US Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

Similar documents
City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

Designing for Pedestrian Safety. Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation Guideline Development

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

UNCONTROLLED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES

Crosswalk Policy Revisions & Pedestrian & Bicycle Connection Plans. Presentation to Sanibel City Council July 16, 2013

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Appendix A. Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines. Appendix A: Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines Knox to Oak Ridge Greenway Master Plan

Development of Arlington County s Marked Crosswalk Guidelines. Jon Lawler, P.E. Design Engineer Arlington County, VA

700 Multi-Modal Considerations

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

City of Prince Albert Statement of POLICY and PROCEDURE. Department: Public Works Policy No. 66. Section: Transportation Issued: July 14, 2014

Off-road Trails. Guidance

1 To provide direction to Administration when determining the appropriate Pedestrian Crossing Control Device for a particular location.

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

Chapter V TRAFFIC CONTROLS. Tewodros N.

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

Township Signing Practices

Ohio Share the Road Driver s s Education Unit

Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

Geometric Design Tables

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE TRAFFIC CODE UPDATE MASTER RECOMMENDATION REPORT: 9.14, 9.16, 9.18

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX

Appendix Work Zone Traffic Control

Document 2 - City of Ottawa Pedestrian Crossover (PXO) Program

Traffic Control Devices

2004 NC Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street

Including Revision 1 dated May 2012 and Revision 2 dated May 2012

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 405 LIMB MANAGEMENT

Bowman-Melton Associates, Inc. june 2011

Table of Contents. I. Introduction 1. II. Elements of the School Crossing Program 1

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

TRANSMITTAL LETTER. Revision to Publication 149, Chapter 20 (Criteria for the Design of Traffic Signal Supports) - March 2009 Edition

Drivers Responsibilities to Pedestrians

OBJECTIVE: Improve safety by designing all bicycle facilities to the latest AASHTO bicycle guidelines and 2009 MUTCD Standards.

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Guide Recommendations and Case Study. FHWA Safety Program.

MUTCD Part 6D: Pedestrian and Worker Safety

GLOSSARY CROSSWALK. CROSSING TYPES

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

G AT E WAY PLAN. Community BRIEFING KIT GATEWAY BIKE

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

POTENTIAL PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT INTERCHANGES

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

(This page left intentionally blank)

Proposed changes to Massachusetts MUTCD Supplement

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Traffic Signs and Markings. Instructor: Dr. Yahya Sarraj Associate Prof. Of Transportation

City of Dallas Standards and Guidelines for Traffic Control and Safety Treatments at Trail-Road Crossings

Pedestrians safety. ROAD SAFETY SEMINAR PIARC/AGEPAR/GRSP Lome, Togo October 2006 Lise Fournier, Canada-Qu

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL

Traffic Signs (1 of 3)

Readington Road (C.R. 637) Construction

PART 4 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Speed Control & Limits

Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

In response to your request for information on mid-block pedestrian crossing policies and guidelines, the following information is enclosed:

IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS. Guidelines for Marked Crosswalks

Pavement Markings (1 of 3)

Shared Use Path Design

Appendix A-6. Signing and Marking Guidelines. Number Name Pages. 2B.06 Signing at T Intersections 1. 2B.12 Pedestrians in Crosswalk 1

J-Turn An Intersection Safety Improvement Purdue Road School 2016 Tuesday, March 8, 2016 Brian Malone, INDOT & Josh Cook, HNTB

DRAFT Sellwood Bridge Existing Roadway Deficiencies

Driveway Design Criteria

Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 306 DRAINAGE PIPE WORK DESCRIPTION 4

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Engineering Countermeasures for Transportation Safety. Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

Traffic Engineering and Highway Safety Bulletin June Overview

MEMORANDUM. Discussion of the planned crosswalk improvement on Mount Vernon Road near Stratham Drive

STREET and UTILITY REPAIRS WORK AREA PROTECTION GUIDE

What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety

Transcription:

Town of Nags Head US Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting Prepared by: Department of Public Works August 8, 2013

Where traffic-control signals are not in place or in operation the driver of a vehicle shall yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within any marked crosswalk or within any unmarked crosswalk at or near an intersection (NCGS 20-173a) Whenever any vehicle is stopped at a crosswalk at an intersection to permit a pedestrian to cross, the driver of any other vehicle approaching from the rear shall not overtake and pass such stopped vehicle. (NCGS 20-173b) NC Pedestrian Laws

Crosswalk: Any portion of a roadway at an intersection or elsewhere distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface. (1992 Uniform Vehicle Code) Roadway: That portion of a highway improved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel, exclusive of the shoulder. (NCGS 20-4.01(38)) Pedestrian Laws (Cont d)

PEDESTRIANS Do not assume drivers can or will stop. It is the responsibility of the pedestrian to ensure that it is safe to proceed across the roadway. Do not assume a driver has seen you. Establish eye contact with the driver before entering a crosswalk. Watch all lanes you must cross. Even though one vehicle has stopped, vehicles may pass in another lane or in an opposite direction. Cross the street within the marked lines of the crosswalk. Your full attention should be directed to oncoming traffic. DRIVERS BE ALERT! Use good judgment. Be aware of your surroundings. Pedestrian Safety A Shared Responsibility Striking a pedestrian in a crosswalk is extremely difficult to defend & can lead to severe liability consequences. Be attentive when traveling through crosswalks. Be prepared to stop. Do not overtake and pass other vehicles stopped for pedestrians on your side of the roadway. Be aware that some pedestrians may challenge you to stop since they have the right-of-way in the crosswalk. Failure to yield to a pedestrian within a marked crosswalk is a violation of state law.

(1) In-street Pedestrian Crossing sign is allowed per crosswalk location; The sign should be placed at the roadway centerline adjacent to the crosswalk, not in the crosswalk ; If a center island is provided, the sign should be placed on the island; The sign should look like this For signs placed in the roadway, the sign support shall comply with the breakaway requirements of the latest edition of AASHTO s Specification for Structural Supports for Highways Signs, Luminaries, and Traffic Signals. The sign may be used seasonably to prevent damage, and may be removed at night if the pedestrian activity at night is minimal. Pedestrian Signage

Little Bridge Pedestrian Crossing Whalebone Junction Little Bridge Pirates Cove Washington Baum Bridge

475 Lone Cedar Restaurant Fin n Feather Motel 860 Little Bridge

Ex. Crosswalk Ex. Refuge Island AADT=17,000 Little Bridge Access Parking Lot

Lack of visibility of Refuge Island The vertical crest in the Little Bridge and the horizontal curve transition for the Washington Baum bridge create limited sight distance. Motorists have few visual cues to the presence of the pedestrian crossing. When pedestrians are in the crosswalk, one lane of traffic will stop while the other lane of traffic continues on. The posted speed limit is 50 mph with actual speeds averaging between 55-60 mph. Minimal visibility at night. Uncertainty of motorists when to yield for pedestrians. The Predicament

1. Rated from safest solution to least effective. 2. Cost for Implementation. 3. Conformance to NCDOT, AASHTO, MUTCD, & FHWA Standards and regulations. 4. Ease of Implementation. 5. Existing Condition Review Evaluation Criteria

Benefits Provides for complete separation of pedestrians from vehicles Traffic Flow Improvements Barriers Cost range $500k to $2M Overpass Siting- offset 75 west of current location Pedestrians may take more direct route Underpass-inadequate vertical clearance Conflicts w/ex. utilities ADA Accessibility #1 Overpass/Underpass Photos courtesy of GatorBridge.

Benefits Removal of Pedestrian/Vehicle conflicts Economical to implement Barriers Removal of a longstanding recreational access where there is a will there is a way #2 Eliminate Access to North Side of Bridge

Benefits Improved crossing facilities Reduce pedestrian/ vehicle conflicts Barriers Estimated Cost: $100,000 Inadequate pedestrian crossings to satisfy MUTCD warrant Siting: offset 140 west of current crosswalk Pedestrians may bypass to take more direct route #3 Traffic Signal Installation

Benefits Provides additional visual cues for motorists Moderately Effective to implement: $15K-$20k Barriers Estimated to be between 25%-40% effective Are visual cues adequate at the existing vehicle speeds May require other treatments such as yield bars #4 Pedestrian Warning Signal Installation

Benefits Decreases stopping sight distance for motorists Cost Effective to implement Can reduce severity of pedestrian crashes Barriers Effectiveness: studies have NOT concluded that speed limit is not significantly related to crash frequency Decreased level of service - traffic flow #5 Reduce Speed Limit

#6 Pavement Markings/Crosswalk Enhancements Benefits Differentiate from Visual Clutter Cost Effective to implement: $3k to $20k Alert motorists to hazards ahead Barriers Some treatments are not suitable for higher speeds of traffic May create an additional hazard May have to be paired with other measures

Benefits Increases Pedestrian Awareness & Behavior Provide information to motorists of changing conditions Ease of Implementation Barriers Can require a long-term commitment for effectiveness Keep it interesting for public #7 Pedestrian/Driver Education

Diagonal Hatch Markings Hi-Vis Delineators Added Streetlight

Questions? Next Steps