Panel Discussion: Tack Coat - Storage and Handling - Sampling and Testing

Similar documents
NCHRP Project Synthesis Topic Tack Coat Specifications, Materials, and Construction Practices

Challenges of Tack Coat

NCHRP Project 9-40 Update Optimization of Tack coat for HMA Placement

GOOD AFTERNOON!!! 2012 FDOT / FTBA Conference. Dave Drehmer. Mariani Asphalt an Associated Asphalt Company

Tack Coat Effect on Field Performance. February 3rd, 2015 NCAUPG/ICT Joint Meeting

Illinois Center for Transportation

ASPHALT PAVING LEVEL 1

Project Review Committee

TRACKLESS TACK/ SPRAY PAVERS

High Performance Racetracks

Compaction Theory and Best Practices

Binder Modified with a Combination of PPA and SBS: The NCAT Test Track Experience PPA Workshop April 7, 2009

1. SCOPE 2. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS. 2.1 SC Test Methods SC-T Forms SCDOT Electronic Forms SUMMARY OF TEST METHOD

Advantages & Specifications for the Use of Perma-Patch for the Repair of Potholes

Low Traffic Volume LR 159 Low Traffic Preservation

Update on Performance of Thin Asphalt Overlays

Burns Cooley Dennis, Inc. Geotechnical and Materials Engineering Consultants Performance of Permeable Friction Courses NCHRP 9-41

Managing Density For Asphalt Pavement

BEST PRACTICE FOR COMPACTING WARM AND HOT MIX ASPHALT NEAUPG OCTOBER 7,2009

Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Quality Assurance

Chip Seals, Slurry Seals & Micro Surfacing

Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Quality Assurance

NZQA registered unit standard version 3 Page 1 of 8. Operate bitumen gangbar sprayer transfer, heating, and blending equipment

Asphalt Mixture Quality Acceptance

ADDENDUM REPORT. Project: Bid Package: 2 Current Let: 06/24/ :00 AM Version: Addendum Addendum : 1

"Emul Asph (SS-1HP) Tack".

***PROJECT NO AWARDED TO E.S. WAGNER VIA RESOLUTION NO ON JANUARY 19, 2016***

Asphalt Mixture Quality Assurance

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION. Asphalt Update. Howie Moseley State Bituminous Materials Engineer

SUPERPAVE Construction Lessons Learned. NEAUPG Annual Meeting Wilkes-Barre, PA October 23, 2003

Using RAP in Asphalt Mixtures

Performance of Ultra-Thin Bounded Wearing Course (UTBWC) Surface Treatment on US-169 Princeton, Minnesota. Transportation Research

Non-State Federal Aid Highways. Pavement Condition Ratings. H e r k i m e r a n d O n e i d a C o u n t i e s

Burns Cooley Dennis, Inc. Burns Cooley Dennis, Inc.

CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN GUIDELINES ASPHALT CONCRETE

Bids MAY 24, 2018 AT 2:00 P.M. (EASTERN) (Estimated Cost: $7,500,000.00)

EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND ROADWAYS MILEPOST TO MILEPOST OTTAWA AND SANDUSKY COUNTIES, OHIO

NOTES FOR FIRST COAT SEALING

B741 - TEMPORARY CONCRETE BARRIERS - OPSS 741

DRAFT WSDOT PAVEMENT POLICY

ROLLER COMPACTED CONCRETE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERMODAL TERMINALS

OHD L-44 METHOD OF TEST FOR MEASUREMENT OF WATER PERMEABILITY OF COMPACTED PAVING MIXTURES

Pavement and Asset Management from a City s Perspective Mike Rief, PE, DBIA and Andrea Azary, EIT. February 12, 2015

NZQA registered unit standard version 3 Page 1 of 7. Demonstrate knowledge of bitumen gangbar sprayers and operations

PRECISION ESTIMATES OF AASHTO T324, HAMBURG WHEEL-TRACK TESTING OFCOMPACTED HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) APPENDICES FOR FINAL REPORT

MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION PLANS FOR PROPOSED STATE HIGHWAY DESIGN DESIGNATION INDEX OF SHEETS LENGTH OF PROJECT SHEET NUMBER

Free Floating Screed. Screed Weight Forward Motion. Head of Material. Material Stability. Angle of Attack

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

T-24. A Practical Approach to Managing Density

OHD L-44 METHOD OF TEST FOR MEASUREMENT OF WATER PERMEABILITY OF COMPACTED PAVING MIXTURES

SUPPORTING NOTES FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNBOUND ROAD BASE AND SUB-BASE AGGREGATES

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SURFACE RUN-OFF BEHAVIOUR OF BITUMEN EMULSIONS USED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEALS ABSTRACT

Tennessee Fights Roadway Departure Crashes

MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION PLANS FOR PROPOSED STATE HIGHWAY DESIGN DESIGNATION INDEX OF SHEETS LENGTH OF PROJECT SHEET 1 COUNTY

BOND EXPECTATIONS FOR ASPHALT CONCRETE LAYERS APPLIED TO MILLED SURFACES IN VIRGINIA

HIR on Oklahoma Turnpikes

HCMTCB MATERIALS SAMPLING & TESTING PERFORMANCE CHECKLIST

Five Years Later. Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association Annual Meeting March 9, William J. Pine, P.E. Emulsicoat, Inc. / Heritage Research

FINAL REPORT FOR NCHRP (375) Improvements to Dry-Back Procedure of AASHTO T 209. December 2017

SECTION 48 - TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Best Practices for Smoothness & Density

Asphalt Binder Quality Test (ABQT)

SECTION 48 - TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

County of Sacramento Standard Construction Specifications January 1, 2008 TECHNICAL PROVISIONS

Separating Load from Moisture Effects in Wet Hamburg Wheel-Track Test

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

RoadNews 14 // September VÖGELE pavers rehabilitate race track in Brno, Czech Republic. Paving at Top Speed

Kraton Ultra-thin HMA / WMA Overlay Study

OHD L-47. Guidelines for Resolving Differences in Test Results

Use of Roller Compacted Concrete By GDOT. Presented By: Joe W. Sheffield, PE Georgia Department of Transportation District Engineer, Tifton, GA

Bids DECEMBER 21, 2018 AT 2:00 P.M. (EASTERN) (Estimated Cost: $4,700,000.00)

AMAP 15 th Annual Meeting February 18-20, Mike O Leary MWV RMAUPG

A SYNTHESIS OF CURRENT PRACTICES

Kentucky s Surface Transportation System

Introduction to Full Depth Asphalt Repairs. Setting Work Processes for a Quality Job Start in time to finish prior to Winter!

SPECIFYING MOTIONLESS MIXERS

PAVEMENT FUNCTIONAL SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS

Driving Indiana s Economic Growth

FHWA/IN/JTRP-2009/22. Final Report. Rebecca S. McDaniel Karol J. Kowalski Ayesha Shah Jan Olek Robert J. Bernhard

IN-PLACE DENSITY OF BITUMINOUS MIXES USING THE NUCLEAR MOISTURE-DENSITY GAUGE FOP FOR WAQTC TM 8

Q AGGREGATE / EMULSION MATERIALS for Washington County Departments

Test Method for Measurement of Stability and Resistance to Compaction, Vertical and Lateral Displacement of Multilayered Fine Aggregate Cold Mixes

Florida Method of Test for MEASUREMENT OF WATER PERMEABILITY OF COMPACTED ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENT 1055 ASPHALT MAT DENSITY BY GAUGE TESTING. January 15, 2016

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

Study of the Effects of Buried Pipe Integrity on Roadway Subsidence

Asphalt Recycling and Pavement Preservation in Hillsborough County, Florida

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENT 1055 ASPHALT MAT DENSITY BY GAUGE TESTING. April 18, 2014

TexSys: Guide for Selecting HMA for Texas Flexible Pavements

Downloaded from Downloaded from /1

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA EVALUATION OF ROAD PAVEMENT CRACKS IN MALAYSIA

Join us at 2016 Ohio Asphalt Expo OHIO S PREMIER ASPHALT EVENT

Appendix B Existing ADOT Data Parameters

ROAD MAINTENANCE. Back to Basics. Duane A. Blanck, P.E MAT Spring Short Course

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

BASICS OF ASPHALT PAVING: SCREEDS. Kevin Jeske Great Lakes Regional Manager

Transcription:

Panel Discussion: Tack Coat - Storage and Handling - Sampling and Testing 2018 SCAPA Winter Conference Timothy Owings Associated Asphalt James Ross Blacklidge Emulsions Bob Horan, PE Asphalt Institute

Our Visit Today Why is tack coat a must have for asphalt pavement construction? NCHRP Synthesis: Tack Coat Specifications, Materials and Construction Practices Authored by AI Publication spring 2018 Panel Discussion (questions and answers) Storage and handling best practices Sampling best practices

Tack Coat Workshops 2015-2016 2700 attendees in 47 workshops; 3100 in 35 presentations SCDOT Tack Coat Workshop November 2015

Why Is Tack Coat a Must Have? The purpose of tack is to bond the asphalt pavement layer being placed to the underlying layer Good bonding is important during compaction and for long-term performance of the pavement Must Have for compaction process A good tack coat prevents slippage during compaction to confine the layer being constructed which helps to obtain density Must Have for long term performance This bond is essential to obtain a long-life pavement The consequences of a loss of bond is early pavement distress Early distress means shorter-than-desired service life

Consequences of Poor Bonding Layer independence Slippage Delamination Reduced fatigue life Increased rutting Compaction difficulty Mat is not confined Direction of traffic?

Tack Coat Application Biggest Challenge: Consistently getting uniform coverage

Conclusion Right materials, Right handling & storage, Right application rate, Uniform coverage are Must Haves for a Well Performing Pavement

Sections of the Synthesis Introduction Literature Review Survey Results Case Examples Conclusions Appendices

Sections of the Synthesis Introduction Literature Review Survey Results Case Examples Conclusions Appendices

What Exactly Is a Synthesis? A report that assembles and disseminates information on a topic of current highway practice. Tack Coat Synthesis: Authored by Asphalt Institute Develops along with technical panel Publication spring 2018

Survey - excellent response rate 41 Questions Tack Coat Payment Specs 2 questions Tack Coat Materials 4 questions Tack Coat Application 28 questions Tack Coat Evaluation 7 questions 7 Provinces 50 States

How is tack paid for? 34% 66% Individual Pay Item Incidental to Paving Why is this important? Little incentive for sufficient tack application if not a direct pay item

Percentage of Materials Used 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0.4% 79.4% 0.0% 20.2%

Top 5 Emulsions Used State Survey 1.CSS-1h (52%) 2.Non-standard* (48%) 3.SS-1h (46%) 4.SS-1 (36%) 5.CSS-1 (28%) * Non-standard means that a state has come up with its own nomenclature for an emulsion, outside those specified in AASHTO M 140 (Anionic Emulsions), M 208 (Cationic Emulsions), or M 316 (Polymer-Modified Cationic Emulsions) Examples: SS-1hp, CRS-2h, EBL

SCDOT Tack Materials Based on response NCHRP Tack Coat Synthesis and discussions with SCDOT Tack Material % of Total CRS-1; CRS 1h 30% HFMS-1; HFMS-2 30% CRS-2 30% Generic Reduced Track 9% PG 64-22 1% OGFC may require hot applied trackless tack to promote bond and reduce raveling (special provision)

Sections of the Synthesis Publication Spring 2018

Panel Discussion Questions and Answers: Feel free to ask any question related to tack coat materials, application, etc. Focus on two important factors that suppliers are asked about a lot: Handling and storage of emulsified asphalt Proper storage and handling is important Follow suppliers recommendations Sampling and testing of emulsified asphalt Where should samples be taken? Follow agency and suppliers recommendations

Storage Tanks Long-term storage. Vertical generally preferred. Heated. Store toward lowest pumpable temperature Agitation. Low-shear Minimize frequency Hoses. Keep clean 18

Tanker Storage Short-term storage. Generally not heated. Generally can not agitate. 19

Distributor Storage Short-term storage Heated Pump circulation 20

Questions?

What are average application rates?