Facility - For - New Prague, MN - By - AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN
Executive Summary Statement of Understanding The City of New Prague owns and ISD #721 through its Community Education Department programs/operates the existing municipal outdoor pool facility that is aging, the facility has a number of operational concerns as well as a community / city concern for offering its pool users more facility amenities. The existing outdoor facility only generates around half of the revenue required to stay operational. The pools also have code and ADA compliance issues. USAquatics first conducted an assessment of the existing municipal pool in 2009. Almost five years have passed since the original assessment, and an updated study of this facility is clearly warranted to determine its condition to date, and provide some options for renovation or expansion to serve the changing aquatic needs of the community. The goal of this study is to aid in the making of important decisions concerning the facility and its future, including options for expansion and adding amenities. Assessment Process Tom Schaffer and Ryan Johnson from USAquatics have completed an onsite evaluation of the existing aquatic facility along with assistance from Maintenance Supervisor Glen Sticha, Operator Scott Warner and Planning Director Ken Ondich. The purpose of the assessment was to determine the facilities condition and usability to include record data from past seasons. In addition, a Community Survey has been created and results will be reviewed and included as part of this Study. Scope of Study The scope of this study covers the following areas of the facility: Swimming pool structure, recirculation, filtration, and sanitation equipment Pool deck area, diving boards, features, etc. Compliance with new Federal and State Main Drain Laws Compliance with new Americans with Disabilities Act Laws Attendance, revenues and expenses Provide options for renovation/new facility Provide possible location sites for a new facility Study Criteria The criteria used in our assessment include: Previous assessment completed by USAquatics Facility condition and other observable conditions Facility code requirements and compliance An understanding of cause and effect associated with various aquatic designs and operating procedures as presented to us through the assessment, review, and design of several thousand aquatic facilities Study area demographics used in determining community aquatic needs Study results of a Community Aquatics Survey Intent of Report The intent is to present a summary of needed improvements and added amenities including factors affecting patron usage, revenue potentials, and expenses associated with the operation and management of the aquatic facility. The goal is to provide stake holders with the necessary information to make informed decisions regarding the future of Aquatics in New Prague. Page 2
Summary Based on discussions with staff, a physical assessment of the existing outdoor facility, analysis of the existing condition and evaluation of the community survey at the New Prague Municipal Pool Facility, USAquatics has determined that the facility warrants a large number of improvements and expansion to better serve the needs of the community. Several amenity options for the expansion of the outdoor pool facility have been provided for consideration. These amenity options provide a range from repairing the existing outdoor facility, renovation and expansion to an entirely new facility. The main pool offers a very small variety of aquatic amenities including 1-meter diving, lap lanes, walk out stairs and varying water depths to meet some of the community s aquatic needs. This pool would be costly to expand as any aquatic program expansion to the pool would require larger filtration, recirculation and water treatment systems, as well as, major changes to the pool structure. The wading pool is undersized to adequately serve the younger patrons of New Prague, as well as the growing demand for an accessible zero depth beach type entry body of water. This pool would also be costly to expand due to filtration and recirculation requirements. It would be far more cost effective to demolish the existing wading pool and construct a new zero depth entry pool complete with a wide variety of amenities geared toward younger children. Neither pool meets requirements for ADA accessibility. Due to the size of the main pool, two means of ADA ingress/egress are required of which the primary entrance needs to be a ramp or zero-depth entry. It should be noted, the main pool having two means of ingress/egress for ADA was not a requirement at the time of the previous assessment. A fixed ADA lift was ordered in May of 2014. There is a sizeable added expense to make both pools ADA accessible. The main cost difference from the original assessment and budget estimate to the current preliminary cost estimate is simply inflation in construction costs since 2009 and current trends we have seen on outdoor aquatic projects. Additionally, the earlier assessment was done on the pool and did not include bathhouse work or associated costs. This study includes options and estimated pricing for expanding the current facility and adding amenities such as play features, a climbing wall and waterslide which were not part of the 2009 assessment. Regenerative media is shown as the replacement for the current sand filters as opposed to the prior assessment replacing sand with sand. The facility as a whole does not provide an appropriate aquatic venue for a community the size of New Prague. The facility is too small in relation to the New Prague area demographics. Any proposed aquatic facility solution should take into account the City demographics that show a high percentage of youth and young families. We recommend the expansion of program elements to serve the New Prague aquatic community. The aquatic expansion should also provide a secondary service area of approximately a 15-30 mile radius. Given the growth and size of New Prague, the current pool site may not be the best location to service the community as a whole and alternative locations should be considered. The following is a list of possible options for the future of the existing outdoor pool facility: o Option 1: Close the existing outdoor pool. This would mean swimming lessons would no longer be offered in New Prague. The bathhouse, pools and decks would be demolished and removed. Utilities would be capped. The voids would be filled in and sod/seed placed over to create a lawn area. The current City subsidy would no longer be required. Patrons of the existing pool would travel elsewhere for lessons, recreation, etc. Estimated cost range: $47,400 - $55,200 o Option 1A: Close the existing outdoor pool. Same as above; however, the bathhouse and utilities would remain. The bathhouse could be utilized for other purposes (ex: baseball, etc.) Estimated cost range: $36,600 - $42,600 Page 3
o Option 2: Repair Existing. Make only the recommended repairs to the existing pools and facility to address operational issues, concerns and code issues including accessibility. This Option would not expand the facility or add any aquatic play elements. The wading pool would be modified to 600 s.f. splash pool and would include a zero-depth entry for accessibility. The coping brick around both pools would be removed and a new poured concrete edge installed. Both pools would receive a new epoxy paint finish. New pumps/filters would be installed along with associated piping. Decks would be selectively demolished and replaced as needed. This Option would create little if any increase of operational costs and revenues. The City subsidy would still be required to assist with operational expenses. Attendance would remain at current levels while decreasing slowly. Estimated cost range: $471,480 - $516,780 o Option 3: Renovate and Expand Existing. Make necessary repairs to the existing main pool and demo and remove the existing wading pool. Install a larger 1,200 s.f. zero-depth entry splash pool more appropriate sized to meet the needs of the community. This Option would include the addition of a climbing wall to the main pool and making necessary adjustments to the pool to allow for a waterslide to be installed in the shallow-end of the main pool. Shade structures would be added around the deck area. The coping brick around the main pool would be removed and a new stainless steel gutter with grating installed. Both pools would have a new quartz aggregate plaster with ceramic tile accents installed. New pumps/filters would be installed along with associated piping necessary for the new gutter recirculation system. All decks would be replaced. This Option would make for increased operational costs due to replacing the wading pool with a larger splash pool, as well as the addition of a waterslide. Adding aquatic features and amenities may increase attendance and revenue; however, the City subsidy would continue to be needed for operation. Attendance would increase with this Option; however, numbers would drop off after the first few years. Estimated cost range: $1,434,220 - $1,593,960 o Option 4: Spray Pad/Wet Deck. The existing pools would be demolished and back-filled in. A new 800-1,000 s.f. Spray Pad/Wet Deck would be constructed on the current site. The Spray Pad/Wet Deck would be complete with pump/filter and recirculation system including piping. Several spray features and interactive play features would be included. With this option, overall attendance would decrease as this Option only targets the younger age groups. Operational expenses would decrease due to less staffing being required, less water to treat with chemicals, etc. With this option there would be little to no revenue generated as typically facilities of this type charge no admission. The operational subsidy would decrease. Estimated cost range: $491,400-$558,600 o Option 5: New Aquatic Facility. This Option would allow for the existing facility to remain open for use during construction of a new facility. The new facility would be appropriately sized to meet the needs of the community while providing a wider range of aquatic amenities that better reflects the demographics of New Prague. A new facility would also be designed to accommodate for future growth and could potentially be located on the Armory site. No preliminary design work has been completed; however, a City the size of New Prague could support a facility with an estimated total project cost of around $4-$5 million. Estimated cost range: TBD Page 4
Table of Contents SECTION ONE: ASSESSMENT... 6 Main Pool... 6 Recirculation System... 6 Pool Equipment - General... 6 Pump... 7 Heater... 7 Pool Filter... 7 Flow Rate... 7 Chemical Control... 7 Wading Pool... 8 Wading Pool Recirculation System... 8 Wading Pool Heater... 8 Wading Pool Pump... 8 Wading Pool Filter... 8 Wading Pool Chemical Control... 8 Bathhouse... 9 Concessions... 9 Deck Area... 9 SECTION TWO: OPTIONS... 10 Option 1 (Close outdoor pool)... 10 Option 1A (Close outdoor pool Bathhouse remains)... 10 Option 2 (Repair Existing)... 10 Option 3 (Renovate and Expand)... 12 Option 4 (Wet Deck/Spray Pad)... 14 SECTION THREE: EXISTING FACILITY... 16 Facility Layout... 16 2014 Admission Rates... 17 2013 School Expenditures... 17 2013 City Expenditures... 17 Revenue vs. Expense (2013-2007)... 17 Revenue vs. Expenses... 18 Census Information... 19 2010 Attendance Information... 20 Existing Facility Photographs... 21 SECTION FOUR: PRELIMINARY DESIGN... 25 Option 3 Renovate & Expand Existing Facility... 25 Option 4 Spray Pad/Wet Deck... 26 Option 5 New Family Aquatic Center... 27 SECTION FIVE: NEW AQUATIC FACILITY ANALYSIS... 28 APPENDIX A: EXISTING POOL DATA... 29 APPENDIX B: 2010 COMMUNITY EDUCATION PLANNING SURVEY RESULTS... 30 APPENDIX C: 2014 COMMUNITY SURVEY... 30 Page 5
SECTION ONE: ASSESSMENT Main Pool The main pool was built in 1983 and opened the following summer in 1984. The main pool consists of a 6- lane lap pool with attached deep water diving well, as well as multi-use area. Pool depths vary from 3-6 at the shallow end to 12-0 at the diving well. The diving well has two 1-meter diving boards. The 1-meter diving boards are in fair condition Since the pool perimeter is in excess of 300 feet, two means of ADA compliant access are required. Currently the Main Pool does not provide any means of ADA access. We recommend the addition of a fixed ADA lift to account for one means of access. In order to be compliant with ADA access requirements the primary means of access into the pool must be a ramp or beach type zero depth entry, which would account for the second means of access. It should be noted a fixed ADA lift was ordered in May and will be installed upon arrival. The Main Pool has very limited amenities for recreational aquatic activity, educational aquatic needs and aquatic fitness. The pool vessel is in poor shape and a large crack, which appears to be located at the construction cold joint, spans across the lap area. The main pool has been patched numerous times over the years and continues to require additional work. There are several areas of spalling where the paint finish is flaking off leaving bare concrete exposed. In addition, the ceramic tile in the pool and waterline tile is coming off in several locations and all areas of ceramic tile are in need of grout replacement. Due to the existing conditions of the main pool epoxy paint finish, we recommend sand blasting the shell to sound concrete, and the troweling of quartz aggregate plaster with ceramic tile accents. This would also be a longer lasting pool finish. The coping brick surrounding the entire Main Pool is in extremely poor condition. The bricks have become brittle with age and are cracking and breaking off in pieces or completely. This is a safety issue for patrons as the broken coping bricks are left with several sharp edges which can easily cut feet or hands. Overall, the main pool lacks the aquatic needs of the New Prague aquatic community. Recirculation System The Main Pool has surface skimmers rather than a gutter system, which would be ideal for a pool of this size. Based on Aquatic industry standards, pools wider than 30 or over 2,000 square feet should have a gutter system that allows for skimming around the entire perimeter. Several of the existing skimmers are either missing weirs or have broken weirs. In addition, the federal Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act (VGB) requires certified grate covers over the skimmer equalizer lines. At the time of the assessment none of the equalizer lines had covers; however, covers have since been installed. The Main Pool is in compliance with the State of Minnesota Abigail Taylor Pool Safety Act (ATA), which protects patrons from entrapment in pool suction openings. VGB requires all pool grates to be tested and stamped compliant with ANSI A112.19.8-2007. The current grate covers were stamped in 2008 and should be replaced prior to the 2015 swimming season. Staff reported 2-3 broken pipe locations over the past few years that led to concrete decks settling. Those pipes were repaired; however, there is still suspicion that there are leaks within the recirculation piping. Pool Equipment - General The pool equipment is largely original to the facility with a few exceptions. The equipment met the needs of the community; however, for the most part it is outdated and inefficient in terms of operation. A number of the valves are cast iron, rusting, and not holding their seal. Valves should be replaced with non-metallic valves designed for pool use. Page 6
Pump The main pool pump is a horizontal pump located above water level which can make priming and servicing difficult. The existing pump is in poor condition and is very inefficient. A vertically mounted high efficiency pump with a premium motor installed below water level would solve priming difficulties and provide higher efficiency during operation. The current size and layout of the mechanical room does not allow for a recessed pump pit. In addition to a new pump located in a pump pit, we recommend adding a variable frequency drive to the motor. This provides significant energy cost savings and efficiency while extending the life of the pump and reducing maintenance. The pump strainer is original to the facility and is poor condition. It is cast iron and is badly rusted. Strainers of this age and condition become very difficult to open and close properly and have limited capacity. We recommend replacing the strainer at the same time the pump is replaced. It should be replaced with a nonmetallic strainer with a clear lid and large strainer basket. Heater The main pool has is serviced by a large Raypak natural gas fired heater. This heater was installed in 2013. Staff reported no issues or concerns with this equipment. Pool Filter The existing sand filter is original to the 1984 construction of this facility. As noted in the prior assessment, due to its age and condition, this filter poses a number of concerns and operational issues. The filter is constructed of mild steel and is completely covered in rust. Often times the interior of these tanks are in even worse condition and the integrity of the tank is of concern. The pressure gauges noted in the earlier report as not functioning properly have been replaced. According to the operator, the pool is backwashed on Monday, Wednesday and Friday during the regular swimming season. Backwashing should only take place when required based on pressure differential. As long as flow rates are met, backwashing the filter should be kept to a minimum to save on water, chemicals and heat. In addition, the filter sand has not been looked at in at least the past 17 years. Typical filter sand media should be replaced every 3-5 years. The pool filter also lacks the air gap to waste that is required. The valves on the face piping do not work properly due to age and corrosion. We recommend the installation of new regenerative media filters that are more efficient, take up a fraction of the current footprint, and are green friendly using 1/50 th of the water used by traditional sand filters. In addition, replacing the existing sand filters with regenerative media filters would allow for more open space in the mechanical room to service other equipment. Although we recommend regenerative media filters, we will provide filter replacement options for both regenerative media filters and traditional sand filters. At a minimum, if the filter is not replaced - the manholes should be removed and the filter sand should be inspected. The sand media should be loose with no clumping or hard top coating. Flow Rate The required flow rate for the Main Pool based on the maximum allowed 6-hour turnover is 584 gpm. Due to the facility being closed at the time of the inspection, we were unable to verify the current flow rate. The prior assessment noted the flow rate at 450 gpm; however, the accuracy of the flow meter was in question. It is possible the original design flow rate was greater than a 6-hour turnover. Additionally, the 6-inch suction pipe is limited to 529 gpm by code. The suction pipe should be sized at 8 to allow for full flow suction. Chemical Control The chemical control system is a Strantrol System 3. This controller is outdated technology and inadequate to meet the needs of the facility. We recommend a new, user-friendly, web-based chemical controller that can Page 7
reduce operational and maintenance issues. This new technology also allows operators the ability to access and control settings remotely. Wading Pool The Wading Pool is square in shape and located adjacent to the main pool. The wading pool depth varies from 1-0 to 1-6. There is a 3ft. chain link fence as a barrier separating the wading pool from the rest of the facility. As was the case with the Main Pool, the coping brick is in poor condition, with several cracks and broken pieces. The Wading Pool lacks any interactive features or water play elements and is not sized appropriately to service the younger demographics of the New Prague community. The wading pool also lacks any form of ADA access. The Minnesota State Department of Health now requires all wading pools to have a zero-depth entry. Due to the size, depth and condition of the Wading Pool we have determined that renovating it is not a viable option. We recommend demolishing the wading pool to allow for a larger splash pool with a zero depth entry. At a minimum, we recommend replacing the coping brick as needed or utilizing a form to pour a new coping as a short term solution. Wading Pool Recirculation System The Wading Pool has one surface skimmers located on a side wall. The Wading Pool has four inlets and a single main drain. The Wading Pool main drain is compliant for State and federal law; however, due to standing water in the pool at the time of inspection we were unable to verify the date on the grating. It is assumed the grate cover was purchased at the same time as the Main Pool cover meaning it is due for replacement. Wading Pool Heater There is no heater on the wading pool. Heated shallow water is the #1 or most commonly asked for amenity for aquatic facilities. We recommend the addition of a heater that is adequately sized to handle loads required for a new splash pool. Wading Pool Pump The Wading Pool is serviced by one pump, a 1.5HP high-rpm pump that is located above water level. This pump is aging and very inefficient. This pump handles recirculation with suction from the main drain and skimmer. As with the Main Pool pump, a vertically mounted high efficiency pump with a premium motor installed below water level would solve priming difficulties and provide higher efficiency during operation. Based on our recommendation to completely replace the existing wading pool, a new zero depth splash pool would require a new pump to handle the increased volume. At that time we recommend installation of vertical mount high efficiency pump in a recessed pump pit below water level, with a premium motor and variable frequency drive. Wading Pool Filter The sand filter dedicated to the Wading Pool is a Triton TR-100, which is a smaller residential style filter that has likely exceeded its life expectancy. Since the previous assessment, the multi-port valve has been replaced and staff reported no issues with the filter. It was unknown when the sand was last replaced. As noted earlier, sand media has an average life expectancy of 3-5 years and should be replaced. Wading Pool Chemical Control The chemical control system is a Strantrol System 3, the same as is used on the Main Pool. Again, this controller is outdated technology and inadequate to meet the needs of the facility. We recommend a new, Page 8
user-friendly, web-based chemical controller that can reduce operational and maintenance issues. This new technology also allows operators the ability to access and control settings remotely. Bathhouse The bathhouse is in fair condition for its age. The bathhouse had been modified recently to include a chemical storage addition on the south end of the building. The change rooms and shower facilities are also in fair condition; however, ADA accessibility is an issue and the building lacks appropriate ADA toilets and shower amenities. In addition, multiple showers are not allowed to have a single drain point. The current layout has the appropriate number of fixtures based on patron bather load: two urinals, two toilets and three sinks in the Men s locker room and the Women s has four toilets and three sinks. The women s change room has two private change booths that have partitions. The hot water heater for the showers is undersized to keep up with the demand required. Current trends show a need for family change rooms that allows for a parent or guardian to keep young children of either sex with them, rather than sending them into a locker room alone or bringing them into a locker room of the opposite sex. To remedy this, we recommend the addition of two family style change rooms. Other current trends for bathhouses include a central entrance from curbside to pool side with change rooms on one side of the entry and admissions, staff and concessions on the other side of the entry. This results in better control of users with minimal staffing. Concessions The current bathhouse configuration has the main entry area doubling as a concession area which is not very effective and lack of space is an issue. The current layout and amenities allows for a very limited number of products to be sold. A permanent dedicated concession area complete with a three compartment sink would be more efficient and allow for increased serving options such as pre-packaged food, etc. This is also an option that would allow for the facility to increase its revenue. Deck Area The majority of the deck area surrounding the Main Pool and Wading Pool is in good condition. There are a few areas around the diving well where shifting and settling has created a number of raised areas or toe stubbers. Sinking of slabs and extensive cracking has been caused by pipes leaking under deck along the south side of the Main Pool. The sunken deck areas should be replaced after compacting fill underneath. Several depth markers located around the Main Pool are missing the notation for inches. Code requires that water depths be plainly marked in feet AND inches. The Wading Pool lacks any depth marking notation. If the Wading Pool is not replaced, depth marking should be added. The surrounding fence has a few spaces where gaps between posts and between mesh and concrete deck exceeds the maximum allowed. Vinyl coated fence is preferred for aquatic facilities as it is more aesthetically pleasing and has a longer life expectancy. The gate into the Wading Pool area must be self-closing, latching and capable of being locked. The fence mesh should be adjusted as needed, as well as spacing between posts. A self-closing mechanism should be installed on the Wading Pool gate. The facility offers a small amount of shade and minimal table seating that allows patrons to stay longer which would result in additional revenue. We recommend the addition of several shade structures around the pools. Lighting for recreational swimming is required to be 10-foot candles and 30-foot candles for training and competition. Light readings were not taken as the inspection occurred during the day. We recommend reviewing lighting levels when lights are on, at least 1-hour after sunset. The deck along the east side of the Main Pool has starting block anchors; however, State Health Code requires a minimum pool depth of at least 5ft. Currently, starting blocks are not installed and should not be unless new anchors are installed where depth requirements are met. Page 9
SECTION TWO: OPTIONS Option 1 (Close outdoor pool) Demolition Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following demolition work to prepare for closing the facility: Demo and remove Main Pool, Wading Pool, and surrounding decks/fence Probable cost estimate: $20,000 - $22,000 Demolition of non-reusable Mechanical/Equipment Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000 In-fill existing pools Probable cost estimate: $3,000 - $4,000 Demo Bathhouse & Cap existing utilities Probable cost estimate: $9,000 - $10,500 Seed/sod lawn area Probable cost estimate: $3,500 - $4,500 Subtotal: $39,500 - $46,000 Soft Costs (20%) $ 7,900 - $ 9,200 Estimated Demolition Cost Range: $47,400 - $55,200 Option 1A (Close outdoor pool Bathhouse remains) Demolition Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following demolition work to prepare for closing the facility: Demo and remove Main Pool, Wading Pool, and surrounding decks/fence Probable cost estimate: $20,000 - $22,000 Demolition of non-reusable Mechanical/Equipment Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000 In-fill existing pools Probable cost estimate: $3,000 - $4,000 Seed/sod lawn area Probable cost estimate: $3,500 - $4,500 Subtotal: $30,500 - $35,500 Soft Costs (20%) $ 6,100 - $ 7,100 Estimated Demolition Cost Range: $36,600 - $42,600 Option 2 (Repair Existing) Main Pool Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the main pool area: Install new main drain covers prior to 2015 swim season Probable cost estimate: $1,000 - $1,500 Replace missing/damaged skimmer weirs Probable cost estimate: $700 - $800 Demolition of decks and installation of ADA access ramp along west side of pool Probable cost estimate: $70,000 - $80,000 Page 10
Page 11 Replacement of damaged brick/coping, form pour new edge (353 ) Probable cost estimate: $15,000 - $18,000 Re-paint pool floor Probable cost estimate: $14,000 - $15,000 Cold joint repair around entire pool perimeter Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000 Replace missing ceramic tile Probable cost estimate: $1,800 - $2,200 Re-grout all pool tile Probable cost estimate: $5,500 - $6,000 Subtotal: $112,000 - $126,900 Soft Costs (20%) $ 22,400 - $ 25,380 Estimated Main Pool Repair Cost Range: $134,400 - $152,280 Wading Pool Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the wading pool area: For this option we recommend select demolition of the existing wading pool to allow for a zero-depth entry splash pool, poured concrete coping with no additional above ground features: Select demo of wading pool and removal of decks needed for zero-depth entry area Probable cost estimate: $3,500 - $4,000 Modify wading pool to into 600 s.f. zero-depth entry splash pool with imbedded ground sprays Probable cost estimate: $100,000 - $115,000 Replacement of damaged brick/coping, form pour new edge Probable cost estimate: $3,800 - $4,200 Install new splash pool heater Probable cost estimate: $5,500 - $6,500 Re-paint pool floor Probable cost estimate: $1,000 - $1,500 Install new main drain cover prior to 2015 swim season Probable cost estimate: $500 - $750 Subtotal: $ 114,300 - $131,950 Soft Costs (20%) $ 22,860 - $ 26,390 Estimated Wading Pool Repair Cost Range: $137,160 $158,340 Mechanical/Equipment Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the pool equipment: New pump strainer Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000 Replace pool pump with vertical mount high efficiency pump and premium motors and vfd Probable cost estimate: $13,000 - $14,000 Replace existing sand filters with regenerative media filters Probable cost estimate: $72,000 - $80,000 Construct pump pit Probable cost estimate: $15,000 - $18,000 Update equipment room piping and valves Probable cost estimate: $10,000 - $12,000 Backwash standpipe Probable cost estimate: $1,600 - $1,800
Subtotal: $116,600 - $131,800 Soft Costs (20%) $ 23,320 - $ 26,360 Estimated Mech. Repair Cost Range: $139,920 - $158,160 Bathhouse Based on our review and analysis, we recommend any work for repair of the Bathhouse. Modify bathhouse, shower & toilets for proper ADA access Probable cost estimate: $15,000 - $17,000 Adjust shower area/drains to meet code requirements Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000 Subtotal: $ 20,000 - $23,000 Soft Costs (20%) $ 4,000 $ 4,600 Estimated Bathhouse Repair Cost Range: $24,000 - $27,600 Site Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the site area: Select demo and removal of sunken/extensively cracked deck, compact fill and pour new Probable cost estimate: $11,000 - $12,500 Adjust fencing as needed, add-on to fencing around zero depth area & install self-closing gate Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $4,500 Subtotal: $ 15,000 - $17,000 Soft Costs (20%) $ 3,000 $ 3,400 Estimated Site Repair Cost Range: $18,000 - $20,400 Option 2 Total Estimated Cost Range: $471,480 - $516,780 Option 3 (Renovate and Expand) Main Pool Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for renovation and expansion of the main pool area to include added amenities and features: Install an aquatic climbing wall on side of the diving well. Installation of gutter cup anchors and rope & float to be included Probable cost estimate: $36,000 - $38,000 Install new main drain covers prior to 2015 swim season Probable cost estimate: $1,000 - $1,500 Replace missing/damaged skimmer weirs Probable cost estimate: $700 - $800 Demolition of decks and installation of ADA access ramp along west side of pool Probable cost estimate: $70,000 - $80,000 Demo & remove coping, installation of new stainless steel perimeter gutter and surgetank Probable cost estimate: $190,000 - $210,000 Prep surface & install new quartz aggregate plaster finish with ceramic tile accents Probable cost estimate: $85,000 - $95,000 Cold joint repair around entire pool perimeter Page 12
Replace missing ceramic tile Re-grout all pool tile Demo pool as needed for waterslide run-out Install waterslide, tower and related piping, etc. Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000 Probable cost estimate: $1,800 - $2,200 Probable cost estimate: $5,500 - $6,000 Probable cost estimate: $6,000 - $6,500 Probable cost estimate: $185,500 - $200,000 Subtotal: $585,500 - $645,000 Soft Costs (20%) $117,100 - $129,000 Estimated Main Pool Expansion Cost Range: $702,600 - $774,000 Wading Pool Based on our review and analysis, we have determined it is not feasible or cost effective to attempt to repair or renovate the existing wading pool. For this option we recommend the demolition of the existing wading pool, and installation of a new larger splash pool with embedded sprays and several additional above ground features: Demo and remove existing wading pool Probable cost estimate: $4,500 - $5,500 Construct new 1,200 s.f. zero-depth entry splash pool complete with interactive play features & quartz aggregate plaster finish Probable cost estimate: $265,000 - $290,000 Installation of new 3 fencing to replace existing Probable cost estimate: $1,500 - $2,000 Install new splash pool heater Probable cost estimate: $5,500 - $6,500 Subtotal: $276,500 - $304,000 Soft Costs (20%) $ 54,200 - $ 60,800 Estimated Wading Pool Renovation Cost Range: $330,700 - $364,800 Mechanical/Equipment Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the pool equipment: New pump strainer Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000 Replace pool pump with vertical mount high efficiency pump and premium motors and vfd Probable cost estimate: $13,000 - $14,000 Replace existing sand filters with regenerative media filters Probable cost estimate: $92,000 - $110,000 Construct pump pit Probable cost estimate: $18,000 - $20,000 Update equipment room piping and valves Probable cost estimate: $10,000 - $12,000 Backwash standpipe Probable cost estimate: $1,600 - $1,800 New slide vertical mount high efficiency pump and premium motor Probable cost estimate: $20,000 - $23,500 Page 13
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN Subtotal: $159,600 - $187,300 Soft Costs (20%) $ 31,920 - $ 37,460 Estimated Mech. Repair Cost Range: $191,520 - $224,760 Bathhouse Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for renovation and expansion of the bathhouse area: Reloconfigure bathhouse to create a dedicated concession area facing the pool deck to include required amenities needed for pre-packaged food service/sales. Probable cost estimate: $27,500 - $30,000 Add two family change rooms complete with bathroom/showers on to existing bathhouse. Probable cost estimate: $76,000 - $80,000 Modify bathhouse, shower & toilets for proper ADA access Probable cost estimate: $15,000 - $17,000 Adjust shower area/drains to meet code requirements Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000 Subtotal: $123,500 - $133,000 Soft Costs (20%) $ 24,700 - $ 26,600 Estimated Bathhouse Renovation Cost Range: $148,200 - $159,600 Site Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for the renovation and expansion of the site area: Demo and remove all decking, install new decking properly sloped to new deck drains. Probable cost estimate: $25,000 - $30,000 Addition of six shade umbrellas around site Probable cost estimate: $21,000 - $23,000 Adjust fencing as needed, install new fencing around waterslide tower, zero depth area & install selfclosing gate Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000 Subtotal: $ 51,000 - $59,000 Soft Costs (20%) $ 10,200 - $11,800 Estimated Site Renovation Cost Range: $61,200 - $70,800 Option 3 Total Estimated Cost Range: $1,434,220 - $1,593,960 Option 4 (Wet Deck/Spray Pad) Pool Demolition Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following demolition work to allow for the site to be prepared for a new Spray Pad/Wet Deck: Demo and remove Main Pool, Wading Pool and surrounding decks/fence Probable cost estimate: $24,000 - $26,000 Demolition of non-reusable Mechanical/Equipment Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000 In-fill existing pools Page 14
Seed/sod lawn area Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000 Probable cost estimate: $3,500 - $4,500 Subtotal: $35,500 - $40,500 Soft Costs (20%) $ 7,100 - $ 8,100 Estimated Demolition Cost Range: $42,600 - $48,600 Spray Pad/Wet Deck Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following demolition work to allow for the site to be prepared for a new Spray Pad/Wet Deck: 800-1,000 s.f. Spray Pad/Wet Deck with recirculation system, imbedded features and surrounding concrete decking Probable cost estimate: $245,000 - $270,000 Above ground play features Probable cost estimate: $125,000 - $150,000 New 4 fencing around Spray Pad/Wet Deck Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000 Subtotal: $374,000 - $425,000 Soft Costs (20%) $ 74,800 - $ 85,000 Estimated Spray Pad/Wet Deck Cost Range: $448,800 - $510,000 Option 4 Total Estimated Cost Range: $491,400 - $558,600 Page 15
SECTION THREE: EXISTING FACILITY Facility Layout Page 16
2014 Admission Rates Daily Pass $4.25 (includes tax) Punch Card (10 sessions) $35 + tax Punch Card (over age 65) $20 + tax Season Pass o 1 adult $90 + tax o 1 couple or 1 child & parents $115 + tax o 2 children & parents $140 + tax o 3 children & parents $190 + tax o 4 or more children & parents $240 + tax 2013 School Expenditures Category Budget Salaries $56,173 Professional Services $2,320 Communications/Phone $182 Postage/Printing $740 Utilities $8,181 Liability Insurance $2,649 Travel/Mileage $400 General Supplies $9,377 Concessions Purchase $4,403 Credit Card $1,173 Red Cross fee $1,027 Total $86,625 2013 City Expenditures Category Budget Repairs & Maintenance Supplies $3,777 Professional Services $10 Insurances $4,016 Repairs/Maintenance $170 Training/Seminars - License, Fees & Registration $650 Donation Civic Org. $6,500 *Capital Outlay $53,749 Pool Fill (water costs) $972 Salaries (staff time) $31,295 - Total $101,139 2013 Expense total (School & City): $187,764 *Capital Outlay costs covered the added chemical room and pool heater Revenue vs. Expense (2013-2007) 2013 Category Budget Revenue $85,247 Expense $187,764 Profit (Subsidy) ($102,517) 2012 Category Budget Revenue $86,681 Expense $144,847 Profit (Subsidy) ($58,166) 2011 Category Budget Revenue $78,649 Expense $123,703 Profit (Subsidy) ($45,054) 2010* Category Budget Revenue $76,495 Expense $120,768 Profit (Subsidy) ($44,273) Page 17
2009* Category Budget Revenue $71,833 Expense $117,437 Profit (Subsidy) ($45,604) 2008* Category Budget Revenue $69,667 Expense $121,488 Profit (Subsidy) ($51,821) 2007* Category Budget Revenue $63,908 Expense $115,576 Profit (Subsidy) ($51,668) *Indicates year(s) with estimated City operational expenses. Revenue vs. Expenses Page 18
Census Information Total Population: 7,378 (2012 estimate) Households: 2,727 Families residing within the city: 1,910 Families with children under 18 = 42.5% Population distribution by age: o 17 & under 31.5% o 18-24 6.6% o 25-44 29.1% o 45-64 20.4% o 65+ 12.4% When analyzing the estimated 2010 New Prague Census information the following information was determined: o o o The highest percentage of the population is those 17 and under at 31.5%. The second highest age range is 25-44 at 29.1%, followed by the age range of 45-64 that accounted for 20.4% of the population. This suggests an aquatic facility and added amenities that focuses on young families. The aquatic need is for a facility that offers a wider range of aquatic activities Page 19
2010 Attendance Information Total afternoon and evening swim users 7,837 Average afternoon open swim users 101 Average evening swim session 29 Pool passes sold 120 10-session punch-cards 102 Swim lesson totals 693 o Afternoon admissions were split as 46% daily fee, 44% daily pass, 10% punch-card o Evening admissions were split as 60% season pass, 32% daily fee, 8% punch-card o Open swim was daily from 1-5pm and between 6pm 8:30 pm on various evenings and weekends o Average attendance for afternoon open swim was 100.66 patrons o Average attendance for evening open swim was 28.68 patrons *Note: attendance data was only collected during the 2010 swim season Page 20
Existing Facility Photographs Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
SECTION FOUR: PRELIMINARY DESIGN Option 3 Renovate & Expand Existing Facility Page 25
Option 4 Spray Pad/Wet Deck (Sample shown on Existing Site) Page 26 of 30
Option 5 New Family Aquatic Center (Sample shown on Armory Site) Page 27 of 30
SECTION FIVE: NEW AQUATIC FACILITY ANALYSIS The following are approximate construction costs for similar facilities. These numbers should be used for planning purposes only as a guide in determining the relative cost of a new facility versus renovation of an existing facility. City: Population: Approx. Budget: Year Built: Glencoe 5,628 $2,500,000 2000 Stewartville 5,926 $2,800,000 2006 Waseca 9,410 $3,600,000 2006 Redwood falls 5,253 $3,600,000 2008 Sleepy eye 3,598 $3,000,000 2009 Gaylord 2,307 $3,400,000 2009 La Crescent 4,860 $3,200,000 2010 Kasson 5,978 $3,200,000 2012 Cannon Falls 4,083 $3,990,000 - Byron 4,965 $5,100,000 - Pine Island 3,272 $2,600,000 - Hutchinson 14,178 $5,500,000 - Farmington 21,086 $7,077,000 - New Prague 7,378 TBD - *Primary Service area of 15 miles Page 28 of 30
APPENDIX A: EXISTING POOL DATA SWIMMING POOL WADING POOL SIZE: 44 ft. x 75 ft. 1 in. 20 ft. x 20 ft. 42 ft. x 38 ft. 4 in. 15 ft. x 24 ft. SURFACE AREA: SHALLOW WATER (< 5 FT) 3,469 sq. ft. 400 sq.ft. DEEP WATER (> 5 FT) 1,609 sq. ft. --- TOTAL: 5,078 sq. ft. 400 sq.ft. SURGE CAPACITY: REQUIRED (in gal.) 5,078 gallons 400 sq.ft. SUPPLIED (in gal.) 5,078 gallons (in pool) 400 sq. ft. (in pool) POOL CAPACITY: 210,000 gallons ~2,500 gallons RATE OF FLOW: FLOW RATE REQUIRED 548 gpm (6 hr turnover) 37.5 gpm (30gpm skimmer + 20% m.d.) ACTUAL RATE OF FLOW ~ 450 gpm ~70 gpm TURNOVER: ~7.8 hours ~36 min. (6 hour max requ.) (2 hours max. requ.) FILTER SIZE: 300 sq. ft. 25 sq. ft. FILTER FLOW RATE: 7.33 gpm / s.f. 14.4 gpm / s.f. BATHER LOAD: SHALLOW WATER 231 26 DEEP WATER 60 --- TOTAL 291 persons 26 persons Page 29 of 30
APPENDIX B: 2010 COMMUNITY EDUCATION PLANNING SURVEY RESULTS APPENDIX C: 2014 COMMUNITY SURVEY Page 30 of 30