VDOT BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT April 2017

Similar documents
BIKE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT. November 2006

State Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Meeting Spring Meeting. April 22nd, 2015 John Bolecek Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Planner

Fiscal Year 2017 Bicycle and Pedestrian Metric Report

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014

State Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Meeting. March 27, 2013 John Bolecek Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Planner

Complete Streets for Louisiana

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council

Linking Transportation and Health in Nashville & Middle Tennessee

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

PennDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Initiatives. Jonathan Heilman Roy Gothie Angela Watson

Virginia Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. Fall Meeting Minutes. October 26, Meeting start: 10:00 am. Meeting end: 2:00 pm

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Development of Guidelines for Bicycle Use of Controlled Access Facilities in Virginia

Rio Mills Rd/Berkmar Dr Extended Connection

Implementation of Active Design: Opportunities in Transportation Policies & Plans May 2011

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Bicycle and Pedestrian

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

Complete Streets implementation in Chicagoland

Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator

APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

Evolving Roadway Design Policies for Walking and Bicycling

ARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY

Complete Streets: Policy to Pavement

CSS and Complete Streets Partnering with Mn/DOT for Complete Streets. Scott Bradley Director of CSS April 27, 2010 CTS Research Conference

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

Bikeway Plan for the Roanoke Valley Area MPO Update ACKWOWLEDGEMENTS

Developing a Regional Complete Streets Policy Statement for North Central Texas. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee August 17, 2011

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Multi-Modal Transportation Programs

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

Living Streets Policy

LOUISIANA COMPLETE STREETS POLICY. Ellen W. Soll, AICP Principal Soll Planning

Scope of Services BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MPO

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Bicyclist Signing Guidelines

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

Transportation Assessment

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

PROJECT BACKGROUND/DESCRIPTION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2013

Chapter 7: Six-Step Implementation Process

A. LETTERS OF SUPPORT ON THE WYTHE CREEK ROAD WIDENING PROJECT

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

DRAFT MOVING FORWARD RHODE ISLAND BICYCLE MOBILITY PLAN 2018 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY IN ASSOCIATION WITH

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete.

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

City of Ottawa s Complete Streets Approach to Transportation Projects

Bike/Multipurpose Trail Study for Glynn County, Georgia MAY 16, 2016

Zlatko Krstulich, P.Eng. City of O9awa

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Funding Sources Appendix I. Appendix I. Funding Sources. Virginia Beach Bikeways and Trails Plan 2011 Page I-1

USDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Initiative: Safer People and Safer Streets. Barbara McCann, USDOT Office of Policy

Planning and Programming Committee Meeting April 14,

Land Use Patterns. Traditional Modern

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Public Transportation and Bicycle & Pedestrian Stakeholder Webinar. April 11, :30 PM

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Bicycling & Walking in the Twin Cities TPP Bike/Ped Chapter Overview. Land Use Advisory Committee September 21, 2017

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Access Management Regulations and Standards for Minor Arterials, Collectors, Local Streets

Highway Safety Improvement

Facilitating Suburban Bike-to-Rail

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual

WELCOME! To the Centennial Neighbourhoods Secondary Plan and Transportation Management Plan Information Centre. City of Hamilton

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

Creating Complete Streets to Accommodate All Users

Arterial Management Plan for US Route 250 and State Route 623

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION CHAPTER 8

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan: Chapters 3 and 4 Distribution

Transcription:

VDOT BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT April 2017 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page(s) About this Guide 3 Encouraging development of bicycle and pedestrian plans by localities 3-6 Involving localities in pre-scoping & scoping VDOT administered 7 Documenting locality involvement and positions through the public hearing process 8 Steps for conflict resolution between VDOT and localities 8-9 Implementation of Bike and Pedestrian Policy with Locally Initiated or Locally Administered Projects 9-10 2

About this Guide On March 18 th, 2004 the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) passed the Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations which addresses bicycling and walking as fundamental travel modes, and integrates the consideration of bicycle and pedestrian accommodations into VDOT procedures and projects agency-wide. VDOT has developed a number of governance and guidance documents to aid in the implementation of this policy. This guide outlines the different responsibilities of VDOT and local governments and how requirements differ for VDOT administered and locally administered projects. Encouraging Development of Bike and Pedestrian Plans by Localities Transportation planning in Virginia is largely a bottom-up process, with decisions regarding project selection, economic development and land use residing with localities. While largely the responsibility for maintenance, statewide transportation planning and project management mostly resides with the state. Increasingly, more projects are Locally Administered. Localities develop local comprehensive plans, which include a transportation component that focuses on the specific issues and needs of the locality. These local plans may or may not include a specific bicycle and pedestrian component. Many localities have standalone bicycle and/or pedestrian plans. Regional plans, such as Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Long-Range Transportation Plans, Small Urban Area Plans, and Rural Long-Range Transportation Plans take a larger geographic perspective with respect to transportation and address, to varying degrees, bicycle and pedestrian needs. As described in the following table, these local and regional plans should serve as a resource for VDOT project managers in determining where and what type of bicycle and pedestrian accommodations are desired by localities. In the absence of a local or regional bicycle and pedestrian plan, the Project Manager should confirm whether the project falls on U.S. Numbered Bicycle Routes 1 and 76. While bicycle and pedestrian accommodations are not required to be in a local, regional, or state plan for inclusion in a highway project, documenting the need for accommodations and existence of a bicycle or pedestrian network in the context of an adopted planning document demonstrates the locality s commitment, serves as a guide for future improvements, and provides a basis for investment decisions. On the following pages, more detailed discussion of these plans and expected steps are provided to guide project development activities of VDOT project managers. It is the responsibility of the District Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator and/or District Planner, in coordination TMPD staff, to encourage development and use of bicycle and pedestrian elements of transportation plans. 3

It is the responsibility of the District Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator and/or District Planner to bring information regarding the content of applicable bike/ped plans to the scoping meeting. It is the responsibility of the assigned project manager that appropriate bike and pedestrian features are considered and included in all projects as detailed in the CTB policy. 4

Encourage development and use of bicycle & pedestrian plans by localities Local Plans - The Code of Virginia requires localities to prepare comprehensive plans to guide development. These plans must include a transportation element, and as of July 1, 2007, a transportation plan, that may address bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. Many localities also have a local, standalone bicycle and/or pedestrian plans. - Beginning in July 2007, the VA Code (see 15.2-2222.1) requires VDOT to review and provide comments on new or amended local comprehensive plans and traffic impact statements for activities that will substantially affect transportation on state-controlled highways. Local governments are the resource for obtaining individual plans. - Local plans should be the primary resource for determining where and what type of bicycle and pedestrian accommodations are desired by localities. Team Member Responsible TMPD, Residency Administrators Regional Plans Rural Long-Range Transportation Plans - Through the Rural Transportation Planning Program, TMPD encourages PDCs and localities to develop rural long-range transportation plans. - These plans will be developed in three phases and include an inventory of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and recommended improvements. TMPD provides technical support for this initiative, with VDOT district staff responsible for coordinating with the PDC on the plan s development. TMPD will maintain a library of the Rural Long-Range Transportation Plans. - In the absence of a local plan that provides specific information regarding bicycle and pedestrian needs, the bicycle and pedestrian element of the applicable Rural Long-Range Transportation Plan should be used to determine appropriate bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. Small Urban Area Plans - Planners update the Small Urban Area Plans for "small urban areas" (towns and cities with populations less than 50,000 people) across the Commonwealth. These plans TMPD, District Planners, Residency Administrators TMPD, District Planners 5

Encourage development and use of bicycle & pedestrian plans by localities address transportation issues in each community. - While the primary focus of these plans is on the highway system, bicycle and pedestrian facilities and needs will be identified. TMPD maintains a library of the Small Urban Area Plans. - In the absence of a local plan that provides specific information regarding bicycle and pedestrian needs, the bicycle and pedestrian element of the applicable Small Urban Area Plan should be used to determine appropriate bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. MPO Long-Range Plans - TMPD administers the federal funding for the state s metropolitan planning organizations to conduct the federally required continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process. - The transportation plans developed through this process must include a bicycle and pedestrian element. TMPD maintains a copy of the current long-range plan for each MPO and VDOT District Planners participate in the development of these plans. - In the absence of a local comprehensive plan that provides specific information regarding bicycle and pedestrian needs, the bicycle and pedestrian element of the applicable MPO s Long-Range Plan should be used to determine appropriate bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. U.S. Bicycle Routes - In the absence of a local or regional bicycle plan, the Project Manager should check whether the project falls on a US Numbered Bicycle Routes. Virginia s Route are mapped below: Team Member Responsible TMPD, District Planners TMPD, District Planners TMPD http://www.virginiadot.org/programs/united_states_bicycle_ro ute_1_and_76_in_virginia.asp 6

Involving Localities in Pre-scoping and Scoping for VDOT Administered Projects A critical decision point in the development of any project is the scoping. It establishes the vision and goals of the project, as well as the budget and schedule for achieving them. As each and every project is built in a locality of the Commonwealth, often with funds raised and/or prioritized by local officials, local government involvement in the scoping process is essential. As the Department moves forward on the CTB s policy for bike and pedestrian features, it is necessary that localities are involved in the decision making process for where and how these features will be included on highway projects. To that end, the following table outlines the procedural steps to be taken to ensure locality involvement in establishing the bike and pedestrian features on a project. Specify how localities are to be included in scoping of projects - At least 14 days prior to the scoping meeting, a formal letter will be sent to affected local governments, inviting them to participate in pre-scoping and scoping meetings. This letter should be sent to the county administrator, town manager, or other executive leader. - Within 14 days following a scoping meeting, local government shall submit a written letter of agreement or disagreement with the scope of the project as established at the scoping meeting. Further, this response must explicitly agree or disagree with the bike and pedestrian features being planned for the project. If no letter is received, it will be assumed that the locality concurs with the scope of the project as established at the scoping meeting. - The scoping form will be elevated to the District Administrator for resolution in the event that a locality has formally expressed disagreement with bicycle and pedestrian design features as proposed. Team Member Responsible VDOT Project Manager Local Government VDOT Project Manager - The District Administrator will meet with the locality and subsequently provide a written response explaining the final direction for the project. - Appeals of decisions made by the District Administrator will be made to the Chief Engineer. The Chief Engineer s decision will be final. 7

In the case of SMART SCALE projects, decisions regarding the bicycle and pedestrian project elements are made prior to the grant submission. Those projects that are funded go through the project development process and will have an official scoping later. These projects must still comply with the 2004 CTB Policy and document the bicycle and pedestrian accommodation decisions on the Scoping Worksheet Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation (SWBPA). It is important that bicycle and pedestrian features are considered before the application is submitted as cost increases due to additions required for compliance with the 2004 CTB Policy could cause an application to be rescored. See the SMART SCALE Policy, Technical, and Application Guides on the SMART SCALE Resources website for more information. Documenting Locality Involvement and Positions through the Public Hearing Process Involving the locality in project scoping should build consensus on the vision for the project and minimize objection to the design features. The District Administrator notifies the locality via letter of the Public Hearing results and design approval with or without accommodations. Further, this response must explicitly detail the planned bike & pedestrian features and costs. Requirements for the public hearing process are specifically identified in VDOT s Public Involvement Manual at the following web site: http://www.virginiadot.org/business/resources/locdes/public_involvement_manual.pdf Steps for Conflict Resolution between VDOT and Localities As the locality will be integrally involved in establishing the vision of the project through the scoping process, it is not anticipated that there will be frequent objection to the design features following public hearing. There are matters that surface during the public involvement process that can raise questions and concerns from a locality. As discussed in the preceding section of this guide, the District Administrator (or designee) will be responsible for providing a letter to affected localities explaining the outcome of the public hearing. That letter will be explicit about the planned bike and pedestrian features and estimated costs. If a locality s standards differ from AASHTO and VDOT standards, the design exception process must be followed. Upon such occasion that a locality disagrees with the decisions made by a District Administrator, the procedures identified in the following table will be followed to provide resolution. 8

Specifying steps for appeals/conflict resolution when localities disagree with VDOT bike & pedestrian strategies on a project - Within 14 days of receipt of documentation from a public hearing, local government shall submit a written letter of disagreement with the design features established following the public hearing process. Further, this response must explicitly disagree with the bike and pedestrian features being planned for the project and provide an explanation for the disagreement. Team Member Responsible Local Government This letter will be sent directly to the District Administrator. - The District Administrator will meet with the locality and subsequently provide a written response explaining the final direction for the project. - Appeals of decisions made by the District Administrator will be made to the Chief Engineer. The Chief Engineer s decision will be final. District Administrator Chief Engineer Implementation of Bike & Pedestrian Policy with Locally Initiated or Locally Administered projects: Virginia s transportation program delivery continues to evolve to include increasing roles and responsibilities by local governments. Much of this change has been initiated through changes in Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) business philosophy, the Virginia General Assembly s direction through legislation, and an increase in local funding to meet transportation needs. As a result, VDOT is expanding beyond its traditional role as an implementing agency with an increased role in oversight and stewardship of the transportation program. In addition to localities managing their own construction projects and programs, many localities are initiating road projects beyond those included in VDOT s Six Year Improvement Program (SYIP). These projects range from constructing a turn lane to constructing a multilane facility that is part of the locality s Capital Improvement Program. Until March of 2004, VDOT s policies often discouraged localities from including sidewalks and bicycle lanes in their construction projects. Urban and suburban localities have often requested these facilities and it is expected that they will include various types of bicycle/pedestrian facilities in locally initiated and locally administered projects. When a locality chooses to initiate or administer a transportation project and the project uses funds that pass through VDOT or is on VDOT right of way, localities must adhere to the 2004 Commonwealth Transportation Board Policy for Integrating Bicycle and 9

Pedestrian Accommodations and DPM 2-12. In accordance with this policy, the locality will determine how and where bicycle and pedestrian accommodations will be included in each project. Locally administered projects are not required to follow VDOT processes and therefore, may utilize their own scoping documents to meet this requirement; however, the locality must document in the project file what accommodations are made. If no accommodation is made, the locality must document which exception from the CTB policy was met. Localities are encouraged to work with their VDOT District Project Coordinator to ensure projects are appropriately documented. Additional information can be found in Chapter 12 of the Local Administered Projects (LAP) Manual and on the Bicycling and Walking in Virginia s website. 10