Gulf of Alaska Keeper

Similar documents
Gulf of Alaska Keeper

Southern Montague Island 2012 Marine Debris Cleanup Final Report

Final Report on Removing MD from Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Beaches in Chris Pallister Gulf of Alaska Keeper.

Final Report on Removing MD from Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Beaches in Chris Pallister Gulf of Alaska Keeper.

Chris Pallister Gulf of Alaska Keeper. February 15, Guiding the landing craft to the beach in South Twin Bay for loading

Gulf of Alaska Keeper

NINGALOO MARINE DEBRIS REPORT

Keep it Clean Report 2018

Marine Debris from Land to Sea: Holistic Characterization, Reduction and Education Efforts in New Hampshire

Death by Plastic The Great Pacific Garbage Patch

Nome Harbor Page 2 of 12

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

Fishing for Energy Fund Project Summaries

M/V SELENDANG AYU. Unalaska Island, Alaska

Great Pacific Garbage Patch an example of growing plastic pollution

Coastal Harbors and Waterways, NC (Shallow Draft Navigation) (O&M)

Tsunamis. Tsunamis COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM TSUNAMIS

CCAMLR. Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources

RE: Hurricane Matthew Beach Damage Assessment and Recommendations [CSE 2416]

Oceans Humans both depend on it and threaten it with their activities

NOLS Alumni Trip Sea Kayaking Prince William Sound, Alaska July 23 29, 2017

Environmental Protection on the Gold Coast of Queensland, Australia. 1. What is the appeal of the Gold Coast to tourists?

Marine Ecosystems. Aquatic Ecosystems Section 2

Top of the Ocean Mat. Created by Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies in partnership with the Washed Ashore Project

Emergency Coastal Protection Works Practical Lessons For The Future From The Past

Delaware Chapter Surfrider Foundation - Indian River Inlet Monitoring

Juneau Douglas Harbor

REGION 2. Eysturoy (north)

Coastal Harbors and Waterways, NC (Shallow Draft Navigation) (O&M)

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, 12270, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2012

Reading informational texts. Directions: Today you will be taking a short test using what you have learned about reading nonfiction texts.

CORL Update. July June By Mike King

Long Beach Island Holgate Spit Little Egg Inlet Historical Evolution Introduction Longshore Transport Map, Survey and Photo Historic Sequence

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 15 Earth Science, 12e Tarbuck/Lutgens

Spring in British Columbia s Great Bear Rainforest Edition. Explore the islands and beaches of the Great Bear Sea. Interact.

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2009

A New Survey Method to Determine Plastic Rubbish in Port Phillip Bay,

There are no paved roads to

FINAL REPORT DERELICT FISHING GEAR IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL PROJECT PORT SUSAN

Bear Cove Coastline Reestablishment

OYSTER GROWOUT RESEARCH Testing Alternate Gear. Raymond RaLonde Alaska Sea Grant Marine Advisory Program ASGA Meeting Nov.

1-44. SITKA HARBOR, ALASKA (Western Channel, Crescent Bay Basin, Channel Rock Breakwaters) (CWIS NOS , 16840, 10322, 55030, 13787)

Looking for Clues. Overview: Targeted Alaska Grade Level Expectations: Objectives: Materials: Science Basics: Grades K-4

Natural Bridges Field Trip Activity

Ninilchik Harbor Page 2 of 11

Steelhead Society of BC. Thompson River Watershed Restoration and Enhancement Project #4 Nicola River Bank Stabilization and Enhancement Project

Unit 11 Lesson 2 How Does Ocean Water Move? Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

Report: 2016 International Coastal Cleanup by VESS

Commercial Dungeness Crab Newsletter

Figure 1, Chart showing the location of the Breach at Old Inlet and sensors deployed in Great South Bay.

Eastern Shore Islands Area of Interest Community Newsletter

The Composition of Seawater

WCMRC Technical Manual. Waste Management Tactics

Girl Scouts Patriots Trail Council

Exxon Valdez Runs Aground in March 2014, by The Associated Press

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Non Crude Marine Vessels Group Mission

HARBOUR SEDIMENTATION - COMPARISON WITH MODEL

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the Matagorda Bay System

BookletChart. Sand Key to Rebecca Shoal NOAA Chart A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters

COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS. 454 lecture 12

County of Santa Barbara Permit Option Analysis Goleta Beach JULY 13, 2017

1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED

FINAL REPORT DERELICT FISHING GEAR REMOVAL PROJECT PORT GARDNER

The Impact on Great South Bay of the Breach at Old Inlet Charles N. Flagg School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University

Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project FERC No Appendix C. Derelict Gear Monitoring Plan

MARINE LITTER PROJECT STOPPING MARINE BEBRIS

1-22. KETCHIKAN, ALASKA (Thomas and Bar Point Basins) (CWIS NOS & 87071) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2007

Coastal and marine recreation in New England is ingrained in the region s economic and

2,500 sea oats planted on North Beach dune in an effort to stabil...

Redondo Beach Boat Launch Ramp Facility

Chapter 10 Lecture Outline. The Restless Oceans

British Columbia s. Johnstone Strait & Blackfish Sound. Encounter Orcas, humpback whales, dolphins, porpoises, seals and sea lions

Earth Science Chapter 16 Section 3 Review

The Surge of the Storm By Margaret Olsen and Katie Greganti

Ketchikan Harbors Thomas Basin and Bar Point Harbor

Our Council s Own: Oceanography Cadette/Senior/Ambassador Badge

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the San Antonio Bay System

Synthesis of marine debris modeling and observations: recent progress in understanding and applications

Ocean Light II Adventures

WIND SPEED LENGTH OF TIME WIND BLOWS (Duration) DISTANCE OVER WHICH IT BLOWS (Fetch)

영어 2 YBM( 신 ) 4 과기출문제모음

RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE FARALLON PATROL V5 April 2014

NYS Coastal Waters. Water Resources of NYS: THE NATURE of the COASTAL ZONE. NYS Coastal Waters. NYS Coastal Atlas. Coastal Zone Management 10/10/2014

Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution Operation, Inspection, Maintenance and Decommissioning Strategy Bute Cumbrae Cable Replacement

Alaska Sustainable Salmon Fund Statement of Work

Plot the Path into the Harbor

British Columbia s Great Bear Rainforest

Volunteer and Internships Programs ECUADOR

Surfrider s Recreational Use Survey and Marine Spatial Planning in Washington State. Gus Gates- WA Policy Manager

Rising Tide Oyster Company 2.0 Acre Bellamy Site Marine Aquaculture License Application

Sea Views SEACAMS. month s edition. In this. Business aboard the RV Prince Madog What do seals do underwater? All aboard the RV Prince Madog

THE INEVITABLE RIPPLE 2ND OF APRIL TSUNAMI

Unalaska Navigation Channel Improvements

APRIL 2017 COMMERCIAL SHRIMPING REGULATIONS

Implications of proposed Whanganui Port and lower Whanganui River dredging

Chapter 12 Notes - Food from the Oceans The Fishing Industry

Alaska Sustainable Salmon Fund Statement of Work

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

Chapter. The Dynamic Ocean

WHEREAS, the ordinance will not create excessive additional requirements for public facilities and services at public cost.

Transcription:

Gulf of Alaska Keeper EVOSTC Harbor Protection and Marine Restoration Marine Debris Removal Grant Prince William Sound Tsunami Debris Amendment By Chris Pallister Team Leader 907-345-0166 chris@alaska.net December 19, 2012 1

Table of Contents Background Information 3-10 Proposed PWS Tsunami Debris Cleanup Amendment 10-12 PWS Tsunami Debris Removal Budget FY 2013 12-13 PWS Tsunami Debris Removal Budget Narrative 13-14 2

Background Information In early 2012, Gulf of Alaska Keeper (GoAK) commenced work on a multi-year marine debris cleanup, EVOSTC Project #12120116, Contract # IHP-12-057. During the summer of 2012, the EVOSTC-funded cleanup work focused on removing decades of built up deposits of marine debris from southwest Prince William Sound (PWS) beaches. While not the focus of the 2012 EVOSTC project, by late April of 2012, it became clear that massive quantities of marine debris emanating from the Japanese tsunami of March 2011 had made its way across the northern Pacific to the shores of Montague Island, Kayak Island, and other Gulf of Alaska beaches. By June 2012, the tsunami debris had penetrated Hinchinbrook Entrance and had begun to disperse throughout portions of PWS. By mid-summer large quantities of Styrofoam, urethane insulation and other foamed-plastic debris had washed ashore on many islands within PWS. In late June 2012, GoAK re-cleaned 14 PWS beaches during an annual marine debris monitoring project. Data collected during the monitoring project established that tsunami debris had already heavily impacted central PWS beaches in the Naked Island group in central PWS, as far west as beaches on Applegate Island to south of Main Bay, and beaches along the northeastern half of the Knight Island archipelago. 2012 marine debris monitoring data shows that both the amount and composition of annual marine debris deposition in PWS increased remarkably from previous years. The annual deposition of Styrofoam and other foamed plastic debris shot up by an average of 7-fold by weight. See figures 1and 2. Japanese plastic bottles and containers holding a wide array of chemicals washed into PWS. Fuel tanks and chemical drums were found on many beaches. Many varieties of Japanese oyster-culture and commercial fishing floats and buoys have lodged on beaches throughout PWS. Many of these floats are made of Styrofoam that quickly shreds along rugged PWS beaches and the bits are then scattered throughout the inter-tidal ecosystem. Japanese tsunami debris Styrofoam and hard plastic floats recovered from PWS beaches. 3

Figure 1. Increase in Styrofoam marine debris in 2012 compared to previous 5 years. 4

Combined changes in amount of high-windage MD 2011 to 2012, pre- and post-tsunami, on two Gore Point monitoring sites and two Prince William Sound sites. Pre-tsunami in blue, pot-tsunami in red. Pre tsunami 2011 Post tsunami 2012 Control: Low windage, current driven debris Figure 2. Wind driven tsunami debris compared to low-windage rope and line control, 2011-2012. 5

Styrofoam tsunami debris on Sphinx Island, PWS, ADEC Cleanup, September 2012. Japanese tsunami Styrofoam, bottles, fishing floats and chemical drum, Eleanor Island, ADEC cleanup, September 2012. 6

To ascertain the extent of the tsunami debris problem, during July and August of 2012, Airborne Technology Inc. (ATI) conducted an aerial survey of Alaska s coast. ATI s survey documented extensive deposits of tsunami debris from the southernmost tip of Southeast Alaska to the Alaska Peninsula. ATI s survey determined that the shores of Montague and Kayak islands contain the heaviest deposits of tsunami debris. The extensive fields of tsunami debris on Montague Island include the beaches on the three northernmost points of Montague Island. ATI also documented tsunami debris throughout PWS including on Knight, Eleanor, Ingot, Entrance, and Sphinx islands. Tsunami Debris Deposits Along Gulf of Alaska Coast, Airborne Technology Inc., ADEC In September of 2012, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) submitted a Request for Proposals to remove tsunami debris from PWS pursuant to a small National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration grant. GoAK submitted a proposal, with 3 alternative project sites, prioritized by the amount of debris present but each dependent on weather conditions for access. GoAK s proposal was accepted and the cleanup work started September 22 and ended October 2. The first priority cleanup site included the three northern Montague Island points but weather prevented cleanup work in that area. The cleanup then focused on the second priority site on the east side of Knight Island from the Bay of Isles to the northern tip of Eleanor Island, including, Ingot, Entrance and Sphinx islands. See Chart 1. Although ATI s survey had documented a considerable amount of tsunami debris along the second priority shoreline, the realities on the ground were much worse than the survey indicated. See photos page 6. Information gathered during the ADEC tsunami debris cleanup reinforced the aerial survey data which had already clearly demonstrated that a massive influx of tsunami debris had flooded PWS. 7

ADEC 2012 Cleanup Priority Tsunami Debris Collector Beaches The beaches in the northern Knight Island vicinity are second priority beaches and the beaches in the Naked Island vicinity are third priority beaches. #3 #2 # 1 Chart 1, ADEC September 2012 tsunami debris cleanup priority beaches. Priority 1 and 3 beaches were not cleaned. 8

Much of the debris encountered during the ADEC tsunami cleanup was hidden from the ATI aerial survey by shoreline topography which included boulders as large as houses, crevices, sea caves, overhanging cliffs, trees, and brush. A considerable amount of the tsunami debris was in fact funneled and concentrated into dense pockets of debris concealed by the overhanging shoreline structure. However, there were Styrofoam, urethane and other foamed plastic pieces scattered along nearly all of the shoreline cleaned during this project. Severe weather hampered the ADEC project, but during this short cleanup, 67 cubic yards of tsunami debris were picked up. Approximately 70% of the debris was comprised of Styrofoam, urethane or other foamed plastic products. Given the short period of time available for this project, and the near impossibility of doing so, countless numbers of beads from shredded chunks of Styrofoam and degraded urethane were not removed. However, by removing the larger pieces of Styrofoam, other foamed plastic, and all the other debris, a significant amount of further degradation and environmental damage was prevented. Drums and containers of products ranging from shampoos to industrial chemicals were removed from the shoreline. Hundreds of fishing floats and dozens of large oyster-culture buoys were recovered. This astounding amount of tsunami debris had accumulated in just a few months. All of the beaches cleaned during the ADEC project had been thoroughly cleaned in the summer of 2011, and a few of them again in June 2012. However, by late September of 2012 they were all covered with tsunami debris. Degraded Styrofoam, urethane and other Japanese tsunami debris on a PWS beaches. 9

Birds and land mammals are eating the foam tsunami debris and other plastic with unknown consequences. It is likely that fish consume the Styrofoam beads and other plastic particles that wash off beaches. Furthermore, given the amount of tsunami debris that has inundated PWS, and the fact that Styrofoam and other foamed plastic is susceptible to shredding and then being disbursed throughout the shoreline environment, GoAK believes that an intense effort to remove as much as the PWS tsunami debris as possible should be made in the summer of 2013. For these reasons, we submit the following proposed amendment to our EVOSTC marine debris removal grant. Proposed PWS Tsunami Debris Cleanup Amendment GoAK s current EVOSTC marine debris cleanup grant includes two additional seasons of cleanup work following the 2012 season s work in southwest PWS and along the Gulf of Alaska Coast from Port Bainbridge to Resurrection Bay. The cleanup work previously approved for the summer of 2013 was to occur in the Barren Islands and for the summer of 2014 on the Gulf of Alaska side of Montague Island in the Patton Bay/Jeannie Cove area. This multi-year grant and proposed cleanup work were conceived and awarded before the Japanese tsunami occurred, long before anybody considered the consequences of such a disaster to PWS. Because of the overwhelming tsunami debris damage in PWS, GoAK proposes that the EVOSTC grant be modified to provide an additional season of cleanup work so that the marine debris cleanup team can focus on removing tsunami debris from the greater PWS area during the summer of 2013. We further propose that the two seasons of previously approved work be each delayed one year so that the Barren Island project would now occur in 2014 and the Patton Bay/Jeannie Cove project occur in 2015. GoAK anticipates that there may be funding available from the Japanese government and the U.S. federal government to help address the tsunami debris problem. Nonetheless, at this time there is no clear idea of how much funding will be available or when it will be available. In addition, indications are that the Governor of Alaska will not request a state appropriation to help address a problem he considers a federal issue. However, if any of the above mentioned funding sources become available, GoAK believes that that funding should be used to address the massive tsunami debris deposits along the Gulf of Alaska shorelines of Montague and Kayak islands. They will require an industrial-scale cleanup approach. Those remote and inaccessible shorelines will be incredibly difficult and very expensive to adequately clean, the cost of which would require substantial federal and/or state funding to adequately address. Extrapolating from the short ADEC tsunami debris cleanup in September 2012, and from GoAK s 11 seasons of marine debris work in PWS, we estimate that to clean the entire interior PWS shoreline directly exposed to tsunami debris will take our cleanup crew 75 days. See Chart 2 for shorelines needing cleaning. Over two hundred miles of shoreline within PWS are now known to have significant amounts of tsunami debris on them. Many of these shorelines face the east or southeast, such as those on the Knight Island archipelago, the direction from which the prevailing wind blows and the currents from Hinchinbrook Entrance flush into PWS. However, once debris is swept into PWS through Hinchinbrook entrance, currents and storms then disperse it as far west as beaches on southern Culross Island and along the mainland north and south of Main Bay. Debris has also swept south down Montague Straits, impacting Green Island and the north and east side of Latouche Island. The Fox Farm Harbor area at the southern extreme of PWS on Elrington Island has also captured a significant amount of tsunami debris. 10

All of these interior PWS shorelines have previously been cleaned by GoAK, some of them repeatedly, over the past 11 years. However, in the past, we removed decades worth of plastic marine debris accumulation, much of it heavy nets, lines and other commercial fishing debris which were difficult, time consuming and expensive to extract. The tsunami debris on the other hand is generally lightweight, lying on the surface and, therefore, relatively easy to remove, with the exception of the countless bits of foam. Chart 2. PWS shorelines with known tsunami debris deposits. 11

Because of GoAK s intimate familiarity with the proposed PWS cleanup area, we are confident that we can thoroughly clean it without resorting to specialized and expensive equipment such as large landing craft or helicopters. GoAK has received a grant from the Chugach National Forest RAC that will help pay fuel and debris disposal costs for marine debris cleanup work in PWS in 2013. In addition, GoAK s 12 th Annual Volunteer Cleanup will occur May 17-19 on the eastern side of the Knight Island archipelago. A dozen donated vessels with up to 100 volunteers will spend several days picking up tsunami debris and caching it for GoAK s cleanup crew to retrieve. Volunteers will also help clean the 14 PWS marine debris monitoring beaches as they do each summer. With the Chugach National Forest s grant and ongoing volunteer assistance, EVOSTC s contribution will be highly leveraged. GoAK s crew will remove all accumulated tsunami debris from interior PWS beaches with the exception of large items such as boats or portions of buildings, or hazardous material. However, hazardous material will be identified by our Hazmat-trained crew, secured, and if safely possible, removed from the active surf zone for later recovery by proper authorities. GoAK will not transport or dispose of hazardous material. All plastic debris, including foamed plastic such as Styrofoam, will be shipped to Central Alaska Recyclers for recycling and disposal. All intact hard fishing floats will be given to commercial fishermen, oyster farmers, or anybody that might have use for them. All other usable items such as drums, fuel tanks and buckets are similarly disposed of. Removal of the tsunami debris is generally a simple matter of picking it up by hand, stuffing it into a garbage bag if small enough, and then eventually transferring it to a landing craft for shipment back to Whittier. However, some debris is entangled in branches and brush or partly buried by sand and gravel. Then it becomes a greater problem to remove. Gas-powered vacuums (reverse leaf blowers) may at times be used to vacuum up large quantities of crushed Styrofoam. Once the landing-craft loads of debris reach Whittier, the debris will be transferred to 40-yard dumpsters for shipment to Central Alaska Recyclers in Anchorage. During this project, we anticipate shipping a landing craft load of debris about 45-cubic yards to Whittier every 5 to 6 days. We estimate that twelve to fifteen loads of tsunami debris, or as much as 650-cubic yards, will be removed from PWS beaches during this project. PWS Tsunami Debris Removal Budget FY 2013 Budget Category (e.g. personnel, supplies, contractual, etc.) Personnel -CACS (public outreach) -CCF (public outreach) -Volunteer Cleanup -Management/Logistics Travel -Volunteer transport -CACS (public outreach) -Vessel Charter -CCF Instructor EVOSTC Funds 25,50 4,00 2,50 8,80 1,50 Matching Contributions Total Expense 82,00 32,80 144,30 1,30 14,10 Nature (cash or in-kind) And Source of Match In-kind-Volunteer labor In-kind-GoAK Board Cash-Volunteers Equipment -Vol. cleanup vessels 80,00 80,00 In-kind- Donated vessel owners Supplies -Fuel, Research Project 2,00 12

-Fuel, PWS Cleanup -Watermaker filters -Garbage bags Contractual -Contract Crew -Work Vessels -Debris Disposal -Liability Insurance -CCF (public outreach) -MCAF (documentary film) -MCAF (MD Tide Book) 180,00 195,00 1,50 1,00 11,40 10,00 20,00 50 90 23,40 15,00 7,00 -UAA/W&M research 420,90 Accounting/Bookkeeping 2,00 2,00 Cash-GoAK Total 443,20 241,50 684,700 Cash-Chugach Nat. Forest/Private Cash-GoAK In-kind- ALPAR Cash-Chugach Nat. Forest/Private Cash-GoAK PWS Tsunami Debris Removal Budget Narrative While this amendment at first seemed to be a simple swap with the approved 2013 Barren Island cleanup project, there are several EVOSTC-funded components of the Barren Island project that, while related, are not directly involved with the actual marine debris cleanup activities. Those components of the 2013 project are already contracted. They include the Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies public outreach and marine debris curriculum development, the Chugach Children s Forest Service PWS Expedition, the Marine Conservation Alliance Foundation s production of a marine-debris documentary film and marinedebris-prevention themed tide books. All of these related contractual activities have been included in this amended budget, but are not be described in detail in the budget narrative because they are the identical activities funded in the pre-existing approved 2013 budget. Personnel Personnel costs for the Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies marine-debris prevention public outreach and curriculum development will be $25,500. The Chugach Children s Forest Service PWS Expedition personnel costs are $4,000. Over 4000 hours of volunteer time will be donated to PWS tsunami debris cleanup projects in 2013, an in-kind donation of $82,000. GoAK s board will donate 1600 hours in 2013 to organize, manage, and provide logistic for the 2013 cleanup work, and in-kind donation of $32,800. Travel Volunteers for the 2013 cleanup projects will pay for their own travel, tunnel and parking costs, a matching cash donation valued at $1,300. A charter vessel for the Chugach Forest PWS Expedition is $8,800. Travel for the Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies Staff will cost $2,500. Travel for the Chugach Children s Forest Service instructor is $1,500. Equipment Twelve vessels will be donated for 3 days for the 2013 PWS Volunteer Cleanup and two vessels for 8 days for the PWS marine debris monitoring project, an in-kind donation of $80,000. 13

Supplies Fuel for the UAA/College of William and Mary marine debris plastic toxicity study will cost $2,000. $20,000 of fuel for the PWS tsunami debris cleanup will be purchased with matching Chugach Forest Service RAC and private cash grants. GoAK will purchase filters and other reverse osmosis supplies necessary to make fresh water for the cleanup crew, a matching cash expenditure of $500. ALPAR will donate 3000 heavy duty debris collection bags, an in-kind donation of $900. Contractual An 8-man tsunami debris cleanup crew will for 75 days clean over two hundred miles of PWS shoreline in the summer of 2013. At $2,400 per day for 75 days, the cleanup crew will cost $180,000. Three work vessels including a 54-foot crew vessel, a 32-foot landing craft, a 24-foot aluminum work boat, and 4 rigid-hull inflatables with outboards will be used to support the cleanup project. At $2,600 per day for 75 days, the cleanup vessels will cost $195,000. Debris transport by truck to Anchorage and tipping fees for this cleanup project are projected to be $15,000 which will be paid with a Chugach National Forest RAC grant and private donations. GoAK will purchase a general liability insurance policy for $7,000. The Chugach Children s Forest Service outreach instructor contract is $1,500. The Marine Conservation Alliance Foundation s contract for the marine debris documentary film is $1,000 and their contract for the design and production of tide books is $11,400. The 2013 University of Alaska/College of William and Mary marine debris plastic toxicity researcher contracts are $10,000. The total cash cost of the 2013 amended project $489,000. We request that EVOSTC fund $443,200 of the total project costs. Matching cash contributions from other donors will total $45,800. In addition to the cash necessary for this project, volunteers will contribute at least 4000 hours to remove tsunami debris from PWS during the summer of 2013. That is an in-kind donation of $82,000. Volunteers will also donate the cost of their travel to and from the point of departure for the volunteer cleanup, including fuel, tunnel and parking fees. This is a cash contribution of $1,300. During the 3-day volunteer cleanup 12 vessels will be donated to support the cleanup work. This is an in-kind donation of $52,000. Two vessels will be donated to the 8-day monitoring cleanup which will also be removing tsunami debris from 14 beaches throughout PWS. That is an in-kind donation of $28,000. ALPAR will donate 3000 large heavy-duty debris-collection bags, an in-kind donation valued at $900. Total in-kind contributions to support the 2013 PWS tsunami debris cleanup will total at least $195,700. 14