White-tailed Deer Management in Urban/Suburban Environments: Planning for Success

Similar documents
Deer Management in Maryland -Overview. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Deer Management in Maryland. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Maryland DNR

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

New Changes to the Managed Lands Deer Program (MLDP)

Deer Management Unit 127

Deer Management Unit 152

Deer Committee Summary and Recommendations. The Village of North Haven deer committee was formed in early 2013 to

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

Hunter Perceptions of Chronic Wasting Disease in Illinois

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Deer Management Unit 252

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

April Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

CITY OF BLUE EARTH AGENDA CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MONDAY, 4:30 P.M. Old Business. 1. Chief Fletcher-Deer Hunt Management Process

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

DMU 038 Jackson County

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR MANAGEMENT IN NEIGHBORING STATES

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Salida Urban Deer Task Force Recommendations

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit

DMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit

Biologist s Answer: What are your goals? Deer Management. Define goals, objectives. Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes?

PREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE

Full Spectrum Deer Management Services

CITY OF BLUE EARTH AGENDA CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MONDAY AUGUST 6, 4:30 P.M. Old Business. 1. Wild Animal Mitigation Brainstorming Session

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

MANAGED LANDS DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION. General Requirements

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL AND EFFECTS OF LETHAL CONTROL

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

Managing Wildlife Populations

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. Predator/Prey Component. Terms of Reference

PRESENTATION TO TOWN BOARD

A Guide to Deer Management in Developed Areas of Pennsylvania

Comment Letter 1 for Item 5

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

A Risk-based Audit of the Captive/Privatelyowned Cervid Industry in Michigan

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE FIELD STAFF RESPONSE FOR COUGAR INFORMATION AND CONFLICT SITUATIONS

City of Delafield Deer Management Program 2018

Jeffrey M. Ver Steeg Colorado Parks and Wildlife. December 14, 2016

MANAGED LANDS DEER PERMITS WHITE-TAILED DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION General Information

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

Population Parameters and Their Estimation. Uses of Survey Results. Population Terms. Why Estimate Population Parameters? Population Estimation Terms

Stakeholder Activity

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS

TIEE Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology - Volume 2, August 2004

WILDLIFE HERITAGE TRUST ACCOUNT PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM

Deer Management Unit 122

Iroquoia Heights Conservation Area White-tailed Deer Management Strategy

DMU 419 Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia, and Shiawassee Counties

Colorado West Slope Mule Deer Strategy Public Engagement Report

Deer Management Unit 249

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

ALBERTA FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING PASSED RESOLUTIONS FEBRUARY 21, 2015

Tennessee Black Bear Public Opinion Survey

Lake Lansing Park-North. Deer Management Plan

Illinois Science and Social Science Standards 11.A.2e; 11.B.2a; 12.B.2a; 13.B,2f; 17.A.2b: 17.B.2b; 17.C.2c; 18.B.2b

Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 255

COYOTE MANAGEMENT PLAN. Purpose

By Kip Adams, Deer Project Leader, New Hampshire Fish and Game Department and Darrell Covell, UNH Wildlife Extension Specialist

Managing Encounters Between Humans and Coyotes. Guidelines and Information

CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED ORDINANCE NO

Wisconsin Wildlife Federation Legislative Summary State Legislative Session August (26 th ) 2017

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. February 2, 2016

Mitigating Vehicle Collisions with Large Wildlife

CHEETAH PROJECT Cheetah Conservation Fund. Interviewers name Date

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. Sand Plain Big Woods Goal Block

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Regarding the Draft Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) Conservation Strategy

Deer Season Report

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

The City has been approached by several individuals about the destruction of their fruits and vegetables.

Transcription:

White-tailed Deer Management in Urban/Suburban Environments: Planning for Success KEVIN SCHWAUSCH Technical Guidance Biologist Texas Parks and Wildlife

WTD were once considered to be threatened in Texas due to unregulated market hunting and extensive habitat modifications Have rapidly increased especially in the last several decades WTD are very adaptable species Introduction

Recent Causes for Population Increase Expanding human populations increasing urban area Lack of predators Increased protection

Nuisance Deer Issues Vehicle damage Property (landscape) damage Declining herd health Disease transmission Human injury/mortality

Can it be Fixed? Yes, but No quick fix No cheap fix Public acceptance of management practices take time The problem will not go away The longer you wait, the more expensive it will be

Obstacles to Population Control Aesthetics (animal watching) Safety & liability concerns Conflicting social attitudes & perceptions Hunting/firearm restrictions Public relations concerns

Steps for Success 1. Define the problem 2. Identify the goals 3. Build Consensus towards a solution 4. Implementation

Defining the Problem Eating landscaping Vehicle collisions Human/Deer interaction Disease

Identifying Goals Reduce Population Reduce Vehicle Collisions Reduce Property Damage Maintain Healthy Deer

Building Consensus Residents Local Government Officials POA s Media Local Organizations Form a Wildlife Committee Consensus is what makes or breaks a management strategy

What can be Controlled? Births (decrease) Deaths (increase) Ingress (decrease) Egress (increase)

Controlling Birth Rate Contraception Best Case - Stabilize the Population Population declines only in the long term Can be effective for population stabilization Closed population Small population Potential for use to keep populations down

Controlling Ingress Questions to be asked: How large an area are you dealing with? Population density on adjacent property? What are your goals? How much is deer removal costing you? Methods Fencing Feeding Bans (limited success)

Increasing Egress Trapping and Relocation Problems with Relocation Availability of Release Sites Effectiveness Cost Mortality

Increasing Mortality Hunting Archery Firearms Lethal Control Trap, Transport, & Process Permit (TTP) Meat cannot be wasted

Permits for Managing Deer Populations There are 6 different types of permits: 1. Managed Lands Deer Permit (MLDP) 2. Antler-less/Spike Deer Control Permit (ADCP) 3. Depredation Permit 4. Trap, Transport, and Transplant Permit (TTT) 5. Urban TTT 6. Trap, Transport and Process Permit (TTP)

Permits for Managing Deer Populations There are 6 different types of permits: 1. Managed Lands Deer Permit (MLDP) 2. Antler-less/Spike Deer Control Permit (ADCP) 3. Depredation Permit 4. Trap, Transport, and Transplant Permit (TTT) 5. Urban TTT 6. Trap, Transport and Process Permit (TTP)

When are you Done? Never Regardless of your goals, deer population will need maintenance efforts The lower you go, the less the maintenance Without a fence, maintenance will be much higher

How Many Deer do you Leave? Sociological implications People want to see deer People don t want deer damage Cost implications Initial costs are higher Maintenance costs Habitat implications Carrying capacity

Sociological Realities Constituents Must gain consensus Educate, educate, educate Media Make sure the FACTS are known Designate media contacts Expect resistance

Implementation Develop baseline measurements Keep good records Success of any management practice can not be determined in a single application

The FACTS of Control The deer population is out of control Contraception alone won t reduce the population Hunting alone probably won t achieve goals Trapping is a long-term expensive prospect Lethal control will always be part of the solution The meat will not be wasted The remaining deer will be healthy The habitat/landscape will rebound

Summary Doing nothing will only make the situation worse There are no silver bullets Deer must be managed Consequence of living in deer habitat Long-term planning is required Maintenance must be planned and budgeted forever