APPENDIX A Urban Control Zone Corridor Study Reports

Similar documents
APPENDIX D Draft Chapter 10 for AASHTO Roadside Design Guide

Typical Cross Section: DOWNTOWN (Observer Highway - 8th Street)

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

SECTION 14: LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

Driveway Design Criteria

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

AGENDA REPORT. Issue: Discussion of potential improvements on Barnwell Road at Niblick Drive

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

Table of Contents. Introduction. Prompt List Arterials and Streets. Prompt List Interchange. Prompt List Intersections. Prompt List Limited Access

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Geometric Design Tables

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

700 Multi-Modal Considerations

Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

Poor pavement condition Substandard Intersections. / Substandard bike/pedestrian/transit accommodations. Driveway access Environmental concerns

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

Policy Statement. Objective. Context. References and Supporting Documentation

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Figure 4-10: Pedestrian Improvements Types of Potential Station Area Improvements - Place-Making Improvements

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

AGENDA ITEM 6 D THOMASVILLE ROAD (HERMITAGE BOULEVARD TO LIVE OAK PLANTATION ROAD) ROADWAY SAFETY AUDIT

Roadway Design Manual

Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Toolbox (Excerpt from Figure 3.1)

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

General Design Factors

Roadside Safety Proven Countermeasures. Emmett McDevitt Transportation Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

Blair/Williamson Intersection Expressed Needs

DRAFT. A fifth objective, other considerations, has been added to capture considerations not captured by the four primary objectives.

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Chapter 5 DATA COLLECTION FOR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY STUDIES

How Might Connected Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles Influence Geometric Design? October 10, 2017

GDOT Cross Section Elements. Course ID: GDOT PDH Credits

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study

Shared Use Path Design

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

Off-road Trails. Guidance

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

DRAFT. Scholls Ferry Road Conceptual Design Plan Technical Memorandum Multi-Modal Examples. Multnomah County 1600 SE 190th Avenue Portland, OR 97233

Vermont Permit Test Flash Cards

Chapter 5 Shared-Use Paths

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Route 28 (South Orleans Road)/Route 39 (Harwich Road)/Quanset Road Intersection

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

Chapter 6: Along the Street

3-13 UFC - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN FOR ROADS, STREETS, WALKS, AND OPEN

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor

Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

DRAFT Sellwood Bridge Existing Roadway Deficiencies

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Bluffdale/ UDOT South High-T Intersection Project Type Operations

section 4 Existing Conditions, Issues, and Options

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

CSAH 101 Preliminary Design

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Road Safety Audit training course. Motorways - safety issues of the motorway design

PART A: IDENTIFICATION/LOCATION

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

ADJUSTING TO, FOLLOWING, AND MEETING URBAN TRAFFIC

Classification Criteria

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Best Practices for the Design and Operation of Reduced Conflict Intersections

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Board of Supervisors February 27, 2017

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. WAY

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

GENERAL. 1. Description

Project Goal and Description. Why Broadway? Broadway SFMTA.COM/BROADWAY. The goal of the Broadway Safety Improvement

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

Road Safety Audit Report: Interstate 516

Design of Suburban Highways

H8 Signs, Supports and Poles

Multi-Modal Traffic Analysis. Parisi and Associates

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (13-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Brooklyn Boulevard (County Road 152) Reconstruction Project Phase I. OPEN HOUSE June 20, 2017

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

Transcription:

APPENDIX A Urban Control Zone Corridor Study Reports California Sites Table A-1. California Study Corridors California Study Corridor County Name Length (miles) State Highway 1 Orange 7.0 State Highway 39 Orange 18.2 State Highway 74 Orange 2.0 State Highway 75 San Diego 3.3 State Highway 76 San Diego 7.0 State Highway 78 San Diego 4.0 State Highway 90 Orange 5.0 Total: 46.5 UCZ-CA-1: State Highway 1 (Pacific Coast Highway), Orange County, California Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with a median or TWLTL for most of the study corridor, On-street parking periodically provided, Bicycle lane in portion of corridor (not continuous occurs in several short segment locations), Land use is commercial, Road horizontal geometry generally straight, Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit ranges from 35 to 50 mph, Bus stops located far-side, Sidewalk is curb-attached, Utility poles located within 2 to 3 ft of curb face, and Corridor includes street furniture (benches, trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Frequent roadside crashes at lane merges (acceleration lanes beyond intersections) and with objects located within approximately 2 ft laterally, Far-side bus bays with driveways source of crashes, Small segmented island with signal head in island, and Several locations where driveways have street furniture, poles, and trees located immediately beyond the far-side of the driveway (in direction of travel). 1

Figure A1. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 1 -- Map 1 2

Figure A2. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 1 -- Map 2 3

Table A-2. Crash Type Summary, State Highway 1, Orange County, CA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 63 61 63 51 53 66 357 Head-On 0 4 8 8 7 5 32 Hit Object 36 26 23 39 29 44 197 Pedestrian 6 5 3 1 2 5 22 Rear End 179 171 162 162 134 120 928 Sideswipe 51 52 42 51 49 42 287 Others (Total) Overturned 5 4 4 6 6 5 30 Undefined Others 30 26 7 10 11 17 101 Total Crashes 370 349 312 328 291 304 1954 Table A-3. Crash Severity Summary, State Highway 1, Orange County, CA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 236 (30) 210 (24) 166 (13) 188 (28) 161 (23) 158 (35) 1119 (153) Injury (Total) Possible Injury 95 (3) 82 (0) 93 (2) 83 (0) 71 (2) 88 (1) 512 (8) Non-Incapacitating 32 (2) 46 (2) 43 (7) 44 (6) 48 (2) 47 (6) 260 (25) Incapacitating 6 (1) 11 (0) 10 (1) 12 (4) 11 (2) 8 (1) 58 (9) Fatal 1 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1) 0 (0) 3 (1) 5 (2) Total Crashes 370 (36) 349 (26) 312 (23) 328 (39) 291 (29) 304 (44) 1954 (197) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) 4

UCZ-CA-2: State Highway 39, Orange County, California Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with a transition to 3 through-lanes per direction briefly. At the location with two lanes per direction there is also a wide right should for most of the segment that develops into right turn lanes as needed for the numerous driveways along this corridor, On-street parking periodically provided but most of the longer cluster-crash regions were at high speed locations where parking was prohibited, No exclusive bicycle facilities, Curb and gutter present for corridor length, Land use is commercial with a little residential (mostly multi-family) mixed n, Road horizontal geometry generally straight, Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit ranges from 35 to 50 mph, Bus stops located far-side, Sidewalk ranges from curb-attached to buffer separated, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located within 2 to 3 ft of curb face for a large portion of the corridor, and Corridor includes street furniture (benches, trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Several locations where driveways or intersections have street furniture, poles, and trees located immediately beyond the far side of the driveway (in direction of travel), Several mid-block corridor locations with trees, utility poles, and street light poles located inches from the curb, It is worth noting that the poles placed in close proximity to the curb shifted to the opposing side of the road in the middle of the corridor and a clear shift in roadside crashes to that direction of travel is visible. 5

Figure A-3. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 39 -- Map 1 6

Figure A-4. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 39 -- Map 2 7

Figure A-5. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 39 -- Map 3 8

Figure A-6. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 39 -- Map 4 9

Table A-4. Crash Type Summary, State Highway 39, Orange County, CA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 215 234 245 261 264 259 1,478 Head-On 16 17 23 30 25 23 134 Hit Object 70 76 45 59 57 64 371 Pedestrian 25 34 25 28 35 31 178 Rear End 598 551 485 609 614 563 3,420 Sideswipe 146 148 156 199 201 200 1,050 Others (Total) Overturned 4 6 4 8 4 6 32 Undefined Others 54 54 27 32 26 40 233 Total Crashes 1,128 1,120 1,010 1,226 1,226 1,186 6,896 Table A-5. Crash Severity Summary, State Highway 39, Orange County, CA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 599(50) 587(60) 548(34) 701(46) 702(40) 675(47) 3812(277) Injury (Total) Possible Injury 388(5) 407(10) 343(0) 387(4) 382(7) 356(6) 2263(32) Non-Incapacitating 122(13) 107(6) 101(9) 118(6) 118(9) 136(9) 702(52) Incapacitating 15(2) 11(0) 8(1) 15(2) 17(1) 12(2) 78(8) Fatal 4(0) 8(0) 10(1) 5(1) 7(0) 7(0) 41(2) Total Crashes 1128(70) 1120(76) 1010(45) 1226(59) 1226(57) 1186(64) 6896(371) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) 10

UCZ-CA-3: State Highway 74, Orange County, California Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with turn lanes (as needed) on west end (milepoint 0.1 to 1.2) transitioning to one through-lanes in each direction with turn lanes (as needed) on east end (milepoint 1.2 to 1.6), No on-street parking, No dedicated bicycle lanes, Land use is primarily residential very few driveways (most located on minor roads that intersect SH 74), Road horizontal geometry generally straight, Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit ranges from 40 to 45 mph, No apparent bus stops on corridor, Sidewalk has a serpentine configuration with a landscape buffer ranging from 0 ft to approximately 8 ft, Street trees located along sidewalk (often on both sides), Utility poles located near road adjacent to uneven terrain only on the extreme east end of project. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Crashes occurred where trees were located within 4 ft of the curb face on the outside of horizontal curves but similar tree placement at tangent locations did not result in similar crashes, Uneven roadside terrain with no curb and gutter and with utility poles located 10 ft to 12 ft from road at east end (north side) only, The most frequently hit objects along this corridor were curb, trees, and traffic signs followed by signal and utility poles, walls, fences, and other unidentified objects. 11

Figure A-7. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 74 -- Map 12

Table A-6. Crash Type Summary, State Highway 74, Orange County, CA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 4 5 6 11 9 9 44 Head-On 1 2 0 0 0 1 4 Hit Object 3 3 2 4 0 2 14 Pedestrian 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 Rear End 10 11 3 12 8 6 50 Sideswipe 10 5 5 10 8 4 42 Others (Total) Overturned 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Undefined Others 4 2 0 0 2 0 8 Total Crashes 32 28 17 39 27 22 165 Table A-7. Crash Severity Summary, State Highway 74, Orange County, CA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 22(0) 25(3) 13(2) 21(3) 18(0) 17(1) 116(9) Injury (Total) Possible Injury 6(0) 2(0) 2(0) 15(1) 5(0) 2(0) 32(1) Non-Incapacitating 3(2) 1(0) 2(0) 3(0) 4(0) 2(0) 15(2) Incapacitating 1(1) 0 0 0 0 1(1) 2(2) Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Crashes 32(3) 28(3) 17(2) 39(4) 27(0) 22(2) 165(14) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) 13

UCZ-CA-4: State Highway Route 75, San Diego County, California Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with a median for length of corridor (median on north end heavily landscaped with palm trees and other ornamental landscaping), On-street parking periodically provided along north end, No bicycle lane, Land use is commercial, tourism, & military, Road horizontal geometry generally straight on south end with sharper horizontal curvature on north end, Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit ranges from 25 to 55 mph, Bus stops located in wide striped shoulder region on east side of road, Sidewalk with landscape buffer on north end, shared use facility toward south end, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located within 2 to 6 ft of curb face, and Corridor includes street furniture (benches, trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Median palm trees 4 to 6 ft from back of curb were visibly scarred from being impacted by vehicles. The locations where the palm trees were set back further did not encounter this problem. The specific location with the palm trees closer to the road also had the most extreme horizontal curvature along the corridor. At the south end of the corridor there was a wide shoulder, higher speed limit, and a narrow island (approximately 6 ft wide), with a shared use facility on the far side. This region experienced several fixed object crashes. Objects at this location were frequently spaced light standards with concrete bases constructed in the narrow raised island. For the southbound direction of travel, several crashes occurred immediately adjacent to the Coronado Hotel area. At this location there is a small rigid wall located just beyond a narrow sidewalk on the outside of a horizontal curve. It is worth noting that unfamiliar drivers could be observed visibly tapping their brakes at this location as they looked at the historic hotel. For the southbound direction of travel at the southern end of the study region, the speed limit increases at the same time as the curb and gutter is replaced by a wide paved shoulder. At this same location there is a tall rigid wall located approximately 15 to 16 ft from the edge of the shoulder. The most frequently hit objects along this corridor were curb, barrier or guardrail followed by signal poles, posts, trees, walls, and embankments. 14

Figure A-8. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 75 -- Map 15

Table A-8. Crash Type Summary, State Highway 75, San Diego County, CA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 0 1 0 1 1 1 4 Head-On 0 0 2 0 0 2 4 Hit Object 13 8 9 10 13 8 61 Pedestrian 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 Rear End 23 27 59 33 49 34 225 Sideswipe 5 11 9 6 12 11 54 Others (Total) Overturned 1 0 1 1 1 1 5 Undefined Others 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Total Crashes 43 47 80 52 76 59 357 Table A-9. Crash Severity Summary, State Highway 75, San Diego County, CA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 27(8) 32(5) 61(8) 32(5) 48(6) 37(6) 237(38) Injury (Total) Possible Injury 12(3) 9(1) 13(1) 12(2) 20(6) 18(1) 84(14) Non-Incapacitating 4(2) 6(2) 4(0) 7(2) 7(1) 1(0) 29(7) Incapacitating 0 0 2(0) 1(1) 0 3(1) 6(2) Fatal 0 0 0 0 1(0) 0 1(0) Total Crashes 43(13) 47(8) 80(9) 52(10) 76(13) 59(8) 357(61) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) 16

UCZ-CA-5: State Highway 76, San Diego County, CA Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with a median on west end changing to three lanes in center then transitioning back to two, then one lane per direction of travel towards the east end of corridor, On-street parking not permitted, Bicycle lane available length of corridor with turn lanes and wide shoulder located on far side of bicycle lane, Curb varies from rolled asphalt curb at extreme west end, to raised curb near intersections, to sloping curb at most non-intersection locations, Land use is commercial, Road horizontal geometry generally straight, Road vertical grade level to rolling while roadside grade is extreme in several locations, Posted speed limit 55 mph entire length, No bus stops available, Sidewalk periodically available with some locations designed as a concrete v-ditch for drainage options, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located within 2 to 3 ft of curb face near intersections and then placed further away from road mid-block, and No street furniture except for periodic trees or gateways into adjacent property. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Extreme roadside terrain next to sloping curb beyond 10 ft shoulder source of several crashes including fatalities. At many locations there are steep changes (downgrades) in terrain just beyond the sloping curbs and trees are located at the base of these sideslope areas. Roadside crashes occur at lane merges (just beyond intersections). At these locations there are common urban roadside elements including light poles located within approximately 4 ft from the curb. 17

Figure A-9. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 76 Map 1 18

Figure A-10. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 76 Map 2 19

Table A-10. Crash Type Summary, State Highway 76, San Diego County, CA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 20 16 14 10 22 9 91 Head-On 2 3 1 6 3 6 21 Hit Object 11 11 5 6 6 7 46 Pedestrian 0 0 3 0 1 1 5 Rear End 58 81 74 62 87 99 461 Sideswipe 6 7 13 6 16 17 65 Others (Total) Overturned 1 2 2 2 3 7 17 Undefined Others 2 1 2 1 2 1 9 Total Crashes 100 121 114 93 140 147 715 Table A-11. Crash Severity Summary, State Highway 76, San Diego County, CA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 36(8) 22(6) 39(2) 27(2) 42(3) 47(5) 213(26) Injury (Total) Possible Injury 46(2) 65(0) 56(2) 45(2) 69(2) 73(0) 354(8) Non-Incapacitating 15(1) 28(4) 15(1) 16(1) 24(1) 25(1) 123(9) Incapacitating 2(0) 4(1) 4(0) 2(0) 4(0) 1(0) 17(1) Fatal 1(0) 2(0) 0 3(1) 1(0) 1(1) 8(2) Total Crashes 100(11) 121(11) 114(5) 93(6) 140(6) 147(7) 715(46) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) 20

UCZ-CA-6: State Highway 78, San Diego County, CA Corridor characteristics include: Two through lanes in each direction of travel with no median narrowing to one through lanes for each direction of travel near the southern end (from Oak Hill Drive to corridor end), Frequent driveway cuts in center or corridor, Curb and gutter changes to rolled curb and then ultimately disappears as a driver travels southbound, On-street parking not permitted, No bicycle lanes or apparent bicycle facilities, Land use is primarily commercial, Road horizontal geometry generally straight with a few isolated sharp horizontal curves, Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit ranges from 35 to 45 mph, Bus stops not apparent, Sidewalk (approximately 5 to 6 ft wide) is curb-attached, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located within 2 to 3 ft of curb face (often in the center of the sidewalk), and Corridor includes light poles, trees, and utility poles periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Obstacles (light pole, fire hydrants, etc.) located close to curb face (2 to 6 ft) on far side of driveway, Irregular (hard to traverse) terrain adjacent to road including paved v-ditch at some locations, and Lane merge (too short acceleration lane) with utility pole located at the merge point. 21

Figure A-11. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 78 -- Map 22

Table A-12. Crash Type Summary, State Highway 78, San Diego County, CA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 11 15 15 20 17 16 94 Head-On 3 6 1 5 4 2 21 Hit Object 5 6 5 6 5 12 39 Pedestrian 0 1 2 2 1 2 8 Rear End 13 13 12 10 10 11 69 Sideswipe 2 5 3 4 3 6 23 Others (Total) Overturned 2 1 1 1 0 2 7 Undefined Others 4 1 1 1 0 0 7 Total Crashes 40 48 40 49 40 51 268 Table A-13. Crash Severity Summary, State Highway 78, San Diego County, CA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 16(3) 16(4) 9(3) 15(2) 13(3) 16(7) 85(22) Injury (Total) Possible Injury 15(1) 20(1) 15(0) 15(1) 18(0) 16(0) 99(3) Non-Incapacitating 8(1) 9(0) 11(1) 16(2) 8(2) 15(4) 67(10) Incapacitating 1(0) 2(1) 4(1) 0 1(0) 4(1) 12(3) Fatal 0 1(0) 1(0) 3(1) 0 0 5(1) Total Crashes 40(5) 48(6) 40(5) 49(6) 40(5) 51(12) 268(39) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) 23

UCZ-CA-7: State Highway 90, Orange County, CA Corridor characteristics include: West end has two through-lanes in each direction of travel with turn lanes as needed at intersections expanding to three through-lanes in each direction for milepoints 4.0 to 8.0 (note: four-lane section has wide striped shoulder in front of curb used to develop right turn lanes), On-street parking not permitted, No separate bicycle facilities, Land use is commercial with periodic driveways, Road horizontal geometry generally straight with two to three horizontal curves, Road vertical grade generally level to rolling, Posted speed limit ranges from 35 to 50 mph (one 0.2 mile 25 mph school zone), Bus stops located far-side and mid-block, Sidewalk is curb-attached from milepoint 3.0 to 6.0, then separated with a landscape buffer from 6.0 to 8.0, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located within 1 to 2 ft of curb face, and Corridor includes street furniture (benches, trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Locations with utility poles plus street lights located in the curb-attached sidewalk and within 1 to 1.5 feet from the curb face were common roadside crash sources both on tangents and at horizontal curve locations, The far side of intersections and several driveways (particularly in the eastbound direction) have poles located in the immediate vicinity. Many appear to have been impacted by vehicles. A far-side bus bay with a driveway then merges traffic back into the normal lane configuration for about 10 ft before beginning a right turn lane. At this location a pole is in the merge point. Several crashes occurred here but it is not clear if they were due to the roadside obstruction or driver confusion thinking this was the right turn lane for the upcoming intersection and/or driveway. 24

Figure A-12. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 90 -- Map 25

Table A-14. Crash Type Summary, State Highway 90, Orange County, CA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 18 41 59 40 49 54 261 Head-On 2 0 4 5 8 7 26 Hit Object 8 19 17 9 9 15 77 Pedestrian 1 1 6 3 2 0 13 Rear End 66 150 158 136 127 117 754 Sideswipe 17 53 40 34 51 46 241 Others (Total) Overturned 0 0 0 0 3 1 4 Undefined Others 2 7 2 2 2 1 16 Total Crashes 114 271 286 229 251 241 1392 Table A-15. Crash Severity Summary, State Highway 90, Orange County, CA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 67(6) 175(15) 167(14) 142(7) 160(5) 161(12) 872(59) Injury (Total) Possible Injury 31(0) 77(1) 96(1) 72(1) 68(2) 57(3) 401(8) Non-Incapacitating 14(2) 18(2) 20(2) 13(1) 19(2) 21(0) 105(9) Incapacitating 2(0) 1(1) 2(0) 2(0) 4(0) 1(0) 12(1) Fatal 0 0 1(0) 0 0 1(0) 2(0) Total Crashes 114(8) 271(19) 286(17) 229(9) 251(9) 241(15) 1392(77) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) 26

Georgia Sites Table A-16. Georgia Study Corridors Georgia Study Corridor County Name Length (miles) Alpharetta Highway Fulton 2.2 Briarcliff Road DeKalb 2.6 Candler Road DeKalb 3.5 14 th Street / Peachtree Street Fulton 3.0 Franklin Road Cobb 2.3 Moreland Avenue DeKalb 4.0 Roswell Road (1) Cobb 2.0 Roswell Road (2) Cobb 2.0 Roswell Road Fulton 2.2 Total: 23.8 UCA-GA-1: Alpharetta Highway, Fulton County, GA Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with no median and turn lanes developing as needed at intersections and some driveways (right turn lanes for driveways), On-street not permitted, No separate or dedicated bicycle facilities), Land use is commercial, Road horizontal geometry straight with two or three horizontal curves, Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit ranges from 40 to 45 mph, Bus stops locations not apparent, Sidewalk is curb-attached for only short segment, for most of corridor sidewalk configuration includes small (approximately 3 ft) landscape buffer next to the curb, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located beyond the sidewalk (8 to 10 ft from curb face), and Corridor includes minimal street furniture (trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: No obvious problems beyond the frequent placement of poles on the far side of driveways or intersections with pedestrian ramps creating easy access for errant vehicles. 27

Figure A-13. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, Alpharetta Highway -- Map 28

Table A-17. Crash Type Summary, Alpharetta Highway, Fulton County, GA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 187 226 201 230 186 186 1216 Head-On 18 11 9 16 7 7 68 Fixed Object 10 23 5 12 11 11 72 Pedestrian 3 2 3 6 2 2 18 Rear End 320 369 316 384 341 370 2100 Sideswipe (Total) Opposite Direction 5 6 8 2 1 0 22 Same Direction 55 55 52 65 61 61 349 Total Crashes 598 692 594 715 609 637 3845 Table A-18. Crash Severity Summary, Alpharetta Highway, Fulton County, GA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 477(8) 535(16) 477(5) 562(8) 496(7) 509(10) 3056(54) Injury 120(2) 157(7) 117(0) 153(4) 112(3) 128(1) 787(17) Fatal 1(0) 0 0 0 1(1) 0 2(1) Total Crashes 598(10) 692(23) 594(5) 715(12) 609(11) 637(11) 3845(72) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) 29

UCZ-GA-2: Briarcliff Road NE / Druid Hills Road NE, DeKalb County, GA Corridor characteristics include: Briarcliff Road section has one through-lane per direction with periodic turn lanes (some right turn lanes for driveways), Druid Hills Road has three through-lanes in each direction of travel with periodic turn lanes, Curb varies from no curb to standard curb and gutter, but for most of the site the curb appears to be a monolithic granite common to Atlanta historic roads (roadside ditches often present as a result), On-street parking not permitted for either corridor, Bicycle lane in portion of Briarcliff Road corridor (milepoint 12.7 to 13.4), Land use is commercial, Road horizontal geometry characterized by frequent horizontal curves, Road vertical grade level to rolling, Posted speed limit ranges from 35, Bus stop locations not apparent, Sidewalk is not continuous and varies between curb-attached and separation by narrow (2 to 3 ft) buffer that sometimes is landscaped and sometimes is paved with a red brick appearance, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located for most of the corridor 8 to 10 ft beyond curb face but in several locations at southern end merge close to road, and Corridor includes street furniture (trash cans, trees) periodically including a couple of heavily wooded regions. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Far side utility poles at intersections and driveways common source of fixed object crashes, Objects within 2 to 3 ft on outside of horizontal curve source of cluster crashes, Non-traversable driveway headwall/culvert responsible for at least one or more crashes, Lane merge (milepoint 11.5) with 2 poles at the merge point (numerous skid marks demonstrate this is a common crash or near crash location). 30

Figure A-14. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, Briarcliff Road / Druid Hills Road -- Map 31

Table A-19. Crash Type Summary, Briarcliff Road NE, DeKalb County, GA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 252 225 176 202 202 194 1251 Head-On 9 9 10 2 15 2 47 Fixed Object 27 12 18 10 11 10 88 Pedestrian 4 2 0 6 0 2 14 Rear End 297 265 248 251 266 255 1582 Sideswipe (Total) Opposite Direction 13 7 6 9 24 8 67 Same Direction 46 55 49 47 69 77 343 Total Crashes 648 575 507 527 587 548 3392 Table A-20. Crash Severity Summary, Briarcliff Road NE, DeKalb County, GA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 512(22) 450(7) 412(11) 431(7) 508(10) 450(8) 2763(65) Injury 136(5) 125(5) 95(7) 96(3) 79(1) 96(2) 627(23) Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 2(0) 2(0) Total Crashes 648(27) 575(12) 507(18) 527(10) 587(11) 548(10) 3392(88) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) UCZ-GA-3: Candler Road / Flat Shoals Parkway, DeKalb County, GA Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with a median and turn lanes periodically, Curb and gutter, On-street parking not permitted, No dedicated bicycle facilities, Near highway entrances there are several locations with guardrail at intersections (wrapped around curb return area), Land use is commercial, Road horizontal geometry gently curves, Road vertical grade level to rolling, Posted speed limit ranges from 45 mph, Sidewalk varies from discontinuous to curb-attached to separated with a buffer, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located beyond sidewalk where present and utilities are shared (lights and electric on same pole) in many locations, Corridor includes very little street furniture but has several locations with street trees or tree lines. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Far side utilities and/or wrapped guardrail at intersections and driveways (several hit), Irregular terrain with trees beyond sidewalk at cluster crash locations (includes one fatality location with steep slope upward). 32

Figure A-15. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, Candler Road / Flat Shoals Parkway -- Map 33

Table A-21. Crash Type Summary, Candler Rd./Flat Shoals Pkwy., DeKalb County, GA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 224 252 256 198 203 229 1362 Head-On 18 13 11 9 12 16 79 Fixed Object 20 23 26 23 23 19 134 Pedestrian 7 9 11 9 8 7 51 Rear End 200 243 229 246 230 226 1374 Sideswipe (Total) Opposite Direction 12 15 10 12 14 12 75 Same Direction 46 65 61 63 60 73 368 Total Crashes 527 620 604 560 550 582 3443 Table A-22. Crash Severity Summary, Candler Rd./Flat Shoals Pkwy., DeKalb County, GA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 394(12) 447(18) 456(19) 421(19) 422(19) 464(13) 2604(100) Injury 133(8) 173(5) 148(7) 138(4) 127(4) 116(5) 835(33) Fatal 0 0 0 1(0) 1(0) 2(1) 4(1) Total Crashes 527(20) 620(23) 604(26) 560(23) 550(23) 582(19) 3443(134) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) UCZ-GA-4: 14 th Street / Peachtree Street, Fulton County, GA Corridor characteristics include: 14 th Street corridor has two through-lanes in each direction of travel with no median, the W. Peachtree segment has 5 lanes in one direction of travel (one-way segment), and the Peachtree Road varies between 2 to 3 through-lanes per direction of travel (no median), On-street parking not permitted except for short segment on W. Peachtree one-way, No exclusive bicycle facilities, Land use is commercial, Road horizontal geometry generally straight for 14 th Street and W. Peachtree then curvy for Peachtree Street, Road vertical grade generally level to rolling, Posted speed limit 35 mph, Bus stop locations vary, Sidewalk is curb-attached, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located within inches of back of curb and often at locations with frequent driveways, and Corridor includes street furniture (benches, trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: 34

Utility poles within inches of the back of curb were hit repeatedly (often at the far-side of driveways and intersections but also at mid-block isolated locations). 35

Figure A-16. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, 14 th Street / Peachtree Street -- Map 36

Table A-23. Crash Type Summary, 14 th St., Fulton County, GA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 380 401 352 264 302 305 2004 Head-On 11 15 11 12 17 14 80 Fixed Object 28 38 22 25 31 20 164 Pedestrian 12 7 13 7 9 11 59 Rear End 451 408 401 334 381 254 2229 Sideswipe (Total) Opposite Direction 13 15 14 4 12 6 64 Same Direction 214 230 191 189 184 159 1167 Total Crashes 1109 1114 1004 835 936 769 5767 Table A-24. Crash Severity Summary, 14 th St., Fulton County, GA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 882(14) 898(23) 812(18) 659(13) 759(24) 617(13) 4627(105) Injury 227(14) 216(15) 190(4) 176(11) 176(7) 152(7) 1137(58) Fatal 0 0 2(0) 0 1(0) 0 3(1) Total Crashes 1109(28) 1114(38) 1004(22) 835(25) 936(31) 769(20) 5767(164) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) UCZ-GA-5: Franklin Road, Cobb County, Georgia Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with no median but occasional turn lanes at intersections, On-street not permitted, Road has standard curb and gutter, No exclusive bicycle facilities, Land use is commercial with several apartment complexes, Road horizontal geometry generally curvy, Road vertical grade generally level to rolling, Posted speed limit of 35 mph, Sidewalk ranges from curb attached (in region of eastbound cluster crashes), to discontinuous, to separated by small buffer, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located approximately 8 to 10 3 ft from curb face, and Corridor includes street furniture (mid-block bus shelters, trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Frequent driveways and intersections with poles and short retaining walls located on far side of intersection, Obstacles located within approximately 6 ft of curb hit at horizontal curve locations (also these locations have frequent driveways). 37

Figure A-17. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, Franklin Road -- Map 38

Table A-25. Crash Type Summary, Franklin Rd., Cobb County, GA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 105 107 82 75 78 70 517 Head-On 9 3 6 2 2 2 24 Fixed Object 5 6 11 11 16 7 56 Pedestrian 3 3 1 2 2 5 16 Rear End 87 76 74 65 61 72 435 Sideswipe (Total) Opposite Direction 4 4 1 1 5 4 19 Same Direction 31 24 16 20 17 18 126 Total Crashes 244 223 191 176 181 178 1193 Table A-26. Crash Severity Summary, Franklin Rd., Cobb County, GA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 169(2) 176(6) 137(8) 128(7) 135(13) 123(7) 868(43) Injury 75(3) 46(0) 54(3) 48(4) 46(3) 55(0) 324(13) Fatal 0 1(0) 0 0 0 0 1(0) Total Crashes 244(5) 223(6) 191(11) 176(11) 181(16) 178(7) 1193(56) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) UCA-GA-6: Moreland Avenue / Briarcliff Road Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with occasional turn lanes, On-street parking prohibited, Curb present but due to numerous gutter pan overlays, effective height in many locations appears to be 2 to 3 in., No exclusive bicycle facilities, Land use is commercial, Road horizontal geometry generally straight with curve at largest roadside cluster crash location (near Ponce de Leon Avenue), Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit 35 mph, Sidewalk is curb-attached for most of the corridor, but has a few areas with a buffer, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located within inches of curb face, and Corridor includes street furniture (benches, trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Frequent poles and trees located within inches of the travel lane (no gutter pan visible so traffic immediately adjacent) at cluster crash locations with the largest cluster at the outside of a horizontal curve, Far side poles at intersections and driveways appear to have been hit frequently, Cluster crash locations in tangents consistent for both travel directions indicating the close object proximity and not horizontal geometry is primary cause. 39

Figure A-18. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, Moreland Avenue / Briarcliff Road -- Map 40

Table A-27. Crash Type Summary, Moreland Ave. / Briarcliff Rd., DeKalb County, GA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 209 238 233 206 235 191 1312 Head-On 13 13 10 12 7 14 69 Fixed Object 38 31 31 35 40 44 219 Pedestrian 11 13 8 7 8 13 60 Rear End 225 217 195 204 223 235 1299 Sideswipe (Total) Opposite Direction 30 11 8 11 14 15 89 Same Direction 98 96 114 102 107 123 640 Total Crashes 624 619 599 577 634 635 3688 Table A-28. Crash Severity Summary, Moreland Ave. / Briarcliff Rd., DeKalb County, GA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 435(26) 455(20) 459(20) 448(31) 502(34) 484(26) 2783(157) Injury 189(12) 162(11) 139(11) 129(4) 132(6) 150(18) 901(62) Fatal 0 2(0) 1(0) 0 0 1(0) 4(0) Total Crashes 624(38) 619(31) 599(31) 577(35) 634(40) 635(44) 3688(219) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) UCZ-GA-7: Roswell Road (1), Cobb County, GA Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with a TWLTL initially and a short raised median on the east end of the study corridor, On-street parking not permitted, No exclusive bicycle facilities, Curb and gutter as well as sidewalk not continuous (appear that corridor is under redevelopment and these elements are constructed with the adjacent project), Land use is commercial, Road horizontal geometry generally straight with approximately two horizontal curves, Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit 35, Bus stops located far-side, Sidewalk is curb-attached in some areas and in others separated by a buffer, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located more than 10 ft from curb face or edge of travel lane, and Corridor includes street furniture (benches, trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: The wide clear zone to the utility poles is effective; however, one cluster crash location occurred when a right-turn-lane was added into the adjacent business but the utility poles remained in a line about 1 to 2 ft from the turn lane but approximately 13 to 14 ft from the through lane (poles where not shifted to accommodate offset at turn lane), Roadside ditch with non-traversable headwalls located adjacent to a roadside cluster crash region. 41

Figure A-19. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, Roswell Road (1), Cobb County -- Map 42

Table A-29. Crash Type Summary, Roswell Rd. (1), Cobb County, GA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 17 12 19 9 16 17 90 Head-On 2 1 1 2 1 2 9 Fixed Object 5 13 4 6 3 6 37 Pedestrian 0 3 1 1 0 0 5 Rear End 61 85 93 103 81 72 495 Sideswipe (Total) Opposite Direction 2 0 0 2 0 0 4 Same Direction 3 4 7 0 2 4 20 Total Crashes 90 118 125 123 103 101 660 Table A-30. Crash Severity Summary, Roswell Rd. (1), Cobb County, GA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 76(5) 86(12) 95(4) 93(4) 85(3) 82(4) 517(32) Injury 13(0) 32(1) 30 30(2) 18(0) 19(2) 142(5) Fatal 1(0) 0 0 0 0 0 1(0) Total Crashes 90(5) 118(13) 125(4) 123(6) 103(3) 101(6) 660(37) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) UCZ-GA-8: Roswell Road (2), (Cobb County) Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with a raised median, On-street parking not permitted, No exclusive bicycle facilities, Land use is commercial for southwest end transitioning into the edge of residential development at the northeast end (no residential driveways as they feed onto local and collector corridors), Road horizontal geometry generally straight with a few minor horizontal curves, Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit 45, Bus stops located far-side and mid-block (no bays), Sidewalk is not continuous but where present varies from curb-attached to buffer separated, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located at least 12 to 15 ft from edge of travel lane, and Corridor includes roadside items such as bus stops, trees, and similar urban roadside objects. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: The major length of this corridor is free of roadside crashes. The cluster locations are characterized by locations where re-development has not completely occurred and then roadside has terrain that is uneven (in one case a drainage ditch with trees on the other side and in another case a steep drop with trees beyond a sidewalk). 43

Figure A-20. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, Roswell Road (2), Cobb County -- Map 44

Table A-31. Crash Type Summary, Roswell Rd. (2), Cobb County, GA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 37 35 43 42 51 46 254 Head-On 0 2 2 8 1 5 18 Fixed Object 12 25 20 14 12 12 95 Pedestrian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rear End 48 73 64 80 98 88 451 Sideswipe (Total) Opposite Direction 0 1 1 0 1 1 4 Same Direction 7 9 8 13 18 8 63 Total Crashes 104 145 138 157 181 160 885 Table A-32. Crash Severity Summary, Roswell Rd. (2), Cobb County, GA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 69(10) 105(23) 94(15) 117(13) 133(11) 129(8) 647(80) Injury 35(2) 40(2) 44(5) 40(1) 48(1) 30(4) 237(15) Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 1(0) 1(0) Total Crashes 104(12) 145(25) 138(20) 157(14) 181(12) 160(12) 885(95) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) UCZ-GA-9: Roswell Road (Fulton County) Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with periodic turn lanes, On-street parking prohibited, No exclusive bicycle facilities, Land use is commercial, Road horizontal geometry varies between straight and curved, Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit ranges from 35 to 45 mph, Bus stops located mid-block, Sidewalk varies between curb-attached to buffer separated, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects frequently located within 1 to 2 ft of curb face, and Corridor includes street furniture (benches, trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: The placement of utility poles is the primary problem along this corridor. For two sections of the corridor there appears to be a beautification program including pole relocation and (on the far south end) placement of power underground. At these locations the roadside crash problem improved except for one location where ornamental street lights were located along a stretch of blanket driveways. Elsewhere poles are within inches of the road and have been hit in both tangent and horizontal curve locations. This includes poles at intersection and driveway far side locations. 45

Figure A-21. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, Roswell Road, Fulton County -- Map 46

Table A-33. Crash Type Summary, Roswell Rd., Fulton County, GA Crash Type 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Angle/Broadside 253 211 211 204 176 163 1218 Head-On 9 12 12 8 12 5 58 Fixed Object 13 11 20 21 15 6 86 Pedestrian 8 9 4 7 8 10 46 Rear End 215 197 206 234 202 173 1227 Sideswipe (Total) Opposite Direction 5 6 4 11 5 7 38 Same Direction 54 52 55 43 47 44 295 Total Crashes 557 498 512 528 465 408 2968 Table A-34. Crash Severity Summary, Roswell Rd., Fulton County, GA Severity 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total No Injury 454(10) 406(9) 424(13) 422(14) 365(11) 320(5) 2391(62) Injury 101(3) 92(2) 86(7) 106(7) 100(4) 88(1) 573(24) Fatal 2(0) 0 2(0) 0 0 0 4(0) Total Crashes 557(13) 498(11) 512(20) 528(21) 465(15) 408(6) 2968(86) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) 47

Illinois Sites Table A-35. Illinois Study Corridors Illinois Study Corridor County Name Length (miles) State Highway 6 Will 7.4 State Highway 14 Cook 10.3 State Highway 19 Cook 5.7 State Highway 19 DuPage 7.5 State Highway 25 Kane 8.5 State Highway 31 Kane 8.7 State Highway 41 Cook 10.3 Total: 54.4 UCZ-IL-1: Route 6, Will County, IL Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with a median or TWLTL for most of the study corridor. Travel directions become one-way pairs in central business district. On-street parking periodically provided, No exclusive bicycle facilities provided, Land use is commercial with minor industrial and residential, Road horizontal geometry generally straight, Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit ranges from 30 to 55 mph, Bus stop locations not evident, Sidewalk is curb-attached and buffer separated at various locations along corridor, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located within 1 to 1.5 ft of curb face in several locations, and Corridor includes street furniture (benches, trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Large number of crashes into an underpass structure due to an atypical design unique to this site, Buffer strips varied; however, locations where buffer strips are greater than or equal to 6- feet wide experienced fewer crashes, Poles placed in line with frangible trees were hit, but poles placed against or beyond sidewalk were rarely impacted, and The most frequently hit objects along this corridor were an underpass structure, fences, trees, mailboxes, utility poles, buildings or structures, and other (unknown) roadside objects followed by light standards, cur or island, and poles or posts. 48

Figure A-22. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 6 Map 1 49

Figure A-23. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 6 Map 2 50

Table A-36. Crash Type Summary, State Highway 6, Will County, IL Crash Type 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total Angle/Broadside 80 91 52 42 47 52 364 Head-On 6 4 7 5 3 1 26 Hit Object (Total) Fixed Object 9 13 21 14 18 11 86 Other Object 3 2 1 3 2 11 Pedestrian 5 5 2 4 2 3 21 Rear End 55 61 60 42 34 44 296 Sideswipe (Total) Opposite Direction 10 3 4 1 2 2 22 Same Direction 24 34 25 23 18 33 157 Others (Total) Animal 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 Non-collision 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 Overturned 0 1 1 3 0 0 5 Parking Maneuver 3 5 12 10 6 6 42 Pedal Cyclist 3 2 1 0 1 2 9 Turning Movement 28 26 62 58 65 59 298 Undefined Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Crashes 227 247 250 207 198 214 1343 Table A-37. Crash Severity Summary, Route 6, Will County, IL Severity 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total No Injury 163(8) 170(9) 185(16) 165(14) 156(15) 138(6) 977(68) Injury (Total) Possible Injury 26(0) 28(0) 27(2) 18(0) 15(0) 32(2) 146(4) Non-Incapacitating 24(0) 41(3) 30(1) 18(0) 22(2) 29(2) 164(8) Incapacitating 14(1) 6(0) 7(1) 6(0) 5(1) 14(1) 52(4) Fatal 0 2(1) 1(1) 0 0 1(0) 4(2) Total Crashes 227(9) 247(13) 250(21) 207(14) 198(18) 214(11) 1343(86) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) 51

UCZ-IL-2: Route 14, Cook County, IL Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with a median or TWLTL for most of the study corridor, No on-street parking provided, No separate bicycle facilities provided, Land use is commercial with minor residential and industrial at extreme corridor ends, Road horizontal geometry generally straight, Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit ranges from 30 to 40 mph (with 20 mph school zone), Bus stops not obvious, Sidewalk not continuous but is curb-attached in general with some buffer strips present, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located within 2 to 3 ft of curb face in some areas, and Corridor includes street furniture (benches, trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Large number of crashes into concrete median. Two types of medians are present a small median at intersection approaches with traffic signs and an access management median (extremely narrow) at the west end of the corridor. Both medians are hard to see as the curb faces are not painted and the physical design of both medians is small. Several crashes involved traffic signals (this was the second most frequently hit object) while islands (third most frequently hit item) were also impacted. At many of these locations, the signal pole is in the directional island at an intersection. Other common objects hit included light standards, poles or posts, and utility poles. At one location a cluster of these crashes occurred when pole placement shifted from a 5 to 6 ft offset down to a 1 to 2 ft offset (in a straight section of road). In addition to the objects listed above, common impacted fixed objects included mailboxes, trees, undefined roadside objects, impact attenuators, ditches or embankment, guardrail ends, and other misc. items. 52

Figure A-24. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 14 Map 1 53

Figure A-25. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 14 Map 2 54

Figure A-26. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 14 Map 3 55

Table A-38. Crash Type Summary, State Highway 14, Cook County, IL Crash Type 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total Angle/Broadside 103 104 65 58 74 76 480 Head-On 5 5 4 6 5 1 26 Hit Object (Total) Fixed Object 12 18 29 15 25 27 126 Other Object 0 0 2 6 5 4 17 Pedestrian 7 9 7 1 10 10 44 Rear End 224 235 267 227 238 241 1432 Sideswipe (Total) Opposite Direction 8 5 2 5 2 1 23 Same Direction 50 42 52 51 57 29 281 Others (Total) Animal 0 3 1 2 2 4 12 Non-collision 3 0 1 3 2 0 9 Overturned 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Parking Maneuver 2 4 5 5 2 2 20 Pedal Cyclist 2 0 2 3 5 5 17 Turning Movement 72 86 150 159 167 153 787 Undefined Others 9 0 1 0 0 0 10 Total Crashes 497 511 588 541 594 554 3285 Table A-39. Crash Severity Summary, State Highway 14, Cook County, IL Severity 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total No Injury 371(9) 403(13) 459(19) 437(13) 497(22) 431(23) 2598(99) Injury (Total) Possible Injury 68(1) 42(3) 53(3) 47(0) 39(0) 55(0) 304(7) Non-Incapacitating 38(2) 50(1) 51(3) 40(1) 41(2) 51(2) 271(11) Incapacitating 19(0) 16(1) 21(1) 16(1) 15(1) 16(2) 103(6) Fatal 1(0) 0 4(3) 1(0) 2(0) 1(0) 9(3) Total Crashes 497(12) 511(18) 588(29) 541(15) 594(25) 554(27) 3285(126) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) 56

UCZ-IL-3: Route 19, Cook County, IL Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with a periodic median for most of the study corridor narrowing to 3 lanes (1 EB and 2 WB) then to 2 lanes only at the east end of the corridor, On-street parking periodically provided, No exclusive bicycle facilities provided, Land use is commercial but a nature preserve is located between milepoints 3.6 and 4.7 (thus a higher posted speed limit), Road horizontal geometry generally straight, Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit ranges from 30 to 45 mph, Bus stops located far-side, Sidewalk varies from curb-attached to separated by a buffer strip, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located within 2 to 3 ft of curb face in some high crash locations, and Corridor includes street furniture (benches, trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Cluster pole crashes (utility poles, light standards, and traffic signal poles) occurred generally where poles were within 1 to 2 ft of the curb face or near driveways or pedestrian access ramps at intersections. In general, trees were located on the far side of sidewalks and rarely hit; however, in some locations trees were located closer to curb (within 1 to 2 ft in eastbound direction) and frequently hit at these locations. In addition to the poles and trees identified above, the most frequently hit objects were mailboxes, curb or island, fences, other (unidentified objects), and the concrete median. 57

Figure A-27. Fixed-Object Crash Locations, State Highway 19 (Cook) Map 58

Table A-40. Crash Type Summary, Route 19, Cook County, IL Crash Type 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total Angle/Broadside 93 102 54 41 36 42 368 Head-On 8 4 4 1 0 1 18 Hit Object (Total) Fixed Object 15 13 19 17 22 25 111 Other Object 4 3 2 1 1 3 14 Pedestrian 5 3 3 2 6 1 20 Rear End 200 143 164 157 167 163 994 Sideswipe (Total) Opposite Direction 3 3 3 1 3 3 16 Same Direction 29 34 15 18 21 17 134 Others (Total) Animal 3 0 4 1 2 3 13 Non-collision 1 4 3 1 0 2 11 Overturned 1 4 0 0 0 1 6 Parking Maneuver 2 0 2 3 2 0 9 Pedal Cyclist 3 6 6 4 4 4 27 Turning Movement 61 53 127 134 130 135 640 Undefined Others 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 Total Crashes 429 372 406 381 395 400 2383 Table A-41. Crash Severity Summary, Route 19, Cook County, IL Severity 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total No Injury 303(12) 260(8) 301(16) 269(15) 295(15) 279(18) 1707(84) Injury (Total) Possible Injury 52(0) 48(1) 55(0) 46(0) 35(1) 54(0) 290(2) Non-Incapacitating 45(1) 45(2) 37(2) 49(2) 49(2) 43(5) 268(14) Incapacitating 28(2) 16(0) 12(1) 17(0) 16(4) 23(2) 112(9) Fatal 1(0) 3(2) 1(0) 0 0 1(0) 6(2) Total Crashes 429(15) 372(13) 406(19) 381(17) 395(22) 400(25) 2383(111) Note: Values shown in the format of Total (Fixed Object) 59

UCZ-IL-4: Route 19 (DuPage County) Corridor characteristics include: Two through-lanes in each direction of travel with a median or TWLTL for most of the study corridor narrowing to two lanes total periodically, On-street parking periodically provided, No exclusive bicycle facilities available at this site, Land use is commercial and residential, Road horizontal geometry generally straight, Road vertical grade generally level, Posted speed limit ranges from 30 to 45 mph, Bus stop locations not obvious, Sidewalk is not continuous and treatment varies, Utility poles, street lights, and other objects located within 1 to 3 ft of curb face in cluster crash locations, and Corridor includes street furniture (benches, trash cans, trees) periodically. Corridor diagnosis for cluster roadside crashes: Cluster pole crashes (utility poles, lights, posts, and railroad or traffic signals) occurred generally where poles were with a 1 to 2 ft of the curb face or 8 to 10 ft of lane edge where curb was not present. Other locations with curb had pole placement 4 to 6 ft from the curb with very few mid-block pole crashes. This corridor did not have much landscaping in the commercial areas. At the residential areas trees were generally more than 10 ft from the road. A small landscaped buffer appeared periodically but only 5 trees were hit in the corridor due to their sparse placement with generally acceptable lateral offsets. In addition to the poles, signals, posts, and trees referenced above, common fixed objects included curb or island and mailboxes followed to a lesser degree by buildings or structures, other unidentified objects, and ditches or embankments. 60