DIRECTION DEPENDENCY OF OFFSHORE TURBULENCE INTENSITY IN THE GERMAN BIGHT

Similar documents
2. Fachtagung Energiemeteorologie 2011, Bremerhaven SITE ASSESSMENT. WIND TURBINE ASSESSMENT. GRID INTEGRATION. DUE DILIGENCE. KNOWLEDGE.

FINO1 Mast Correction

10 years of meteorological measurements at FINO1

FIVE YEARS OF OPERATION OF THE FIRST OFFSHORE WIND RESEARCH PLATFORM IN THE GERMAN BIGHT FINO1

Results and conclusions of a floating Lidar offshore test

Report on the Research Project OWID Offshore Wind Design Parameter

Tidal influence on offshore and coastal wind resource predictions at North Sea. Barbara Jimenez 1,2, Bernhard Lange 3, and Detlev Heinemann 1.

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

Analysis of the Turbulence Intensity at Skipheia Measurement Station

IMPROVEMENT OF THE WIND FARM MODEL FLAP FOR OFFSHORE APPLICATIONS

Atmospheric Impacts on Power Curves of Multi- Megawatt Offshore Wind Turbines

FLUXES ESTIMATION AND THE DERIVATION OF THE ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY AT THE OFFSHORE MAST FINO1.

3D Turbulence at the Offshore Wind Farm Egmond aan Zee J.W. Wagenaar P.J. Eecen

Stefan Emeis

A Study of the Normal Turbulence Model in IEC

E. Agu, M. Kasperski Ruhr-University Bochum Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Sciences

Assessing the quality of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) wind retrieval in coastal zones using multiple Lidars

Wind Data Verification Report Arriga 50m

On- and Offshore Assessment of the ZephIR Wind-LiDAR

Comparison of flow models

Modelling of Wind Turbine Loads nearby a Wind Farm

Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar

Why does T7 underperform? Individual turbine performance relative to preconstruction estimates.

Offshore Micrositing - Meeting The Challenge

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

Wake effects at Horns Rev and their influence on energy production. Kraftværksvej 53 Frederiksborgvej 399. Ph.: Ph.

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

WIND ENERGY REPORT GERMANY 2013

Executive Summary of Accuracy for WINDCUBE 200S

Observed Roughness Lengths for Momentum and Temperature on a Melting Glacier Surface

Validation of long-range scanning lidars deployed around the Høvsøre Test Station

Validation Study of the Lufft Ventus Wind Sensor

Real Life Turbulence and Model Simplifications. Jørgen Højstrup Wind Solutions/Højstrup Wind Energy VindKraftNet 28 May 2015

VALIDATION OF WIND SPEED DISTURBANCES TO CUPS AT THE METEORLOCICAL MAST ON THE OFFSHORE PLATFORM FINO1 USING WIND-LIDAR MEASUREMENTS.

7 YEARS METEOMAST AMRUMBANK WEST

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

Study on wind turbine arrangement for offshore wind farms

Coherence of turbulent wind at FINO1

Monitoring Cruise Report

Conditions for Offshore Wind Energy Use

Statistical Analysis of PGA Tour Skill Rankings USGA Research and Test Center June 1, 2007

Draft Kivalina Wind Resource Report

The effects of atmospheric stability on coastal wind climates

Importance of thermal effects and sea surface roughness for offshore wind resource assessment

Wave climate in the Baltic Sea 2014

The NORCOWE legacy - data and instrumentation

Development of Sea Surface Temperature (SST) in the Baltic Sea 2012

Analysis and Verification of Wind Data from Ground-based LiDAR

Dynamic Network Behavior of Offshore Wind Parks

Wave climate in the Baltic Sea 2010

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

Increased Project Bankability : Thailand's First Ground-Based LiDAR Wind Measurement Campaign

The Seventh International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Applications (BBAA7) Shanghai, China; September 2-6, 2012 Wind tunnel measurements

ESTIMATING WIND ENERGY POTENTIAL OFFSHORE IN MEDITERRANEAN AREAS.

First studies with the high-resolution coupled wave current model CWAM and other aspects of the project Sea State Monitor

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report

WaMoS II Wave Monitoring System

National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Wind Resource Data Summary Guam Naval Ordnance Annex Data Summary and Retrieval for November 2009

The Wind Observation on the Pacific Ocean for Offshore Wind Farm

Chapter 10, Part 1. Scales of Motion. Examples of Wind at Different Scales. Small Scale Winds

SUMMARY OF THE EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF COLD HELIUM PROPAGATION ALONG A SCALE MODEL OF THE LHC TUNNEL

Effect of airflow direction on human perception of draught

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report for Kodiak Electric Association

ValidatingWindProfileEquationsduringTropicalStormDebbyin2012

What s UP in the. Pacific Ocean? Learning Objectives

SEA-LEVEL AND SEA-STATE MEASUREMENTS WITH RADAR LEVEL SENSORS. Dr. Ulrich Barjenbruch 1 and Jens Wilhelmi 2

3D Nacelle Mounted Lidar in Complex Terrain

Modelling atmospheric stability with CFD: The importance of tall profiles

The OWEZ Meteorological Mast

New IEC and Site Conditions in Reality

Atmospheric Rossby Waves in Fall 2011: Analysis of Zonal Wind Speed and 500hPa Heights in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE FLOW BEHAVIOUR IN A MODERN TRAFFIC TUNNEL IN CASE OF FIRE INCIDENT

COASTAL PROTECTION AGAINST WIND-WAVE INDUCED EROSION USING SOFT AND POROUS STRUCTURES: A CASE STUDY AT LAKE BIEL, SWITZERLAND

WAKE MODELING OF AN OFFSHORE WINDFARM USING OPENFOAM

Valerijs Bezrukovs, Vladislavs Bezrukovs Ventspils University College Latvia. WREF2012 Denver, CO May 13-17, 2012

Wake measurements from the Horns Rev wind farm

TEMPERATURE BEHAVIOR during WINTER in ANTARCTICA

Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared by: Mia Devine

Buckland Wind Resource Report

NORCOWE met-ocean measurement campaigns

An analysis of offshore wind farm SCADA measurements to identify key parameters influencing the magnitude of wake effects

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

Department of Meteorology. An Analysis of Sea Breezes on the South Coast of England and Evidence of Pre- and Post-Frontal Waves at the Surface.

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

Monitoring Cruise Report

STUDY OF LOCAL WINDS IN MOUNTAINOUS COASTAL AREAS BY MULTI- SENSOR SATELLITE DATA

Row / Distance from centerline, m. Fan side Distance behind spreader, m 0.5. Reference point. Center line

Appendix E Mangaone Stream at Ratanui Hydrological Gauging Station Influence of IPO on Stream Flow

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

Correlation analysis between UK onshore and offshore wind speeds

Full Classification acc. to IEC for SoDAR AQ510 Wind Finder. Vincent Camier, Managing Director, Ammonit Measurement GmbH

THE :1;TUDY OF :HZ- SEA S -: 4 -.,1E D Ti=k COLLCTEZ FROM OF BENGAL DURI:1'

July Interim Report. National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE) Wind Resource Assessment & Offshore Unit Chennai, India.

Modelling of offshore wind turbine wakes with the wind farm program FLaP

Atomspheric Waves at the 500hPa Level

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

Wind Regimes 1. 1 Wind Regimes

Appendix E Cat Island Borrow Area Analysis

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report

Transcription:

10 th Wind Energy Conference DEWEK 2010 DIRECTION DEPENDENCY OF OFFSHORE TURBULENCE INTENSITY IN THE GERMAN BIGHT Annette Westerhellweg, Beatriz Canadillas, Thomas Neumann DEWI GmbH, Wilhelmshaven, Germany, a.westerhellweg@ dewi.de Summary This contribution concentrates on the assessment of the direction dependency of turbulence intensity in the German Bight. Turbulence intensity (TI) has been assessed on a 10 minutes basis as ratio between standard deviation of wind speed and the wind speed. Data of the two research platforms in the German Bight FINO1 and FINO3 have been evaluated. At the location of FINO1 a variation of TI dependent on the wind direction was observed with higher turbulence intensity from north wind directions. The FINO3 data now after completion of the 1 st operational year does not show such a distinct direction dependency. The comparison of the turbulence intensity at FINO1 and FINO3 shows differences for eastern and southern wind directions but high agreement for the main wind directions. The wave height and the atmospheric stability are the main factors for the turbulence intensity at far offshore locations like FINO1 or FINO3. The direction dependency of turbulence intensity at FINO1 correlates with the direction dependency of wave heights. 1. Introduction At FINO1 the turbulence intensity varies with the direction with higher turbulence intensities from north wind directions (about 7%) and lowest turbulence intensities from east directions (less than 5%). This study assesses the reasons for this dependency and evaluates whether the turbulence distribution at FINO1 is valid all over the German Bight, i.e. whether FINO3 shows the same behavior. For comparison purposes also the turbulence intensity of the FINO2 platform located in the Baltic Sea has been investigated. In previous reports the dependency of turbulence on the fetch over open water has been studied. However, most of them have been carried out on near shore masts. In [1] the dependence of turbulence intensity on the fetch (free path length of wind over open sea) was analyzed for offshore sites near the Danish coast giving the result that in general in a range of 0 15km (and under stable conditions up to 40km) onshore conditions play a role. In this distance the higher turbulence from onshore is still visible and therefore the turbulence intensity decreases with the distance to the shore. In larger distances the opposite effect is visible. All FINO platforms have a distance to shore greater than 38 km. At FINO1 (located in 45km distance to the island Borkum) directions with the longest fetch (North and West) show higher turbulence intensity correlated to higher wave heights at these wind directions. Offshore like onshore the turbulence intensity is higher at low wind speeds and decreases with wind speed up to a minimum of approximately 11 m/s. But opposite to onshore from this minimum the turbulence intensity again increases towards higher wind speeds due to an enlarged surface roughness. For the offshore platforms FINO1 3 [3] wind measurements are available for a period of 1 7 years, which gives the chance to investigate the interrelationships of the turbulence intensity to the different factors like wind direction, wind speed, fetch, wave heights and atmospheric stability. In the assessment of turbulence intensities always data of whole climatic periods of full years should be evaluated to avoid misinterpretation due to seasonal effects. 2. Data Base The following 10 minutes data sets of the FINO research platforms have been evaluated. Figure 1: FINO1: 5 years, 2004 2008, 91.5m LAT, mast correction of wind speed, standard deviation of wind speed: in the direct mast shadow the sigma of the top anemometer at 103m LAT was applied. FINO3: 1 year, Nov2009 Oct2010, 90m LAT, combined from 3 anemometers at one height. FINO2 (for comparison): 3 years, Aug2007 Jul2010, 102m, top anemometer. Locations of the FINO research platforms

3. Dependency on Wind Direction FINO1 shows significant differences of the turbulence intensity for different wind directions whereas at the position of FINO3 a much more homogeneous picture is seen. Additionally the turbulence intensity distribution in the Baltic Sea measured at FINO2 is depicted. 4. Dependency on Wind Speed The turbulence intensity has a minimum at appr. 11m/s and increases for higher wind speeds at both locations. At FINO3 the increase is homogenous for all wind directions whereas at FINO1 large differences for different wind directions are visible. FINO1 FINO3 FINO2 Figure 2: direction at FINO platforms. Figure 3: speed for the different wind directions at FINO platforms. 2/5

5. Comparison for different wind speeds For moderate wind speeds (8 10m/s) the turbulence intensity is approximately the same for both FINO platforms for western directions but is lower at FINO1 for eastern wind directions (top figure). For high wind speeds (16 18m/s) the differences for eastern wind directions are even higher. For FINO3 one wind direction sector (30 ) is missing in the graph because of a lack of data (lower figure). 8 10m/s 7. Comparison for different wind directions For the main wind direction section at FINO1 (225 255 ) the turbulence intensity shows high agreement at both FINO platforms (top figure). For south eastern wind directions there are distinct differences (lower figure). 225 255 16 18m/s 105 135 Figure 4: direction at FINO1 and FINO3 for medium and high wind speeds. Figure 5: speed for the SW and NE wind directions at FINO1 and FINO3. 6. Dependency on wave height Under offshore conditions, there is an increase of turbulence intensity for high wind speeds due to an enlarged surface roughness. The turbulence intensity correlates with the wave height, as an example FINO3 turbulence data is plotted over the significant wave height for high wind speeds in Figure 6 Figure 6: Turbulence intensity versus significant wave height at FINO3 for high wind speeds. 3/5

At FINO1 the wave height data show a similar direction dependency like the turbulence intensity with highest wave heights at northern wind directions. This direction dependency is visible at moderate wind speeds (8 10m/s) and even stronger at high wind speeds (14 20m/s). In the eastern wind directions the wave heights remain low for high wind speeds (Figure 8). This seems to be a distinctive feature of FINO1. The assessment of the wave heights at FINO3 suffers from the lack of data, only 7 months have been evaluated (2010 02 25 2010 09 29). However with the evaluated data base the wave heights are in the same range as at FINO1 for moderate wind speed, for high wind speeds the data base is too small for a final appraisal of results. 8 10 m/s 14 20 m/s Figure 7: Fino1 for moderate wind speeds (above) and high wind speeds (below), all data. Figure 9: Fino3 for moderate wind speeds (above) and high wind speeds (below), all data. Figure 8: FINO1 for moderate wind speeds and high wind speeds, bin averages. Figure 10: FINO3 for moderate wind speeds and high wind speeds, bin averages. For high wind speeds the data base is too small for a final appraisal of results. 4/5

Figure 11: Turbulence intensity for wind speed bin [7.5;8.5m/s] versus the wind direction at FINO1 for the 2 nd and 4 th quarter measured over a period of 5 years. Figure 12: Turbulence intensity for wind speed bin [8;12m/s] versus the wind direction at FINO3 for the 2 nd and 4 th quarter measured over a period of 1 year. 8. Seasonal dependency The offshore turbulence intensity strongly depends on the atmospheric stability. In autumn the air is colder compared to the warm water leading to an instable surface layer with higher turbulence. Opposite to this in spring stable conditions are connected to lower turbulence intensities. Figure 11 and Figure 12 show the turbulence intensity for the 2 nd and the 4 th quarter compared to the whole data set. Because wind speed distribution differs between different seasons only the TI of a small wind speed bin is depicted. At both FINO platforms a distinct sensitivity of the TI on the season is visible. 9. Conclusions Turbulence data of two research platforms in the German Bight, FINO1 and FINO3 have been evaluated for dependencies on wind speed, wind direction, wave height and atmospheric stability based on a 5 years and a 1 year measurement, respectively. It is shown that FINO3 shows a different directional behavior compared to FINO1. Whereas FINO1 shows higher turbulence intensity at northern wind directions and lowest TI values when the wind comes from eastern directions, FINO3 shows a more homogeneous behavior for the directional dependency. While for eastern and southern wind directions this different behavior can be seen, for the main wind directions, South West to North West, the comparison shows a high agreement. The wave height and the atmospheric stability are the main factors for the turbulence intensity range at far offshore locations like FINO1 or FINO3. For eastern and southern wind directions the wave heights are particular low at FINO1 leading to a low TI. The direction dependency for the wave heights could also observed for FINO3, but on a much smaller level, which is in agreement with the more homogeneous TI for different directions. As the wave height data for FINO3 did not comprise a full year this should be assessed for FINO3 in more detail as soon as a full year wave height data will be available. The seasonal dependence for a specific wind speed range shows the influence of the atmospheric stability on the generation of TI. 10. Acknowledgements The data evaluated here is from the FINO Project [3]. The FINO project is funded by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU). 11. References [1] Barthelmie R. J.: Monitoring Offshore Wind and Turbulence Characteristics in Denmark, Proceedings of the BWEA Wind Energy Conference 1999. [2] M. Türk, S. Emeis: The dependence of offshore turbulence intensity on wind speed, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 98 (2010) 466 471, 2010. [3] FINO: Forschungsplattformen in Nord und Ostsee, www.fino offshore.de. 5/5