Alberta Conservation Association 2017/18 Project Summary Report

Similar documents
Alberta Conservation Association 2018/19 Project Summary Report. Project Name: Upland Gamebird Studies Upland Gamebird Productivity Surveys

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report

Improving Big Game Migration Corridors in Southwest Wyoming

Acquisition & Protection

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report. Primary ACA staff on project: Stefanie Fenson, Jeff Forsyth and Jon Van Dijk

Alberta Conservation Association 2017/18 Project Summary Report

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report

Alberta Conservation Association 2015/16 Project Summary Report

Street Edmonton, AB T6K 1T8. Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA) Position On Game Farming In Alberta February 2004

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report

CAMERA SURVEYS: HELPING MANAGERS AVOID THE PITFALLS

ALBERTA HEN HOUSE SUPER SITE PROJECT. GRANT #1.2.1aa-09/10

Project Period 1/15/ /31/2017 Project Location Description (from Proposal) Project Summary (from Proposal) Summary of Accomplishments

Deer Management Unit 252

Evaluating Responses by Pronghorn to Fence Modifications Across the Northern Great Plains

Big Cypress National Preserve. Hunting Management Plan /

Mule deer in the Boundary Region: Proposed research and discussion

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report

Alberta Conservation Association (ACA) Date: Project Name: Taber Pheasant Festival. Wildlife Program Manager: Doug Manzer

2016 West Coast Entanglement Summary

THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT ACT. (No. 47 of 2013)

Carpenter Real Estate Presents:

Southwest Alberta Wolves: Prey, Movements, and Habitat

Project Name: Distribution and Abundance of the Migratory Bull Trout Population in the Castle River Drainage (Year 4 of 4)

Frequently Asked Questions Reintroduction of Bison to Banff National Park

Alberta Conservation Association 2007/08 Project Summary Report

ESRM 350 Habitat Loss and Fragmentation

ROCKWALL CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT

Alberta Conservation Association 2011/12 Project Summary Report. Velma Hudson, Julie Landry-DeBoer, Jim Potter, Amanda Rezansoff and Ken Wright

Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations

Endangered Species on Ranches. Nebraska Grazing Conference August 14 15, 2012

White-tailed Deer Management in Urban/Suburban Environments: Planning for Success

Gray Wolf Prey Base Ecology in the North Fork Flathead River Drainage

Alberta Conservation Association 2009/10 Project Summary Report. Project Name: North Saskatchewan and Ram Rivers Bull Trout Spawning Stock Assessment

Monitoring Asian Elephants and Mitigating Human-Elephant Conflict in the Core Landscape of the Southern/Eastern Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia

At #12, which is the Locke-Levenstein boundary, we thought a minor adjustment in the stays would allow easier

FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT in California s Watersheds. Assessments & Recommendations by the Fish Passage Forum

Ranchers create ponds, wetlands in Owyhee County in partnership with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

Identifying Mule Deer Migration Routes Along the Pinedale Front

Antelope Creek Ranch. Figure 1 photo by Neal Wilson. By Neal Wilson Co-Ranch Manager

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

Questions and Answers: Proposed Rule to List Lesser Prairie-Chicken As Threatened

Strategies for mitigating ecological effects of hatchery programs

Fisheries Protection Program: An overview DFO Pacific Region

MISTLETOE LAKE RANCH AIRPORT ROAD ALEDO, TX ±679 ACRES Eastern Weatherford ETJ Parker County

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

FIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF EAST REGION WILDLIFE RESEARCH PROGRAM

B. PURPOSE: to achieve the following on large, contiguous blocks of private land:

CROP PROTECTION AND WILDLIFE CONTROL FENCES. Non-Electric and Electric Fence Designs

HOLT MOUNTAIN RANCH GLENWOOD, NEW MEXICO 74.4 (15.7 IRRIGATED) DEEDED ACRES 15,722 USFS ACRES

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. February 2, 2016

Comment Letter 1 for Item 5

WILDLIFE HERITAGE TRUST ACCOUNT PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM

Best Management Practices. for Trapping Badger in the United States

Splitting seasons into multiple, shorter ones is preferable to long, crowded seasons.

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Public Access and Recreational Use Policy Making for Chandler Slough Management Area

Hunter use of public-access lands in the Rainwater Basin and beyond

Alberta Conservation Association 2015/16 Project Summary Report

CHEETAH PROJECT Cheetah Conservation Fund. Interviewers name Date


Identifying mule deer migration routes to and from the Pinedale Anticline Project Area

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

Nevada Department of Wildlife Predator Management Plan Fiscal Year 2018

Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act

H. R To provide for the protection of the last remaining herd of wild and genetically pure American buffalo. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

EVALUATION OF HIGH TENSILE ELECTRIC FENCE DESIGNS ON BIG GAME MOVEMENTS AND LIVESTOCK CONTAINMENT

COOKE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION

Opportunities for Promoting Hunting, Angling and Conservation in Strathcona County Dr. Todd Zimmerling, M.Sc., PhD., P.Biol.

Bison Conservation in Canada

WADE WEST INCENTIVE TAGS 2016 NDOW- REPORTING BIOLOGIST SCOTT ROBERTS

Other Relevant International Standards OIE Global Conference on Rabies Control 7-9 September 2011, Incheon, Korea

Questionnaire for Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Interviews on Boreal Caribou LONG VERSION

Alberta Conservation Association 2017/18 Project Summary Report

A Risk-based Audit of the Captive/Privatelyowned Cervid Industry in Michigan

[FWS R6 ES 2017 N031; FF06E FXES111606C0000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Enhancement of Survival Permit

Chronic Wasting Disease in Southeast Minnesota. Drs. Michelle Carstensen and Lou Cornicelli Preston Public Meeting December 18, 2018

The Value of Springs to The Petersen Ranch

GRAHAM PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN

EXHIBIT C. Chronic Wasting Disease

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

Deer-Elk Ecology Research Project

Alberta Conservation Association 2018/19 Project Summary Report. Project Name: North Saskatchewan River Drainage Fish Sustainability Index Data Gaps

Reintroduction Plan: Plains Bison in Banff National Park. March 2015

What if we are wrong about the lionfish invasion? Craig Layman North Carolina State University

Management of Canada Geese

Unit 5: Prioritize and Manage Hazards and Risks STUDENT GUIDE

PARADISE CANYON RANCH

ALBERTA FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING PASSED RESOLUTIONS FEBRUARY 21, 2015

Deer Management Unit 152

Wildlife in the Urban Interface. Jeff Schalau Agent, Agriculture & Natural Resources University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yavapai County

SP-472 AUGUST Feral Hog Population Growth, Density and Harvest in Texas

AOGA EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR. Endangered Species Act

ACTIVITY FIVE SPECIES AT RISK LEARNING OBJECTIVES: MATERIALS: Subjects: Science, math, art, history

Stakeholder Activity

Hunting, Fishing, Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife Conservation Opportunities and Coordination with States, Tribes, and Territories

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Act of 1973

COMMUNITY BASED WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AREAS. Creating and Marketing Your Somewhere By Munira Bashir

Transcription:

Alberta Conservation Association 2017/18 Project Summary Report Project Name: Pronghorn Fence Crossing Enhancement Wildlife Program Manager: Doug Manzer Project Leader: Mike Verhage Primary ACA staff on project: Jennifer Baker, Aiden Bateman, Jeff Forsyth, Paul Jones, Allie Olson, and Mike Verhage Partnerships Alberta Environment and Parks Alberta Fish & Game Association National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Key Findings In 2017/18, Alberta Conservation Association (ACA) completed two projects in partnership with Alberta Fish & Game Association (AFGA) where we modified 26 kilometre of barbedwire fence by replacing the bottom strand with double-stranded smooth wire and adjusted its height to 46 centimetre off the ground. In addition to enhancing fences to make them wildlife-friendly, we also removed one kilometre of page wire; a type of fence that poses a significant barrier to pronghorn movement. Due to the extreme dry conditions and associated fire hazard in 2017/18, we completed fewer projects and had less personnel than previous years. Introduction Having evolved on the prairies of North America, pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) have not developed an instinct to jump vertical obstacles. The proliferation of fencing that followed cattle ranching into Alberta poses a serious barrier to pronghorn movement (Gates et al. 2012). Pronghorn may cross under fence lines in some locations, but it slows down their movement making them susceptible to predators and in some cases strips hair off their back causing lacerations and making them vulnerable to infection and frostbite (Jones 2014). Pronghorn also may become entangled in fences and perhaps become trapped and die (Gates et al. 2012). A solution is to replace the bottom wire with double-stranded smooth wire and move it up to 46 centimetres; however, this is expensive and takes a lot of effort. To help alleviate this problem, Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA) initiated a project in 2009, which Alberta Conservation Association (ACA) has provided assistance with. The project works with private landowners in southeastern Alberta to actively 1

convert existing barbed-wire fences to wildlife-friendly fences. The primary objective for this project is to increase permeability within the pronghorn migration corridor in southern Alberta and reduce associated stress to wildlife, physical injury, and even death that can be caused by high densities of current barbed-wire fences. This ongoing effort benefits pronghorn and other wildlife by reducing barriers to seasonal migration and enabling wildlife to move throughout the landscape easier, without the associated stress and physical harm that animals endure when forced to cross underneath barbed-wire fences. Methods In the spring of 2017, we met with interested landowners and AFGA to discuss modifying fences to make them pronghorn- and wildlife-friendly. We identified candidate fence lines on maps to be modified for each participating landowner; this information was used to help plan fence modification weekends and coordinate volunteers. In the field, we replaced the bottom strand of barbed-wire with double-stranded smooth wire and adjusted the height of the bottom wire to 46 centimetres. We also respaced the remaining strands of barbed-wire to ensure the fence remains functional for livestock. This alteration enables wildlife such as pronghorn and deer (Odocoileus sp.) to easily cross fences underneath the bottom smooth wire. Results We completed two fencing projects with AFGA in 2017/18, where we modified 26 kilometres of barbed-wire fence by replacing the bottom strand with double-stranded smooth wire and adjusting its height to 46 centimetres. The number of projects completed was fewer than previous years due to the extreme fire hazard that prevailed throughout southern Alberta for much of the summer. With this hazard in mind, we purposefully chose projects that were smaller in scope and that required fewer staff members and volunteers. AFGA completed an additional two projects without the on-the-ground assistance from ACA that included modifying 16 kilometres of fence. In total, 42 kilometres of wildlife-friendly fencing was completed (Figure 1). 2

Figure 1. Kilometres of wildlife-friendly fence completed per year by Alberta Fish & Game Association and Alberta Conservation Association. Conclusions Replacing the bottom strand with smooth wire at 46 centimetres is a practical solution to reducing physical harm done to pronghorn and other wildlife and it also eliminates barriers to movement on a fine-scale, project-by-project basis. The primary challenge associated with this solution is that there is currently an extremely high density of existing barbed-wire fences within the grasslands natural region and the pronghorn migration corridor in southeastern Alberta (Seward et al. 2014). Prioritizing focal areas within the migration corridor based on previous animal collar data is one method of identifying priority areas to work within; however, this would also require the cooperation of private landowners living in these areas. The cumulative effort of completed projects have the potential for landscape connectivity for pronghorn. Other considerations include the cost, time, effort, and materials required to complete fence modifications. Certainly, these projects would not be possible without the leadership and coordination from AFGA, dedicated volunteers, and participating private landowners. Key Contacts T.J. Schwanky Alberta Fish & Game Association Martin Sharren Alberta Fish & Game Association 3

Literature Cited Gates, C.C., P. Jones, M. Suitor, A. Jakes, M.S. Boyce, K. Kunkel, and K. Wilson. 2012. The influence of land use and fences on habitat effectiveness, movements and distribution of pronghorn in the grasslands of North America. Pages 277 294. In: M.J. Somers and M. Hayward, editors. Fencing for conservation: restrictions of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processed? Springer-US, New York, New York USA. Jones, P.F. 2014. Scarred for life; the other side of the fence debate. Human-Wildlife Interactions 8: 150 154. Seward, B., P. F. Jones, and A. T. Hurley. 2014. Where are all the fences: mapping fences from satellite imagery. Proceeding of the Pronghorn Workshop 25:92-98. 4

Photos Alberta Conservation Association staff member Jennifer Baker and a volunteer secure the bottom smooth wire at 46 centimetres above ground with a power stapler. Photo: Mike Verhage 5

An image of a barbed-wire fence where the bottom strand has been replaced with doublestranded smooth wire and its height adjusted to 46 centimetres. Photo: Robert Anderson 6

An image from a trail camera shows severe scarring on the neck and back of a pronghorn female resulting from repetitive crossings under barbed-wire fences. Photo: Alberta Conservation Association Alberta Conservation Association staff member Paul Jones ensures that the bottom wire is secured at 46 centimetre (roughly knee height) above ground. Photo: Robert Anderson 7