MSC Guidelines for the Review of Oil Spill Response Vessels (OSRV), Lightship and Stability

Similar documents
MSC Guidelines for the Review of OSV Stability

MSC Guidelines for Review of Gas Carrier Stability (Intact, Damaged, Lightship, and Special Loading Authorization)

T. O. PHILLIPS, CDR, Tank Vessel and Offshore Division

MSC Guidelines for Review of Cargo and Miscellaneous Vessel Stability (Subchapter I)

MSC Guidelines for Review of Stability for Towing Vessels (M)

MSC Guidelines for Review of Inland Tank Barge Stability Procedure Number: C1-13 Revision Date: May 13, 2016

MSC Guidelines for Review of Passenger Vessel Stability (Subchapters K & H)

MSC Guidelines for Review of Stability for Sailing Catamaran Small Passenger Vessels (T)

U.S. COAST GUARD MARINE SAFETY CENTER PLAN REVIEW GUIDELINE

MSC Guidelines for Review of Gas Carrier/Barge Structures

MSC Guidelines for Commercial Fishing Vessel Stability Procedure Number: H2-20 Revision Date: 06/17/2013

Marine Safety Center Technical Note

MSC Guidelines for the Submission of Stability Test (Deadweight Survey or Inclining Experiment) Results

MSC Guidelines for Gas Carrier Barge Cargo Authority Procedure Number: C1-41 Revision Date: January 27, 2012

MSC Guidelines for Tank Barge General Arrangements Procedure Number: C1-16 Revision Date: June 1, 2017

MSC Guidelines for the Review of Vapor Control Systems Procedure Number: C1-46 Revision Date: March 30, 2012

MSC Guidelines for the Review of Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit (MODU) General Arrangement Plans Procedure Number: C2-36 Revision Date: 10/18/2016

MSC Guidelines for Review of Vapor Control Systems Procedure Number: C1-46 Revision Date: 01/08/2018

MSC Guidelines for Compressed Air Systems

Rules for Classification and Construction Additional Rules and Guidelines

MSC Guidelines for Liquefied Gas Barge General Arrangements

G.L.M. : the on-board stability calculator... DEMONSTRATION OPERATOR S MANUAL

MSC Guidelines for Pressure Vessels

January 30, 2018 (DRAFT) 46 CFR PART 28 SUBPART E STABILITY Page 1 of 3 Recommendations

Guidelines for the Presentation of Stability Information for Operating Personnel

MSC Guidelines for Vents, Fills and Sounds

MSC Guidelines Potable Water Systems

Marine Safety Center Technical Note

MSC Guidelines for Bilge and Ballast Systems

MSC Guidelines for Review of Rigging Systems for Sailing Vessels

RESOLUTION MSC.235(82) (adopted on 1 December 2006) ADOPTION OF THE GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSELS, 2006

MSC Guidelines for Sanitary & Sewage Systems

Trim and Stability Report for M.V. Storm Warning

MSC Guidelines for Review of General Arrangements (Subchapters H, I, K, R, & U)

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 94/P SUBDIVISION AND DAMAGE STABILITY OF NEW OIL TANKERS, CHEMICAL TANKERS AND GAS CARRIERS January

CLASS 1E 8 SMOOTH WATERS OPERATIONS 8

Subj: REQUIREMENTS FOR OUT OF WATER SURVIVAL CRAFT AND REPLACEMENT OF LIFE FLOATS AND RIGID BUOYANT APPARATUS

MSC Guidelines for Review of Emergency Evacuation Plans (NVIC 8-93)

STABILITY AND WATERTIGHT INTEGRITY

MSC Guidelines for Carbon Dioxide Fire Suppression Systems

MSC Guidelines for Review of General Arrangement Plans for Small Passenger Vessels (T)

ANNEX 4 ALTERNATIVE TEXT FOR OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR VERIFICATION OF DAMAGE STABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR TANKERS

RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF SEA-GOING SHIPS

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 15 Stability. Edition October 2015 DNV GL AS

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION. Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 15 Stability. Edition July 2016 Amended January 2017 DNV GL AS

OFFSHORE RACING CONGRESS World Leader in Rating Technology

MSC Guidelines for Engine Cooling Systems

Stability for Working Captains

MSC Guidelines for Independent Fuel Tanks

STABILITY & TRIM (MT4241)

SOFTWARE. Sesam user course. 12 May 2016 HydroD Hydrostatics & Stability. Ungraded SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER DNV GL 2016

ocr o12011

SECOND ENGINEER REG III/2 NAVAL ARCHITECTURE

RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF SMALL SEA-GOING SHIPS

MSC Guidelines for Review of Emergency Evacuation Plans (Subchapter K)

RESOLUTION MSC.141(76) (adopted on 5 December 2002) REVISED MODEL TEST METHOD UNDER RESOLUTION 14 OF THE 1995 SOLAS CONFERENCE

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

MSC/Circular.649 International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended (Adopted on 8 June 1994)

The capacity of the cargo tank venting system (46 CFR );

Marine Safety Center Technical Note

OFFSHORE SUPPORT VESSELS 2015

Ship Stability. Ch. 8 Curves of Stability and Stability Criteria. Spring Myung-Il Roh

STABILITY DOCUMENTATION FOR APPROVAL

Subj: Explanation of Upper Level Capacity and Stability Characteristics for Rolling Boat, Inc. Vessels.

Rule Change Notice For: RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF MOBILE OFFSHORE UNITS

GUIDELINES ON OPERATIONAL INFORMATION FOR MASTERS IN CASE OF FLOODING FOR PASSENGER SHIPS CONSTRUCTED BEFORE 1 JANUARY 2014 *

OFFSHORE RACING CONGRESS World Leader in Rating Technology

National Maritime Center

IMO DEVELOPMENT OF EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR HARMONIZED SOLAS CHAPTER II-1

Higher National Unit Specification. General information for centres. Unit title: Ship Stability 2. Unit code: D78J 35

IN-SERVICE HULL STABILITY VERIFICATION

Commandant IN-SERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM (ISIP) FOR FLOATING FACILITIES IN THE OUTER CONTENENTAL SHELF (OCS)

DAMAGE STABILITY TESTS OF MODELS REPRESENTING RO-RC) FERRIES PERFORMED AT DMI

Investigation of the Intact Stability Accident of the Multipurpose Vessel MS ROSEBURG

STABILITY AND WATERTIGHT INTEGRITY, CLOSING APPLIANCES

Ship Stability: Theory and Practical Application (SCQF level 8)

Innovative and Robust Design. With Full Extension of Offshore Engineering and Design Experiences.

OFFSHORE RACING CONGRESS World Leader in Rating Technology

RULES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS IDENTIFIED BY THEIR MISSIONS CHAPTERS SCOPE

RESOLUTION MEPC.64(36) adopted on 4 November 1994 GUIDELINES FOR APPROVAL OF ALTERNATIVE STRUCTURAL OR OPERATIONAL ARRANGEMENTS AS CALLED FOR IN

Guideline for Scope of Damage Stability Verification on new oil tankers, chemical tankers and gas carriers *)

Canada Shipping Act, Replaces Canada Shipping Act (CSA) Principal legislation governing: Canada Shipping Act, 2001

RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 86/P EXPLANATORY NOTES TO SOLAS CONVENTION AND DIRECTIVE 2003/25/EC STABILITY AND SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS

RAPID RESPONSE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT MOBILE OFFSHORE DRILLING UNITS

ANNEX 3 DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR VERIFICATION OF DAMAGE STABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR TANKERS GUIDELINES FOR VERIFICATION OF STABILITY ON TANKERS PART 1

ANNEX 5 IMO MARINE CASULATY AND INCIDENT REPORT DAMAGE CARDS* AND INTACT STABILITY CASUALTY RECORDS

PREDICTING THE ABILITY OF SURVIVAL AFTER DAMAGE IN TANKERS. José Poblet Martínez - SENER, (Spain) José Javier Díaz Yraola - SENER, (Spain)

OPERATIONS SEAFARER CERTIFICATION GUIDANCE NOTE SA MARITIME QUALIFICATIONS CODE

Part 3 Pressure hull and structures Chapter 7 Stability and buoyancy

DQM Annual Hopper QA Checks

Guideline for Scope of Damage Stability Verification on new oil tankers, chemical tankers and gas carriers

Chapter 2 Hydrostatics and Control

Hockema & Whalen Associates

RESOLUTION MSC.429(98) (adopted on 9 June 2017) REVISED EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE SOLAS CHAPTER II-1 SUBDIVISION AND DAMAGE STABILITY REGULATIONS

GUIDELINES FOR VERIFICATION OF DAMAGE STABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR TANKERS

This lesson will be confined to the special case of ships at rest in still water. Questions of motions resulting from waves are not considered at

Visit Us:

SHIP STABILITY IN PRACTICE

RESOLUTION MSC.415(97) (adopted on 25 November 2016) AMENDMENTS TO PART B OF THE INTERNATIONAL CODE ON INTACT STABILITY, 2008 (2008 IS CODE)

Transcription:

R. J. LECHNER, CDR, Chief, Tank Vessel and Offshore Division Purpose This Plan Review Guidance (PRG) explains the requirements for seeking plan approval for stability plans and calculations from the Marine Safety Center (MSC) for Oil Spill Response Vessels between 15 and 500 U.S. gross tons that carry recovered oil in bulk in accordance with the below references. (OSRVs of 500 gross tons or more are regulated as tank vessels under the provision of 46 CFR Subchapter D). References a. MVI Policy Letter No. 1-95, dated February 13, 1995 b. NVIC 3-89, Guidelines for the Presentation of Stability Information for Operating Personnel c. MSC Marine Technical Note 04-95, Light Ship Change Determination d. 46 CFR 170, Subpart F, Determination of Lightweight Displacement and Centers of Gravity e. NVIC 17-91, Guidelines for Conducting Stability Tests f. ASTM F 1321-92 (Reapproved 2004), Standard Guide for Conducting a Stability Test (Lightweight Survey and Inclining Experiment) to Determine the Light Ship Displacement and Centers of Gravity of a Vessel g. 46 CFR 173. Subpart B, Lifting h. 46 CFR 173 Subpart E, Towing i. Marine Safety Manual, Vol. II, Oil Recovery Vessels Disclaimer These guidelines were developed by the Marine Safety Center staff as an aid in the preparation and review of vessel plans and submissions. They were developed to supplement existing guidance. They are not intended to substitute or replace laws, regulations, or other official Coast Guard policy documents. The responsibility to demonstrate compliance with all applicable laws and regulations still rests with the plan submitter. The Coast Guard and the U. S. Department of Homeland Security expressly disclaim liability resulting from the use of this document. 1

Contact Information If you have any questions or comments concerning this document, please contact the Marine Safety Center by e-mail or phone. Please refer to the Procedure Number: C1-20 E-mail: msc@uscg.mil Phone: 202-475-3401 General Review Guidance: Reference (a) is technically superseded by reference (i), however, portions of reference (a) did not cross over completely. Therefore, portions of reference (a) will still be utilized. A new NVIC on OSRVs is expected to supersede both. Per Figure 10-4 of reference (a), all OSRV s must meet the stability requirements of 46 CFR Subchapter S. Since Subchapter S applies to OSRVs less than 100 gross tons, the intact stability requirements of 46 CFR Subchapter T, Part 178 are generally not applicable, and the simplified stability proof test in that part is not normally allowed as an option to demonstrate adequate stability. OSRV stability reviews generally fall into one of three categories, depending on the method the submitter uses to establish the acceptable range of loading conditions. The greater this range, the greater the operational flexibility, and the greater complexity required in the stability review/guidance. The three most common methods are listed as follows, in order of increasing complexity: stability letter with a limited number of specific authorized loading conditions stability letter (simplified) with approved loading diagram(s) approved T&S Book, with or without an accompanying stability letter Regardless of the type of stability review encountered, the basic requirement is that the submitter must clearly demonstrate that each possible loading condition meets the required stability criteria of 46 CFR, Subchapter S per reference (a). In order to establish a range of acceptable loading conditions, a common technique involves generation of a maximum KG or minimum GM curve. These curves typically plot the maximum KG or minimum GM value on the ordinate axis, against the range of operational drafts on the abscissa. Acceptable curves incorporate values derived from the most stringent governing stability criteria, along with trim considerations. A satisfactory stability review results in operational guidance in the form of a 2

stability letter, and approved vessel loading conditions as indicated above. If the T&S book includes sufficient operational restrictions, instructions, and guidance that would normally be included in a stability letter (see reference (b)), then the MSC may return correspondence approving the T&S book in lieu of a stability letter, noting that the operational instructions in the T&S book must be strictly followed. In addition, stability reviews may be preliminary or final, depending on the basis of the light ship values. Preliminary stability calculations are not required, but at the option of the owner/naval architect they may be submitted before conducting the inclining experiment of the vessel, using assumed light ship values. This is often done to facilitate expedited final stability reviews. Preliminary stability reviews are conducted in the same manner as final stability reviews, except that a stability letter is not generated and all returned items are marked Examined. Following the inclining experiment of the vessel and calculated results indicating the true light ship of the vessel, a final stability review may be accomplished and a stability letter generated. A new set of stability calculations is not required if the submitter demonstrates that the assumed light ship values closely match those resulting from the incline experiment (see reference (c) for further guidance and acceptable ranges). If the vessel is new and not a sister vessel, has the Application for Inspection been submitted? In general, no plan review may occur until receipt of a copy of the Application. Is it clearly stated what is desired from the MSC? Are all plans requiring Coast Guard review and/or approval submitted in triplicate? Are there any special or unusual requests involved? Ensure the following information have been received ( * as applicable): General Arrangements Lightship values based on calculated results of stability test data Lines, offsets, or computer disk with hull model Hydrostatic Tables Tank Capacity Tables\Plan Ullage & Sounding Tables Intact stability calculations Damage stability calculations* Lifting calculations* Towing Calculations* Trim and Stability (T&S) Booklet, Loading Diagrams, or summary loading conditions* Verify Lightweight Characteristics utilizing one of the following methods: 1) Does a sister vessel with known characteristics exist? 3

2) Has an approved procedure and subsequent stability test been performed in accordance with references (d), (e), and (f) and reviewed in accordance with the MSC guidelines for review of Stability Test Results? For vessels carrying recovered oil in bulk, verify the applicability of tank vessel intact and damage stability requirements by using the attached Tank Vessel Stability Matrix. Note that OSRVs are exempt from 46 CFR 172 Subpart D per 46 CFR 172.060, 33 CFR 157.01(b), and 46 USC 3702. If the vessel does not carry recovered oil in bulk, refer to other MSC guidelines for review of stability applicable to the appropriate inspection Subchapter of the vessel. Verify the applicability of the weather criterion of 46 CFR 170.173, Criterion for Vessels of Unusual Proportion and Form. The applicability of this criterion is determined by the Marine Safety Center. The MSC generally requires all self-propelled vessels, other than tugboats, towboats, and vessels with barge shaped hulls, to meet this criteria. Ensure that the compliance has been demonstrated for all applicable intact and damage stability requirements ( refer to MSC guidelines for Tank Vessel Stability for further guidance). If the vessel is equipped with a crane, ensure compliance with 46 CFR 173, Subpart B (see MSC guidelines for review of Crane Lifting calculations PRG C1-3). Ensure that the stability instructions and operating guidance are technically correct and detailed, sufficient, clear, and easy to use, in accordance with reference (b). The following items will be included in the return correspondence from the MSC, and copies will be provided to the cognizant OCMI and ABS (loadline/stability group): Approved light ship weight and location (VCG and LCG) Comment to ABS noting the maximum allowed draft (specify molded or extreme) Comment to ABS to include a statement in the Load Line certificate requiring compliance with the stability letter and approved stability guidance (T&S book, loading diagrams, etc.) If a stability letter is generated, it will contain the appropriate standard phrases and stability instructions (bilges, hull openings, watertight doors, weight changes, slack tank restrictions, etc.). See reference (b) for additional information. 4

Ensure that the location of downflooding is taken into account for compliance with the stability criteria. If the towing authorization is requested on the stability letter, ensure compliance with the towline pull criteria of 46 CFR 173, Subpart E (reference (h)). If damaged stability criteria apply, ensure that the correct assumptions of space permeability, in accordance with Table 174.207(b). If the unusual proportion and form intact stability criteria is used, ensure that the calculations incorporate the zero trimming moment method, per 46 CFR, 170.173(d) Ensure that the lesser of the stability limiting draft and Geometry Load Line draft is used for loadline draft and freeboard per 46 CFR, Subpart E The following items are indicative of normal MSC plan review: Perform independent calculations to verify values used for free-surface corrections. At respective drafts, compare the displacement and KM values listed in the hydrostatic tables to the values used in corresponding loading conditions. Construct an outer hull model in HECSALV or GHS and generate hydrostatics to compare with those submitted. Independently calculate tank capacities. Compare 100% capacities, and weight loading values and locations to those used in the submitted calculations. Independently generate the required KM or GM curve, using all applicable stability criteria. Construct a full HECSALV or GHS model including compartmentation. Analyze different loading conditions of the vessel and compare stability results from the computer model to the submitted stability 5

Definitions Downflooding Point: The lowest opening on a vessel that allows the entry of seawater into the hull or superstructure of an undamaged vessel due to heel, trim, or submergence of the vessel. Attachments Tank Vessel Stability Matrix 6