CUPSIM Water Supply Variability Study All information subject to change.

Similar documents
COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Tuesday, January 11, :11 AM (CST)

Utility Debt Securitization Authority 2013 T/TE Billed Revenues Tracking Report

Colorado River Drought Response and System Sustainability. Chuck Cullom July 16, 2014

2018 HR & PAYROLL Deadlines

MAR DASHBOARD MAR. Compliant % Breakdown Mar % Late % On-time MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Utah Ag Bankers Conference Alfalfa and Dairy Outlook

Wisconsin 511 Traveler Information Annual Usage Summary January 3, Wisconsin 511 Phone Usage ( )

DEC DASHBOARD. Positive Response Compliance DEC. Compliant Tickets : On-Time Performance Analysis. December % Late.

JAN DASHBOARD. Positive Response Compliance JAN. Compliant Tickets : On-Time Performance Analysis. January % Late.

Weather and Climate Impacts on Water Supply

Assessing salmon vulnerability to climate change

NEVADA SLOT MACHINES: HISTORICAL HOLD PERCENTAGE VARIATIONS ANNUAL AND MONTHLY HOLD PERCENTAGES, CENTER FOR GAMING RESEARCH, NOVEMBER 2017

3. EXCEL FORMULAS & TABLES

Drought! When Do We Know It s Over?

JULY 2013 RIDERSHIP REPORT MTA METRO-NORTH RAILROAD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

GAZIFÈRE INC. Prime Rate Forecasting Process 2015 Rate Case

Drought and the Climate of the Ogallala Aquifer

Properties. terc.ucdavis.edu 8

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

Bluetongue Disease (BT)

Presented to Idaho Washington Aquifer Collaborative February 11, Spokane River Project License

Rural Energy Conference Planning the Construction of Lake Dorothy Hydro By Tim McLeod President Alaska Electric Light and Power

Wind Resource Assessment for CHEFORNAK, ALASKA

Drought or Not? Nolan J. Doesken Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University

Colorado Weather and Climate Update

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST

Drought: What is the Status?

The State of the Climate Address

Lamb Market Outlook. ASI New Orleans, TX January 25, David P. Anderson Professor and Extension Economist

3. EXCEL FORMULAS & TABLES


Manitoba Water Stewardship. Coping with Drought. Drought Research Initiative Workshop. Inn at the Forks, Winnipeg. A.A. Warkentin. January 11-13, 2007

Staying in Tune with South Florida s Water Cycle for Scientists, Managers, and Policy Makers in 5 Minutes per Week

SEASONAL PRICES for TENNESSEE FEEDER CATTLE and COWS

September 2017 MLS Statistical Report. Residential Inventory

AcquaTailings: A Tool for Streamlining Mining Water Budget

CoCoRaHS goes to the Colorado Farm Show

Liquefied Natural Gas: Current Trends and Future Directions

SWISS reports stable load factors

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Precipitation Patterns in South Park

Hydrological Condition Report including the issues of High Flow Fluctuation in Chiang Saen

Lake Taneycomo Fisheries Management. Shane Bush : Fisheries Management Biologist

Little Athletics NSW. 2018/2019 Season. Age Group Information Handbook / 1

Nolan Doesken Colorado Climate Center

Wind Data Verification Report Arriga 50m

Nasdaq Dubai AED TRADING HOLIDAYS AND SETTLEMENT CALENDAR 2018 For Equities Outsourced to the DFM (T+2)

Preston s Edmond Market Report

PUBLIC MEETINGS. Please see the City of Geneva Public Meeting Guide for more information regarding City Council and Committee of the Whole meetings.

The effects of mainstem flow, water velocity and spill on salmon and steelhead populations of the Columbia River

NCC Cable System Order

Understanding Rider Differences in Mileage and Riding Frequency through the MSF100 Motorcyclists Naturalistic Study.

Monthly Webinar 12.07/2010

Site Description: LOCATION DETAILS Report Prepared By: Tower Site Report Date

Adaptation to climate variation in a diversified fishery:

Groundwater Management Optimization. Dr. Issam NOUIRI

Goldman Sachs Agricultural Biotech Forum New York, NY. March 7, 2012

FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, MARCH 30 AT 5 AM

Swine Market Outlook

NASDAQ DUBAI TRADING HOLIDAYS AND SETTLEMENT CALENDAR 2018 For Equities Outsourced to the DFM (T+2)

Site Description: Tower Site

Water budgets of the two Olentangy River experimental wetlands in 2001

b Number issued 200,000 (marked with * in the attached appendix) Exercise price is as set out in the appendix

The Awesome, Wonderful, Beautiful, Exciting and Terrible Climate of the West What a Hoot!

Calendar On US Federal Reserve Holidays, no settlements will take place for USD.

Albeni Falls Dam Downstream Water Temperature Study Interim Results

Eric Jones Fish Hatchery Manager II Ca. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife

Mr. Joseph J. Lhota Chairman Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2 Broadway New York, NY Re: Train On-Time Performance Report 2017-F-8

Eulachon: State of the Science and Science to Policy Forum

CCoWS. Central Coast Watershed Studies. Summary of Precipitation and Streamflow for Potrero and San Clemente Creeks in 2010

Southern Lodging Summit Memphis, TN. Presented by Randy Smith Founder Smith Travel Research

County of Orange Resources and Development Management Department Harbors, Beaches and Parks. Strategic Plan. HBP Strategic Plan Workshop 1.

African swine fever in domestic pigs and wild boar (ASF)

PROPOSED EP BOWLS CALENDAR; January 2019 Version 2 Approved 22 November 2018

Emilie Nelson Wes Yeomans New York Independent System Operator Market Issues Working Group NYISO Krey Corporate Center May 13, 2010

Manufacturers Continue Capacity Expansion as Technology Orders Grow

Global Climate Change: Just the Facts

Bird strikes Swedish Airspace

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Greater Las Vegas Snapshot by Sale Type Last Month's Sold

Estimation of polluted area in case of potential leakage of the chemical munitions

Mutton Snapper Public Workshops February Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Division of Marine Fisheries Management

Manufacturers continue capacity expansion as technology orders grow

Hospitality Outlook Asheville, NC

Nolan Doesken. Colorado Climate Center.

Hard Shoulder Running is a valuable tool July 14, Dean H. Gustafson, PE, PTOE State Operations Engineer VDOT Operations Division

Dr. Vera Potop & Prof. Josef Soukup

May 2018 MLS Statistical Report

Greater Las Vegas Snapshot by Sale Type Last Month's Sold

Greater Las Vegas Snapshot by Sale Type Last Month's Sold

July 2015 Sept Cork City Pedestrian Counter Report

Greater Las Vegas Snapshot by Sale Type Last Month's Sold

Warming trends of ocean temperatures off the WA coast and implications for fisheries. Nick Caputi Alan Pearce, Rod Lenanton, Ming Feng

ENERGY BILL ORGANIZATION

Greater Manchester Police Hate Crime and Hate Incident Data 01/04/14 to 31/03/15

Cattle and Beef Markets: Short and Long Run Challenges and Opportunities

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: WORLD AFFAIRS

January 2017 Calendar MAJORS FIELD LITTLE LEAGUE

Transcription:

. 1

IN A NUTSHELL The CUP Water Supply Variability Study is an opportunistic, proactive example of responsible water system management The CUP is very complex and approaching full demand The study capitalizes on previous major studies The study develops an operational management tool that will aid in system operation in times of potential shortage. 2

WHAT ARE THE GOALS OF THIS STUDY? IMPROVE the reliability of the Central Utah Project water supply operations by: 1) Evaluating the combinations of meteorological and operational conditions that stress the system. 2) Understanding the sensitivity to conditions that are more adverse than those that have been observed. 3) Developing operational criteria and plans to aid in operating the system during such adverse conditions.. 3

THE CENTRAL UTAH PROJECT 4

THE CENTRAL UTAH PROJECT 5

PROJECT PURPOSE 1. Improve understanding of severe drought conditions. Develop tool and procedures to aid in recognizing and responding to adverse conditions. 2. Examine the likelihood of future lower inflows Estimate the probability of extreme drought. 3. Aid in decision making Protect the reliability of water supplies by proactive response. Predict the probability of not meeting demands. 4. Educate the public about the potential for supply variability 6

PROJECT PURPOSE 1. Improve understanding of severe drought conditions. Develop tool and procedures to aid in recognizing and responding to adverse conditions. 2. Examine the likelihood of future lower inflows Estimate the probability of extreme drought. 3. Aid in decision making Protect the reliability of water supplies by proactive response. Predict the probability of not meeting demands. 4. Educate the public about the potential for supply variability 7

PROJECT PURPOSE 1. Improve understanding of severe drought conditions. Develop tool and procedures to aid in recognizing and responding to adverse conditions. 2. Examine the likelihood of future lower inflows Estimate the probability of extreme drought. 3. Aid in decision making Protect the reliability of water supplies by proactive response. Predict the probability of not meeting demands. 4. Educate the public about the potential for supply variability 8

PROJECT PURPOSE 1. Improve understanding of severe drought conditions. Develop tool and procedures to aid in recognizing and responding to adverse conditions. 2. Examine the likelihood of future lower inflows Estimate the probability of extreme drought. 3. Aid in decision making Protect the reliability of water supplies by proactive response. Predict the probability of not meeting demands. 4. Educate the public about the potential for supply variability 9

STUDY COMPONENTS Develop RiverWare Model Develop Historical Hydrology Develop Adverse Hydrology Develop Predictive Model Capabilities 10

System Overview and CUPSIM Model Schematic 11

HISTORICAL HYDROLOGY Inflows and Demands taken from PROSIM Model plus Bonneville Unit Definite Plan Report Data Extended to 1950 2009 by correlation 15 Inflow Nodes, 20 Demands, 5 Reservoirs (with up to four accounts each) 12

ADVERSE HYDROLOGY DEVELOPMENT Three Datasets Developed 60 years of ADVERSE Hydrology: Observed Resampled Approach Paleo Sampled Approach Downscaled GCM Projected Approach 13

OBSERVED RESAMPLED HYDROLOGY Annual Volume in acre-feet 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 Historic and Observed Resampled Annual Flow - CUPSIM Node 1 All flows in the Strawberry and Duchesne River basins are 25% less in years 2001-2009 0 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Historic Annuals Historic Average Adjusted Annuals Adjusted Average 14

PALEO SAMPLED HYDROLOGY Annual Volume in acre-feet 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 Historic and Adjusted Annual Natural Flow - Future Pattern - CUPSIM Node 1 0 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Historic Annuals Historic Average Adjusted Annuals Adjusted Average 15

GCM PROJECTED HYDROLOGY CMIP3 Runoff Changes - Miroc3_2_medres (B1) 45% 40% 35% Percent of monthly runoff 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep CMIP3 1950-2009 CMIP3 2020-2079 Natural Flow 1950-2009 16

Annual Volume in acre-feet 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 GCM PROJECTED HYDROLOGY Historic and Adjusted Annual Natural Flow - Future Pattern - CUPSIM Node 1 0 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Historic Annuals Historic Average Adjusted Annuals Adjusted Average 17

300,000 300,000 SUMMARY OF ADVERSE HYDROLOGY Historic Historic and and Adjusted Adjusted Annual Annual Natural Flow -CUPSIM Node Node 1 --Ordered Ordered 250,000 250,000 ANNUAL VOLUME, IN ACRE-FEET ANNUAL VOLUME, IN ACRE-FEET 200,000 200,000 150,000 150,000 100,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 Historic Historic Observed Observed Resampled Resampled Paleo Paleo Sampled Sampled GCM GCM Projected Projected 0 0 00 10 10 20 20 30 40 40 50 50 60 60 DRIEST TO TO WETTEST WETEST YEARS YEARS 18

CUPSIM MODEL RESULTS 19

350000 300000 CUPSIM Model Simulation Jordanelle Reservoir Storage: Historical vs. Paleo Sampled CUPSIM MODEL RESULTS 250000 Volume [acre-feet] 200000 150000 100000 50000 Averages: Historical : 213,000 acre-ft Adverse: 209,000 acre-ft Difference : -2% Adverse Historical Adverse Average Historical Average 0 1950 1954 1958 1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030 2034 2038 2042 2046 2050 2054 2058 Date [month] 20

350000 300000 CUPSIM Model Simulation Jordanelle Reservoir Storage: Historical vs. Downscaled GCM CUPSIM MODEL RESULTS 250000 Volume [acre-feet] 200000 150000 100000 50000 Averages: Historical : 213,000 acre-ft Adverse: 197,000 acre-ft Difference : -8% Adverse Historical Adverse Average Historical Average 0 1950 1954 1958 1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030 2034 2038 2042 2046 2050 2054 2058 Date [month] 21

QUESTIONS? Cort Lambson, CUWCD Project Manager Phone: 801-226-7100 Email: cort@cuwcd.com Steve Thurin, HDR Project Manager Phone: 435-659-1872 Email: steven.thurin@hdrinc.com 22 CUPSIM Water Supply Variability Study. All information subject to change.