Appendix D: SWAN Wave Modelling

Similar documents
Appendix M: Durras Lake Tailwater Conditions

1. Introduction. 1.1 Background

DUXBURY WAVE MODELING STUDY

Coastal Wave Energy Dissipation: Observations and Modeling

Evaluation of June 9, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study for Town of Weymouth, Norfolk, Co, MA

Technical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis Island Harbour Club, Gananoque, Ontario

Nearshore Dredged Material Placement Pilot Study at Noyo Harbor, CA

THE WAVE CLIMATE IN THE BELGIAN COASTAL ZONE

Wave Energy Atlas in Vietnam

Directional Wave Spectra from Video Images Data and SWAN Model. Keywords: Directional wave spectra; SWAN; video images; pixels

Technical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis 129 South Street, Gananoque

BILLY BISHOP TORONTO CITY AIRPORT PRELIMINARY RUNWAY DESIGN COASTAL ENGINEERING STUDY

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

Beach Wizard: Development of an Operational Nowcast, Short-Term Forecast System for Nearshore Hydrodynamics and Bathymetric Evolution

Coastal Wave Studies FY13 Summary Report

Wave Transformation Modeling with Bottom Friction Applied to the Southeast Oahu Reefs. Mary A. Cialone and Jane McKee Smith

Use of video imagery to test model predictions of surf heights

WAVE PERIOD FORECASTING AND HINDCASTING INVESTIGATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF

C3 VOLUME C: MIDDLE BANKS, MORETON BAY. Coastal Processes and Natural Features NEW PARALLEL RUNWAY DRAFT EIS/MDP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT C3-42

Ocean Wave Forecasting

An integrated three-dimensional model of wave-induced pore pressure and effective stresses in a porous seabed: II. Breaking waves

Wave energy converter effects on wave and sediment circulation

LATLAS. Documentation

The History of Coastal Flood Hazard Assessments in the Great Lakes

COFFS HARBOUR SEDIMENT MODELLING AND INVESTIGATION

Marine Renewables Industry Association. Marine Renewables Industry: Requirements for Oceanographic Measurements, Data Processing and Modelling

Aalborg Universitet. Estimation of wave conditions at Liseleje location Bogarino, Bruno; Brorsen, Michael. Publication date: 2007

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO MAPPING EXTREME WAVE INUNDATION: CONSEQUENCES OF SEA-LEVEL RISE AND COASTAL EROSION.

2 How do I use the Coastal Inundation Tool?

Prediction of Nearshore Waves and Currents: Model Sensitivity, Confidence and Assimilation

Development and Implementation of a Relocatable Coastal and Nearshore Modeling System

Model Predictions and Sensitivity Analysis of Nearshore Processes over Complex Bathymetry

Methodology and Results for Nearshore Wave Simulation in a Coupled Hydrodynamic and Wave Model System to Evaluate Storm Surge in Coastal Louisiana

FEMA Region V. Great Lakes Coastal Flood Study. Pilot Study Webinar. Berrien County, Michigan. February 26, 2014

CALCASIEU SALINITY STRUCTURES. HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING (To Support Design of Salinity Barriers)

COASTAL WAVE MODELLING VALIDATION USING NEW FIELD TECHNIQUES

An Investigation of the Influence of Waves on Sediment Processes in Skagit Bay

Taranaki Tsunami Inundation Analysis. Prepared for Taranaki Civil Defence Emergency Management Group. Final Version

Analysis of Extreme Wave Climates in Rhode Island Waters South of Block Island

Modeling Nearshore Waves for Hurricane Katrina

2016 NC Coastal Local Governments Annual Meeting

Preliminary Wake Wash Impact Analysis Redwood City Ferry Terminal, Redwood City, CA

Coastal Sediment Transport Modeling Ocean Beach & San Francisco Bight, CA

: Hydrodynamic input for 2D Vessel Simulations (HY- 0027)

Wave Propagation and Shoaling

CHAPTER 5 A SPECTRAL MODEL FOR WAVES IN THE NEAR SHORE ZONE. R.C. Ris', L.H. Holthuijsen' and N. Booif

Nearshore waveclimate

INTRODUCTION TO COASTAL ENGINEERING

Sea State Analysis. Topics. Module 7 Sea State Analysis 2/22/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering Orson P. Smith, PE, Ph.D.

Validation Test Report for the Simulating Waves Nearshore Model (SWAN): Cycle III, Version 40.11

To: William Woods, Jenni Austin Job No: CentrePort Harbour Deepening Project - Comments on community queries

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

ESTIMATION OF EXTREME WATER LEVELS AT NSW COASTAL ENTRANCES

2. Water levels and wave conditions. 2.1 Introduction

WAVE FORECASTING FOR OFFSHORE WIND FARMS

CMS Modeling of the North Coast of Puerto Rico

Appendix E Cat Island Borrow Area Analysis

IMPACTS OF COASTAL PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON THE COASTS OF CRETE: NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS

Coastal Inundation. An Overview for TCDC

Effect of Hydrodynamics on Sediment Transport near a Coastal Inlet

NUMERICAL STUDY OF WIND-GENERATED WAVES IN THE RED SEA

SWASH MODELLING OF A COASTAL PROTECTION SCHEME

Analysis of Extreme Wave Climates in Rhode Island Waters South of Block Island

Structure and discharge test cases

PUV Wave Directional Spectra How PUV Wave Analysis Works

G. Meadows, H. Purcell and L. Meadows University of Michigan

Metocean criteria for fatigue assessment. Rafael V. Schiller 5th COPEDI Seminar, Oct 8th 2014.

HIGH RESOLUTION WIND AND WAVE MEASUREMENTS FROM TerraSAR-X IN COMPARISON TO MARINE FORECAST

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 116 (2015 )

HYDRODYNAMICS AND MORPHODYNAMICS IN THE SURF ZONE OF A DISSIPATIVE BEACH

A Preliminary Review of Beach Profile and Hardbottom Interactions

Wave Forces on a Moored Vessel from Numerical Wave Model Results

SURF ZONE HYDRODYNAMICS COMPARISON OF MODELLING AND FIELD DATA

CHAPTER 68. RANDOM BREAKING WAVES HORIZONTAL SEABED 2 HANS PETER RIEDEl. & ANTHONY PAUL BYRNE

# Post Consultation and Submissions Resource Consent Conditions for Surfing Impact Mitigation August 2016

CVEN Computer Applications in Engineering and Construction. Programming Assignment #4 Analysis of Wave Data Using Root-Finding Methods

An Investigation of the Influence of Waves on Sediment Processes in Skagit Bay

MODELING OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON COASTAL STRUCTURES - CONTRIBUTION TO THEIR RE-DESIGN

Beach Profiles. Topics. Module 9b Beach Profiles and Crossshore Sediment Transport 3/23/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering

Inspection of Clarence City Beaches following Winter 2011 Storm Events

PARAMETRIZATION OF WAVE TRANSFORMATION ABOVE SUBMERGED BAR BASED ON PHYSICAL AND NUMERICAL TESTS

Evaluation of Unstructured WAVEWATCH III for Nearshore Application

REPORT. Skardon River Bauxite Project - Additional Coastal Assessment. Ports and Coastal Environmental Pty Ltd

Potential Impacts of Sand Mining Offshore of Maryland and Delaware: Part 1 Impacts on Physical Oceanographic Processes

Pathways Interns: Annika O Dea, Ian Conery, Andrea Albright

Unsteady Wave-Driven Circulation Cells Relevant to Rip Currents and Coastal Engineering

Wave Transformation, Prediction, and Analysis at Kaumalapau Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii

EFFECTS OF WAVE, TIDAL CURRENT AND OCEAN CURRENT COEXISTENCE ON THE WAVE AND CURRENT PREDICTIONS IN THE TSUGARU STRAIT

MECHANISM AND COUNTERMEASURES OF WAVE OVERTOPPING FOR LONG-PERIOD SWELL IN COMPLEX BATHYMETRY. Hiroaki Kashima 1 and Katsuya Hirayama 1

SWELL PREDICTION FOR THE EAST KOREAN COAST

APPENDIX A MODELING REPORT

Wave Prediction in the Santa Barbara Channel

April 7, Prepared for: The Caribbean Disaster Emergency Response Agency Prepared by: CEAC Solutions Co. Ltd.

Tidal Amplitude and Wave Setup in Trained and Untrained River Entrances.

SPECTRAL MODELING OF WAVE PROPAGATION IN COASTAL AREAS WITH A HARBOR NAVIGATION CHANNEL

Testing TELEMAC-2D suitability for tsunami propagation from source to near shore

Bob Battalio, PE Chief Engineer, ESA September 8, 2016

Application of Simulating WAves Nearshore (SWAN) model for wave simulation in Gulf of Thailand

Generalized Wave-Ray Approach for Propagation on a Sphere and Its Application to Swell Prediction

Transcription:

Appendix D: SWAN Wave Modelling D.1 Preamble The Eurobodalla Shire Council area is subject to extreme waves originating from offshore storms. When swell waves approach the coast, they are modified by the processes of refraction, diffraction, wave-wave interaction and dissipation processes. The model SWAN (Simulating WAves Nearshore) was used to quantify the change in wave conditions from an offshore boundary to nearshore locations of interest. Details of SWAN can be found in Booij et al. (1999) and Ris et al. (1999) and is described in brief below. D.2 SWAN Wave Model SWAN (version 41.10) is a third-generation wave model that computes random, short-crested, wind-generated waves in coastal regions and inland waters. The SWAN model is based on the wave action balance equation with sources and sinks, and accommodates the processes of wind generation, white capping, bottom friction, quadruplet wave-wave interactions, triad wave-wave interactions and depth induced breaking (Ris et al., 1995). It was developed at Delft University of Technology (2016). The formulation of the SWAN wave model imposes a number of restrictions which should be acknowledged. While the model may be used on domains of any scale, its use in oceanic scale domains is not recommended for reasons of computation efficiency compared to models such as WAM and WaveWatchIII. Additionally, the spectral formulation of the model limits its ability to accurately model wave diffraction and some surf zone processes such as wave setup (in a twodimensional simulation). Despite these limitations, the SWAN model is considered an industry-standard spectral wave generation and propagation model and, with appropriate acknowledgment and allowance for such limitations, provides accurate and robust values. D.3 Computational Domain Correct representation of natural bathymetry within the model computational domain is critical to simulating representative wave propagation and transformation processes. D.3.1 Data Sources Sources of bathymetric data of the Eurobodalla Shire region used within this study are presented in Table D-1. Topographic data was sourced from the most recent available LIDAR (2005 within Batemans Bay and 2011 elsewhere). Bathymetry is shown for each model domain in Figure D-2 to Figure D-5. WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-1

Table D-1: Available Bathymetric Survey Data for the Study Region Location Source Survey Date Grid Reference System Datum (1,2,3) Maloneys Beach OEH Hydrosurvey 24/7/2014 GDA94/MGA Zone 56 AHD Long Beach OEH Hydrosurvey 29/7/2014 GDA94/MGA Zone 56 AHD Surfside Beach OEH Hydrosurvey 30/7/2014 GDA94/MGA Zone 56 AHD (east and west) Malua Bay OEH Hydrosurvey 30/7/2014 GDA94/MGA Zone 56 AHD Guerilla Bay OEH Hydrosurvey 29/7/2014 GDA94/MGA Zone 56 AHD Barlings Beach OEH Hydrosurvey 1/4/2015 GDA94/MGA Zone 56 AHD Tomakin Cove OEH Hydrosurvey 1/4/2015 GDA94/MGA Zone 56 AHD Broulee Beach OEH Hydrosurvey 1/4/2015 GDA94/MGA Zone 56 AHD Bengello Beach OEH Hydrosurvey 1/4/2015 GDA94/MGA Zone 56 AHD Batemans Bay Bar RMS Hydrosurvey 8/7/2015 GDA94/MGA Zone 56 BBHD Batemans Bay NSW Marine Park 2007-2012 GDA94/MGA Zone 56 AHD Marine Parks Authority Survey Batemans Bay OEH Hydrosurvey 1986-87 AGD66/ISG Zone56/1 BBHD Batemans Bay OEH Hydrosurvey 5-8/12/1995 AGD66/ISG Zone56/1 BBHD Deepwater Bed Australian varied GDA94/MGA Zone 56 LAT Elevation Hydrographic Service (AHS) Notes: (1) BBHD = Batemans Bay Hydro Datum = -0.889 m AHD. (2) LAT = Lowest Astronomical Tide = -0.850 m AHD. (3) AHD = Australian Height Datum Mean Sea Level (MSL). D.3.2 Model Domains Four (4) model domains were constructed to represent different scales and regions of the ESC region, shown in Figure D-1. These domains include: 1. Coarse Eurobodalla Domain (Figure D-2) extends 56 km from Brush Island (Bawley Point) in the north to Toragy Point (Moruya Heads) in the south and at least 15 km offshore to ensure that model boundary effects did not influence the wave characteristics reaching the beaches in the study area. This coarse model domain has a spatial resolution of 100 m and was primarily used as a transformation model to simulate wave propagation from an offshore location to the nearshore. 2. Durras Model Domain (Figure D-3) this is a nested grid with a spatial resolution of 25 m. This model domain is centred around Durras Beach and Cookies Beach, and is used to simulate wave propagation at these locations. 3. Batemans Bay Domain (Figure D-4) this is a nested grid with a spatial resolution of 25 m, centred around Batemans Bay. It is used to simulate wave propagation for beaches between (and including) Maloneys Beach and Sunshine Bay. 4. Moruya Domain (Figure D-5) - this is a nested grid with a spatial resolution of 25 m, covering the southern extent of the study area. It is used to simulate wave propagation for beaches between (and including) Malua Bay and Bengello Beach. The parameters used to define the position of each model domain are provided in Table D-2. WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-2

Figure D-1: SWAN model domains Table D-2: Summary of Model Domain characteristics Domain Parameter East North Coordinate - Lower Left Corner 242,250 6,010,250 Coarse Size (km) 56 26 Resolution 100 100 # Cells 260 560 Coordinate - Lower Left Corner 253,250 6,042,500 Durras Size (km) 9.5 15.75 Resolution 25 25 # Cells 380 630 Coordinate - Lower Left Corner 244,250 6,035,250 Batemans Bay Size (km) 12 12 Resolution 25 15 # Cells 480 480 Coordinate - Lower Left Corner 242,250 6,021,750 Moruya Size (km) 11 15.5 Resolution 25 25 # Cells 440 620 WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-3

Figure D-2: Eurobodalla Coarse model domain bathymetry WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-4

Figure D-3: Durras model domain bathymetry WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-5

Figure D-4: Batemans Bay model domain bathymetry WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-6

Figure D-5: Moruya model domain bathymetry WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-7

D.3.3 Output Locations For each model simulation, spatial maps of wave height, period and direction have been generated for the four (4) model domains. More detailed information including significant wave height, mean and peak period and direction and depth have also been provided for 33 locations within the study area. These locations are shown in Figure D-6, Figure D-7 and Figure D-8. Figure D-6: Output locations for the Durras region Figure D-7: Output locations for the Batemans Bay region WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-8

Figure D-8: Output locations for the Moruya region Rather than specify a single point offshore of a coastal location, information was extracted along transect lines from pre-breaking to the shoreline. This is due to the significant amount of wave transformation which occurs immediately prior to breaking. When an arbitrary output point is specified, the location may be well offshore of the surf zone and will not include final, nearshore transformation or may be inside the surf zone where some loss of spectral wave height through offshore breaking of larger waves has already occurred. By extracting information along a transect, wave conditions at the outer edge of the surf zone may be extracted using the wave breaking fraction. The outer edge of the surf zone is assumed to occur when the wave breaking fraction reaches 1% and wave conditions were extracted and output for that location. D.4 SWAN Wave Simulations D.4.1 Wave Parameters SWAN modelling was undertaken using the model parameters and coefficients shown in Table D-3. Sensitivity tests were undertaken on some coefficients, however some were determined based on WRL s past wave modelling experience. WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-9

Table D-3: SWAN Modelling Setup and Parameters Model Physics Physics mode (generation) 3rd Wave growth formulation Komen et al. (1984) Triad wave-wave interaction On Nonlinear quadruplet wave interaction On Whitecapping On Wave breaking model Battjes and Janssen (1978) Α 1 H max /d (γ) 0.73 Bottom friction (JONSWAP) 0.067 (default) Model Numerics Model Run Mode Stationary, Two dimensional Iterations 15 Spectral Parameters Spectral Shape at Boundary JONSWAP Peak Enhancement Factor 3.3 (default) Period Peak Standard Deviation of Directional Spreading 30 º Diffraction Off (recommended) Directional Space Parameters Directional Range 360 º Directional Resolution 10 º Frequency Space Parameters No. Frequency Bins 32 Min. Frequency 0.05 Max. Frequency 1 D.4.2 Scenarios Main model scenarios corresponding to 1, 20 and 100 year ARI events (1 hour duration) from directions between north-east and south have been simulated. Event directions have been undertaken at 22.5 increments. The wave height and direction at the model boundaries of the coarse grid were manually adjusted to ensure that the target wave conditions were reproduced at the Batemans Bay wave buoy location. A summary of main scenarios is presented within Table D-4. Table D-4 also shows the median wave conditions at each beach (based on the following wave conditions at the Batemans Bay wave buoy: H S = 1.30 m, T P = 9.5 s, SE direction see Shand et al. 2010 and Coghlan, 2010), which are provided for comparison. WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-10

Table D-4: SWAN Main Model Scenarios and Environmental Forcing Factors (1 hour duration) Scenario NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S ARI Water Level (m AHD) Conditions at Batemans Bay Offshore Wave Buoy 1 0.51 3 11.6 Domain Wind Conditions Hs (m) Tp (s) Dp ( ) V (m/s) Dir ( ) 16.3 20 1.37 5 12.8 45 20.1 100 1.43 6.2 13.4 22.2 1 0.51 3 11.6 16.3 20 1.37 5 12.8 67.5 20.1 100 1.43 6.2 13.4 22.2 1 0.51 3.7 11.6 16.3 20 1.37 6.1 12.8 90 20.1 100 1.43 7.3 13.4 22.2 1 0.51 4.9 11.6 19.3 20 1.37 6.8 12.8 112.5 23.8 100 1.43 7.7 13.4 26.4 1 0.51 4.9 11.6 19.3 20 1.37 6.8 12.8 135 23.8 100 1.43 7.7 13.4 26.4 1 0.51 4.9 11.6 19.3 20 1.37 6.8 12.8 157.5 23.8 100 1.43 7.7 13.4 26.4 1 0.51 3.7 11.6 18.3 20 1.37 6.1 12.8 180 22.6 100 1.43 7.3 13.4 25.0 SE median 0.00 1.3 9.5 135 - - 45 67.5 90 112.5 135 157.5 180 Additional wave model scenarios were run, but the environmental conditions and resulting wave heights are not presented in this report for brevity. Scenarios include: The 100 year ARI wave conditions with a duration of 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 96 hours and 144 hours (for SBEACH erosion modelling and Durras Lake tailwater conditions); The 20 year ARI wave conditions with a duration of 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 96 hours and 144 hours (for Durras Lake tailwater conditions); The 1 year ARI wave conditions with a duration of 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hour and 48 hours (for Durras Lake tailwater conditions); The wave height exceeded for 12 hours per year (0.137% exceedance) for Hallermeier (1983) outer depth of closure calculations; and The 10% exceedance wave height (for SBEACH erosion modelling and Durras Lake tailwater conditions). While the 20 and 100 year ARI events wave conditions have been combined with the 20 and 100 year ARI events for water level conditions (tide plus anomaly), respectively, 1 year ARI wave conditions have been combined with the Mean High Water (MHW) level (0.51 m AHD) as previously agreed with OEH. This wave and water level combination is considered more WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-11

representative of that which would result in 1 year ARI coastal inundation rather than assuming complete dependence of the variables (i.e. 1 year ARI waves and 1 year ARI water level). D.4.3 Diffraction at Cullendulla The dominant dissipative processes behind Square Head at Cullendulla are diffraction and refraction. Therefore, at this location, desktop methods were preferred to using the SWAN wave model whose diffraction approximation does not properly handle diffraction into bays around large headlands (Delft University of Technology, 2016). To estimate the diffracted wave height at Cullendulla, the irregular wave diffraction diagram for waves passing through a structure gap with B/L = 2.0 (ratio of entrance width to local wavelength) and S MAX = 75 (directional spreading function; value appropriate for swell waves) published by Goda (2000) was overlain on the study area as shown in Figure D-9. A diffraction factor of 0.35 was used for design. D.5 Results Figure D-9: Irregular Wave Diffraction Coefficients at Cullendulla Examples of SWAN output for each model grid for the 100 year ARI event from the east-south-east (ESE) are shown in Figure D-10, Figure D-11, Figure D-12 and Figure D-13. For each output location (coordinates in MGA Zone 56), wave conditions for each direction scenario were evaluated and maximum conditions (at outer breakpoint) are summarised in Table D-5. The median wave statistics originating from a south easterly (SE) direction are also included for comparison. Output locations are shown in Figure D-14 to Figure D-23. WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-12

Note that the bed elevations referred to in Table D-5 are for present day (2017) conditions only. No changes were made to the bathymetry grids to represent possible future changes to the seabed due to projected sea level rise. WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-13

Figure D-10: Example of 100 year ARI east south-east event for the Eurobodalla Coarse model domain WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-14

Figure D-11: Example of 100 year ARI east south-east event for the Durras model domain WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-15

Figure D-12: Example of 100 year ARI east south-east event for the Batemans Bay model domain WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-16

Figure D-13: Example of 100 year ARI east south-east event for the Moruya model domain WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-17

Table D-5: Maximum Wave Conditions at the Outer Breakpoint of the Surf Zone Beach Profile North Durras Central South Cookies - East Maloneys West ARI (year) Easting (m) Northing (m) Bed Elevation (m AHD) Offshore Wave Direction ( ) Hs (m) Tp (s) Peak Direction ( ) Median 255806 6052180-3.3 SE 1.1 9.2 125 1 255962 6052102-6.0 SE 3.4 11.2 125 20 256051 6052057-7.4 SE 4.2 12.3 125 100 256095 6052034-8.0 SSE 4.5 13.6 135 Median 255447 6051552-3.1 SE 1.0 9.2 115 1 255617 6051510-5.8 ESE 3.4 11.2 115 20 255762 6051474-7.7 ESE 4.4 12.3 115 100 255811 6051461-8.4 ESE 4.7 13.6 115 Median 255260 6050876-2.3 SE 0.8 9.2 95 1 255410 6050874-5.2 ESE 3.0 11.2 95 20 255708 6050872-8.3 ESE 4.6 12.3 95 100 255758 6050871-8.9 ESE 5.0 13.6 95 Median 255364 6050132-2.8 SE 0.7 9.2 75 1 255723 6050238-5.9 ESE 3.4 11.2 85 20 255818 6050266-7.8 ESE 4.4 12.3 95 100 255866 6050280-8.6 E 4.8 13.6 95 Median 251181 6044556-2.9 SE 0.4 9.2 215 1 251196 6044576-1.4 SSE 1.1 12.3 215 20 251196 6044576-1.4 S 1.3 13.6 215 100 251181 6044556-2.9 S 1.5 13.6 205 Median 250736 6044748-1.6 SE 0.5 9.2 185 1 250733 6044724-2.8 SSE 1.5 11.2 175 20 250733 6044724-2.8 SSE 1.8 12.3 185 100 250733 6044724-2.8 S 1.9 13.6 185 WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-18

Table D-5: Maximum Wave Conditions at the Outer Breakpoint of the Surf Zone (cont ) Beach Profile East Long Central West Cullendulla - North Surfside E South Surfside W - ARI (year) Easting (m) Northing (m) Bed Elevation (m AHD) Offshore Wave Direction ( ) Hs (m) Tp (s) Peak Direction ( ) Median 249569 6045434-1.8 SE 0.4 9.2 175 1 249566 6045410-2.5 SSE 1.6 11.2 175 20 249563 6045386-3.2 SSE 1.9 12.3 175 100 249563 6045386-3.2 SSE 2.0 13.6 175 Median 249315 6045432-3.1 SE 0.4 9.2 165 1 249315 6045432-3.1 SSE 1.8 11.2 165 20 249318 6045408-4.4 SSE 2.3 12.3 165 100 249318 6045408-4.4 SSE 2.4 13.6 165 Median 248403 6045008-2.9 SE 0.7 9.2 145 1 248429 6044966-5.0 SSE 2.6 11.2 155 20 248442 6044944-6.0 SSE 3.0 12.3 155 100 248442 6044944-6.0 SSE 3.1 13.6 155 Median 246963* 6045588* -1.0 SE 0.2 9.2 185 1 246963* 6045588* -1.0 SSE 0.8 11.2 175 20 246963* 6045588* -1.0 SSE 0.9 12.3 175 100 246963* 6045588* -1.0 SSE 0.9 13.6 175 Median 246480 6045396-2.3 SE 0.3 9.2 145 1 246465 6045416-1.5 SSE 1.2 11.2 145 20 246465 6045416-1.5 SSE 1.4 12.3 145 100 246480 6045396-2.3 SSE 1.5 13.6 145 Median 246246 6045242-1.7 SE 0.4 9.2 135 1 246246 6045242-1.7 SE 1.4 11.2 135 20 246263 6045224-2.3 SSE 1.6 12.3 135 100 246263 6045224-2.3 SE 1.6 13.6 135 Median 245793 6045159-1.1 SE 0.2 9.2 145 1 245793 6045159 0.1 SE 0.6 11.2 155 20 245793 6045159 0.1 SSE 0.7 12.3 155 100 245793 6045159 0.1 SSE 0.7 13.6 155 *Approximate location only, determined using a diffraction factor of 0.35 WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-19

Table D-5: Maximum Wave Conditions at the Outer Breakpoint of the Surf Zone (cont ) Beach Profile Wharf Rd - CBD Boat Harbour Corrigans West Central East - North South ARI (year) Easting (m) Northing (m) Bed Elevation (m AHD) Offshore Wave Direction ( ) Hs (m) Tp (s) Peak Direction ( ) Median 245555 6044795-0.8 SE 0.2 2.4 105 1 245555 6044795-0.6 ESE 0.9 11.2 105 20 245555 6044795-0.6 ESE 1.0 12.3 105 100 245555 6044795-0.6 ESE 1.1 13.6 105 Median 245419 6044788-0.3 SE 0.1 1.2 105 1 245419 6044788-0.3 SE 0.8 11.2 105 20 245419 6044788-0.3 ESE 0.9 12.3 105 100 245419 6044788-0.3 ESE 0.9 13.6 105 Median 245567 6044546-0.5 SE 0.4 9.2 85 1 245567 6044546-0.5 ESE 0.9 11.2 85 20 245567 6044546-0.5 ESE 1.0 12.3 85 100 245567 6044546-0.5 ESE 1.0 13.6 85 Median 245567 6044546-0.5 SE 0.4 9.2 85 1 245567 6044546-0.5 ESE 0.9 11.2 85 20 245567 6044546-0.5 ESE 1.0 12.3 85 100 245567 6044546-0.5 ESE 1.0 13.6 85 Median 246636 6043788-2.0 SE 0.6 9.2 95 1 246636 6043788-2.0 ESE 1.5 11.2 105 20 246636 6043788-2.0 ESE 1.7 12.3 105 100 246636 6043788-2.0 ESE 1.7 13.6 105 Median 246598 6043462-2.3 SE 0.5 9.2 85 1 246598 6043462-2.3 ESE 1.4 11.2 85 20 246918 6043432-2.8 ESE 2.0 12.3 95 100 246918 6043432-2.8 ESE 2.0 13.6 95 Median 246629 6042705-1.9 SE 0.4 4.7 75 1 246629 6042705-1.9 ESE 1.1 11.2 85 20 246629 6042705-1.9 ESE 1.2 12.3 85 100 246629 6042705-1.9 ESE 1.3 13.6 85 WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-20

Table D-5: Maximum Wave Conditions at the Outer Breakpoint of the Surf Zone (cont ) Beach Profile North Caseys Central South Sunshine - Malua - Guerilla - ARI (year) Easting (m) Northing (m) Bed Elevation (m AHD) Offshore Wave Direction ( ) Hs (m) Tp (s) Peak Direction ( ) Median 247457 6042028-1.8 SE 0.5 9.2 95 1 247481 6042030-2.9 ESE 1.8 12.3 95 20 247481 6042030-2.9 ESE 2.0 12.3 95 100 247506 6042032-3.6 ENE 2.2 13.6 95 Median 247507 6041785-1.9 SE 0.4 9.2 75 1 247507 6041785-1.9 ESE 1.4 12.3 75 20 247527 6041798-2.7 E 1.7 13.6 75 100 247527 6041798-2.7 ENE 1.8 13.6 75 Median 247642 6041622-1.8 SE 0.4 9.2 35 1 247627 6041602-1.3 ESE 1.2 11.2 55 20 247642 6041622-1.8 E 1.4 12.3 55 100 247642 6041622-1.8 NE 1.5 13.6 45 Median 247963 6041129-1.4 SE 0.4 4.7 55 1 248167 6041224-5.9 ESE 3.1 11.2 115 20 248234 6041254-7.0 ESE 3.9 12.3 115 100 248234 6041254-7.0 ESE 4.0 13.6 115 Median 249857 6035412-2.9 SE 1.1 9.2 115 1 249977 6035384-6.9 ESE 3.7 11.2 115 20 250122 6035351-10.7 ESE 5.5 12.3 115 100 250194 6035334-12.0 ESE 6.4 13.6 115 Median 249374 6031600-2.6 SE 0.5 9.2 65 1 249415 6031626-4.2 ESE 2.5 11.2 75 20 249498 6031678-7.5 ESE 4.0 12.3 85 100 249498 6031678-7.5 E 4.3 13.6 75 WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-21

Table D-5: Maximum Wave Conditions at the Outer Breakpoint of the Surf Zone (cont ) Beach Profile East Barlings West Tomakin - North Broulee Central South ARI (year) Easting (m) Northing (m) Bed Elevation (m AHD) Offshore Wave Direction ( ) Hs (m) Tp (s) Peak Direction ( ) Median 247172 6031325-2.2 SE 0.6 9.2 185 1 247170 6031300-3.1 SSE 2.0 11.2 175 20 247168 6031275-3.9 S 2.5 12.3 165 100 247165 6031250-4.4 S 2.8 13.6 165 Median 246731 6031218-3.8 SE 1.0 9.2 145 1 246754 6031174-5.4 SSE 3.2 11.2 145 20 246765 6031152-6 SSE 3.4 12.3 155 100 246765 6031152-6 S 3.5 13.6 155 Median 246403 6031042-2.0 SE 0.6 9.2 135 1 246502 6030930-6.3 SE 3.2 11.2 145 20 246519 6030912-6.8 ESE 3.6 12.3 145 100 246519 6030912-6.8 ESE 3.7 13.6 145 Median 245306 6029683-2.5 SE 0.9 9.2 115 1 245404 6029606-5.0 ESE 2.9 11.2 115 20 245443 6029576-5.7 ESE 3.4 12.3 115 100 245443 6029576-5.7 ESE 3.5 13.6 115 Median 245224 6029049-1.9 SE 0.5 9.2 85 1 245273 6029050-3.2 ESE 1.9 11.2 95 20 245298 6029050-3.6 ESE 2.4 12.3 95 100 245322 6029051-3.9 E 2.6 13.6 95 Median 245359 6028478-1.6 SE 0.4 9.2 55 1 245406 6028496-2.4 ESE 1.4 11.2 65 20 245406 6028496-2.4 ESE 1.7 12.3 65 100 245406 6028496-2.4 E 1.8 13.6 65 WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-22

Figure D-14: SWAN Output Locations: Durras Beach and Cookies Beach Figure D-15: SWAN Output Locations: Maloneys Beach WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-23

Figure D-16: SWAN Output Locations: Long Beach Figure D-17: SWAN Output Locations: Inner Batemans Bay Beaches WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-24

Figure D-18: SWAN Output Locations: Corrigans Beach Figure D-19: SWAN Output Locations: Caseys Beach and Sunshine Bay WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-25

Figure D-20: SWAN Output Locations: Malua Bay Figure D-21: SWAN Output Locations: Guerilla Bay WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-26

Figure D-22: SWAN Output Locations: Tomakin Cove and Barlings Beach Figure D-23: SWAN Output Locations: Broulee Beach WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-27

D.6 Historical Nearshore Wave Photos On 4-6 June 2012, a severe storm with offshore significant wave heights of 6 m (typical T P = 13 s, south-easterly wave direction, maximum water level 1.3 m AHD) had a large impact upon beaches within Batemans Bay. During this event, Mr Lindsay Usher of ESC photographed the nearshore wave conditions on 6 June 2012 at Long Beach (central section, Figure D-24) and Surfside Beach (east) (northern end, Figure D-25). Based on interpolation of existing SWAN results, WRL estimates that the significant wave heights at outer edge of the surf zone of these beaches at the peak of the storm to be 2.0 m and 1.3 m, respectively. These local wave heights are considered to have an approximate average recurrence interval of 5 years. WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-28

Figure D-24: Nearshore Waves at Long Beach, 6 June 2012 (Mr Lindsay Usher) Figure D-25: Nearshore Waves at Surfside Beach (East), 6 June 2012 (Mr Lindsay Usher) WRL Technical Report 2017/09 FINAL OCTOBER 2017 D-29