The FIFA/Coca-Cola World Ranking

Similar documents
How are points calculated in the FIFA World Ranking?

FIFA Football Men and Women

FIFA Football Men and Women

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL FEDERATION (FIFA) Football

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL FEDERATION (FIFA) Football

FIFA Foe Fun! Mark Kozek! Whittier College. Tim Chartier! Davidson College. Michael Mossinghoff! Davidson College

Official Licensed Publication of FIFA

Project Title: Overtime Rules in Soccer and their Effect on Winning Percentages

We are pleased to endose the minutes of this year's FIFA Congress, which was held in Budapest, Hungary, on 24 and 25 May 2012.

ELITE PLAYERS PERCEPTION OF FOOTBALL PLAYING SURFACES

12-22 December Abu Dhabi & Al Ain

TO THE MEMBER ASSOCIATIONS OF FIFA

III Jornada: Seminario de Derecho del Fútbol Nacional e Internacional. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

FIFA Football Development

Learning English Through Football

SAFA NATIONAL TEAM ACTIVITIES

Feasibility study on the increase of the number of teams from 32 to 48 in the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022

WORLD CUP DATA ANALYSIS:

FIFA World Ranking. Semester Thesis. Lukas Affolter.

Youth Olympic Football Tournaments Singapore Statistical Kit

Development Strategy. This is Stepstone Enterprises Development Strategy for Italian Soccer Academy in the Americas

REFEREEING EXPERTS WORKSHOP REPORT APRIL 2017 KUALA LUMPUR

match schedule fifa A77F92A E7A51DDD412F849CEF Match Schedule Fifa 1 / 6

SAFA NATIONAL TEAM ACTIVITIES

Football Rules How To Play World Cup Games 2010

SAFA NATIONAL TEAM ACTIVITIES

The World at Their Feet: A Combined Historical Ranking of Nations Competing in Football and Futsal

195 engaging and releasing club. 479 only releasing club. 166 all sides. 8,025 only player 10,282

Protokoll des 62. FIFA-Kongresses und FIFA-Veranstaltungskalender 2013

INTRODUCTION 2. History 3. Winners at a glance 3 STATISTICS 4

Football bodies. The IFAB The International Football Association Board. The governing body responsible for football throughout the world

Tie Breaking Procedure

COMPETITIONS & LANGUAGES

Tournament Format. Knock-Out - April 22, 2017

Total transfers: 577. Total spending: USD 493,235. Transfers and spending. Introduction

Journal of Coaching Education

WORLD RANKING SYSTEM In Force: 01/01/2018

2016 FUTSAL STATE CHAMPIONSHIPS COMPETITION REGULATIONS

251 engaging and releasing club. 625 only releasing club. 236 all sides. 9,757 only player. 12,604 transfers

Scorekeeper/Announcer Training

IFCPF Strategic Plan

NORTH FORELAND REGIONAL BADMINTON ASSOCIATION

Power-Pairing Rules for the 2018 World Schools Debating Championships

FIFA$Under$17$World$Cup$India$2017$

1. OVERVIEW OF METHOD

2018 FIFA World Cup : profile of qualified teams

Regulations of the Olympic Football Tournaments

BOXFORD SOCCER PROGRAM OPERATING POLICIES JUNE 1999 (UPDATED 2016)

2018 PGA PROFESSIONAL PLAYER OF THE YEAR presented by OMEGA 2018 SENIOR PGA PROFESSIONAL PLAYER OF THE YEAR presented by OMEGA

Referees and Judges Examination

Road Traffic Estimates

COMPILED BY : - GAUTAM SINGH STUDY MATERIAL SPORTS Football - Overview

North and South Football Tournament League Automatic Qualification Information and Tiebreaker Procedures

REFEREE SIGNALS. Direct free kick. Caution. Sending Off

Mini Guide. Fédération Internationale de Football Association. Boston Invitational Model United Nations XVI February 10-12, 2017 // bosmun.

Tournament Regulations FIFA LogicaCMG World Cup St Andrews, Scotland 2006

PROFICIENCY BADGE-KHEL (SPORTS)

You can still join the game after the tournament has started, but you will not score any points for past rounds which you have missed.

BRACKETING 3-TEAM BRACKETS:

2019 SENIOR PGA PROFESSIONAL PLAYER OF THE YEAR

U9 12 Co-Operative (Co-Op) League Bylaws BRYC, FPYC & BAC Spring 2015

POINTS BASED SYSTEM GOVERNING BODY ENDORSEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR PLAYERS 2016/2017 SEASON

PLAYING RULES & FORMAT

Chapter 7 - Round Robin Competition

FAW REGIONS CUP THE RULES OF THE REGIONS CUP COMPETITION 2016/2018

STEPHEN KIMBROUGH DAMJAN ŠTRUS SHOOT TO THRILL

PART III SECTION 1A APPENDIX 6. WORLD RANKING SYSTEM [Note: Competition Regulation 30]

The Players. 1. Number of players

Part F: Rules Regarding Suspensions for Serious Foul Play, Violent Conduct, Spitting

UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE /18 SEASON MATCH PRESS KITS

LITITZ SUMMER SHOWCASE RULES AND REGULATIONS

REGULATIONS. Youth Olympic Futsal Tournaments Buenos Aires 2018

TACTICAL. Defensive Team Play. The USA Hockey Coaching Education Program is presented by REVISED 6/15

The FIFA Universe. Massive scale, massive influence, massive corruption

Regulations of the UEFA/CAF Meridian Cup

International Wheelchair Rugby Federation. World Ranking Regulations

Scoring a Long Series: Alternative Scoring Systems for Long Series

UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE /17 SEASON MATCH PRESS KITS

Annex 17 Individual FMJD Competitions The World Championship (all categories) page 1

UTAR Sports Carnival 2017 RULES & REGULATIONS

UEFA EUROPA LEAGUE /17 SEASON MATCH PRESS KITS

BIDDING REGISTRATION

UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE /18 SEASON MATCH PRESS KITS

CIES Football Observatory Monthly Report Issue 33 - March A comparative analysis of club-trained players in Europe. 1.

FIFA ROADMAP FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2009 WORLD ANTI-DOPING CODE

Australian National Sikh Sports & Cultural Council (ANSSACC)

UNDER-21 CHAMPIONSHIP /17 SEASON MATCH PRESS KITS

There will be eight (8) substates with 6 teams in each substate.

REGULATIONS. FIFA U-20 Women s World Cup France 2018

COLORADO SOCCER ASSOCIATION. League Rules and Procedures

UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE /16 SEASON MATCH PRESS KITS

UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE /15 SEASON MATCH PRESS KITS

Artificial Soccer Turf What Shoes to Wear?

UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE /16 SEASON MATCH PRESS KITS

UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE /15 SEASON MATCH PRESS KITS

Sport and Europe : an analysis by social sciences. William GASPARINI University Professor, Jean Monnet Chair Faculty of sport sciences Strasbourg

NORTHERN SUN INTERCOLLEGIATE CONFERENCE WOMEN S SOCCER HANDBOOK EDITION (August 2018)

2016 FIFA REFORMS BUILDING A STRONGER FIFA FEBRUAR 2016

FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION OF WALES

COLORADO SOCCER ASSOCIATION. Rules and Procedures

Transcription:

The FIFA/Coca-Cola World Ranking Since its introduction in August 1993, the FIFA World Ranking has become a regular part of international sports reports and a useful indicator for FIFA's member associations to find out where their respective teams stand in world football s pecking order and how they are progressing. It is by design the subject of countless animated debates. Following on from minor changes in 1998, the ranking has been comprehensively revised this year. The ranking is calculated on the basis of typical factors such as match result (win, draw or defeat), importance of match (competitive or friendly match), strength of opponents (calculated using the team s position in the ranking) and regional strength, which is gauged by the results of teams from the respective confederation in the last three final competitions of the FIFA World Cup. Next year, the official FIFA website, FIFA.com, will offer an online tool that will make it possible to carry out hypothetical calculations for your team. BASIC CRITERIA Factors for world ranking Matches Result Importance of match Strength of opponent All international A matches Win Draw Defeat (3 1 0 points) 1 (friendly match) to 4 (FIFA World Cup ) Position in world ranking (no. 1 = 2.00, no. 30 = 1.70, no. 118 = 0.82 etc.) Formula: [200 - Position] / 100 Regional strength Based on results in last three FIFA World Cups (wins per confederation per match) Period assessed Last four years, gradual decline in importance of results: 100% - 50%-30%-20% Number of matches considered per year Average points gained from all matches in last 12 months (minimum: 5 matches) In focus What counts towards the ranking? The results of all international A matches contested by FIFA member associations are taken into account in the world ranking. The matches of an association s youth teams or other representative sides have no influence. The FIFA Women s World Ranking uses a separate system to determine the relative standings of women s national teams. Win, draw or defeat The result of each match is given central importance by using the following customary points system: Win Draw Defeat 3 points 1 point 0 points To ensure that the formula is not only fair but also simple, matches that are decided by a penalty shoot-out (which are considered draws under normal rules) result in the winning team receiving two points and the losing team one point. Importance of match While World Cup matches carry a greater weighting than friendly fixtures to reflect their importance, it is important to acknowledge the importance of friendlies (and small regional tournaments) because they make it 50% of all the matches evaluated (see chart below for statistics for 2002-2005). IP-590_04E_WRlong.doc_07/05 1/4

Breakdown of matches by status 50% Friendly Competitive 50% The status of matches in different competitions is reflected by the following weighting multipliers: Friendly 1.0 World Cup qualifier and continental qualifier 2.5 Continental final competition and FIFA Confederations Cup 3.0 World Cup final competition 4.0 Strength of opponent The opponents ranking is taken into account using the formula [200 ranking position]/ 100. Only the team at the top of the ranking will be assigned the value 2.00 (teams ranked 150 th and below are assigned the minimum weighting of 0.50). Example 1: the team that is 30 th in the ranking: [200 30] / 100 = 1.7 - the team is assigned the weighting of 1.70 Example 2: the team that is 85 th in the ranking: [200 85] / 100 = 1.15 - the team is assigned the weighting of 1.15 Example 3: the team that is 122 nd in the ranking: [200-122] / 100 = 0.78 - the team assigned the weighting of 0.78 Regional strength The weighting of confederation strength plays a crucial role because around 85% of all matches played involve two teams from the same confederation and a weighting has to be used to make it possible to measure the matches within one confederation against those within another confederation (see chart below showing the statistics for 2002-2005). IP-590_04E_WRlong.doc_07/05 2/4

16% Regional Intercontinental 84% Calculating confederation weightings The confederations' weighting are calculated based on the number of wins the representatives of a confederation in the final competitions of the last three World Cups have recorded against teams representing the other confederations. For example, the more times that AFC teams beat teams from other confederations, the higher the weighting for the AFC. For statistical reasons, the lowest possible weighting is 0.85 (weakest confederation) and the highest is 1.0 (strongest confederation). Confederations from which no teams have qualified for the World Cup finals (OFC) will be assigned the weighting of the weakest confederation. This results in the following weightings (after the 2006 FIFA World Cup ): UEFA: 1.0 // CONMEBOL: 0.98 // CONCACAF: 0.85 // AFC: 0.85 // CAF: 0.85 // OFC: 0.85 Period assessed Matches played during the last four years (48 months) are taken into account in the ranking. The considerable reduction in value of less recent matches ensures that a team s latest successes have a much greater influence than earlier matches and the ranking therefore always reflects the latest developments in world football. Results during the last 12 months count in full, those from the previous year count half, while games played up to three and four years earlier have much less significant (100% - 50% - 30% - 20%). Multiplication factor To ensure that ranking points are always whole numbers, the final ranking points figure is always multiplied by 100. Annexe Table 1: calculating ranking points for year Number of matches Team A Team B Team C Team D Match 1 150 0 - - Match 2 0 570 - - Match 3 50 190 - - Match 4 600 0 - - Match 5 504-0 - Match 6 0-547 - Match 7 168-182 - Match 8 2016-0 Match 9 338 - - 0 IP-590_04E_WRlong.doc_07/05 3/4

Match 10 - - 1296 0 Match 11 - - 433 630 Total number of matches 9 4 6 3 Total points gained 3826 760 2458 630 Ranking points (teams must play a minimum of 5 matches) 425 152 410 126 IP-590_04E_WRlong.doc_07/05 4/4

Table 2: calculating ranking points per match In the following example, the formula for calculating the ranking points gained is illustrated using a number of examples with the following hypothetical teams: Team A is in 10 th place in the ranking and is a member of confederation X (weighting factor of confederation X = 1.0); Team B is in 165 th place in the ranking and is a member of confederation X (weighting factor of confederation X = 1.0); Team C is in 25 th place in the ranking and is a member of confederation Y (weighting factor of confederation Y = 0.92); Team D is in 80 th place in the ranking and is a member of confederation Z (weighting factor of confederation Z = 0.88). Match Result for team... M Points for win or draw I Status of match T Strength of opposing team T = (200- (RankingOpponent))/ 100 C Regional strength C = (CTeam A + CTeam B)/2 M*I*T*C*100 Ranking points 1 Friendly A v. B A 3 1.0 0.50 1.00 150 Result: 2-1 B 0 1.0 1.90 1.00 0 2 Friendly A v. B A 0 1.0 0.50 1.00 0 Result: 1-2 B 3 1.0 1.90 1.00 570 3 Friendly A v. B A 1 1.0 0.50 1.00 50 Result: 1-1 B 1 1.0 1.90 1.00 190 4 World Cup final round A v. B A 3 4.0 0.50 1.00 600 Result 2-1 B 0 4.0 1.90 1.00 0 5 Friendly A v. C A 3 1.0 1.75 0.96 504 Result: 2-1 C 0 1.0 1.90 0.96 0 6 Friendly A v. C A 0 1.0 1.75 0.96 0 Result: 1-2 C 3 1.0 1.90 0.96 547 7 Friendly A v. C A 1 1.0 1.75 0.96 168 Result: 1-1 C 1 1.0 1.90 0.96 182 8 World Cup final round A v. C A 3 4.0 1.75 0.96 2016 Result 2-1 B 0 4.0 1.90 0.96 0 9 Friendly A v. D A 3 1.0 1.20 0.94 338 Result 2-1 D 0 1.0 1.90 0.94 0 10 World Cup final round C v. D C 3 4.0 1.20 0.90 1296 Result 2-1 D 0 4.0 1.75 0.90 0 11 World Cup final round C v. D C 1 4.0 1.20 0.90 433 Result 1-1 D 1 4.0 1.75 0.90 630 IP-590_04E_WRlong.doc_07/05 5/4