Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

Similar documents
City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Calming Strategic Implementation Plan. January 18, 2011

Project Team. Refined Pedestrian Crossing Toolbox. Problem Statement. Aerial of Study Corridor. Crossing Accommodations and Pedestrian Fatalities

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

The DC Pedestrian Master Plan

ADA Training Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) 2018 MnDOT

UNCONTROLLED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

TULSA CITY COUNCIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK FORCE MEETING JANUARY

Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan Public Comment Report

STATUS OF 2009 PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN (AS OF DECEMBER 2013)

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets

SRTS IMPLEMENTATION COSTS

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

Document 2 - City of Ottawa Pedestrian Crossover (PXO) Program

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study. Old Colony Planning Council

Memo. Introduction. Memphis STP Pedestrian Sidewalk Project

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2013

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

Designing for Pedestrian Safety in Washington, DC

Pedestrian Project List and Prioritization

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Bicycle Facilities Planning

The Corporation of the City of Sarnia. School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy

IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS. Guidelines for Marked Crosswalks

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TREATMENTS

GLOSSARY CROSSWALK. CROSSING TYPES

HYATTSVILLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. City Council Update March 19, 2018

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines 2016

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

Peer Review of Highlands Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Plan

County of Spartanburg South Carolina

This page intentionally left blank.

ADA & Public Rights of Way

3.1 TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESS SUMMARY

Traffic Control Signals - Cosburn Avenue and Cedarvale Avenue

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

POLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Shawn Turner, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute

TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL

WELCOME Public Information Centre

Section 4: Inventory Methodology and Findings

Montclair s Complete Streets Experience

Guidance for Installation of Pedestrian Crosswalks on Michigan State Trunkline Highways

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

MEMORANDUM. Discussion of the planned crosswalk improvement on Mount Vernon Road near Stratham Drive

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

Community Transportation Plan

Crosswalk Policy Revisions & Pedestrian & Bicycle Connection Plans. Presentation to Sanibel City Council July 16, 2013

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

CRESTON ROAD COMPLETE AND SUSTAINABLE STREETS CORRIDOR PLAN

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

Town of Wakarusa. Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT ROUNDABOUTS

Roosevelt Estates Neighborhood Improvements

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW

Bicycle Boulevards and Neighborhood Greenways

C/CAG. Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit. San Mateo-Foster City School District JUNE 2013

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy & Guidelines

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

ADA PRESENTATION (CURB RAMPS)

C. Best Practice Pedestrian Treatment Toolbox

Public Information Centre

Closing Plenary Session

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

Bicycle + Pedestrian Connectivity Gap Analysis

Town of Bourbon. Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way

Improve the livability of our streets by

Operations -- Transit From: N/A To: N/A. Improvement Type: Regionally Significant: No

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

Driveway Design Criteria

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

POLICY: TRAFFIC CALMING

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Steps to Conducting a Complete Streets Assessment

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan: Chapters 3 and 4 Distribution

2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle and Safe Routes to School Application for Funding Page 1 of 31

F L E T C H E R A V E N U E

Transcription:

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs Council Meeting October 20, 2015 Presented by Rita Hu and Jamal Mahmoud

Program Goals Implement the City s comprehensive plan. Provide pedestrian with safe walking routes to schools Provide pedestrian access to public services Fill in gaps in the pedestrian system Provide a priority list of pedestrian improvements with funding recommendation. Ensure that all the City s pedestrian facilities are in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Sidewalk Inventory Surveyed ± 14.1 miles of streets within Downtown subarea. Surveyed ± 68.9 miles of streets in arterials, collectors, and some local streets. Identified 246 missing segments. Inventoried 55% of the streets.

Sidewalk Inventory (Downtown Subarea, Arterials, Collectors) (Downtown Subarea, Arterials, Collectors) Missing Sidewalk (miles) Existing Sidewalk (miles) Total Surveyed Sidewalk (miles) 29.50 53.50 83 64% 36% Missing Sidewalk Existing Sidewalk

Proposed Ranking System Ranking Score = Attributes (Max. Score = 50 + Points) Proximity (Max. Score = 50 Points)

Paved Shoulder < 4' (minimum shoulder width = 4') 30 Maximum Attribute Score 50 Attributes (proposed) Attribute Criterion Score Assigned A. Missing sidewalk on both sides Conditions of missing segment: Paved Shoulder > = 4' with raised curbs 30 B. Missing sidewalk on one side Paved Shoulder > = 4' with no raised curbs 40 Paved Shoulder < 4' (minimum shoulder width = 4') 50 Conditions of missing segment: Paved Shoulder > = 4' with raised curbs 10 Paved Shoulder > = 4' with no raised curbs 20

Proximity (proposed) Proximity Criterion Score Assigned Street Classification: Arterial or Collector ( = 20 points); Local Access Street ( = 10 points) School Zones: Collision Data: Elementary School, Junior High School, High School, or School Property within ¼ mile range Per WSDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Collision Statistics within ¼ mile range Public Services (1): Downtown Area, Public Building, Community Center, Senior Center, or Clinic/Hospital within ¼ mile range Public Services (2): Transit Stop, Commercial Area, Post Office, or Park & Recreation within ¼ mile range Low Income Residence: Low Income Residence within ¼ mile range 20 ~ 10 10 Maximum Proximity Score 50 8 6 4 2

NE 188 th St (between Pop Keeney Stadium & 92 nd Ave NE) No sidewalks on either side Paved shoulder < 4 feet

Scoring Sample #1 South side of NE 188 th St Attribute Criterion Point Index Attribute Score A. Missing sidewalk on both sides Conditions of missing segment: Paved Shoulder > = 4' with C-Curbs Paved Shoulder > = 4' with no C-Curbs 40 Paved Shoulder < 4' (minimum shoulder width = 4') 50 B. Missing sidewalk on one side Conditions of missing segment: Paved Shoulder > = 4' with C-Curbs Paved Shoulder > = 4' with no C-Curbs 20 Paved Shoulder < 4' (minimum shoulder width = 4') 30 Proximity Criterion Point Index Proximity Score Street Classification: Arterial or Collector ( = 20 points) Local Access Street or Local Neighborhood Street ( = 10 points) School Zones (within 1/4 mile walk range): 10 Elementary School, Junior High School, High School, or School Property Collision Data (within 1/4 mile walk range): 8 Per WSDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Collision Statistics (12/1/2010~11/13/2013) Public Services (within 1/4 mile walk range): 6 Downtown Area, Public Building, Community Center, Senior Center, or Clinic/Hospital Public Services (within 1/4 mile walk range): 4 Transit Stop, Commercial Area, Post Office, or Park & Recreation Low Income Residence (within 1/4 mile walk range) X 2 Total Ranking Score 30 10 20 50 10 10 8 6 4 0 88

240 th St SE (between Meridian Ave S and 3rd Ave SE) Sidewalks on south side No paved shoulder on north side

Scoring Sample #2 North side of 240 th St SE Attribute Criterion Point Index Attribute Score A. Missing sidewalk on both sides Conditions of missing segment: Paved Shoulder > = 4' with C-Curbs Paved Shoulder > = 4' with no C-Curbs 40 Paved Shoulder < 4' (minimum shoulder width = 4') 50 B. Missing sidewalk on one side Conditions of missing segment: Paved Shoulder > = 4' with C-Curbs Paved Shoulder > = 4' with no C-Curbs 20 Paved Shoulder < 4' (minimum shoulder width = 4') 30 Proximity Criterion Point Index Proximity Score Street Classification: Arterial or Collector ( = 20 points) Local Access Street or Local Neighborhood Street ( = 10 points) School Zones (within 1/4 mile walk range): 10 Elementary School, Junior High School, High School, or School Property Collision Data (within 1/4 mile walk range): 8 Per WSDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Collision Statistics (12/1/2010~11/13/2013) Public Services (within 1/4 mile walk range): 6 Downtown Area, Public Building, Community Center, Senior Center, or Clinic/Hospital Public Services (within 1/4 mile walk range): 4 Transit Stop, Commercial Area, Post Office, or Park & Recreation Low Income Residence (within 1/4 mile walk range) X 2 Total Ranking Score 30 10 20 30 20 0 0 6 4 0 60

Self-Evaluation (Curb Ramps) Reviewed 833 curb ramp locations Attribute Criteria Slopes (cross, running, flare, counter, gutter, and landing slopes) Landing Width Grade Break Detectable Warning Surface (DWS) Obstruction Orientation Surface condition

Curb Ramp Inventory 2015 Curb Ramp Inventory 3% 2015 Curb Ramp Inventory ADA Non- Compliant Curb Ramps (each) ADA Compliant Curb Ramps (each) Nonexistent curb ramps (each) Total Surveyed Locations (each) 770 26 37 833 5% 92% ADA Non-Compliant Curb Ramps (each) ADA Compliant Curb Ramps (each) Non-existent curb ramps (each)

Summary of Sidewalk Program Conducted a self-evaluation of the sidewalk/curb ramp inventory. Proposed a ranking system to prioritize pedestrian facilities. Developed a missing sidewalk project improvement list based on the proposed ranking system.

Next Steps for Sidewalk Program Conduct public outreach to get citizens, including people with disabilities, involved in our sidewalk program. Provide a planning level cost estimate for each project identified. Apply for grants and implement the prioritized sidewalk projects. Develop a preliminary ADA Transition Plan of the pedestrian facilities.

Introduction Pedestrians are legitimate users of the transportation system and should be able to use this system safely and without unreasonable delay. Planners and engineers have a professional responsibility to plan, design, and install safe and convenient crossing facilities. Pedestrians are at risk whenever they cross the roadway. The degree of risk depends on: Complexity of the vehicular and pedestrian traffic patterns. Effectiveness of supplementary information provided about the crossing location, direction, and duration.

Crosswalk General Definition Crosswalk at an intersection is defined as the extension of the sidewalk or the shoulder across the intersection, regardless of whether it is marked or not.

Crosswalk Markings MUTCD Crosswalk markings provide guidance for pedestrians. Crosswalk markings also serve to alert road users of a pedestrian crossing point across roadways that are not controlled by traffic signals or stop signs.

The Law The operator of an approaching vehicle shall stop and remain stopped to allow a pedestrian or bicycle to cross the roadway within an unmarked or marked crosswalk. (RCW 46.61.235) No pedestrian or bicycle shall suddenly leave a curb and move into traffic so that the driver cannot stop. (RCW 46.61.235)

Two Crosswalk Types Pedestrian crosswalk School crosswalk

Pedestrian Crosswalk

School Crosswalk

Process for Pedestrian Crosswalk

Process for School Crosswalk

Crosswalk Liability There has been considerable controversy in the United States about whether marked crosswalks increase or decrease pedestrian safety at crossing locations that are not controlled by a traffic signal or stop sign.

Cost Estimate for Different Crosswalk Treatments There are a variety of treatments available to heighten motorists awareness of a crosswalk, increasing the level of safety for pedestrians at that crosswalk.

Pedestrian Warning Signs Placed on the approach and/or at the crossing Cost is $750

Rumble Strips Located on the approaches to crosswalks Cost is $650

Pedestrian Crossing Pavement Stencils Located on the approach to the crosswalk Cost is $400

In-Pavement Flashing Lights Activated by push-button or automatic pedestrian detectors Cost is $22,000

Variations of Overhead Pedestrian Crosswalk Signs May be warning or regulatory and may be illuminated and/or convey a message when activated crosswalk lighting Cost is $45,000

Raised Medians or Pedestrian/Refuge Islands

Flat-Topped Speed Humps Sometimes called speed tables, pedestrians may cross the street on the raised flat top Cost is $40,000

Traffic-Calming Measures Includes curb extensions and lane reductions to reduce crossing distance Cost is $30,000

High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk Signals (HAWK) Only added at pedestrian crossings when warranted Cost is $150,000

Rectangular Rapid Flashing (RRFP) A push button activates flashing beacons at the crosswalk Cost is $14,000