIP PC s time synchronized with GPS GPS PC-A PC-B PC-C PC Echotrac MKIII MK21 DAQ MK21 DAQ MK21 DAQ Launcher A Launcher B Launcher C Transducer 9

Location of 3 Launchers 10

Probe Bottom Strike 11

Reliable Impact Signature 12

Data Analysis Test Data Probe T Profiles ID Impact Times Depth from FRE* Depth from Probe & FRE Depth Data Probe Drop Times Correlate Drop Times with Depth Data Error Analysis Depth from Echo Sounder *FRE = Fall Rate Equation 13

Probe Sea Trials 9/22/2010 14

Definition New Probes Manufactured after July 2008 Same probe design Decreased gap between probe nose and body Included additional space for Vexar netting Ensures good fit between nose and body Investigation found small Nose-to-Body gaps Older Probe sample population Average of 0.50 mm New Probe sample population Average of 0.21 mm 15

Four Data Sets May 2009 November 2009 May 2010 All data combined 16

Echo Sounder Results May 2009 Sea Trial Data 9/22/2010 17

Deep Blues New Probes 18

Deep Blues Before Aug 2008 19

Deep Blues: May 2009 Summary Deep Blue (Before Aug '08) Sample Size 28 Deep Blue (New) Sample Size 28 Avg. Depth 1742 feet Avg. Depth 1747 feet Avg Error 12.1 feet Avg Error 3.6 feet Min Error -55.7 feet Min Error -39.4 feet Max Error 64.4 feet Max Error 35.7 feet Stdev 27feet Stdev 19.5feet RSD 1.5% RSD 1.1% 95% Conf Interval 0.1% 1.3% 95% Conf Interval 0.2% 0.6% 20

Echo Sounder Results November 2009 Sea Trial Data 9/22/2010 21

Deep Blues New Probes 22

Deep Blues Before Aug 2008 23

Deep Blues: Nov 2009 Summary Deep Blue (Before Aug '08) Sample Size 19 Deep Blue (New) Sample Size 19 Avg. Depth 1740 feet Avg. Depth 1741 feet Avg Error -0.7 feet Avg Error 3.8 feet Min Error -60.5 feet Min Error -25.2 feet Max Error 45.5 feet Max Error 50.6 feet Stdev 28.3feet Stdev 18.3feet RSD 1.6% RSD 1.1% 95% Conf Interval 0.8% 0.7% 95% Conf Interval 0.3% 0.7% 24

Echo Sounder Results May 2010 Sea Trial Data 9/22/2010 25

Deep Blues New Probes 26

Deep Blues Before Aug 2008 27

Deep Blues: May 2010 Summary Deep Blue (Before Aug '08) Sample Size 38 Deep Blue (New) Sample Size 40 Avg. Depth 1735 feet Avg. Depth 1727 feet Avg Error -7.6 feet Avg Error -10.3 feet Min Error -61.2 feet Min Error -51.1 feet Max Error 32.3 feet Max Error 57 feet Stdev 17feet Stdev 21.8feet RSD 1.0% RSD 1.3% 95% Conf Interval 0.8% 0.1% 95% Conf Interval 1.0% 0.2% 28

Echo Sounder Results All Sea Trial Data 9/22/2010 29

Deep Blues New Probes 30

Deep Blues Before Aug 2008 31

Deep Blues: All Data Summary Deep Blue (Before Aug '08) Sample Size 85 Deep Blue (New) Sample Size 87 Avg. Depth 1739 feet Avg. Depth 1736 feet Avg Error 0.5 feet Avg Error -2.7 feet Min Error -61.2 feet Min Error -51.1 feet Max Error 64.4 feet Max Error 57 feet Stdev 24.6feet Stdev 21.3feet RSD 1.4% RSD 1.2% 95% Conf Interval 0.3% 0.3% 95% Conf Interval 0.4% 0.1% 32

Echo Sounder Results Summary 9/22/2010 33

Error Sources Impact point uncertainty Lateral current influence Natural trajectory variability Error minimized by flat bottom Impact time uncertainty Vertical current influence Launch detection Data sample rate Echo sounder errors False echoes Sound velocity Wave height 34

Deep Blue Results Summary Echo sounder fall rate evaluation Will continue as routine test Preliminary results from three sea trials New probes on average drop faster New probes generally drop more consistently Results include echo sounder error Depth data quite variable False echoes Obtain better depth measurements Continue refinement of the approach Procedural improvements Depth measurement improvements 35

Future Plans Remap the bottom Obtain more accurate depth data Reprocess May 09, November 09, May 10 data Repeat error analysis with new depth data Procedural improvements Improve echo sounder technique Identify flattest bottom Stationary drops Continue fall rate monitoring 36

37