Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

Similar documents
Traffic Safety Facts. State Traffic Data Data. Overview

States. Postal Abbreviations LEARN THE. AND. by Joy A. Miller

2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

Understanding the Regional Divergence in Adult Mortality in the United States

USA TRIATHLON MEMBERSHIP REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE C: STATE MANDATES AND FUNDING LEVELS

Are Highways Crumbling? State Performance Summaries,

SECTION SEVEN. Characteristics of People with IDD and Staff in Large Public Residential Facilities

17t h Ann u a l Re p o r t on th e ( ) POLICY STUDY

SEASON FINAL REGISTRATION REPORTS

2016 River Use Statistics -by Steve Sullivan

U.S MINT STATE DUCKS SALE

Conduent EDI Solutions, Inc. Eligibility Gateway 270/271 Payer Guide Medicaid

Xerox EDI Eligibility Gateway 270/271 Payer Guide

HANDICAP ACTIVE AND INACTIVE SEASON SCHEDULE

SIA SNOW SPORTS PARTICIPANT STUDY

A Comparison of Highway Construction Costs in the Midwest and Nationally

SUMMARY MEMBERSHIP ANALYSIS FOR THE STATE OF. New Hampshire. Trends of first-time 4 to 8 year-old male ice hockey players to

SUMMARY MEMBERSHIP ANALYSIS FOR THE STATE OF. Trends of first-time 4 to 8 year-old male ice hockey players to

SUMMARY MEMBERSHIP ANALYSIS FOR THE STATE OF. Trends of first-time 4 to 8 year-old male ice hockey players to

SUMMARY MEMBERSHIP ANALYSIS FOR THE STATE OF. Trends of first-time 4 to 8 year-old male ice hockey players to

Education Committee Economic Background and Issue Review

Anatomy of a Jackpot: Characteristics of Purchasers of Large Jackpot Lottery Tickets

2009 National Pharmacist Workforce Study. Visual Data

TABLE 3. Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds 2017

Traffic Safety Facts 2007 Data

Occupant Protection Laws

CHAPTER 6. APPENDICES

ECONOMIC IMP ACT REPORT 2018

Population of Puerto Rico (Millions of people)

Occupant Protection Laws

Black Homicide Victimization in the Great Lakes States

The 2019 Economic Outlook Forum The Outlook for MS

Zions Bank Municipal Conference Economic Overview August 13, 2015

Back in the Black. States Gambling Revenues Rose in Introduction Gambling revenues to states rose modestly in fiscal 2010, HIGHLIGHTS

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

More of the Same; Or now for Something Completely Different?

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2006

Occupant Protection Laws

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2011

Regional Summit on GROWING STATE ECONOMIES Nashville, TN November 14, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Research: Highlights. Abdul Ali, Ph.D.

SHOOTING IN AMERICA. An Economic Force for Conservation 2018 EDITION

Bikes Belong Survey: The Size & Impact of Road Riding Events

Occupant Protection Laws

Table B-8: U.S. Medical School MD-PhD Applications and Matriculants by School, In-State Status, and Sex,

TABLE 3. Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds 2016

Purpose of the Efficiency Program Industry By State and Region Appendices and Limitations of Data

2016 License Application Form

THE FUTURE OF SALES TAX REVENUE

STUN GUN LAWS/ REQUIREMENTS DATED

ASSOCIATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE AGENCIES HUNTING. in America AN ECONOMIC ENGINE AND CONSERVATION POWERHOUSE

ARD/RD CHAPTER ASSIGNMENTS

For the First Time, a Smaller Jackpot

COLORADO 1200 COLORADO (5H) 4.95R UPC # ISBN # TITLES IN RED ARE FIVE STAR PAPER FOLD MAPS

Annual Data Report

Legislative Economic Briefing

Catena Media analysis of how we expect sports betting to roll out across the United States of America.

Gay Gilbert, Administrator Unemployment Insurance USDOL/ETA June 22, 2016

Official Match Program

State and National Economic Effects of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Related Recreation on U.S. Forest Service-Managed Lands

Irving Marathon Sponsorship Proposal

7. Ranking the States with the Greatest Energy Intensity and Residual Effect Reductions

Washington, D.C Washington, D.C

There are three major federal data sources that we evaluate in our Bicycle Friendly States ranking:

The Walking College: Building the Local Capacity of the National Walking Movement

Zions Bank Economic Overview

Catena Media analysis of how we expect sports betting to roll out across the United States of America.

61,634 Website Traffic: Average Monthly Page Views. 24,414 Pool and Spa News Insider Newsletter Recipients Per Issue (24 issues per year)

Legal Meaning of Flashing Don't Walk - Survey Question raised by Mark Luszcz, DE Distributed 4/5/16

Pedestrian Traffic Fatalities by State

MEDICAID EXPENDITURES FOR LONG-TERM SERVICES AND SUPPORTS: 2011 UPDATE

Minimum Wages By State, Municipality and County

Exploring Recent Increases in Hunting and Fishing Participation

Legal Heat: 50 State Guide to Firearm Laws and Regulations

The Burden of HPV Related Cancers in Kentucky

Zions Bank Economic Overview

Together, we are creating a world that works better.

Are Highways Crumbling? State and U.S. Highway Performance Trends,

The Mind of the Triathlete

Appendix B. State Minimum Wage Standards with Exemptions for Agriculture and Citations

Arizona X X X 2013

DOT HS November 2009 Geospatial Analysis of Rural Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities

FARS Acc_Aux Analytical Users Manual. The Tables in this Manual Contain Fatal Crash Counts

Colorado Counties Treasurers Association

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Hunting, Shooting, and Fishing Recruitment and Retention Programs

CLIFF PENNINGTON. Oakland A s 2012 Math Educational Program. 3 rd -5 th Grade Workbook

Division I Sears Directors' Cup Final Standings

Produce Safety Alliance Course and Trainer Totals through September 19, 2018

Overview of the Regional Economy

Habit Formation in Voting: Evidence from Rainy Elections Thomas Fujiwara, Kyle Meng, and Tom Vogl ONLINE APPENDIX

FARS Acc_Aux Analytical Users Manual

Zions Bank Economic Overview

8:00 am 5:00 pm NASRO Basic Course Music Road Resort Hotel. 8:00 am 5:00 pm NASRO Basic Course - ** Music Road Resort Hotel

Zions Bank Economic Overview

United States Flags. Gauge: 28 sts = 4", though gauge is not critical. Use any yarn and a needle size that gives you a fabric you like.

Rotary Club of Pocatello Economic Overview. April 28, 2016

Zions Bank Economic Overview

America s Brightest ORANGE

Zions Bank Economic Overview Utah Bankers Association Emerging Bank Leaders Conference. November 9, 2017

Transcription:

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011 Addendum to the 2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation Report 2011-3

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011 Addendum to the 2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation Report 2011-3 June 2014 Richard Aiken U.S Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Policy and Programs Arlington, VA This report is intended to complement the National and State reports from the 2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. The conclusions are the authors and do not represent official positions of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The author thanks Sylvia Cabrera, Rob Southwick, and Matthew Fuller for their input into this report.

Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011 Target practice is a common activity for shooters preparing for hunting season. Whether it is plinking at a pop can on a hillside after a day of hunting or signing up at a shooting range for a lane, target shooting for many people is an integral part of getting ready for hunting. Improving the aim of a weapon is part of the standard procedure to prepare for hunting. The extent of target shooting by hunters is the subject of this report. The 1975, 1991 and 2011 National Surveys of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation (FHWAR) asked hunters about their target shooting and usage of shooting ranges. The hunting respondents were first asked if they target shot in preparation for hunting. If yes, they were asked if they used a shooting range. In 2011, further questions were asked about what kind of weapons were used at the shooting range. A nuance of the data is that in 1991, it was target shooting in the state of residence that was measured. In 2011, it was target shooting anywhere. Since most hunters both hunt and target shoot in their state of residence, this difference in the questions is not significant. There is no information on how big the range was, who owned it, or if it was indoor or outdoor. Table 1. Target Shooting by Hunters In Preparation for Hunting: 2011 (Population 16 years old and older. Numbers in thousands) Number Percent Percent of type of hunter Total hunters 13,674 100 (X) Target shot in preparation for hunting 7,178 52 (X) Used shooting ranges 2,943 22 (X) Target shooting by type of hunter All target shooters 7,178 100 52 Big game 6,504 91 56 Small game 2,381 33 53 Migratory bird 1,234 17 48 Other animal 1,185 17 55 Range use by type of hunter All range users 2,943 100 22 Big game 2,672 91 23 Small game 1,088 37 24 Migratory bird 514 17 20 Other animal 552 19 25 (X) These categories were not divided into types of hunting. 2 Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

Half of all hunters target shot at least once in 2011, and 40% of these target shooters used a range. Most target shooters were big game hunters (most hunters were big game hunters). Migratory bird hunters were least likely to target shoot. Most range users were big game hunters as well. And similar to target shooting, migratory bird hunters were least likely to use a range. Graph 1. Target Shooting by Type of Hunter: 1991 and 2011 Number of participants (in thousands) 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 1991 2011 All target shooters Big game Small game Migratory bird Other animal Graph 2. Shooting Range Use by Type of Hunter: 1991 and 2011 8,000 Number of participants (in thousands) 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 1991 2011 All range shooters Big game Small game Migratory bird Other animal Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011 3

Most, 79%, of all range users preparing for hunting used rifles. Also popular at ranges were shotguns, which were used by almost 40%. Next in popularity was muzzleloaders, with 19%. Fourteen percent used handguns, and another 14% used bows. Lastly, 3% practiced with a crossbow, 1% used airguns, and 2% used other equipment. Table 2. Types of weapons used at shooting ranges by hunters: 2011 (Population 16 years old and older. Numbers in thousands) Type of weapons Number Percent Total range users 2,943 100 rifle 2,322 79 shotgun 1,110 38 muzzleloader 564 19 handgun 420 14 bow and arrow 406 14 crossbow 93* 3* airgun 31* 1* other equipment 47* 2* * Sample size between 10 and 29. Graph 3. Hunting Preparation by Target Shooting at Shooting Ranges, by Firearm: 2011 3,500 Number of participants (in thousands) 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Used shooting ranges With rifle With shotgun With muzzleloader With handgun With archery equipment With other 4 Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

Hunters were roughly equal in their likelihood to target shoot throughout the country; 52% of hunters nationwide target shot and between 47% and 61% of hunters by region did. But the use of ranges by region is more diverse. East South Central hunters were least likely to use ranges; 9% of them did. Mountain and Pacific hunters were more likely; 29% of them used a range to target shoot. Whether this disparity is due to differences in shooting range access or some cultural difference is not known to this author. Table 3. Target Shooting and Range Using by Census Division: 2011 (Population 16 years old and older. Numbers in thousands) Census Division All hunters Number Target shooter Number Percent of hunters Range user Number Percent of hunters Total 13,674 7,178 52 2,943 22 New England 420 230 55 110 26 Middle Atlantic 1,558 811 52 409 26 East North Central 2,688 1,466 55 619 23 West North Central 1,661 942 57 342 21 South Atlantic 1,870 903 48 346 19 East South Central 1,531 727 47 142 9 West South Central 1,909 927 49 385 20 Mountain 1,043 635 61 300 29 Pacific 996 537 54 288 29 Map 1. Target Shooting In Preparation for Hunting in 2011 (Percent of all target shooters by Census Division) WA OR ID Mountain 9% MT WY ND SD West North Central 13% MN WI East North Central 20% MI NY ME VT NH MA CT RI New England 3% Pacific 7% CA NV UT CO NE KS IA MO IL IN KY OH WV PA VA NJ DE MD Middle Atlantic 11% AZ NM TX OK AR LA MS TN AL GA SC NC South Atlantic 13% AK HI West South Central 13% East South Central 10% FL Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011 5

Table 4. Target shooter and range user by Census Division: 2011 (Population 16 years old and older. Numbers in thousands) All hunters Target shooter Range user Census Division Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total 13,674 100 7,178 100 2,943 100 New England 420 3 230 3 110 4 Middle Atlantic 1,558 11 811 11 409 14 East North Central 2,688 20 1,466 20 619 21 West North Central 1,661 12 942 13 342 12 South Atlantic 1,870 14 903 13 346 12 East South Central 1,531 11 727 10 142 5 West South Central 1,909 14 927 13 385 13 Mountain 1,043 8 635 9 300 10 Pacific 996 7 537 7 288 10 Map 2. Range Use in Preparation for Hunting in 2011 (Percent of all range users by Census Division) WA OR ID Mountain 10% MT WY ND SD West North Central 12% MN WI East North Central 21% MI NY VT NH CT ME MA RI New England 4% Pacific 10% CA NV UT CO NE KS IA MO IL IN KY OH WV PA VA NJ DE MD Middle Atlantic 14% AZ NM TX OK AR LA MS TN AL GA SC NC South Atlantic 12% AK HI West South Central 13% East South Central 5% FL 6 Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

1975, 1991, and 2011 Trends To put the activity in historical context, the number of all hunters has been roughly constant over the years of this study: 14.3 million in 1975, 14.1 million in 1991, and 13.7 million in 2011. These estimates fall within 2011 s 95% confidence interval, so there is no statistically significant difference in the amount of hunting participation for those three years. Of those hunters, 9 million target shot in 1975, 7.7 million in 1991, and 7.2 million in 2011. Table 5. Comparison of target shooting by hunters in 1975, 1991, and 2011 (16 years old and older. Numbers in thousands) 1975 1991 2011 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total hunters 14,282 100 14,063 100 13,674 100 Target shot in preparation for hunting 8,998 63 7,731 55 7,178 52 Used shooting range (NA) (NA) 3,258 23 2,943 22 (NA) Not available. Graph 4. Hunting Preparation by Target Shooting at Shooting Ranges 16,000 Number of participants (in thousands) 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 1975 1991 2011 Total hunters Target shot in preparation for hunting Used shooting ranges Note: Shooting range data not available for 1975. Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011 7

The demographics of target shooters closely matches the demographics of all hunters in every measured category. See the 2011 FHWAR National Report at http://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/ fhw11-nat.pdf for more detail on overall hunter demographics. The profile of the 2011 target shooter who hunted was 45 years old and older, rural, male, above median income, white, and Midwestern. Table 6. Demographics of target shooters: 2011 (16 years old and older. Numbers in thousands) Target shooting in preparation for hunting Number Percent Total 7,178 100 Age group 16 17 282 4 18 24 672 9 25 34 1,006 14 35 44 1,299 18 45 54 1,732 24 55 64 1,586 22 65 and older 601 8 Urban/rural Urban 3,054 43 Rural 4,124 57 Gender Male 6,443 90 Female 736 10 Income Under $10,000 195 3 $10,000 to $19,999 448 6 $20,000 to $24,999 183 3 $25,000 to $29,999 238 3 $30,000 to $49,999 1,269 18 $50,000 to $74,999 1,654 23 $75,000 or more 3,190 44 Census Division New England 230 3 Middle Atlantic 811 11 East North Central 1,466 20 West North Central 942 13 South Atlantic 903 13 East South Central 727 10 West South Central 927 13 Mountain 635 9 Pacific 537 7 Race White 6,857 96 Black American Indian, Aleut, or Eskimo 93* 1* Asian or Pacific Islander Other 49* 1* Sample size less than 10. *Sample size less than 30 and more than 9. 8 Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

Range users did not follow the dominant hunting profile as closely as other target shooters did. Range users were more likely to be older and male. A major distinction of range users is that while target shooters in general were more likely to be rural, range users were more likely to be urban. Table 7. Demographic of range users who were preparing for hunting: 2011 (16 years old and older. Numbers in thousands) Used shooting ranges Number Percent Total 2,943 100 Age group 16 17 130* 4* 18 24 154 5 25 34 341 12 35 44 538 18 45 54 753 26 55 64 733 25 65 and older 294 10 Urban/rural Urban 1,699 58 Rural 1,244 42 Gender Male 2,727 93 Female 216 7 Income Under $10,000 $10,000 to $19,999 174* 6* $20,000 to $24,999 144* 5* $25,000 to $29,999 $30,000 to $49,999 400 14 $50,000 to $74,999 457 16 $75,000 or more 1,703 58 Census Division New England 110 4 Middle Atlantic 409 14 East North Central 619 21 West North Central 342 12 South Atlantic 346 12 East South Central 142* 5* West South Central 385* 13* Mountain 315 11 Pacific 273 9 Race White 2,744 93 Black American Indian, Aleut, or Eskimo 25* 1* Asian or Pacific Islander Other Sample size less than 10. *Sample size less than 30 and more than 9. Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011 9

The proportion of total hunters who target shot has fallen from nearly twothirds in 1975 (63%, to be exact) to approximately half in 2011 (52%). What stands out is the drop-off in the number of younger adults who target shot. The median age of target shooters was 30 in 1975, 34 in 1991, and 46 in 2011. The age cohort with the biggest increase in the percent of target shooters was the 55 64 year olds. The age cohort with the biggest decrease was the 25 34 year olds. Also, the decrease in below median income target shooters from 1991 to 2011 is notable. In 1991 41% of target shooters had below median household income; in 2011 33% had below median income. This reflects the distribution of overall hunter income, where in 1991 43% were below median income, and in 2011 38% had below median income. The number of lower income people who target shot has dropped 26% in the twenty years from 1991 to 2011. Table 8. Demographic Trends in Target Shooting by Hunters: 1975, 1991, and 2011 (16 years old and older. Numbers in thousands) 1975 1991 2011 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total 8,998 100 7,731 100 7,178 100 Age group 16 17 540 6 357 5 282 4 18 24 2,250 25 1,164 15 672 9 25 34 2,879 32 2,334 30 1,006 14 35 44 1,440 16 1,931 25 1,299 18 45 54 1,080 12 1,078 14 1,732 24 55 64 540 6 556 7 1,586 22 65 and older 270 3 311 4 601 8 Urban/rural Urban (NA) (NA) 3,461 45 3,054 43 Rural (NA) (NA) 4,270 55 4,124 57 Gender Male (NA) (NA) 7,209 93 6,443 90 Female (NA) (NA) 522 7 736 10 Income Below median (NA) (NA) 3,169 41 2,333 33 Above median (NA) (NA) 4,561 59 4,844 67 Census Division Total (NA) (NA) 7,731 100 7,178 100 New England (NA) (NA) 275 4 230 3 Middle Atlantic (NA) (NA) 1,179 15 811 11 East North Central (NA) (NA) 1,605 21 1,466 20 West North Central (NA) (NA) 940 12 942 13 South Atlantic (NA) (NA) 1,034 13 903 13 East South Central (NA) (NA) 588 8 727 10 West South Central (NA) (NA) 810 10 927 13 Mountain (NA) (NA) 672 9 635 9 Pacific (NA) (NA) 628 8 537 7 Race White (NA) (NA) 7,562 98 6,857 96 Black (NA) (NA) American Indian, Aleut, (NA) (NA) 93* 1* or Eskimo Asian or Pacific (NA) (NA) Islander Other (NA) (NA) 49* 1* (NA) Not available. Sample size less than 10. *Sample size less than 30 and more than 9. 10 Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

Graph 5. Target Shooting by Age Group 3,500 Number of participants (in thousands) 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 1975 1991 2011 16 17 18 24 25 34 35 44 45 54 55 64 65 and older Chart 1. 1991 Target Shooters by Residence Chart 2. 2011 Target Shooters by Residence 55% 45% Urban Rural 57% 43% Urban Rural Chart 3. 1991 Target Shooters by Gender Chart 4. 2011 Target Shooters by Gender 7% 10% Male Male 93% Female 90% Female Chart 5. 1991 Target Shooters by Income Chart 6. 2011 Target Shooters by Income 59% 41% Below median Above median 67% 33% Below median Above median Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011 11

In 1991 3.3 million hunters, 23% of all hunters, used shooting ranges. In 2011 2.9 million, 22% of all hunters, used them. Of all target shooters who hunted, 42% used shooting ranges in both 1991 and 2011. As in overall target shooting, there was a change by age cohort in shooting range usage. In 1991 the biggest age cohort was 25 34 year olds (31% of all users), while in 2011 the biggest cohort was 45 54 year olds (26%). It is interesting to recognize that the 25 34 year olds of 1991 were the 45 54 years olds of 2011. This is the Baby Boomer bump as it progressed through the years. Table 9. Demographic Trends in Range Use by Hunters: 1975, 1991, and 2011 (16 years old and older. Numbers in thousands) 1991 2011 Number Percent Number Percent Total 3,258 100 2,943 100 Age group 16 17 123 4 130* 4* 18 24 510 16 154 5 25 34 1,005 31 341 12 35 44 822 25 538 18 45 54 486 15 753 26 55 64 215 7 733 25 65 and older 96 3 294 10 Census Division New England 132 4 110 4 Middle Atlantic 576 18 409 14 East North Central 667 20 619 21 West North Central 321 10 342 12 South Atlantic 413 13 346 12 East South Central 148 5 142 5 West South Central 353 11 385 13 Mountain 323 10 315 11 Pacific 325 10 273 9 Urban/rural Urban 2,234 69 1,699 58 Rural 1,015 31 1,244 42 Gender Male 3,075 94 2,727 93 Female 184 6 216 7 Income Below median 1,058 32 783 27 Above median 2,199 68 2,160 73 Race White 3,171 97 2,744 93 Black 42 1 American Indian, Aleut, 21 1 25* 1* or Eskimo Asian or Pacific Islander Other Sample size less than 10. *Sample size less than 30 and more than 9. 12 Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

Graph 6. Shooting Range Use by Age Group 2,500 Number of participants (in thousands) 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 1991 16 17 18 24 25 34 35 44 45 54 55 64 65 and older 2011 Chart 7. 1991 Range Users by Residence Chart 8. 2011 Range Users by Residence 31% 69% Urban Rural 42% 58% Urban Rural Chart 9. 1991 Range Users by Gender Chart 10. 2011 Range Users by Gender 6% 7% Male Male 94% Female 93% Female Chart 11. 1991 Range Users by Income Chart 12. 2011 Range Users by Income 32% Below median 27% Below median 68% Above median 73% Above median Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011 13

The states with the most resident hunters who target shot were Texas, Wisconsin, New York, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Minnesota. The states with the most resident hunters who used shooting ranges were Wisconsin, New York, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, California, and Ohio. The estimate for resident Texas range users was based on a sample size too small to be reported. Table 10. Target Shooting and Range Use in Preparation for Hunting, by State of Residence: 2011 (16 years old and older. Numbers in thousands) State of Residence Target shooters Number Range users Number Alabama 107* Alaska 58 32* Arizona 168* 75* Arkansas 172* 81* California 190 107* Colorado 119 73* Connecticut 32* Delaware 8* Florida 147* 71* Georgia 145* Hawaii Idaho 56* Illinois 261 Indiana 137* Iowa 131 72* Kansas 101 28* Kentucky 222* Louisiana 94* Maine 71 20* Maryland 48* 36* Massachusetts 50* 37* Michigan 329 99* Minnesota 316 131* Mississippi 186* Missouri 269 76* Montana 79 29* Nebraska 52 19* Nevada 31* 15* New Hampshire 19* New Jersey 65* 32* New Mexico 43* 18* New York 382 234* North Carolina 178 North Dakota (NA) (NA) Ohio 273* 107* Oklahoma 102* Oregon 103* Pennsylvania 365 143* Rhode Island 7* 6* South Carolina 82* South Dakota 60* Tennessee 213* Texas 558* Utah 112 61* Vermont 50 23* Virginia 176 77* Washington 148 85* West Virginia 119 45* Wisconsin 467 333* Wyoming 58 29* (NA) Not available. Sample size less than 10. *Sample size less than 30 and more than 9. 14 Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

Summary Along with scouting hunting areas and acquiring equipment, target shooting is a common activity for people preparing to hunt. Half of all hunters target practiced in 2011, and a fifth of all hunters used a shooting range. Hunters anywhere in the country have the same propensity to target shoot, but range use varies. Westerners were three times more likely to go to a shooting range than southerners from Kentucky down to Mississippi. There has been a decrease in the number of hunters who target shot since 1975, from 9 million to 7.2 million. Hunters who target shoot and their subgroup range users followed the demographic profile of all hunters in many categories, except for one interesting difference. Range users were more likely to live in urban areas, unlike hunters in general and those who target shoot specifically. The FHWAR Survey gives us an indepth picture of the hunting activity of Americans throughout the survey year. Seeing how many hunters target shoot and use ranges illustrates the extent of their commitment as they ready themselves for the hunting season. Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011 15

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service June 2014 Cover photo: USFWS