Cocahoe Economics Fact Sheet

Similar documents
Previous Work on the Culture of the Cocahoe Minnow Fundulus grandis

Economic Modeling of Walleye and Hybrid Walleye Production Protocols

Yellow Perch Broodstock. Geoff Wallat, Aquaculture Specialist

Broodstock and Hatchery Management

Marine Aquaculture Opportunities for NC. Chuck Weirich NC Sea Grant

Sunfish / Bluegill Fillets - 5 lbs Price: $87.00 Skin on Fillets - Individually Frozen 2012 source: internet

Cocahoe Minnow. Production Manual

SGS, LLC AQUACULTURE

80:20 Pond Growth Performance of Hybrid Tilapia on Soybean Meal-Based Diets

Propagating and Selling Fish

HSWRI Aquaculture Program Research Report **** June & July 2012 ****

UW- STEVENS POINT NORTHERN AQUACULTURE DEMONSTRATION FACILITY

Updated August Becoming a Fish-Farmer (Aquaculturist) NYSG Lesson Plan

Auburn University. Marine Extension. & Research Center SEA GRANT EXTENSION. Circular ANR-805 MASG P

Burbot Conservation Aquaculture at The Kootenai Tribe of Idaho s Hatchery 2 - Twin Rivers Hatchery

The University of Georgia

Trout Production at the Bobby N. Setzer Fish Hatchery

Northern Aquaculture Demonstration Facility 2014 Walleye Project

Presentation to : Marine Aquaculture Task Force 2006

Striped Bass and White Hybrid (x) Striped Bass Management and Fishing in Pennsylvania

CHANNEL CATFISH CULTURE IN THE UNITED STATES. Leonard Lovshin Department of Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures Auburn University, AL 36849

Intensive Production of Hybrid Walleye(Sander vitreus x S. canadense) in a Recycle Water System

Appendix B General Explanation and Report Form

Winter Culture of Caged Rainbow Trout in the South.

Restoring Migratory Fish to Rhode Island s Rivers and Streams. Outline

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study

Aquaculture and Aquatic Resources Management (AARM) of AIT: Tilapia Research. Amrit Bart

The UK Experience with use of Triploids for Restocking

Kokanee Captive Broodstock at Spokane Hatchery

TAY DISTRICT SALMON FISHERIES BOARD POLICY ON SALMON STOCKING

Inshore wrasse pot fishery What are the issues?

THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION FROM HORSES

Eric Jones Fish Hatchery Manager II Ca. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife

Winter Culture of Caged Rainbow Trout in the South.

U. S. House of Representatives Committee on Resources. Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans

Report Outlined Improvements to: Shepherd of the Hills Hatchery Montauk Hatchery Bennett Spring Hatchery Roaring River Hatchery Maramec Spring Park

Why walleye culture?

Hybrid Walleye (Saugeye)- The Wisconsin Experience. Why Walleye? High market value Wide-spread reputation as a food fish Limited domestic supply

Use of hatcheries to increase production of sea cucumbers

Business Plan Presentation

Larvae Overboard on Shell. Dudley Biddlecomb s experiments using larvae from Mike Congrove

Conservation aquaculture: a critical tool for recovery of burbot in the Kootenai River

Mirror Carp Fingerling to Market Production in Ponds in Harbin with Soy-Based Feeds

Hatcheries: Role in Restoration and Enhancement of Salmon Populations

Production of juveniles for RAS ongrowing farms with a combined system using POND / RAS. T. Policar, J. Křišťan, M. Blecha, O.

Catfish Industry. The Delta. ANS 18 - CATFISH vs BASA 1

Management of Open Water Resources: A Strategy for Sustainable Food Through Culture Based Fisheries (CBF)

OCEAN RANCHING NATIVE BROTHERHOOD OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (NBBC)

Potomac River Fisheries Commission s. American Shad Fishing / Recovery Plan. Submitted to the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Hatchery based aquaculture in Palau

Lingcod* Culture. * and friends. Aquaculture Program Northwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries Service Seattle, Washington

Iowa DNR Advanced Fingerling Walleye Culture. J. Alan Johnson Rathbun Fish Hatchery and Research Facility, Moravia, IA

Kirt Hughes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 6 - Fish Program Manager

Gregory Fischer, Facility Operations Manager. University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Northern Aquaculture Demonstration Facility

SEA CUCUMBER AQUACULTURE RESEARCH

STOCKING RATIOS OF HYBRID CATFISH (Clarias macrocephalus x C. Gariepinus) AND NILE TILAPIA (Oreochromis niloticus) IN INTENSIVE POLYCULTURE SYSTEM

Outlook for Muskellunge, Northern Pike, and Chain Pickerel Culture in Kentucky

FINFISH PRODUCTION STATUS OF CHIANGMAI PROVINCE, NORTHERN THAILAND Thepparath Ungsethaphand 1, Prachaub Chaibu 1 and Sudpranee Maneesri 2

A CONTEMPORARY PLAN FOR MANAGING WHITE SEABASS BROODSTOCK AND PRODUCTION COHORTS FOR THE OREHP

Commercial Net Pen Salmon Farming in Washington State

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

POMPANO MARICULTURE: PAST SUCCESS AND PRESENT OPPORTUNITIES

~ Origin & Goals. Paul Rawson, Dale Leavitt, Dana Morse & Diane Murphy

Evaluation of the Sunray Venus. Aquaculture in Florida

Brackishwater Culture of Tilapia in the Philippines: An Assessment

ANS 18 Test Yourself Sample Test Questions. 1. With respect to relative GLOBAL production tonnage, correctly order the following on the pyramid below:

Entrepreneur s Guide to Mud crab Fattening

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

Unit Two Fisheries Management. Bill Halstead

Collaborative Marine Ornamental Fish Propagation Efforts

SUBJECT: Provision of Fish or Gametes from the Provincial Fish Culture Program

Staff, Organizations Directly Affected (including but not limited to):

Pangasius Catfish Production in Ponds with Soy-Based Feeds

Updated August Aquaculture Curriculum

West Coast Rock Lobster. Description of sector. History of the fishery: Catch history

Family Clupeidae. River Herring of the James

R & E Grant Application 13 Biennium

Production of Longnose Catfish (Leiocassis longirostris) Fingerlings in Beijing Using the ASA 80:20 Pond Model and Soymeal-Based Feeds

4 Ridership Growth Study

2012 Maryland FMP Report (July 2013) Section 15. Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus)

Managing Development and Chesapeake Bay s Estuarine Fish

Mirror Carp Fry to Fingerling Growth Performance in Ponds in Harbin with Soymeal-Based Feeds

Japan s report on Paragraph 13, CMM

AUDIT U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE WILDLIFE AND SPORT FISH RESTORATION PROGRAM GRANTS

ANS 18 Test Yourself Sample Test Questions. 1. With respect to relative GLOBAL production tonnage, correctly order the following on the pyramid below:

From water to land. Why closed containment is the future of international salmon farming

This paper not to be cited without prior. C.M. l983/g:24 Demersal Fish Committee Ref. Mariculture Cttee

Managing Chesapeake Bay s Land Use, Fish Habitat, and Fisheries: Studies. Jim Uphoff & Margaret McGinty, Fisheries Service

Exploring the Aquaculture Industry

ILLINOIS MUSKIE CREEL PROJECT IMA Release Winner Chad Cain with his 49 7/ lb. Kinkaid Lake Muskie

POLYCULTURE OF LARGEMOUTH BASS (Micropterus salmoides) WITH BLUE TILAPIA (Oreochromis aurea): USING TILAPIA PROGENY AS FORAGE

A ONE-HUNDRED-DAY CULTURE TRIAL OF THREE DIFFERENT FAMILIES OF GIFT TILPIA, OREOCHROMIS NILOTICUS

Trout stocking the science

Fee-Fishing. An Introduction. Charles E. Cichra, Michael P. Masser and Ronnie J. Gilbert*

Big Canyon 67 miles upstream. 38 miles upstream

SEAFDEC/AQD Institutional Repository (SAIR)

Council CNL(15)26. Annual Progress Report on Actions Taken Under Implementation Plans for the Calendar Year EU Spain (Navarra)

Pangasius Catfish Production in LVHD Cages with a Soy-Based Feed

CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION

Status of Mussel Culture in NH. Michael Chambers, Rich Langan, Ken La Valley University of New Hampshire

Transcription:

Cocahoe Economics Fact Sheet Undertaking a large project such as baitfish farming requires a good deal of advanced planning to ensure that prudent decisions are made. The purpose of this section is to provide cost estimates for potential producers. These estimates may assist interested parties in deciding which type of production, if any, is right for their individual situation. However, projected costs and returns vary considerably based on available resources and scale. These cost projections are meant to act as a guideline only for interested parties and potential producers to make cost estimates appropriate to their unique situations. Every individual situation will be unique and cannot be duplicated here. In order to gain an accurate economic portrayal, interviews were conducted at four Louisiana bait shops across three parishes. These interviews served to provide information on interactions between wholesalers and retailers. Shop owners and managers were asked questions regarding holding capacity, types of holding systems, sale price, and survivability of cocahoe minnows. They also provided data on wholesale prices, reliability of wholesalers, and turnover on minnow batches. All of the shops interviewed sold cocahoe minnows as live bait. Of the four shops interviewed, three received their minnows from external harvesters. One of the shops interviewed caught their own bait. This shop also provided valuable information on the costs associated with catching minnows. The information collected in these interviews was used to determine our estimated standard price per minnow as well as the volume of minnows that could be sold per average unit of time. For the purpose of our estimates, both the average wholesale price and the average weekly turnover were used. Five owner-operator production examples were developed, and costs associated with each were identified and quantified. An economic model was developed to create the projected costs and returns for each example. Projected costs for production scenarios were the result of a combination of information obtained from past minnow production publications, research and operations taking place at the LSU AgCenter Aquaculture Research Station, and the bait shop interviews. For these examples, it was assumed that the owner-operator was already in possession of the land needed with some type of existing structure for the production system. Prices of materials were based on average market value as of spring 2012. The costs and returns associated with these models are dependent on a number of factors. The type of production system employed and the size or scale of the operation have significant impacts on both the total investment needed and the estimated return as seen in 1 Owner-Operator Production Scenarios: 1) Wild Harvest and Immediate Sale Minnows are trapped in the wild and sold immediately after harvest to bait shops or the public. 2) Wild Harvest and Long Term Holding Minnows are trapped in the wild with the majority of the catch sold immediately after harvest to bait shops or the public. In this scenario extra traps are fished and a portion of the catch is held over to be sold in the off season when fish are not as abundant. 3) Intensive Recirculated System Minnows are produced from eggs solely in tanks or pools in a closed recirculated system where all nutrition is provided via prepared feed. 4) Pond Only Production System Minnows are produced from eggs solely in ponds where nutrition comes primarily from natural productivity and supplemented with prepared feed. 5) Pool Spawning and Pond Growout Production System A hybrid system where minnows are produced from eggs. Broodfish are spawned intensively in pools. Larvae are hatched in outdoor ponds where nutrition comes primarily from natural productivity and supplemented with prepared feed.

Table 1. Wild Harvest and Immediate Sale Start-Up Expenditures-Wild Harvest Total Harvesting Infrastructure 16' Boat, 25hp motor, trailer $9,267 Boat supplies and transport equipment $866 Traps $990 Bait Holding Submersible purging cages $579 Pumps, plumbing, filters & other equip. $8,410 Contingency (10%) $2,200 Total Start-up costs $24,197 Bait, fuel, fishing lease $8,664 Holding costs $382 Labor $3,600 Contingency (10%) $905 Total $12,646 Principle and interest $2,308 Depreciation (10%) $2,419 Total $4,728 Total Annual Costs $17,347 Total Annual Revenue $44,297 Net Revenue to Owner $26,923 *This scenario will produce 295,313 fish per year Table 2. Wild Harvest and Long Term Holding Start-Up Expenditures-Harvest and Holding Total Harvesting Infrastructure 16' Boat, 25hp motor, trailer $9,267 Boat supplies and transport equipment $866 Traps $1,320 Bait Holding 800 gallon poly holding tanks $1,886 Submersible purging cages $579 Pumps, plumbing filters & other equip. $11,886 Contingency (10%) $2,769 Total Start-up costs $30,458 Bait, fuel, fishing lease $11,379 Holding costs $435 Labor $3,600 Contingency (10%) $1,181 Total $15,413 Principle and interest $2,906 Depreciation (10%) $3,045 Total $5,951 Total Annual Costs $21,365 Total Annual Revenue $59,063 Net Revenue to Owner $37,697 *This scenario will produce 393,750 fish per year our examples. The location of the operation may also influence costs. These numbers are based on hypothetical examples, and actual costs and returns will vary based on individual situations. All scenarios are assuming a price of $0.15 per minnow and startup costs financed over five years. Wild Caught Harvest and Immediate Sale The first example is for a wild caught harvester scenario with short-term holding (Table 1). This scenario is the current practice in the cocahoe minnow bait industry. In this scenario it is assumed that the owner-operator is fishing 30 traps on a 1000-acre lease for 150 days out of the year and catching an average of 75 minnows per trap. It is assumed there is some paid part-time help, and 100 percent of the surviving catch is sold. The projected number of minnows produced for sale per year in this scenario is 295,300 fish. This is enough cocahoes to support an estimated one or two shops if the supply is consistent year round. The number of minnows that would need to be sold to break even in this scenario is 115,827 fish per year (Table 1). Wild Caught Harvest and Long Term Holding The next example expands on the first wild caught scenario with the addition of long-term holding (Table 2). This scenario is not as common but may be beneficial in supplying minnows when they are difficult to catch. In this scenario it is assumed that the owner-operator is fishing 40 traps on a 1000-acre lease for 150 days out of the year and catching an average of 75 minnows per trap. The number of traps fished in this scenario was increased to account for the additional minnows that would need to be held long-term to make this scenario feasible. This scenario also assumes there is some paid part-time help, and 100 percent of the surviving catch is sold. The projected number of minnows produced for sale per year in this scenario is 393,700 fish. This is enough to support 2

Table 3. Intensive Recirculated System Start-Up Expenditures-Intensive Recirculated Total Fiberglass tanks $13,735 Growout tanks $90,437 Salinity and DO meter $1,270 Pumps, plumbing, filters & other equip. $28,654 Fish hauling tank $1,422 Salt $4,919 Contingency (10%) $15,683 Total Start-up costs $158,002 an estimated one to three shops year round. The number of minnows that would need to be sold to break even in this scenario is 142,436 fish per year (Table 2). Closed Recirculated System The costs and returns associated with minnow production in a closed recirculated system are outlined in Table 3. In this scenario the broodstock are spawned outdoors in six 2,641-gallon fiberglass pools in April and May and again in September through mid-october. They are stocked at a density of approximately 250 fish per tank with a 2:1 female to male ratio. Each female is assumed to produce approximately seven eggs per day. Spawning supplies $377 Of the total eggs produced, 75 percent are estimated to Feed $53,957 be viable. In this scenario the fish were air incubated and Electricity $7,561 Labor $36,000 separated into two-week batches. They are then grown Contingency (10%) $6,189 out in 500-gallon polyethylene tanks at a density of 19 Total $97,895 fish per gallon at the fry and larvae stage and 11 fish per gallon at the juvenile stage. They will reach market size, approximately 0.18 oz. in eight months. Thus in the first Principle and interest $15,075 Depreciation (10%) $15,800 year the returns will be lower as only one round of eggs Total $30,875 will be ready for market that year. In this scenario, one full time employee will be required in addition to the Total Annual Costs $128,770 owner operator due to the intensive nature of the system. Total Annual Revenue $40,230 It is also assumed that 100 percent of the surviving fish Net Revenue to Owner -$88,540 will be sold. The projected number of fish produced the *This scenario will produce 268,202 fish per year first startup year is 155,500 individuals. After the initial year the number of minnows produced is estimated to be 268,200 fish. This is enough to supply one to two bait shops year round; however, it would take about 858,467 fish per year sold at $0.15 to break even in this system. Pond Only The pond spawning and grow out scenario is outlined in Table 4. For this scenario, cost and yields were projected for the same operation at two different scales: 10-acre and 2-acre. In both cases the use of the three-phase pond system was assumed. Brood ponds were stocked at 10,000 fish per acre with a 2:1 female to male ratio. Eggs were separated into two-week batches with an assumed 65 percent viability. Fry ponds were stocked at a density of 1,000,000 per acre and grow out ponds were stocked at a density of 100,000 fish per acre. It was assumed that the ponds were fertilized weekly and supplemented with feed. Of the viable eggs, it was assumed that only 60 percent would survive to market size, 39 percent survivability from the total eggs harvested. Market size would be attained in about six months, and 100 percent of fish reaching market size would be sold. For the 10-acre scenario, it was assumed that one full time employee and one part time employee would be required in addition to the owneroperator. For the 2-acre scenario, it was assumed that only one fulltime employee was needed in addition to the owner-operator. The 10-acre scenario accounts for three 0.25 acre brood ponds, four 0.2 acre larval ponds and fourteen 0.55 acre grow out ponds. At this scale approximately 475,000 fish would be produced the first year and 819,000 fish in subsequent years. This is enough to supply at least six to seven bait shops year round. To break even at this scale a minimum of 731,047 fish would need to be produced and sold, approximately 35 percent survivability of the total eggs produced. The smaller scale 2-acre operation entails one 0.15 acre brood pond, four 0.04 acre larval ponds and seven 0.2 acre grow out ponds. At this scale approximately 95,000 fish will be produced the first year and 163,800 fish in the 3

Table 4. Pond Only Production System Start-Up Expenditures-Ponds Total: 10 Acre Total: 2 Acre Pond construction $46,159 $9,656 Salinity and DO meter $1,270 $1,270 Paddlewheel aerator $4,036 $847 Aerator $3,683 $1,841 Fish hauling tank $1,422 $1,422 $1,886 Harvesting & testing supplies $1,767 $1,546 Contingency (10%) $6,022 $1,847 Total Start-up costs $66,245 $20,317 Spawning Supplies $987 $67 Feed $50,175 $10,035 Fertilizer $6,316 $1,283 Electricity $2,274 $764 Labor $27,000 $18,000 Gas for distribution $1,284 $1,284 Contingency (10%) $8,675 $3,015 Total $96,712 $34,450 Principle and interest $6,321 $1,938 Depreciation (10%) $6,624 $2,032 Total $12,945 $3,970 Table 5. Pool Spawning and Pond Growout Production System Start-Up Expenditures-Pool & Pond Total 10 Acre Total 2 Acre Fiberglass tanks $68,673 $13,735 Pond construction $47,752 $9,550 Salinity and DO meter $1,270 $1,270 Paddlewheel aerator $8,579 $1,716 Aerator $3,683 $3,683 Blower and air lines $2,289 $458 Fish hauling tank $1,422 $1,422 $1,886 Salt $4,707 $941 Harvesting & testing supplies $2,083 $1,583 Contingency (10%) $14,234 $3,624 Total Start-up costs $156,575 $39,867 Spawning supplies $1,884 $377 Fertilizer $6,079 $1,283 Feed $50,612 $10,122 Electricity $4,710 $1,733 Labor $27,000 $18,000 Supplemental salt $470 $470 Gas for distribution $1,285 $1,285 Contingency (10%) $9,204 $3,807 Total $90,285 $36,598 Total Annual Costs $109,657 $38,420 Total Annual Revenue $122,850 $24,570 Net Revenue to Owner $13,193 -$13,850 *These scenarios will produce 819,000 and 163,800 fish per year respectively. years after that. This is enough to supply one to two bait shops; however to breakeven at this scale, 256,134 fish would need to be produced and sold, 61 percent of the eggs produced. Principle and Interest $14,939 $3,804 Depreciation (10%) $15,658 $3,986 Total $30,597 $7,790 Total Annual Costs $120,882 $44,389 Total Annual Revenue $186,543 $46,636 Net Revenue to Owner $65,661 $2,247 *These scenarios will produce 1,554,525 and 310,905 fish per year respectively. Pool Spawning and Pond Grow Out The final scenario, in Table 5, is a hybrid system incorporating pool spawning with pond grow out. The costs and yields for this scenario were also projected on a larger 10-acre and smaller 2-acre scale. For both size operations, the fish were spawned in 2,641-gallon fiberglass pools at a density of 250 fish per pool at a 2:1 female to male ratio. Eggs were again separated into two-week batches. They would then be hatched in the larval ponds and transferred to grow out ponds after 3-4 weeks. They are stocked at the same densities by life stage as the ponds only scenario and fertilized and fed in the same manner. It is assumed that this scenario will yield a higher percentage of viable eggs (75 percent) because they are produced in a more controlled environment. However the pond survivability is assumed the same, yielding an overall survivability of 45 percent of the total eggs produced. Market size is reached in about six months. For the large-scale scenario it was assumed that one full time employee and one part-time employee would be needed in addition to the owner-operator. The large-scale scenario assumes 30 fiberglass pools for spawning, four 0.35 acre larval ponds and 14, 0.6 acre, grow out ponds. This would produce 901,600 fish the first year and 1,554,500 in subsequent years. At this level of production at least 12-15 bait shops would need to be supplied to sell 100 percent of the fish produced. As a more conservative estimate, the figures in Table 5 adopt 4

an 80 percent sale of fish produced, which would still supply 8-12 bait shops. In order to break even at this scale 805,880 fish would need to be sold. In the smaller scale 2-acre operation it was assumed that one fulltime employee would be needed in addition to the owner operator (Table 5). This scenario at this scale utilizes six fiberglass pools, four 0.07 acre larval ponds, and eight 0.2 acre grow out ponds. At this scale, this scenario would produce 180,300 fish the first year and 310,900 in years after. At 100 percent sale of fish produced this would supply two to three bait shops year round. To break even at this scale 287,428 fish would need to be sold. Conclusion When choosing the scenario that best suits your needs scale is a very important factor. The wild harvest scenario, while it turns a modest profit, requires the sale of the least minnows to break even. Conversely, the large scale 10 acre pool spawning and pond grow out scenario, which yielded the highest profit, requires an extremely high percentage of the minnows produced to be sold in order to break even. If this scenario were to be implemented it would be best to establish a guaranteed market with a set sale price prior to implementation. This would ensure enough of the product could be sold at a sustainable price for the owner operator to maintain a profit. The smaller scale 2 acre pool spawning and pond grow out may also be an avenue to be explored along with wild harvest and long term holding as they both require relatively low volume of minnow sale to break even. Also in both cases, an adequate profit can be earned if the system is utilized to its maximum production potential. While the large-scale pond only scenario does produce a positive profit, the volume of minnows that would need to be sold to break even is high, and again, it would be wise to establish guaranteed buyers with a set sale price before this scenario was implemented. In addition scale is very important. While there was a small profit at the full 10 acre scale, 2-acre pond only scenario resulted in a loss. The recirculated system scenario produced the largest net loss to owner. In order to break even this system would require a threefold increase in market price as it is not able to produce the volume of minnows required to break even. This system is strongly unadvisable for anyone looking to enter cocahoe minnow production unless proper infrastructure is already in place. All of the numbers and figures in this section were generated through generic conceptual economic models with no less than 39 specific assumptions that affect the costs and yields of these scenarios. Anyone seriously interested in investing in cocahoe minnow production is strongly encouraged to contact Dr. Julie Anderson at JAnderson@ Agcenter.lsu.edu or (225) 578-7718 or Dr. Christopher Green at CGreen@Agcenter.lsu.edu or (225) 765-2848 for a situational economic analysis. Contributors: Jill Christoferson Rex Caffey Julie Anderson Chris Green Revised June 2012 5