Inspection of Clarence City Beaches following Winter 2011 Storm Events

Similar documents
Beach profile surveys and morphological change, Otago Harbour entrance to Karitane May 2014 to June 2015

Australian Coastal Councils Conference

Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

RE: Hurricane Matthew Beach Damage Assessment and Recommendations [CSE 2416]

To: William Woods, Jenni Austin Job No: CentrePort Harbour Deepening Project - Comments on community queries

NORTHERN CELL OPTIONS SHORTLIST RECOMMENDATIONS

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN OF COASTAL STRUCTURES

Appendix M: Durras Lake Tailwater Conditions

SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED MANAGEMENT OPTION FOR STOCKTON BEACH APPLICATION OF 2D COASTAL PROCESSES MODELLING

Building Coastal Resiliency at Plymouth Long Beach

Implications of proposed Whanganui Port and lower Whanganui River dredging

Estuarine Shoreline Stabilization

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet, Long Beach Island, NY Construction Update

REVETMENTS. Purposes and Operational Constraints. Purposes Erosion control o o. Revetment Design 4/5/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering

Coastal Change and Conflict

COASTAL MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION METHODS! 1

A REVIEW OF THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES AS A RESULT OF HURRICANE SANDY IN THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

ST LEONARDS COASTAL HAZARD VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

INTRODUCTION TO COASTAL ENGINEERING

FINAL REPORT FOR 2013 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL OCEANFRONT BEACHES THE BOROUGH OF AVALON, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Performance of Upham Beach T-Groin Project and Its Impact to the Downdrift Beach

Shorelines Earth - Chapter 20 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

Beach, dune and development in the Borough of Mantoloking as of January Prepared for The Borough of Mantoloking: April 2, 2008

SPECIAL SPRING 2018 STORM REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES FOR THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

DUNE STABILIZATION AND BEACH EROSION

Soft Designs for a Harsh Climate: Trends in Coastal Engineering

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

ATLANTIC COUNTY 2006 to 2008

The Dynamic Coast. Right Place Resources. A presentation about the interaction between the dynamic coast and people

Emergency Coastal Protection Works Practical Lessons For The Future From The Past

# Post Consultation and Submissions Resource Consent Conditions for Surfing Impact Mitigation August 2016

Blakely Island, N Thatcher Bay. Restoration Recommendation: Rank Score (total score)

INUNDATION, RUN-UP HEIGHTS, CROSS-SECTION PROFILES AND LITTORAL ENVIRONMENT ALONG THE TAMIL NADU COAST AFTER 26 TH DECEMBER 2004 TSUNAMI

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

Dune Monitoring Data Update Summary: 2013

Reading Material. Inshore oceanography, Anikouchine and Sternberg The World Ocean, Prentice-Hall

Figure 106. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

INVESTIGATING STRATEGIES TO REPAIR HISTORIC TIDE WALLS ON THE CLARENCE RIVER AND ADJACENT BEACH AND RIVER BANK PROTECTION

Photo by: Darryl Hatheway, 2011

COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS. 454 lecture 12

Impacts of breakwaters and training walls

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Atlantic County Profile Site Locations

Chapter 10 Lecture Outline. The Restless Oceans

COASTAL HAZARDS. What are Coastal Hazards?

Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (NHC) is pleased to submit this assessment of the wave climate at Lazo Road, Comox.

INFLUENCE OF DAMAGED GROINS ON NOURISHED SEASHORE

DUXBURY WAVE MODELING STUDY

4.1 Analysis of Shoreline Surveys

Delaware Chapter Surfrider Foundation - Indian River Inlet Monitoring

Impact of Hurricane Matthew on the Atlantic Coast of Florida

Q1. What are the primary causes/contributors to coastal erosion at Westshore and the concept of longshore / littoral drift.

Figure79. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 155

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

MODELLING COASTAL PROCESSES AND HAZARDS TO ASSESS SEA LEVEL RISE IMPACTS FOR INTEGRATION INTO A PLANNING SCHEME

National Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Program Overview

Inlet Management Study for Pass-A-Grille and Bunces Pass, Pinellas County, Florida

Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for Byron Shire Coastline

ST. JOSEPH PENINSULA, GULF COUNTY, FLORIDA Beach Re-Nourishment and Environmental Enhancement Project RECOMMENDATIONS

Shoreline Response to an Offshore Wave Screen, Blairgowrie Safe Boat Harbour, Victoria, Australia

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 15 Earth Science, 12e Tarbuck/Lutgens

Montserrat. Wise practices for coping with. i b bea n Se a

Water Research Laboratory (WRL), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Australia, Manly Vale, NSW 2

Future Coasts Port Fairy Coastal Hazard Assessment

Basic Dune Physical Characteristics

The Sand Beaches of New Hampshire and Maine

Chapter. The Dynamic Ocean

2016 NC Coastal Local Governments Annual Meeting

Habitat Development: Habitat Boulders Lawson Pier Foreshore Enhancement

April 7, Prepared for: The Caribbean Disaster Emergency Response Agency Prepared by: CEAC Solutions Co. Ltd.

Coastal Processes Day Criccieth

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Ocean County Profile Site Locations

Earth Science Chapter 16 Section 3 Review

Appendix D: SWAN Wave Modelling

Identify one factor which influences wave strength (1 Mark) Factors which affect wave strength

Environmental Protection on the Gold Coast of Queensland, Australia. 1. What is the appeal of the Gold Coast to tourists?

Report. Westshore Beach: Regrading, Napier. March Prepared for. Napier City Council

RI Regulatory Setbacks & Buffers: Coastal Management Issues

City of Del Mar Local Coastal Plan (LCP) Amendment for Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding

Label the diagram below with long fetch and short fetch:

LOCALLY CONCENTRATED SEVERE BEACH EROSION ON SEISHO COAST CAUSED BY TYPHOON T0709

Overview. Beach Features. Coastal Regions. Other Beach Profile Features. CHAPTER 10 The Coast: Beaches and Shoreline Processes.

Figure 41. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

Dunsborough region boating facility planning study SUMMARY report

2014 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

General Coastal Notes + Landforms! 1

PUBLIC EXHIBITION OF COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR COLLAROY-NARRABEEN BEACH AND FISHERMANS BEACH

Town of Duck, North Carolina

RAINBOW BAY FIELD REPORT

Case study 64. Shoreham Harbour Shingle Bypassing and Recycling

Absecon Island Shore Protection The planning behind the project

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

COASTAL SYSTEMS WAVE ENERGY

LAB: WHERE S THE BEACH

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

GONE! Coastal Erosion Happens During Storms! Why Worry About Coastal Setbacks? Goals for Today

Bay County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. May 14, 2018

AN OVERVIEW OF RECENT PROJECTS RELATED TO SAND BUDGETS, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BEACHES

Transcription:

18 July 2011 WRL Ref: WRL10086TDS L20110718 Messrs P Watson & I Preece Clarence City Council PO Box 96 Rosny Park TAS 7018 By email: pwatson@ccc.tas.gov.au ipreece@ccc.tas.gov.au Dear Phil/Ian, Inspection of Clarence City Beaches following Winter 2011 Storm Events A series of large storm events which have occurred during June and July 2011 have caused erosion and inundation along stretches of coastline within Clarence City. WRL staff inspected Roches Beach and Cremorne on Thursday 14 July to assess damage and to assist Council in formulating a response to any immediate hazards evident on site. This letter details on-site observations, attempts to quantify the severity of the event using available data and literature and provides recommendations for future work priorities. 1. Winter 2011 Storm Events 1.1 June 8 Storm Event A small, intense low pressure system passed below Tasmania on 7 th /8 th June 2011. The system had a central pressure of 998 hpa with tight pressure gradients causing very strong south to southwesterly local winds (Figure 1). This resulted in a significant wave height (H s ) up to 10.7 m and Peak Period of 14.5 s being recorded at the Cape Sorell Wave Buoy (Figure 2) located off the West Coast of Tasmania. Based on extreme values calculated for this location by Shand et al. (2011), this peak wave height has an average recurrence interval of approximately 8 years. Based on a wave group velocity of 11 ms -1 for the spectral peak period of 14 s, the storm peak is likely to reach Frederick Henry Bay and the Clarence City Coastline 4 to 6 hours after being observed at the Cape Sorell wave buoy. The storm peak wave height is therefore likely to have reached the Clarence City Beaches in the early hours of Wednesday 8 th June. The high astronomical tide was predicted to reach 1.29 m Hobart LAT (0.46 m AHD) at 0007 8 June 2011 (NTC, 2011; Figure 3). This predicted tide falls between a mean higher high water (MHHW) and mean lower high water (MLHW) tide (Australian National Tide Tables, 2009). Storm surge levels during the event have not been assessed but could be done at a later date after gathering additional data.

Figure 1 MSLP Chart for 7 June 2011 (source: BoM 2011) Figure 2 Wave height and period recorded at the Cape Sorell wave buoy 6 10 June 2011 (source: BoM, 2011) WRL10086TDS L20110718 2

Figure 3 Predicted Astronomical Tides for Hobart (m LAT), source: BoM (2011) 1.2 July 9/10 Storm Event In contrast to the June 2011 event, the July event was forced by an extremely large mid latitude cyclonic weather system centred at 55 S with a central pressure of 962 hpa (Figure 5). A fetch length of over 1500 km forced large and long period waves from a south-west direction towards Tasmania. The Cape Sorell wave buoy recorded a peak significant wave height of 10.0 m at 1300, 9 th July with an associated peak period of 17.5 s (Figure 6). This peak Hs wave height is equivalent to a 4 year average recurrence interval (ARI) event based on Shand et al. (2011) but the long duration of large waves during this storm event is more exceptional, with waves over 7 m sustained for 48 hours with an ARI of around 40 years. Wave direction is critical in terms of wave propagation into Frederick Henry Bay, with studies using nearshore wave models (Shand and Carley, 2011) showing offshore waves from the south to be more efficient in reaching Roches Beach. While the Cape Sorell wave buoy does not record wave direction, the fetch direction indicates the waves likely arrived from the south-west and may have therefore been slightly less effective at propagating to Roches Beach than storms of a more southerly direction. While the storm peak likely reached Clarence Beaches on the afternoon and evening of the 9 th July, sustained large waves persisted through the next two days. High tides during this period were predicted to reach up to 1.51 m LAT (0.64 m AHD) excluding storm surge at 1535 on 10 July (Figure 4). Additional storm surge analysis could be undertaken. This corresponds to a mean higher high water tide and while the joint probability of this water level coinciding with an event of this magnitude has not been undertaken, the probability is expected to be very low due to the general independence of astronomical tide and wave height. Figure 4 Predicted Astronomical Tides for Hobart (m LAT) (source: BoM, 2011) WRL10086TDS L20110718 3

Figure 5 MSLP Chart for 8 July 2011 (source: BoM 2011) Figure 6 Wave height and period recorded at the Cape Sorell wave buoy 7 11 June 2011 (source: BoM, 2011) WRL10086TDS L20110718 4

2. Site Observations Roches Beach and Cremorne Beach were inspected by Dr Tom Shand, of the Water Research Laboratory together with Clarence City Council staff on Thursday 14 th July. Both beaches appeared in generally eroded states with recent storm scarps evident in the foredune along most of the beaches. Key observations along the sites (from north to south) include: Roches Beach An accumulation of sediment noted immediately south of the Lauderdale Yacht Club in front of the stream entrance; The footbridge over the stream was destroyed during the event, possibly due to wave run-up impacts; Substantial runup of the backshore vegetation between Bambra Reef and the Yacht Club (Photograph 1); Erosion to the north of Bambra Reef (Photograph 1) and evidence of large overtopping flows (Photograph 2). This is likely due to the combination of large waves and elevated water levels reducing the effectiveness of Bambra Reef in reducing transmitted wave energy; Newly placed riprap rock at No. 1 Bambra St (Photograph 3). The structural integrity or appropriateness of wall design was not assessed within this inspection, although rock appeared slightly undersize and a geotextile underlay was not observed; Substantial recent erosion of land immediately south of the rock wall fronting No. 2 Bambra St. (Photograph 4) including where a small (undersize) sandbag wall was formerly located. This erosion scarp is up to 2 m high in places, and places the fence line and possibly other structures at No. 2 Bambra St within a zone of reduced foundation capacity; Over-steepened dune scarps of up to 1.5 m high along much of Northern Roches Beach (Photograph 5) posing a possible stability hazard to pedestrians; Small hessian sandbags placed along dune crest at No. 118 Balook Street (Photograph 6). While these bags may assist in reducing overtopping volumes for smaller waves by elevating the crest level, they are substantially smaller than the 0.75 or 2.5 m3 geobags typically used for coastal protection and are unlikely to survive large wave impacts. The Hessian material will also decay over time; Many areas of overtopping evident, particularly at low points in the dune crest. Particularly severe overtopping apparently occurred at Balanada Street where additional sand has since been placed to raise the crest level (Photograph 7); Long vegetation behind the dune crest, particularly marram or native grasses, appears to have substantially reduced the extent of overtopping flows with little damage to the vegetation evident; Substantial runup flows into the car park at Lauderdale canal due primarily to the low elevation of the concrete boat ramp; Erosion at either end of the low geotextile and timber retaining wall near the Lauderdale canal car park; Continued erosion and over-steepened dune scarps between the Lauderdale canal car park and the southern revetment; The southern revetment now holds land at least 5 m further seaward than the adjacent shoreline (Photograph 8); The northern part of the revetment where rocks are generally larger appears to be structurally stable, although is in imminent danger of being outflanked by adjacent erosion to the north (Photograph 9); WRL10086TDS L20110718 5

Further south along the revetment, substantial slumping of the rock riprap has occurred due to undermining of the toe. Erosion of the backing land is evident where waves have overtopped the lowered wall (Photograph 10) and substantial overtopping flows were evident in the backshore. These overtopping flows have been particularly severe behind the concrete boat ramp which has assisted runup through minimal energy dissipation; Many of the riprap rocks appear to have broken during this and other past events, further reducing the average rock size and the structural integrity of the wall. While the wall appears to be largely fulfilling its intended purpose, it is progressively failing; Overall, recent storm events appear to have removed between 1 and 10 m 3 per metre of beach length (subject to confirmation by survey) from the upper beach. Much of the eroded sand appears to have been moved offshore below the low tide mark. This sand will likely return over time, dependent on future wave climate, but the persistent northward littoral drift may remove some material from the system before recovery. Cremorne Erosion of the dune has undermined a corner of a boat shed at No. 62 Frederick Henry Parade (Photograph 11); Concrete block and timber walls along Frederick Henry Parade damaged by wave runup (Photograph 12); Higher dune systems have limited most overtopping along the central and southern portions of the beach but over-steepened erosion scarps are evident reaching over 2 m at the southern end (Photograph 13); Difficult foot access around the southern end of Cremorne Spit with erosion continuing around the distal (southern) tip. 3. Recommended work priorities The following future work priorities are recommended to reduce imminent and medium to long-term hazard to property and infrastructure along Cremorne and Roches Beach: Immediate Survey beach and analyse data to quantify change; Reduce hazard posed by over-steepened dune scarps along Cremorne and Roches Beach by a combination of limited beach scraping immediately in front of scarp (~0.5 to 1 m 3 /linear m of beach length) and pulling seaward of over-steepened scarp crest. This should be undertaken in a manner to preserve vegetation and root system where possible. Short Term (6 months 1 year) Import sand to raise low points in dune crest along Roches Beach and revegetate with native grasses and sand binding species; Place sand (up to 10 m 3 /li m) in critically eroded locations such as adjacent to the Bambra Street revetments and immediately north of the southern revetment. This sand could be imported or obtained in limited quantities from deposits at the southern end of Roches Beach and north of Bambra Reef (estimated up to 500m 3 available at each); Limited repair of southern revetment by pushing existing slumped materials into steeper slope (~1V:2H); Siting of beach access steps further landward to reflect new shoreline position; WRL10086TDS L20110718 6

Identify rock sources for possible future use. Assess potential rock for available size and durability; Identify possible land or offshore sand sources and estimate costs to transport and place on beach (initial start-up and subsequent per m3). Medium Term (2-5 years) Moderate beach nourishment to replace volume lost during recent events of 2010 and 2011 (5000 10,000m3) from offshore or land-based source; Trial geotextile groyne structure with pre-fill nourishment and associated beach monitoring to assess effect and assist in design of more extensive works; Consideration of emergency geotextile or rock wall at severely eroded locations at Bambra Street; Local Government Association Project of Tasmania (LGAT) project to consider long-term management strategies for Cremorne and Roches Beach. The fundamental issue resolved during this process should be whether to Protect (e.g. seawall or backstop wall, major nourishment, groynes, etc.), Accommodate (minor nourishment, scraping, etc.) or Retreat (do nothing or managed retreat) in the long-term. Long-term (>5 years) Subject to outcomes of ALGAT project but, if a decision is made to Accommodate or Protect, works may include: o Raising of dune crests to counter increased future run-up elevations with sea level rise; o Ongoing nourishment/sand relocation to counter sediment deficit and longshore movement with or without control structures depending on community sentiment and coupled physical-economic modelling; o Engineered backstop wall to limit shoreline retreat past a defined position. 4. Summary Please do not hesitate to contact Dr Tom Shand or James Carley on 02 8071 9800 to discuss any aspects of the above letter report or if you require further information. Yours sincerely, B M Miller Manager WRL10086TDS L20110718 7

References Bureau of Meteorology. 2011. Analysis Chart Archive. http://www.bom.gov.au/australia/charts/archive/index.shtml Bureau of Meteorology. 2011. Cape Sorell Waverider Buoy Observations. http://www.bom.gov.au/products/idt65014.shtml Bureau of Meteorology. 2011. Tide Predictions for Tasmania. http://www.bom.gov.au/oceanography/tides/maps/tas.shtml Shand, T D, Mole, M A, Carley, J T, Peirson, W L and Cox, R J (2011), Coastal Storm Data Analysis: Provision of Extreme Wave Data for Adaptation Planning. Report prepared for the Australian Climate Change Adaptation Research Network for Settlements and Infrastructure (ACCARNSI). WRL RR242, 53p + Appendices. Shand, T D and Carley, J T (2011). Roches Beach Hazard Line Reassessment. Report prepared for Clarence City Council WRL TR2011/05, 34p + Appendices. WRL10086TDS L20110718 8

Site Photographs 14 June 2011 Photograph 1 Erosion north of Bambra Reef Photograph 2 Wave overtopping north of Bambra Reef resulting from run-up WRL10086TDS L20110718 9

Photograph 3 Bambra Reef and either newly placed riprap rock evident at end of Bambra St (photo: M. Dell, 15 July 2011) Photograph 4 Erosion immediately south of rock revetment fronting No. 2 Bambra Street WRL10086TDS L20110718 10

Photograph 5 Over-steepened dune scarps of up to 1.5 m high along much of Northern Roches Beach Photograph 6 Small hessian sandbags placed along dune crest at No. 118 Balook Street WRL10086TDS L20110718 11

Photograph 7 Additional sand placed to raise the crest level at Balanada Street Photograph 8 Southern revetment now holds land at least 5 m further seaward than adjacent shoreline WRL10086TDS L20110718 12

Photograph 9 Northern end of southern revetment with outflanking evident (Photo: M. Dell, 15 July 2011) Photograph 10 Erosion of land backing the southern revetment evident where waves have overtopped the lowered wall WRL10086TDS L20110718 13

Photograph 11 Erosion of the dune has undermined a corner of a boat shed at No. 62 Frederick Henry Parade Photograph 12 Timber wall along Frederick Henry Parade damaged by wave runup WRL10086TDS L20110718 14

Photograph 13 Over-steepened erosion scarps reach over 2 m at the southern end of Cremorne Beach WRL10086TDS L20110718 15