Handbook for the identification of yellowfin and bigeye tunas in fresh, but less than ideal condition

Similar documents
Field Identification of Tunas from Indian Waters

Photographic identification guide for non-target fish species taken in WCPO purse seine fisheries

FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS CAESIONIDAE. Fusiliers

2/11/2013. Introduction. Objectives. Selecting individuals to measure. Biological Data Length Frequency Sampling

PIRFO. Purse-seine fish ID cards. for Pacific Islands Regional Fisheries Observers

Pierre Meke, Biological Data Length Frequency Sampling

FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS SYNODONTIDAE. Lizardfishes

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FIFTH REGULAR SESSION August 2009 Port Vila, Vanuatu

FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS. FAMILY: SIGANIDAE FISHING AREA 51 (W. Indian Ocean) Siganis rivulatus Forsskål, 1775

30 a. Allothunnus fallai Fig b.

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SIXTH REGULAR SESSION August 2010 Nuku alofa, Tonga

2. SYSTEMATIC CATALOGUE

- 7 - DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES

$500 to $1,000 Reward OFFERED FOR ARCHIVAL TAGS FROM ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA

Blue swimming crab species identification and data collection activity

Apogon abrogramma Fraser and Lachner, 1985

Tips for Identifying Common Fish Species in the Bush River

Species Identification of small juvenile tunas caught in surface fisheries in the Phili... 1/13 ページ

$500 to $1,000 Reward OFFERED FOR ARCHIVAL TAGS FROM ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA

$500 to $1,000 Reward OFFERED FOR ARCHIVAL TAGS FROM ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA

Marine Fishes. Chapter 8

My Key to Manitoba Fish

Haemulon chrysargyreum Günther, 1859

WCPFC SC1 ST WP 4. Tim Lawson and Peter Williams. Oceanic Fisheries Programme Secretariat of the Pacific Community Noumea, New Caledonia

FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS. FAMILY: LETHRINIDAE FISHING AREA 51 (W. Indian Ocean) Lethrinus conchyliatus (Smith, 1959)

Common Carp. Common Carp

BONY FISHES TECHNICAL TERMS

Thresher Shark Alopias vulpinus

ANGLER S GUIDE TO FLORIDA SHARKS OF THE GULF OF MEXICO

* A New Species of Cichlid Fish From Lake Malawi. Pseudotropheus tursiops, \(I75 Tropical Fish Hobbyist a'l (3) : 8 L-? 0. ,$ IOU.

-8- spinous. nape caudal fin. body depth. pectoral fin. anus. total length Fig. 4

oxfitates AMiiiui?can JMllselIm Threadfin from New Guinea BY J. T. NICHOLS A New Blenny from Bali and a New

YELLOWFIN TUNA (Thunnus albacares)

Perch Dissection Lab

Name That Fish : Identify living things using an existing classification key, and explain the rationale used.

Remarks: Allen & Swainston (1988) have erroneously recorded this species from northwestern Australia.

Landmarking protocol

click for previous page D E

Neatness 0 1 Accuracy Completeness Lab Class Procedure Total Lab Score

Biological Sampling Newslet for Observers and Port Samplers

Fish Species. Dorado or Golden Dorado- Classification:

LIBRARY. Class\ V"^ A *Ii:T_

NOTES ON EGGS, LARV^ AND JUVENILES OF FISHES FROM INDIAN WATERS

Using and Constructing a Classification Key Adapted from Prentice Hall Lab 29. Pre-Lab Discussion

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Second Regular Session 7-18 August 2006 Manila, Philippines

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

Size selectivity of tuna purse seine nets estimated from FAD sets data

Using a Dichotomous Classification Key to Identify Common Freshwater Fish of New York State

Papua New Guinea/SPC Tuna Tagging Project: PRFP linking to the bigger picture

FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FISTULARIIDAE. Cornetfishes, flutemouths

Tropical Pacific Wrasses, Part 1 REEF Fishinar March 14, 2018, Amy Lee - Instructor Questions? Feel free to contact

FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS KUHLIIDAE * Flagtails, daras

/20 Lab #5 The Dissection of the Perch

soft dorsal-fin and caudal-fin margin pale small embedded scales on maxilla

Overview of tuna fisheries in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, including economic conditions 2015 (WCPFC-SC /GN WP-1)

Predicting skipjack tuna dynamics and effects of climate change using SEAPODYM with fishing and tagging data

FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS ALBULIDAE. Bonefishes

ISSF Research Cruise WCPO 1

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE EIGHTH REGULAR SESSION August 2012 Busan, Republic of Korea

FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS CONGIOPODIDAE* Horsefishes

Similarities and Differences

FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS BELONIDAE. Needlefishes

Pelagic Longline. Fishing Procedures & Gear.

PHILIPPINE FISHERIES OBSERVER PROGRAMME

Biological Sampling Newslet

JIMAR PFRP ANNUAL REPORT FOR FY To protect, restore, and manage the use of coastal and ocean resources through ecosystem-base management

FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS ACROPOMATIDAE. (= "Percichthyidae") Glow-bellies and splitfins

Lab 12: Dichotomous Key Page 1 of 10 STUDENT LABORATORY PACKET

Managing Pacific Tuna stocks under strong fishing pressure and Climate Change impact

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

Longnose Skate Raja rhina

Perch Dissection Lab

TROPICAL TUNA FISHERIES IN THE INDIAN OCEAN OF INDONESIA

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRD REGULAR SESSION August 2007 Honolulu, United States of America

Paulding Soil & Water Conservation District Fish Sale Guide

92 ND MEETING DOCUMENT IATTC-92 INF-C

NATIONWIDE: GOLDFISH STANDARDS

On-board handling of sashimi-grade tuna A Practical Guide for Crew Members

COORDINATING WORKING PARTY ON FISHERY STATISTICS. Nineteenth Session. Noumea, New Caledonia, July 2001 AGENCY REPORT.

Takayuki Matsumoto 1, Keisuke Satoh 1, Yasuko Semba 1, Tatsuki Oshima 2 and Mikio Toyonaga 2

Proposals for improved figures in the tropical tunas executive summaries

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SEVENTH REGULAR SESSION August 2011 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

SHARKS. How sharks work

Impact of Industrial Tuna Fisheries on Fish Stocks and the Ecosystem of the Pacific Ocean

Anatomy, Physiology, and Ecology of Fishes I Biology of Fishes

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge Ordinary Level

FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS MUGILOIDIDAE. (Parapercidae of some authors) Sandsmelts, sandperches, grubfishes

Cylicostephanus asymetricus

O'opu Prints and Dissections

"Present status of Tropical tuna fisheries in Iran"

FROM THE OFFICE. Well fellow fisho s, another Month down & winter is almost over, with Greenwell Point just over a Month away.

Blue sharks are targeted in the pelagic shark longline fishery, and caught as bycatch in the tuna/swordfish longline fishery.

Origin and Importance! ! Fish were the first vertebrates to appear on Earth about 500 million years ago.

Draft Addendum V For Board Review. Coastal Sharks Management Board August 8, 2018

Haemulon sciurus (Shaw, 1803)

By Charles Hawks Sponsored By The Angelfish Society

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-05 BET A

FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS NEMIPTERIDAE. (including Scolopsidae of authors) Threadfin breams, monocle breams and dwarf monocle breams

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

SOUTH PACIFIC COMMISSION. TWENTY-SECOND REGIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING ON FISHERIES (Noumea, New Caledonia, 6-10 August 1990)

Transcription:

0 WCPFC SC1 FT IP 1 1st Meeting of the Scientific Committee of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission WCPFC SC1 Noumea, New Caledonia 8 19 August 2005 Handbook for the identification of yellowfin and bigeye tunas in fresh, but less than ideal condition David Itano & Siosifa Fukofuka Pelagic Fisheries Research Programme, Honolulu, Hawaii. Oceanic Fisheries Programme, Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Noumea, New Caledonia. August 2005

A Handbook for the Identification of Yellowfin and Bigeye Tunas in Fresh, but less than ideal condition Siosifa Fukofuka Oceanic Fisheries Programme Noumea New Caledonia David G Itano Pelagic Fisheries Research Program University of Hawaii, JIMAR Honolulu, Hawaii USA 1

Handbook for the Identification of Yellowfin and Bigeye Tunas in Fresh, but less than ideal condition Siosifa Fukofuka Oceanic Fisheries Programme Noumea New Caledonia David G Itano Pelagic Fisheries Research Program University of Hawaii, JIMAR Honolulu, Hawaii USA for the 1 st Meeting of the Scientific Committee of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission Noumea, New Caledonia, 8-19 August 2005 Fishing Technology Specialist Working Group FT IP-1 August 2005 Note: All images are by the authors unless specifically credited otherwise. No images represented here may be reproduced separately from this handbook without express written consent of the authors. The MS Powerpoint version of this ID guide can be made available to fisheries observer programs and agencies for training purposes by contacting the authors directly. Note: all fish lengths are measured fork length to the nearest centimeter. 2

Identification of Yellowfin and Bigeye Tuna by Visual Criteria Identifying fresh tuna is a relatively easy matter compared to distinguishing frozen or iced fish. Even at small sizes, each species has distinct coloration, fin lengths and shape, body markings and morphologies that provide rapid visual keys to positive identification. Frozen tuna are far more difficult to distinguish due to fin damage, discoloration, skin abrasion and distortion or crushing during the storage process. Nevertheless, these fish are still easily distinguishable to the trained eye as bigeye (left) and a yellowfin tuna (right). 3

Identification of Yellowfin and Bigeye Tuna by Visual Criteria Even though tuna are easiest to distinguish in fresh condition, misidentifications and grouping of both species commonly occurs in surface fisheries. The pictures in this handbook should serve as a best case scenario for identifying yellowfin from bigeye tuna at all sizes. The Handbook also compare the ideal VS less than ideal condition for each species Juvenile yellowfin and bigeye tuna in fresh condition can be reliably identified using a combination of the following features: Internal characteristics liver appearance and morphology swim bladder morphology External characteristics body markings body morphology head and eye morphology pectoral fin characteristics caudal fin characteristics 4 finlet coloration

Internal Characteristics Liver morphology and appearance Large, conspicuous organ along anterior, ventral portion of gut cavity Yellowfin Right lobe longer and thinner than rounded medial and left lobes smooth, clear. No striations Bigeye Three rounded lobes of about equal size Ventral surface striated 5

Internal Characteristics Liver morphology and appearance Large, conspicuous organ along anterior, ventral portion of gut cavity (yellowfin and bigeye tuna 43 cm) Bigeye Three rounded lobes of about equal size Ventral surface striated Yellowfin Right lobe longer and thinner than rounded medial and left lobes smooth, clear. No striations 6

Internal Characteristics Swim bladder - ideal Yellowfin (46 cm) only in anterior half of body cavity inconspicuous, usually deflated or slightly inflated YFT BET Bigeye (46 cm) occupies almost entire body cavity large, conspicuous, often inflated 7

Internal Characteristics Swim bladder Yellowfin (43 cm) Inflated swim bladder YFT BET Bigeye (43 cm) Deflated swim bladder 8

Body markings - ideal External Characteristics Yellowfin Vertical lines pattern of closely spaced Dotted lines alternate with rows of dots Line pattern extends from tail, forward to beneath pectoral fin and to above mid-lateral line Bigeye Irregular vertical, widely spaced white lines or marks Some rows of dots but few and irregular Line pattern irregular, broken, confined mostly to below mid-lateral line 9

External Characteristics Body markings faded Yellowfin (~40 cm) Lines slightly curved, are evenly spaced and separated by rows of spots Line pattern extends from tail, forward to beneath pectoral fin and to above mid-lateral line 10

Body markings faded and disappearing Yellowfin 45 cm and bigeye 45 cm Lines slightly curved, are evenly spaced and separated by rows of spots extending to below pectoral fin, still obvious and easy to recognize Irregular vertical pale lines on bigeye have faded, but can still be recognized YFT BET 11

External Characteristics Body markings faded almost completely Yellowfin 56 cm and bigeye 53 cm Dotted, vertical lines and markings on yellowfin are still recognizable, mainly below the lateral line and pectoral fin Irregular vertical lines on bigeye have faded and practically gone YFT BET 12

Body markings faded and disappeared Yellowfin and Bigeye ( 70 cm) Irregular vertical lines and body markings on the bigeye have disappeared completely Body markings on yellowfin are still visible, but mainly below the lateral line BET YFT 13

External Characteristics Body markings faded and disappeared Yellowfin and Bigeye ( 70 cm) Body markings on the yellowfin have disappeared completely Irregular vertical lines on the bigeye body have also disappeared completely YFT BET 14

External Characteristics Body markings faded and disappeared Yellowfin and Bigeye ( 90 cm) Both markings on yellowfin and bigeye have completely disappeared 15

External Characteristics Body markings faded and disappeared Bigeye ( 60-100 cm) No body markings on bigeye tuna are visible Silver white colour remains typical of dead, fresh fish 100 90 80 70 60 16

Coloration - ideal Yellowfin Fresh yellowfin show a bright yellow mid-lateral band Dark black back may be separated from the gold by a thin blue band Fins yellow to yellowish, anal fin sometimes tinged with silver Flanks and belly silvery white Bigeye Golden to brassy mid-lateral band, less distinct Dark black back edged with bright metallic blue line Fins dusky yellowish with anal fin tinged with silver Caudal fin often dusky black Flanks and belly pearly white 17

Coloration: Example 1 (YFT/BET 45 cm) External Characteristics However, colors fade very quickly after death making both species appear similar in color. Therefore body colors are not a reliable key to species identification. The yellow mid lateral band on the yellowfin is gone Blueish/black colour above the pectoral fin area on both species YFT BET 18

Coloration: External Characteristics Example 2 (YFT 59 cm BET 57 cm) The yellow band on the yellowfin mid lateral has disappeared Blueish black colour above the pectoral fin visible on both species Second dorsal of yellowfin still bright yellow in colour while bigeye fin half yellow with black band near base and front BET YFT 19

Coloration: External Characteristics Example 3 (YFT 51/BET 56) The yellow band on both species has disappeared completely Blueish colour above the pectoral fin on both species faded to black BET YFT 20

Body and eye morphology Yellowfin (45 cm) body elongate, long tail section body outline flat between second dorsal and caudal fin and between anal and caudal fin smaller eye diameter compared to bigeye of same Fork Length YFT BET Bigeye (45 cm) body deep, rounded body outline rounded, forming a smooth dorsal and ventral arc between snout and caudal peduncle greater eye diameter compared to yellowfin of same Fork Length 21

Body and eye morphology Yellowfin (56 cm) shorter head length and depth vs Fork Length than bigeye smaller eye diameter compared to bigeye of same Fork Length YFT BET Bigeye (53 cm) greater head length and depth vs Fork Length than yellowfin greater eye diameter compared to yellowfin of same Fork Length body deep, rounded 22

Head and eye morphology Yellowfin (68 cm) shorter head length and depth vs Fork Length than bigeye smaller eye diameter compared to bigeye of same Fork Length Bigeye (65 cm) greater head length and depth vs Fork Length than yellowfin greater eye diameter compared to yellowfin of same Fork Length 23

Head and eye morphology Yellowfin (70 cm) shorter head length and depth vs Fork Length than bigeye smaller eye diameter compared to bigeye of same Fork Length Bigeye (70 cm) greater head length and depth vs Fork Length than yellowfin greater eye diameter compared to yellowfin of same Fork Length 24

Pectoral fin length and characteristics (for small fish less than ~ 40 cm Fork Length) Yellowfin - ideal pectoral fin short, just reaching insertion of second dorsal fin pectoral fin thicker, stiffer and rounded at tip Bigeye pectoral fin slightly longer reaching second dorsal fin pectoral fin thin, flexible and pointed at the tip However, pectoral fin lengths are not that different in very small fish. Other features are more distinct such as body markings and morphology 25

Pectoral fin length and characteristics Yellowfin (45 cm) pectoral fin short, extending to base of second dorsal fin pectoral fin thicker, stiff, blade-like Pectoral fin tend to split at the tip of the fin Bigeye (45 cm) pectoral fin long, extending beyond the second dorsal fin base pectoral tapers to thin point, flexible, feather-like For large bigeye and yellowfin above 150 cm, the pectoral fins become similar in size and shape. 26

Pectoral fin length and characteristics Yellowfin (70 cm) pectoral fin short, extending to base of second dorsal fin pectoral fin thicker, stiff, blade-like Bigeye (70 cm) pectoral fin long, extending beyond the second dorsal fin base pectoral tapers to thin point, flexible, often curves ventrally at side 27

Pectoral fin length and characteristics Yellowfin (90 cm) pectoral fin short, extending to base of second dorsal fin pectoral fin thicker, stiff, blade-like Bigeye (90 cm) pectoral fin long, extending beyond the second dorsal fin base pectoral tapers to thin point, flexible, often curves ventrally at side 28

Pectoral fin length and characteristics Bigeye (60 100 cm) pectoral tapers to thin point, flexible, often curves ventrally at side 29

Pectoral fin length and characteristics Example: smashed fish Bigeye (77 cm) pectoral fin long, extending beyond the second dorsal fin base, curved ventrally Pectoral fin can be used to identify bigeye although body is damaged 30

Pectoral fin length and characteristics Yellowfin and Bigeye (70 cm) Pectoral fin of yellowfin is broken but other fins and body markings can be used to identify the yellowfin Second dorsal and anal fins beginning to elongate, yellow color Bigeye pectoral fin goes past the second dorsal fin 31

Caudal fin External Characteristics Yellowfin Central portion of trailing edge forms a distinct notch Central area of caudal fin with two raised mounds Caudal fins shown below have lost all colour and have become split and frayed Bigeye Central portion of trailing edge forms a flat or slightly crescent shaped area Central area of caudal fin flat Yellowfin 46 cm 32

Caudal fin center of trailing edge Yellowfin (70 cm) Bigeye (70 cm) Forms V shaped notch Forms flat or slightly rounded cup BET YFT 33

Caudal fin center of trailing edge Bigeye Yellowfin Forms flat or slightly rounded cup Forms V or M shaped notch BET YFT V Notch on YFT tails are easy to recognize in large yellowfin YFT BET YFT 40 cm YFT 34

Finlet coloration - ideal Yellowfin bright yellow with no black edging Bigeye yellowish color edged with black 35

Finlet coloration Yellowfin bright yellow with no black edging Bigeye yellowish colour edged with fine black line 36

Finlet coloration Yellowfin bright yellow with no black edging Bigeye yellowish color edged with fine black line 37

Comparisons by size and features - ideal Yellowfin (~ 33 cm) Short, blunt pectoral fin Closely spaced markings of lines and rows of dots in chevron pattern extending to insertion of pectoral fin Shorter, smaller head, small, round eye Yellowish tail Bigeye (~ 34 cm) Longer, pointed pectoral fin Irregular, white lines across body with dusky markings Large head, deep body, large eye Dusky colored tail 38

Examples of small yellowfin and bigeye Yellowfin 17 cm Bigeye 32.5 cm Yellowfin 25 cm Bigeye 34 cm Yellowfin 32 cm Bigeye 36 cm Yellowfin 37 cm Yellowfin 41 cm Bigeye 44 cm 39

Examples of extremely small yellowfin tuna These yellowfin tuna are of a size that you are unlikely to see in capture fisheries but are commonly found inside the stomachs of other tuna and predatory fish. They were collected on an anchored FAD in Hawaiian waters on 15 August 1997 and measured 12.6, 14.3, 14.5 and 15.9 cm FL. Despite their tiny size, the pattern of lines separated by a row of spots is apparent even in fish of this size. 40

Comparisons by size and features Yellowfin (~ 45 cm) Long, narrow body, small head, small eye Closely spaced, chevron pattern of alternating lines and rows of spots, faded but visible Bigeye (~ 45 cm) Large, deep head, large eye, deeply rounded body Long pectoral fin with thin, pointed tip Vertical, widely spaced irregular white lines still visible 41

Comparisons by size and features Bigeye (~ 51cm) Large, deep head, large eye, deeply rounded body Long pectoral fin past the second dorsal attachment with thin, pointed tip Body markings no longer visible Yellowfin (~ 56 cm) Long, narrow body, small head, small eye Closely spaced, chevron pattern of alternating lines and rows of spots almost gone 42

Comparisons by size and features Bigeye (~ 65 cm) Large, deep head, large eye, deeply rounded body Long pectoral fin with thin, pointed tip Vertical, widely spaced irregular white lines disappeared Damage to the skin around the lower pectoral fin attachment Yellowfin (~ 68 cm) Long, narrow body, small head, small eye Closely spaced, chevron pattern of alternating lines and rows of spots can barely be recognized Skin below the dorsal finlets and around the pectoral fin base has been scraped and discolored 43

Comparisons by size and features Yellowfin (~ 70 cm) Long, narrow body, small head, small eye Closely spaced, chevron pattern of alternating lines and rows of spots disappeared Yellow and blue bands above the pectoral fin are still visible Bigeye (~ 70 cm) Large, deep head, large eye, body deeply rounded body Long pectoral fin with thin, pointed tip Body markings have disappeared A healed cookie cutter shark bite visible above anal fin, typical of bigeye tuna but also seen in some yellowfin 44

Comparisons by size and features Bigeye (~ 77cm) Large, deep head, large eye, deeply rounded body Long pectoral fin with thin, pointed tip Body markings have disappeared Yellowfin (~ 77 cm) Long, narrow body, small head, small eye Closely spaced, chevron pattern of alternating lines and rows of spots mainly below the lateral, faded above the lateral Second dorsal and anal fins beginning to elongate 45

Comparisons by size and features eye diameter Yellowfin and Bigeye (~ 45 cm) Bigeye eye is larer than yellowfin, extending down towards corner of mouth YFT BET 46

Comparisons by size and features body shape Yellowfin (~ 90 cm) Long, narrow body, small head, small eye Closely spaced, chevron pattern of alternating lines and rows of spots disappeared Bigeye (~ 90cm) Large, deep head, large eye, deeply rounded body Long pectoral fin with thin, pointed tip Vertical, widely spaced irregular white lines disappeared 47

Comparisons by size and features - combined Bigeye (99 cm) Deep, rounded body outline, large, deep head, large eye Long pectoral fin, thin, pointed, wavy tip Trailing edge of caudal fin flat Yellowfin (104 cm) Long, narrow body, straight behind 2 nd dorsal, small head and eye Evenly spaced lines and rows of uniform dots Noticeable V notch in caudal fin with two raised areas 2 nd dorsal and anal fins beginning to elongate Note: the bigeye has lost all body markings and yellow coloration 48

Mixed fish on deck External Characteristics The sampler/observer must be alert to changes in size and species compositions during the brailing process, when moving tuna from the net to fish wells and during unloading, and record these changes as they occur. In order to do so, the ability to quickly determine tuna species under a variety of conditions is necessary. Using the criteria outlined in this handbook, positive identifications should be possible using only external characteristics. If in doubt, cut the fish and check the liver. 49

Mixed fish from ringnet vessel self test photo: A.D. Lewis 50

Mixed fish on purse seine deck self test 51

Mixed fish from troller self test 52

Mixed fish from purse seiner self test (brine frozen) 53

Dinner fish self test External Characteristics photo: A.D. Lewis 54

Mixed fish self test (all different species) photo: A.D. Lewis 55

Note: The tuna samples illustrated in this guide are in good to excellent condition making identifications easy and straight forward. With practice, port samplers and observers should be able to make positive identifications from fish in a wide range of condition using external characteristics alone. Remember: Identifications should be based on a combination of features appropriate to the particular sample being examined and not just a single feature. If doubt remains, the fish should be set aside and examined for internal characteristics. END 56